UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
☒ |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2025 |
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
☐ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the transition period from _______ to _______ |
|
|
|
Commission file number: 001-36294 |
uniQure N.V.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
The Netherlands (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
Not applicable (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Paasheuvelweg 25a
1105 BP Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
+31-20-240-6000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Title of each class: |
|
Trading Symbol(s) |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Ordinary Shares, par value €0.05 |
|
QURE |
|
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (The Nasdaq Global Select Market) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ⌧ No ◻.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ⌧ No ◻.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ◻ |
Accelerated filer ⌧ |
Non-accelerated filer ◻ |
Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13 (a) of the Exchange Act ◻
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes ☐ No ⌧
As of May 6, 2025, the registrant had 54,748,496 ordinary shares, par value €0.05, outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities, Use of Proceeds, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
SPECIAL CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” as defined under federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations of future events and many of these statements can be identified using terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “may,” “will,” “projects,” “continues,” “estimates,” “potential,” “opportunity” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements, include, but are not limited to, statements concerning: our ability to fund our future operations; our financial position, revenues, costs, expenses, uses of cash and capital requirements; our need for additional financing or the time period for which our existing cash resources will be sufficient to meet our operating requirements; the success, progress, number, scope, cost, duration, timing or results of our research and development activities, preclinical and clinical trials, including the timing for initiation or completion of or availability of results from any preclinical studies and clinical trials or for the submission, review or approval of any regulatory filing; the timing of, and our ability to, obtain and maintain regulatory approvals for any of our product candidates; the potential benefits that may be derived from any of our product candidates; our strategies, prospects, plans, goals, expectations, forecasts or objectives; the success of our collaborations with third parties; our ability to identify and develop new product candidates and technologies; our intellectual property position; our commercialization, marketing and manufacturing capabilities and strategy; our ability to identify, recruit and retain key personnel; our financial performance; developments and projections relating to our competitors in the industry; and our liquidity and working capital requirements.
Forward-looking statements are only predictions based on management’s current views and assumptions and involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those projected or implied. The most significant factors known to us that could materially adversely affect our business, operations, industry, financial position or future financial performance include those discussed in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors,” as well as those discussed in Part I, Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as other factors which may be identified from time to time in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2025 (the “Annual Report”), or in the documents where such forward-looking statements appear. You should carefully consider that information before you make an investment decision.
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date that they were made. Our actual results or experience could differ significantly from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and from historical results, due to the risks and uncertainties described in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report, including in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors,” as well as others that we may consider immaterial or do not anticipate at this time. These cautionary statements should be considered in connection with any written or oral forward-looking statements that we may make in the future or may file or furnish with the SEC. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements after completion of the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to reflect later events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements.
In addition, with respect to all our forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
1
Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.Financial Statements
uniQure N.V.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
||
|
|
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
||||
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
217,229 |
|
$ |
158,930 |
Current investment securities |
|
|
191,782 |
|
|
208,591 |
Accounts receivable |
|
|
2,522 |
|
|
5,881 |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
13,420 |
|
|
9,281 |
Other current assets and receivables |
|
|
10,468 |
|
|
7,606 |
Total current assets |
|
|
435,421 |
|
|
390,289 |
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $36.1 million as of March 31, 2025 and $31.7 million as of December 31, 2024 |
|
|
18,081 |
|
|
20,424 |
Other investments |
|
|
28,273 |
|
|
27,464 |
Operating lease right-of-use assets |
|
|
13,466 |
|
|
13,647 |
Intangible assets, net, including in-process research and development assets of $58.0 million as of March 31, 2025 and $55.6 million as of December 31, 2024 |
|
|
71,992 |
|
|
71,043 |
Goodwill |
|
|
23,351 |
|
|
22,414 |
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
9,390 |
|
|
9,856 |
Other non-current assets |
|
|
5,429 |
|
|
1,399 |
Total non-current assets |
|
|
169,982 |
|
|
166,247 |
Total assets |
|
$ |
605,403 |
|
$ |
556,536 |
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
5,268 |
|
$ |
7,227 |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
27,344 |
|
|
29,225 |
Current portion of operating lease liabilities |
|
|
3,698 |
|
|
3,601 |
Total current liabilities |
|
|
36,310 |
|
|
40,053 |
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
51,592 |
|
|
51,324 |
Liability from royalty financing agreement |
|
|
446,660 |
|
|
434,930 |
Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion |
|
|
10,906 |
|
|
11,136 |
Contingent consideration |
|
|
12,560 |
|
|
10,860 |
Deferred tax liability, net |
|
|
7,338 |
|
|
7,043 |
Other non-current liabilities, net of current portion |
|
|
6,351 |
|
|
7,942 |
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
535,407 |
|
|
523,235 |
Total liabilities |
|
|
571,717 |
|
|
563,288 |
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' equity / (deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares, €0.05 par value: 80,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 and 54,698,479 and 48,988,087 ordinary shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively |
|
|
3,240 |
|
|
2,945 |
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
1,257,853 |
|
|
1,173,068 |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(53,805) |
|
|
(52,800) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(1,173,602) |
|
|
(1,129,965) |
Total shareholders' equity / (deficit) |
|
|
33,686 |
|
|
(6,752) |
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity / (deficit) |
|
$ |
605,403 |
|
$ |
556,536 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
uniQure N.V.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
||
|
|
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
||||
License revenues |
|
$ |
1,567 |
|
$ |
1,202 |
Contract manufacturing revenues |
|
|
— |
|
|
3,990 |
Collaboration revenues |
|
|
— |
|
|
3,293 |
Total revenues |
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
8,485 |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of license revenues |
|
|
(197) |
|
|
(150) |
Cost of contract manufacturing revenues |
|
|
— |
|
|
(9,076) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(36,140) |
|
|
(40,692) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(10,908) |
|
|
(13,937) |
Total operating expenses |
|
|
(47,245) |
|
|
(63,855) |
Other income |
|
|
8,306 |
|
|
1,376 |
Other expense |
|
|
(1,959) |
|
|
(234) |
Loss from operations |
|
|
(39,331) |
|
|
(54,228) |
Interest income |
|
|
4,127 |
|
|
6,508 |
Interest expense |
|
|
(15,109) |
|
|
(16,097) |
Foreign currency gains / (losses), net |
|
|
7,172 |
|
|
(1,145) |
Loss before income tax expense |
|
$ |
(43,141) |
|
$ |
(64,962) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(496) |
|
|
(656) |
Net loss |
|
$ |
(43,637) |
|
$ |
(65,618) |
Other comprehensive (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation losses, net |
|
|
(1,005) |
|
|
(2,524) |
Defined benefit pension gain, net of taxes |
|
|
— |
|
|
35 |
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(44,642) |
|
$ |
(68,107) |
Earnings per ordinary share - basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per ordinary share |
|
$ |
(0.82) |
|
$ |
(1.36) |
Weighted average shares - basic and diluted |
|
|
53,110,580 |
|
|
48,384,510 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
uniQure N.V.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2025 AND 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
other |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|||
|
|
Ordinary shares |
|
paid-in |
|
comprehensive |
|
Accumulated |
|
shareholders’ |
|||||||
|
|
No. of shares |
|
Amount |
|
capital |
|
loss |
|
deficit |
|
(deficit) / equity |
|||||
|
|
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
|||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2023 |
|
47,833,830 |
|
$ |
2,883 |
|
$ |
1,148,749 |
|
$ |
(53,553) |
|
$ |
(890,409) |
|
$ |
207,670 |
Loss for the period |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(65,618) |
|
|
(65,618) |
Other comprehensive loss, net |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(2,489) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(2,489) |
Restricted share units distributed during the period |
|
658,527 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
(36) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
7,191 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
7,191 |
Balance at March 31, 2024 |
|
48,492,357 |
|
$ |
2,919 |
|
$ |
1,155,904 |
|
$ |
(56,042) |
|
$ |
(956,027) |
|
$ |
146,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2024 |
|
48,988,087 |
|
$ |
2,945 |
|
$ |
1,173,068 |
|
$ |
(52,800) |
|
$ |
(1,129,965) |
|
$ |
(6,752) |
Loss for the period |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(43,637) |
|
|
(43,637) |
Other comprehensive loss, net |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1,005) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1,005) |
Follow-on public offering |
|
5,073,529 |
|
|
261 |
|
|
80,250 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
80,511 |
Exercises of share options |
|
15,928 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
158 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
159 |
Restricted and performance share units distributed during the period |
|
620,935 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
(33) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
4,410 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
4,410 |
Balance at March 31, 2025 |
|
54,698,479 |
|
$ |
3,240 |
|
$ |
1,257,853 |
|
$ |
(53,805) |
|
$ |
(1,173,602) |
|
$ |
33,686 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
uniQure N.V.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(43,637) |
|
$ |
(65,618) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,527 |
|
|
2,629 |
Amortization of discount on investment securities |
|
|
(2,117) |
|
|
(3,695) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
4,410 |
|
|
7,191 |
Royalty financing agreement interest expense, net of interest paid |
|
|
8,358 |
|
|
10,925 |
Deferred tax expense |
|
|
496 |
|
|
656 |
Changes in fair value of contingent consideration |
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
165 |
Unrealized foreign exchange (gains) / losses, net |
|
|
(7,105) |
|
|
1,389 |
Other items, net |
|
|
(3,971) |
|
|
2,778 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, and other current assets and receivables |
|
|
(2,979) |
|
|
(10,417) |
Inventories |
|
|
— |
|
|
2,236 |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(2,093) |
|
|
(701) |
Accrued expenses, other liabilities, and operating leases |
|
|
(1,205) |
|
|
(8,113) |
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(44,100) |
|
|
(60,575) |
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds on maturity of debt securities |
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
150,107 |
Investment in debt securities |
|
|
(64,775) |
|
|
(83,778) |
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment |
|
|
(126) |
|
|
(2,344) |
Net cash generated from investing activities |
|
|
20,099 |
|
|
63,985 |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from public offering of shares in connection with follow on, net of issuance costs |
|
|
80,511 |
|
|
— |
Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares related to employee stock option and purchase plans |
|
|
159 |
|
|
— |
Net cash generated from financing activities |
|
|
80,670 |
|
|
— |
Currency effect on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
(1,725) |
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
58,329 |
|
|
1,685 |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period |
|
|
160,329 |
|
|
244,544 |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of period |
|
$ |
218,658 |
|
$ |
246,229 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
217,229 |
|
$ |
243,062 |
Restricted cash related to leasehold and other deposits |
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
3,167 |
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
$ |
218,658 |
|
$ |
246,229 |
Supplemental cash flow disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
(6,491) |
|
$ |
(4,761) |
Non-cash decrease in accounts payables and accrued expenses and other current liabilities related to purchases of property, plant, and equipment |
|
$ |
(92) |
|
$ |
(577) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
uniQure N.V.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1General business information
uniQure N.V. (the “Company”) was incorporated on January 9, 2012, as a private company with limited liability (besloten vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid) under the laws of the Netherlands. The Company is a leader in the field of gene therapy and seeks to deliver to patients suffering from rare and other devastating diseases single treatments with potentially curative results. The Company’s business was founded in 1998 and was initially operated through its predecessor company, Amsterdam Molecular Therapeutics Holding N.V. (“AMT”). In 2012, AMT undertook a corporate reorganization, pursuant to which uniQure B.V. acquired the entire business and assets of AMT and completed a share-for-share exchange with the shareholders of AMT. Effective February 10, 2014, in connection with its initial public offering, the Company converted into a public company with limited liability (naamloze vennootschap) and changed its legal name from uniQure B.V. to uniQure N.V.
The Company is registered in the trade register of the Dutch Chamber of Commerce (Kamer van Koophandel) in Amsterdam, the Netherlands under number 54385229. The Company’s headquarters are in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and its registered office is located at Paasheuvelweg 25a, Amsterdam 1105 BP, the Netherlands and its telephone number is +31 20 240 6000.
The Company’s ordinary shares are listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and trade under the symbol “QURE”.
2Summary of significant accounting policies
2.1Basis of preparation
The Company prepared these unaudited consolidated financial statements in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and applicable rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. Any reference in these notes to applicable guidance is meant to refer to authoritative U.S. GAAP as found in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and Accounting Standards Updates of the Financial Accounting Standards Board.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements are presented in United States (“U.S.”) dollars, except where otherwise indicated. Transactions denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are presented in the transaction currency with the U.S. dollar amount included in parenthesis, converted at the foreign exchange rate as of the transaction date.
2.2Unaudited interim financial information
The interim financial statements and related disclosures are unaudited, have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and changes in financial position for the period presented.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been omitted. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2025, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2025, or for any other future year or interim period. The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 filed by the Company with the SEC on February 27, 2025 (the “Annual Report”).
6
2.3Use of estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
2.4Accounting policies
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these unaudited consolidated financial statements are described in the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024, and the notes thereto, which are included in the Annual Report. There have been no material changes in the Company’s significant accounting policies during the three months ended March 31, 2025.
2.5Recent accounting pronouncements
There have been no new accounting pronouncements or changes to accounting pronouncements during the three months ended March 31, 2025, as compared to the recent accounting pronouncements described in Note 2.3.29 of the Annual Report, which could be expected to materially impact the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3 |
Other investments |
Convertible promissory note
The Company has an investment in a convertible promissory note with a nominal amount of $12.5 million, bearing interest at 8.0% per annum. The convertible promissory note was issued in July 2024 and matures in October, 2029. The convertible promissory note had a balance of $13.9 million as of March 31, 2025 (December 31, 2024: $13.7 million), and is presented within “Other investments” on the Company’s unaudited consolidated balance sheets. In the three month period ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024, the Company recognized $0.2 million and nil of interest income, respectively. As of March 31, 2025, the Company has not recorded an allowance for credit losses related to the convertible promissory note.
Investments valued under measurement alternative
The Company has investments in non-publicly traded equity securities without readily determinable fair values. These investments are accounted for at cost, less impairment and adjusted to fair value if there are observable price changes in orderly transactions for identical or similar investments using the measurement alternative in accordance with ASC 321, Investments – Equity Securities. The carrying value of these investments as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 was $14.4 million, and are presented within “Other investments” on the Company’s unaudited consolidated balance sheets. The Company did not recognize any gains, losses, or impairments relating to investments carried under the measurement alternative in the three month period ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024.
7
4 |
Investment securities |
The following tables summarize the Company’s investments in government debt securities as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024:
|
|
At March 31, 2025 |
||||||||||
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
Gross unrealized holding gains |
|
Gross unrealized holding losses |
|
Estimated fair value |
||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
||||||||||
Current investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government debt securities (held-to-maturity) |
|
$ |
191,782 |
|
$ |
9 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
191,791 |
Total |
|
$ |
191,782 |
|
$ |
9 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
191,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2024 |
||||||||||
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
Gross unrealized holding gains |
|
Gross unrealized holding losses |
|
Estimated fair value |
||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
||||||||||
Current investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government debt securities (held-to-maturity) |
|
$ |
208,591 |
|
$ |
164 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
208,755 |
Total |
|
$ |
208,591 |
|
$ |
164 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
208,755 |
The Company invests in short-term U.S. and European government debt securities with the highest investment credit rating. The U.S. and European government bonds are U.S. dollar and euro denominated, respectively.
Investment securities with original maturities of 90 days or less when purchased are presented within cash and cash equivalents and measured at amortized cost (March 31, 2025: $43.4 million, December 31, 2024: $15.3 million).
Inputs to the fair value of the investments are considered Level 2 inputs.
5 |
Fair value measurement |
The Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, either upon initial recognition or for subsequent accounting or reporting. ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures requires disclosure of methodologies used in determining the reported fair values and establishes a hierarchy of inputs used when available. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 – Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company can access at the measurement date.
Level 2 – Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active or models for which the inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 – Valuations that require inputs that reflect the Company’s own assumptions that are both significant to the fair value measurement and are unobservable.
To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized as Level 3. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable from licensing and collaboration partners, other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities reflected in the consolidated balance sheets approximate their fair values due to their short-term maturities.
8
The following table sets forth the Company’s assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024:
|
|
Quoted prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
|
Total |
|
Classification in Consolidated |
||||
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|||||||||
At December 31, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
158,930 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
158,930 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
Restricted cash |
|
|
1,399 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,399 |
|
Other non-current assets |
Total assets |
|
$ |
160,329 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
160,329 |
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
10,860 |
|
|
10,860 |
|
Contingent consideration |
Consideration for post-acquisition services |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
370 |
|
|
370 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
11,230 |
|
$ |
11,230 |
|
|
At March 31, 2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
217,229 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
217,229 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
Restricted cash |
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,429 |
|
Other non-current assets |
Total assets |
|
$ |
218,658 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
218,658 |
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
12,560 |
|
|
12,560 |
|
Contingent consideration |
Consideration for post-acquisition services |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
428 |
|
|
428 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
12,988 |
|
$ |
12,988 |
|
|
Contingent consideration
The Company is required to pay up to EUR 143.1 million (or $154.8 million based on the foreign exchange rate on March 31, 2025) to the former shareholders of uniQure France SAS (formerly Corlieve Therapeutics SAS) upon the achievement of the remaining contractually defined milestones in connection with the Company’s acquisition of uniQure France SAS.
The fair value of the contingent consideration as of March 31, 2025 was $12.6 million (December 31, 2024: $10.9 million) using discount rates of approximately 14.8% to 15.5% (December 31, 2024: 15.3% to 16.2%).
If, as of March 31, 2025, the Company had assumed a 100% likelihood of AMT-260 advancing into a Phase III clinical study, then the fair value of the contingent consideration would have increased to $40.5 million. If, as of March 31, 2025, the Company had assumed that it would discontinue development of the AMT-260 program, then the contingent consideration would have been released to income.
The following table presents the changes in fair value of the contingent consideration between December 31, 2024 and March 31, 2025:
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
contingent |
|
|
|
consideration |
|
|
|
2025 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2024 |
|
$ |
10,860 |
Change in fair value (presented within research and development expenses) |
|
|
1,216 |
Currency translation effects |
|
|
484 |
Balance at March 31, 2025 |
|
$ |
12,560 |
As of March 31, 2025, the Company classified nil (December 31, 2024: nil) of the total contingent consideration of $12.6 million (December 31, 2024: $10.9 million) as current liabilities. The balance sheet classification between current and non-current liabilities is based upon the Company’s best estimate of the timing of settlement of the remaining relevant milestones.
9
Investment securities
Refer to Note 4 “Investment securities” for the fair value of the investment securities as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024.
6 |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities include the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
||||
Personnel related accruals and liabilities |
|
$ |
10,921 |
|
$ |
12,583 |
Accruals for goods received from and services provided by vendors-not yet billed |
|
|
11,594 |
|
|
10,109 |
Current portion of firm purchase commitment liability |
|
|
3,249 |
|
|
1,582 |
Liability owed to the Purchaser pursuant to the Royalty Financing Agreement (refer to Note 8 "Royalty Financing Agreement") |
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
4,951 |
Total |
|
$ |
27,344 |
|
$ |
29,225 |
7Long-term debt
On June 14, 2013, the Company entered into a venture debt loan facility with Hercules Capital, Inc. (formerly known as Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc.) (“Hercules”). The facility was amended and restated in 2014, 2016, 2018, 2021 and on May 12, 2023 (the “2023 Amended Facility”) and July 22, 2024 (the “2024 Amended Facility”).
In July 2024, in connection with the divestment of the Company’s commercial manufacturing activities located in Lexington, MA and the amendment of the 2023 Amended Facility, the Company prepaid $50.0 million of the $100.0 million of principal outstanding as well as $3.1 million in end-of-term fees.
The 2023 Amended Facility extended the maturity date and interest-only period from December 1, 2025 to January 5, 2027 (the “Maturity Date”).
The total principal outstanding as of March 31, 2025 under the 2024 Amended Facility was $50.0 million.
The Company is required to repay the residual principal balance on the Maturity Date. The interest rate is adjustable and is the greater of (i) 7.95% and (ii) 7.95% plus the prime rate less 3.25% per annum. Pursuant to the terms of the 2024 Amended Facility, the Company owes a back-end fee of $2.4 million on December 1, 2025 and a back-end fee of $0.6 million on the Maturity Date.
The amortized cost (including interest due presented as part of accrued expenses and other current liabilities) was $52.1 million as of March 31, 2025, compared to $51.9 million as of December 31, 2024, and is recorded net of discount and debt issuance costs. The foreign currency gain on the facility in the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $2.1 million compared to a foreign currency loss of $2.3 million during the same period in 2024.
Interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $1.8 million, compared to $3.7 million during the same period in 2024.
10
Under the 2024 Amended Facility, the Company must remain current in its periodic reporting requirements and is required to keep a minimum cash balance deposited in bank accounts in the U.S. equivalent to the lesser of (i) 65% of the outstanding balance of principal due or (ii) 100% of worldwide cash and cash equivalents. This restriction on cash and cash equivalents only relates to the location of the cash and cash equivalents, and such cash and cash equivalents can be used at the discretion of the Company. Beginning on April 1, 2024, the Company is required to keep a minimum of unrestricted cash equal to at least 30% of the loan amount outstanding. In combination with other covenants, the 2024 Amended Facility restricts the Company’s ability to, among other things, incur future indebtedness and obtain additional debt financing, to make investments in securities or in other companies, to transfer assets, to perform certain corporate changes, to make loans to employees, officers, and directors, and to make dividend payments and other distributions to its shareholders. The Company secured the facilities by directly or indirectly pledging its total assets of $605.4 million, less $78.4 million of cash and cash equivalents and other current assets held by the Company, and $82.4 million of other current assets and investment held by uniQure France SAS as well as receivables sold to the Purchaser.
Under the 2024 Amended Facility, the occurrence of a material adverse effect, as defined therein, would entitle Hercules to declare all principal, interest and other amounts owed by the Company immediately due and payable. As of March 31, 2025, the Company was in material compliance with all covenants and provisions of the Amended Facility.
8Royalty Financing Agreement
On May 12, 2023, the Company entered into a royalty purchase agreement (the “Royalty Financing Agreement”) with HemB SPV, L.P. (the “Purchaser”). Under the terms of the Royalty Financing Agreement, the Company received an upfront payment of $375.0 million in exchange for its rights to the lowest royalty tier on CSL Behring LLC’s (“CSL Behring”) worldwide net sales of HEMGENIX® for certain current and future royalties due to the Company. The Company will be obligated to pay $25.0 million of the first worldwide sales milestone payment from CSL Behring, if received, to the Purchaser.
The Purchaser will receive 1.85 times the upfront payment (or $693.8 million) until June 30, 2032 (“First Hard Cap Date”) if such thresholds are met or, if such cap is not met by June 30, 2032, up to 2.25 times of the upfront through December 31, 2038 (“Second Hard Cap Date”). If, on or prior to the defined dates for each cap amount, the total amount of royalty payments received by the Purchaser equals or exceeds the cap amount applicable to such date, the Royalty Financing Agreement will automatically terminate and all rights to the HEMGENIX® royalty payments will revert back to the Company. The Company has no obligation to repay any amounts received from the Purchaser in the event that the applicable cap amount is not reached during the term of the Royalty Financing Agreement.
The Company has retained the rights to all other royalties, as well as contractual milestones totaling up to $1.3 billion, under the terms of the commercialization and license agreement with CSL Behring (the “CSL Behring Agreement”).
Net proceeds from the Royalty Financing Agreement were $370.1 million. The Company initially recorded these net proceeds as “Liability from royalty financing agreement” at their fair market value on its consolidated balance sheet as of closing of the transaction on June 5, 2023. Following the initial recognition, the Company records the debt at amortized cost.
As of March 31, 2025 the Company expects to satisfy its commitment to the Purchaser prior to the Second Hard Cap Date. The Company recorded the difference of $473.7 million between the total expected payments of $843.8 million to the Purchaser and the $370.1 million net proceeds as interest expense using the effective interest rate method. The Company determined the effective interest rate based on the projected cash flows up to the Second Hard Cap Date. Based on the Company’s projections the effective interest rate is expected to be within a range of 12.0% to 13.5% per annum. The Company would have recorded the following amounts of interest expense if it had used the effective interest rate at the lower and upper end of this range:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
||
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|||
Interest expenses at effective interest rate of 12.0% per annum |
|
$ |
13.2 |
|
$ |
12.1 |
Interest recorded in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss and income |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
12.4 |
Interest expenses at effective interest rate of 13.5% per annum |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
13.7 |
11
The Company prospectively updates the effective interest rate at each reporting date based on updated cash flow projections.
The following table presents the movement in the liability related to the Royalty Financing Agreement between December 31, 2024 and March 31, 2025:
|
|
Amount of liability |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2024 (includes $5.0 million presented as "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities) |
|
$ |
439,881 |
Royalty payments to the Purchaser |
|
|
(4,951) |
Interest expense for the period |
|
|
13,309 |
Balance as of March 31, 2025 (includes $1.6 million presented as "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities) |
|
$ |
448,239 |
9Shareholders’ Equity
In January 2025, the Company received net proceeds of $70.1 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses payable by the Company, through a follow-on public offering of 4.4 million ordinary shares at a public offering price of $17.00 per ordinary share.
In February 2025, the Company received an additional $10.6 million in net proceeds upon the underwriters’ exercise of their option to purchase an additional 0.7 million ordinary shares at the public offering price.
10Share-based compensation
The Company’s share-based compensation plans include the amended and restated 2014 Share Incentive Plan (as amended, the “2014 Plan”) and inducement grants under Rule 5653(c)(4) of the Nasdaq Global Select Market with terms similar to the 2014 Plan (together the “2014 Plans”). At the annual general meeting of shareholders in June 2024, the Company’s shareholders authorized an additional 1,500,000 shares for issuance. As of March 31, 2025, a total of 3,912,283 ordinary shares remain available for issuance under the 2014 Plan.
In June 2018, the Company’s shareholders adopted and approved an employee share purchase plan (the “ESPP”) allowing the Company to issue up to 150,000 ordinary shares. The ESPP is intended to qualify under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Under the ESPP, employees are eligible to purchase ordinary shares through payroll deductions, subject to any plan limitations. The purchase price of the ordinary shares on each purchase date is equal to 85% of the lower of the closing market price on the offering date and the closing market price on the purchase date of each three-month offering period.
2014 Plans and ESPP
Share-based compensation expense recognized by classification included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss in relation to the 2014 Plans and the ESPP for the periods indicated below was as follows:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
||||
Cost of manufacturing services revenue |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
345 |
Research and development |
|
|
2,463 |
|
|
3,425 |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
1,947 |
|
|
3,421 |
Total |
|
$ |
4,410 |
|
$ |
7,191 |
12
Share-based compensation expense / (income) recognized by award type for the 2014 Plans as well as the ESPP was as follows:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
||||
Award type/ESPP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share options |
|
$ |
1,637 |
|
$ |
2,913 |
Restricted share units |
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
4,370 |
Performance share units |
|
|
560 |
|
|
(99) |
Employee share purchase plan |
|
|
— |
|
|
7 |
Total |
|
$ |
4,410 |
|
$ |
7,191 |
As of March 31, 2025, the unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to unvested awards under the 2014 Plans were:
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
Weighted average |
|
|
|
share-based |
|
remaining |
|
|
|
compensation |
|
period for |
|
|
|
expense |
|
recognition |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
(in years) |
|
Award type |
|
|
|
|
|
Share options |
|
$ |
13,399 |
|
2.77 |
Restricted share units |
|
|
17,583 |
|
2.27 |
Performance share units |
|
|
2,321 |
|
0.75 |
Total |
|
$ |
33,303 |
|
2.36 |
The Company satisfies the exercise of share options and vesting of Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”) and Performance Share Units (“PSUs”) through newly issued ordinary shares.
Share options
Share options are priced on the date of grant and, except for certain grants made to non-executive directors, vest over a period of four years. The first 25% of each grant vests after one year from the initial grant date and the remainder vests in equal quarterly installments over years two, three and four. Certain grants to non-executive directors vest in full after one year. Any options that vest must be exercised by the tenth anniversary of the initial grant date.
The following table summarizes option activity under the 2014 Plans for the three months ended March 31, 2025:
|
|
Options |
|||
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted average |
|
|
|
ordinary shares |
|
exercise price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2024 |
|
4,967,160 |
|
|
19.87 |
Granted |
|
791,000 |
|
$ |
10.90 |
Forfeited |
|
(72,965) |
|
$ |
13.39 |
Expired |
|
(385,871) |
|
$ |
31.06 |
Exercised |
|
(15,928) |
|
$ |
9.96 |
Outstanding at March 31, 2025 |
|
5,283,396 |
|
$ |
17.83 |
Thereof, fully vested, and exercisable on March 31, 2025 |
|
3,053,176 |
|
$ |
15.91 |
Thereof, outstanding and expected to vest after March 31, 2025 |
|
2,230,220 |
|
$ |
11.15 |
Outstanding and expected to vest after December 31, 2024 |
|
1,838,603 |
|
$ |
11.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average grant date fair value of options issued during the period (in $ millions) |
|
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
13
The fair value of each option issued is estimated at the respective grant date using the Hull & White option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
Assumptions |
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
80% |
|
70% |
Expected terms |
|
10 years |
|
10 years |
Risk free interest rate |
|
4.4% |
|
4.3% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
0.0% |
|
0.0% |
RSUs
The following table summarizes the RSU activity for the three months ended March 31, 2025:
|
|
RSUs |
|||
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
grant-date fair |
|
|
|
ordinary shares |
|
value |
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2024 |
|
1,659,898 |
|
$ |
10.71 |
Granted |
|
949,600 |
|
$ |
10.90 |
Vested |
|
(565,613) |
|
$ |
12.80 |
Forfeited |
|
(87,137) |
|
$ |
9.99 |
Non-vested at March 31, 2025 |
|
1,956,748 |
|
$ |
10.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the period (in $ millions) |
|
|
|
$ |
10.4 |
RSUs generally vest over one to three years. RSUs granted to non-executive directors vest one year from the date of grant.
PSUs
Awards of PSUs are subject to the achievement of specified performance objectives. The fair value of PSUs granted in 2022 and 2024 is determined at the grant date by reference to share-price. The fair value of PSUs awarded in 2024 and for which the service period precedes the grant date, is being determined by reference to the price of the Company’s ordinary shares as of March 31, 2025.
The following table summarizes the PSU activity for the three months ended March 31, 2025:
|
|
PSUs |
|||
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
grant-date fair |
|
|
|
ordinary shares |
|
value |
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2024 |
|
150,120 |
|
$ |
21.65 |
Vested |
|
(55,322) |
|
$ |
29.10 |
Forfeited |
|
(38,620) |
|
$ |
19.25 |
Non-vested at March 31, 2025 |
|
56,178 |
|
$ |
5.02 |
PSUs awarded but not yet earned |
|
230,000 |
|
$ |
10.60 |
Total non-vested and discretionary PSUs |
|
286,178 |
|
$ |
9.50 |
In the three months ended March 31, 2025, there was an increase in the number of ordinary shares awarded, of 115,000 shares, related to the PSUs awarded but not yet earned, as a result of the increase of the expected payout from 100% to 200%.
14
ESPP
During the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, nil ordinary shares were issued under the ESPP. As of March 31, 2025, 86,712 ordinary shares remain available for issuance under the ESPP compared to a total of 96,862 as of March 31, 2024.
11 |
Segment Reporting |
The Company is advancing a pipeline of innovative gene therapies seeking to deliver to patients suffering from rare and other devastating diseases single treatments with potentially curative results. The Company manages the operations related to these research and development activities within one operating segment because they rely on a common set of infrastructure, resources and technology of the products and production processes, types of customers, distribution methods and regulatory environment.
The leadership team is identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”).
The CODM allocates resources to research projects and clinical candidates based on scientific data as well as quantitative and qualitative expected risk adjusted returns on investment. The CODM uses segment operating loss to monitor that cash operating losses remain within the approved budget.
The accounting policies of the operating segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
||||
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,567 |
|
$ |
8,485 |
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee related expenses |
|
|
(14,216) |
|
|
(24,383) |
Laboratory and development expenses |
|
|
(15,967) |
|
|
(9,076) |
Professional fees |
|
|
(2,057) |
|
|
(2,263) |
Facility expenses |
|
|
(1,667) |
|
|
(5,139) |
Consumables |
|
|
(936) |
|
|
(3,212) |
Other segment items(1) |
|
|
(1,034) |
|
|
(7,432) |
Segment operating loss |
|
|
(34,310) |
|
|
(43,020) |
Reconciliation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
(4,527) |
|
|
(2,629) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
(4,410) |
|
|
(7,191) |
Fair value loss - contingent consideration |
|
|
(1,216) |
|
|
(165) |
Foreign currency gains / (losses), net |
|
|
7,172 |
|
|
(1,145) |
Interest income |
|
|
4,127 |
|
|
6,508 |
Interest expense - Royalty Financing Agreement |
|
|
(13,309) |
|
|
(12,401) |
Interest expense - Hercules debt facility |
|
|
(1,800) |
|
|
(3,696) |
Other reconciling items |
|
|
5,132 |
|
|
(1,223) |
Consolidated loss before income tax expense |
|
$ |
(43,141) |
|
$ |
(64,962) |
(1) | Other segment items included in segment operating loss include costs related to intellectual property, information technology and insurance offset by income related to payments received from European authorities to subsidize the Company’s research and development in the Netherlands and France. |
15
12 |
CSL Behring collaboration |
In June 2020, uniQure biopharma B.V. entered into the CSL Behring Agreement, pursuant to which CSL Behring received exclusive global rights to HEMGENIX®.
Following the divestiture of the Company’s commercial manufacturing activities located in Lexington, MA (“Lexington Transaction”), the Company determined that it is an agent in the sale of HEMGENIX® to CSL Behring. As a result of the Company being an agent, the Company recognizes corresponding costs related to the purchase of HEMGENIX® from Genezen Holdings Inc. and its affiliate Genezen MA, Inc. (together “Genezen”) net of income from the sales of HEMGENIX® to CSL Behring as well as income related to the release of liabilities associated with expected net losses in Other expense within the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
Accounts receivable related to collaboration services and royalty revenue were as follows:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
||||
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
2,522 |
|
$ |
5,657 |
Total |
|
$ |
2,522 |
|
$ |
5,657 |
13 |
Other income |
Other income for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
||||
Sale of critical reagents to Genezen |
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
$ |
— |
Research and development grants from Dutch authorities |
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
1,224 |
Sublease income |
|
|
458 |
|
|
152 |
Other |
|
|
129 |
|
|
— |
Total |
|
$ |
8,306 |
|
$ |
1,376 |
In the three months ended March 31, 2025 the Company recognized $6.0 million in income related to a one-time sale of critical reagents to Genezen. There were no sales of critical reagents in the comparative prior period.
14 |
Income taxes |
The Company recorded $0.5 million deferred tax expense in relation to its operations in the U.S. during the three months ended March 31, 2025. The Company recorded $0.7 million deferred tax expense in relation to its operations in the U.S. during the three months ended March 31, 2024.
The effective income tax rate of 1.1% during the three months ended March 31, 2025 is substantially lower than the enacted rate of 25.8% in the Netherlands as the Company records a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets in the Netherlands and a partial valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets in France. The effective income tax rate during the three months ended March 31, 2024 was 1.0% as the Company had recorded a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets in the Netherlands and a partial valuation allowance against its net deferred tax asset in France.
16
15Basic and diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding, assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive ordinary shares. As the Company has incurred a loss in the three months ended March 31, 2025, all potentially dilutive ordinary shares would have an antidilutive effect, if converted, and thus have been excluded from the computation of loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The ordinary shares are presented without giving effect to the application of the treasury method or exercise prices that would be above the share price as of March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024, respectively.
The potentially dilutive ordinary shares are summarized below:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
||
Anti-dilutive ordinary share equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options under 2014 Plans and previous plan |
|
|
5,283,396 |
|
|
5,821,909 |
Non-vested RSUs and PSUs |
|
|
2,242,926 |
|
|
2,913,048 |
ESPP |
|
|
— |
|
|
3,140 |
Total anti-dilutive ordinary share equivalents |
|
|
7,526,322 |
|
|
8,738,097 |
16Subsequent events
None.
17
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto and other disclosures included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the disclosures under Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors,” and our audited financial information and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”). Our unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”) and unless otherwise indicated are presented in U.S. dollars.
Overview
We are a leader in the field of gene therapy, seeking to deliver to patients suffering from rare and other devastating diseases single treatments with potentially curative results. We are advancing a focused pipeline of innovative gene therapies, including our clinical candidates for the treatment of Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis caused by mutations in superoxide dismutase 1 (“SOD1-ALS”), refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (“mTLE”) and Fabry disease.
Business Developments
Financing
In January 2025, we received net proceeds of $70.1 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses payable by us, through a follow-on public offering of 4.4 million ordinary shares at a public offering price of $17.00 per ordinary share. In February 2025, we received an additional $10.6 million in net proceeds upon the underwriters’ exercise of their option to purchase an additional 0.7 million ordinary shares at the public offering price.
Huntington’s disease program (AMT-130)
RMAT and Breakthrough Therapy Designations
On April 17, 2025, we announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) granted Breakthrough Therapy designation to AMT-130 for the treatment of Huntington’s disease. The Breakthrough Therapy designation is supported by clinical data from the ongoing Phase I/II trials of AMT-130 for the treatment of Huntington’s disease showing the potential for meaningful slowing of disease progression. Breakthrough Therapy designation is intended to expedite the development and review of investigational therapeutic candidates that are intended to treat a serious condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over available therapy on a clinically significant endpoint(s). In general, the preliminary clinical evidence should show a clear advantage over available therapy.
In June 2024, we announced that the FDA granted us Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (“RMAT”) designation for AMT-130 based on the potential of AMT-130 to address the major unmet medical need among patients with Huntington’s disease.
In addition to the RMAT and Breakthrough Therapy designations, the FDA previously granted Orphan Drug designation and Fast Track designation to AMT-130.
Regulatory Alignment
In March 2025, we held a Type B meeting with the FDA to discuss chemistry, manufacturing and controls (“CMC”) requirements for AMT-130, in support of a planned Biologics License Application, (“BLA”) submission. An additional Type B meeting focused on the pivotal statistical analysis plan was held in the second quarter of 2025.
18
In December 2024, following our initial Type B meeting, we announced that we had reached agreement with FDA on key elements of an Accelerated Approval pathway for AMT-130. In correspondence leading up to and following the Type B meeting, FDA agreed that data from the ongoing Phase I/II studies of AMT-130, compared to a natural history external control, may serve as the primary basis for a BLA, submission under FDA’s accelerated approval pathway. The FDA also agreed that composite Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale (“cUHDRS”) may be used as an intermediate clinical endpoint and that reductions in neurofilament light chain (“NfL”) measured in cerebrospinal fluid (“CSF”) may serve as supportive evidence of therapeutic benefit in the application for such accelerated approval.
Recent Developments of other Product Candidates
Temporal lobe epilepsy program (AMT-260)
We are conducting a Phase I/IIa clinical trial (GenTLE) AMT-260 for the treatment of MTLE in the United States. GenTLE consists of two parts. The first part is a multicenter, open-label trial with two dosing cohorts of six patients each to assess safety, tolerability, and first signs for efficacy of AMT-260 in patients with refractory mTLE. The second part is expected to be a randomized, controlled trial to generate proof of concept data. The FDA-approved study protocol provides that the first three patients to be enrolled in the study are required to have MRI-confirmed unilateral, hippocampal sclerosis.
In November 2024 we announced that the first patient had been dosed in GenTLE. In addition, the FDA in February 2025 approved a protocol amendment expanding the inclusion criteria for certain patients in the first cohort to include patients with non-lesional mesial temporal lobe epilepsy in the non-dominant hemisphere.
Fabry disease program (AMT-191)
We are conducting a Phase I/IIa clinical trial of AMT-191 for the treatment of Fabry disease. The multicenter, open-label clinical trial consists of two dose-escalating cohorts of up to six adult male patients each to assess safety, tolerability, and early signs of efficacy of AMT-191 in patients with Fabry disease.
In February 2025, we announced a favorable recommendation from the independent data monitoring committee (“IDMC”) following a review of safety data from the first two patients treated in the Phase I/IIa study. The IDMC’s review did not identify any significant safety concerns and recommended proceeding with enrollment in the second cohort.
In August 2024, we announced that the first patient has been dosed. In September 2024, we announced the FDA granted Orphan Drug Designation to AMT-191 and in October 2024, the FDA granted Fast Track Designation to AMT-191.
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (AMT-162)
EPISOD1 is a Phase I/II multi-center, open-label trial of AMT-162 for the treatment of SOD1-ALS being conducted in the United States consisting of three dose-escalating cohorts with up to four patients each receiving a short course of immunosuppression prior to and after an intrathecal infusion of AMT-162. The trial will explore the safety and tolerability of AMT-162 and will assess exploratory signs of efficacy by measuring neurofilament light chain, a biomarker of neuronal damage, and SOD1 protein.
In October 2024, we announced the first patient had been dosed in EPISOD1. In January 2025, we announced that the IDMC had recommended proceeding with enrollment of the second cohort after a review of the 28-day safety data from the first cohort. We completed enrollment in the second dose cohort and we expect to initiate enrollment in the third dose cohort in the third quarter of 2025.
19
Financial Overview
Key components of our results of operations include the following:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
1,567 |
|
$ |
8,485 |
Cost of license revenues |
|
|
(197) |
|
|
(150) |
Cost of contract manufacturing revenues |
|
|
— |
|
|
(9,076) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(36,140) |
|
|
(40,692) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(10,908) |
|
|
(13,937) |
Net loss |
|
|
(43,637) |
|
|
(65,618) |
As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, we had cash and cash equivalents and investment securities of $409.0 million and $367.5 million, respectively. We had a net loss of $43.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to a net loss of $65.6 million for the same period in 2024. As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, we had accumulated deficits of $1,173.6 million and $1,130.0 million, respectively.
See “Results of Operations” below for a discussion of the detailed components and analysis of the amounts above.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
In preparing our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and pursuant to the rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) we make assumptions, judgments and estimates that can have a significant impact on our net loss and affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosures. We base our assumptions, judgments and estimates on historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not clear from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. In making estimates and judgments, management employs critical accounting policies. A summary of our critical accounting policies as well as a discussion of our critical accounting estimates are presented in our Annual Report. There were no material changes to our critical accounting policies during the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Contract manufacturing
We entered into a development and commercial supply agreement with CSL Behring LLC (“CSL Behring”) in June 2020 for the commercial supply of HEMGENIX®. In July 2024, we divested our commercial manufacturing activities located in Lexington, MA (“Lexington Transaction”). Prior to the Lexington Transaction, we recognized contract manufacturing revenues related to contract manufacturing HEMGENIX® for CSL Behring and the cost to manufacture HEMGENIX® under such an agreement as cost of contract manufacturing.
Research and development expenses
We expense research and development (“R&D”) expenses as incurred. R&D expenses include costs which relate to our primary activities of biopharmaceutical research and development. Our R&D expenses generally consist of costs incurred for the development of our target candidates, which include:
● | employee-related expenses, including salaries, benefits, travel and share-based compensation expense; |
● | costs incurred for laboratory research, preclinical and nonclinical studies, clinical trials, statistical analysis and report writing, and regulatory compliance costs incurred with clinical research organizations and other third-party vendors; |
● | costs incurred to conduct consistency and comparability studies; |
● | costs incurred for the development and improvement of our manufacturing processes and methods; |
● | costs associated with research activities for enabling technology platforms; |
● | costs associated with the rendering of collaboration services; |
● | payments related to identifiable intangible assets without an alternative future use; |
● | payments to our licensors for milestones that have been achieved related to our product candidates; |
20
● | facilities, depreciation, and other expenses, which include direct and allocated expenses for rent and maintenance of facilities, insurance, and other supplies; and |
● | changes in the fair value of liabilities recorded in relation to our acquisition of uniQure France SAS. |
Our R&D expenses may vary substantially from period to period based on the timing of our research and development activities, including manufacturing campaigns, regulatory submissions, and enrollment of patients in clinical trials. The successful development of our product candidates is highly uncertain. Estimating the nature, timing, or cost of the development of any of our product candidates involves considerable judgement due to numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing gene therapies, including the uncertainty of:
● | the scope, rate of progress and expense of our research and development activities; |
● | clinical trial protocols, speed of enrollment and resulting data; |
● | the effectiveness and safety of our product candidates; and |
● | the timing of regulatory approvals. |
A change in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to our product candidates that we may develop could mean a significant change in the expenses and timing associated with the development of such product candidate.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Our general and administrative expenses consist principally of employee, office, consulting, legal and other professional and administrative expenses. We incurred expenses associated with operating as a public company, including expenses for personnel, legal, accounting and audit fees, board of directors’ costs, directors' and officers' liability insurance premiums, Nasdaq listing fees, expenses related to investor relations and fees related to business development and maintaining our patent and license portfolio.
Other items, net
Our other income generally consists of payments received to subsidize our research and development efforts, income from the subleasing of our Amsterdam facility and our Lexington, MA research and development facility, and for the three months ended March 31, 2025, income from a one-time sale of critical reagents.
Following the Lexington Transaction, our other expense primarily consists of costs incurred under our commercial supply agreement (“CSA”) with Genezen Holdings Inc. and its affiliate Genezen MA, Inc. (together “Genezen”). These include costs related to the purchase of HEMGENIX® from Genezen net of income from the sales of HEMGENIX® to CSL Behring, amortization of the intangible asset for our favorable supply terms under the CSA and credits from the release of liabilities related to expected net losses associated with minimum purchase commitments under the CSA. Additionally, other expenses also consist of expenses we incur in relation to our subleasing income.
21
Results of Operations
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024
The following table presents a comparison of our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|||||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
|
2025 vs 2024 |
|||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|||||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
1,567 |
|
$ |
8,485 |
|
$ |
(6,918) |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of license revenues |
|
|
(197) |
|
|
(150) |
|
|
(47) |
Cost of contract manufacturing |
|
|
— |
|
|
(9,076) |
|
|
9,076 |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(36,140) |
|
|
(40,692) |
|
|
4,552 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(10,908) |
|
|
(13,937) |
|
|
3,029 |
Total operating expenses |
|
|
(47,245) |
|
|
(63,855) |
|
|
16,610 |
Other income |
|
|
8,306 |
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
6,930 |
Other expense |
|
|
(1,959) |
|
|
(234) |
|
|
(1,725) |
Loss from operations |
|
|
(39,331) |
|
|
(54,228) |
|
|
14,897 |
Non-operating expense, net |
|
|
(3,810) |
|
|
(10,734) |
|
|
6,924 |
Loss before income tax benefit |
|
$ |
(43,141) |
|
$ |
(64,962) |
|
|
21,821 |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(496) |
|
|
(656) |
|
|
160 |
Net loss |
|
$ |
(43,637) |
|
$ |
(65,618) |
|
$ |
21,981 |
Revenue
Our revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 was as follows:
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|||||||
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
|
2025 vs 2024 |
|||
|
(in thousands) |
|||||||
License revenues |
$ |
1,567 |
|
$ |
1,202 |
|
$ |
365 |
Contract manufacturing revenues |
|
— |
|
|
3,990 |
|
|
(3,990) |
Collaboration revenues |
|
— |
|
|
3,293 |
|
|
(3,293) |
Total revenues |
$ |
1,567 |
|
$ |
8,485 |
|
$ |
(6,918) |
License revenues
We recognize license revenues from CSL Behring related to royalty payments owed on HEMGENIX® sales, when earned. For the three months ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024, we recognized $1.6 million and $1.2 million of license revenues, respectively.
Collaboration revenues
We provide services to CSL Behring in accordance with the CSL Behring Agreement. Collaboration revenue related to these contracted services is recognized when the performance obligations are satisfied. For the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 we recognized nil and $3.3 million of collaboration revenue for CSL Behring, respectively. The decrease in collaboration revenue of $3.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 resulted from us not providing any development and other services to CSL Behring in relation to the CSL Behring Agreement in 2025.
Contract manufacturing revenues
We recognized contract manufacturing revenues related to the manufacturing of HEMGENIX® for CSL Behring prior to the Lexington Transaction. Contract manufacturing revenues were realized when earned upon sales of HEMGENIX® drug product to CSL Behring. We recognized nil contract manufacturing revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $4.0 million for the same period in 2024.
22
Cost of contract manufacturing
We incurred nil costs of contract manufacturing in the three months ended March 31, 2025. In the three months ended March 31, 2024 we incurred $9.1 million costs of contract manufacturing related to the manufacture of HEMGENIX® prior to the Lexington Transaction in July 2024.
R&D expense
R&D expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2025 were $36.1 million, compared to $40.7 million for the same period in 2024. Other research and development expenses are separately classified in the table below. These other expenses are not allocated as they are deployed across multiple projects under development.
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|||||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
|
2025 vs 2024 |
|||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|||||||
Huntington's disease (AMT-130) |
|
$ |
8,230 |
|
$ |
2,426 |
|
$ |
5,804 |
Fabry disease (AMT-191) |
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
817 |
Temporal lobe epilepsy (AMT-260) |
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
2,254 |
|
|
(179) |
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (AMT-162) |
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
1,977 |
|
|
(146) |
Programs in preclinical development and platform related expenses |
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
449 |
|
|
831 |
Total direct research and development expenses |
|
$ |
15,603 |
|
$ |
8,476 |
|
$ |
7,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee and contractor-related expenses |
|
|
10,159 |
|
|
16,923 |
|
|
(6,764) |
Facility expenses |
|
|
4,550 |
|
|
7,095 |
|
|
(2,545) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
2,463 |
|
|
3,425 |
|
|
(962) |
Fair value changes related to contingent consideration |
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
165 |
|
|
1,051 |
Disposables |
|
|
827 |
|
|
1,921 |
|
|
(1,094) |
Other expenses |
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
(1,365) |
Total other research and development expenses |
|
$ |
20,537 |
|
$ |
32,216 |
|
$ |
(11,679) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and development expenses |
|
$ |
36,140 |
|
$ |
40,692 |
|
$ |
(4,552) |
Direct research and development expenses
General
Prior to the Lexington Transaction, we supplied Good Manufacturing Processes (“GMP”) material utilized in our clinical programs for Huntington’s disease and Fabry disease as well as GMP material needed for our preclinical programs using our in-house manufacturing facility. The related expenses were part of “other research and development expenses”. Following the closing of the Lexington Transaction we rely on third party suppliers and present associated expenses for these activities within “direct research and development expenses”.
Huntington’s disease (AMT-130)
In three months ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024, we incurred costs of $8.2 million and $2.4 million respectively. Our external costs for the development of AMT-130 were primarily related to the execution of our U.S. and European studies. The increase of $5.8 million in external cost in 2025 compared to 2024 was primarily driven by activities related to the preparation of the BLA submission for AMT-130 in the United States.
Fabry disease (AMT-191)
In the three months ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024, we incurred costs of $2.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively, related to our development of AMT-19. We incurred $2.1 million and $0.1 million related to clinical trials and CMC development, respectively, compared to $1.3 million and $0.0 million in the comparative period. In November 2023, the FDA cleared the IND application, and we started incurring additional costs for the Phase I/II clinical trial preparation.
23
Temporal lobe epilepsy (AMT-260)
In three months ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024, we incurred costs of $2.1 million and $2.3 million respectively, for the development of AMT-260. We incurred $1.6 million and $0.4 million related to clinical trials and CMC development, respectively, compared to $0.5 million and $1.7 million in the comparative period.
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis caused by mutations in SOD1 (AMT-162)
In the three months ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024, we incurred $1.8 million and $2.0 million of expenses, respectively, to initiate a Phase I/II clinical trial which enrolled the first patient in October 2024. We incurred $1.7 million and $0.1 million related to clinical trials and CMC development, respectively, compared to $0.9 million and $1.1 million in the comparative period.
Preclinical programs & platform development
In the three months ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024, we incurred $1.3 million and $0.4 million of costs, respectively, related primarily to our preclinical activities associated with product candidates for various other research programs and technology innovation projects.
Other research & development expenses
● | We incurred $10.2 million in personnel and contractor-related expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $16.9 million for the same period in 2024. The decrease was primarily related to the divestment of our commercial manufacturing activities in July 2024 as well as a reduction in expense from the restructuring that occurred in August 2024; |
● | We incurred $4.6 million in operating expenses and depreciation expenses related to our rented facilities in Amsterdam and Lexington, Massachusetts in the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $7.1 million in the same period in 2024. The decrease was primarily related to the divestment of our commercial manufacturing activities in July 2024; |
● | We incurred $2.5 million in share-based compensation expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $3.4 million for the same period in 2024. The decrease was primarily related to the divestment of our commercial manufacturing activities and a reduction in expense from the restructuring that occurred in August 2024; |
● | We recognized a $1.2 million loss in the three months ended March 31, 2025, related to an increase in the fair value of contingent consideration associated with the acquisition of uniQure France SAS, compared to $0.2 million loss for the same period in 2024; |
● | We incurred $0.8 million in disposable costs in the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $1.9 million for the same period in 2024; and |
● | We incurred $1.3 million of other expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $2.7 million for the same period in 2024. |
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2025 were $10.9 million, compared to $13.9 million for the same period in 2024.
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|||||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
|
2025 vs 2024 |
|||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|||||||
Employee and contractor-related expenses |
|
$ |
5,485 |
|
$ |
6,219 |
|
$ |
(734) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
1,947 |
|
|
3,421 |
|
|
(1,474) |
Professional fees |
|
|
1,903 |
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
(138) |
Depreciation and facility costs |
|
|
380 |
|
|
442 |
|
|
(62) |
Intellectual property fees |
|
|
283 |
|
|
588 |
|
|
(305) |
Information technology costs |
|
|
281 |
|
|
267 |
|
|
14 |
Other expenses |
|
|
629 |
|
|
959 |
|
|
(330) |
Total selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
10,908 |
|
$ |
13,937 |
|
$ |
(3,029) |
24
● | We incurred $5.5 million in personnel and contractor-related expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $6.2 million in the same period in 2024. The decrease was primarily related to the reduction in personnel and contractors as a result of the divestment of our commercial manufacturing activities and the organizational restructuring in August 2024; |
● | We incurred $1.9 million in share-based compensation expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $3.4 million in the same period in 2024. The decrease was primarily related to the divestment of our commercial manufacturing activities and a reduction in expense from the restructuring that occurred in August 2024; |
● | We incurred $1.9 million in professional fees in the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $2.0 million in the same period in 2024. We regularly incur accounting, audit and legal fees associated with operating as a public company; |
● | We incurred $0.3 million in intellectual property fees including registration and professional fees in the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to $0.6 million in the same period in 2024. The decrease mainly related to a decrease in professional fees; and |
● | We incurred $0.6 million in other expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $1.0 million in the same period in 2024. |
Other items, net
Our other items, net, for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024 were as follows:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|||||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
|
2025 vs 2024 |
|||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|||||||
Sale of critical reagents to Genezen |
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
6,000 |
Research and development grants from Dutch authorities |
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
495 |
Sublease income |
|
|
458 |
|
|
152 |
|
|
306 |
Supply of HEMGENIX® to CSL Behring |
|
|
(1,525) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1,525) |
Sublease expense |
|
|
(434) |
|
|
(234) |
|
|
(200) |
Other income, net |
|
|
129 |
|
|
— |
|
|
129 |
Total other income, net |
|
$ |
6,347 |
|
$ |
1,142 |
|
$ |
5,205 |
In the three months ended March 31, 2025 we recognized $6.0 million in income related to a one-time sale of critical reagents to Genezen (nil in the prior period).
We recognized $1.5 million in net other expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2025, related to the purchase of HEMGENIX® from Genezen, net of income from the sales of HEMGENIX® to CSL Behring, amortization of the intangible asset for our favorable supply terms under the CSA and credits from the release of liabilities related to expected net losses associated with minimum purchase commitments under the CSA.
Other non-operating items, net
Our other non-operating items, net, for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024 were as follows:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|||||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
|
2025 vs 2024 |
|||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|||||||
Interest income |
|
$ |
4,127 |
|
$ |
6,508 |
|
$ |
(2,381) |
Interest expense - Royalty Financing Agreement |
|
|
(13,309) |
|
|
(12,401) |
|
|
(908) |
Interest expense - Hercules debt facility |
|
|
(1,800) |
|
|
(3,696) |
|
|
1,896 |
Foreign currency gains / (losses), net |
|
|
7,172 |
|
|
(1,145) |
|
|
8,317 |
Total non-operating expense, net |
|
$ |
(3,810) |
|
$ |
(10,734) |
|
$ |
6,924 |
We recognize interest income associated with our cash and cash equivalents and investment securities. We recognized $4.1 million in interest income in the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $6.5 million in the same period in the prior year. Our interest income decreased by $2.4 million due to the interest income earned on investment securities as well as cash on hand during the three months ended March 31, 2025.
25
We recognized interest expense of $1.8 million and $3.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2025, and March, 31, 2024, respectively, related to the Hercules Capital, Inc. (“Hercules”) debt facility. Interest expense decreased by $1.9 million in 2025, compared to 2024, primarily due to the $50.0 million repayment of Hercules debt in July 2024, as well as a decrease in market interest rates.
We hold monetary items and enter into transactions in foreign currencies, predominantly in euros and U.S. dollars. We recognize foreign exchange results related to changes in these foreign currencies.
We recognized a net foreign currency gain, related to our borrowings from Hercules, the Royalty Financing Agreement and our cash and cash equivalents and investment securities as well as loans between entities within the uniQure group, of $7.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to a net loss of $1.1 million during the same period in 2024.
Income tax expense
We recognized $0.5 million of deferred tax expense in the three months ended March 31, 2025, and $0.7 million of deferred tax expense for the same period in 2024.
Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of March 31, 2025, we had cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and investment securities of $410.4 million. Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial cash flows from successfully commercializing our proprietary product candidates, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances and marketing, distribution, and licensing arrangements. Based on our current operating plan, research and development plans and our timing expectations related to the progress of our programs, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents and investment securities will fund our operations through the second half of 2027. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect. The amount and timing of our actual expenditures may vary significantly depending on numerous factors, including the timing of a potential BLA submission, the progress of regulatory interactions, approval (if any) and commercialization efforts with respect to AMT-130. We expect that we will require additional funding if we decide to advance any of our other clinical product candidates into late-stage clinical development. Our material cash requirements include the following contractual and other obligations:
Debt
As of March 31, 2025, we had an outstanding loan amount owed to Hercules for an aggregate principal amount of $50.0 million. Future interest payments and financing fees associated with the loan total $14.5 million, with $8.6 million payable within 12 months. We are contractually required to repay the $50.0 million in full in January 2027.
Leases
We have entered into lease arrangements for facilities, including corporate, laboratories and office space. As of March 31, 2025, we had fixed lease payment obligations of $22.8 million, with $4.2 million payable within 12 months. Following the Lexington Transaction, we assigned our lease for the Lexington Facility to Genezen. As of March 31, 2025, we continue to guarantee $19.6 million of fixed lease payments under the lease for the Lexington Facility until the end of the lease term in May 2029.
Commitments related to uniQure France SAS acquisition (nominal amounts)
In relation to our acquisition of uniQure France SAS, we entered into commitments to make payments to the former shareholders upon the achievement of certain contractual milestones. The commitments include payments related to post-acquisition services that we agreed to as part of the transaction. In December 2024, we made a payment of EUR 30.0 million ($31.5 million) to the former shareholders of uniQure France SAS following the dosing of the first patient in Phase I/II clinical trial for AMT-260. As of March 31, 2025, our remaining commitment amounts include EUR 160.0 million ($166.2 million) in potential milestone payments associated with Phase III development and the approval of AMT-260 in the U.S. and European Union. The timing of achieving these milestones and consequently the timing of payments, as well as whether the milestone will be achieved at all, is generally uncertain. These payments are owed in euro and have been translated at the foreign exchange rate as of March 31, 2025, of $1.08/€1.00. As of March 31, 2025, we expect these obligations will become payable between 2029 and 2033. If and when due, up to 25% of the milestone payments can be settled with our ordinary shares.
26
Commitments related to licensors and financial advisors
We have obligations to make future payments to third parties that become due and payable on the achievement of certain development, regulatory and commercial milestones (such as the start of a clinical trial, filing of a BLA, approval by the FDA or product launch) or as a result of collecting payments related to our sale of the exclusive global rights of HEMGENIX® to CSL Behring. We also owe payments to a financial advisor related to certain payments we will collect under the CSL Behring Agreement.
Commitments related to the CSA and the DMSA with Genezen
Our CSA with Genezen requires us to take or pay contract manufacturing services for HEMGENIX® during a three-year period ending July 2027. As of March 31, 2025, our remaining minimum purchase commitments to Genezen amount to $33.1 million, with $17.0 million to be paid within the next 12 months. CSL Behring’s minimum purchase commitments to us over the next 12 months are $16.2 million.
Our development and other manufacturing services agreement (“DMSA”) with Genezen requires us to take or pay contract development services during a three-year period ending July 2027. As of March 31, 2025 our remaining minimum purchase commitments amount to $11.6 million with $4.5 million to be paid within the next 12 months.
The table below summarizes our consolidated cash flow data for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the beginning of the period |
|
$ |
160,329 |
|
$ |
244,544 |
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(44,100) |
|
|
(60,575) |
Net cash generated from investing activities |
|
|
20,099 |
|
|
63,985 |
Net cash generated from financing activities |
|
|
80,670 |
|
|
— |
Foreign exchange impact |
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
(1,725) |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of period |
|
$ |
218,658 |
|
$ |
246,229 |
We had previously incurred losses and cumulative negative cash flows from operations since our business was founded by our predecessor entity AMT Therapeutics Holding N.V. in 1998, with the exception of generating income in 2021 after receiving the upfront payment upon closing of the CSL Behring Agreement. We continue to incur losses in the current period. We recorded a net loss of $43.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2025, respectively, compared to a net loss of $65.6 million during the same period in 2024. As of March 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $1,173.6 million.
Sources of liquidity
From our first institutional venture capital financing in 2006 through the current period, we funded our operations primarily through private and public placements of equity securities, debt securities, payments from our collaboration partners as well as $370.1 million from selling a portion of royalties due from our collaboration partner CSL Behring in 2023. Between July 2021 and July 2023, we collected $617.4 million from CSL Behring as a result of the sale of HEMGENIX® to CSL and other milestones collected from CSL, and we are eligible to receive additional milestone payments, as well as royalties (to the extent not owed to settle the liability from the Royalty Financing Transaction) on net sales of HEMGENIX®.
In January 2025, we raised net proceeds of $70.1 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses payable by us, through a follow-on public offering of 4.4 million ordinary shares at a price to the public of $17.00 per ordinary share. In February 2025, we raised an additional $10.6 million in net proceeds upon the underwriters’ exercise of their option to purchase an additional 0.7 million ordinary shares at the public offering price.
27
On May 12, 2023, we and Hercules amended our debt facility. The amendment extends the Maturity Date and interest-only period from December 2025 to January 2027. In connection with the Lexington Transaction in July 2024 we amended the debt facility again and repaid $50.0 million of the principal balance outstanding. We are required to repay the remaining principal balance of $50.0 million on the Maturity Date. The interest rate is adjustable and is the greater of (i) 7.95% and (ii) 7.95% plus the prime rate less 3.25% per annum. We owe a back-end fee of $2.4 million on December 1, 2025 and a back-end fee of $0.6 million on the Maturity Date.
We are subject to certain covenants under the debt facility and may become subject to covenants under any future indebtedness that could limit our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, or declaring dividends, which could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. In addition, our pledge of assets as collateral to secure our obligations under the 2024 Amended Facility may limit our ability to obtain debt financing. The debt facility permits us to issue up to $500.0 million of convertible debt.
To the extent we need to finance our cash needs through equity offerings or debt financings, such financing may be subject to unfavorable terms including without limitation, the negotiation and execution of definitive documentation, as well as credit and debt market conditions, and we may not be able to obtain such financing on terms acceptable to us or at all. If financing is not available when needed, including through debt or equity financings, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to meet our cash needs. If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing, distribution, or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, results of operations and cash flows.
Net cash used in operating activities
Net cash used in operating activities was $44.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and consisted of net loss of $43.6 million adjusted for non-cash items, including depreciation and amortization expense of $4.5 million, amortization of the discount on investment securities of $2.1 million, share-based compensation expense of $4.4 million, $8.4 million of interest expense net of interest paid related to May 2023 Royalty Financing Agreement, a change in deferred taxes of $0.5 million, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration of $1.2 million, and unrealized foreign exchange gains of $7.1 million. Net cash used in operating activities also included unfavorable changes in operating assets and liabilities of $6.3 million. There was a net increase in accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, and other current assets and receivables of $3.0 million. There was a net decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses, other liabilities, and operating leases of $3.3 million.
Net cash used in operating activities was $60.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and consisted of net loss of $65.6 million adjusted for non-cash items, including depreciation and amortization expense of $2.6 million, amortization of the discount on investment securities of $3.7 million, share-based compensation expense of $7.2 million, $10.9 million of interest expense net of interest paid related to May 2023 Royalty Financing Agreement, a change in deferred taxes of $0.7 million, changes in the fair value of contingent consideration of $0.2 million and unrealized foreign exchange losses of $1.4 million. Net cash used in operating activities also included unfavorable changes in operating assets and liabilities of $17.0 million. There was a net increase in accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, and other current assets and receivables of $10.4 million. There was a decrease in inventory balances of $2.2 million. There was a net decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses, other liabilities, and operating leases of $8.8 million, primarily related to a decrease of $6.7 million from personnel-related accruals.
28
Net cash generated from investing activities
In the three months ended March 31, 2025, we generated $20.1 million in our investing activities compared to generating $64.0 million for the same period in 2024.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturity of debt securities |
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
$ |
150,107 |
Investment in debt securities |
|
|
(64,775) |
|
|
(83,778) |
Capital expenditures - European sites |
|
|
(110) |
|
|
(1,051) |
Capital expenditures - Lexington site |
|
|
(16) |
|
|
(1,293) |
Net cash generated from investing activities |
|
$ |
20,099 |
|
$ |
63,985 |
Net cash generated from financing activities
In the three months ended March 31, 2025, we generated $80.6 million in financing activities compared to generating nil for the same period in 2024.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
||
|
|
(in thousands) |
||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from public offering of shares in connection with follow on, net of issuance costs |
|
$ |
80,511 |
|
$ |
— |
Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares related to employee stock option and purchase plans |
|
|
159 |
|
|
— |
Net cash generated from financing activities |
|
$ |
80,670 |
|
$ |
— |
Funding requirements
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including but not limited to:
● | activities related to submission of a BLA for AMT-130 in Huntington’s disease; |
● | activities to prepare for the commercialization of AMT-130 in Huntington’s disease in the United States; |
● | investments to launch AMT-130 in Huntington’s disease in the United States including the amounts of revenue we generate following the launch; |
● | earnout payments we might owe the former shareholders of uniQure France SAS, which are subject to the achievement of specific development and regulatory milestones; |
● | contractual milestone payments and royalties we might be owed in accordance with the CSL Behring Agreement; |
● | the scope, timing, results, and costs of our current and planned clinical trials; |
● | the scope, obligations and restrictions on our business related to our existing equity, debt or royalty monetization financings and underlying agreements; |
● | the extent to which we acquire or in-license other businesses, products, product candidates or technologies; |
● | the scope, timing, results and costs of preclinical development and laboratory testing of our additional product candidates; |
● | the need for additional resources and related recruitment costs to support the preclinical and clinical development of our product candidates; |
● | the need for any additional tests, studies, or trials beyond those originally anticipated to confirm the safety or efficacy of our product candidates and technologies; |
● | the cost, timing and outcome of regulatory reviews associated with our product candidates; |
● | our ability to enter into collaboration arrangements in the future; and |
● | the costs and timing of preparing, filing, expanding, acquiring, licensing, maintaining, enforcing, and prosecuting patents and patent applications, as well as defending any intellectual property-related claims. |
29
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to a variety of financial risks in the normal course of our business, including market risk (including currency, price, and interest rate risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. Our overall risk management program focuses on the preservation of capital and the unpredictability of financial markets and has sought to minimize potential adverse effects on our financial performance and position.
Our market risks and exposures to such market risks during the three months ended March 31, 2025, have not materially changed from our market risks and our exposure to market risk discussed in Part II, Item 7A of our Annual Report.
Item 4.Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer (“CEO”) and chief financial officer (“CFO”), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of March 31, 2025. Based on such evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that as of March 31, 2025, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by it in reports the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such material information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Furthermore, the Company’s controls and procedures can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of such control, and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected on a timely basis.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Part II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.Legal Proceedings
None.
30
Item 1A.Risk Factors
An investment in our ordinary shares involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following information about these risks, together with the other information appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including our financial statements and related notes thereto, and the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report, before deciding to invest in our ordinary shares. We operate in a dynamic and rapidly changing industry that involves numerous risks and uncertainties. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Other risks and uncertainties, including those that we do not currently consider material, may impair our business. If any of the risks discussed below actually occur, our business, financial condition, operating results, or cash flows could be materially adversely affected. This could cause the value of our securities to decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Summary Risk Factors
The following is a summary of the principal risks associated with an investment in our ordinary shares:
● | We are dependent on the success of our lead product candidate, AMT-130, for the treatment of Huntington’s disease. A failure of AMT-130 in clinical development, including inability to demonstrate sufficient safety or efficacy, or challenges associated with its regulatory approval, manufacturing or commercialization could adversely affect our business. |
● | We have encountered and may encounter future delays in and impediments to the progress of our clinical trials or fail to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates. |
● | Our progress in early-stage clinical trials may not be predictive of long-term efficacy in late-stage clinical trials, and our progress in trials for one product candidate may not be predictive of progress in trials for other product candidates. |
● | If we are unable to successfully commercialize our product candidates or experience significant delays in doing so, our business could be materially harmed. |
● | Any approved gene therapy we seek to commercialize may fail to achieve the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients, third party payers and others in the medical community necessary for commercial success. |
● | Interim or preliminary results from our clinical trials may change as more data become available, as such data are subject to regulatory audit and verification procedures, and regulatory review, which could result in material changes in the final results and conclusions. |
● | We cannot predict when or if we will obtain marketing approval to commercialize our product candidates. |
● | The risks associated with the marketing approval process are heightened by the status of our products as gene therapies. |
● | We may leverage certain specialized regulatory pathways and designations, such as the FDA’s accelerated approval pathway and RMAT designation, to develop our product candidates or to seek licensure. Even if one or more of our product candidates receives such a designation or is permitted to pursue such a pathway, we may be unable to obtain and maintain the benefits associated with such designations and pathways. |
● | Negative public opinion and increased regulatory scrutiny of gene therapy and genetic research may damage the public perception of our product candidates or adversely affect our ability to conduct our business or obtain marketing approvals for our product candidates. |
● | Our business development and strategic initiatives, including divestitures such as the Lexington Transaction, acquisitions, partnerships, collaborations or other transactions, may not achieve their intended benefits or goals and may result in additional risks to our business. |
● | We may not be successful in obtaining rights from external parties to new product candidates and key technologies, or in securing partnerships to support the development or commercialization of our product candidates. |
● | The Lexington Transaction may not yield the benefits that we expect and may result in additional risks to our business, including those related to Genezen’s ability to manufacture HEMGENIX in accordance with regulatory requirements and to meet CSL Behring’s supply requirements for commercial product. |
● | Gene therapies are complex, expensive and difficult to manufacture. Genezen or any third-party manufacturer that we engage could experience capacity, production or technology transfer challenges that could result in delays in our development or commercialization schedules or otherwise adversely affect our business. |
31
● | The manufacturing of our products and product candidates is subject to significant government regulations and approvals. We currently rely and expect to continue to rely on third parties to manufacture our product candidates, and these third parties may not perform satisfactorily or may fail to comply with these regulations or maintain these approvals. |
● | We had net losses in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, have incurred significant losses in previous years and expect to incur losses in the future, and may never achieve or maintain profitability. |
● | There may be future changes in legal and regulatory requirements that may materially impact our results of operations. |
● | The market price of our ordinary shares has been and may in the future be volatile and fluctuate substantially. |
● | We will need to raise additional funding in order to advance the development of our product candidates and support the commercial launch of AMT-130, which may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain capital when needed may force us to delay, limit or terminate our product development efforts or other operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. |
● | Our future success depends on our ability to retain key executives, technical staff, and other employees and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. |
● | We face substantial competition, and others may discover, develop, or commercialize competing products before or more successfully than we do. |
Risks Related to Our Business and the Development of Our Product Candidates
We are dependent on the success of our lead product candidate, AMT-130, for the treatment of Huntington’s disease. A failure of AMT-130 in clinical development, including inability to demonstrate sufficient safety or efficacy, or challenges associated with its regulatory approval, manufacturing or commercialization could adversely affect our business.
We have invested a significant portion of our development efforts and financial resources in the development of our lead clinical product candidate, AMT-130 for the treatment of Huntington’s disease. In July 2024, we announced updated interim data from our ongoing Phase I/II clinical trials of AMT-130. This interim data follows notification from FDA in May 2024 that the agency granted RMAT designation for AMT-130 based on AMT-130’s potential to address the major unmet medical need among patients with Huntington’s disease. In addition, in December 2024, following our initial Type B meeting, we announced that we had reached agreement with FDA on key elements of an Accelerated Approval pathway for AMT-130, including that data from the ongoing Phase I/II studies of AMT-130, compared to a natural history external control, may serve as the primary basis for a BLA submission under FDA’s Accelerated Approval pathway. FDA also agreed that cUHDRS may be used as an intermediate clinical endpoint and that reductions in NfL measured in CSF may serve as supportive evidence of therapeutic benefit in the application for accelerated approval.
We have initiated BLA-readiness activities and have had additional interactions with the FDA in March and April 2025 to discuss the pivotal statistical analysis plan and CMC requirements for a BLA submission. In addition, in April 2025, we announced that the FDA has granted Breakthrough Therapy designation to AMT-130. This designation is in addition to the FDA’s previously granted RMAT, Orphan Drug and Fast Track designations for the AMT-130 program. Breakthrough Therapy designation is intended to expedite the development and review of investigational therapeutic candidates that are intended to treat a serious condition and for which preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over available therapy on a clinically significant endpoint(s) by ensuring that drug is eligible for all Fast Track designation features, intensive guidance on an efficient drug development program, and FDA commitment involving senior managers.
32
There are numerous factors that could impede or otherwise negatively impact our further development of AMT-130, including, but not limited to, potential patient safety issues; our failure to demonstrate sufficient clinical efficacy or durability of response data to warrant further development or accelerated approval by FDA, EMA or any other regulatory authority; our ability to achieve alignment with FDA and other regulatory authorities on the pivotal statistical analysis plan and CMC requirements to support registration, the timing of such regulatory alignment and other factors impacting our interactions with FDA which may be outside of our control; the results from future interim data readouts from our Phase I/II trial, including the three-year follow-up data from treated patients and safety and tolerability data from the third cohort; any requirement for a Phase III confirmatory study; the timing and resources associated with our planned marketing applications; our ability to successfully commercialize AMT-130 should we choose to do so without a partner; challenges with potential development or commercial partners, should we choose to pursue further development or commercialization of AMT-130 with a partner; and our ability to fund the further development and commercialization of the AMT-130 program.
Any one or combination of these factors could force us to halt or discontinue the ongoing clinical trials of AMT-130 or related commercialization efforts. Certain of these risk factors are heightened in the context of drug development for rare diseases like Huntington’s disease and novel investigational products like gene therapies in which non-traditional study designs are utilized to demonstrate efficacy and safety, including open-label studies, single arm studies, studies utilizing active comparators or natural history data, biomarkers or other forms of surrogate endpoints, which may be utilized due to the challenges inherent in designing and conducting clinical trials for severe diseases that progress slowly and that affect small patient populations.
Notwithstanding alignment with FDA on key elements of the accelerated approval pathway, we cannot be certain that AMT-130, or any of our product candidates, will be successful in clinical trials or receive regulatory approval. If we were required to, or if we chose to, discontinue development of AMT-130 or any other current or future product candidates, or if any of them were to fail to receive regulatory approval or achieve sufficient market acceptance, we could be prevented from or significantly delayed in achieving profitability and our business would be adversely affected.
We have encountered and may encounter future delays in and impediments to the progress of our clinical trials or fail to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates.
Drug development is expensive, time-consuming, and uncertain as to the outcome. Our product candidates are in different stages of clinical or preclinical development, and there is a significant risk of failure or delay in each of these programs. We are currently conducting Phase I/II clinical trials in the U.S. and Europe for AMT-130, our investigational gene therapy for the treatment of Huntington’s disease. In June 2024, we announced that the FDA granted Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (“RMAT”) designation for AMT-130 based on the potential of AMT-130 to address the major unmet medical need among patients with Huntington’s disease. Following our initial Type B meeting with the FDA, we announced in December 2024 that we had reached agreement with FDA on key elements of an accelerated approval pathway for AMT-130 and have initiated BLA readiness activities based on this regulatory alignment. In addition, in April 2025, we announced that the FDA had granted Breakthrough Therapy designation to AMT-130. We are also advancing three other product candidates through Phase I/II clinical development – AMT-260 for the treatment of mTLE, AMT-162 for the treatment of SOD1-ALS, and AMT-191 for the treatment of Fabry disease.
We have experienced clinical setbacks in the past and may experience setbacks in the future. For example, we experienced an immaterial but unexpected delay when our clinical trials of HEMGENIX® were placed on clinical hold by the FDA from December 2020 to April 2021 following a preliminary diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in one patient. Similarly, we experienced an unexpected delay in the enrollment of our Phase Ib/II clinical trial of AMT-130 for the treatment of Huntington’s disease between July and October 2022 due to our voluntary postponement and comprehensive safety investigation into suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions in three patients.
33
A failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage and for a variety of reasons that we cannot predict with accuracy and that are out of our control. Events that may prevent successful or timely completion of clinical development, as well as product candidate approval, include, but are not limited to:
● | occurrence of serious adverse events associated with a product candidate that are viewed to outweigh its potential benefits; |
● | insufficient number of patients treated with the product candidate or an insufficient study period for assessing the effectiveness of the product candidate; |
● | failures or delays in reaching agreement with regulatory agencies on study design, particularly with respect to our novel gene therapies for which regulatory pathways remain untested; |
● | failures or delays in hiring sufficient personnel with the requisite expertise to execute multiple clinical programs simultaneously; |
● | failures or delays in reaching agreement on acceptable terms with clinical research organizations (“CROs”) and clinical trial sites; |
● | failures or delays in identifying and recruiting patients in our clinical studies; |
● | delays in receiving regulatory authorization to conduct our clinical trials or a regulatory authority decision that the clinical trial should not proceed; |
● | failures or delays in obtaining or failure to obtain required IRB and IBC approval at each clinical trial site; |
● | requirements of regulatory authorities, IRBs, or IBCs to modify a study in such a way that it makes the study impracticable to conduct; |
● | regulatory authority requirements to perform additional or unanticipated clinical trials or testing; |
● | changes in standards of care which may necessitate the modification of our clinical trials or the conduct of new trials; |
● | regulatory authority refusal to accept data from foreign clinical study sites; |
● | disagreements with regulatory authorities regarding our study design, including endpoints, our chosen indication, our chosen bases for comparison as it relates to measurements of clinical efficacy, our interpretation and statistical analyses of data collected from preclinical studies and clinical trials; |
● | recommendations from DSMBs to discontinue, pause, or modify the trial; |
● | imposition of a clinical hold by regulatory agencies after an inspection of our clinical trial operations or trial sites; |
● | suspension or termination of clinical research for various reasons, including noncompliance with regulatory requirements or a finding that the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks, undesirable side effects, or other unexpected characteristics (alone or in combination with other products) of the product candidate, or due to findings of undesirable effects caused by a chemically or mechanistically similar therapeutic or therapeutic candidate; |
● | failure by CROs, other third parties or us to adhere to clinical trial requirements or otherwise properly manage the clinical trial process, including meeting applicable timelines, properly documenting case files, including the retention of proper case files, and properly monitoring and auditing clinical sites; |
● | failure of sites or clinical investigators to perform in accordance with Good Clinical Practice or applicable regulatory guidelines in other countries; |
● | failure of patients to abide by clinical trial requirements; |
● | delays or deviations in the testing, validation, manufacturing, and delivery of our product candidates to the clinical sites; |
● | delays in having patients complete participation in a study or return for post-treatment follow-up; |
● | clinical trial sites or patients dropping out of a study; |
● | the number of patients required for clinical trials of our product candidates being larger than we anticipate; |
● | clinical trials producing negative or inconclusive results, or our studies failing to reach the necessary level of statistical significance, requiring that we conduct additional clinical trials or abandon development programs; |
● | interruptions in manufacturing clinical supply of our product candidates or issues with product candidates failing to meet the necessary quality requirements; |
● | unanticipated clinical trial costs or insufficient funding, including paying substantial application user fees; |
● | emergence of new information about or impacting our product candidates or the field of gene therapy; |
● | determinations that there are issues with our third-party manufacturers or their facilities or processes; or |
● | changes in regulatory requirements and guidance, as well as new, revised, postponed, or frozen regulatory requirements (such as the EU Clinical Trials Regulation), that require amending or submitting new clinical protocols, undertaking additional new tests or analyses, or submitting new types or amounts of clinical data. |
34
Before obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of our product candidates, we must conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in humans. Such trials, regulatory review and approval take many years. Our clinical trials may never yield results that demonstrate that our product candidates are effective or safe in humans. If the results of our clinical trials are inconclusive, or fail to meet the level of statistical significance required for regulatory approval, or if there are safety concerns, concerns around efficacy or durability of response or other adverse events associated with our product candidates, we may:
● | be delayed in or altogether prevented from obtaining marketing approval for our product candidates; |
● | obtain approval for indications or patient populations that are not as broad as intended or desired; |
● | obtain approval with labeling that includes significant use or distribution restrictions, safety warnings, labeling statements or contraindications; |
● | be subject to changes in the way our products are administered; |
● | be required to perform additional clinical trials to support approval or be subject to additional post-marketing testing requirements; |
● | have regulatory authorities withdraw their approval of the product or impose restrictions on its distribution in the form of a modified risk evaluation and mitigation strategy; |
● | be subject to legal action or other challenges; or |
● | experience reputational damage. |
Because of the nature of the gene therapies we are developing, regulators may also require us to demonstrate long-term gene expression, clinical efficacy, and safety, which may require additional or longer clinical trials that we may not have sufficient resources to conduct or for which we may not be able to meet the regulatory authorities’ standards.
Our ability to recruit patients for our clinical trials is heavily reliant on third parties. Clinical trial sites may not have the adequate infrastructure established to handle the administration of our gene therapy products, related surgeries or other means of product administration, or may have difficulty finding eligible patients to enroll into our clinical trials, which may delay or impede our planned trials and development timelines. In addition, neither we nor any of our collaborators may be able to identify and enroll sufficient eligible patients to participate in these trials as required by the FDA, the EMA or other regulatory authorities. This may result in our failure to initiate or continue clinical trials for our product candidates or may cause us to abandon one or more clinical trials altogether. Because several of our programs are focused on the treatment of patients with rare or orphan or ultra-orphan diseases, our ability to enroll eligible patients in these trials may be limited or slower than we anticipate considering the small patient populations involved and the age range required for trial eligibility for certain indications. In addition, our potential competitors, including major pharmaceutical, specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic institutions and governmental agencies and public and private research institutions, may seek to develop competing therapies, which would further limit the small patient pool available for our studies. Patients may also be reluctant to enroll in clinical trials for gene therapy candidates where other therapeutic alternatives are available due uncertainty about the safety or effectiveness gene therapies and the possibility that treatment with one gene therapy could preclude future gene therapy treatments due to the formation of antibodies following and in response to the treatment, or other unknown factors associated with novel therapeutics.
35
Our inability to successfully initiate or complete preclinical and clinical studies could result in additional costs to us or impair our ability to receive marketing approval, to generate revenues from product sales or from reaching certain development milestones, or obtain regulatory approval. In addition, if we make manufacturing or formulation changes to our product candidates, including changes in the vector or manufacturing process used, we may need to conduct additional studies to bridge our modified product candidates to earlier versions. It is also possible that any such manufacturing or formulation changes may have an adverse impact on the performance of the product candidate. Clinical trial delays could also shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates or allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do, which could impair our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates and may materially harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our progress in early-stage clinical trials may not be predictive of long-term efficacy in late-stage clinical trials, and our progress in trials for one product candidate may not be predictive of progress in trials for other product candidates.
Our product candidates may fail to show the required level of safety and efficacy in later stages of clinical development despite having successfully advanced through initial clinical studies. For example, the interim results from our ongoing Phase I/II clinical trials of AMT-130, our product candidate targeting Huntington’s disease, may not be predictive of the results of future interim analyses or later-stage trials. In some instances, there can be significant variability in safety or efficacy results between different clinical trials of the same product candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in trial procedures set forth in protocols, differences in the size and type of the patient populations, changes in and adherence to the clinical trial protocols and the rate of dropout among clinical trial participants. Moreover, should there be an issue with the design of any of our clinical trials, our results may be impacted. We may not discover such a flaw until the clinical trial is at an advanced stage. Changes to product candidates or how the results from our clinical trials are analyzed, whether as a result of regulatory feedback or changes in clinical trial procedures and protocols, may also impact the results of subsequent analyses or studies.
A number of companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in later-stage clinical trials even after achieving promising results in early-stage clinical trials. If a larger population of patients does not experience positive results during our clinical trials, if the results are not reproducible or if our products show diminishing activity over time, our product candidates may not receive approval from the FDA, EMA or comparable regulatory authorities, or may have conditional approvals revoked. Data obtained from preclinical and clinical activities may be subject to varying interpretations and analyses, which may delay, limit, or prevent regulatory approval. In addition, we may encounter regulatory delays or rejections due to shifting political priorities, resulting changes in regulatory agencies or other changes in regulatory policy during the period of product development. Failure to confirm favorable results from earlier trials by demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of our products in later-stage clinical trials with larger patient populations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Additionally, we are currently conducting and may in the future conduct clinical trials that utilize an “open-label” trial design. An “open-label” clinical trial is one where both the patient and investigator know whether the patient is receiving the investigational therapeutic candidate (as opposed to an existing approved drug or placebo). Open-label trials typically test only the investigational therapeutic candidate and sometimes may do so at different dose levels. For example, our ongoing Phase I/II clinical trial of AMT-130 is designed as an open-label trial following a 12-month core study period during which certain patients received a sham surgical procedure. Certain of these patients crossed over to treatment with AMT-130 and are now subject to long-term, unblinded follow-up monitoring for a period of five years. Open-label trials are subject to various limitations that may bias the interpretation of the data. Open-label trials may be subject to a “patient bias” where patients perceive their symptoms to have improved merely due to their awareness of receiving an experimental treatment. In addition, open-label trials may be subject to an “investigator bias” where those assessing and reviewing the physiological outcomes of the clinical trials are aware of which patients have received treatment and may interpret the information of the treated group more favorably given this knowledge. Accordingly, the results from our open-label trials, including early indications of potential efficacy, may not be predictive of future clinical trial results. Early evidence of slowing of disease progression in our AMT-130 clinical trial may not be predictive of continued evidence of potential efficacy as we continue to collect follow-up data from patients enrolled in the trial.
36
Interim or preliminary results from our clinical trials may change as more data become available, as such data are subject to regulatory audit and verification procedures, and regulatory review, which could result in material changes in the final results and conclusions.
From time to time, we publicly disclose interim, preliminary or other data from preclinical studies and clinical trials, which are based on a preliminary and sometimes post hoc analysis of such data. With respect to interim and preliminary data, the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data, the particular study, or trial. We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations, and conclusions as part of our preliminary or interim analyses of data, and we may not have received or had the opportunity to evaluate all data at that time. As a result, the interim or preliminary data that we report may differ from future results of the same studies, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Interim or preliminary data also remain subject to regulatory audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, preliminary or interim data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available.
For example, in July 2024, we announced updated interim data from our ongoing Phase I/II clinical trials of AMT-130, along with our expectation that we will present additional clinical updates with respect to AMT-130 in the future. As part of the July 2024 update, we announced a statistically significant, dose-dependent, slowing in disease progression for high-dose patients dosed with AMT-130, as measured by cUHDRS, as well as a statistically significant reduction of NfL in CSF. Such measures of statistical significance were based on a post-hoc analysis of data from patients treated with AMT-130 compared to a propensity score-weighted external control cohort. Interim data from our clinical trials, including the AMT-130 trial, and our analyses of that data are subject to the risk that one or more of our interim conclusions may materially change as more patient data become available and as regulatory interactions focused on statistical analysis of the clinical data progress, among other factors. Significant differences between interim data and subsequent data could change the nature of our conclusions with respect to the safety and efficacy of our product candidates, which could adversely impact our business.
We have and may in the future disclose interim results based on post-hoc analyses, the pooling of data from multiple studies, or using statistical assessments or comparisons, including comparisons to historical controls, which regulatory authorities may not agree with. The FDA may find that calculations of statistical significance using nominal p-values are not sufficiently reliable or subject to certain statistical limitations and, as a result, determine that our preliminary results are insufficient evidence of clinical efficacy.
Accordingly, third parties, including regulatory agencies, may not accept or agree with our assumptions, estimates, calculations, conclusions, or analyses or may interpret or weigh the importance of data differently, which could negatively impact the value of the particular program, its prospects for approval and our business. In December 2024, following our initial Type B meeting, we announced that we had reached agreement with FDA on key elements of an accelerated approval pathway for AMT-130, including that data from the ongoing Phase I/II studies of AMT-130, compared to a natural history external control, may serve as the primary basis for a BLA submission under FDA’s Accelerated Approval pathway. FDA also agreed that cUHDRS may be used as an intermediate clinical endpoint and that reductions in NfL measured in CSF may serve as supportive evidence of therapeutic benefit in the application for accelerated approval. Notwithstanding alignment with the agency on these elements, and notwithstanding our recent receipt of Breakthrough Designation for the AMT-130 program, we may fail to continue to demonstrate clinical efficacy or durability of response data to warrant further development or accelerated approval by FDA, EMA or any other regulatory authority.
In addition, the information we choose to publicly disclose regarding a particular study or clinical trial may be top-line results based on what is typically extensive information, and others may not agree with what we determine is the material or otherwise appropriate information to include in our public disclosures. Any information we determine not to disclose may ultimately be deemed significant by others with respect to future decisions, conclusions, views, activities or otherwise regarding a particular product candidate or our business. If the preliminary or interim data that we report differ from final results, or if others, including regulatory authorities, disagree with the conclusions reached, our ability to obtain approval for, and commercialize, product candidates may be harmed, which could seriously harm our business.
37
Data analyses conducted on a post-hoc basis and using external, historical controls may not be accepted as a basis for regulatory approval.
We have in the past and may in the future undertake certain analyses to further understand the data and potential reasons for the study results, including retrospective, post-hoc, and subgroup analyses. Because these analyses are not pre-planned and studies may not be adequately designed for these analyses, they may not be a reliable nor an acceptable basis for regulatory approval. For example, in conjunction with our July 2024 interim data update for AMT-130, we conducted a post-hoc analysis of clinical outcomes for the 21 treated patients at 24 months compared to an expanded, propensity-weighted external control consisting of 154 patients. Among other conclusions in this interim update, we reported, based on this analysis, a statistically significant, dose-dependent, slowing in disease progression measured by cUHDRS observed through 24 months in patients receiving the high dose of AMT-130. We also reported a statistically significant reduction of CSF NfL observed in patients treated with AMT-130.
Some of our favorable statistical data from these trials also are based on nominal p-values. Nominal p-values are subject to certain limitations, and because of these limitations, regulatory authorities may give less weight to nominal p-values, compared to standard p-values. As such, we anticipate proposing to the FDA a pre-specified statistical analysis to support a potential BLA submission. An unfavorable view of our proposed statistical analyses by regulatory authorities could negatively impact our ability to obtain, or the timing of, regulatory approval, which would have a material adverse effect on our revenue and adversely impact our business and financial results.
We are making use of exploratory biomarkers and other data that are not scientifically validated, and our reliance on these data may lead us to direct our resources inefficiently.
We are making use of experimental biological markers, or biomarkers, in an effort to facilitate our drug development and to optimize our clinical trials. Biomarkers are proteins or other substances which can serve as an indicator of specific cell processes or as evidence of a patient’s biological response to drug product administration. For example, with respect to our ongoing clinical trials of AMT-130, we are measuring NfL in CSF as a potential indicator of neurodegeneration, as well as changes in total brain volume of patients treated with AMT-130.
While we believe that these biomarkers and data may serve useful purposes for us, including in the evaluation of whether our product candidates are having their intended effects through their assumed mechanisms of action, improving patient selection and monitoring patient compliance with trial protocols, these biomarkers and data have not been scientifically validated and are considered experimental as used in our trials. If our understanding and use of biomarkers is inaccurate or flawed, or if our reliance on specific biomarkers such as CSF NfL is otherwise misplaced, then we may fail to realize any benefits from using these data and may also be led to invest time and financial resources inefficiently in attempting to develop inappropriate drug candidates.
We may not be successful in our efforts to use our gene therapy technology platform to build a pipeline of additional product candidates or otherwise leverage our research and technology to remain competitive.
We seek to use our gene therapy technology platform to expand our product pipeline and to progress our product candidates through preclinical and clinical development ourselves or together with collaborators. To date, we have only been successful in obtaining regulatory approval for one product, HEMGENIX®, our gene therapy for the treatment of hemophilia B, which was approved for commercialization by the FDA and the EMA in November 2022 and February 2023, respectively. AMT-130 is our investigational gene therapy candidate for the treatment of Huntington’s disease that utilizes our proprietary, gene-silencing miQURE platform and incorporates an AAV vector carrying a miRNA specifically designed to silence the huntingtin gene and the potentially highly toxic exon 1 protein fragment, which is currently in ongoing Phase I/II studies in the U.S. and Europe. In addition to AMT-130, we are also developing other investigational gene therapies, including AMT-260 for the treatment of mTLE, AMT-162 for the treatment of SOD1-ALS and AMT-191 for the treatment of Fabry disease. Although we currently have a pipeline of programs at various stages of development, including an approved product for which commercialization has been exclusively out-licensed to CSL Behring, we may not be successful in identifying or developing additional products that are safe and effective. Even if we are successful in continuing to build our pipeline, the potential new product candidates that we identify may not be suitable for or may fail in clinical development.
38
Research programs to identify new product candidates require substantial technical, financial, and human resources. Due to the significant resources required for the development of our product candidates, we must decide which product candidates to pursue and advance and the resources to allocate to each. Our decisions concerning the allocation of research, development, collaboration, management, and financial resources toward particular programs and product candidates, including the decisions stemming from our prior restructuring efforts, may not lead to the development of any viable commercial product and may divert resources away from other value-driving opportunities. If we do not continue to successfully develop and commercialize product candidates based upon our technology, we may face difficulty in obtaining product revenues in future periods, which could result in significant harm to our business, results of operations and financial position and materially adversely affect our share price.
We may not be successful in obtaining rights from external parties to new product candidates and key technologies, or in securing partnerships to support the development or commercialization of our product candidates.
We may expand our product pipeline from time to time through strategic transactions that involve in-licensing the rights to key technologies, including those related to gene delivery, genes, and gene cassettes. For example, in July 2021, we acquired uniQure France (formerly Corlieve Therapeutics SAS) and its lead program, now known as AMT-260, to treat refractory MTLE. AMT-260 is being developed based on exclusive licenses to certain patents uniQure France obtained from two French research institutions. uniQure France also obtained an exclusive license from Regenxbio, Inc. to use AAV9 in connection with the delivery of any sequence that affects the expression of the GRIK2 gene in humans. Notwithstanding prior efforts to expand our product pipeline, the cost of drug development is high as is the rate of failure in the drug development process. In order to fund the development of our existing product candidates, including the costs associated with submitting a BLA for AMT-130 and related commercial planning and readiness activities, we may seek to out-license some of our product candidates or technologies to other pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies or other third parties to generate non-dilutive funds in the form of up-front or milestone payments or royalties. Such decisions will be taken on a case-by-case basis, as the opportunity arises or is required.
The future success of our business will depend in significant part on our business development efforts with respect to existing and future product candidates, including our ability to in-license or otherwise acquire the rights to additional product candidates or technologies, particularly through our collaborations with academic research institutions, and our ability to out-license product candidates and technologies for which collaboration with external parties forms a part of our business strategy or is necessary to cover certain development costs. However, we may be unable to in-license or acquire the rights to any such product candidates or technologies from third parties on acceptable terms or at all. The in-licensing and acquisition of gene therapy technologies is a competitive area, and many more established companies are also pursuing strategies to license or acquire product candidates or technologies that we may consider attractive. These established companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their size, cash resources or superior clinical development and commercialization capabilities. In addition, companies that perceive us to be competitors may be unwilling to license rights to us. Furthermore, we may be unable to identify suitable product candidates or technologies within our areas of focus. If we are unable to successfully obtain rights to suitable product candidates or technologies, our business, financial condition, and prospects could suffer.
Similarly, there is no guarantee that we will generate product candidates that are suitable for out-licensing or attractive to potential collaborators, and even if we do, there is no guarantee that we will be successful in identifying potential licensees and successfully negotiating such collaborations on agreeable terms if and when required. Any failure with respect to our business development efforts may materially affect our ability to finance our business and support the development of our product pipeline.
39
Negative public opinion and increased regulatory scrutiny of gene therapy and genetic research may damage the public perception of our product candidates or adversely affect our ability to conduct our business or obtain marketing approvals for our product candidates.
Gene therapy remains a novel technology. Our technology utilizes vectors derived from viruses, which may be perceived as unsafe or may result in unforeseen adverse events. Public perception may be influenced by claims that gene therapies are unsafe, and gene therapies may not ultimately gain the acceptance of the public or the medical community. The risk of cancer remains a concern for gene therapy, and we cannot guarantee that patients treated in any of our planned or future clinical studies will not develop cancer or experience other adverse events as a result of being treated with our product candidates. In addition, there is the potential risk of delayed adverse events following exposure to gene therapy products due to persistent biological activity of the genetic material or other components of products used to carry the genetic material.
Public and medical community adoption of any of our gene therapies will depend on other factors, including the ease of administration in comparison to other therapeutics and the extent to which our therapies are successful in slowing disease progression if not acting as a cure for the disease. For example, the need for lengthy and complex surgeries for the administration of a product candidate may impact the acceptance of a product. In particular, our success will depend upon physicians who specialize in the treatment of genetic diseases targeted by our products prescribing treatments that involve the use of our products in lieu of, or in addition to, existing treatments with which they are familiar and for which greater clinical data may be available.
More restrictive government regulation of gene therapies or negative public opinion may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects and may delay or impair the development and commercialization of our product candidates or demand for any products we may develop. For example, earlier gene therapy trials led to several well-publicized adverse events, including cases of leukemia and death seen in other trials using other vectors.
Serious adverse events in our clinical trials, or other clinical trials involving gene therapy products or our competitors’ products, even if not ultimately attributable to the relevant product candidates, and the resulting publicity, could result in increased government regulation, unfavorable public perception, potential regulatory delays in the testing or approval of our product candidates, stricter labeling requirements for those product candidates that are approved and a decrease in demand for any products for which we obtain marketing approval. A small number of patients experienced serious adverse events during our clinical trials of AMT-060 (HEMGENIX®), etranacogene dezaparvovec (AMT-061), and AMT-130. However, adverse events in our clinical trials or those conducted by third parties (even if not ultimately attributable to our product candidates), and the resulting publicity, could result in delay, a hold or termination of our clinical trials, increased governmental regulation, unfavorable public perception, failure of the medical community to accept and prescribe gene therapy treatments, potential regulatory delays in the testing or approval of our product candidates, stricter labeling requirements for those product candidates that are approved and a decrease in demand for any such product candidates. If any of these events should occur, it may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We face substantial competition, and others may discover, develop, or commercialize competing products before or more successfully than we do.
The development and commercialization of new biotechnology and biopharmaceutical products, including gene therapies, is highly competitive. We face intense competition with respect to our current and future product candidates from large and specialty pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies worldwide, who, like us, currently market and sell products or are pursuing the development of products for the treatment of rare diseases. Potential competitors also include academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations that conduct research, seek patent protection, and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing, and commercialization. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in commercial and scientific interest and financial investment in gene therapy as a therapeutic approach, which has intensified the competition in this area.
40
We face worldwide competition from larger pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology firms, universities and other research institutions and government agencies that are developing and commercializing pharmaceutical products. Our key competitors focused on developing therapies in various indications, include among others, PTC Therapeutics, Roche, Wave Life Sciences, Alnylum Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron and Skyhawk Therapeutics (for Huntington’s disease), Neurona and Combigene (for TLE), Biogen, Ionis, Neurimmune, Regeneron, Alnylum Pharmaceuticals and Voyager Therapeutics (for ALS) and Amicus Therapeutics, Sanofi, Takeda, Chiesi, Idorsia, Sangamo Therapeutics, 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Skyline Pharmaceuticals and CANbridge (for Fabry disease).
Our commercial opportunity and/or the receipt of royalties from the sale of any approved products (should we chose to commercialize our products with a commercial partner) could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, are more convenient or are less expensive than the products that we develop. Our competitors also may obtain FDA, EMA, or other regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than we do, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market. A competitor approval may also prevent us from entering the market if the competitor receives any regulatory exclusivities that block our product candidates. Because we expect that gene therapy patients may generally require only a single administration, we believe that the first gene therapy product to enter the market for a particular indication will likely enjoy a significant commercial advantage and may also obtain market exclusivity under applicable orphan drug regimes.
Many of the companies with which we are competing or may compete in the future have significantly greater financial resources and expertise than we do in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals, and marketing approved products. Moreover, actions taken in connection with our prior restructuring efforts to streamline our product portfolio may hamper our ability to remain competitive. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller and other early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.
Certain of our product candidates may require medical devices for product administration and/or diagnostics, resulting in our product candidates being deemed combination products or otherwise being dependent upon additional regulatory approvals. This may result in the need to comply with additional regulatory requirements. If we are unable to meet these regulatory requirements, we may be delayed or not be able to obtain product approval.
Certain of our product candidates require medical devices for administration, such as AMT-130 and AMT-260, each of which requires a stereotactic, magnetic resonance imaging guided catheter. Other of our product candidates may also require the use of a companion diagnostic device to confirm the presence of specific genetic or other biomarkers. In addition, certain of our product candidates, including AMT-130 and AMT-260, may require the use of immunosuppressive agents to reduce the inflammatory responses associated with administration.
It is possible that our product candidates would be deemed to be combination products, potentially necessitating compliance with the FDA’s investigational device regulations, separate marketing application submissions for the medical device component, a demonstration that our product candidates are safe and effective when used in combination with the medical devices, cross-labeling with the medical device, and compliance with certain of the FDA’s device regulations. If we are not able to comply with the FDA’s device regulations, if we are not able to effectively partner with the applicable medical device manufacturers, if we or any partners are not able to obtain any required FDA clearances or approvals of the applicable medical devices, or if we are not able to demonstrate that our product candidates are safe and efficacious when used with the applicable medical devices, we may be delayed in or may never obtain FDA approval for our product candidates, which would materially harm our business.
41
Moreover, certain of our delivery modalities, such as direct delivery of product candidates to the brain, may require significant time and physician ability and skill. If physicians are not able to effectively deliver our product candidates to the applicable site of action or if delivery modalities are too difficult, or if there is reluctance to administer immunosuppressive agents that are outside of the standard of care to treat immune responses from the administration of our therapies, we may never be able to obtain approval for our product candidates, may be delayed in obtaining approval, or, following approval, physicians may not adopt our product candidates, any of which may materially harm our business.
Risks Related to Regulatory Approval of Our Products
We cannot predict when or if we will obtain marketing approval to commercialize our product candidates.
The development and commercialization of our product candidates, including their design, testing, manufacture, safety, efficacy, purity, recordkeeping, labeling, storage, approval, advertising, promotion, sale, and distribution, are subject to comprehensive regulation by the FDA and other regulatory agencies in the U.S., the EMA, and other regulatory agencies of the member states of the European Union, and similar regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions. Failure to obtain marketing approval for a product candidate in a specific jurisdiction will prevent us from commercializing the product candidate in that jurisdiction and our ability to generate revenue will be materially impaired.
The process of obtaining marketing approval for our product candidates in the U.S., the European Union, and other countries is expensive and may take many years, if approval is obtained at all. Changes in marketing approval policies during the development period, changes in or the enactment of additional statutes or regulations, reductions in staffing or other personnel limitations within a regulatory agency, including recent staffing changes within the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, or changes in regulatory review for each submitted product application, may cause delays in the approval or rejection of an application. Due to the recent change in presidential administration in the U.S., we face substantial uncertainty regarding potential regulatory developments that may adversely affect our business, including those related to potential decreases in spending in the federal government, staffing reductions, or any other potential constraints on the FDA’s ability to engage in routine oversight and product review activities (including review activities for product candidates like AMT-130 that are subject to accelerated approval pathways) or its ability to exercise regulatory authority. Regulatory authorities may also be delayed in completing their review of any marketing applications submitted by us or our partners. Regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application, may decide that our data are insufficient for approval, may require additional preclinical, clinical, or other studies and may not complete their review in a timely manner. Further, any marketing approval we ultimately obtain may be for only limited indications or be subject to stringent labeling or other restrictions or post-approval commitments that render the approved product not commercially viable.
The risks associated with the marketing approval process are heightened by the status of our products as gene therapies.
We believe that all our current product candidates will be viewed as gene therapy products by the applicable regulatory authorities. While there are several gene therapy product candidates under development in the U.S., the FDA has only approved a limited number of gene therapy products, to date. Accordingly, regulators like the FDA may have limited experience with the review and approval of marketing applications for gene therapy products, which may adversely affect the approval prospects for our product candidates.
Both the FDA and the EMA have demonstrated caution in their regulation of gene therapy treatments, and ethical and legal concerns about gene therapy and genetic testing may result in additional regulations or restrictions on the development and commercialization of our product candidates that are difficult to predict. The FDA and the EMA have issued various guidance documents pertaining to gene therapy products, which are and will be applicable to our product candidates. The close regulatory scrutiny of gene therapy products may result in delays and increased costs and may ultimately lead to the failure to obtain approval for any gene therapy product. Experiences with existing gene therapies, including any emergent adverse effects, could also impact how the FDA and the EMA view our products and product candidates, making it harder to obtain or maintain regulatory approvals.
42
Regulatory requirements affecting gene therapy have changed frequently and continue to evolve, and agencies at both the U.S. federal and state level, as well as congressional committees and foreign governments, have sometimes expressed interest in further regulating biotechnology. In the U.S., there have been a number of changes relating to gene therapy development. By example, FDA issued a number of guidance documents, and continues to issue guidance documents, on human gene therapy development, one of which was specific to human gene therapy for hemophilia, one that was specific to neurodegenerative diseases, and another of which was specific to rare diseases. Under proposed EU legislation, there is also a suggested amendment in relation to advanced therapy medicinal products to the effect that hospital pharmacies would be afforded greater flexibility to prepare product for dispensing on the basis of the estimated prescriptions within that hospital for the following 7 days rather than, as at present, in response to individual prescriptions.
The FDA, EMA, and other regulatory authorities will likely continue to revise and further update their approaches to gene therapies in the coming years. These regulatory agencies, committees and advisory groups and the new regulations and guidelines they promulgate may lengthen the regulatory review process, require us to perform additional studies, increase our development costs, lead to changes in regulatory positions and interpretations, delay or prevent approval and commercialization of our product candidates or lead to significant post-approval limitations or restrictions. Delay or failure to obtain, or unexpected costs in obtaining, the regulatory approval necessary to bring a potential product to market could decrease our ability to generate sufficient product revenues to maintain our business.
We may leverage certain specialized regulatory pathways and designations, such as the FDA’s accelerated approval pathway and RMAT designation, to develop our product candidates or to seek licensure. Even if one or more of our product candidates receives such a designation or is permitted to pursue such a pathway, we may be unable to obtain and maintain the benefits associated with such designations and pathways.
In May 2024 the FDA granted RMAT designation for AMT-130 based on AMT-130’s potential to address the major unmet medical need among patients with Huntington’s disease. The designation followed the FDA’s review of interim Phase I/II clinical data for AMT-130 and was based on an analysis comparing 24-month clinical data from the AMT-130 trials to a non-concurrent criteria-matched natural history cohort. In December 2024, following our initial Type B meeting which was scheduled on the basis of our RMAT designation for AMT-130, we announced that we had reached agreement with FDA on key elements of an accelerated approval pathway for AMT-130. In April 2025, we announced that the FDA had granted Breakthrough Therapy designation to AMT-130. In the future, we may seek additional product designations intended to facilitate the development or regulatory review or approval process for our product candidates, such as fast-track designations, breakthrough therapy designation, RMAT designation, PRIME scheme access or priority review designation for our product candidates.
A fast-track product designation is designed to facilitate the clinical development and expedite the review of drugs intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition and which demonstrate the potential to address an unmet medical need. A breakthrough therapy is defined as a drug that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, where preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. An RMAT designation is designed to accelerate approval for regenerative advanced therapies. Priority review designation is intended to accelerate the FDA marketing application review timeframe for drug products that treat a serious condition and that, if approved, would provide a significant improvement in safety or effectiveness. PRIME is a scheme provided by the EMA, similar to the FDA’s breakthrough therapy designation, to enhance support for the development of medicines that target an unmet medical need.
For drugs and biologics that have been designated as fast track products, RMAT (in the case of AMT-130), or breakthrough therapies, or granted access to the PRIME scheme, more frequent interaction and communication between the regulatory agency and the sponsor of the trial can help to identify the most efficient path for clinical development. Sponsors of fast-track products, RMAT products, or breakthrough therapies may also be able to submit marketing applications on a rolling basis, meaning that the FDA may review portions of a marketing application before the sponsor submits the complete application to the FDA, if the sponsor pays the user fee upon submission of the first portion of the marketing application and the FDA approves a schedule for the submission of the remaining sections. For products that receive a priority review designation, the FDA’s marketing application review goal is shortened to six months, as opposed to ten months under standard review.
43
Designation as a fast-track product, breakthrough therapy, RMAT, PRIME, or priority review product is within the discretion of the regulatory agency. Accordingly, even if we believe one of our product candidates (other than AMT-130) meets the relevant criteria, the agency may disagree and instead determine not to make such a designation. In any event, the receipt of such a designation for a product candidate may not result in a faster development process, review or approval compared to drugs considered for approval under conventional regulatory procedures and does not assure ultimate marketing approval by the agency. In addition, the FDA may later decide that the products no longer meet the applicable conditions for qualification as either a fast-track product, RMAT, or a breakthrough therapy or, for priority review products, decide that the period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened. Moreover, in the U.S., the FDA expects that sponsors with products under these programs will be prepared for a more rapid pace of development, including with respect to manufacturing or any combination medical devices, such as companion diagnostics. If we are unable to meet these expectations, we may not be able to fully avail ourselves of certain advantages of these programs.
Biologics studied for their safety and effectiveness in treating serious or life-threatening illnesses and that provide meaningful therapeutic benefit over existing treatments may also receive accelerated approval by the FDA, meaning the agency may approve the product candidate based upon a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, or on a clinical endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on irreversible morbidity or mortality or other clinical benefit. As part of our alignment with FDA in December 2024 on the accelerated approval pathway for AMT-130, the agency agreed that cUHDRS may be used as an intermediate clinical endpoint and that reductions in NfL measured in CSF may serve as supportive evidence of therapeutic benefit in the application for accelerated approval.
There is no guarantee that we would be able to obtain accelerated approval as FDA may disagree with our interim endpoint or may find that such endpoint is not met following subsequent clinical data. These designations and accelerated approval pathways may not lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process and may not increase the likelihood that our product candidates will receive marketing approval. Even though we have aligned with the FDA on elements of the accelerated approval pathway for AMT-130, we may not ultimately be successful in obtaining marketing approval for AMT-130, we may be unsuccessful in meeting post-marketing compliance requirements, or fail to conduct required post-approval studies, or to confirm a clinical benefit during post-marketing studies, which could result in the FDA withdrawing our product from the market. In recent years, the accelerated approval pathway has come under significant FDA and public scrutiny and it is unclear how the incoming Trump Administration in the U.S. will address regulations related to accelerated approval pathways, if at all. Accordingly, it is uncertain whether the FDA may be more conservative in granting accelerated approval or, if granted, more apt to withdraw approval if clinical benefit is not confirmed. There is no guarantee that regulatory interactions with FDA or comparable foreign authorities will result in our ability to avail ourselves of any specialized approval pathways for our product candidates.
Our failure to obtain or maintain orphan product exclusivity for any of our product candidates for which we seek this status could limit our commercial opportunity, and if our competitors are able to obtain orphan product exclusivity before we do, we may not be able to obtain approval for our competing products for a significant period.
Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the U.S. and the European Union, may designate drugs for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. While certain of our product candidates, including AMT-130, AMT-191 and AMT-162 have received orphan drug designation, there is no guarantee that we will be able to receive such designations in the future. The FDA may grant orphan designation to multiple sponsors for the same compound or active molecule and for the same indication. If another sponsor receives FDA approval for such product before we do, we would be prevented from launching our product in the U.S. for the orphan indication for a period of at least seven years unless we can demonstrate clinical superiority.
44
Moreover, while orphan drug designation neither shortens the development or regulatory review time, nor gives the product candidate advantages in the regulatory review or approval process, generally, if a product with an orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first marketing approval for the relevant indication, the product is entitled to a period of market exclusivity, which precludes the FDA or the EMA from approving another marketing application for the same drug for the same indication for that period. The FDA and the EMA, however, may subsequently approve a similar drug or same drug, in the case of the U.S., for the same indication during the first product’s market exclusivity period if the FDA or the EMA concludes that the later drug is clinically superior in that it is shown to be safer or more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care. Orphan exclusivity in the U.S. also does not prevent the FDA from approving another product that is considered to be the same as our product candidates for a different indication or a different product for the same orphan indication. If another product that is the same as ours is approved for a different indication, it is possible that third-party payors will reimburse for products off-label even if not indicated for the orphan condition. Moreover, in the U.S. the exact scope of orphan drug exclusivity is currently uncertain and evolving due to a recent court decision.
Orphan drug exclusivity may be lost for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to if the FDA or the EMA determines that the request for designation was materially defective, or if the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient quantity of the drug to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition. The inability to obtain or failure to maintain adequate product exclusivity for our product candidates could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, results of operations and financial condition.
Our focus on developing gene therapies makes it difficult to determine the availability and utility of the orphan drug regime to our product candidates. Regulatory criteria with respect to orphan products are evolving, especially in gene therapy. By example, in the U.S., whether two gene therapies are considered to be the same for the purpose of determining clinical superiority was updated via a final guidance document specific to gene therapies, and depends on a number of factors, including the expressed transgene, the vector, and other product or product candidate features. Depending on the products, whether two products are ultimately considered to be the same may be determined by FDA on a case-by-case basis, making it difficult to make predictions regarding when the FDA might be able to make an approval of a product effective and whether periods of exclusivity will effectively block competitors seeking to market products that are the same or similar to ours for the same intended use. Accordingly, whether any of our gene therapies will be deemed to be the same as another product or product candidate is uncertain.
As appropriate, we intend to seek available periods of regulatory exclusivity for our product candidates. However, there is no guarantee that we will be granted these periods of regulatory exclusivity or that we will be able to maintain these periods of exclusivity.
The FDA grants product sponsors certain periods of regulatory exclusivity, during which the agency may not approve, and in certain instances, may not accept, certain marketing applications for competing drugs. For example, biologic product sponsors may be eligible for twelve years of exclusivity from the date of approval, seven years of exclusivity for drugs that are designated to be orphan drugs, and/or a six-month period of exclusivity added to any existing exclusivity period for the submission of FDA requested pediatric data. While we intend to apply for all periods of market exclusivity that we may be eligible for, there is no guarantee that we will be granted any such periods of market exclusivity. By example, regulatory authorities may determine that our product candidates are not eligible for periods of regulatory exclusivity for various reasons, including a determination by the FDA that a BLA approval does not constitute a first licensure of the product. Additionally, under certain circumstances, the FDA may revoke the period of market exclusivity. Thus, there is no guarantee that we will be able to maintain a period of market exclusivity, even if granted. In the case of orphan designation, other benefits, such as tax credits and exemption from user fees may be available. If we are not able to obtain or maintain orphan drug designation or any period of market exclusivity to which we may be entitled, we could be materially harmed, as we will potentially be subject to greater market competition and may lose the benefits associated with programs. It is also possible that periods of exclusivity will not adequately protect our product candidates from competition. For instance, even if we receive twelve years of exclusivity from the FDA, other applicants will still be able to submit and receive approvals for versions of our product candidates through a full BLA. It is also possible that periods of regulatory exclusivity may change. By example, the EU has proposed exclusivity changes, in the form of draft legislation, that would effectively shorten the periods of EU orphan market exclusivity and data exclusivity.
45
If we do not obtain or maintain periods of market exclusivity, we may face competition sooner than otherwise anticipated. For instance, in the U.S., this could mean that a competing biosimilar product may be able to apply to the FDA and obtain approval either as a biosimilar to one of our products or even as an interchangeable product. This may require that we undertake costly and time-consuming patent litigation, to the extent available, or defend actions brought by the biosimilar applicant for declaratory judgment. If a biosimilar product does enter the market, it is possible that it could be substituted for one of our product candidates, especially if it is available at a lower price.
It is also possible that, at the time we obtain approval of our product candidates, regulatory laws and policies around exclusivities may have changed. For instance, there have been efforts to decrease the U.S. period of exclusivity to a shorter timeframe. Future proposed budgets, international trade agreements and other arrangements or proposals may affect periods of exclusivity.
We and our commercial partner face uncertainty related to insurance coverage of, and pricing and reimbursement for, HEMGENIX® and other product candidates for which we may receive marketing approval.
We anticipate that the cost of treatment using our product candidates, if approved, will be significant. We expect that most patients and their families will not be capable of paying for our products themselves. There will be no commercially viable market for our product candidates without reimbursement from third party payers, such as government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. Even if there is a commercially viable market, if the level of third-party reimbursement is below our expectations, most patients may not be able to access treatment with our products and our potential revenues and gross margins will be adversely affected, and our business will be harmed.
Government authorities and other third-party payers, such as private health insurers and health maintenance organizations, decide for which medications they will pay and, subsequently, establish reimbursement levels. Reimbursement systems vary significantly by country and by region, and reimbursement approvals must be obtained on a country-by-country basis. Government authorities and third-party payers have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular medications and procedures and negotiating or requiring payment of manufacturer rebates. Increasingly, third party payers require drug companies to provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices, are exerting influence on decisions regarding the use of particular treatments and are limiting covered indications.
Moreover, payment methodologies may be subject to changes in healthcare legislation and regulatory initiatives. For example, the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services may develop new payment and delivery models, such as bundled payment models in the future. Currently, if a drug product is reimbursed by Medicare or Medicaid, pricing and rebate programs must comply with, as applicable, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 as well as the Medicaid rebate requirements of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (“OBRA”), the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992, Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, each as amended. In addition, recently there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their marketed products, which has resulted in several U.S. Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, reduce the cost of prescription drugs under government payor programs, and review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient assistance programs. Most recently, on August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”), was signed into law. Among other things, the IRA requires manufacturers of certain high-Medicare spend drugs to engage in price negotiations with Medicare (with the maximum fair prices for the first year of the negotiation program being initially applicable in 2026), with prices that can be negotiated subject to a cap; imposes rebates for certain drugs under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation (first due in 2023); and replaces the Part D coverage gap discount program with a new discounting program (beginning in 2025). We expect that additional U.S. federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit coverage and/or the amounts that the U.S. federal government will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for our product candidates or additional pricing pressures and could seriously harm our business.
46
Individual states in the U.S. have also increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. Legally mandated price controls on payment amounts by third-party payors or other restrictions could seriously harm our business. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug healthcare programs. This could reduce the ultimate demand for our product candidates or put pressure on our product pricing. Furthermore, there has been increased interest by third-party payors and governmental authorities in reference pricing systems and publication of discounts and list prices. Prescription drugs and biological products that are in violation of these requirements will be included on a public list. These reforms could reduce the ultimate demand for our product candidates or put pressure on our product pricing and could seriously harm our business.
In the EU, similar political, economic, and regulatory developments may affect our ability to profitably commercialize our product candidates, if approved. In addition to continuing pressure on prices and cost containment measures, legislative developments at the EU or member state level may result in significant additional requirements or obstacles that may increase our operating costs. The delivery of healthcare in the EU, including the establishment and operation of health services and the pricing and reimbursement of medicines, is almost exclusively a matter for national, rather than EU, law and policy. National governments and health service providers have different priorities and approaches to the delivery of health care and the pricing and reimbursement of products in that context. In general, however, the healthcare budgetary constraints in most EU member states have resulted in restrictions on the pricing and reimbursement of medicines by relevant health service providers. Coupled with ever-increasing EU and national regulatory burdens on those wishing to develop and market products, this could prevent or delay marketing approval of our product candidates, restrict or regulate post-approval activities and affect our ability to commercialize our product candidates, if approved. In markets outside of the U.S. and EU, reimbursement and healthcare payment systems vary significantly by country, and many countries have instituted price ceilings on specific products and therapies.
We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative or judicial action in the U.S., the EU, or any other jurisdiction. If we or any third parties we may engage are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we or such third parties are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, our product candidates may lose any regulatory approval that may have been obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.
The pricing review period and pricing negotiations for new medicines take considerable time and have uncertain results. Pricing review and negotiation usually begin only after the receipt of regulatory marketing approval, and some authorities require approval of the sale price of a product before it can be marketed. In some markets, particularly the countries of the European Union, prescription pharmaceutical pricing remains subject to continuing direct governmental control and to drug reimbursement programs even after initial approval is granted and price reductions may be imposed. Prices of medical products may also be subject to varying price control mechanisms or limitations as part of national health systems if products are considered not cost-effective or where a drug company’s profits are deemed excessive. In addition, pricing and reimbursement decisions in certain countries can lead to mandatory price reductions or additional reimbursement restrictions in other countries. Because of these restrictions, any product candidates for which we may obtain marketing approval may be subject to price regulations that delay or prohibit our or our partners’ commercial launch of the product in a particular jurisdiction. In addition, we or any collaborator may elect to reduce the price of our products to increase the likelihood of obtaining reimbursement approvals. If countries impose prices which are not sufficient to allow us or any collaborator to generate a profit, we or any collaborator may refuse to launch the product in such countries or withdraw the product from the market. If pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, or if the price decreases, our business could be harmed, possibly materially. If we fail to obtain and sustain an adequate level of coverage and reimbursement for our products by third party payers, our ability to market and sell our products could be adversely affected and our business could be harmed.
47
Due to the generally limited addressable market for our target orphan indications and the potential for our therapies to offer therapeutic benefit in a single administration, we face uncertainty related to our product candidates.
The relatively small market size for orphan indications and the potential for long-term therapeutic benefit from a single administration present challenges for pricing review and negotiation of our product candidates for which we may obtain marketing authorization. Most of our product candidates target rare diseases with relatively small patient populations. If we are unable to obtain adequate levels of reimbursement relative to these small markets, our ability to support our development and commercial infrastructure and to successfully market and sell our product candidates for which we may obtain marketing approval could be adversely affected.
We also anticipate that many or all our gene therapy product candidates may provide long-term, and potentially curative benefit, with a single administration. This is a different paradigm than that of many other pharmaceutical therapies, which often require an extended course of treatment or frequent administration. As a result, governments and other payers may be reluctant to provide the significant level of reimbursement that we seek at the time of administration of our gene therapies or may seek to tie reimbursement to clinical evidence of continuing therapeutic benefit over time. Additionally, there may be situations in which our product candidates will need to be administered more than once, which may further complicate the pricing and reimbursement for these treatments. In addition, considering the anticipated cost of these therapies, governments and other payers may be particularly restrictive in making coverage decisions. These factors could limit our commercial success and materially harm our business.
If any of our product candidates receive regulatory approval, we and/or our partners will be subject to extensive regulatory requirements. Failure to fulfill and comply with the applicable regulatory requirements could result in regulatory enforcement actions that would be detrimental to our business.
Following any regulatory approval, the FDA and the EMA may impose certain post-approval requirements related to a product. Specifically, any approved products will be subject to continuing and comprehensive regulation concerning the product’s design, testing, manufacture, safety, efficacy, recordkeeping, labeling, storage, approval, advertising, promotion, sale, and distribution. Regulatory authorities may also require post-marketing testing, known as Phase 4 testing, a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, and surveillance to monitor the effects of an approved product or place conditions on an approval that could restrict the distribution or use of the product. Failure to comply with any of these requirements could result in regulatory, administrative, or other enforcement action, which would be detrimental to our business.
For instance, the FDA and other government agencies closely regulate the post-approval marketing and promotion of approved products, including off-label promotion, industry-sponsored scientific and educational activities, and on the Internet and social media. Approved products may be marketed only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved labeling. Failure to comply with regulatory promotional standards could result in actions being brought against us by these agencies.
Moreover, if a company obtains FDA approval for a product via the accelerated approval pathway, the company would be required to conduct a post-marketing confirmatory trial to verify and describe the clinical benefit in support of full approval. FDA can, and frequently does, require that this confirmatory trial be commenced prior to FDA granting a product accelerated approval. If FDA requires that a confirmatory study be underway prior to BLA approval, this could delay any planned BLA submissions and FDA marketing approvals. Moreover, an unsuccessful post-marketing study or failure to complete such a study could result in the expedited withdrawal of the FDA’s marketing approval for a product using a statutorily defined streamlined process.
Changes to some of the conditions established in an approved application, including changes in labeling, indications, manufacturing processes or facilities, may require a submission to and approval by the FDA or the EMA, as applicable, before the change can be implemented. A New Drug Application (“NDA”)/BLA or MAA supplement for a new indication typically requires clinical data similar to that in the original application. The applicable regulatory authorities would review such supplement using similar procedures and actions as in reviewing NDAs/BLAs and MAAs.
48
Adverse event reporting and submission of periodic reports is required following marketing approval. Regulatory authorities may withdraw product approvals or request product recalls, as well as impose other enforcement actions, if a company fails to comply with regulatory standards, if it encounters problems following initial marketing, or if previously unrecognized problems are subsequently discovered.
In addition, the manufacture, testing, packaging, labeling, and distribution of products after approval will need to continue to conform to cGMPs. Drug and biological product manufacturers, including us, and certain of their subcontractors are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA or the EMA for compliance with cGMPs. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money, and effort in the areas of production and quality control to maintain compliance with cGMPs. In addition, prescription drug manufacturers in the U.S. must comply with applicable provisions of the Drug Supply Chain Security Act and provide and receive product tracing information, maintain appropriate licenses, ensure they only work with other properly licensed entities and have procedures in place to identify and properly handle suspect and illegitimate products. If we or any of our contractors are unable to comply with the requirements that are applicable to drug manufacturers, we or they may be subject to regulatory enforcement, or may need to conduct a recall or take other corrective actions, which could result in material harm to us or our products.
Where we partner with third parties for the development, approval, and marketing of a product, such third parties will be subject to the same regulatory obligations as we will. However, as we will not control the actions of the applicable third parties, we will be reliant on them to meet their contractual and regulatory obligations. Accordingly, actions taken by any of our partners could materially and adversely impact our business.
Risks Related to Commercialization
If we are unable to successfully commercialize our product candidates or experience significant delays in doing so, our business could be materially harmed.
Our ability to generate revenues from our product candidates will depend on the successful development and eventual commercialization of our product candidates, whether we choose to pursue further development or commercialization our product candidates alone or with a partner. If we are successful in obtaining marketing approval from applicable regulatory authorities for AMT-130 or any of our other product candidates, our ability to generate revenues from our product candidates will depend on our success in:
● | actual receipt and maintenance of marketing approvals from applicable regulatory authorities; |
● | launch of commercial sales of our products, if approved, whether alone or in collaboration with others; |
● | maintaining regulatory approvals, including manufacturing approvals for our third-party manufacturing sites; |
● | complying with any applicable post-approval commitments and requirements, and maintaining a continued acceptable overall safety profile; |
● | identifying and engaging effective distributors or resellers on acceptable terms in jurisdictions where we plan to utilize third parties for the marketing and sales of our product candidates; |
● | acceptance of our products, if approved, by patients, the medical community, and third-party payers; |
● | effectively competing with existing therapies and gene therapies based on safety and efficacy profiles; |
● | the strength of our marketing and distribution; |
● | the achievement optimal pricing based on durability of expression, safety, and efficacy; |
● | the ultimate content of the regulatory authority approved label, including the approved clinical indications, and any limitations or warnings; |
● | any distribution or use restrictions imposed by regulatory authorities; |
● | the interaction of our products with any other medicines that patients may be taking or the restriction on the use of our products with other medicines; |
● | the standard of care at the time of product approval; |
● | the relative convenience and ease of administration of our products; |
● | obtaining healthcare coverage and adequate reimbursement of our products; |
● | any price concessions, rebates, or discounts we may need to provide; |
● | obtaining adequate reimbursement for the total patient population and each subgroup to sustain a viable commercial business model in U.S. and EU markets; and |
● | obtaining and maintaining patent and trade secret protection and non-patent, exclusivities for our product candidates. |
49
Even if our product candidates are approved, they may be subject to limitations that make commercialization difficult, and we may experience these difficulties regardless of whether we choose to commercialize our product candidates alone or with a partner. There may be limitations on the indicated uses and populations for which the products may be marketed. They may also be subject to other conditions of approval, may contain significant safety warnings, including boxed warnings, contraindications, and precautions, may not be approved with label statements necessary or desirable for successful commercialization, or may contain requirements for costly post-market testing and surveillance, or other requirements, including the submission of a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (“REMS”) to monitor the safety or efficacy of the products. Failure to achieve or implement any of the above elements could result in significant delays or an inability to successfully commercialize our product candidates, which could materially harm our business.
Any approved gene therapy we seek to commercialize may fail to achieve the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients, third party payers and others in the medical community necessary for commercial success.
Doctors may be reluctant to accept gene therapy as a treatment option or, where available, choose to continue to rely on existing treatments. The degree of market acceptance of any of our product candidates that receive marketing approval in the future will depend on many factors, including:
● | the efficacy and potential advantages of our therapies compared with alternative treatments; |
● | our ability to convince payers of the long-term cost-effectiveness of our therapies and, consequently, the availability of third-party coverage and adequate reimbursement; |
● | the cost of treatment with gene therapies, including ours, in comparison to traditional chemical and small molecule treatments; |
● | the limitations on use and label requirements imposed by regulators; |
● | the convenience and ease of administration of our gene therapies compared with alternative treatments; |
● | the willingness of the target patient population to try new therapies, especially a gene therapy, and of physicians to administer these therapies; |
● | the strength of marketing and distribution support; |
● | the prevalence and severity of any side effects; |
● | limited access to site of service that can perform the product preparation and administer the infusion; and |
● | any restrictions by regulators on the use of our products. |
A failure to gain market acceptance for any of the above reasons, or any reasons at all, by a gene therapy for which we receive regulatory approval would likely hinder our ability to recapture our substantial investments in that and other gene therapies and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operation.
The affected populations for our gene therapies may be smaller than we or third parties currently project, which may affect the size of our addressable markets.
Our projections of the number of people who have the diseases we are seeking to treat, as well as the subset of people with these diseases who have the potential to benefit from treatment with our therapies, are estimates based on our knowledge and understanding of these diseases and may change. The total addressable market opportunities for these therapies will depend upon many factors, including the diagnosis and treatment criteria included in the final label, if approved for sale in specified indications, acceptance by the medical community, patient consent, patient access and product pricing and reimbursement, among other factors.
50
Prevalence estimates are frequently based on information and assumptions that are not exact and may not be appropriate, and the methodology is forward-looking and speculative. For example, the addressable markets for certain of our AAV-based gene therapies may be impacted by the prevalence of neutralizing antibodies to the capsids, which are an integral component of our gene therapy constructs. Patients that have pre-existing antibodies to a particular capsid might not be eligible for administration of a gene therapy that includes this particular capsid. Moreover, neutralizing antibodies may be developed by a patient following administration of the product, which may render the patient ineligible for subsequent dosing. The use of such data to support addressable market estimates involves risks and uncertainties and is subject to change based on various factors. Our estimates may prove to be incorrect and new studies and information may change the estimated incidence or prevalence of the diseases we seek to address. The number of patients with the diseases we are targeting may turn out to be lower than expected or may not be otherwise amenable to treatment with our products, reimbursement may not be sufficient to sustain a viable business for all sub-populations being studied, or new patients may become increasingly difficult to identify or access, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations and our business.
If the market opportunities for our product candidates are smaller than we believe they are, our product revenues may be adversely affected, and our business may suffer.
We focus our research and development on product candidates designed to treat severe genetic and orphan diseases. Our understanding of both the number of people who have these diseases, as well as the subset of people with these diseases who have the potential to benefit from treatment with our product candidates, are based on estimates. These estimates may prove to be incorrect and new studies may reduce the estimated incidence or prevalence of these diseases. The number of patients in the U.S., the EU and elsewhere may turn out to be lower than expected, may not be otherwise amenable to treatment with our products or patients may become increasingly difficult to identify and access, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Further, there are several factors that could contribute to making the actual number of patients who receive other potential products less than the potentially addressable market. These include the lack of widespread availability of, and limited reimbursement for, new therapies in many underdeveloped markets. Further, the severity of the progression of a disease up to the time of treatment, especially in certain degenerative conditions, could diminish the therapeutic benefit conferred by a gene therapy. Lastly, certain patients’ immune systems might prohibit the successful delivery of certain gene therapy products to the target tissue, thereby limiting the treatment outcomes.
Ethical, legal, and social issues associated with genetic testing may reduce demand for any gene therapy products for which we obtain marketing approval.
Prior to receiving certain gene therapies, patients may be required to undergo genetic testing. Genetic testing has raised concerns regarding the appropriate utilization and the confidentiality of information provided by genetic testing. Genetic tests for assessing a person’s likelihood of developing a chronic disease have focused public attention on the need to protect the privacy of patient’s underlying genetic information. For example, concerns have been expressed that insurance carriers and employers may use these tests to discriminate based on genetic information, resulting in barriers to the acceptance of genetic tests by consumers. This could lead to governmental authorities restricting genetic testing or calling for limits on or regulating the use of genetic testing, particularly for diseases for which there is no known cure. Any of these scenarios could decrease demand for any products for which we obtain marketing approval.
51
If we obtain approval to commercialize any of our product candidates outside of the U.S., a variety of risks associated with international operations could materially adversely affect our business.
We expect that we will be subject to additional risks in commercializing any of our product candidates outside the U.S., including:
● | different regulatory requirements for approval of drugs and biologics in foreign countries; |
● | reduced protection for intellectual property rights; |
● | unexpected changes in tariffs, trade barriers and regulatory requirements which may make it more difficult or expensive to export or import products and supplies to or from the U.S.; |
● | economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in particular foreign economies and markets; |
● | compliance with tax, employment, immigration, and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad; |
● | foreign currency fluctuations, which could result in increased operating expenses and reduced revenues, and other obligations incident to doing business in another country; |
● | workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the U.S.; |
● | production shortages resulting from any events affecting raw material supply or manufacturing capabilities abroad; and |
● | business interruptions resulting from geopolitical actions, including war and terrorism or natural disasters including earthquakes, typhoons, floods, and fires. |
Risks Related to Manufacturing and Our Dependence on Third Parties
The Lexington Transaction may not yield the benefits that we expect and may result in additional risks to our business, including those related to Genezen’s ability to manufacture HEMGENIX in accordance with regulatory requirements and to meet CSL Behring’s supply requirements for commercial product.
In connection with the closing of the Lexington Transaction in July 2024, we and Genezen entered into certain additional agreements, including a commercial supply agreement pursuant to which Genezen will manufacture and supply our requirements of HEMGENIX® pursuant to our manufacturing and supply obligations to CSL Behring, and development and other manufacturing services agreement pursuant to which Genezen will manufacture, supply and provide certain development services to support the requirements of our investigational gene therapy programs and for other discretionary services related to the manufacture of HEMGEMIX®, along with other customary agreements. As a component of our broader efforts to focus our business and reduce operating expenses, the Lexington Transaction is expected to reduce our cash burn as a result of a reduction in facility and personnel-related costs, among others.
The Lexington Transaction may not ultimately reduce our operating expenses as we expect. In addition, we may be exposed to additional costs and risks related to or as a result of the Lexington Transaction, including, without limitation additional expenses associated with outsourcing certain manufacturing and development services, as well as our contractual obligations and minimum financial commitments to Genezen under the CSA and the DMSA, supply-related risks related Genezen’s ability and capacity to satisfy our continued obligations to CSL Behring and the supply requirements of our other product candidates, including the CMC and supply-related requirements for our BLA submission for AMT-130, contractual default under our agreements with Genezen or with CSL Behring, and other third-party risks relative to our partnership with Genezen. The occurrence of any of the foregoing or any other risks as a result of or related to the Lexington Transaction could considerably harm our business and impact our financial condition and results of operations.
52
Gene therapies are complex, expensive and difficult to manufacture. Genezen or any third-party manufacturer that we engage could experience capacity, production or technology transfer challenges that could result in delays in our development or commercialization schedules or otherwise adversely affect our business.
Our proprietary manufacturing processes leveraging insect cells and baculoviruses to produce AAV-based gene therapies are highly complex and regularly subject to variation or production difficulties. Issues with any of our manufacturing processes, even minor deviations from our standard processes, could result in insufficient yield, product deficiencies or manufacturing or supply failures that could result in adverse patient reactions, lot failures, insufficient inventory, product recalls and product liability claims. Additionally, we and our third-party manufacturers, including Genezen, may not be able to scale up some or all our manufacturing processes as necessary and on our desired timelines to meet the demands of our clinical product pipeline and regulatory timelines, which may result in delays in regulatory approvals, inability to produce sufficient amounts of clinical or commercial product, or otherwise adversely affect our business.
Factors common to the manufacturing process associated with most biologics and drugs could also cause production interruptions for us or our third-party manufacturers, including, without limitation, raw materials shortages and other supply chain challenges, raw material failures, limited control over pricing of raw materials, growth media failures, equipment malfunctions, costs associated with servicing real property lease and other contractual obligations, facility contamination, labor problems, natural disasters, disruption in utility services, public health crises, terrorist activities, war or cases of force majeure and other events beyond our control. We or our third-party manufacturers also may encounter problems in hiring and retaining the experienced and specialized personnel needed to evaluate and supervise manufacturing and quality operations and, in the case of our contract manufacturers, operate manufacturing facilities, processes and testing, which could result in delays in our production or difficulties in maintaining compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. Genezen may experience the same personnel-related challenges resulting in the same delays and compliance issues.
Prior to the Lexington Transaction, we manufactured HEMGENIX® at the Lexington Facility, which is optimized to meet HEMGENIX® product specifications and the commercial manufacturing and supply obligations under our collaboration with CSL Behring. Following the Lexington Transaction, Genezen is responsible for the manufacturing and supply of HEMGENIX® at the Lexington Facility, though we remain contractually obligated to CSL Behring consistent with the terms of our development and commercial supply agreement with CSL Behring. While uniQure has priority and preferential status with Genezen, Genezen may not have sufficient capacity to support our other development programs or those of its other customers, which may negatively impact our business and ability to advance development goals unrelated to HEMGENIX® and our obligations to CSL Behring. The manufacturing of HEMGENIX® pursuant to our obligations under the CSL Behring Agreement is expensive and requires the dedication of significant resources, notwithstanding the Lexington Transaction and our subcontracting to Genezen. In September 2022, CSL Behring notified us of its intent to transfer manufacturing technology related to HEMGENIX® to a third-party contract manufacturer designated by CSL Behring. Until CSL Behring completes the transfer of manufacturing technology to this new manufacturer, and until such manufacturer is able to demonstrate that it is capable of supporting the commercial requirements of HEMGENIX® sufficient for regulatory approval, we will continue to incur significant costs associated with the manufacturing and supply of HEMGENIX® through our contractual relationship with Genezen. Should Genezen encounter a manufacturing issue or if Genezen is unable to provide a sufficient supply of HEMGENIX® consistent with agreed-upon forecasting mechanisms, we may be unable to fulfil our contractual commitments to CSL Behring and may, thus, face contractual liabilities.
Following the Lexington Transaction, Genezen may experience challenges in adapting the Lexington Facility to meet the manufacturing and supply needs for products other than HEMGENIX® as a result of capacity and resource constraints, or its inability to adapt to new manufacturing processes, among other challenges. Any problems or limitations with respect to our manufacturing processes or facilities, including the existing commercial supply and manufacturing obligations to CSL Behring, could make us a less attractive collaborator for academic research institutions and other parties, which could limit our access to additional attractive development programs or sources of capital, result in delays in our clinical development or marketing schedules and materially harm our business.
53
The manufacturing of our products and product candidates is subject to significant government regulations and approvals. We currently rely and expect to continue to rely on third parties to manufacture our product candidates, and these third parties may not perform satisfactorily or may fail to comply with these regulations or maintain these approvals.
The manufacturing of our products and product candidates is subject to significant government regulation. We currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties for the production of our preclinical study and planned clinical trial materials and, therefore, we can control only certain aspects of their activities. Following the Lexington Transaction, we rely on Genezen for the production of HEMGENIX® and will have preferential access to the Lexington Facility for the production of materials related to AMT-130 and AMT-191 programs under separately negotiated development and supply arrangements. The facilities used by Genezen and our other contract manufacturers are subject to FDA inspections, including after we submit a BLA. We are completely dependent on Genezen and our other contract manufacturers to execute on our manufacturing processes for HEMGENIX® and other product candidates and for compliance with cGMP requirements. If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA or other regulatory bodies, we will not be able to obtain and/or maintain regulatory approval for our products manufactured by third parties. In addition, we have no control over the ability of our contract manufacturers to maintain adequate quality control, quality assurance and qualified personnel. If the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority does not approve these facilities for the manufacture of our product candidates or if it withdraws any such approval in the future, we may need to find alternative third-party manufacturers, which may not be available and which would significantly impact our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our product candidates, if approved.
With the exception of AMT-260 and AMT-162 and prior to the Lexington Transaction, we produced our gene therapies at the Lexington Facility using our proprietary manufacturing processes. The Lexington Facility is and will continue to be subject to ongoing regulation and periodic inspection by the FDA, EU member state, and other regulatory bodies to ensure compliance with cGMP and other requirements. Any failure to follow and document our adherence to such cGMP regulations or other regulatory requirements may lead to significant delays in the availability of products for commercial sale or clinical study, may result in the termination of or a hold on a clinical study, or may delay or prevent filing or approval of marketing applications for our products.
Failure to comply with applicable regulations could also result in the FDA, EU member state, or other applicable authorities taking various actions, including:
● | taking enforcement actions or levying fines and other civil penalties; |
● | imposing consent decrees or injunctions; |
● | requiring us to suspend or put on hold one or more of our clinical trials, or conduct new or additional trials; |
● | suspending or withdrawing regulatory approvals; |
● | delaying or refusing to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications; |
● | requiring us to suspend manufacturing activities or product sales, imports or exports; |
● | requiring us to communicate with physicians and other customers about concerns related to actual or potential safety, efficacy, and other issues involving our products; |
● | mandating or recommending product recalls or seizing products; |
● | imposing operating restrictions; or |
● | seeking criminal prosecutions, among other outcomes. |
Poor control of production processes can also lead to the introduction of adventitious agents or other contaminants, or to inadvertent changes in the properties or stability of a product candidate that may not be detectable in final product testing and that could have an adverse effect on clinical studies, or patient safety or efficacy. Moreover, if the Lexington Facility or the manufacturing facilities of any third-party manufacturer we may engage is not able to meet regulatory requirements, we or they may need to implement costly and time-consuming remedial actions. Any of the foregoing could materially harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
54
Moreover, if we, Genezen or our other third-party manufacturers are not able to manufacture a sufficient amount of our product candidates for clinical studies or eventual commercialization, or if Genezen is unable to satisfy our manufacturing and supply obligations to CSL Behring, our development programs and commercial prospects will be harmed. If Genezen cannot produce an adequate amount of our drug substance and product in compliance with the applicable regulatory requirements, we may need to contract with another third party to do so, and there is no guarantee that such third-party manufacturers will be available to us and able to manufacture on favorable terms or at all. The addition of a new manufacturer may also require FDA, EMA, EU, and other regulatory authority approvals, which we may not be able to obtain.
Our use of viruses, chemicals and other potentially hazardous materials requires us and our contract manufacturers to comply with regulatory requirements and exposes us to significant potential liabilities.
Our development and manufacturing processes and those of our third-party contract manufacturers involve the use of viruses, chemicals, other potentially hazardous materials and produce waste products. Accordingly, we and our third-party manufacturers are subject to national, federal, state, and local laws and regulations in the U.S. and Europe governing the use, manufacture, distribution, storage, handling, treatment, and disposal of these materials. In addition to ensuring the safe handling of these materials, these laws and regulations impose increased safeguards and security measures for many of these agents, including controlling access and screening of entities and personnel who have access to them, and establishing a comprehensive national database of registered entities. In the event of an accident or failure to comply with environmental, occupational health and safety and export control laws and regulations, we or our third-party contract manufacturers could be held liable for damages that result, and any such liability could exceed our assets and resources, and could result in material harm to our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our business may be adversely affected if we or third-party manufacturers are unable to validate our manufacturing processes and methods or develop new processes and methods to meet our product supply needs and obligations.
The manufacture of our AAV gene therapies is complex and requires significant expertise. Even with the relevant experience and expertise, manufacturers of gene therapy products often encounter difficulties in production, particularly in scaling out and validating initial production and ensuring that the product meets required specifications. These problems include difficulties with production costs and yields, quality control, including stability and potency of the product, quality assurance testing, instances of operator error, shortages of qualified personnel, as well as compliance with strictly enforced federal, state, and foreign regulations. In the past and prior to the Lexington Transaction, we have manufactured certain batches of product candidates intended for nonclinical, clinical and process validation purposes that have not met all our pre-specified quality parameters. To meet our expected future production needs and our regulatory filing timelines for gene therapy product candidates, Genezen will need to complete the validation of our manufacturing processes and methods for each program, and we may need to develop and validate new or larger scale manufacturing processes and methods to meet our needs. If Genezen or any other third-party manufacturer we engage is unable to consistently manufacture our gene therapy product candidates or any approved products in accordance with our pre-specified quality parameters and applicable regulatory standards, it could adversely impact our ability to validate our manufacturing processes and methods, to meet our production needs, to timely file a BLA or other regulatory submissions, to develop our other proprietary programs, to conserve our cash, or to receive financial payments pursuant to our agreements with third parties.
We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties to conduct, supervise, and monitor our preclinical studies and clinical trials, and those third parties may not perform satisfactorily, including failing to meet deadlines in the conduct and completion of such trials or failing to comply with regulatory requirements.
We rely on third parties, study sites, and others to conduct, supervise, manufacture materials for and monitor our preclinical and clinical trials for our product candidates and do not currently plan to independently conduct clinical or preclinical trials of any other potential product candidates. We expect to continue to rely on third parties, such as CROs, clinical data management organizations, medical and scientific institutions, and clinical and preclinical investigators, to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials.
55
While we have agreements governing the activities of such third parties, we have limited influence and control over their actual performance and activities. For instance, our third-party service providers are not our employees, and except for remedies available to us under our agreements with such third parties we cannot control whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our ongoing clinical, non-clinical, and preclinical programs. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or conduct our preclinical studies or clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or our stated protocols, if they need to be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of the data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our protocols, regulatory requirements or for other reasons, our trials may be repeated, extended, delayed, or terminated, we may not be able to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining, marketing approvals for our product candidates, we may not be able to, or may be delayed in our efforts to, successfully commercialize our product candidates, or we or they may be subject to regulatory enforcement actions. As a result, our results of operations and the commercial prospects for our product candidates would be harmed, our costs could increase and our ability to generate revenues could be delayed. To the extent we are unable to successfully identify and manage the performance of third-party service providers in the future, our business may be materially and adversely affected. Our third-party service providers may also have relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors, for whom they may also be conducting trials or other therapeutic development activities that could harm our competitive position.
Our reliance on these third parties for development activities reduces our control over these activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our studies is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal, regulatory, and scientific standards, and our reliance on third parties does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. For example, we will remain responsible for ensuring that each of our trials is conducted in accordance with the general investigational plan and protocols for the trial. We must also ensure that our preclinical trials are conducted in accordance with GLPs, as appropriate. Moreover, the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities require us to comply with GCPs for conducting, recording, and reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity, and confidentiality of trial participants are protected. Regulatory authorities enforce these requirements through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, clinical and preclinical investigators, and trial sites. If we or any of our third-party service providers fail to comply with applicable GCPs or other regulatory requirements, we or they may be subject to enforcement or other legal actions, the data generated in our trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional studies. In addition, we will be required to report on certain financial interests of our third-party investigators if these relationships exceed certain financial thresholds or meet other criteria. The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may question the integrity of the data from those clinical trials conducted by investigators who may have conflicts of interest.
We cannot assure that, upon inspection by a given regulatory authority, such regulatory authority will determine that any of our trials complies with the applicable regulatory requirements. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with product candidates that were produced under GMP conditions. Failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process. We also are required to register certain clinical trials and post the results of certain completed clinical trials on a government-sponsored database, ClinicalTrials.gov, within specified timeframes. Failure to do so can result in enforcement actions and adverse publicity.
Agreements with third parties conducting or otherwise assisting with our clinical or preclinical studies might terminate for a variety of reasons, including a failure to perform by the third parties. If any of our relationships with these third parties terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative providers or to do so on commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding additional third parties involves additional costs and requires management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new third party commences work. As a result, if we need to enter into alternative arrangements, it could delay our product development activities and adversely affect our business. Though we carefully manage our relationships with our third parties, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and prospects, and results of operations.
We also rely on other third parties to store and distribute our products for the clinical and preclinical trials that we conduct. Any performance failure on the part of our distributors could delay the development, marketing approval, or commercialization of our product candidates, producing additional losses and depriving us of potential product revenue.
56
We rely on third parties for important aspects of our development programs. If these parties do not perform successfully or if we are unable to enter into or maintain key collaborations or other contractual arrangements, our business could be adversely affected.
We have in the past entered into, and expect in the future to enter into, collaborations with other companies and academic research institutions with respect to important elements of our business development strategy or existing development programs. Any collaboration we enter into may pose risks, including the following:
● | collaborators have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to these collaborations; |
● | we may have limited or no control over the design or conduct of clinical trials sponsored by collaborators; |
● | we may be hampered from entering into collaboration arrangements if we are unable to obtain consent from our licensors to enter into sublicensing arrangements of technology we have in-licensed; |
● | if any collaborator does not conduct the clinical trials they sponsor in accordance with regulatory requirements or stated protocols, we will not be able to rely on the data produced in such trials in our further development efforts; |
● | collaborators may not perform their obligations as expected; |
● | collaborators may also have relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors; |
● | collaborators may not pursue development and commercialization of any product candidates or may elect not to continue or renew development or commercialization programs based on clinical trial results, changes in the collaborators’ strategic focus or available funding, or external factors, such as an acquisition, that divert resources or create competing priorities; |
● | collaborators may delay clinical trials, provide insufficient funding for a clinical trial program, stop a clinical trial, or abandon a product candidate, repeat or conduct new clinical trials or require a new formulation of a product candidate for clinical testing; |
● | collaborators could develop, independently or with third parties, products that compete directly or indirectly with our products or product candidates, if, for instance, the collaborators believe that competitive products are more likely to be successfully developed or can be commercialized under terms that are more economically attractive than ours; |
● | our collaboration arrangements may impose restrictions on our ability to undertake other development efforts that may appear to be attractive to us; |
● | product candidates discovered in collaboration with us may be viewed by our collaborators as competitive with their own product candidates or products, which may cause collaborators to cease to devote resources to the commercialization of our product candidates; |
● | a collaborator with marketing and distribution rights that achieves regulatory approval may not commit sufficient resources to the marketing and distribution of such product or products; |
● | disagreements with collaborators, including over proprietary rights, contract interpretation or the preferred course of development, could cause delays or termination of the research, development or commercialization of product candidates, lead to additional responsibilities for us, delay or impede reimbursement of certain expenses or result in litigation or arbitration, any of which would be time-consuming and expensive; |
● | collaborators may not properly maintain or defend our intellectual property rights or may use our proprietary information in such a way as to invite litigation that could jeopardize or invalidate our rights or expose us to potential litigation; |
● | collaborators may infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties, which may expose us to litigation and potential liability; and |
● | collaborations may in some cases be terminated for the convenience of the collaborator and, if terminated, we could be required to expend additional funds to pursue further development or commercialization of the applicable product or product candidates. |
If any collaboration does not result in the successful research, development and commercialization of products or if a collaborator were to terminate an agreement with us, we may not receive future research funding or milestone or royalty payments under that collaboration, and we may lose access to important technologies and capabilities from the collaboration. All the risks relating to product development, regulatory approval and commercialization described herein also apply to the activities of any development collaborators.
57
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
We rely on licenses of intellectual property from third parties, and such licenses may not provide adequate rights, may be open to multiple interpretations or may not be available in the future on commercially reasonable terms or at all, and our licensors may be unable to obtain and maintain patent protection for the technology or products that we license from them.
We currently are heavily reliant upon licenses of proprietary technology from third parties that are important or necessary to the development of our technology and products, including technology related to our manufacturing process, our vector platform, our gene cassettes, and the therapeutic genes of interest we are using. These and other licenses may not provide adequate rights to use such technology in all relevant fields of use. Licenses to additional third-party technology that may be required for our development programs may not be available in the future or may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
In some circumstances, we may not have the right, or have otherwise given up the right, to control the preparation, filing and prosecution of patent applications, or to maintain the patents, covering technology that we own or license from third parties. In addition, some of our agreements with our licensors require us to obtain consent from the licensor before we can enforce patent rights, and our licensor may withhold such consent or may not provide it on a timely basis. Therefore, we cannot be certain that these patents and applications will be prosecuted and enforced in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business which may materially impact any revenue that may be due to us in connection with such patents. In addition, if third parties who license patents to us fail to maintain such patents, or lose rights to those patents, the rights we have licensed may be reduced or eliminated.
Our intellectual property licenses with third parties may be subject to disagreements over contract interpretation, which could narrow the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual property or technology or increase our financial or other obligations to our licensors. The agreements under which we license intellectual property or technology from third parties are complex, and certain provisions in such agreements may be susceptible to multiple interpretations. The resolution of any contract interpretation disagreement that may arise could narrow what we believe to be the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual property or technology or increase what we believe to be our financial or other obligations under the relevant agreement, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
If we fail to comply with our obligations in our intellectual property licenses with third parties, we could lose rights that are important to our business.
Our licensing arrangements with third parties may impose diligence, development and commercialization timelines, milestone payment, royalty, insurance, and other obligations on us. If we fail to comply with these obligations, our counterparties may have the right to terminate these agreements either in part or in whole, in which case we might not be able to develop, manufacture or market any product that is covered by these agreements or may face other penalties under the agreements. Such an occurrence could materially adversely affect the value of the product candidate being developed under any such agreement or may otherwise result in reputational damage to our business. Termination of these agreements or reduction or elimination of our rights under these agreements may result in our having to negotiate new or amended agreements with less favorable terms or cause us to lose our rights under these agreements, including our rights to important intellectual property or technology.
58
If we are unable to obtain and maintain patent protection for our technology and products, or if the scope of the patent protection is not sufficiently broad, our ability to successfully commercialize our products may be impaired.
We rely, in part, upon a combination of different forms of intellectual property, including in-licensed and fully or co-owned patents and patent applications to protect our intellectual property. Our success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain this protection in the U.S., the European Union, and other countries or regions, in part by filing patent applications related to our novel technologies and product candidates. Our patents may not provide us with any meaningful commercial protection, may not prevent competitors from competing with us or otherwise provide us with any competitive advantage. At least some of the patents we own are or may become subject to patent opposition or similar proceedings. Additionally, the patent prosecution process is expensive, time-consuming, and uncertain, and in certain instances we have chosen, and in the future, we may choose, not to file and prosecute all desirable patent applications. For example, our defense of certain patent cases in the Netherlands, the EU and the U.S. pertaining to licensed rights of etranacogene dezaparvovec was assumed by CSL Behring in October 2023. These oppositions and future patent oppositions may result in loss of scope of some claims or the entire patent and, with respect to our rights under the CSL Agreement, could affect CSL Behring’s successful commercialization of HEMGENIX® and, in turn, could negatively impact our financial position. Additionally, our competitors may be able to circumvent our owned or licensed patents by developing similar or alternative technologies or products in a non-infringing manner.
Successful challenges to our patents may result in loss of exclusivity or freedom to operate or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated, or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, which could limit our ability or the ability of our licensees to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and products.
It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development output before it is too late to obtain patent protection. Additionally, given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. As a result, our owned and licensed patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours.
The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain, involves complex legal and factual questions and has in recent years been the subject of much litigation. In addition, the laws of foreign jurisdictions may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S. For example, EU patent law with respect to the patentability of methods of treatment of the human body is more limited than U.S. law. Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the U.S. and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after their priority date, or in some cases at all. Therefore, we cannot know with certainty whether we were the first to make the inventions or that we were the first to file for patent protection of the inventions claimed in our owned or licensed patents or pending patent applications. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability, and commercial value of our patent rights are highly uncertain. Our pending and future patent applications may not result in patents being issued that protect our technology or products, in whole or in part, or which effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and products. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the European Union, the U.S. or other jurisdictions may diminish the value of our patents or narrow the scope of our patent protection. Our inability to obtain and maintain appropriate patent protection for any one of our products could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or other intellectual property, or third parties may assert their intellectual property rights against us, which could be expensive, time consuming and unsuccessful.
Competitors may infringe on our owned or licensed patents or other intellectual property. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time consuming. An adverse result in any litigation proceeding could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated, maintained in a more narrowly amended form or interpreted narrowly.
59
Even if resolved in our favor, litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims may cause us to incur significant expenses, increase our operating losses, reduce available resources, and could distract our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments, which could have an adverse effect on the price of our ordinary shares.
Third parties may initiate legal proceedings alleging that we are infringing their intellectual property rights, the outcome of which would be uncertain and could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business. If we are found to otherwise infringe a third party’s intellectual property rights, we could be required to obtain a license from such third party to continue developing and marketing our products and technology. We may not be able to obtain the required license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we could obtain a license, it could be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us. We could be forced, including by court order, to cease commercializing the infringing technology or product or otherwise to cease using the relevant intellectual property. In addition, we could be found liable for monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees if we are found to have willfully infringed a patent. A finding of infringement could prevent us from commercializing our product candidates or force us to cease or materially modify some of our business operations, which could materially harm our business. Claims that we have misappropriated the confidential information or trade secrets of third parties could have a similar negative impact on our business.
In addition, legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims, with or without merit, are unpredictable and generally expensive and time-consuming and are likely to divert significant resources from our core business, including distracting our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation.
For example, we are aware of patents or patent applications owned by third parties that relate to some aspects of our programs that are still in development. In some cases, because we have not determined the final methods of manufacture, the method of administration or the therapeutic compositions for these programs, we cannot determine whether rights under such third-party positions will be needed. In addition, in some cases, we believe that the claims of these patents are invalid or not infringed or will expire before commercialization. However, if such patents are needed and found to be valid and infringed, we could be required to obtain licenses, which might not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or to cease or delay commercializing certain product candidates, or to change our programs to avoid infringement.
If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary information and know-how, the value of our technology and products could be adversely affected.
In addition to seeking patent protection, we also rely on other proprietary rights, including protection of trade secrets, know-how and confidential and proprietary information. To maintain the confidentiality of our trade secrets and proprietary information, we enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, collaborators and other third parties who have access to our trade secrets. Our agreements with employees also provide that any inventions conceived by the individual while rendering services to us will be our exclusive property. However, we may not obtain these agreements in all circumstances, and individuals with whom we have these agreements may not comply with their terms. The assignment of intellectual property rights may not be self-executing, or the assignment agreements may be breached, and we may be forced to bring claims against third parties, or defend claims that they may bring against us, to determine the ownership of what we regard as our intellectual property. In addition, in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of our trade secrets or proprietary information, these agreements, even if obtained, may not provide meaningful protection, particularly for our trade secrets or other confidential information. To the extent that our employees, consultants, or contractors use technology or know-how owned by third parties in their work for us, disputes may arise between us and those third parties as to the rights in related inventions.
60
Adequate remedies may not exist in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information including a breach of our confidentiality agreements. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive, and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts in and outside of the U.S. are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor or other third party, we would have no right to prevent them from using that technology or information to compete with us. The disclosure of our trade secrets or the independent development of our trade secrets by a competitor or other third party would impair our competitive position and may materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, share price and prospects.
Our reliance on third parties may require us to share our trade secrets, which could increase the possibility that a competitor will discover them or that our trade secrets will be misappropriated or disclosed.
Because we collaborate from time to time with various organizations and academic research institutions on the advancement of our gene therapy platform, we must, at times, share trade secrets with them. We seek to protect our proprietary technology in part by entering into confidentiality agreements and, if applicable, materials transfer agreements, collaborative research agreements, consulting agreements or other similar agreements with our collaborators, advisors, and consultants prior to beginning research or disclosing confidential or proprietary information. These agreements typically limit the rights of the third parties to use or disclose our confidential information, such as trade secrets. Despite the contractual protections, the need to share trade secrets and other confidential information increases the risk that such trade secrets become known by our competitors, are inadvertently incorporated into the technology of others, or are disclosed or used in violation of these agreements. Given that our proprietary position is based, in part, on our know-how and trade secrets, a competitor’s discovery of our trade secrets or other unauthorized use or disclosure would impair our competitive position and may have a material adverse effect on our business.
In addition, these agreements typically restrict the ability of our collaborators, advisors, and consultants to publish data potentially relating to our trade secrets. Our academic collaborators typically have rights to publish data, if we are notified in advance and may delay publication for a specified time to secure our intellectual property rights arising from the collaboration. In other cases, publication rights are controlled exclusively by us, although in some cases we may share these rights with other parties. We also conduct joint research and development programs that may require us to share trade secrets under the terms of our research and development partnerships or similar agreements. Some courts inside and outside the U.S. are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we would have no right to prevent them, or those with whom they communicate, from using that technology or information to compete with us.
Intellectual property rights do not necessarily address all potential threats to our competitive advantage.
The degree of future protection afforded by our intellectual property rights is uncertain because intellectual property rights have limitations and may not adequately protect our business or permit us to maintain a competitive advantage. For example:
● | others may be able to make gene therapy products that are similar to our product candidates or utilize similar gene therapy technology but that are not covered by the claims of the patents that we own or have licensed; |
● | we or our licensors or future collaborators might not have been the first to make the inventions covered issued patents or pending patent applications that we own or have licensed; |
● | we or our licensors or future collaborators might not have been the first to file patent applications covering certain of our inventions; |
● | others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies without infringing our intellectual property rights; |
● | it is possible that our pending patent applications will not lead to issued patents; |
● | issued patents that we own or have licensed may be held invalid or unenforceable, as a result of legal challenges by our competitors; |
● | our competitors might conduct activities in countries where we do not have patent rights and then use the information learned from such activities to develop competitive products for sale in our major commercial markets; |
● | we may not develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable; and |
● | the patents of others may have an adverse effect on our business. |
The occurrence of any of these events could seriously harm our business.
61
Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital
We had net losses in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, have incurred significant losses in previous years and expect to incur losses in the future, and may never achieve or maintain profitability.
We had a net loss of $43.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2025, and a net loss of $239.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2024. Other than a gain in the year ended December 31, 2021, which was primarily attributable to one-time license revenue from CSL Behring, we have incurred significant losses throughout our operating history. As of March 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $1,173.6 million. We have financed our operations to date primarily through the sale of equity securities and convertible debt, venture loans, upfront payments from our collaboration partners and, to a lesser extent, subsidies and grants from governmental agencies and fees for services. We expect to finance our operations in 2025 primarily from our existing cash resources. We have devoted substantially all our financial resources and efforts to date to research and development of our products and product candidates, including the conduct of preclinical studies and clinical trials and related manufacturing requirements. Even if we succeed in receiving marketing approval for and commercialize AMT-130 or other of our product candidates, we will continue to incur substantial research and development and other expenditures to develop and market additional potential products for the foreseeable future, and our net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. We anticipate that we will continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future as we:
● | incur costs associated with late-stage development of AMT-130 as well as the preparation of commercialization of AMT-130; |
● | continue to fund the clinical development of our other product candidates; |
● | incur the costs associated with the manufacturing of preclinical, clinical and commercial supplies of our product candidates through our partnership with Genezen and other third-party manufacturers; |
● | seek regulatory approval for AMT-130 and for any other product candidates; |
● | hire and retain personnel to support our business; |
● | enhance our operational, financial and management information systems and personnel; |
● | maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio; and |
● | incur legal, accounting and other expenses operating as a public company. |
We may never generate revenues that are sufficient to achieve or sustain profitability. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. We may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown factors that may adversely affect our business or otherwise increase the size of our future net losses. Our failure to generate value for our shareholders could impair our ability to raise capital, maintain our research and development efforts, diversify our product offerings, or even continue our operations.
We will need to raise additional funding in order to advance the development of our product candidates and support the commercial launch of AMT-130, which may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain capital when needed may force us to delay, limit or terminate our product development efforts or other operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We expect to incur significant expenses in connection with our ongoing activities and we will need to obtain substantial additional funding to support the development of our product pipeline and continuing operations. In January 2025, we entered into an underwriting agreement in connection with the issuance and sale of 4,411,764 or our ordinary shares at a public offering price of $17.00 per share, less underwriting discounts and commissions, pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 and accompanying prospectus (Registration No. 333-284168), which became effective upon filing on January 7, 2025, and a prospectus supplement thereunder. We received net proceeds of approximately $70.1 million from the January 2025 equity offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses payable by us. We received an additional $10.6 million in net proceeds in February 2025 from the underwriters’ exercise of their option to purchase additional ordinary shares at the public offering price. Based on our current operating plan, research and development plans and our timing expectations related to the progress of our programs, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and investment securities will be sufficient to fund our operations through the second half of 2027. We have based our current estimates of our financing requirements on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our capital resources sooner than we expect.
62
Adequate capital may not be available to us when needed or may not be available on acceptable terms. Our ability to obtain additional debt financing may be limited by covenants we have made under our 2024 Amended Facility with Hercules and our pledge to Hercules of substantially all our assets as collateral. Our ability to obtain additional equity financing may be limited by our shareholders’ willingness to approve the issuance of additional share capital. If we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, our shareholders’ ownership interest could be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of holders of our ordinary shares.
If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances, marketing, distribution, or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to issue additional equity, relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, products, or product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms or successfully pursue strategic partnerships where necessary, we could be forced to delay, reduce, or further eliminate our research and development programs or any future commercialization efforts, which would have a negative impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our business development and strategic initiatives, including divestitures such as the Lexington Transaction, acquisitions, partnerships, collaborations or other transactions, may not achieve their intended benefits or goals and may result in additional risks to our business.
We have historically pursued various strategic initiatives, transactions and business arrangements, including the July 2024 Lexington Transaction and the July 2021 acquisition of uniQure France and its lead program (AMT-260). We may, from time to time, enter into strategic transactions consistent with our business development and financial objectives. Implementing these and other strategic initiatives has included, and may in the future include, divestitures, acquisitions, asset purchases, partnerships, collaborations, joint ventures and other investments. Certain of these transactions and arrangements have been and may in the future be material to us both from a strategic and financial perspective. These initiatives, whether successful or not, have been, and may continue to be, complex, time-consuming and expensive, may divert management’s attention, and could expose us to operational challenges and potential inefficiencies. We may miscalculate the risks associated with our strategic initiatives at the time they are made or may not have the resources or ability to access all the relevant information to evaluate them properly, including with regard to the research and development-related risks, manufacturing and compliance issues, or the outcome of ongoing legal and other proceedings. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve all of our intended goals with respect to such strategies within the anticipated timeframes, if at all, or fully realize the expected benefits of any such transactions or arrangements.
Divestitures (including the Lexington Transaction), product rationalizations or asset sales could result in asset impairments, or reductions to the size or scope of our business, our market share in particular markets or our opportunities and ability to compete with respect to certain markets, therapeutic areas or products. We may not be successful in separating divested businesses or assets, which could negatively impact our ongoing and future operations. For example, the Lexington Transaction may result in continued financial and operational exposure related to the divested assets or businesses, through guarantees or other financial arrangements, indemnification obligations, continued manufacturing and supply and transition services obligations to the divested businesses, or potential litigation. In addition, we may also not be able to realize the intended or anticipated benefits from such transactions, such as realizing the anticipated cost savings, maintaining employee morale and retaining key management and other employees to operate our retained business, or may be unable to realize the intended or expected goals, outlooks, synergies or operating efficiencies with respect to such transactions.
The overall execution of our strategic initiatives may result in material unanticipated problems, expenses, liabilities, competitive responses, operational inefficiencies, adverse tax consequences, impairment or restructuring charges, loss of important third-party relationships, difficulty attracting and retaining qualified employees, and diversion of management’s and/or employee’s attention, among other potential adverse consequences. In addition, we may have to terminate a strategic alliance, agreement or arrangement, or our partners may be unable to fulfill their collaboration. Any of the risks described above could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, ability to pay dividends and/or share price.
63
Actions that we have taken or may take in the future to restructure our business in alignment with our strategic priorities may not be as effective as anticipated, may not result in cost savings to us and could disrupt our business.
In October 2023, we commenced a restructuring of our business to reprioritize our portfolio of development candidates, conserve financial resources and better align our workforce with current business needs. In June 2024, we announced the sale of the Lexington Facility and related manufacturing assets in conjunction with our broader efforts to reduce operating expenses and cash burn. In addition, in August 2024, we announced the outcome of our strategic review intended to conserve capital, streamline operations and ensure sufficient cash resources to advance multiple clinical-stage programs through potentially meaningful milestones. The 2024 restructuring, inclusive of the sale of our Lexington facility and associated employee transitions to Genezen, involved the elimination of approximately 65% of our global workforce, or approximately 300 roles across the company. We may encounter challenges in the execution of these and any future restructuring efforts, and these challenges could impact our financial results.
Although we believe that these actions will continue to streamline operations and reduce costs over the long term, we cannot guarantee that these restructuring efforts will achieve or sustain the targeted benefits, or that the benefits, even if achieved, will be adequate to meet our long-term expectations and the needs of our business. As a result of these restructuring efforts, we have and expect to continue to incur additional costs in the near term, including cash expenditures for employee transitions, notice periods and severance payments, costs associated with employee benefit programs and related restructuring facilitation and transaction costs. Additional risks associated with the continuing impact of these restructuring efforts include employee attrition beyond our intended reduction in force and adverse effects on employee morale (which may be exacerbated by actual or perceived declining value of equity awards), diversion of management attention, adverse effects to our reputation as an employer (which could make it more difficult for us to hire and retain new employees in the future), potential understaffing and potential failure or delays to meet regulatory or development targets due to the loss of qualified employees or other operational challenges. If we do not realize the expected benefits of our restructuring efforts on a timely basis or at all, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Our existing and any future indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.
As of March 31, 2025, we had $50.0 million of outstanding principal of borrowings under the 2024 Amended Facility. In July 2024, in connection with the closing of the Lexington Transaction, we repaid $50.0 million of the principal outstanding. We are required to repay the outstanding principal balance of $50.0 million upon the maturity date of the 2024 Amended Facility in January 2027. We may not be able to finance our operations from our existing cash, cash equivalents, and cash resources consistent with our expectations if we are not able to refinance the 2024 Amended Facility prior to the January 2027 maturity date. We could in the future incur additional debt obligations beyond our borrowings from Hercules. Our existing loan obligations with Hercules, together with other similar obligations that we may incur in the future, could have significant adverse consequences, including:
● | requiring us to dedicate a portion of our cash resources to the payment of interest and principal, reducing money available to fund working capital, capital expenditures, research and development and other general corporate purposes; |
● | increasing our vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry and market conditions; |
● | subjecting us to restrictive covenants that may reduce our ability to take certain corporate actions or obtain further debt or equity financing; |
● | limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we compete; and |
● | placing us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt or better debt servicing options. |
We may not have sufficient funds and may be unable to arrange for additional financing to pay the amounts due under our existing loan obligations. Failure to make payments or comply with other covenants under 2024 Amended Facility could result in an event of default and acceleration of amounts due. Under the 2024 Amended Facility, the occurrence of an event that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, assets, or condition is an event of default. If an event of default occurs and the lender accelerates the amounts due, we may not be able to make accelerated payments, and the lender could seek to enforce security interests in the collateral securing such indebtedness, which includes substantially all our assets.
64
Our 2024 Amended Facility bears a variable interest rate with a fixed floor. The U.S. Federal Reserve has raised, and may in the future further raise, interest rates. An increase in interest rates by the Federal Reserve has and could in the future cause the prime rate to increase, which has and could in the future increase our debt service obligations. Significant increases in such obligations could have a negative impact on our financial position or operating results, including cash available for servicing our indebtedness, or result in increased borrowing costs in the future.
Risks Related to Other Legal Compliance Matters
Our relationships with employees, customers and third parties are subject to applicable laws and regulations, the non-compliance of any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Healthcare providers, physicians, other practitioners, and third-party payers will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any products for which we obtain marketing approval. Our future arrangements with third party payers and customers may expose us to broadly applicable anti-bribery laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, as well as fraud and abuse and other U.S. and international healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we would be able to market, sell and distribute any products for which we obtain marketing approval.
Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable laws and regulations could involve substantial costs. If our operations, or the activities of our collaborators, distributors or other third-party agents are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal, and administrative penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, exclusion from participation in government funded healthcare programs and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations.
Additionally, we are subject to various labor and employment laws and regulations. These laws and regulations relate to matters such as employment discrimination, wage and hour laws, requirements to provide meal and rest periods or other benefits, family leave mandates, employee and independent contractor classification rules, requirements regarding working conditions and accommodations to certain employees, citizenship or work authorization and related requirements, insurance and workers’ compensation rules, healthcare laws, scheduling notification requirements and anti-discrimination and anti-harassment laws. Complying with these laws and regulations, including ongoing changes thereto, subjects us to substantial expense and non-compliance could expose us to significant liabilities. In particular, have in the past been subject to allegations of Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower retaliation and employment discrimination and retaliation, and we may in the future be subject to additional claims of non-compliance with similar or other laws and regulations.
Additionally, we are reliant on our employees, contractors, consultants, vendors, and other parties with whom we have relationships to behave ethically and within the requirements of the law. The failure of any employee or other such third parties to act within the bounds of the applicable laws, regulations, agreements, codes and other requirements, or any misconduct or illegal actions or omissions by such persons, could materially damage our business. The costs associated with an alleged or actual violation of any of the foregoing could be substantial and could cause irreparable harm to our reputation or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
65
We are subject to laws governing data protection in the different jurisdictions in which we operate. The implementation of such data protection regimes is complex, and should we fail to fully comply, we may be subject to penalties that may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Many national, international, and state laws govern the privacy and security of health information and other personal and private information. They often differ from each other in significant ways. For instance, the EU has adopted a comprehensive data protection law called the EU General Data Protection Regulation that took effect in May 2018. The UK has, following its exit from the EU, substantially adopted the EU General Data Protection Regulation into its domestic law through the UK General Data Protection Regulation (collectively with the EU General Data Protection Regulation, and related EU and UK e-Privacy laws, the “GDPR”). The GDPR, together with the national legislation of the UK (including the Data Protection Act 2018) and EU member states governing the processing of personal data, impose strict obligations and restrictions on the ability to collect, use, analyze and transfer personal information, including health data from clinical trials and adverse event reporting.
GDPR obligations applicable to us may include, in many circumstances, obtaining the (opt-in) consent of the individuals to whom the personal data relates; providing GDPR-prescribed data processing notices to individuals; complying with restrictions regarding the transfer of personal data out of the EU or the UK (as applicable) (including to the US); implementing and maintaining data protection policies and procedures; restrictions regarding the use of certain innovative technologies; providing data security breach notifications to supervisory authorities and affected individuals under tight timescales; and implementing security and confidentiality measures. Supervisory authorities in the different EU member states and the UK may interpret the GDPR and national laws differently and impose additional requirements. Guidance on implementation and compliance practices are often updated or otherwise revised. All of this adds to the complexity of processing personal information and remaining compliant with the GDPR.
The GDPR allows EU and UK supervisory authorities to impose penalties for non-compliance of up to the greater of EUR 20.0 million and 4% of annual worldwide gross revenue of the corporate group in question. (There are similar caps in GBP under the UK GDPR.). Supervisory authorities in the EU and UK may potentially levy such fines directly upon the non-compliant entity and/or upon the parent company of the non-compliant entity. Supervisory authorities also possess other wide-ranging powers, including conducting unannounced inspections of our facilities and system (so-called “dawn raids”), and issuing “stop processing” orders to us. Separate from regulatory enforcement actions, individuals may bring private actions (including potentially group or representative actions) against us. There is no statutory cap in the GDPR on the amount of compensation or the damages which individuals may recover.
Overall, the significant costs of GDPR compliance, risk of regulatory enforcement actions and private litigation under, and other burdens imposed by the GDPR as well as under other regulatory schemes throughout the world related to privacy and security of health information and other personal and private data could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Product liability lawsuits could cause us to incur substantial liabilities and to limit commercialization of our therapies.
We face an inherent risk of product liability related to the testing of our product candidates in human clinical trials and in connection with sales of approved products. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against claims that our product candidates or products or the procedures used to administer them to patients caused injuries, we will incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:
● | decreased demand for any product candidates or products that we develop or sell; |
● | injury to our reputation and significant negative media attention; |
● | negative publicity or public opinion surrounding gene therapy; |
● | withdrawal of clinical trial participants or sites, or discontinuation of development programs; |
● | significant costs to defend the related litigation; |
● | substantial monetary awards to trial participants or patients; |
● | loss of revenue; |
● | initiation of investigations, and enforcement actions by regulators; |
● | product recalls, withdrawals, revocation of approvals, or labeling, marketing, or promotional restrictions; |
● | diversion of resources of our management from pursuing our business strategy; and |
● | the inability to further develop or commercialize any products that we develop. |
66
Depending upon the country where the clinical trial is conducted, we currently hold coverages ranging from EUR 500,000 to EUR 5,000,000 per occurrence. Such coverage may not be adequate to cover all liabilities that we may incur. We may need to increase our insurance coverage as we expand our clinical trials. In addition, insurance coverage is increasingly expensive. We may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in an amount adequate to satisfy any liability that may arise. In the event insurance coverage is insufficient to cover liabilities that we may incur, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Healthcare legislative and regulatory reform measures may have a material adverse effect on our financial operations.
Our industry is highly regulated and changes in law may adversely impact our business, operations, or financial results. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (the “PPACA”), is a sweeping measure intended to, among other things, expand healthcare coverage within the U.S., primarily through the imposition of health insurance mandates on employers and individuals and expansion of the Medicaid program. Several provisions of the law may affect us and increase certain of our costs.
In addition, other legislative changes have been adopted since the PPACA was enacted. These changes include aggregate reductions in Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect on April 1, 2013, Congress subsequently has extended the period over which these reductions are in effect. While President Biden previously signed legislation temporarily to eliminate this reduction through the end of 2021, a 1% payment adjustment was implemented from April 1 – June 30, 2022, and a 2% payment adjustment took effect beginning July 1, 2022. In January 2013, President Obama signed into law the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several types of providers and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years. These laws may result in additional reductions in Medicare and other healthcare funding, which could have a material adverse effect on our customers and, accordingly, our financial operations.
We anticipate that the PPACA, as well as other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future, may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and additional downward pressure on pricing and the reimbursement our customers may receive for our products, and increased manufacturer rebates. Further, there have been, and there may continue to be, judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the PPACA. For example, the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 includes a provision repealing, effective January 1, 2019, the tax-based shared responsibility payment imposed by the Affordable Care Act on certain individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year that is commonly referred to as the “individual mandate”. Additional legislative and regulatory changes to the PPACA, its implementing regulations and guidance and its policies, remain possible. However, it remains unclear how any new legislation or regulation might affect the prices we may obtain for any of our product candidates for which regulatory approval is obtained. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare and other government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payers. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our products.
Our future growth may depend, in part, on our ability to penetrate markets outside of the U.S. and Europe where we would be subject to additional regulatory burdens and other risks and uncertainties.
Our future profitability may depend, in part, on our ability to commercialize current or future drug candidates in foreign markets for which we may rely on collaborations with third parties. We are not permitted to market or promote any of our drug candidates before we receive regulatory approval from the applicable regulatory authority in that foreign market. To obtain separate regulatory approval in many other jurisdictions we must comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of such jurisdictions regarding safety and efficacy and governing, among other things, clinical trials, manufacturing, commercial sales, pricing and distribution of our drug candidates, and we cannot predict success in these jurisdictions.
67
There may be future changes in legal and regulatory requirements that may materially impact our results of operations.
Future changes in legal and regulatory requirements may introduce new risks into our operations and future prospects, which we are not able to currently anticipate. By example, changes taking place in the United States associated with a new federal administration, as well as changes in legal and regulatory standards, including the reduced level of deference due to administrative agencies following a 2024 Supreme Court decision, may introduce uncertainties with respect to our current and future operations and our future likelihood of success. It is possible that new federal or state laws or regulations may be passed, or laws and regulations may be enforced differently than they were before, which may expose us to additional legal and regulatory risk or uncertainty and require the expenditure of additional resources to ensure that we are able to comply. Such actions could also adversely restrict our business and operations. There could also be changes in FDA’s approval standards that could impact our ability to obtain BLA approval and market our product candidates within the currently anticipated timeframes or otherwise impact the competitive market for our product candidates. Such changes may necessitate the conduct of additional development work, including preclinical and clinical trials, and manufacturing development. By example, for products intended for rare and serious diseases with unmet medical needs, FDA is authorized to exercise regulatory flexibility when making a medical risk-benefit judgment. It is possible that whether and how FDA exercises any such regulatory flexibility, including with respect to specialized pathways, such as accelerated approval, may change, which could impact our ability to obtain approval for AMT-130 or any of our product candidates. Further, legal and regulatory changes may impact how we may market and sell our products in the future, if they are approved, as well as how they are reimbursed. Moreover, there could be changes in the federal workforce and agency policies that may result in regulatory delays, including with respect to FDA’s review of marketing applications and other submissions, and that may impact the ability to communicate with and obtain guidance from the agencies. At this time, it is too early to predict the exact nature of any changes that may take place or whether and how they may impact our business and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Ordinary Shares
The market price of our ordinary shares has been and may in the future be volatile and fluctuate substantially.
Our ordinary share price has been and may in the future be volatile. From the start of trading of our ordinary shares on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on February 4, 2014 through May 6, 2025 the sale price of our ordinary shares ranged from a high of $82.49 to a low of $3.73. The closing price on May 6, 2025 was $11.48 per ordinary share.
In recent years, the stock market in general and the market for shares of biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies in particular have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to changes in the operating performance of the companies whose stock is experiencing those price and volume fluctuations. The market price for our ordinary shares may be influenced by many factors, including:
● | the success of competing products or technologies; |
● | results of our clinical trials or those of our competitors; |
● | public perception and market reaction to our interim data from our clinical trials; |
● | public perception of gene therapies and companies developing gene therapies; |
● | interactions with the FDA and other regulatory authorities on the design of our clinical trials, regulatory endpoints and accelerated approval pathways available to us; |
● | regulatory delays and greater government regulation of potential products due to adverse events; |
● | regulatory, legal and political developments in the EU, the U.S., and other countries; |
● | developments or disputes concerning patent applications, issued patents or other proprietary rights; |
● | the recruitment or departure of key personnel; |
● | pipeline reprioritizations, strategic transactions and restructurings; |
● | future issuances, sales, resales or repurchases or anticipated issuances, sales, resales or repurchases, of our ordinary shares, including due to the expiration of contractual lock-up agreements; |
● | the level of expenses related to any of our product candidates or clinical development programs; |
● | the results of our efforts to discover, develop, acquire or in-license additional product candidates or technologies; |
● | actual or anticipated changes in estimates as to financial results, development timelines; |
68
● | failure to meet expectations of investors or securities analysts; |
● | variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us; |
● | changes in the structure of healthcare payment systems; |
● | market conditions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors; |
● | mergers, acquisitions, licensing, and collaboration activity among our peer companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors; |
● | general economic, industry and market conditions; and |
● | the realization of any of the factors described in this “Risk Factors” section. |
Following periods of such market volatility, securities class actions have been brought against companies experiencing such volatility in the price of their securities. Because of the potential volatility of our ordinary share price, we may become the target of securities litigation in the future. In addition, notwithstanding protective provisions in our articles of association and available to us under Dutch corporate law, market volatility may lead to increased shareholder activism if we experience a market valuation that activist investors believe is not reflective of the intrinsic value of our ordinary shares. Activist campaigns that contest or conflict with our strategic direction or seek changes in the composition of our board of directors could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. Securities litigation or shareholder activism could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources from our business.
Our directors, executive officers, and major shareholders, if they choose to act together, will continue to have a significant degree of control with respect to matters submitted to shareholders for approval.
Our directors, executive officers and major shareholders holding more than 5% of our outstanding ordinary shares, in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately 22.7% of our issued share capital. As a result, if these shareholders were to choose to act together, they may be able, as a practical matter, to influence many matters submitted to our shareholders for approval, as well as our management and affairs. For example, these shareholders, if they choose to act together, could influence the election of the board of directors and the approval of any merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all our assets. These shareholders may have interests that differ from those of other of our shareholders and conflicts of interest may arise.
The rights and responsibilities of our shareholders and directors are governed by Dutch law and differ in some important respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders under U.S. law.
We are a public limited liability company (naamloze vennootschap) organized under the laws of the Netherlands and our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of association and by the laws governing companies incorporated in the Netherlands. The rights of our shareholders and the responsibilities of members of our board under Dutch law are different than under the laws of some U.S. jurisdictions. Under Dutch law, our board members are required to act in the long-term interest of the company, considering the interests of shareholders, employees, and other stakeholders. This governance approach differs from that of some U.S. jurisdictions, where directors may focus primarily on maximizing shareholder value. As a result, decisions made by our board may be different than those that would be taken by a company organized under the law of some U.S. jurisdictions.
In addition, in accordance with our articles of association, approval of our shareholders is required before our board of directors can authorize the issuance of our ordinary shares in an equity financing, such as the public offering of our ordinary shares completed in January 2025. Our shareholders’ reluctance to approve further issuances of ordinary shares could adversely affect our ability to raise capital and fund development programs and continued operations. Dutch corporate governance laws evolve over time, and future changes may impact the governance structure and shareholder rights applicable to Dutch public limited companies whose securities are traded in the United States or otherwise adversely affect the rights of investors.
For more information on relevant provisions of Dutch corporate law and of our articles of association, see the description of our capital stock included in Exhibit 4.1 and our articles of association filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our Annual Report.
69
Provisions of our articles of association or Dutch corporate law might deter acquisition bids for us that might otherwise be considered favorable and could make it more difficult to replace our board, ensuring continuity and stability in corporate governance in line with Dutch law and case law requirements. t.
Under Dutch law, various protective measures are possible and permissible within the boundaries set by Dutch statutory and case law. Certain provisions of our articles of association may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us or effect a change in our board. These provisions include:
● | the staggered three-year terms of our non-executive directors as a result of which only approximately one-third of our non-executive directors may be subject to election or re-election in any one year; |
● | a provision that our directors may only be dismissed or suspended at a general meeting of shareholders by a two-thirds majority of votes cast representing more than half of our outstanding ordinary shares; |
● | a provision that our executive directors may only be appointed upon binding nomination of the non-executive directors, which can only be overruled by the general meeting of shareholders with a two-thirds majority of votes cast representing at least 50% of our outstanding ordinary shares; and |
● | a requirement that certain matters, including an amendment of our articles of association, may only be brought to our shareholders for a vote upon a proposal by our board. |
Furthermore, in accordance with Dutch corporate law, shareholders with the right to propose agenda items for the general meeting or request the convening of a general meeting must first engage in consultation with the board. If exercising such rights may result in a change in our strategy (for example, through the dismissal of one or more directors), the board must be given the opportunity to invoke a reasonable period to respond to the shareholders’ intentions. If invoked, the board must use such response period for further deliberation and constructive consultation with the concerned shareholder(s) and thereafter report on this consultation and the exploration of alternatives to the general meeting. The response period may be invoked only once for any given general meeting and shall not apply in respect of a matter for which a response period or a statutory cooling-off period (as discussed below) has been previously invoked.
Moreover, according to Dutch corporate law, our board can invoke a cooling-off period of up to 250 days in the event of an unsolicited takeover bid or certain shareholder activism. Shareholders representing at least 3% of our issued share capital may request the Enterprise Chamber (Ondernemingskamer) for early termination of the cooling-off period. The Enterprise Chamber must rule in favor of the request if the shareholders can demonstrate that (i) our board of directors, in light of the circumstances at hand when the cooling-off period was invoked, could not reasonably have concluded that the relevant proposal or hostile offer constituted a material conflict with the interests of our company and its business, or (ii) our board of directors cannot reasonably believe that a continuation of the cooling-off period would contribute to careful policy-making; or (iii) other defensive measures, having the same purpose, nature, and scope as the cooling-off period, have been activated during the cooling-off period.
We do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, any returns on an investment in our ordinary shares will likely depend entirely upon any future appreciation in the price of our ordinary shares, which is uncertain.
We have not paid any dividends since our incorporation. Even if future operations lead to significant levels of distributable profits, we currently expect those earnings, if any, will be reinvested in our business and that dividends will not be paid until we have an established revenue stream to support paying dividends. In addition, payment of future cash dividends may be made only if our shareholders’ (deficit) / equity exceeds the sum of our paid-in and called-up share capital plus the reserves required to be maintained by Dutch law or by our articles of association. Accordingly, shareholders cannot rely on dividend income from our ordinary shares and any returns on an investment in our ordinary shares will likely depend entirely upon any future appreciation in the price of our ordinary shares.
70
We have in the past qualified and in the future may qualify as a passive foreign investment company, which may result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders.
We believe that we were a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for the 2024 taxable year. A corporation organized outside the U.S. generally will be classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes in any taxable year in which at least 75% of its gross income is passive income or on average at least 50% of the gross value of its assets is attributable to assets that produce passive income or are held to produce passive income. Passive income for this purpose generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents and gains from commodities and securities transactions. Our status in any taxable year will depend on our assets and activities in each year, and because this is a factual determination made annually after the end of each taxable year, there can be no assurance that we will continue to qualify as a PFIC in future taxable years. The market value of our assets may be determined in large part by reference to the market price of our ordinary shares, which is likely to fluctuate, and may fluctuate considerably given that market prices of biotechnology companies have been especially volatile. If we were considered a PFIC for the current taxable year or any future taxable year during which a U.S. holder holds ordinary shares, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences may apply to such U.S. holders and a such U.S. holder would be required to file annual information returns for such year, whether the U.S. holder disposed of any ordinary shares or received any distributions in respect of ordinary shares during such year. A U.S. holder may be able to make certain tax elections that would lessen the adverse impact of PFIC status; however, in order to make certain of such elections the U.S. holder will usually have to have been provided information about the company by us, and we do not intend to provide such information.
The U.S. federal income tax rules relating to PFICs are complex. U.S. holders are urged to consult their tax advisors with respect to the purchase, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares, the possible implications to them of our being treated as a PFIC (including the availability of applicable elections, and whether making any such election would be advisable in their particular circumstances) as well as the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax considerations applicable to such holders in connection with the purchase, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares.
Any U.S. or other foreign judgments may be difficult to enforce against us in the Netherlands.
Although we report as a U.S. domestic filer for SEC reporting purposes, we are organized and existing under the laws of the Netherlands. Accordingly, under Dutch private international law, the rights and obligations of our shareholders vis-à-vis the company originating from Dutch corporate law and our articles of association, as well as the civil liability of our officers (functionarissen), including our directors and executive officers, are governed in certain respects by Dutch law.
Certain of our executive officers reside outside the United States. Depending on the subject matter of the action brought against us and/or our officers, United States courts may lack jurisdiction over such persons. If a Dutch court has jurisdiction, that court will apply Dutch procedural law and Dutch private international law to determine applicable substantive law. Depending on the subject matter of the claim, a competent Dutch court may apply Dutch law rather than U.S. securities law. In addition, a significant portion of our assets are located outside the U.S. As a result, it may not be possible for shareholders to effect service of process within the U.S. upon such persons or to enforce judgments against them or us in U.S. courts, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the U.S. Dutch courts typically do not apply U.S. securities laws directly, but they may consider them if a claim is refiled under Dutch legal principles (such as under general tort law (onrechtmatige daad).
71
The U.S. and the Netherlands currently do not have a treaty providing for the automatic recognition and enforcement of judgments, other than arbitration awards, in civil and commercial matters. In addition, both the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements (2005) and the Hague Judgments Convention (2019) have entered into force for the Netherlands but have not entered into force for the United States. As a result, a final judgment for payment given by a court in the U.S., whether or not predicated solely upon U.S. securities laws, would not automatically be recognized or enforced in the Netherlands. To obtain a judgment which is enforceable in the Netherlands, the party in whose favor a final and conclusive judgment of the U.S. court has been rendered will be required to file its claim with a court of competent jurisdiction in the Netherlands. Such party may submit to the Dutch court the final judgment rendered by the U.S. court. If and to the extent that the Dutch court finds that the jurisdiction of the U.S. court has been based on grounds which are internationally acceptable and that proper legal procedures have been observed, the Dutch court will, in principle, give binding effect to the judgment of the U.S. court, unless such judgment contravenes Dutch public policy (ordre public). Dutch courts may deny the recognition and enforcement of punitive damages or damages that exceed actual compensation. Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are solely governed by the Dutch Civil Procedure Code (Wetboek van Burgerlijke Rechtsvordering).
Therefore U.S. shareholders may not be able to enforce against us or our board members or senior management who are residents of the Netherlands or countries other than the U.S. any judgments obtained in U.S. courts in civil and commercial matters, including judgments under the U.S. federal securities laws.
We are not obligated to, and do not, comply with all best practice provisions of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code.
We are subject to the Dutch Corporate Governance Code (the “DCGC”). The DCGC contains principles and best practice provisions on corporate governance that regulate relations between the board and the general meeting and matters in respect of financial reporting, auditors, disclosure, compliance and enforcement standards. The DCGC follows the principle of “comply or explain”. Accordingly, companies must disclose in their statutory annual reports whether they comply with the provisions of the DCGC. If a company, subject to the DCGC, does not comply with certain provisions, it must provide an explanation for such non-compliance. While we are subject to the DCGC, we do not comply with all of its best practice provisions. This may affect your rights as a shareholder and you may not have the same level of protection as a shareholder in a Dutch company that fully complies with the DCGC.
General Risks
Our future success depends on our ability to retain key executives, technical staff, and other employees and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.
Our future growth and success will depend in large part on our continued ability to attract, retain, manage, and motivate our employees. The loss of the services of any member of our senior management or the inability to hire or retain experienced management personnel could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan and harm our operating results. We are highly dependent on hiring, training, retaining, and motivating key personnel to lead our research and development, clinical operations, and manufacturing efforts. Although we have entered into employment agreements with our key personnel, each of them may terminate their employment subject to the notice provisions in such agreements. We do not maintain key person insurance for any of our senior management or employees.
The loss of the services of our key employees could impede the achievement of our research and development objectives and seriously harm our ability to successfully implement our business strategy. Furthermore, replacing senior management and key employees may be difficult and may take an extended period because of the limited number of individuals in our industry with the breadth and depth of skills and experience required to successfully develop gene therapy products. The competition for qualified personnel in the pharmaceutical field is intense, and there is a limited pool of qualified potential employees to recruit. Due to this intense competition, we may be unable to continue to attract and retain the qualified personnel necessary for the development of our business or to recruit suitable replacement personnel. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain high quality personnel, our ability to pursue our business may be harmed and our growth strategy may be limited.
72
We may be adversely affected by unstable market and economic conditions and potential macroeconomic effects, such as inflation, new or increased tariffs and higher interest rates, which may negatively impact our business, financial condition and share price.
Macroeconomic conditions beyond our control such as economic instability, changes in tax laws and regulations, including based on the recent U.S. presidential election, trade restrictions, additional tariffs, export controls, inflation, high interest rates, volatile energy costs, geopolitical issues, armed hostilities, such as the ongoing conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East, unstable global credit markets and financial conditions could lead to periods of significant economic instability, diminished liquidity and credit availability, diminished expectations for the global economy and expectations of slower global economic growth going forward. Our business and operations may be adversely affected by such instability, including any such inflationary fluctuations, economic downturns, volatile business environments and continued unstable or unpredictable economic and market conditions. Inflation in particular has the potential to adversely affect our liquidity, business, financial condition, and results of operations by increasing our overall cost structure. The existence of inflation in the economy has resulted in, and may continue to result in, higher interest rates and capital costs, shipping costs, supply shortages, increased costs of labor, weakening exchange rates and other similar effects. As a result of inflation, we have experienced, and may continue to experience, cost increases across our business. Although we may take measures to mitigate the impact of this inflation, if these measures are not effective our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity could be materially adversely affected. Even if such measures are effective, there could be a difference between the timing of when these beneficial actions impact our results of operations and when cost inflation is incurred.
Any such volatility and disruptions may have adverse consequences on us or the third parties on whom we rely. If economic and market conditions deteriorate or do not improve, it may make any future financing efforts more difficult to complete, more costly and more dilutive to our shareholders. Additionally, due to our volatile industry and industry-wide declining stock values, investors may seek to pursue investments outside of the biotechnology sector with more predictable investment returns. Failure to secure any necessary financing in a timely manner or on favorable terms could have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial condition or share price or could require us to delay or abandon development or commercialization plans.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may be unable to accurately report our results of operations or prevent fraud or fail to meet our reporting obligations, and investor confidence and the market price of our ordinary shares may be materially and adversely affected.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with applicable accounting principles. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting or disclosure controls, we could experience material misstatements in our financial statements and fail to meet our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, which would likely cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information or disclosures. This could in turn limit our access to capital markets and our ability to fund our business, harm our results of operations, and could lead to a decline in the trading price of our ordinary shares. Additionally, ineffective internal control over financial reporting could expose us to increased risk of fraud or misuse of corporate assets and subject us to potential delisting from The Nasdaq Global Select Market, regulatory investigations and civil or criminal sanctions. Our reporting and compliance obligations may place a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources, and systems for the foreseeable future.
73
Our internal computer systems, or those of our collaborators, third-party vendors, contractors or consultants, may fail or suffer security breaches, which could result in a material disruption of our business and development programs.
Our internal computer systems and those of our current and any future collaborators and other contractors or consultants are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses and hackers, malicious code, employee theft or misuse, sophisticated nation-state and nation-state-supported actors, unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures, among other potential risks. The size and complexity of our information technology systems, and those of our collaborators, third-party vendors, contractors and consultants, and the large amounts of proprietary and confidential information stored on these systems, make such systems vulnerable to service interruptions or to security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees, third-party vendors and/or business partners, or from cyber-attacks by malicious third parties. Cyber-attacks are increasing in their frequency, sophistication, and intensity, and have become increasingly difficult to detect. Cyber-attacks could include the deployment of harmful malware, ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, social engineering, and other means to affect service reliability and threaten the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information. Cyber-attacks also could include phishing attempts or e-mail fraud to cause payments or information to be transmitted to an unintended recipient. Our hybrid remote work policy may increase our vulnerability to such risks.
While we have experienced and addressed system failures, cyber-attacks, and security breaches in the past, we have not experienced a system failure, accident, cyber-attack, or security breach that has resulted in a material interruption in our operations to date. In the future, such events could result in a material disruption of our development programs and our business operations, whether due to a loss of our trade secrets, data, or other proprietary information or other similar disruptions. Additionally, any such event that leads to unauthorized access, use or disclosure of personal information, including personal information regarding patients involved in our clinical trials or our employees, could harm our reputation, cause us not to comply with federal and/or state breach notification laws and foreign law equivalents and otherwise subject us to liability under laws and regulations that protect the privacy and security of personal information and expose us to claims for damages, regulatory fines, penalties or litigation. Security breaches and other inappropriate access can be difficult to detect, and any delay in identifying them may lead to increased harm of the type described above. We may need to devote significant resources to protect against security breaches or to address problems caused by a cyber-attack or security breach. While we have implemented security measures designed to protect our information technology systems and infrastructure, there can be no assurance that such measures will prevent service interruptions or security breaches that could adversely affect our business and the further development and commercialization of our product and product candidates could be delayed.
See Part I, Item 1C, Cybersecurity, in our Annual Report for more information regarding our cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish, cease to publish or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our ordinary shares depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not control these analysts, or the content and opinions included in their reports. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrades our ordinary shares or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our ordinary share price could decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our shares could decrease, which might cause our share price and trading volume to decline.
74
If we do not achieve our projected development and financial goals in the timeframes we announce and expect, the commercialization of our product candidates may be delayed and, as a result, our share price may decline.
We estimate the timing of the accomplishment of various scientific, clinical, regulatory, and other product development goals, along with financial and other business-related milestones. From time to time, we publicly announce the expected timing of some of these milestones along with guidance as to our cash runway. These milestones may include the commencement or completion of scientific studies, clinical trials, the submission of regulatory filings and interactions with regulatory authorities, along with expected regulatory approval timelines for our product candidates. These milestones are based on a variety of assumptions that may prove to be untrue. The timing of our actual achievement of these milestones can vary dramatically compared to our estimates, in many cases for reasons beyond our control. If we do not meet these milestones, including those that are publicly announced, the development and commercialization of our products may be delayed, our business could suffer reputational harm and, as a result, our share price may decline.
Environmental sustainability and social initiatives that we undertake may impose additional costs on our business and expose us to new risks.
Concern over the impact of climate change may result in new or additional legislative and regulatory requirements to reduce or mitigate its effects on the environment, which could result in increased expenses and expenditure of company resources as we seek to comply with such requirements. More broadly, there has been increasing public focus by shareholders, patients, activists, the media, governmental and non-governmental organizations and other constituencies on a variety of environmental, social and other sustainability matters, resulting in new and pending international agreements and national, regional, and local legislation, regulatory measures, public reporting obligations and potential policy changes across jurisdictions.
We may experience pressure in some of the countries in which we operate to make commitments with respect to our greenhouse gas emissions as well as other sustainability-focused matters. These agreements and measures, including the Paris Climate Accord, may require, or could result in future legislation, regulatory measures or policy changes that would require operational changes, taxes, or purchases of emission credits to reduce emission of greenhouse gases from our operations, including new reporting requirements for businesses operating in the European Union, which may require the that we dedicate additional capital and personnel resources toward compliance with these measures. If we fail to comply with new laws, regulations or reporting requirements, our reputation and business could be harmed. Furthermore, increasing attention on environmental and sustainability matters has resulted in governmental investigations, and public and private litigation, which could increase our costs or otherwise adversely affect our business or results of operations. We cannot guarantee that any initiatives we adopt to respond to stakeholder expectations will have the desired effect. Moreover, initiatives that we adopt in some countries in which we operate may be viewed differently in other countries in which we operate. Any failure to meet the expectations of our investors, regulators, stock exchanges or other stakeholders with respect to sustainability matters could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
75
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities, Use of Proceeds, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5.Other Information
During the three months ended March 31, 2025, each of the following officers adopted a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” (as defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K) that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act and our policies on insider trading:
Name & Title |
Date Adopted(1) |
Aggregate Number of Ordinary Shares to be Purchased or Sold Pursuant to Trading Arrangement |
Expiration Date(2) |
Matthew Kapusta Chief Executive Officer |
January 28, 2025(3) |
226,316 |
June 30, 2026 |
Christian Klemt Chief Financial Officer |
January 13, 2025 |
124,750 |
December 31, 2026 |
(1) Date of adoption of this Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement is in accordance with applicable SEC rules and regulations. The first trade pursuant to this Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement will be, in accordance with applicable SEC rules and regulations, on a date after the date of adoption of the Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement, to the extent triggered under its terms.
(2) The Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement permits transactions through and including the earlier to occur of (a) the completion of all sales or (b) the date listed in the table. The arrangement also provides for automatic expiration in the event of bankruptcy, insolvency, death or mental incapacity of the adopting person.
(3) Sales under the 10b5-1 trading arrangement referred to in the table above for Mr. Kapusta will begin no earlier than (i) August 26, 2025 or (ii) the completion of all sales under Mr. Kapusta’s 10b5-1 trading arrangement dated August 12, 2024 (the terms of which are disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2024).
Other than those disclosed above, none of our directors or officers adopted, modified, or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” in each case as defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K, during the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Item 6.Exhibits
See the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the signature page to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a list of exhibits filed or furnished with this report, which Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.
76
EXHIBIT INDEX
10.1t |
|
|
|
10.2t |
Amended and Restated uniQure N.V. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective as of April 15, 2025. |
|
|
31.1* |
|
|
|
31.2* |
|
|
|
32.1± |
|
|
|
101 |
The following financial information from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2025, is formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language (“iXBRL”): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (tagged as blocks of text) |
|
|
104* |
The cover page from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2025, is formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language (“iXBRL”) |
* Filed herewith.
± Furnished herewith.
tIndicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
77
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
UNIQURE N.V. |
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Matthew Kapusta Matthew Kapusta Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Christian Klemt Christian Klemt Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Date: May 9, 2025
78
Exhibit 10.1
AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into and effective as of April 15, 2025 (the “Effective Date”), by and between uniQure, Inc., 113 Hartwell Avenue, Lexington, MA 02421, on behalf of itself and any and all of its affiliates (together, the “Company”), and Matthew Craig Kapusta, [**] (“Executive” and together with the Company, the “Parties”).
RECITALS
A. |
WHEREAS, Executive is currently employed as, and the Company desires to continue to employ Executive as, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). |
B. |
WHEREAS, Executive wishes to continue to be employed by the Company and to serve in such capacity under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. |
C. |
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are party to that certain Employment Agreement (the “Prior Employment Agreement”) originally dated December 9, 2014, and as subsequently amended on October 19, 2016, March 14, 2017, October 26, 2017, and December 20, 2017. |
D. |
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend and restate the Prior Employment Agreement, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement without any overlap, gap or discontinuity in the employment of Executive. |
E. |
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive agree that the terms, provisions and mutual covenants of this Agreement suffice as adequate consideration for their mutual promises made in this Agreement. |
TERM AND CONDITIONS
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. |
Position and Duties; Location. |
1.1 |
Executive will serve the Company as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, with such authority, duties and responsibilities as are commensurate with such position. Executive shall report directly to and be subject to the overall direction and authority of the Board of Directors of uniQure, N.V. (the “Board”). As of the Effective Date, Executive serves as a member of the Board and during the Term, the Board shall renominate Executive to be elected to serve on the Board, consistent with the provisions of the governing documents of the Company, as amended and in effect from time to time. |
1.2 |
Executive acknowledges and agrees that his termination of employment from the Company for any reason shall require his immediate resignation from any positions held or appointments by uniQure N.V. (as provided in Section 10.2, below) and, if he fails to do so, it shall constitute sufficient grounds for the Board to remove him from such position(s). |
1.3 |
Executive will be based in the Company’s U.S. headquarters in Lexington MA, USA or such other location where the Company’s U.S. headquarters may be relocated from time to time by the Board (subject to Section 9.5(iii) below); provided, however, that Executive |
Matthew Kapusta |
1 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
may be required to travel as necessary and appropriate or as reasonably required by the Company for business purposes.
1.4 |
Executive acknowledges and agrees that he is an “exempt” employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act. |
2. |
Standards of Performance/Extent of Services. |
During the Term, Executive shall devote his full business time and attention to the business of the Company and his duties under this Agreement and shall discharge them faithfully, industriously and to the best of his ability, experience and talents. Executive shall be subject to the Company’s policies, procedures, and approval practices, as generally in effect from time to time and that are not in conflict with this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything in this Agreement to the contrary, Executive shall be permitted:
2.1 |
to spend reasonable amounts of time to manage his personal, financial and legal affairs; |
2.2 |
to invest his assets in a manner not prohibited by Section 6 of this Agreement, and in a form or manner that does not require any material services on his part in the operations or affairs of the companies or other entities in which the investments are made, provided that nothing in this Agreement shall preclude Executive from investing his personal assets in one or more mutual funds or other publicly available investment funds that may include investments in publicly traded companies or financial institutions that may be in competition with the Company; |
2.3 |
to serve on the board of directors of any for-profit company, subject to written approval of the Board, which will not be unreasonably withheld. If the Board later makes a reasonable, good faith determination that Executive’s continued service on another company’s board would be detrimental to the Company, the Board will give Executive thirty (30) days’ written notice that such original approval has been revoked, and Executive will resign from the applicable board within thirty (30) days after his receipt of such notice; or |
2.4 |
to engage in religious, charitable, or other community or non-profit activities (including serving on civic, charitable, not-for-profit or industry boards); provided that such activities, individually and collectively, do not materially interfere with the performance of Executive’s duties hereunder. |
3. |
Term. |
Executive’s term of employment with the Company under this Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and shall continue in force and effect from year to year unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 9 hereof (the “Term”).
4. |
Compensation and Benefits. |
The regular compensation and benefits payable to Executive under this Agreement are as follows:
4.1 |
Base Salary. For all services rendered by Executive under this Agreement during the Term, the Company will pay him a base salary at the annual rate of six hundred seventy-six thousand seven hundred dollars (US $676,700.00), which shall be reviewed annually by the Board for increase (the base salary in effect at any time, the “Base Salary”). Executive’s |
Matthew Kapusta |
2 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
Base Salary shall be paid in bi-weekly installments, less withholdings as required by law and deductions authorized by Executive, and payable pursuant to the Company’s regular payroll practices in effect from time to time.
4.2 |
Discretionary Bonus. Executive will be eligible to receive an annual performance bonus (a “Bonus”) after the end of each calendar year with a target bonus amount of 60% of Executive’s Base Salary. Eligibility for the Bonus shall be determined based on achieving the annual incentive milestones established, in good faith, by the Board (after consultation with Executive in the ordinary course), Executive’s overall performance, the Company’s performance and financial condition as stated in the Company’s short-term incentive plan guidelines, except as provided in Section 9 below, Executive’s active employment on the date that the Bonus is distributed (which shall not be later than March 15 of the year following the calendar year to which the bonus pertains), and in the sole discretion of the Board. |
As used in this Agreement, the term “Pro-rata Bonus” shall mean the product of the formula B x D/365 where:
(1) |
B represents the Bonus that (but for the cessation of Executive’s employment) would otherwise have been payable to Executive for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs (based on actual performance outcomes for that year). For this purpose, the Bonus that would have otherwise been payable to Executive shall be determined in good faith and in the same manner applicable to active named executive officers of the Company and its affiliates; and |
(2) |
D represents the number of days elapsed in the calendar year through the date of the separation of Executive’s employment from the Company. |
4.3 |
Incentive Compensation. During the Term, Executive may be entitled to participate in any cash-based incentive compensation programs made available to executives of the Company generally, in accordance with the terms thereof, as in effect from time to time, and as determined by the Board. Any additional incentive compensation program that is added to Executive’s overall compensation shall be done so in writing, signed by Executive and a duly authorized representative of the Company and fashioned as an addendum to this Agreement. |
4.4 |
Equity. During the Term, Executive will be eligible for future equity grants, as determined in the Board’s discretion and pursuant to the Company’s policies and procedures as in effect from time to time. Any such equity grants will be made pursuant to the Company’s 2014 Share Incentive Plan, as amended, or any successor plan thereto (as applicable, the “Equity Plan”) and shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Employment Agreement, the Equity Plan and an individual award agreement that will be separately entered into between Executive and the Company. |
4.5 |
Retirement and Welfare Benefits. During the Term, Executive is entitled to participate in any employee benefit plans, medical insurance plans, life insurance plans, disability income plans, retirement plans, and other benefit plans that are in effect for the Company’s executives, as the same may be amended from time to time. Executive’s participation shall be subject to (i) the terms of the applicable plan documents and (ii) generally applicable Company policies. The Company may alter, modify, amend, add to, delete from or |
Matthew Kapusta |
3 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
terminate its employee benefit plans and programs at any time as it, in its sole judgment, determines to be appropriate.
4.6 |
Business Expenses. The Company shall provide the Executive with a credit card issued to, and in the name of, the Company with which to pay all reasonable travel, entertainment and other business expenses that the Executive incurs in the course of performing his duties and responsibilities. The Company may request reasonable and customary documentation for any such expenses. The Company shall pay the reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred by the Executive in connection with the negotiation and documentation of this Agreement. |
4.7 |
Paid Time Off and Holidays. Executive shall be entitled to accrue twenty-five (25) days of paid time off in each calendar year during the term of this Agreement, which shall accrue ratably at the rate of 2.08 days per month. Executive is also entitled to all paid holidays observed by the Company in the United States. Executive shall have all rights and be subject to all obligations and responsibilities with respect to paid time off and holidays as are set forth in the Company’s employee manual or other applicable policies and procedures. |
4.8 |
Cell Phone; Other Electronic Devices. The Company shall provide Executive with a portable smart phone and suitable laptop and/or other similar computing device and shall pay or reimburse Executive for Executive’s use and operation of this equipment, in each case, subject to the Company’s employee manual and other applicable policies and procedures. It is acknowledged that Executive may use such devices for reasonable personal use. It is also acknowledged that in the event Executive ports any of his existing phone numbers to a device owned by the Company, or if a new cell phone number is established (either by Executive or by the Company) for Executive to use such device, Executive shall retain ownership of such phone number(s) upon the separation of employment and the Company shall cooperate with the transfer of the phone number(s) to a device and carrier that Executive designates. |
4.9 |
Withholdings. All amounts set forth in this Agreement are on a gross, pre-tax basis and shall be subject to all applicable federal, state, local and foreign withholding, payroll and other taxes, and the Company may withhold from any amounts payable to Executive (including any amounts payable pursuant to this Agreement) in order to comply with such withholding obligations. |
5. |
Inventions and Developments. |
5.1 |
The term “Products” as used herein shall mean all products and services developed and/or licensed to third parties, being developed, sold, or otherwise distributed by the Company, during the term of Executive’s employment. |
5.2 |
Disclosure. Executive shall promptly and fully disclose to the Company any and all inventions, discoveries, developments, improvements, software and writings, concepts and ideas, whether or not patentable, that are authored, conceived, developed, reduced to practice or prepared by Executive alone or by Executive and others, either within or without the Company, during the period of Executive’s employment with the Company, relating to either the Products or to any prospective activities of the Company known to Executive as a consequence of employment with the Company (the “Inventions”). |
Matthew Kapusta |
4 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
5.3 |
Further Assurances. Upon and/or following disclosure of each Invention to the Company, Executive will, during Executive’s employment and at any time thereafter, at the request and cost of the Company, sign, execute, make and do all such deeds, instruments, documents, acts and things as the Company and its duly authorized agents may reasonably require to apply for, obtain and vest in the name of the Company alone (unless the Company otherwise directs) letters patent, copyrights or other analogous protection in any country throughout the world, including all right, title and interest in the Inventions, and when so obtained or vested to renew and restore the same; and to defend any opposition proceedings in respect of such applications and any opposition proceedings or petitions or applications for revocation of such letters patent, copyright or other analogous protection. |
5.4 |
Works Made For Hire. Executive acknowledges that all documentation, works of authorship and copyrightable works prepared in whole or in part by Executive, jointly or singly, in the course of Executive’s employment, whether on the Company’s time or on Executive’s own time, including without limitation all Inventions, shall be “works made for hire” under the Copyright Act of 1976 (the “Copyright Act”), and shall be the sole property of the Company and the Company shall be the sole author of such works within the meaning of the Copyright Act. All such works (the “Work Product”), as well as all copies of such works in whatever medium, shall be owned exclusively by the Company and Executive hereby expressly disclaims any and all interests in such works. If the copyright to any such work shall not be the property of the Company by operation of law, Executive hereby and without further consideration, irrevocably assigns to the Company all right, title and interest in such work, including all so-called “moral rights,” and will assist the Company and its nominees in every proper way, at the Company’s expense, to secure, maintain and defend for the Company’s own benefit copyrights and any extensions and renewals thereof on such work, including translations thereof in any and all countries, such work to be and to remain the property of the Company whether copyrighted or not. If the foregoing moral rights cannot be so assigned under the applicable laws of the countries in which such rights exist, Executive hereby waives such moral rights and consents to any action of the Company that would violate such rights in the absence of such consent. Executive warrants that no Work Product shall contain any material owned by any third party, except as disclosed to the Company pursuant to Section 5.2, and that as to any such material, Executive shall have all rights necessary to provide to the Company the full, unrestricted benefits to such material as incorporated into the Work Product. |
5.5 |
Assignment. Without in any way limiting the foregoing, Executive hereby assigns to the Company all right, title and interest to all Inventions, including but not limited to patent rights and copyrights. |
5.6 |
Power of Attorney. In the event the Company is unable, after reasonable effort, to secure Executive’s signature on any letters patent, copyright or other analogous protection relating to an Invention, whether because of Executive’s physical or mental incapacity or for any other reason whatsoever, Executive hereby irrevocably designates and appoints the Company and its duly authorized officers and agents as his agent and attorney-in-fact, to act for and in his behalf and stead to execute and file any such application or applications and to do all other lawfully permitted acts to further the prosecution thereon with the same legal force and effect as if executed by Executive. |
5.7 |
Executive Developments. Executive represents that all developments, inventions, works of authorship or other intellectual property rights to which Executive claims ownership as of the date of this Agreement (the “Executive Developments”), and which the parties agree |
Matthew Kapusta |
5 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
are excluded from this Agreement, are listed in Exhibit A attached hereto. If no such Executive Developments are listed on Exhibit A, Executive represents that there are no such Executive Developments at the time of signing this Agreement.
5.8 |
After the date hereof, Executive will promptly disclose to the Company and the Company agrees to receive all disclosures in confidence, any improvements, discoveries, software, designs or writing of Executive that exist, regardless of the state of completion, to determine if they shall be deemed Inventions. |
6. |
Restrictive Covenants. |
THIS SECTION MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHT TO ACCEPT EMPLOYMENT WITH OTHER EMPLOYERS AFTER YOUR EMPLOYMENT WITH THE COMPANY ENDS
6.1 |
For the purposes of this Section: |
(a) |
“Competing Services” means any product, process, therapy or service of any person or organization other than the Company that is in development or has been commercialized and that involves a gene therapy (i) for the treatment of any disease for which the Company had a product or therapy on the market or in any phase of development during the last two (2) years of Executive’s employment with the Company, including, without limitation, any such products in the field of cardiovascular, central nervous system, liver or metabolic disease; or (ii) that otherwise is or would be directly competitive with the Company for the treatment of the same disease or patients. |
(b) |
“Competing Organization” means any person, entity, or organization, including Executive, engaged in, or that intends to become engaged in, the providing or the production of Competing Services. |
(c) |
“Customer” shall mean any individual or entity with which the Company has contracted to perform work, provide products or render service. |
(d) |
“Prospective Customer” shall mean any individual or entity that, during the twenty-four (24) months prior to termination of Executive’s employment, the Company has solicited with an in-person meeting or through a written proposal to become a Customer of the Company. |
(e) |
“Prohibited Activities” means any specific types of services performed by Executive for the Company or its affiliates at any time during the two (2) years preceding the termination of employment. |
6.2 |
Non-Disclosure of Confidential Information. Executive agrees that during the Term and at all times thereafter, regardless of the reason for termination of employment, Executive will not use or disclose (except as (i) required by applicable law or as permitted under Section 6.13; (ii) in compliance with the order of any court of competent jurisdiction or governmental agency; (iii) in connection with the performance of his duties and responsibilities under this Agreement); or (iv) deemed necessary by Executive’s counsel to use in a proceeding to enforce Executive’s rights under this Agreement (in which case Executive shall utilize the local court’s impoundment procedures to file confidential information under seal), any of the Company’s confidential information. The term |
Matthew Kapusta |
6 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
“confidential information” means trade secrets of the Company, commercially valuable information developed by the Company, or otherwise sensitive information concerning the Company, in each case that has been treated as confidential by the Company. Confidential information may include, without limitation, such things as financial information, business plans, prospects, and opportunities (such as financial product developments or possible acquisitions or dispositions of businesses or facilities), nonpublic personal information relating to Company employees, and all other information of every kind and nature and in any form that is proprietary to the Company and that directly or indirectly has been provided or made available to, or acquired by, Executive. However, the term “confidential information” does not include information that has become part of the public domain by means other than Executive’s violation of his obligations under this Agreement or the wrongdoing of a third party.
6.3 |
Non-competition. Executive agrees that during the Term and for (x) a period of twelve (12) months after the termination of the Term for any reason other than a termination by the Company without Cause or due to layoff or (y) the period set forth in the General Release of Claims attached as Exhibit B to this Agreement, provided that Executive signs and does not revoke such General Release of Claims in connection with a cessation or separation of Executive’s employment due to termination without Cause or due to layoff (the “Non-Competition Period”), Executive shall not, directly or indirectly, perform Prohibited Activities (whether as an employee, consultant, independent contractor, member of a board of directors, or in any other capacity) to a Competing Organization. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall prevent Executive from becoming employed by or otherwise rendering services to a Competing Organization whose business is diversified, if the scope of Executive’s services to such Competing Organization is limited to identifiable parts, segments, entities or business units of such business that are not engaged in providing or producing Competing Services (“Non-Prohibited Activities”); provided that Executive agrees that if he seeks to become employed or otherwise renders services (that are Non-Prohibited Activities) to such a Competing Organization during the Non-Competition Period, prior to Executive’s employment or rendering such services, (i) he shall provide the Company with written assurance from such Competing Organization and from Executive that Executive will not render Prohibited Activities directly or indirectly in connection with any Competing Services, and (ii) Executive receives written approval of Executive’s intended employment or rendering such Non-Prohibited Activities (such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld and shall be provided by the Company within ten (10) days from receipt of the written assurances set forth in subsection (i)). |
6.4 |
Reasonableness of Consideration and Temporal and Geographic Scope. Executive and the Company mutually agree that the Company’s providing to Executive the benefits under this Agreement, including the enhanced severance entitlements under Section 9, constitutes fair and reasonable consideration (independent of Executive’s continued employment) for Executive’s agreement to the restrictions set forth in this Section 6. Executive further agrees that the temporal restrictions set forth in Section 6.3 are fair and are reasonably required for the protection of the Company’s legitimate business interests in light of Executive’s role as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Executive additionally agrees that the lack of geographic scope on the obligations set forth in Section 6.3 is both appropriate and reasonable in light of the fact that the Company competes for business in a variety of regions and markets throughout the world. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event a court of competent jurisdiction disagrees with the parties’ assessment, then the geographic scope shall at minimum include all markets in which Executive’s work had a material presence or influence within the last two (2) years of |
Matthew Kapusta |
7 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
employment, which for purposes of clarity shall include, but may not be limited to, the United States and European Union markets.
6.5 |
Non-Solicitation. Executive agrees that during the Term and for a period of twelve (12) months after the termination of the Term for any reason (the “Non-Solicitation Period”), Executive shall not directly or indirectly: |
(a) |
solicit, entice, induce or attempt to induce any employee, consultant or independent contractor who is performing services during the Non-Solicitation Period or who performed services for the Company during the twelve (12) month period immediately preceding the separation of Executive’s employment from the Company, to discontinue such individual’s or entity’s employment, contractual, or other affiliation with the Company; or |
(b) |
contact, solicit, induce or attempt to induce any Customer, Prospective Customer, supplier, vendor, referral source, or business partner (excluding investors) of the Company and that Executive serviced, had contact with, or learned confidential information about as a result of Executive’s employment at the Company, for the purpose of soliciting the sale of Competing Services to such individual or entity and/or to divert any portion of that individual’s or entity’s business away from the Company. |
(c) |
Prohibition Relating to Social Media Use. The act of communicating with a prohibited contact pursuant to subsections (a) or (b) above through any social media shall constitute prohibited solicitation, and Executive agrees to refrain from doing the same. |
6.6 |
Notice of Subsequent Employment. Executive agrees that, for a period of twelve (12) months after the termination of the Term for any reason, he shall notify the Board in writing of any change of subsequent employment (stating the name and address of the employer and providing the title and a detailed description of the duties of the position). |
6.7 |
Subsequent Presentment of Agreement. Executive agrees that, for a period of twelve (12) months after the termination of the Term for any reason, he shall disclose to any entity that employs him or engages him for compensation in any capacity the restrictions upon Executive’s services set forth in this Agreement. |
6.8 |
Tolling of Post-Employment Obligations. If it is later determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that injunctive relief is warranted to prevent Executive from engaging in certain post-employment conduct, then the restrictive periods shall be tolled for the period of time that Executive is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to have had already been engaging in the prohibited conduct prior to the injunction. |
6.9 |
Enforcement of Covenants. Executive acknowledges that a breach of the restrictive covenants set forth in this Section 6 of this Agreement will cause irreparable injury to the Company, that the Company’s remedies at law will be inadequate in case of any such breach or threatened breach, and that the Company will be entitled to preliminary injunctive relief, without bond, and other injunctive relief in case of any such breach or threatened breach. |
Matthew Kapusta |
8 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
6.10 |
Covenant Not to Sue over Section 6 Restrictions Outside of Massachusetts. In addition to the obligation set forth in Section 14.8, Executive agrees that he will not commence, prosecute, or assist in any way another person or entity to commence or prosecute, any legal action or other proceeding (including but not limited to a declaratory judgment action) against the Company concerning a dispute arising from or relating to Section 6 of this Agreement in any forum or jurisdiction other than the state and federal courts in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Executive further agrees that, in the event he disregards this clause, the Company shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys’ fees and any other costs incurred in staying, transferring, dismissing or otherwise defending such out-of-state action or proceeding. |
6.11 |
Subsequent Material Changes in Employment. The Parties have entered into this Agreement with the understanding that it is possible that Executive’s position, title, duties and responsibilities could increase, decrease, develop, evolve, or otherwise change in a material way. In light of that understanding, the Parties nevertheless intend that this Agreement shall follow Executive throughout the entire course of his employment with the Company (or any affiliates or successors) and that any such subsequent material change within the scope of this Agreement shall not affect either the enforceability or the validity of this Agreement. |
6.12 |
Non-Disparagement. Subject to Section 6.13, Executive agrees not to make, directly or indirectly, whether orally or in writing, any public disparaging statement concerning the Company (or its principals, officers, directors, partners, managers, members, employees or customers) that could foreseeably harm the reputation or goodwill of the Company. The Company agrees that it will instruct its senior executive officers (including its Chief Executive Officer) and the members of the Board not to make, directly or indirectly, whether orally or in writing, any public disparaging statement concerning Executive that could foreseeably harm the reputation or goodwill of Executive. Nothing herein shall be deemed to preclude Executive or any individual affiliated with the Company from testifying truthfully under oath if required or compelled by law to testify in any judicial action or before any government authority or agency or from making any other legally required truthful statements or disclosures. |
6.13 |
Permitted and Protected Disclosures. Nothing contained in this Agreement limits Executive’s ability to file a charge or complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the National Labor Relations Board, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Securities and Exchange Commission or any other federal, state or local governmental agency or commission (“Government Agencies”). Executive further recognizes that this Agreement does not limit Executive’s ability to communicate with any Government Agencies or otherwise participate in any investigation or proceeding that may be conducted by any Government Agency, including providing documents or other information, without notice to the Company. This Agreement does not limit Executive’s right to receive an award for information provided to any Government Agencies. |
7. |
Cooperation. |
Executive agrees that he will cooperate (i) with the Company, at reasonable and mutually-convenient times, in the defense of any legal claim involving any matter that arose during Executive’s employment with the Company about which Executive has knowledge, and (ii) with all government authorities on matters pertaining to any investigation, litigation or administrative
Matthew Kapusta |
9 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
proceeding concerning the Company. The Company will reimburse Executive for any reasonable travel and out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Executive in providing such cooperation.
8. |
Conflicting Agreements. |
Executive acknowledges and represents that by executing this Agreement and performing his obligations under it, he will not breach or be in conflict with any other agreement to which he is a party or is bound, and that he is not subject to any covenants against competition or similar covenants that would affect the performance of his obligations for the Company.
9. |
Termination. |
9.1 |
Events of Termination. This Agreement, the Term, Executive’s Base Salary and any and all other rights of Executive under this Agreement or otherwise as an employee of the Company will terminate: |
(a) |
upon the death of Executive; |
(b) |
upon the Disability of Executive immediately upon notice from either party to the other; |
(c) |
upon termination by the Company for Cause; |
(d) |
upon the voluntary resignation of employment by Executive without Good Reason; |
(e) |
upon termination by the Company for any reason other than those set forth in Section 9.1(a) through 9.1(c) above; |
(f) |
upon voluntary resignation of employment by Executive for Good Reason; or |
(g) |
upon a Change in Control Termination as described in Section 9.7 below. |
Except as specifically set forth in Section 9.6, in the event Executive’s termination occurs pursuant to subsections (a) - (d) above, Executive will be entitled only to the Accrued Benefits through the date of the termination of Executive’s employment (the “Termination Date”). The Company will have no further obligation to pay any compensation of any kind (including, without limitation, any bonus or portion of a bonus that otherwise may have become due and payable to Executive with respect to the year in which such Termination Date occurs), or severance payment of any kind, unless otherwise provided herein.
9.2 |
Definition of Accrued Benefits. For purposes of this Agreement; “Accrued Benefits” shall mean (i) payment of Base Salary through the Termination Date, (ii) any payments or benefits under the Company’s benefit plans that are vested, earned, or accrued prior to the Termination Date according to the terms applicable to such benefit plans (including but not limited to payment for accrued but unused vacation); (iii) payment of unreimbursed business expenses incurred by Executive; and (iv) rights to indemnification and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance coverage as provided for herein, under any other agreements between the Company and Executive, in any insurance policy providing for such coverage or permitting such coverage and/or under any of the Company’s organizing documents or the organizing documents of any of the Company’s parents, subsidiaries or affiliated entities as applicable. |
Matthew Kapusta |
10 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
9.3 |
Definition of Disability. For purposes hereof, the term “Disability” shall mean an incapacity by accident, illness or other circumstances that renders Executive mentally or physically incapable of performing the essential duties and services required of Executive hereunder on a full-time basis for a period of at least one hundred twenty (120) consecutive days, with or without reasonable accommodation. |
9.4 |
Definition of Cause. As used in this Agreement, “Cause” shall mean the good faith determination by the Company (which determination shall be conclusive), on written notice from the Board to Executive that one or more of the following events has occurred and stating with reasonable specificity the actions that constitute Cause and the specific reasonable cure (related to sections (a) and (h) below): |
(a) |
Executive has willfully or repeatedly failed to perform his material duties in his capacity as CEO of uniQure, Inc. or as a Statutory Director of uniQure, N.V., and such failure has not been cured after a period of thirty (30) days’ notice; |
(b) |
any reckless or grossly negligent act by Executive having the foreseeable effect of injuring the interest, business or reputation of the Company, or any of its parent, subsidiaries or affiliates in any material respect and that did in fact cause such material injury; |
(c) |
Executive’s evidenced use of any illegal drug, or illegal narcotic, or excessive amounts of alcohol (as determined by the Company in its reasonable discretion) on Company property or at a function where Executive is working on behalf of the Company; |
(d) |
the indictment on charges or conviction for (or the procedural equivalent or conviction for), or entering of a guilty plea or plea of no contest with respect to a felony; |
(e) |
the conviction for (or the procedural equivalent or conviction for), or entering of a guilty plea or plea of no contest with respect to a misdemeanor that, in the Board’s reasonable judgment, involves moral turpitude deceit, dishonesty or fraud; provided that in the event that Executive is indicted on charges for a misdemeanor described in this subsection 9.4(e), the Board may elect, in its sole discretion, to place Executive on administrative garden leave with continuation of full compensation and benefits under this Agreement during the pendency of the proceedings; |
(f) |
conduct by or at the direction of Executive constituting misappropriation or embezzlement of the property of the Company, or any of its parents or affiliates (other than the occasional, customary and de minimis use of Company property for personal purposes); |
(g) |
a material breach by Executive of a fiduciary duty owing to the Company, including the misappropriation of (or attempted misappropriation of) a corporate opportunity or undisclosed self-dealing; |
(h) |
a material breach by Executive of any material provision of this Agreement or any of the Company’s written employment policies, which breach, if curable, remains uncured for a period of thirty (30) days after receipt by Executive of written notice |
Matthew Kapusta |
11 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
of such breach from the Board, which notice shall contain a reasonably specific description of such breach and the specific reasonable cure requested by the Board; and
(i) |
any material breach of Section 6 of this Agreement by Executive. |
The definition of Cause set forth in this Agreement shall govern for purposes of Executive’s equity compensation and any other compensation containing such a concept.
9.5 |
Definition of Good Reason. As used in this Agreement, “Good Reason” shall mean that Executive has complied with the Good Reason Process (hereinafter defined) following the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) a material diminution in Executive’s responsibilities, authority or duties (excluding any board duties associated with any position that Executive may hold at uniQure N.V.); (ii) a diminution in Executive’s Base Salary, except for across-the-board salary reductions, based on the Company’s financial performance, similarly affecting the CEO and all or substantially all other senior management employees of the Company, which reduction does not reduce Executive’s Base Salary (in the aggregate with any similar reductions during the Term) by more than 20% from Executive’s highest Base Salary; (iii) a material change in the geographic location at which Executive provides services to the Company (i.e., outside a radius of fifty (50) miles from Boston, Massachusetts); (iv) the material breach of this Agreement by the Company; or (v) Executive ceasing to serve as CEO or as a member of the Board (except due to changes in Board composition required by applicable law or listing standards) (each a “Good Reason Condition”). “Good Reason Process” shall mean that (a) Executive reasonably determines in good faith that a Good Reason Condition has occurred; (b) Executive notifies the Board in writing of the first occurrence of the Good Reason Condition within sixty (60) days of the first occurrence of such condition; (c) Executive cooperates in good faith with the Company’s efforts, for a period not less than thirty (30) days following such notice (the “Cure Period”), to remedy the Good Reason Condition; (d) notwithstanding such efforts, the Good Reason Condition continues to exist; and (e) Executive terminates Executive’s employment within sixty (60) days after the end of the Cure Period. If the Company cures the Good Reason Condition during the Cure Period, Good Reason shall be deemed not to have occurred. |
9.6 |
Separation Benefits. |
(a) |
Should Executive experience a termination of employment during the Term pursuant to Section 9.1(a) or Section 9.1(b) above, in addition to the Accrued Benefits, Executive shall also be entitled to receive payment of any Bonus for performance periods completed prior to the Termination Date, a lump sum Bonus for the year in which the Termination Date occurs as set forth in and subject to Section 4.3 to be paid no later than March 15 following the end of the fiscal year in which the termination occurs. |
(b) |
Should Executive experience a termination of employment during the Term pursuant to Section 9.1(e) or Section 9.1(f) above, then, in addition to the Accrued Benefits, Executive shall be entitled to the following payments and benefits: |
(1) |
Continued payment of Executive’s then-current Base Salary rate (less necessary withholdings and authorized deductions), payable pursuant to the Company’s regular payroll practices in effect at the time, for the |
Matthew Kapusta |
12 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
eighteen (18) month period following the Termination Date; provided that such Base Salary payments shall commence within sixty (60) days after the Termination Date and the first payment shall include all amounts otherwise payable to Executive pursuant to the Company’s regular payroll practices between the Termination Date and the first payment date. Solely for purposes of Section 409A (“Section 409A”) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), each installment payment will be considered a separate payment.
(2) |
Provided that Executive and his eligible dependents, if any, are participating in the Company’s group health, dental and vision plans on the Termination Date and elect on a timely basis to continue that participation in some or all of the offered plans through the federal law commonly known as “COBRA,” the Company will pay or reimburse Executive for Executive’s full COBRA premiums (i.e., employer and employee portion) until the earlier to occur of (a) the eighteen (18) month anniversary of the Termination Date; (b) the date Executive becomes eligible to enroll in the health, dental and/or vision plans of another employer; (c) the date Executive (and/or his eligible dependents, as applicable) is no longer eligible for COBRA coverage; or (d) the Company in good faith determines that payments under this Section 9.6(b)(2) would result in a discriminatory health plan pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended, and any guidance or regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, “PPACA”) (such benefit, the “Continuation Health Benefit”). Executive agrees to notify the Company promptly if he becomes eligible to enroll in the plans of another employer or if he or any of his dependents cease to be eligible to continue participation in the Company’s plans through COBRA. For the avoidance of doubt, if the Company’s payment of a portion of the Executive’s COBRA continuation coverage will be considered discriminatory under the PPACA, the Company shall not pay for or reimburse any portion of the Executive’s COBRA continuation coverage upon his termination of employment. The COBRA premium payments or reimbursements shall commence within sixty (60) days after the Termination Date and the first payment shall include all amounts otherwise payable to Executive between the Termination Date and the first payment date. |
(3) |
Payment of any Bonus for performance periods completed prior to the Termination Date, plus a lump sum Pro-rata Bonus as set forth in and subject to Section 4.3 to be paid following the last day of the fiscal year in which the Termination Date occurs, no later than two and one-half (2.5) months following the last day of such fiscal year. |
(4) |
A lump sum payment equal to the annual target Bonus in effect on the Termination Date multiplied by one-and-a-half (1.5), such payment to be paid no later than sixty (60) days after the Termination Date. |
(5) |
Accelerated vesting of any and all options or restricted share unit awards, which remain unvested as of the Termination Date; and accelerated vesting of any and all performance share unit awards to the extent then earned (or deemed, in the reasonable discretion of the Board, to have been |
Matthew Kapusta |
13 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
achieved or reasonably expected to be achieved within the performance period), which remain unvested as of the Termination Date.
(c) |
Should Executive experience a termination of employment during the Term pursuant to Section 9.1(g) above, then, in addition to the Accrued Benefits, Executive shall be entitled to: |
(1) |
a lump sum payment equal to two (2) times Executive’s then-current Base Salary (less necessary withholdings and authorized deductions) to be paid no later than sixty (60) days after the Termination Date; provided that, for the avoidance of doubt, in the event that the applicable Change in Control does not constitute a “change in control event” for purposes of Section 409A or otherwise required by Section 409A, such amount shall instead be paid in installments in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll practices, if and to the extent required by Section 409A; |
(2) |
the Continuation Health Benefit as set out in Section 9.6(b)(2); |
(3) |
payment of any Bonus for performance periods completed prior to the Termination Date, plus a Bonus paid at the target in effect for the year of termination, prorated in relation to the Termination Date, to be paid no later than sixty (60) days after the Termination Date; |
(4) |
a lump sum representing two (2) times Executive’s target Bonus in effect for the year of termination to be paid no later than sixty (60) days after the Termination Date; and |
(5) |
accelerated vesting of any and all equity awards that remain unvested as of the Termination Date consistent with Section 9.6(b)(5). |
Executive’s entitlement to the payments or other benefits in Section 9.6(c) is conditional upon Executive’s continued performance of his duties and responsibilities throughout the process preceding the Change in Control event until the latter of the closing date for the transaction causing the Change in Control event or the Termination Date.
9.7 |
Termination as a Result of a Change in Control. |
(a) |
For purposes of this Agreement, “Change in Control Termination” shall mean any of the following: |
(1) |
Any termination by the Company of Executive’s employment, other than for Cause (as defined in Section 9.4 above), that occurs within the period that starts ninety (90) days preceding the Change in Control and ends on the one (1) year anniversary of the Change in Control; or |
(2) |
Any resignation by Executive for Good Reason (as defined in Section 9.5 above), that occurs within the period that starts ninety (90) days preceding the Change in Control and ends on the one (1) year anniversary of the Change in Control. |
Matthew Kapusta |
14 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
(b) |
For purposes of this Agreement, “Change in Control” shall mean any of the following: |
(1) |
any “person,” as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”) (other than the Company, any of its subsidiaries, or any trustee, fiduciary or other person or entity holding securities under any employee benefit plan or trust of the Company or any of its subsidiaries), together with all “affiliates” and “associates” (as such terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Act) of such person, shall become the “beneficial owner” (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing forty (40) percent or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then-outstanding securities having the right to vote in an election of the Board (in such case other than as a result of an acquisition of securities directly from the Company); or |
(2) |
the date a majority of the members of the Board is replaced during any twelve (12) month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board before the date of the appointment or election; or |
(3) |
the consummation of (A) any consolidation or merger of the Company where the stockholders of the Company, immediately prior to the consolidation or merger, would not, immediately after the consolidation or merger, beneficially own (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Act), directly or indirectly, shares representing in the aggregate more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting shares of the Company issuing cash or securities in the consolidation or merger (or of its ultimate parent corporation, if any), or (B) any sale or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of transactions contemplated or arranged by any party as a single plan) of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company. |
(c) |
Section 280G Limitation. |
Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, in the event that the amount of any compensation, payment or distribution by the Company to or for the benefit of Executive, whether paid or payable or distributed or distributable pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or otherwise, calculated in a manner consistent with Section 280G of the Code and the applicable regulations thereunder (the “Severance Payments”), would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, the following provisions shall apply:
(1) |
If the Severance Payments, reduced by the sum of (1) the Excise Tax and (2) the total of the Federal, state, and local income and employment taxes payable by Executive on the amount of the Severance Payments which are in excess of the Threshold Amount, are greater than or equal to the Threshold Amount, Executive shall be entitled to the full benefits payable under this Agreement. |
(2) |
If the Threshold Amount is less than (x) the Severance Payments, but greater than (y) the Severance Payments reduced by the sum of (1) the |
Matthew Kapusta |
15 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
Excise Tax and (2) the total of the Federal, state, and local income and employment taxes on the amount of the Severance Payments which are in excess of the Threshold Amount, then the Severance Payments shall be reduced (but not below zero) to the extent necessary so that the sum of all Severance Payments shall not exceed the Threshold Amount. In such event, the Severance Payments shall be reduced in the following order: (1) cash payments not subject to Section 409A; (2) cash payments subject to Section 409A; (3) equity-based payments and acceleration; and (4) non-cash forms of benefits. To the extent any payment is to be made over time (e.g., in installments, etc.), then the payments shall be reduced in reverse chronological order.
(3) |
For the purposes of this Section 9.7(c), “Threshold Amount” shall mean three times Executive’s “base amount” within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(3) of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder less one dollar ($1.00); and “Excise Tax” shall mean the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, and any interest or penalties incurred by Executive with respect to such excise tax. |
(4) |
The determination as to which of the alternative provisions of Section 9.7(c) shall apply to Executive shall be made by a nationally recognized accounting firm selected by the Company (the “Accounting Firm”), which shall provide detailed supporting calculations both to the Company and Executive within fifteen (15) business days of the earlier of (x) the effective date of the applicable “change in ownership or effective control of the corporation” or “change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the corporation” within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(2)(a)(i) of the Code, (y) the Termination Date, if applicable, or (z) at such earlier date as is reasonably requested by the Company or Executive. For purposes of determining which of the alternative provisions of Section 9.7(c) shall apply, Executive shall be deemed to pay federal income taxes at the highest marginal rate of federal income taxation applicable to individuals for the calendar year in which the determination is to be made, and state and local income taxes at the highest marginal rates of individual taxation in the state and locality of Executive’s residence on the Termination Date, net of the maximum reduction in federal income taxes which could be obtained from deduction of such state and local taxes. Any determination by the Accounting Firm shall be binding upon the Company and Executive. |
9.8 |
General Release of Claims. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement, all severance payments and benefits described in Section 9.6 of this Agreement (except for payment of the Accrued Benefits) are conditioned upon the execution, delivery to the Company, and expiration of any applicable revocation period without a notice of revocation having been given by Executive, all by the sixtieth (60th) day following the Termination Date, of a General Release of Claims (which shall include the restrictive covenants set forth in Section 6) by and between Executive (or Executive’s estate) and the Company in the form attached as Exhibit B to this Agreement. In the event of Executive’s death or incapacity due to Disability, the form attached as Exhibit B will be revised for signature accordingly. Provided any applicable timing requirements set forth above have been met, the payments and benefits pursuant to Sections 9.6 will be paid (or begin to be |
Matthew Kapusta |
16 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
paid) to Executive as soon as administratively practicable but no later than fifteen (15) days following the date Executive signs and delivers the General Release to the Company and any applicable revocation period has expired without a notice of revocation having been given, provided that if the sixty (60) day period referred to in the preceding sentence begins in one taxable year and ends in a second taxable year such payments or benefits shall not commence until the second taxable year. The first payment shall include all amounts that would have otherwise been paid to Executive in accordance with the Company’s payroll practices during the period beginning on the Termination Date and ending on the first payment date.
10. |
In the Event of Termination for Any Reason. |
10.1 |
Right to Offset. The Company may offset any undisputed amounts Executive owes the Company or its affiliates at the time of his termination of employment (including any payment of Accrued Benefits, separation pay, Pro-rata Bonus or Continuation Health Benefit reimbursements), except for secured or unsecured loans, against any amounts the Company owes Executive hereunder, to the extent permitted by Section 409A. |
10.2 |
Resignation from all Positions. If Executive’s employment with the Company ends for any reason, he shall voluntarily and immediately resign from any and all positions that he holds as an officer, director, or committee member with respect to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates. In particular, Executive shall immediately tender his resignation from his position as member of the Board of uniQure N.V. Executive will no longer perform any services and have no authority within the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates. |
10.3 |
Return of Company Property and Proprietary Information; Non-Deletion of Company Data. Upon termination of Executive’s employment with the Company, or at any other time upon the request of Company, Executive shall forthwith deliver to Company any and all documents, notes, notebooks, letters, manuals, prints, drawings, block diagrams, photocopies of documents, devices, equipment, keys, security passes, credit cards, hardware, data, databases, source code, object code, and data or computer programming code stored on an optical or electronic medium, and any copies thereof, in the possession of or under the control of Executive that embodies any confidential information of the Company. Executive agrees to refrain from intentionally purging or deleting data from any Company-owned equipment, including email systems, in connection with Executive’s termination. To the extent that Executive possesses any data belonging to Company on any storage media owned by Executive (for example, a home computer’s hard disk drive, portable data storage device, etc.), Executive agrees that he will work cooperatively with the Company to return such data and ensure it is removed from Executive’s devices in a manner that does not adversely impact any personal data. Executive agrees not to take any steps to delete any Company data from any device without first obtaining Company’s written approval. Executive agrees to cooperate with Company if Company requests written or other positive confirmation of the return or destruction of such data from any personal storage media. Nothing herein shall be deemed to prohibit Executive from retaining (and making copies of): (i) Executive’s personal non-business-related correspondence files; (ii) documents relating to Executive’s personal compensation, benefits, and obligations; and (iii) Executive’s “rolodex” whether in tangible or in electronic form (e.g., electronic contacts file), provided such contacts do not constitute a trade secret of the Company. |
Matthew Kapusta |
17 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
11. |
Compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. |
The parties intend that this Agreement and the payments and benefits provided hereunder be exempt from the application of Section 409A, and the rules and regulations issued thereunder, to the maximum extent possible, whether pursuant to the short-term deferral exception described in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(4), the involuntary separation pay plan exception described in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(9)(iii), or otherwise. To the extent Section 409A is applicable to this Agreement, the parties intend that this Agreement and any payments and benefits hereunder comply with the deferral, payout and other limitations and restrictions imposed under Section 409A so as to avoid the imputation of any tax, penalties, accelerated taxation or interest under Section 409A. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Agreement shall be construed, interpreted, operated and administered in a manner consistent with such intentions. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, and notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary:
(a) |
If (i) Executive is a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section 409A upon his Termination Date, and (ii) some or any portion of the amounts payable to Executive in connection with his separation from service constitute deferred compensation under Section 409A (the “Deferred Compensation Separation Benefits”) and would result in the imposition of the penalty tax under Section 409A if paid to Executive on or within the six (6) month period following the Termination Date, then to the extent such portion of the Deferred Compensation Separation Benefits resulting in the imposition of additional tax would otherwise have been payable on or within the first six (6) months following the Termination Date, it will instead become payable on the first payroll date that occurs on or after the date six (6) months and one (1) day following the Termination Date (or such longer period as is required to avoid the imposition of additional tax under Section 409A). If any such delayed cash payment is otherwise payable on an installment basis, the first payment shall include a catch-up payment covering amounts that would otherwise have been paid during the six-month period but for the application of this provision, and the balance of the installments shall be payable in accordance with their original schedule. All subsequent Deferred Compensation Separation Benefits, if any, will be payable in accordance with the payment schedule applicable to each payment or benefit. |
(b) |
The Company’s obligation to make any reimbursements or provide in-kind benefits to Executive will be consistent with the requirements of Section 409A, including the following restrictions: (1) the expenses paid or reimbursed by the Company in one calendar year will not affect the expenses paid or reimbursed in another calendar year; and (2) reimbursement for any expenses will be made within a reasonable period of time following the date on which the Company receives written documentation of the expense, provided that all expenses will be reimbursed on or before the last day of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the expense was incurred. |
12. |
Indemnification; Directors and Officers Liability Insurance. |
12.1 |
The Company will defend, indemnify and hold harmless Executive to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, if Executive is a party or threatened to be made a party to any Proceeding (other than Proceedings brought by the Company against Executive for claims other than shareholder derivative actions) where the Proceeding (i) is brought against |
Matthew Kapusta |
18 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
Executive by reason of the fact that Executive is or was an employee of the Company; and (ii) involves conduct (or alleged conduct) by Executive that was taken in the scope of Executive’s employment with the Company; provided that Executive acted in good faith and in a manner which Executive reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company; and further provided that, in the case of any criminal action or Proceeding, Executive had reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was lawful (a Proceeding which satisfies the requirements of this sentence, a “Covered Proceeding”). For purposes of this provision, “Proceeding” means any threatened or pending claim, action, suit, arbitration, alternative dispute resolution process, investigation, administrative hearing, appeal, or any other similar proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, arbitrative or investigative, whether formal or informal. For the avoidance of doubt, the Company’s obligation to indemnify Executive applies irrespective of whether Executive is named as the sole defendant in a Proceeding, a co-defendant with the Company in a Proceeding, a co-defendant with other individuals or entities in a Proceeding or as a member of a group of individuals/entities named as a defendant in a Proceeding (e.g., “John Does 1-10”, “Officers of…” or “the Board of...”).
12.2 |
The Company will advance legal fees and other expenses incurred by or on behalf of the indemnified Executive in connection with any Covered Proceeding. By accepting such advancement of legal fees and expenses, Executive is agreeing to repay any and all such legal fees and expenses in the event it is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that applicable law prohibits the Company from paying such fees and expenses on behalf of Executive. |
12.3 |
The Company acknowledges and agrees that Executive’s actions taken in reliance on the advice of counsel shall presumptively be deemed to have been taken in good faith and consistent with the best interests of the Company. |
12.4 |
The Company shall maintain directors and officers liability insurance coverage for the benefit of Executive with a commercially reasonable policy limit as well as a commercially reasonable tail policy for the benefit of Executive following the end of the Term. |
13. |
Applicable Clawback and Other Company Policies. |
All amounts payable under this Agreement are subject to the terms of any applicable Clawback Policy and, to the extent permitted by applicable law, including without limitation Section 409A of the Code, all amounts payable under this Agreement are subject to offset in the event that Executive has an outstanding clawback, recoupment or forfeiture obligation to the Company under the terms of any applicable Clawback Policy. For the purposes of this Agreement, “Clawback Policy” means any clawback, recoupment or forfeiture provisions of any applicable clawback, recoupment or forfeiture policy (including, without limitation, a clawback policy required to be implemented by an applicable stock exchange) approved by the Board (or a committee thereof), as in effect from time to time, whether approved before or after the effective date of this Agreement. Executive acknowledges and agrees that Executive will be bound by the terms of any such Clawback Policy as if it were set forth in this Agreement.
14. |
Miscellaneous. |
14.1 |
Successors and Assigns. Executive may not assign this Agreement, by operation of law or otherwise, without the Company’s prior written consent. Without the Company’s consent, any attempted transfer or assignment will be void and of no effect. The Company may |
Matthew Kapusta |
19 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
assign its rights under this Agreement if the Company consolidates with or merges into any other entity, or transfers substantially all of its properties or assets to any other entity, provided that such entity expressly agrees to be bound by the provisions hereof. This Agreement will inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Company and Executive, their respective successors, executors, administrators, heirs, and permitted assigns.
14.2 |
Enforceability. If any portion or provision of the Agreement is declared illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Agreement will not be affected, and each remaining portion and provision of this Agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. |
14.3 |
Waiver. No waiver of any provision will be effective unless made in writing and signed by the waiving party. The failure of any party to require the performance of any term or obligation of this Agreement does not prevent subsequent enforcement of that term or obligation. The waiver by any party of any breach of this Agreement does not waive any subsequent breach. |
14.4 |
Notices. Any notices, requests, demands, and other communications described in this Agreement are sufficient if in writing and delivered in person or sent postage prepaid, by certified or registered U.S. mail or by FedEx/UPS to Executive at his last known home address and a copy by e-mail to Executive, or in the case of the Company or the Board, to the attention of the Chairman of the Board at the main office of uniQure, N.V., with a copy by e-mail to the Chairman of the Board. Any notice sent by U.S. mail shall be deemed given for all purposes seventy-two (72) hours from its deposit in the U.S. mail, or the next day if sent by overnight delivery. |
14.5 |
Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are independent of and separable from each other, and no provision shall be affected or rendered invalid or unenforceable by virtue of the fact that for any reason any other provision or provisions may be invalid or unenforceable in whole or in part. |
14.6 |
Amendment. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by a written instrument signed by Executive and by a duly authorized representative of the Company. |
14.7 |
Governing Law. This is a Massachusetts contract and will be construed under and be governed in all respects by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts without regard to its choice-of-law principles and shall be deemed to have been made in Massachusetts. |
14.8 |
Consent to Exclusive Jurisdiction/Venue. The parties hereby consent and submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal and state courts in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and to exclusive venue in any Massachusetts federal court and/or Massachusetts state court located in Suffolk County, for any dispute arising from this Agreement. |
14.9 |
Section Headings. The section headings in this Agreement are for convenience only, form no part of this Agreement and shall not affect its interpretation. |
14.10 |
Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement may be executed by facsimile transmission, PDF, electronic |
Matthew Kapusta |
20 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
signature or other similar electronic means with the same force and effect as if such signature page were an original thereof.
14.11 |
Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with the Company’s plan or policy documents and governing policies of the Company (each as amended from time to time), constitute the entire understanding relating to the matters addressed in this Agreement and supersede any other prior agreement, whether written or oral, including the Prior Employment Agreement. |
[This space intentionally left blank.]
Matthew Kapusta |
21 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
I HAVE HAD A REASONABLE PERIOD OF AT LEAST TEN (10) BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE THIS AGREEMENT BECOMES EFFECTIVE TO STUDY, UNDERSTAND AND CONSIDER THIS AGREEMENT. IN SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT I ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT I HAVE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO CONSULT WITH COUNSEL OF MY CHOICE AND THAT I HAVE READ THIS AGREEMENT AND UNDERSTAND ALL OF ITS TERMS. I AM SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT KNOWINGLY AND VOLUNTARILY. I AM NOT RELYING UPON ANY STATEMENTS BY THE COMPANY OR ITS REPRESENTATIVES.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement under seal as of April 15, 2025.
|
|
EXECUTIVE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Matthew Craig Kapusta |
|||
Name: Matthew Craig Kapusta |
|||
|
|
|
|
ACCEPTED AND AGREED: |
|||
uniQure, Inc. |
|||
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Jeannette Potts |
||
Jeannette Potts |
|||
|
Chief Legal Officer |
|
|
ACCEPTED AND AGREED: |
||
uniQure, N.V. |
By: |
/s/ Christian Klemt |
||
Christian Klemt |
|||
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Matthew Kapusta |
22 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
EXHIBIT A
LIST OF EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENTS
(if none, please write the word “none” and sign below)
NONE
/s/ Matthew C. Kapusta |
||
Signature: |
||
Matthew C. Kapusta |
||
Name of Executive |
Date: |
April 15, 2025 |
Matthew Kapusta |
23 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
EXHIBIT B
GENERAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS AND POST-TERMINATION RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AGREEMENT
In exchange for the promises and benefits set forth in Section 9 of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between uniQure, Inc. and Matthew Craig Kapusta made as of April 15, 2025, and to be provided to me following the Effective Date of this General Release of Claims and Post-Termination Restrictive Covenants Agreement (“Post-Termination Release Agreement”), I, Matthew Craig Kapusta, on behalf of myself, my heirs, executors and assigns, hereby acknowledge, understand and agree as follows:
1.On behalf of myself and my family, heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives, agents, employees, assigns, legal representatives, accountants, affiliates and for any partnerships, corporations, sole proprietorships, or other entities owned or controlled by me, I fully release, acquit, and forever discharge uniQure, Inc., its past, present and future officers, directors, shareholders, agents, representatives, insurers, employees, attorneys, subsidiaries, affiliated corporations, parents, and assigns (collectively, the “Releasees”), from any and all charges, actions, causes of action, claims, grievances, damages, obligations, suits, agreements, costs, expenses, attorneys’ fees, or any other liability of any kind whatsoever, suspected or unsuspected, known or unknown, which have or could have arisen out of my employment with or services performed for Releasees and/or termination of my employment with or termination of my services performed for Releasees (collectively, “Claims”), including:
a. |
Claims arising under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (as amended); the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1991; the Americans With Disabilities Act; the Family and Medical Leave Act; the Employee Retirement Income Security Act; the Occupational Health and Safety Act; the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; the Massachusetts Law Against Discrimination (M.G.L. c. 151B et seq.), and/or any other laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts related to employment or the separation from employment; |
b. |
Claims for age discrimination arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (as amended) (“ADEA”) and the Older Workers Benefits Protection Act (“OWBPA”), except ADEA claims that may arise after the execution of this Post-Termination Release Agreement; |
c. |
Claims arising out of any other federal, state, local or municipal statute, law, constitution, ordinance, or regulation; and/or |
d. |
Any other employment-related claim whatsoever, whether in contract, tort, or any other legal theory, arising out of or relating to my employment with uniQure, Inc. and/or my separation of employment from the Releasees. |
e. |
Excluded from this Post-Termination Release Agreement are any claims that cannot be released or waived by law. This includes, but is not limited to, my right to file a charge with or participate in an investigation conducted by certain government agencies, such as the EEOC or NLRB. I acknowledge and agree, however, that I am releasing and waiving my right to any monetary recovery should any government agency pursue any claims on my behalf that arose prior to the Effective Date of this Post-Termination Release Agreement. |
Matthew Kapusta |
24 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
f. |
I waive all rights to re-employment with the Releasees. If I do apply for employment with the Releasees, the Releasees and I agree that the Releasees need not employ me, and that if the Releasees decline to employ me for any reason, it shall not be liable to me for any cause of action or damages whatsoever. |
2.Release of Other Claims. I fully release, acquit, and forever discharge the Releasees from any and all other charges, actions, causes of action, claims, grievances, damages, obligations, suits, agreements, costs, expenses, attorneys’ fees or any other liability of any kind whatsoever related to my employment, my employment agreement, my termination or the business of uniQure, Inc. of which I have knowledge as of the time I sign this Post-Termination Release Agreement.
3.I further acknowledge that I have received payment, salary, and wages in full for all services rendered in conjunction with my employment with uniQure, Inc., including payment for all wages, bonuses, and accrued, unused paid time off, and that no other compensation is owed to me except as provided herein. I specifically understand that this Post-Termination Release Agreement includes, without limitation, a release of claims for alleged wages due, overtime or other compensation or payment including any claim for treble damages, attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to the Massachusetts Wage Act and State Overtime Law M.G.L. c. 149, §§148, 150 et seq. and M.G.L. c. 151, §IA et seq. and I further acknowledge that I am unaware of any facts that would support a claim against the Releasees for violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act or the Massachusetts Wage Act.
4.Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, nothing in this Post-Termination Release Agreement shall be deemed to release any of the Releasees for (i) any claim for any of the Accrued Benefits under the Employment Agreement; (ii) any claim for any separation benefit under Section 9 of the Employment Agreement including, without limitation, separation pay, continuation of health benefits, Pro-rata Bonus, and accelerated vesting of equity incentive awards (as applicable and as defined in the Employment Agreement or any other related agreements); or (iii) any rights to indemnification or coverage under a directors and officers liability insurance policy. I acknowledge that nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit or restrict me from initiating communications directly with, responding to any inquiry from, providing testimony before, providing confidential information to, reporting possible violations of law or regulation to, or filing a claim or assisting with an investigation directly with a self-regulatory authority or a government agency or entity, including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Department of Labor, the National Labor Relations Board, the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Congress, any agency Inspector General or any other federal, state or local regulatory authority (collectively, the “Regulators”), or from making other disclosures that are protected under the whistleblower provisions of state or federal law or regulation. I further acknowledge that I do not need the prior authorization of uniQure, Inc. to engage in conduct protected by this subsection, and I do not need to notify uniQure, Inc. that I have engaged in such conduct. This Agreement does not limit my right to receive an award from any Regulator that provides awards for providing information relating to a potential violation of the law. I further acknowledge that federal law provides criminal and civil immunity to federal and state claims for trade secret misappropriation to individuals who disclose trade secrets to their attorneys, courts, or government officials in certain confidential circumstances that are set forth at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1833(b)(1) and 1833(b)(2), related to the reporting or investigation of a suspected violation of the law, or in connection with a lawsuit for retaliation for reporting a suspected violation of the law.
Matthew Kapusta |
25 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
5.Restrictive Covenants.
a. |
Non-Competition |
(1) |
For the purposes of this Section: |
“Competing Services” means any product, process, therapy or service of any person or organization other than the Company that is in development or has been commercialized and that involves a gene therapy: (i) for the treatment of any disease for which the Company had a product or therapy on the market or in any phase of development during the term last two (2) years of Executive’s employment with the Company, including, without limitation, any such products in the field of cardiovascular, central nervous system, liver or metabolic disease; or (ii) that otherwise is or would be directly competitive with the Company for the treatment of the same disease or patients.
“Competing Organization” means any person, entity, or organization, including Executive, engaged in, or that intends to become engaged in, the providing or the production of Competing Services.
“Customer” shall mean any individual or entity with which the Company has contracted to perform work, provide products or render service.
“Prospective Customer” shall mean any individual or entity that, during the twenty-four (24) months prior to termination of Executive’s employment, the Company has solicited with an in-person meeting or through a written proposal to become a Customer of the Company.
“Prohibited Activities” means any specific types of services performed by the Executive for the Company at any time during the two (2) years preceding the termination of employment.
I agree that for a period of twelve (12) months after the Termination Date (the “Non-Competition Period”), I shall not directly or indirectly, perform Prohibited Activities (whether as an employee, consultant, independent contractor, member of a board of directors, or in any other capacity) to a Competing Organization. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall prevent me from becoming employed by or otherwise rendering services to a Competing Organization whose business is diversified, if the scope of my services to such Competing Organization is limited to identifiable parts, segments, entities or business units of such business that are not engaged in providing or producing Competing Services (“Non-Prohibited Activities”); provided that I agree that if I seek to become employed or otherwise render services (that are Non-Prohibited Activities) to such a Competing Organization during the Non-Competition Period, prior to my employment or rendering such services, (i) I shall provide uniQure, Inc. with written assurance from such Competing Organization and from me that I will not render Prohibited Activities directly or indirectly in connection with any Competing Services, and (ii) I receive written approval of my intended employment or rendering such Non-
Matthew Kapusta |
26 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
Prohibited Activities (such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld and shall be provided by uniQure, Inc. within ten (10) days from receipt of the written assurances set forth in subsection (i)).
(2) |
During the Non-Competition Period, I agree to disclose this Post-Termination Release Agreement to every subsequent employer by which I may subsequently be employed or otherwise engaged in exchange for compensation. |
(3) |
I agree that the temporal restrictions set forth in this Section 5 are fair and are reasonably required for the protection of uniQure, Inc.’s legitimate business interests in light of my substantial role as an employee of uniQure, Inc., which includes receipt of trade secrets, know-how, confidential and propriety information, and specialized training, among other things. I additionally agree that the lack of geographic scope on the obligations set forth in this Section 5 is both appropriate and reasonable in light of the fact that uniQure, Inc. competes for business in a variety of regions and markets throughout the world. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event a court of competent jurisdiction disagrees with the parties’ assessment, then the geographic scope shall at minimum include all markets in which my work had a material presence or influence within the last two (2) years of my employment with uniQure, Inc. which for purposes of clarity shall include, but may not be limited to, the United States and European Union markets. |
(4) |
I hereby acknowledge and agree that I have had no fewer than ten (10) business days from receipt of this Post-Termination Release Agreement to consult with counsel of my choosing before agreeing to the restrictions in this Section by executing this Post-Termination Release Agreement below, and if I have executed this Post-Termination Release Agreement before such time period has elapsed, I have done so by my own choosing |
(5) |
If it is later determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that injunctive relief is warranted to prevent me from engaging in certain conduct, then the restrictive periods shall be tolled for the lesser of the period of time that I am determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to have had already been engaging in the prohibited conduct prior to the injunction and the maximum period allowed by law. uniQure, Inc. and I intend that uniQure, Inc. shall be entitled to full restrictive periods of post-employment conduct that does not breach or threaten to breach this Post-Termination Release Agreement. |
(6) |
I acknowledge that a breach of this Post-Termination Release Agreement will cause irreparable injury to uniQure, Inc., that uniQure, Inc.’s remedies at law will be inadequate in case of any such breach or threatened breach, and that uniQure, Inc. will be entitled to the remedy of specific performance and/or preliminary injunctive relief, without bond, and other injunctive relief, in case of any such breach or threatened breach. |
(7) |
The waiver by uniQure, Inc. or me of any action, right or condition in this Post-Termination Release Agreement, or of any breach of a provision of |
Matthew Kapusta |
27 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
this Post-Termination Release Agreement, shall not constitute a waiver of any other occurrences of the same event.
(8) |
This Post-Termination Release Agreement is assignable by uniQure, Inc. and inures to the benefit of uniQure, Inc., its subsidiaries, affiliated corporations, successors and assignees. This Post-Termination Release Agreement, being personal, is not assignable by me. |
(9) |
The covenants of this Post-Termination Release Agreement are intended to be separable, and the expressions used therein are intended to refer to divisible entities. Accordingly, the invalidity of all or any part of any section of this Post-Termination Release Agreement shall not render invalid the remainder of this Post-Termination Release Agreement or of such section. If, in any judicial proceeding, any provision of this Post-Termination Release Agreement is found to be so broad as to be unenforceable, it is hereby agreed that such provision shall be interpreted to be only so broad as to be enforceable. |
b. |
I acknowledge and agree that all of my obligations under Sections 5 and 6 of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect and shall survive the termination of my employment with the Releasees and the execution of this Post-Termination Release Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, because my employment was terminated by uniQure, Inc. without Cause or by a layoff, the non-competition clause in Section 6.3 of my Employment Agreement does not apply to me. However, if I sign and do not timely revoke this Post-Termination Release Agreement, I will be bound not to compete as set forth in Section 5.a., above, of this Post-Termination Release Agreement. |
6.Consultation with Attorney. uniQure, Inc. advised and encouraged me to consult with an attorney prior to executing this Post-Termination Release Agreement. I acknowledge that if I have executed this Post-Termination Release Agreement without consulting an attorney, I have done so knowingly and voluntarily.
7.Period for Review. I acknowledge that I have been given at least twenty-one (21) days from the date I first received this Post-Termination Release Agreement (or, if my termination is part of a group reduction in force, at least forty-five (45) days from the date I first received this Post-Termination Release Agreement, including an exhibit in accordance with the OWBPA listing the ages and titles of the employees in my decisional unit who were selected for termination and eligible to receive severance benefits in exchange for signing a general release of claims, and the employees who were not selected for termination and not eligible to receive severance benefits in exchange for signing a general release of claims) during which to consider signing it.
8.Revocation of Post-Termination Release Agreement. I acknowledge and agree that I have the right to revoke my acceptance of this Post-Termination Release Agreement if I notify the Releasees in writing within seven (7) business days following the date I sign it. Any revocation, to be effective, must be in writing, signed by me, and either (a) postmarked within seven (7) business days of the date I signed it and addressed to the then-current address of uniQure, Inc.’s headquarters (to the attention of the General Counsel); or (b) hand delivered within seven (7) business days of execution of this Post-Termination Release Agreement to uniQure, Inc.’s General Counsel. This Post-Termination Release Agreement will become effective on the eighth (8th) business day after I sign it (the “Effective Date of this Post-Termination Release Agreement”); provided that I have not timely revoked it.
Matthew Kapusta |
28 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
9.Governing Law. This Post-Termination Release Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, but not the Commonwealth’s laws concerning conflict of laws, and shall be deemed to have been made in Massachusetts.
10.Consent To Exclusive Jurisdiction/Venue. The Parties hereby consent and submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal and state courts in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and to sole and exclusive venue in any Massachusetts federal court and/or Massachusetts state court located in Suffolk County, for any dispute arising from this Post-Termination Release Agreement.
11.Covenant Not to Sue Outside of Massachusetts. I agree that I will not commence, prosecute, or assist in any way another person or entity to commence or prosecute, any legal action or other proceeding (including but not limited to a declaratory judgment action) against uniQure, Inc. concerning a dispute arising from or relating to this Post-Termination Release Agreement in any forum or jurisdiction other than the state and federal courts in the state of Massachusetts.
12.Entire Agreement, Amendments. This Post-Termination Release Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the parties with respect to its subject matter, supersedes any prior communication or understanding with respect thereto, and no modification or waiver of any provision hereof shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by all of the parties hereto; provided, however, that any agreements referenced in this Post-Termination Release Agreement or executed herewith are not superseded.
I ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT I HAVE BEEN ADVISED THAT THE POST-TERMINATION RELEASE AGREEMENT IS A LEGAL DOCUMENT, AND I HAVE BEEN ADVISED TO CONSULT WITH AN ATTORNEY CONCERNING THIS POST-TERMINATION RELEASE AGREEMENT. I ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT I HAVE CAREFULLY READ AND FULLY UNDERSTAND ALL PROVISIONS OF THIS POST-TERMINATION RELEASE AGREEMENT AND I AM VOLUNTARILY AND KNOWINGLY SIGNING IT.
[signature page follows]
Matthew Kapusta |
29 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
IN, WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Post-Termination Release Agreement under seal as of the ________ day of _______ [month], _________ [year]
|
uniQure, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
Title: |
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Kapusta |
Matthew Kapusta |
30 |
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
Exhibit 10.2
AMENDED AND RESTATED UNIQURE N.V.
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
The following constitute the provisions of the Amended and Restated uniQure N.V. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended from time to time, the “Plan”). The Plan was originally effective and approved by the Company’s shareholders as of June 13, 2018 (the “Effective Date”), and was amended and restated effective as of April 15, 2025 (the “Amendment Effective Date”).
Capitalized terms used but not otherwise described shall have the meaning given to them in Section 2 below.
1.Purpose. The purpose of the Plan is to provide Eligible Employees of the Company and its Designated Subsidiaries with an opportunity to purchase Ordinary Shares of the Company, on the terms and conditions set forth herein. The Company believes that the Plan will assist the Company in attracting and retaining the services of employees and aligning the interests of participating employees with those of the Company and its shareholders. It is the intention of the Company that the Plan qualifies as an “Employee Stock Purchase Plan” under Section 423 of the Code for U.S. Participants. The provisions of the Plan shall, with respect to offerings to U.S. Participants, be construed so as to extend and limit participation in a manner consistent with the requirements of Section 423 of the Code.
The Committee may authorize one or more offerings under the Plan that are not designed to comply with the requirements of Section 423 of the Code, but instead are designed to comply with the requirements of the foreign jurisdictions in which those offerings are conducted. Such offerings shall be separate from any offerings designed to comply with the requirements Section 423 of the Code but may be conducted concurrently with those offerings. In no event, however, shall the terms and conditions of any offering contravene the express limitations and restrictions of the Plan, and to the extent required by Section 423 of the Code, the Participants in each separate offering shall have equal rights and privileges under that offering in accordance with the requirements of Section 423(b)(5) of the Code and the applicable Treasury Regulations.
2.Definitions.
(a)“Benefit Access Website” shall refer to the online enrollment administration and account summary website provided by the third party vendor chosen by the Company.
(b)“Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.
(c)“Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any successor statute of similar nature. References to specific sections of the Code shall be taken to be references to corresponding sections of any successor statute.
(d)“Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board or any other committee appointed by the Board to administer the Plan.
(e)“Company” shall mean uniQure, N.V. a public company with limited liability (naamloze vennootschap) under the laws of the Netherlands.
(f)“Compensation” shall mean (i) base salary or base wages and (ii) payments for commissions, overtime, incentive compensation and bonuses.
1
Such Compensation shall be calculated before deduction of (A) any income or employment tax or other withholdings or (B) any contributions made by the Participant to any Section 401(k) of the Code salary deferral plan or any Section 125 of the Code cafeteria benefit program or any Section 132(f)(4) of the Code transportation fringe benefit program or any other plan or program now or hereafter established by the Company or any Subsidiary. However, Compensation shall not include any contributions made by the Company or any Subsidiary on the Participant’s behalf to any employee benefit or welfare plan or other plan or program now or hereafter established (other than Sections 401(k), 125 or 132(f)(4) of the Code contributions deducted from such Compensation). The Committee may make modifications to the definition of Compensation for one or more offerings as deemed appropriate.
(g)“Continuous Status” shall mean the absence of any interruption or termination of service as an employee. Continuous Status as an employee shall not be considered interrupted in the case of a leave of absence agreed to in writing by the Company or an absence by reason of uniformed military service, provided that, except as otherwise required by applicable law, such leave is for a period of not more than 90 days or reemployment upon the expiration of such leave is guaranteed by contract or statute.
(h)“Contributions” shall mean all amounts credited to the account of a Participant pursuant to the Plan by payroll deduction, direct payment or otherwise.
(i)“Designated Subsidiaries” shall mean the Subsidiaries which have been designated by the Board or the Committee from time to time as eligible to participate in the Plan.
(j)“Eligible Employee” shall mean, unless otherwise mandated by local law, any person who is customarily employed for at least 20 hours per week by the Company or one of its Designated Subsidiaries; provided that, unless otherwise determined by the Committee with respect to any Offering Period, any employee who is both (i) a “highly compensated employee” as defined within the meaning of Section 414(q) of the Code and (ii) an officer for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act shall not be an Eligible Employee.
(k)“Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(l)“Fair Market Value” shall mean the U.S. Dollar closing price at which the Ordinary Shares shall have been sold regular way on NASDAQ on the date as of which such value is being determined or, if no sales occurred on such day, then on the next preceding day on which there were such sales, or, if at any time the Ordinary Shares shall not be listed on NASDAQ, the fair market value as determined by the Committee on the basis of available prices for such Ordinary Shares or in such manner as may be authorized by applicable regulations under the Code.
(m)“Offering Date” shall mean the first day of each Offering Period of the Plan.
(n)“Offering Period” shall mean a period of time defined by the Committee during which a Participant’s Contributions are accumulated for the purpose of purchasing shares of the Company’s Ordinary Shares. The maximum offering period under the Plan is 27 months.
(o)“Ordinary Shares” shall mean the ordinary shares (€0.05 par value per share) of the Company.
(p)“Participant” shall mean any Eligible Employee who elects to participate in the Plan.
2
(q)“Plan Coordinator” shall mean the individual designated by the Committee to handle administrative matters with respect to the Plan.
(r)“Purchase Date” shall mean the last day of each Purchase Period of the Plan.
(s)“Purchase Period” shall mean the period of time within an Offering Period in which Contributions are accumulated for the purpose of buying shares on the next scheduled Purchase Date in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Plan. Generally, the Purchase Period falls between the Offering Date and the Purchase Date or between Purchase Dates where there are multiple Purchase Dates within one Offering Period.
(t)“Registration Statement” shall mean the Company’s registration statement(s) on Form S-8 under the Securities Act with respect to the Ordinary Shares to be issued under the Plan.
(u)“Reorganization Event” shall be deemed to have occurred upon any of the following events:
(i) any person or other entity (other than any of the Company’s subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan sponsored by the Company or any of its subsidiaries), including any person as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, becomes the beneficial owner, as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the total combined voting power of all classes of capital shares of the Company normally entitled to vote for the election of directors of the Company (the “Voting Shares”);
(ii) consummation of the sale of all or substantially all of the property or assets of the Company; or
(iii) consummation of a consolidation or merger of the Company with another corporation (other than with any of the Company’s subsidiaries), which results in the shareholders of the Company immediately before the occurrence of the consolidation or merger owning, in the aggregate, less than 51% of the Voting Shares of the surviving entity.
(v)“Securities Act” shall mean the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
(w)“Subsidiary” shall mean a corporation, domestic or foreign, of which not less than 50% of the voting shares are held by the Company or a Subsidiary, whether or not such corporation now exists or is hereafter organized or acquired by the Company or a Subsidiary.
3.Eligibility.
(a)Generally. Any person who is an Eligible Employee as of the Offering Date of a given Offering Period shall be eligible to participate in such Offering Period under the Plan, subject to the requirements of Section 5(a) of the Plan and the limitations imposed by Section 423(b) of the Code.
(b)Limitations on Grant and Accrual. Any provisions of the Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, no Eligible Employee shall be granted an option under the Plan (i) if, immediately after grant, such Eligible Employee (or any other person whose shares would be attributed to such Eligible Employee pursuant to Section 424(d) of the Code) would own shares and/or hold outstanding options to purchase shares possessing 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of shares of the Company or of any parent or Subsidiary of the Company, or (ii) if such option would permit such Eligible Employee’s rights to purchase shares under all employee stock purchase plans (described in Section 423 of the Code) of the Company and its Subsidiaries to accrue at a rate that exceeds the maximum amount allowed under Section 423(b)(8) of the Code of Fair Market Value of such shares (i.e., $25,000 or such other amount as set forth in the Code, as determined at the time such option is granted) for each calendar year in which such option is outstanding at any time.
3
4.Offering Periods and Purchase Periods.
(a)Offering Periods. The Plan shall be implemented by a series of Offering Periods of such duration or durations as may be determined by the Committee, with new Offering Periods commencing on such date or dates as may be determined by the Committee. The initial Offering Period under the Plan shall not commence prior to the effective date of the Registration Statement. The Committee shall have the power to change the duration and/or the frequency of Offering Periods with respect to future offerings if such change is announced at least five days prior to the scheduled beginning of the first Offering Period to be affected. Unless the Committee determines otherwise before the beginning of the applicable Offering Period, Offering Periods shall commence at six-month intervals on each January 1 and July 1 (or the next U.S. business day, if such date is not a U.S. business day) over the term of the Plan, and each Offering Period shall last for six months, ending on June 30 or December 31, as the case may be (or the next closest business day preceding such date, if such date is not a business day). Accordingly, unless the Committee determines otherwise, two separate Offering Periods shall commence in each calendar year during which the Plan remains in existence.
(b)Purchase Periods. Each Offering Period shall consist of one or more consecutive Purchase Periods as determined by the Committee with the duration or durations determined by the Committee. The last day of each Purchase Period shall be the “Purchase Date” for such Purchase Period. The initial Purchase Period under the Plan shall not commence prior to the effective date of the Registration Statement; and the initial Purchase Date under the Plan shall not take place unless, prior thereto, the Plan shall have been approved by the shareholders of the Company as required by Section 19(c) below. The Committee shall have the power to change the duration and/or frequency of Purchase Periods with respect to future purchases if such change is announced at least five days prior to the scheduled beginning of the first Purchase Period to be affected. Unless the Committee determines otherwise before the beginning of the applicable Purchase Period, Purchase Periods shall run coincident with Offering Periods.
5.Participation.
(a)Enrollment. An Eligible Employee may become a Participant in the Plan by enrolling on the Benefit Access Website on or before the 15th day of the month preceding the Offering Date, unless a later time is set by the Committee for all Eligible Employees with respect to a given Offering Period (and in any event, not before the effective date of the Registration Statement with respect to the Ordinary Shares offered thereunder). The contribution election made on the Benefit Access Website shall set forth the amount to be paid as Contributions pursuant to the Plan, such amount to be paid derived from payroll deductions from the Participant’s Compensation or as otherwise provided in accordance with Section 6. Payroll deductions collected in a currency other than U.S. Dollars shall be converted into U.S. Dollars on the Purchase Date for the Purchase Period in which collected, with such conversion to be based on an exchange rate determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. Any changes or fluctuations in the exchange rate at which the payroll deductions collected on the Participant’s behalf are converted into U.S. Dollars on each Purchase Date shall be borne solely by the Participant. The Committee shall establish a Contribution limitation not to exceed the maximum amount allowed under Section 423(b)(8) of the Code (and if no such limitation is established, it shall be deemed to be such maximum amount allowed under Section 423(b)(8) at the time an option is granted under the Plan).
4
(b)Payroll Deductions. Payroll deductions shall commence on the first payroll following the Offering Date and shall end on the last payroll paid on or prior to the last day in the Purchase Period of the Offering Period to which the contribution election is applicable, unless sooner terminated by the Participant as provided in Section 10 of this Plan.
6.Method of Payment of Contributions.
(a)Funding Methods. A Participant may fund the Participant’s Contributions to the Plan by any of the following methods, to the extent permitted by the Committee:
(i)Payroll Deductions. Electing to have Compensation deducted from each of the Participant’s biweekly (or other periodic) paychecks during the Offering Period, and all such payroll deductions made by a Participant shall be credited to the Participant’s account under the Plan; or
(ii)Other Methods. Utilizing such other funding method or methods as the Committee may from time to time approve, and as may be (A) permitted under applicable laws, regulations or stock exchange or trading system rules, and (B) consistent with the tax treatment of the Plan under the Code with respect to U.S. Participants.
(b)Withdrawal; Change in Deductions. A Participant may discontinue the Participant’s participation in the Plan through the Benefit Access Website, as provided in Section 10 of this Plan. Except to the extent required by applicable law or otherwise permitted by the Committee, a Participant may not change (increase or decrease) the rate of the Participant’s Contributions during the Offering Period.
(c)Tax Limitations on Contributions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent necessary to comply with Section 423(b)(8) of the Code and Section 3(b) herein, a Participant’s Contributions may be decreased to 0% of the Participant’s Compensation at such time during any Offering Period which is scheduled to end during the current calendar year if the aggregate of all Contributions accumulated with respect to such Offering Period and any other Offering Period ending within the same calendar year will otherwise exceed the maximum amount allowed under Section 423(b)(8) of the Code. Contributions at the rate elected on the Benefit Access Website during such Offering Period shall recommence at the beginning of the subsequent Offering Period to the extent compliant with Section 423 of the Code, if applicable, unless terminated or changed by the Participant as provided in Section 10 hereof.
7.Grant of Option.
(a)Option Price. On the Offering Date of each Offering Period, each Eligible Employee participating in such Offering Period shall be granted an option to purchase on the applicable Purchase Date a number of the Company’s Ordinary Shares determined by dividing such Eligible Employee’s Contributions accumulated prior to such Purchase Date and retained in the Participant’s account as of the Purchase Date by the lesser of (i) 85% of the Fair Market Value of an Ordinary Share on the Offering Date, or (ii) 85% of the Fair Market Value of an Ordinary Share on the Purchase Date; provided however, that the purchase shall be subject to limitations set forth in Sections 3(b), 7(b) and 13. The Fair Market Value of an Ordinary Share shall be determined as provided in Section 2(1) of this Plan.
5
(b)Share Limit. In addition to other limits set forth in the Plan, the maximum number of Ordinary Shares that may be purchased by an Eligible Employee during an Offering Period is 1,750 Ordinary Shares, or such other number of shares as the Committee determines before the beginning of the applicable Offering Period.
8.Exercise of Option. Unless a Participant withdraws or is deemed to have withdrawn from the Plan as provided in Sections 10 or 11 hereof, the Participant’s option for the purchase of shares will be exercised automatically on each Purchase Date within an Offering Period, and the maximum number of full shares subject to the option will be purchased at the applicable option price with the accumulated Contributions in the Participant’s account. The shares purchased upon exercise of an option hereunder shall be deemed to be transferred to the Participant on the Purchase Date. During a Participant’s lifetime, the Participant’s option to purchase shares hereunder is exercisable only by the Participant.
9.Delivery. As promptly as practicable after each Purchase Date within each Offering Period, the Company shall arrange the delivery to each Participant’s brokerage account established by the Company at a Company-designated brokerage firm of a certificate or book-entry deposit representing the shares purchased upon exercise of the Participant’s option. Any cash remaining to the credit of a Participant’s account under the Plan after a purchase by the Participant of shares at the termination of each Purchase Period, or which is insufficient to purchase a full Ordinary Share of the Company, shall be carried over to the next Purchase Period if the Eligible Employee continues to participate in the Plan, or if the Eligible Employee does not continue to participate, shall be returned to the Participant (in the currency in which collected).
10.Voluntary Withdrawal; Termination or Change of Employment Status; Reorganization Event.
(a)Withdrawal. A Participant may withdraw all but not less than all of the Contributions credited to the Participant’s account under the Plan at any time prior to each Purchase Date by giving notice to the Company via the Benefit Access Website in such form as the Plan Coordinator shall reasonably require. All of the Participant’s Contributions credited to the Participant’s account will be paid to the Participant promptly after receipt of notice of the Participant’s withdrawal. The Participant’s option for the current period will be automatically terminated, and no further Contributions for the purchase of shares may be made during the Offering Period. The Participant’s withdrawal from a particular Offering Period shall be irrevocable, and the Participant may not subsequently rejoin that Offering Period at a later date. In order to resume participation in any subsequent Offering Period, such individual must re-enroll in the Plan on or before the Offering Date of that Offering Period in accordance with Section 5(a) above.
(b)Termination of Employment; Change in Status. Upon termination of a Participant’s Continuous Status as an Eligible Employee prior to the Purchase Date within an Offering Period for any reason, including without limitation voluntary or involuntary termination of employment, retirement or death, the Contributions credited to such Participant’s account will be returned (in the currency in which collected) to the Participant or, in the case of the Participant’s death, to the Participant’s estate, and the Participant’s option will be automatically terminated.
(c)Subsequent Offerings. A Participant’s withdrawal from an Offering Period will not have any effect upon the Participant’s eligibility to participate in a succeeding Offering Period or in any similar plan which may hereafter be adopted by the Company.
6
(d)Reorganization Event. Unless the Committee determines otherwise prior to the effective date of any Reorganization Event, in the event of a Reorganization Event during an Offering Period, no option will be exercised for such Offering Period, Contributions will cease and all Contributions accrued during an Offering Period up until the date immediately prior to the date of the Reorganization Event shall be refunded to Participants (in the currency in which collected).
11.Automatic Withdrawal and Reset. To the extent permitted by applicable laws, regulations or stock exchange or trading system rules, if the Fair Market Value of the shares on the first Purchase Date of any Offering Period which contains more than one Purchase Date is less than the Fair Market Value of the shares on the Offering Date for such Offering Period, then every Participant shall automatically (i) be deemed to have withdrawn from such Offering Period at the close of such Purchase Date and after the acquisition of shares for such Purchase Period, and (ii) be deemed to have enrolled in a new Offering Period commencing on the first business day subsequent to such Purchase Period.
12.Interest. No interest shall accrue on the Contributions of a Participant in the Plan, whether utilized to purchase shares or repaid to the Participant.
13.Company Ordinary Shares.
(a)Shares Subject to the Plan. The maximum number of the Company’s Ordinary Shares which shall be made available for sale under the Plan shall be 150,000 Ordinary Shares, subject to adjustment upon changes in capitalization of the Company as provided in Section 18 hereof. If the total number of shares which would otherwise be subject to options granted pursuant to Section 7(a) hereof on the Offering Date of an Offering Period exceeds the number of shares then available under the Plan (after deduction of all shares for which options have been exercised or are then outstanding), the Company shall make a pro rata allocation of the shares remaining available for option grant in as uniform a manner as shall be practicable and as it shall determine to be equitable. In such event, the Company shall give written notice of such reduction of the number of shares subject to the option to each Eligible Employee affected thereby and shall similarly reduce the rate of Contributions, if necessary. The Plan shall automatically terminate immediately after the Purchase Date as of which the supply of available shares is exhausted.
(b)No Rights as a Shareholder. The Participant will have no interest or voting right in shares covered by the Participant’s option until such option has been exercised.
(c)Issuance and Delivery. Shares to be delivered to a Participant under the Plan will be registered in the name of the Participant or in the name of the Participant and the Participant’s spouse and delivered or credited in book-entry form to the Participant’s brokerage account.
14.Administration. The Committee by delegated authority from the Board, shall supervise and administer the Plan and shall have full power to adopt, amend and rescind any rules deemed desirable and appropriate for the administration of the Plan and not inconsistent with the Plan, to construe and interpret the Plan, and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. The Committee’s interpretations and decisions in respect of the Plan, the rules and regulations pursuant to which it is operated, and the rights of Participants hereunder shall be final and conclusive. The Committee may appoint and remove the Plan Coordinator in its discretion, and may delegate such administrative or ministerial duties to the Plan Coordinator as the Committee shall determine. The Board may take all actions that the Committee may take hereunder, at the Board’s discretion.
7
15.Brokerage Account Transfer Restrictions.
(a)Unless the shares are sold, the Committee may provide that the Ordinary Shares acquired under the Plan may not be transferred (either electronically or in certificate form) from the Participant’s brokerage account established by the Company at a Company-designated brokerage firm until the end of the later of the following two periods: (x) the end of the two-year period measured from the applicable Offering Date and (y) the end of the one-year period measured from the actual Purchase Date of those shares.
(b)Unless the shares are sold, the foregoing procedures in Section 15(a) shall apply both to transfers to different accounts with the Company-designated broker holding the Participant’s brokerage account and to transfers to other brokerage firms. Any shares held in the Participant’s brokerage account following the expiration of the holding period described above in Section 15(a) may thereafter be transferred (either electronically or in certificate form) to other accounts or to other brokerage firms.
(c)The foregoing procedures in this Section 15 shall not in any way limit when the Participant may sell the Participant’s shares. Those procedures are designed solely to assure that any sale of shares prior to the satisfaction of the required holding period is made through the brokerage account. In addition, following the lapse of the restrictions under Section 15(a), the Participant may request a share certificate or share transfer from the Participant’s account should the Participant wish to make a gift of any shares held in that account.
(d) The foregoing procedures shall apply to all shares purchased by each Participant, whether or not that Participant has ceased to have Continuous Status as an Eligible Employee.
16.Use of Funds. All Contributions received or held by the Company under the Plan are general assets of the Company, free of any trust or other restriction. Such Contributions may be used by the Company for any corporate purpose, and the Company shall not be obligated to segregate such Contributions. All references in this Plan to Participants’ Plan “accounts” shall be deemed to mean the hypothetical, unfunded bookkeeping accounts maintained on the Company’s records for the administration of the Plan.
17.Reports. Each Participant in the Plan will be entitled to a statement of account promptly following the Purchase Date. Such statements will set forth the amount of Contributions, the per share purchase price, the number of shares purchased and the remaining cash balance, if any.
18.Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization.
(a)Adjustment. Subject to any required action by the shareholders of the Company, the number of Ordinary Shares covered by each option under the Plan which has not yet been exercised and the number of Ordinary Shares which have been authorized for issuance under the Plan but have not yet been placed under option (collectively, the “Reserves”), as well as the price per Ordinary Share covered by each option under the Plan which has not yet been exercised, shall be proportionately adjusted for any increase or decrease in the number of issued Ordinary Shares resulting from a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or reclassification of the Ordinary Shares, or any other increase or decrease in the number of Ordinary Shares effected without receipt of consideration by the Company; provided, however, that conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be deemed to have been “effected without receipt of consideration”. Such adjustment shall be made by the Committee, whose determination in that respect shall be final, binding and conclusive.
8
Except as expressly provided herein, no issue by the Company of shares of any class, or securities convertible into shares of any class, shall affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof shall be made with respect to, the number or price of Ordinary Shares subject to an option.
(b)Reserves. The Committee may, if it so determines in the exercise of its sole discretion, also make provision for adjusting the Reserves, as well as the price per share of Ordinary Shares covered by each outstanding option, in the event that the Company effects one or more reorganizations, recapitalizations, rights offerings or other increases or reductions of shares of its outstanding Ordinary Shares, and in the event of the Company being consolidated with or merged into any other corporation.
19.Amendment or Termination.
(a)Power to Amend or Terminate. The Board may at any time terminate or amend the Plan. Except as provided in Section 18 hereof or as otherwise required by law, no such termination may affect options previously granted, nor may an amendment make any change in any option theretofore granted which adversely affects the rights of any Participant. In addition, to the extent necessary to comply with Section 423 of the Code, the Company shall obtain shareholder approval of any amendment in such a manner and to such a degree as so required. In accordance with Section 423 of the Code, no amendment may increase the number of shares reserved for purposes of the Plan (except as otherwise provided under Section 18) and no amendment shall change the designation of corporations whose employees may be offered options under the Plan, without the approval of the shareholders of the Company.
(b)Plan Administration. Without shareholder approval and without regard to whether any Participant rights may be considered to have been adversely affected, the Committee shall be entitled, without limitation, to establish the exchange ratio applicable to amounts withheld in a currency other than U.S. Dollars, to permit payroll withholding in excess of the amount designated by a Participant in order to adjust for delays or mistakes in the Company’s processing of properly completed withholding elections, to establish reasonable waiting and adjustment periods and/or accounting and crediting procedures to ensure that amounts applied toward the purchase of Ordinary Shares for each Participant properly correspond with amounts withheld from the Participant’s Compensation, and to establish such other limitations or procedures as the Committee determines in its sole discretion as advisable and which are consistent with the Plan.
20.Notices. All notices or other communications by a Participant to the Company under or in connection with the Plan shall be deemed to have been duly given when received in the form specified by the Company at the location, or by the person, designated by the Company for the receipt thereof. All notices or other communications to a Participant under or in connection with the Plan shall be deemed effective if sent or given to the Participant at the Participant’s home or business address on the records of the Company, including if sent by electronic transmission.
21.Conditions Upon Issuance of Shares. Shares shall not be issued with respect to an option unless the exercise of such option and the issuance and delivery of such shares pursuant thereto shall comply to the reasonable satisfaction of the Company with all applicable provisions of law, domestic or foreign, including, without limitation, the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and the requirements of any stock exchange or trading system upon which the shares may then be listed or quoted. As a condition to the exercise of an option, the Company may require the person exercising such option to represent and warrant at the time of any such exercise that the shares are being purchased only for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such shares if, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, such a representation is required by any of the aforementioned applicable provisions of law.
9
22.Additional Restrictions of Rule 16b-3. The terms and conditions of options granted hereunder to, and the purchase of shares by, persons subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act shall comply with the applicable provisions of Rule 16b-3 or any successor rule. The Plan shall be deemed to contain, and such options shall contain, and the shares issued upon exercise thereof shall be subject to, such additional conditions and restrictions as may be required by Rule 16b-3 or any successor rule to qualify for the maximum exemption from Section 16 of the Exchange Act with respect to Plan transactions.
23.ERISA Status of Plan. The Plan is not intended and shall not be construed to constitute an “employee benefit plan” within the meaning of Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
24.Miscellaneous Provisions.
(a)No Rights to Participate. Neither the Plan nor any action taken hereunder, including the grant of an option, will be construed as giving any Eligible Employee the right to be retained in the employ of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, nor will it interfere in any way with the right of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to terminate any Eligible Employee’s employment at any time, subject to applicable law and the terms of any applicable employment agreement.
(b)Limits on Encumbering Rights. Neither Contributions credited to a Participant’s account nor any rights with regard to the exercise of an option or to receive shares under the Plan may be assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of in any way by the Participant. Any such attempt at assignment, transfer, pledge or other disposition shall be without effect, except that the Company may treat such act as an election to withdraw funds in accordance with Section 10 hereof.
(c)Nonexclusivity of the Plan. Neither the adoption of the Plan by the Board nor its submission to the shareholders of the Company for approval will be construed as creating any limitations on the power of the Board or the Committee to adopt such other compensatory arrangements as it may deem desirable, including, without limitation, the granting of options otherwise than under the Plan, and such arrangements may be either applicable generally or only in specific cases.
(d)Withholding Taxes. The Company’s obligation to deliver shares upon exercise of an option under the Plan shall be subject to the satisfaction of all income, employment and payroll taxes, social insurance contributions, payment on account obligations or other payments required to be collected, withheld or account for in connection with the option.
(e)Governing Law. Except to the extent preempted by any applicable federal law, the Plan and the options granted hereunder shall be construed and administered in accordance with the laws of the Netherlands, without reference to the principles of conflicts of laws thereunder.
(f)Severability. In the event any provision of the Plan shall be held to be illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions hereof, and the Plan shall be construed or enforced as though the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.
(g)Headings. The section headings of the Plan are for reference only. In the event of a conflict between a section heading and the content of a section of the Plan, the content to the section shall control.
10
(h)No Claims for Compensation. Options granted under the Plan and Ordinary Shares acquired under the Plan are extraordinary items that do not constitute compensation of any kind for services of any kind rendered to the Company or the Subsidiaries.
25.Effective Date; Term of Plan. The Plan was originally effective on the Effective Date and shall be amended and restated effective as of the Amendment Effective Date. The Plan shall continue in effect through June 12, 2028, unless sooner terminated under Sections 13 or 19 hereof.
11
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
I, Matthew Kapusta, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of uniQure N.V.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
By: |
/s/ MATTHEW KAPUSTA |
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Kapusta |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
M |
May 9, 2025 |
Exhibit 31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
I, Christian Klemt, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of uniQure N.V.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
By: |
/s/ CHRISTIAN KLEMT |
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Klemt |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
May 9, 2025 |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with this Quarterly Report of uniQure N.V. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2025, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Matthew Kapusta, Chief Executive Officer, and Christian Klemt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1 the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
By: |
/s/ MATTHEW KAPUSTA |
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Kapusta |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
May 9, 2025 |
|
By: |
/s/ CHRISTIAN KLEMT |
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Klemt |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
May 9, 2025 |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to uniQure N.V. and will be retained by uniQure N.V. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.