◦Adjusted EBITDA in the SE&E business reached $68.1 million and $98.0 million during 2Q25 and 6M25, 36.3% and 38.3% lower year-over-year respectively.

▪(+) Higher net sales driven by (i) higher volumes of ethanol sold thanks to our efficient carry-over strategy and (ii) higher average selling prices for both ethanol and energy.

▪(+) Sugar max scenario (50% in 2Q25 / 48% in 6M25) as prices traded above hydrous ethanol in MS. Within ethanol, we prefer hydrous over anhydrous due to better prices.

▪(-) Lower crushing during 2Q25 and 6M25 (13.5% and 19.8% down, respectively) explained by less effective milling days during 2Q25 (75% higher rains in April versus the 15-year average), coupled with selective cane crushing done in 1Q25 (focused on cane with limited growth potential).

▪(-) Year-to-date cost of production at 9.0 cts/lb (versus 7.9 cts/lb in 6M24) driven by lower dilution of fixed and variable costs on lower TRS equivalent produced.

▪(-) Year-over-year loss in biological assets due to lower quantity of harvested cane versus 2Q24 and 6M24, coupled with lower year-over-year gains in our commodity hedge position.

Outlook

◦(-) We foresee a recovery in our productivity indicators for 2H25 versus 1H25, but below initial expectations given a cold front experienced during the end of June that impacted yields. Despite this, we expect our annual crushing volume to be in line with 2024.

◦(+) Global sugar demand continues to rely on Brazil's production. Concerns on how Brazil's 2025/26 harvest season will evolve in terms of crushing, prices and flexibility to produce both sugar and ethanol. We still have a portion of our 2025 sugar production open (69% hedged at 20.2 cts/lb) and no commitments for our 2026 production.

◦(+) Tight supply & demand scenario for ethanol. Consumer preference continues to favor ethanol but supply will also depend on Brazil's overall production. Moreover, the E30 mandate (increasing the ethanol blend in gasoline to 30%) became effective on August 1st, increasing demand by approximately ∼100 thousand m3 of anhydrous ethanol monthly. We have the flexibility to switch our maximization strategy to produce the product that offers the highest marginal contribution.

◦Adjusted EBITDA for the Farming business reached $1.1 million in 2Q25 and $17.7 million in 6M25, $36.7 million and $64.1 million lower year-over-year, respectively. Excluding the sale of La Pecuaria farm in April 2024, Adjusted EBITDA was down $21.7 million and $49.1 million during each period, respectively.

▪(+) Higher volumes sold of our Dairy value-added products.

▪(+) Record production in our Rice operations.

▪(-) Lower prices for crops, rice and dairy products.

▪(-) Year-over-year losses in the mark-to-market of our biological asset and agricultural produce for our Crops and Rice operations on lower prices.

▪(-) Higher costs in U.S. dollar terms.

Outlook

◦(-) Crops: Margins will remain pressured on lower prices and higher costs in U.S. dollars terms, coupled with in line-to-below historical yields for the 2024/25 harvest season.

◦(-) Rice: Although we had a record production in terms of yields and higher planted area, global prices continue their downward trend on greater global supply. Our diversified product portfolio and market flexibility will partially mitigate this decline but we foresee lower results than the previous year.

◦(-/+) Dairy: Lower prices in some of our value-added products due to a weaker demand in the domestic market, coupled with a decline in international prices.

Issuance of US$500 million Senior Notes due 2032 & Cash Tender Offer for Senior Notes due 2027

◦On July 29, 2025, we completed the issuance of a 7-year $500 million bond with a 7.50% coupon. The notes are due on July 29, 2032, and are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by certain of the Company's subsidiaries. The Company has used the proceeds of the transaction to primarily fund the cash tender offer for its 6.00% Senior Notes due 2027, which expired on July 24, 2025, with approximately $150.9 million aggregate principal of notes tendered out of the $415.6 million outstanding. Other uses of the proceeds include general corporate purposes, such as capital expenditures and liability management.

◦This transaction marks another milestone in Adecoagro's history. Not only have we improved our debt maturity profile, but also this liability management reflects our disciplined and constant search for opportunities to better finance our operations while adding financial flexibility. For more information on the aforementioned transactions, please refer to our 6-K releases, available in our IR website (https://ir.adecoagro.com/).

Adecoagro & Tether to Power Bitcoin Mining with Renewable Energy in Brazil

◦On July 3, 2025, we signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Tether to explore a strategic collaboration focused on bitcoin mining in our Sugar, Ethanol & Energy operations in Brazil. This project will allow us to monetize 10 MW of surplus energy generally sold in the spot market. It supports our strategy to diversify energy demand and unlock new sources of long-term value. The pilot project, approved by our Independent Committee in accordance with our Bylaws, aligns with our commitment to innovation, sustainability, and efficient use of our renewable energy assets.

Reduction of Export Taxes in Argentina

◦On July 26, 2025, the Argentine government announced a permanent reduction in export taxes on agricultural commodities, including three of our products that remain subject to these levies. The export tax on soybean was reduced from 33% to 26%, while corn and wheat were lowered from 12% to 9.5%.

Although this change is not expected to materially impact our financial results (soybean, corn and wheat represent ~10% of our consolidated sales), it is a positive development. The measure is expected to enhance the competitiveness of our Crops segment and support margin expansion.

2025 Shareholder Distribution Update

◦As of the date of this report, we have already committed $45.2 million to shareholder distributions. $10.2 million were expended in repurchasing 1.1% of the company's equity (1.1 million shares at an average price of $9.65 per share), and $35.0 million correspond to cash dividends (the first installment of $17.5 million was already paid on May 16, 2025 and the second installment will be paid in November 2025).

2024 Integrated Report

◦We believe that the more efficient and responsible we are in managing critical resources, such as land, soil, water and energy, the more profitable and sustainable we are. This, in turn, enables us to continue delivering long-term results and generating value for our stakeholders. Our sustainable food and renewable energy production models have the potential to fix carbon, conserve water, and deliver real benefits to people, the planet and the Company.

◦On May 21, 2025, we published our third-party verified 2024 Integrated Report where we describe how our sustainability strategy and best practices enhance profitability and efficiency, while presenting our key highlights from 2024.

◦The report was prepared following the International Framework <IR> Integrated Reporting, GRI and SASB standards, and shows our contribution to the United Nations' 2030 Agenda, as well as our commitment with the Paris Agreement and our goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050.

◦Below are some of our 2024 main highlights:

•$1.4 billion in Net Sales; 20% from green products (ethanol, bioelectricity and carbon credits).

•Progress made towards our goal to reduce by 20% our carbon intensity by 2030 (vs. 2021 base year). Moreover, we disclosed our low-carbon intensity businesses and their circular approach.

•We generated 14 million GJ of renewable energy (ethanol, bioelectricity and biomethane). 87% of the company's total energy consumption was self-generated and renewable.

•100% of our light vehicle fleet in our Ivinhema mill is powered with biomethane, which is produced in our own biodigester using vinasse (a by-product of the ethanol production process).

•90% of our planted area is rain fed only. For the balance, we have implemented efficient irrigation techniques that helps us to reduce water consumption by up to 30%.

•Commitment to achieve 25% female participation in leadership positions by 2030. By 2024, women in leadership positions represented 17% of our total workforce in these roles.

(1) Does not include 2,761 and 11,204 cubic meters of anhydrous ethanol that were converted by dehydrating our hydrous ethanol stocks during 2Q25 and 6M25, respectively. During 6M24, we dehydrated 5,965 cubic meters of hydrous ethanol (no dehydration during 2Q24).

Despite the dry weather conditions experienced throughout 2024 and early 2025, rainfalls received during 2Q25, mainly in the month of April (75% above the 15-year average), enabled our sugarcane plantation to continue its growth cycle. Therefore, we harvested cane with much greater productivity indicators than the prior quarters. Nevertheless, the distribution of rains resulted in a reduction in effective milling days of 13.9% year-over- year, from 74 days in 2Q24 to 63 days in 2Q25. Consequently, crushing volume during the quarter amounted to 3.4 million tons, 13.5% lower than the same period of last year. In terms of productivity, yield and TRS content reached 73 tons per hectare and 123 kg/ton, respectively, marking a 5.8% and 3.8% year-over-year decline, whereas on a quarter-over-quarter basis, they saw a 37.1% and 12.5% improvement. This recovery was mainly explained by (i) the aforementioned rains received; coupled with (ii) our decision made not to enter into certain areas during 1Q25 in order to allow cane with greater growth potential to benefit from future rainfalls.

Year-to-date, total crushing volume reached 4.9 million tons, marking a 19.8% decrease compared to last year driven by the selective crushing done in 1Q25 (mostly cane with 5th cuts and above) and a rainy 2Q25, as previously explained. Therefore, our average yield stood at 65 tons per hectare, 12.5% lower year-over-year, whereas TRS content was down to 118 kg/ton compared to 124 kg/ton during 6M24.

In line with our strategy to maximize production of the product with the highest marginal contribution, we prioritized the production of sugar throughout the quarter. Within our ethanol production, we continued to maximize the production of hydrous ethanol as this type of fuel was preferred by consumers over gasoline given its better pricing at the pump, thus gaining market share in the Otto cycle. Moreover, we can dehydrate hydrous ethanol at any time and turn it into anhydrous ethanol, which can be sold either to the domestic or export market, wherever the price premium is better.

On a year-to-date basis, we maximized the production of sugar throughout the year given its attractive premium over ethanol, as was the case in 6M24. Nevertheless, the total volume produced for both sugar and ethanol saw a 25.6% and 23.8% reduction throughout the period, respectively, in line with the aforementioned decline in total TRS equivalent produced.

Exported energy during the quarter totaled 200 thousand MWh, 19.7% lower compared to 2Q24, whereas year-to-date it reached 256 thousand MWh, marking a 20.2% year-over-year decrease. This was explained by (i) the decline in crushing volume reported in both periods, together with (ii) our decision to store some of our bagasse during 2Q25 to profit from better expected spot prices during the dry season. Thus, our cogeneration efficiency stood at 58.1 and 51.9 KWh sold per ton of cane crushed during 2Q25 and 6M25, respectively.

(1) Net Sales are calculated as Gross Sales net of ICMS, PIS COFINS, INSS and IPI taxes; (2) Includes commercialization of energy from third parties; (3) Total Net Sales do not include the sale of soybean, corn and beans planted as cover crop during the implementation of the agricultural technique known as meiosis; (4) Corresponding to the sale of soybean, corn and beans planted as cover crop during the implementation of meiosis. (5) Diesel sold by Monte Alegre Distribuidora (MAC), our own fuel distributor located in UMA mill.

Adjusted EBITDA during 2Q25 was $68.1 million, 36.3% lower than the same period of last year. Despite a year-over-year increase in net sales, lower EBITDA generation was mainly driven by (i) a $13.1 million year-over-year loss in the mark-to-market of our commodity hedge position on lower gains presented versus 2Q24; coupled with (ii) a $12.7 million year-over-year loss in the mark-to-market of our biological assets. In this case, the year-over-year decline is mainly explained by the lower quantity of harvested cane. Furthermore, results were also affected by a $1.1 million year-over-year increase in selling expenses on higher PIS/COFINS and INSS due to higher volumes of ethanol sold. On a year-to-date basis, Adjusted EBITDA amounted to $98.0 million, presenting an 38.3% decrease versus last year explained by the same aforementioned drivers.

Net sales reached $182.8 million during 2Q25, marking a 6.4% increase compared to the previous year on higher selling volumes and prices of ethanol, coupled with greater energy prices and sugar volumes sold, which in turn fully offset the decline in sugar prices in US dollar terms. During the first semester, net sales amounted to $301.7 million, 9.6% higher year-over-year mostly explained by higher volumes and prices for our ethanol sales.

In the case of sugar, revenues remained unchanged versus 2Q24 due to higher volumes sold, which in turn fully offset the decline in sugar prices in US dollar terms. Due to our constructive view on sugar prices for the upcoming months, volumes sold during the period were mostly related to the delivery of contracts, coupled with the sale of bagged VHP, which commanded a premium over spot prices. On an year-to-date basis, sugar sales were 17.4% down year-over-year, explained by the aforementioned decrease in prices as well as to a decline in selling volumes as sugar production during the period was down 25.6% year-over-year given the lower crushing volume and TRS content.

Ethanol sales presented a 15.4% year-over-year increase during 2Q25 on higher volume sold and prices. As anticipated, ethanol prices throughout the period remained strong, despite the beginning of Brazil's 2025/26 harvest season as mills were maximizing the production of sugar and consumer's preference continued to favor hydrous ethanol over gasoline given its attractiveness at the pump. Therefore, we sold what we produced over the period to profit from this scenario and free up storage capacity, if needed. On a year-to-date basis, higher ethanol revenues were mostly driven by our strategic decision to clear out our tanks and sell our daily production to profit from the recovery in prices (our average net selling price during 6M25 was ∼R$2,700/m3, 17.6% higher than the same period of last year). This shows our commercial flexibility to decide when to conduct our sales and consequently, maximize profits.

Due to the efficiency and sustainability in our operations, ranked among the highest in the industry, we have the right to issue carbon credits (CBio) every time we sell ethanol. During the quarter, we sold $2.7 million worth of CBios, marking a 15.3% year-over-year increase. Year-to-date, we have already sold 393 thousand CBios, amounting to $4.0 million.

Net sales of energy presented a year-over-year increase for both 2Q25 and 6M25. This was fully explained by a 21.4% and 22.1% year-over-year increase in the average selling price, which, in turn, fully offset the year-over-year decline in volume exported given the year-over-year decrease in crushing volume.

(1)Total production cost may differ from our COGS figure as the former refers to the cost of our goods produced, whereas the latter refers to the cost of our goods sold.

In 2Q25, total production costs excluding depreciation and amortization totaled 8.1 cts/lb, marking a 7.3% year-over-year increase. Although production costs in nominal terms experienced a 10.7% year-over-year decrease, in line with the decline in crushing throughout the period, the increase in unitary costs was mainly explained by (i) higher maintenance costs on higher agricultural inputs usage, such as fertilizers; coupled with (ii) higher cane sourcing from third parties. On a year-to-date basis, our production cost amounted to 9.0 cts/lb, 13.7% higher than the same period of last year, mostly explained by a less efficient dilution of both our fixed and variable costs given the 24.3% decrease in total TRS equivalent produced, partially offset by the depreciation of the Brazilian Real versus the same period of last year.

(1) Please see “Reconciliation of Non-IFRS measures” starting on page 24 for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA.

Adjusted EBITDA in our Farming business totaled $1.1 million in 2Q25, marking a $36.7 million decrease compared to the same period of last year. Excluding the sale of La Pecuaria Farm during 2Q24 ($15.0 million in Adjusted EBITDA generation for Crops), Adjusted EBITDA was down $21.7 million year-over-year. This was mostly explained by (i) year-over-year losses in the mark-to-market of our biological assets for both our Crops and Rice operations; coupled with (ii) higher costs in U.S. dollar terms across all the segments. In the case of Crops, lower peanut margins compared to the prior harvest were the main driver towards the lower results. In Rice, lower prices at the moment of harvest fully offset the record production explained by record yields and higher planted area. In Dairy, higher costs in U.S. dollar terms, mainly from raw milk purchases, was the main contributor towards the decline in Adjusted EBITDA generation.

Year-to-date, Adjusted EBITDA was $17.7 million, $64.1 million lower than the previous year. Excluding the $15.0 million Adjusted EBITDA booked in our Crops operations due to the aforesaid farm sale, the year-over-year decline is reduced to $49.1 million. Again, results were negatively impacted by the underperformance of the three business units due to the previously explained drivers.

For a more detailed explanation, please refer to the performance description of each business line starting next page.

(1) Includes sorghum; (2) Includes barley; (3) Includes sale of certifications related to RTRS soybean (Round Table on Responsible Soy Association) and sales related to our cattle activities.

In 2Q25, sales were down year-over-year on lower volumes sold, mainly corn, whereas prices had a mixed performance. Focusing on volumes, the decline in corn was mainly explained by a lower early corn production given the dry weather experienced during summer, which negatively impacted yields. Despite this, we are seeing a significant recovery in our late corn production (currently being harvested). In terms of pricing, international prices for the main commodities continue to be pressured due to greater global supply. On a year-to-date basis, sales were 7.7% higher year-over-year on greater volumes sold of peanut, which in turn, fully offset the lower volumes of soybean and corn and the mixed price performance.

Adjusted EBITDA for 2Q25 was $26.9 million lower than 2Q24 due to an uneven year-over-year comparison as the latter reflects the sale of La Pecuaria Farm completed in April 2024 ($15.0 million booked in Adjusted EBITDA), whereas no farm sales were conducted during 2Q25. Excluding this effect in both 2Q24 & 6M24, Adjusted EBITDA was down by $11.9 million and $16.6 million during 2Q25 and 6M25, respectively. Results were negatively impacted by year-over-year losses in the mark-to-market of our biological assets line mainly due to lower peanut margins versus the prior season. Moreover, overall results were also pressured by an uneven performance in yields, mixed prices and higher costs in U.S. dollar terms.

(1) Includes the sale of 1k tons of white rice sourced from third-parties during 6M24 (no sourcing made during 2Q25, 6M25 & 2Q24). (2) Expressed in white rice equivalent.

During 2Q25, rice sales decreased 15.8% year-over-year due to a reduction in volumes sold, coupled with a $127/ton drop in the average selling price. As explained in prior releases, global prices of long grain white rice have significantly come down from the high levels seen during 2024, on the back of (i) higher global supply given the return of India to the market, as well as due to (ii) a solid 2024/25 campaign in South America. On that regard, we were able to partially mitigate the aforementioned decline thanks to the development and production of different rice varieties that command a price premium over long grain white rice. Therefore, our average selling price remained unchanged quarter-over-quarter due to a better product mix, mainly from double grain rice variety. On a year-to-date basis, the increase in sales was driven by higher volumes sold due to (i) greater rice availability on record production achieved during the 2024/25 harvest season, together with (ii) the sale of the inventories that we carried-over from 4Q24 into 1Q25 given a delayed departure of a maritime cargo. This, in turn, fully offset the 23.7% year-over-year decline in prices driven by the aforementioned drivers.

Adjusted EBITDA amounted to $2.9 million and $12.6 million in 2Q25 and 6M25, respectively, 74.0% and 71.3% lower year-over-year. Despite a record production on better productivity and higher planted area, lower EBITDA generation was fully explained by (i) an uneven year-over-year comparison due to outlier prices; (ii) higher costs in U.S. dollar terms; coupled with (iii) year-over-year losses reported in our biological assets line on lower prices at the moment of harvest ($89/ton less than the prior year).

(1) Includes sales of raw milk, processed dairy products, electricity and culled cows; (2) Includes sales of raw milk, fluid milk, powder milk and cheese, among others; (3) The difference between volume processed and volume sold is explained by the sale of raw milk to third parties.

In 2Q25, raw milk production was 47.1 million liters, marking a 3.8% year-over-year decline. This was explained by lower cow productivity versus the same period of last year, although levels are still strong at 35.8 liters per cow per day. Year-to-date, total raw milk production amounted to 93.2 million liters, marking a 4.8% year-over-year decrease compared to the previous year, as milk production stood at 35.7 liters per cow per day. We expect cow productivity to normalize during the upcoming quarters.

At the industry level, we processed 98.3 million liters of raw milk during the quarter, 14.3% higher than last year. Out of this volume, approximately 35% came from our dairy farm operations whereas the balance was sourced from local producers in nearby areas or supplied by partners to whom we provide tolling services. During the first semester, total processed milk amounted to 184.1 million liters of raw milk, marking a 10.1% year-over-year increase. We continue working on product development for the domestic and export market, offering higher value added products as well as commoditized products, and being present across different price tiers with our consumer product brands.

Adjusted EBITDA amounted to $9.6 million and $16.4 million in 2Q25 and 6M25, respectively, marking a 13.8% and 6.5% decrease compared to the same period of last year. Despite higher volumes sold of our value added products, results were negatively impacted by higher costs in U.S. dollar terms. We continue working towards achieving efficiencies in our vertically integrated operations and increasing our productivity levels in every stage of the value chain, as well as in the development of new markets for our wide portfolio of value added products.

Adjusted EBIT was $6.1 million and $9.4 million during 2Q25 and 6M25, respectively. However, once interest expense and the foreign exchange loss related to the financial debt are considered, the year-to-date results decrease to negative $7.2 million.

Adecoagro’s corporate expenses include items that are not allocated to a specific business segment, such as the remuneration of executive officers and headquarters staff, certain professional services, office lease expenses, among others. Corporate expenses for 2Q25 amounted to $13.8 million, $9.1 million higher than the previous year, while year-to-date they amounted to $24.4 million, marking a $13.9 million year-over-year increase. Excluding one-off expenses, such as the financial & legal advisory fees and other related costs incurred in connection with Tether's tender offer for our common shares, corporate expenses were $8.1 million and $15.2 million during the 2Q25 and 6M25, respectively, $3.4 million and $4.7 million higher year-over-year due to higher costs in U.S. dollar terms.

Net income amounted to negative $17.0 million during 2Q25, whereas on a year-to-date basis it reached $1.7 million, marking a $26.9 million and $55.5 million year-over-year decrease, respectively.

Nevertheless, once we exclude the impact of foreign exchange variation, as well as inflation accounting effects (all non-cash impacts), adjusted net income reached negative $14.0 million during the quarter, whereas on an accumulated basis it amounted to negative $27.5 million. The main drivers behind the year-over-year losses were (i) the lower results at a consolidated level as explained throughout this earnings release; together with (ii) lower income tax gains throughout both periods; and (iii) higher interest expenses on higher debt levels.

(1) Please see “Reconciliation of Non-IFRS measures” starting on page 24 for a reconciliation of Adjusted Net Income.

As of June 30, 2025, Adecoagro's net debt position amounted to $699.2 million, marking a 10.7% year-over-year increase. Due to the seasonality of our operations, the first half of the year is when we have the highest working capital requirements, mainly in our Farming operations, as it is the moment when we undergo planting/harvesting activities for most of our crops. The year-over-year increase in our net debt is mainly explained by a 46.1% increase in our short-term borrowings, as we were able to secure short-term financing for our working capital needs in our Farming businesses at attractive rates given the overall decline in consolidated results on a last-twelve-months basis. In terms of liquidity, our ratio stood at 1.6x, showing the Company's full capacity to repay short term debt with its cash balance.

Our Net Debt ratio (Net Debt/EBITDA) as of 2Q25 was 2.3x, 74.4% higher than the previous year mainly explained by the lower EBITDA generation during the last twelve months given the challenging price scenario for most of the commodities and value-added products that we produce. We continue with our disciplined capital allocation strategy, which includes investing in growth projects with attractive returns across our operations as well as distributing cash to shareholders; while keeping financial flexibility and diligently reducing our gross debt and cash as efficiently as possible.

We believe that our balance sheet is in a healthy position based not only on the adequate overall debt levels but also in terms of our indebtedness, most of which is long-term debt.

Adecoagro's capital expenditures amounted to $57.4 million in 2Q24, 4.3% lower compared to the previous year, while on an accumulated basis it reached $142.0 million, marking a 15.0% year-over-year decrease.

The Sugar, Ethanol and Energy business accounted for 74% or $42.3 million of total capex during the quarter. The total year-over-year reduction in maintenance capex is explained by (i) a more equal distribution of the maintenance activities done at the mills throughout the year, together with (ii) lower renewal planting costs given the use of pre-sprouted seedling (MPB), which is produced in our own biofactory and therefore helps us to reduce our seedling costs. On the other hand, expansion capex was 13.4% higher year-over-year due to greater sugarcane expansion planting and the acquisition of two-row harvesters and grunner trucks, which reduce soil compaction and diesel consumption. Year-to-date, capital expenditures amounted to $113.5 million for this business unit.

The Farming businesses accounted for 26%, or $15.1 million of total capex in 2Q25. The renewal of our agricultural equipment, as well as of our light fleet vehicles, were the main drivers towards the year-over-year increase in maintenance capex. Regarding expansion capex, investments in this front were mostly related to (i) the development of croppable land for our Rice operations; (ii) the expansion of our Parboil production capacity at San Salvador rice mill; coupled with (iii) industrial improvements in our Morteros milk processing facility to enhance efficiencies and expand our product portfolio. On a year-to-date basis, total capex amounted to $28.4 million, in line with the previous year.

2024/25 Harvest Season

(1) Includes sorghum; (2) Includes barley and peas; (3) Includes chia, sesame, potatoes and beans; (4) Production volume does not include 142,202 tons of rough rice sourced from third-parties.

As of beginning of August 2025, we harvested 296,057 hectares, or 97.1% of total area, and produced 1,211,122 tons of aggregate grains. The remaining hectares are expected to be fully harvested during the rest of the month. Due to the uneven weather patterns experienced across the regions where our crops are produced, average yields for the 2024/25 harvest season ended up below our initial expectations, and in-line-to-below historical average. On the other hand, our rice production reached a new record driven by record yields and planted area, as well as by our work on seed genetics and the implementation of new technologies.

Soybean 1st crop: Harvesting activities of our soybean production are almost concluded. During this campaign, the average yield stood at 2.8 Tn/Ha, in line with the previous year and historical average. Throughout the first half of the year, rainfall distribution varied across the different regions where our soybean production was located, resulting in solid yields in Argentina's Center-South region, but below historical average in the Northern and Western regions due to a lack of precipitations.

Corn: As of the date of this report, we are still undergoing harvesting activities for our late corn, whereas early corn harvest has been completed. As explained in our prior release, the production of our early corn was negatively impacted by the dry weather and high temperatures experienced throughout December and January, moment when yields were being defined. Nevertheless, in the case of late corn we are seeing a significant recovery in our production due to the normal weather conditions experienced throughout its development stage.

Overall, we foresee better yields than in the 2023/24 harvest season, but in line with historical average.

Peanut: Harvesting activities are still underway, with approximately 10% of our area left to be harvested. So far, we have reached a yield of 3.3 Tn/ha, slightly above historical average but below the record achieved during the previous campaign. Throughout this year, our peanut production received the necessary rainfalls during summertime to undergo a normal crop development, despite low temperatures registered during the month of April, which slightly reduced the full potential of the crop. We expect to conclude this harvest season with an average yield in line with historical.

Winter Crops: We are undergoing planting activities related to the 2025/26 harvest season for our winter crops (mainly wheat), with a total planting area expectation of approximately 27,000 hectares. The year-over-year decline in planted area is mostly explained by (i) our decision to reduce our exposure in the Northern region, which last year amounted to ∼15,000 hectares, together with (ii) a decrease in leased hectares, in order to improve crops margins. In terms of soil moisture, rainfalls received during the first half of the year favored the progress of planting activities across the country and therefore a solid campaign from Argentina at a national level is expected so far (∼21 million tons for wheat). Weather evolution throughout the second semester will be key for yield definition.

Rice: We concluded harvesting activities for our rice by mid 2Q25, reaching a record yield of 8.0 Tn/ha. As stated in the previous releases, our work on seed genetics, team's consolidation and the implementation of new technologies throughout the years, together with good weather conditions experienced during summertime, resulted in record productivity levels in our rice farms.

Inventories

(1) Includes sorghum; (2) Includes barley: (3) Expressed in white rice equivalent

Variations in inventory levels between 2Q25 and 2Q24 are attributable to changes in (i) production volumes

resulting from changes in planted area, (ii) production mix between different crops and in yields obtained,

(iii) different percentage of area harvested during the period, and (iv) commercial strategy or selling pace Adecoagro’s financial performance is affected by the volatile price environment inherent in agricultural commodities.

for each product.

Commodity Hedging

The company uses forward and derivative markets to mitigate swings in commodity prices and stabilize cash flows.

The table below shows the average selling price of our hedged production volumes, including volumes that have already been invoiced and delivered, forward contracts with fixed-price and volumes hedged through derivative instruments.

(1) Energy prices in 2025 were converted to USD at an exchange rate of BRL/USD 5.67. Energy prices in 2026 were converted to USD at an exchange rate of BRL/USD 5.80.

◦During 2Q25, global sugar prices declined steadily, dropping below 16 cts/lb by end of June, the lowest level seen since April 2021. This weakness was driven by (i) optimism given the beginning of season in Brazil's Center-South region, (ii) a better outlook for India's and Thailand's harvests, coupled with (iii) growing speculative fund activity. Despite a solid start in Brazil, May data showed lower TRS and total output year-over-year, while macroeconomic concerns such as U.S. tariff announcements and recession fears, added pressure to the bearish sentiment. Although the 2025/26 forecasted global surplus has been cut down significantly due to lower expected output coming from Brazil's Center-South region in 4Q, sugar prices have fallen close to ethanol parity and to Brazil's cost of production for the first time since 2020, raising doubts over expected supply. Going forward, the market remains sensitive to supply signals, paying special focus on Brazil's production pace during 3Q, rainfall evolution in Europe, and India's cane area and yield updates. Overall, funds have a significant net short position in the commodity, therefore any shortfall in current supply expectations could lead to a hike in prices.

◦Ethanol prices softened during 2Q25, pressured by seasonal supply and a decline in gasoline prices. Despite this, prices showed some resilience due to temporary supply constraints as mills continued to maximize sugar production under a scenario of weaker productivity indicators. According to ESALQ, hydrous and anhydrous ethanol prices decreased by 5% and 4% quarter-over-quarter, even though they remained up 13% and 14% year-over-year. In terms of sales, consumer preference continues to favor hydrous ethanol over gasoline. Furthermore, Brazil's national government confirmed the E30 mandate (which states an increase in the average ethanol blended into gasoline from 27% to 30%), starting on August 1st, potentially boosting annual demand and offering price support. This policy shift, together with a strong demand and the evolution of Brazil's Center-South harvest may further support ethanol prices during the second half of the year.

◦Brazil's carbon credit market under the RenovaBio program presented a 30% year-over-year decrease in 2Q25, reaching an average price of 63 BRL/CBio (approximately 11 USD/CBio), compared to 90 BRL/CBio (17 USD/CBio) in 2Q24.

◦In 2Q25, energy spot prices in the southeast region of Brazil were 244% higher year-over-year and 35% higher compared to 1Q25. The peak in prices was recorded in June, explained by the lower precipitations observed during the month. Southeast reservoir levels stood at 66% during June, marking a 2% decrease versus the previous month.

◦During 2Q25, soybean prices traded 1% lower at CBOT compared to 1Q25, while corn prices declined by 5%. The decrease was mainly explained by the market expectations of ample global supply, coupled with favorable weather conditions for the ongoing harvest season in the U.S. In the Argentine local market, soybean and corn prices decreased by 9% and 11%, respectively, compared to 1Q25. This was primarily driven by greater soybean and corn supply as the harvest pace for both crops advanced.

◦In 2Q25, global rices prices continued their downward trend due to strong supply from most origins in Asia and America, combined with slower sales in key destination markets. In America, current prices are discouraging planting intentions for the 2025/26 harvest season. For example, the U.S. is reducing its planted area of long grain rice by 11%, whereas in South America, a reduction of 10-15% is being estimated for the new crop, whose planting window begins in September.

◦During 2Q25, international dairy prices, such as semi hard cheese, butter, UHT milk, among others continued trading at high prices due to the low season in the Southern Hemisphere. Nevertheless, the export market started to show some regression due to (i) growth in Argentina's and Brazil's raw milk production during 1H25; (ii) Algeria denying licenses to exporters; coupled with (iii) Russia applying (once again) a 15% tax to Argentina's butter and Anhydrous Milk Fat (AMF) products. Focusing solely on Argentina's domestic market, there has been a decline in domestic prices due to an oversupply scenario.

.This press release contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about us and our industry. These forward-looking statements can be identified by words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “forecast”, “believe,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “is/are likely to,” “may,” “plan,” “should,” “would,” or other similar expressions.

The forward-looking statements included in this press release relate to, among others: (i) our business prospects and future results of operations; (ii) weather and other natural phenomena; (iii) developments in, or changes to, the laws, regulations and governmental policies governing our business, including limitations on ownership of farmland by foreign entities in certain jurisdictions in which we operate, environmental laws and regulations; (iv) the implementation of our business strategy; (v) the correlation between petroleum, ethanol and sugar prices; (vi) our plans relating to acquisitions, joint ventures, strategic alliances or divestitures, and to consolidate our position in different businesses; (vii) the efficiencies, cost savings and competitive advantages resulting from acquisitions; (viii) the implementation of our financing strategy, capital expenditure plan and expected shareholder distributions; (ix) the maintenance of our relationships with customers; (x) the competitive nature of the industries in which we operate; (xi) the cost and availability of financing; (xii) future demand for the commodities we produce; (xiii) international prices for commodities; (xiv) the condition of our land holdings; (xv) the development of the logistics and infrastructure for transportation of our products in the countries where we operate; (xvi) the performance of the South American and world economies; and (xvii) the relative value of the Brazilian Reais, the Argentine Peso, and the Uruguayan Peso compared to other currencies.

These forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties. Although we believe that our expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, our expectations may turn out to be incorrect. Our actual results could be materially different from our expectations. In light of the risks and uncertainties described above, the estimates and forward-looking statements discussed in this press release might not occur, and our future results and our performance may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements due to, inclusive, but not limited to, the factors mentioned above. Because of these uncertainties, you should not make any investment decision based on these estimates and forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements made in this press release relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made in this press release. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with IFRS, we use the following non-IFRS financial measures in this press release:

•Adjusted EBITDA

•Adjusted EBIT

•Adjusted EBITDA margin

•Net Debt

•Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA

•Adjusted Net Income

In this section, we provide an explanation and a reconciliation of each of our non-IFRS financial measures to their most directly comparable IFRS measures. The presentation of these financial measures is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, financial information prepared and presented in accordance with IFRS.

We believe these non-IFRS financial measures provide investors with useful supplemental information about the financial performance of our business, enable comparison of financial results between periods where certain items may vary independent of business performance, and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management for financial and operational decision making.

There are limitations associated with the use of non-IFRS financial measures as an analytical tool. In particular, many of the adjustments to our IFRS financial measures reflect the exclusion of items, such as depreciation and amortization, changes in fair value, the related income tax effects of the aforementioned exclusions and exchange differences generated by the net liability monetary position in USD in the countries where the functional currency is the local currency, that are recurring and will be reflected in our financial results for the foreseeable future. In addition, these measures may be different from non-IFRS financial measures used by other companies, limiting their usefulness for comparison purposes.

Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA equals the sum of our Adjusted Segment EBITDA for each of our operating segments.

We define “Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA” as (i) consolidated net profit (loss) for the year, as applicable, before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation of property, plant and equipment and amortization of intangible assets, net gain or loss from fair value adjustments of investment property land, foreign exchange gains or losses, other net financial results and bargain purchase gain on acquisition and any charges related to impairments (ii) adjusted by those items, that do not impact profit and loss, but are recorded directly in shareholders’ equity, including (a) the gains or losses from disposals of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries whose main underlying asset is farmland, reflected under the line item: "Reserve from the sale of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries” and (b) the net increase in value of sold farmland, which has been recognized in either revaluation surplus or retained earnings; and (iii) net of the combined effect of the application of IAS 29 and IAS 21 from the Argentine operations included in profit from operations.

We believe that Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA are important measures of operating performance for our company and each operating segment, respectively, because they allow investors to evaluate and compare our consolidated operating results and to evaluate and compare the operating performance of our segments, respectively, including our return on capital and operating efficiencies, from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure (interest expense from our outstanding debt), asset base (depreciation and amortization), tax consequences (income taxes), bargain purchase gain, any charges related to impairments, foreign exchange gains or losses and other financial results. In addition, by including the gains or losses from disposals of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries whose main underlying asset is farmland, investors can also evaluate and compare the full value and returns generated by our land transformation activities. Other companies may calculate Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA differently, and therefore our Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies. Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA are not measures of financial performance under IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to consolidated net profit (loss), cash flows from operating activities, segment profit from operations and other measures determined in accordance with IFRS. Items excluded from Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA are significant and necessary components to the operations of our business, and, therefore, Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA should only be used as a supplemental measure of our company’s operating performance, and of each of our operating segments, respectively.

We also believe Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted Segment EBITDA are useful for securities analysts, investors and others to evaluate and compare the financial performance of our company and other companies in the agricultural industry.

These non-IFRS measures should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for or superior to, the information contained in either our statements of income or segment information.

Our Adjusted Consolidated EBIT equals the sum of our Adjusted Segment EBITs for each of our operating segments.

We define “Adjusted Consolidated EBIT” as (i) consolidated net profit (loss) for the year, as applicable, before interest expense, income taxes, net gain from fair value adjustments of investment property land, foreign exchange gains or losses, other net financial results, bargain purchase gain on acquisition and any charges related to impairments (ii) adjusted by those items, that do not impact profit and loss, but are recorded directly in shareholders’ equity, including (a) the gains or losses from disposals of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries whose main underlying asset is farmland, reflected under the line item: "Reserve from the sale of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries” and (b) the net increase in value of sold farmland, which has been recognized in either revaluation surplus or retained earnings; and (iii) net of the combined effect of the application of IAS 29 and IAS 21 from the Argentine operations included in profit from operations.

We believe that Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT are important measures of operating performance, for our company and each operating segment, respectively, because they allow investors to evaluate and compare our consolidated operating results and to evaluate and compare the operating performance of our segments, from period to period by including the impact of depreciable fixed assets and removing the impact of our capital structure (interest expense from our outstanding debt), tax consequences (income taxes), foreign exchange gains or losses and other financial results. In addition, by including the gains or losses from disposals of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries whose main underlying asset is farmland and also the sale of farmlands, and impairments, investors can evaluate the full value and returns generated by our land transformation activities. Other companies may calculate Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT differently, and therefore our Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies. Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT are not measures of financial performance under IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to consolidated net profit (loss), cash flows from operating activities, segment profit from operations and other measures determined in accordance with IFRS. Items excluded from Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT are significant and necessary components to the operations of our business, and, therefore, Adjusted Consolidated EBIT and Adjusted Segment EBIT should only be used as a supplemental measure of the operating performance of our company, and of each of our operating segments, respectively.

Reconciliation of both Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT starts on page 27.

Net debt is defined as the sum of non-current and current borrowings less cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. This measure is widely used by management. Management is consistently tracking our leverage position and our ability to repay and service our debt obligations over time. We have therefore set a leverage ratio target that is measured by net debt divided by Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA.

We believe that the ratio net debt to Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA provides useful information to investors because management uses it to manage our debt-equity ratio in order to promote access to capital markets and our ability to meet scheduled debt service obligations.     

RECONCILIATION - NET DEBT
$ thousands			2Q25			1Q25			Chg %			2Q24			Chg %
Total Borrowings			904,907			918,449			(1.5)%			830,671			8.9%
Cash and Cash equivalents			180,607			179,530			0.6%			140,311			28.7%
Short-term investments			25,065			59,440			(57.8)%			58,616			(57.2)%
Net Debt			699,235			679,479			2.9%			631,744			10.7%

We define Adjusted Net Income as (i) profit/(loss) of the period/year before net gain/(losses) from fair value adjustments of investment property land, bargain purchase gain on acquisition and any impairment; plus (ii) any non-cash finance costs resulting from foreign exchange gain/losses for such period, which are composed by both exchange differences and cash flow hedge transfer from equity, included in Financial Results, net, in our statement of income; net of the related income tax effects, plus (iii) gains or losses from disposals of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries whose main underlying asset is farmland, which are reflected in our shareholders’ equity under the line item “Reserve from the sale of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries” if any, plus (iv) the reversal of the aforementioned income tax effect, plus (v) inflation accounting effect; plus (vi) the net increase in value of sold farmland, which has been recognized in either revaluation surplus or retained earnings, if any.

We believe that Adjusted Net Income is an important measure of performance for our company allowing investors to properly assess the impact of the results of our operations in our equity. In fact, results arising from the revaluation effect of our net monetary position held in foreign currency in the countries where our functional currency is the local currency do not affect the equity of the Company, when measured in foreign / reporting currency. Conversely, the tax effect resulting from the aforementioned revaluation effect does impact the equity of the Company, since it reduces/increases the income tax to be paid in each country. Accordingly we have added back the income tax effect to Adjusted Net Income.

In addition, by including the gains or losses from disposals of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries whose main underlying asset is farmland, investors can also include the full value and returns generated by our land transformation activities.

Other companies may calculate Adjusted Net Income differently, and therefore our Adjusted Net Income may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies. Adjusted Net Income is not a measure of financial performance under IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to consolidated net profit (loss). This non-IFRS measure should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for or superior to, the information contained in our financial statements.

Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statments

    

Statement of Income
$ thousands			2Q25			2Q24			Chg %			6M25			6M24			Chg %
Revenue			382,080			411,417			(7.1)%			707,586			673,192			5.1%
Cost of revenue			(318,346)			(334,466)			(4.8)%			(594,582)			(539,807)			10.1%
Initial recognition and Changes in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce			9,531			44,595			(78.6)%			33,093			107,700			(69.3)%
Changes in net realizable value of agricultural produce after harvest			1,337			(4,561)			n . a			2,560			(13,579)			n . a
Margin on Manufacturing and Agricultural Activities Before Operating Expenses			74,602			116,985			(36.2)%			148,657			227,506			(34.7)%
General and administrative expenses			(38,686)			(33,163)			16.7%			(70,967)			(54,847)			29.4%
Selling expenses			(39,606)			(40,136)			(1.3)%			(76,752)			(68,721)			11.7%
Other operating income, net			9,385			21,609			(56.6)%			8,395			1,135			639.6%
Profit from operations			5,695			65,295			(91.3)%			9,333			105,073			(91.1)%
Finance income			6,957			(4,479)			(255.3)%			43,357			5,025			762.8%
Finance costs			(22,674)			(81,293)			(72.1)%			(47,648)			(103,027)			(53.8)%
Other financial results - Net gain / (loss) of inflation effects on the monetary items			(5,727)			(27,100)			n .a			(5,317)			5,617			n .a
Financial results, net			(21,444)			(112,872)			(81.0)%			(9,608)			(92,385)			(89.6)%
Profit / (loss) before income tax			(15,749)			(47,577)			(66.9)%			(275)			12,688			(102.2)%
Income tax			(1,294)			57,445			(102.3)%			1,939			44,524			(95.6)%
Profit for the period			(17,043)			9,868			(272.7)%			1,664			57,212			(97.1)%