​

​

​

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

​

FORM 20-F

​

OR

☒ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024

OR

OR

Date of event requiring this shell company report                                                            

​

For the transition period from                                          to                                              

​

Commission file number 001-41373

​

AUSTIN GOLD CORP.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

​

British Columbia

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

​

1021 West Hastings Street, 9th Floor

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6E 0C3

(Address of principal executive offices)

​

Dennis Higgs, +1 (604) 644-6579, dennis.higgs@austin.gold

1021 West Hastings Street, 9th Floor

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6E 0C3

(Name, telephone, email and/or facsimile number and address of Company Contact Person)

​

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

​

​

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

​

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

​

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or stock as of the closing of the period covered by the Annual Report:

​

13,271,750 (“Common Shares” or “Shares”)

​

Indicate by check mark if the registration is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

​

☐ Yes          ☒ No

​

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

​

☐ Yes          ☒ No

​

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

​

☒ Yes ☐ No

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

​

☒ Yes ☐ No

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, and/or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

​

​

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

​

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

​

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

​

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

​

​

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

​

Item 17 ☐        Item 18 ☐

​

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

​

☐ Yes          ☒ No

​

​

​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 20-F (“Annual Report”) and the exhibits attached hereto contain “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States (“U.S.”) Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and applicable Canadian securities legislation that involve risks and uncertainties relating, but not limited to, the Company’s current expectations, intentions, plans, and beliefs. Forward-looking information can often be identified by forward-looking words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “goal”, “plan”, “target”, “intend”, “estimate”, “could”, “should”, “may” and “will” or the negative of these terms or similar words suggesting future outcomes, or other expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions, intentions or statements about future events or performance. Examples of forward-looking information in this Annual Report include Austin Gold Corp. and subsidiaries (the “Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) plans and timing regarding further exploration, drilling and development, the prospective nature of exploration and development targets, the ability to upgrade and convert mineral reserves, capital costs, our intentions with respect to financial position and third - party financing and future dividend payments. This forward-looking information is based, in part, on assumptions and factors that may change or prove to be incorrect, thus causing actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by forward-looking information. Such factors and assumptions include, but are not limited to: failure to establish estimated reserves, the grade and recovery of ore which is mined varying from estimates, success of future exploration and drilling programs, reliability of drilling, sampling and assay data, assumptions regarding the representativeness of mineralization being inaccurate, success of planned metallurgical test-work, capital and operating costs varying significantly from estimates, delays in obtaining or failures to obtain required governmental, environmental or other project approvals, changes in government regulations, legislation and rates of taxation, inflation, changes in exchange rates and the availability of foreign exchange, fluctuations in commodity prices, delays in the development of projects and other factors.

Shareholders, potential shareholders and other prospective investors should be aware that these statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward - looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to: risks relating to estimates of mineral reserves proving to be inaccurate, fluctuations in the gold price, risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining (including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected geological or structural formations, pressures, power outages, explosions, landslides, cave - ins and flooding), risks relating to the credit worthiness or financial condition of suppliers, refiners and other parties with whom the Company does business; inadequate insurance, or inability to obtain insurance, to cover these risks and hazards, employee relations; relationships with and claims by local communities and indigenous populations; political risk; risks related to natural disasters, terrorism, civil unrest, public health concerns (including health epidemics or outbreaks of communicable diseases such as the coronavirus); availability and increasing costs associated with mining inputs and labor; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of obtaining or maintaining necessary licenses and permits, diminishing quantities or grades of mineral reserves as mining occurs; the global financial condition, the actual results of current exploration activities, changes to conclusions of economic evaluations, and changes in project parameters to deal with un - anticipated economic or other factors, risks of increased capital and operating costs, environmental, safety or regulatory risks, expropriation, the Company’s title to properties including ownership thereof, increased competition in the mining industry for properties, equipment, qualified personnel and their costs, risks relating to the uncertainty of timing of events including targeted production rate increase and currency fluctuations. Shareholders, potential shareholders and other prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward - looking information. By its nature, forward - looking information involves numerous assumptions, inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, that contribute to the possibility that the predictions, forecasts, projections and various future events will not occur. The Company reviews forward - looking information for the purpose of preparing each annual report, however the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward - looking information as a result of new information, future events or other such factors which affect this information, except as required by law. For the reasons set forth above, investors should not place undue reliance on forward - looking statements.

​

SUMMARY OF RISK FACTORS

We and our business are subject to material risks, which could cause actual results, performance and achievements to differ materially from those anticipated. Refer to the risk factors set forth in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report. These risks can be summarized as follows:

Business - Related Risks

Industry - Related Risks

Risks Related to our Common Shares

The foregoing is a summary of significant risk factors that we think could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected results. However, there could be additional risk factors besides those listed herein that also could affect us in an adverse manner. You should read the risk factors set forth in the section entitled “Risk Factors”.

​

​

STATUS AS AN EMERGING GROWTH COMPANY

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in Section 3 (a) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. We will continue to qualify as an “emerging growth company” until the earliest to occur of: (a) the last day of the fiscal year during which we had total annual gross revenues of US$1,070,000,000 (as such amount is indexed for inflation every 5 years by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)) or more; (b) the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”); (c) the date on which we have, during the previous 3 - year period, issued more than US$1,000,000,000 in non - convertible debt; or (d) the date on which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer”, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b - 2. We expect to continue to be an emerging growth company for the immediate future. In May 2022, the Company completed the first sale of equity securities under the Securities Act and may no longer qualify as an emerging growth company in 2027.

Generally, a registrant that registers any class of its securities under Section 12 of the Exchange Act is required to include in the second and all subsequent annual reports filed by it under the Exchange Act a management report on internal control over financial reporting and, subject to an exemption available to registrants that are neither an “accelerated filer” or a “larger accelerated filer” (as those terms are defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2), an auditor attestation report on management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting. However, for so long as we continue to qualify as an emerging growth company, we will be exempt from the requirement to include an auditor attestation report on management’s assessment of internal controls over financial reporting in its annual reports filed under the Exchange Act, even if we were to qualify as an “accelerated filer” or a “larger accelerated filer”. In addition, Section 103 (a) (3) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) has been amended by the JOBS Act to provide that, among other things, auditors of an emerging growth company are exempt from any rules of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board requiring a supplement to the auditor’s report in which the auditor would be required to provide additional information about the audit and the financial statements of the company.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING LINKS TO EXTERNAL WEBSITES

Links to external, or third-party websites, are provided solely for convenience. We take no responsibility whatsoever for any third-party information contained in such third-party websites, and we specifically disclaim adoption or incorporation by reference of such information into this report.

CURRENCY

Unless otherwise indicated, all references to “$”, “US dollars”, “USD”, or “US$” are to U.S. dollars. All references to “C$”, or “CAD” refer to Canadian dollars.

​

FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER FILINGS

We are considered a “foreign private issuer” pursuant to Rule 405 promulgated under the Securities Act. In our capacity as a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from certain rules under the Exchange Act that impose certain disclosure obligations and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules under the Exchange Act with respect to their purchases and sales of our shares. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required to comply with Regulation FD, which restricts the selective disclosure of material information.

For as long as we are a “foreign private issuer” we intend to file our annual financial statements on Form 20-F and furnish our quarterly financial statements on Form 6-K to the SEC for so long as we are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13(g) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. However, the information we file or furnish may not be the same as the information that is required in annual and quarterly reports on Form 10-K or Form 10-Q for U.S. domestic issuers. Accordingly, there may be less information publicly available concerning us than there is for a company that files as a domestic issuer.

We may take advantage of these exemptions until such time as we are no longer a foreign private issuer. We are required to determine our status as a foreign private issuer on an annual basis at the end of our second fiscal quarter. We would cease to be a foreign private issuer at such time as more than 50% of our outstanding voting securities are held by U.S. residents and any of the following three circumstances applies: (1) the majority of our executive officers or directors are U.S. citizens or residents; (2) more than 50% of our assets are located in the USA; or (3) our business is administered principally in the USA. If we fail to maintain our “foreign private issuer” status, we would be required to comply with Exchange Act reporting and other requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, which are more detailed and extensive than the requirement for “foreign private issuers”.

PART I

ITEM 1 - IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2 - OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3 - KEY INFORMATION

A. Reserved

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D. Risk Factors

An investment in our shares involves a high degree of risk and should be considered speculative. You should carefully consider the following risks set out below and other information before investing in our shares. If any event arising from these risks occurs, our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be adversely affected, the trading price of our shares could decline and all or part of any investment may be lost.

Our operations are highly speculative due to the high-risk nature of our business, which includes the acquisition, financing, exploration, development of mineral infrastructure and operation of mines. The risks and uncertainties set out below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our operations. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected. As a result, the trading price of our shares could decline, and investors could lose part or all of their investment. Our business is subject to significant risks and past performance is no guarantee of future performance.

Risks Related to our Financial Condition

We have a limited operating history on which to base an evaluation of our business and prospects.

We are an exploration company and have no history of operations, mining or refining mineral products. We are subject to many risks common to such enterprises, including under-capitalization, cash shortages, limitations with respect to personnel, financial and other resources and lack of revenues. There is no assurance that we will be successful in achieving a return on an investment for investors in the Common Shares and our likelihood of success must be considered in light of our early stage of operations.

There can be no assurance that the Austin Gold Properties or any other property will be successfully placed into production and will produce minerals in commercial quantities or otherwise generate operating earnings. Advancing projects from the exploration stage into development and commercial production requires significant capital and time and will be subject to the successful completion of further technical studies, permitting requirements and the construction of mines, processing plants, roads and related works and infrastructure. We will continue to incur losses until mining-related operations successfully reach commercial production levels and generate sufficient revenue to fund continuing operations.

We have no operating revenues and a history of losses.

We have no operating revenues or earnings and a history of losses, and no operating revenues are anticipated until one of our projects comes into production, which may or may not occur. As such, there is no certainty that we will generate revenue from any source, operate profitably or provide a return on investment in the future. We will continue to experience losses unless and until we can successfully develop and begin profitable commercial production at one of our mining properties. There can be no assurance that we will be able to do so.

We will require significant additional capital to fund our business plan.

We plan to focus on exploring for minerals and will use our working capital to carry out such exploration. We have no source of operating cash flow and no assurance that acceptable additional funding will be available to us for the further exploration and development of our projects. We have incurred net losses in the past, may incur losses in the future, and will continue to incur losses until and unless we can derive sufficient revenues and earnings from our mineral projects. These conditions, including other factors described herein, could result in material uncertainty regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.

It is likely that the development and exploration of our properties will require substantial additional financing. Further exploration and development of the Austin Gold Properties and/or other properties acquired by us may be dependent upon our ability to obtain acceptable financing through equity or debt, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain adequate financing in the future or that the terms of such financing will be acceptable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in the delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of our projects and we may become unable to carry out our business objectives.

We are subject to currency rate risk related to our reporting currency.

We may be subject to currency rate risk. Our reporting currency is the USD, which is exposed to fluctuations against other currencies. Our properties are located in the USA with corporate operations in Canada. Should we expand our operations into other countries, our expenditures and obligations may be incurred in foreign currencies. As such, our results of operations may become subject to foreign currency fluctuation risks and such fluctuations may adversely affect the financial position and our operating results. At this time, we have not implemented measures to mitigate transactional volatility in the CAD. We may, however, enter into foreign currency forward contracts in order to match or partially offset existing currency exposures.

We may have liquidity risk due to our reliance on additional financing.

Liquidity risk arises through the excess of financial obligations due over available financial assets at any point in time. Our objective in managing liquidity risk will be to maintain sufficient readily available cash reserves and credit in order to meet our liquidity requirements at any point in time. As we do not currently have revenue and are not expected to have revenue in the foreseeable future, we will be reliant upon equity and debt financing to mitigate liquidity risk. The total cost and planned timing of acquisitions and/or other development or construction projects is not currently determinable and it is not currently known precisely when we will require external financing in future periods. There is no guarantee that external financing will be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, and our inability to finance future development and acquisitions would have a material and adverse effect on our business and potential prospects.

Increased costs could affect our financial condition.

We anticipate that costs at our projects and properties that we may explore or develop will frequently be subject to variation from one year to the next due to a number of factors, such as changing grade, metallurgy and revisions to mine plans, if any, in response to the physical shape and location of an identified ore body. In addition, costs are affected by the price of commodities such as fuel, steel, rubber, and electricity. Such commodities are at times subject to volatile price movements, including increases that could make production at certain operations less profitable. A material increase in costs at any significant location could have a significant effect on our profitability.

Risks Related to our Company

Our reliance on a limited number of properties presents development risks.

The Austin Gold Properties include the Kelly Creek Project and the Lone Mountain Project located in Nevada, USA and the Stockade Mountain Project located in Malheur County, Oregon, USA. As a result, unless we acquire additional property interests, any adverse developments affecting these properties would have a material adverse effect upon our business and would materially affect any of our potential mineral production, profitability, financial performance and results of operations. While we may seek to acquire additional mineral properties in accordance with our business objectives, there can be no assurance that we will be able to identify suitable additional mineral properties or, if we do identify suitable properties, that we will have sufficient financial resources to acquire such properties or that such properties will be available on terms acceptable to us or at all and that we will be able to successfully develop such properties and bring such properties into commercial production.

We have no history of mineral production.

There is no history of mineral production on the Austin Gold Properties. The Austin Gold Properties are a high risk, speculative venture, and only a minimal amount of exploration and sampling has been conducted on the properties by us. There is no certainty that our proposed expenditures towards the search for and evaluation of gold or other minerals with regard to the Austin Gold Properties or otherwise will result in discoveries of commercial quantities of gold or other minerals.

Furthermore, there is no assurance that commercial quantities of minerals will be discovered by us at any properties acquired in the future, nor is there any assurance that any of our future exploration programs on the Austin Gold Properties or any other properties will yield any positive results. Even where commercial quantities of minerals are discovered, there can be no assurance that any of our properties will ever be brought to a stage where mineral resources can be identified, and mineral reserves can be profitably produced. Factors which may limit our ability to produce mineral reserves from our properties include, but are not limited to, the price of mineral resources, the availability of additional capital and financing and the nature of any mineral deposits.

We are an early-stage development company which presents additional risks to our success.

We are a junior resource company focused primarily on the acquisition, exploration and evaluation of mineral properties located in Nevada, USA and Oregon, USA. Our properties have no established mineral reserves due to the early stage of exploration at this time. Any reference to potential quantities and/or grade is conceptual in nature, as there has been insufficient exploration to define any mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the determination of any mineral resource. Quantities and/or grade described in this Annual Report should not be interpreted as assurances of a potential mineral resource or mineral reserve, or of potential future mine life or of the profitability of future operations.

The exploration and development of mineral deposits involves a high degree of financial risk over a significant period of time. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines and there is no assurance that any of our projects can be mined profitably. Substantial expenditures are required to establish mineral resources and reserves through drilling, to develop metallurgical processes to extract the metal from the ore and in the case of new properties, to develop the mining and processing facilities and infrastructure at any site chosen for mining. It is impossible to ensure that our current exploration and development programs will result in profitable commercial mining operations. The profitability of our operations will be, in part, directly related to the cost and success of our exploration and development programs, which may be affected by a number of factors. Substantial expenditures are required to establish mineral resources and reserves that are sufficient to support commercial mining operations and to construct, complete and install mining and processing facilities on those properties that are actually developed.

No assurance can be given that any particular level of recovery of minerals will be realized or that any potential quantities and/or grade will ever qualify as a mineral resource or reserve, or that any such mineral resource or reserve will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) deposit which can be legally and economically exploited.

Where expenditures on a property have not led to the discovery of mineral resources or reserves, incurred expenditures will generally not be recoverable.

Our properties are in the exploration stage.

We have not established that our properties contain any mineral reserve according to recognized reserve guidelines, nor can there be any assurance that we will be able to do so. A mineral reserve is defined by the SEC in Regulation S-K 1300 (defined below) as that part of a mineral deposit, which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. The probability of an individual prospect ever having a “reserve” that meets the requirements of Regulation S-K 1300 is extremely remote; in all probability our mineral properties do not contain any “reserves” and any funds that we spend on exploration could be lost. Even if we do eventually discover mineral reserves on our properties, there can be no assurance that they can be developed into producing mines to extract those minerals. Both mineral exploration and development involve a high degree of risk and few mineral properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines.

The commercial viability of an established mineral deposit will depend on a number of factors including, by way of example, the size, grade and other attributes of the mineral deposit, the proximity of the mineral deposit to infrastructure such as a smelter, roads and a point for shipping, government regulation and market prices. Most of these factors will be beyond our control, and any of them could increase costs and make extraction of any identified mineral deposit unprofitable.

As an emerging growth company, our auditor is not required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls.

Our independent auditors are not required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting while we are an emerging growth company. This means that the effectiveness of our financial operations may differ from our peer companies in that they may be required to obtain independent registered public accounting firm attestations as to the effectiveness of their internal controls over financial reporting while we are not. While our management will be required to attest to internal controls over financial reporting and we will be required to detail changes to our internal controls on a quarterly basis, we cannot provide assurance that the independent registered public accounting firm’s review process in assessing the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, if obtained, would not find one or more material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Further, once we cease to be an emerging growth company, we will be subject to independent registered public accounting firm attestation regarding the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting unless our public float is less than $75 million. Even if management finds such controls to be effective, our independent registered public accounting firm may decline to attest to the effectiveness of such internal controls and issue a qualified report.

We expect that we will be considered a smaller reporting company under the Exchange Act and will be exempt from certain disclosure requirements, which could make our Common Shares less attractive to potential investors.

Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act defines a “smaller reporting company” as an issuer that is not an investment company, an asset-backed issuer, or a majority-owned subsidiary of a parent that is not a smaller reporting company and that:

We believe that we are a smaller reporting company, and as such that we will not be required and may not include a Compensation Discussion and Analysis section in our proxy statements; we will provide only two years of financial statements; and we need not provide the table of selected financial data. We also will have other “scaled” disclosure requirements that are less comprehensive than issuers that are not smaller reporting companies. These “scaled” disclosure requirements make our securities less attractive to potential investors, which could make it more difficult for our securityholders to sell their securities.

We are a foreign private issuer which exempts us from complying with certain reporting requirements.

We are considered a “foreign private issuer” and will report under the Exchange Act as a non-U.S. company with foreign private issuer status. This means that, as long as we qualify as a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we will be exempt from certain provisions of the Exchange Act that are applicable to U.S. domestic public companies, including:

We may take advantage of these exemptions (or voluntarily comply with the requirements applicable to U.S. domestic public companies) until such time as we are no longer a foreign private issuer. We would cease to be a foreign private issuer at such time as more than 50% of our outstanding voting securities are held by U.S. residents and any of the following three circumstances applies: (i) the majority of our executive officers or directors are U.S. citizens or residents; (ii) more than 50% of our assets are located in the USA; or (iii) our business is administered principally in the USA.

If we fail to maintain our foreign private issuer status and decide, or are required, to register as a U.S. domestic issuer, the regulatory and compliance costs to us will be significantly more than the costs incurred as a foreign private issuer. In such event, we would not be eligible to use foreign issuer forms and would be required to file periodic and current reports and registration statements on U.S. domestic issuer forms with the SEC, which are generally more detailed and extensive than the forms available to a foreign private issuer.

It may be difficult to enforce judgments or bring actions outside the U.S. against us and certain of our directors.

We are a Canadian corporation and certain of our officers and directors are neither citizens nor residents of the USA. A substantial part of the assets of several of these persons are located outside the USA. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for an investor:

We may be a “passive foreign investment company” (“PFIC”), which may have adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences for U.S. investors.

We believe that we were classified as a PFIC for our most recently completed tax year, and based on current business plans and financial expectations, we expect that we may be a PFIC for our current tax year and subsequent tax years. If we are a PFIC for any year during a U.S. taxpayer’s holding period of Common Shares, then such U.S. taxpayer generally will be required to treat any gain realized upon a disposition of the Common Shares or any so-called “excess distribution” received on its Common Shares as ordinary income, and to pay an interest charge on a portion of such gain or distribution. In certain circumstances, the sum of the tax and the interest charge may exceed the total amount of proceeds realized on the disposition, or the amount of excess distribution received, by the U.S. taxpayer. Subject to certain limitations, these adverse tax consequences may be mitigated if a U.S. taxpayer makes a timely and effective QEF Election (as defined below) or a Mark-to-Market Election (as defined below). A U.S. taxpayer who makes a timely and effective QEF Election generally must report on a current basis its share of our net capital gain and ordinary earnings for any year in which we are a PFIC, whether or not we distribute any amounts to our shareholders. However, U.S. taxpayers should be aware that there can be no assurance that we will satisfy the record keeping requirements that apply to a qualified electing fund, or that we will supply U.S. taxpayers with information that such U.S. taxpayers require to report under the QEF Election rules, in the event that we are a PFIC and a U.S. taxpayer wishes to make a QEF Election. Thus, U.S. taxpayers may not be able to make a QEF Election with respect to us. A U.S. taxpayer who makes the Mark-to-Market Election generally must include as ordinary income each year the excess of the fair market value of the Common Shares over the taxpayer’s basis therein. This paragraph is qualified in its entirety by the discussion below under the heading “Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations — Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules.” Each potential investor who is a U.S. taxpayer should consult their own tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of the PFIC rules and the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of the Common Shares.

A limited number of our officers and directors own a majority of our Common Shares and exercise control over us.

As at March 25, 2025, our officers and directors, including Dennis Higgs (President and Director), Darcy Higgs (VP Business Development), Joseph Ovsenek (Chairman and Director), Kenneth McNaughton (Director) and Robert Hatch (VP Exploration) hold, directly or indirectly, or have control or direction over, 6,650,668 Common Shares, approximately 50.11% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares, and our largest shareholder group. Each of these individuals serve as an officer and/or director, which may give rise to conflicts of interest. As a result, these persons have the ability to influence the outcome of matters submitted to our shareholders for approval, which could include the election and removal of directors, amendments to our corporate governing documents and business combinations. Our interests and those of these persons may at times conflict, and this conflict might be resolved against our interests. The concentration of approximately 50.11% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares in the hands of these shareholders may discourage an unsolicited bid for the Common Shares, and this may adversely impact the value and trading price of the Common Shares. Joseph Ovsenek and Kenneth McNaughton have decided to not stand for re-election as directors at our next AGM scheduled for May 7, 2025.

We do not currently insure against all the risks and hazards of mineral exploration, development and mining operations.

Our business is subject to a number of risks and hazards generally, including adverse environmental conditions, industrial accidents, labor disputes, unusual or unexpected geological conditions, ground or slope failures, cave-ins, changes in the regulatory environment, natural phenomena such as inclement weather conditions, floods and earthquakes. Such occurrences could result in damage to mineral properties or production facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage to our properties or the properties of others, delays in the ability to undertake exploration, monetary losses and possible legal liability.

Although we may maintain insurance to protect against certain risks in such amounts as we consider to be reasonable, our insurance will not cover all the potential risks associated with our operations. We may also be unable to maintain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums. Insurance coverage may not continue to be available or may not be adequate to cover any resulting liability. Moreover, insurance against risks such as environmental pollution or other hazards as a result of exploration and production is not generally available to us or to other companies in the mining industry on acceptable terms. We might also become subject to liability for pollution or other hazards which we may not be insured against or which we may elect not to insure against because of premium costs or other reasons. Losses from these events may cause us to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect upon our financial performance and results of operations.

We may enter into joint ventures and partnerships which will expose us to risks related to third-party performance under these agreements.

We may in the future enter into partnerships, option agreements and/or joint ventures as a means of acquiring additional property interests or to fully exploit the exploration and production potential of our assets. The failure of any partner to meet our obligations or other third parties, or any disputes with respect to third parties’ respective rights and obligations, could have a material adverse effect on our rights under such agreements. We may also be unable to exert direct influence over strategic decisions made in respect of properties that are subject to the terms of these agreements, which may have a materially adverse impact on the strategic value of the underlying mineral claims. Furthermore, in the event we are unable to meet our obligations or share of costs incurred under agreements to which we are a party, we may have our property interests subject to such agreements reduced as a result or face the termination of such agreements.

We are subject to risks regarding completing and integrating acquisitions.

From time to time, it can be expected that we will examine opportunities to acquire additional exploration and/or mining assets and businesses. Any acquisition that we may choose to complete may be of a significant size, will require significant attention by our management team, may change the scale of our business and operations, and may expose us to new geographic, political, operating, financial and geological risks. Our success in our acquisition activities depends upon our ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates, negotiate acceptable terms for any such acquisition, and integrate the acquired operations successfully with ours. Any acquisitions would be accompanied by risks. In the event that we choose to raise debt capital to finance any such acquisitions, our leverage will be increased. If we choose to use equity as consideration for such acquisitions, existing shareholders may suffer dilution. Alternatively, we may choose to finance any such acquisitions with our existing resources, which would result in the depletion of such resources. There can be no assurance that we would be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with such acquisitions, that we would be able to successfully integrate the acquired business into our pre-existing business or that any such acquisition would not have a material and adverse effect on us.

We are reliant on certain key personnel.

Our development will depend on the efforts of key management and other key personnel, including Dennis Higgs (President and Director), Robert Hatch (VP Exploration), Darcy Higgs (VP Business Development) and Grant Bond (CFO). The loss of any of these people, particularly to competitors, could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, with respect to the future development of our projects, it may become necessary to attract both international and local personnel for such development. The marketplace for key skilled personnel is becoming more competitive, which means the cost of hiring, training, and retaining such personnel may increase. Factors outside our control, including competition for human capital and the high level of technical expertise and experience required to execute this development, will affect our ability to employ the specific personnel required. Due to our relatively small size, the failure to retain or attract a sufficient number of key skilled personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of future operations and financial condition. Moreover, we do not intend to take out ‘key person’ insurance in respect of any directors, officers or other employees.

Certain of our directors and officers may have conflicts of interest.

Certain of our directors and officers also serve as directors and/or officers of other companies involved in natural resource exploration and development and consequently there exists the possibility for such directors and officers to be in a position of conflict. Any decision made by any of such directors and officers involving us must be made in accordance with their duties and obligations to deal fairly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of our business and shareholders.

We may experience difficulty attracting and retaining qualified management to meet the needs of our anticipated growth, and the failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

The hiring and retention of qualified personnel in the mining industry is highly competitive. We may experience difficulty in competing with more established and better financed companies in retaining our current management or hiring new personnel to meet our business and financial requirements. If we are unable to hire or retain necessary personnel, it could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

When required, we may not be able to certify that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, which may negatively impact the market price of our Common Shares.

Internal controls over financial reporting are procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are properly authorized, assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use, and transactions are properly recorded and reported. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance with respect to the reliability of financial reporting and financial statement preparation. Though we intend to put into place a system of internal controls appropriate for our size, and reflective of our level of operations, there are limited internal controls currently in place. We have a very limited history of operations and have not made any assessment as to the effectiveness of our internal controls. If we identify material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, if we are unable to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in a timely manner or assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting when required, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price of our Common Shares could be negatively affected. We also could become subject to investigations by the stock exchange on which the securities are listed, the SEC, or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources.

We are dependent upon information technology (“IT”) systems, which are subject to disruption, damage, failure and risks associated with implementation and integration. A cybersecurity breach could occur and result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption, disclosure of business sensitive, confidential or personally identifiable information, misdirected wire transfers, reputational harm, and financial loss.

We are dependent upon IT systems in the conduct of our operations including systems and networks which are provided and maintained by third-party contractors. Our IT systems are subject to disruption, damage or failure from a variety of sources, including, without limitation, computer viruses, security breaches, cyber-attacks, natural disasters and defects in design. Cybersecurity incidents, in particular, are evolving and include, but are not limited to, malicious software, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data and other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information and the corruption of data. Various measures have been implemented to manage our risks related to IT systems and network disruptions. However, given the unpredictability of the timing, nature and scope of IT disruptions, we could potentially be subject to operational delays, the compromising of confidential or otherwise protected information, destruction or corruption of data, security breaches, other manipulation or improper use of our systems and networks or financial losses from remedial actions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, competitive position, financial condition or results of operations.

We are or may become subject to data privacy laws, regulations, litigation and directives relating to our processing of personal information.

The jurisdictions in which we operate (including the U.S.) have laws governing how we must respond to a cyber incident that results in the unauthorized access, disclosure, or loss of personal information. Additionally, new laws and regulations governing data privacy, unauthorized disclosure of personal information and imposing certain cybersecurity - related requirements that may provide for a private right of action and imposition of significant fines, pose increasingly complex compliance challenges. Some or all of such legislation will elevate our compliance costs over time. Our business involves collection, use, and other processing of personal information and personally identifiable information of our employees, investors, contractors, suppliers, and customer contacts. As legislation continues to develop and cyber incidents continue to evolve, we will likely be required to expend significant resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures to comply with such legislation and to detect, investigate and remediate vulnerabilities to cyber incidents that relate to data privacy. Any failure by us, or a company we acquire, to comply with such laws and regulations could result in reputational harm, loss of goodwill, penalties, liabilities, remediation costs, or mandated changes in our business practices. Each has the potential to materially impact our financial condition.

Risks Related to the Mining Industry

Mining exploration, development and operating have inherent risks.

Mining operations generally involve a high degree of risk. Our operations are subject to all the hazards and risks normally encountered in the exploration, development and production of gold and other minerals, including unusual and unexpected geologic formations, seismic activity, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding and other conditions involved in the drilling and removal of material, any of which could result in damage to, or destruction of, mines and other production facilities, damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability. The financing, exploration, development and mining of any of our properties is furthermore subject to a number of macroeconomic, legal and social factors, including commodity prices, laws and regulations, political conditions, currency fluctuations, the ability to hire and retain qualified people, the inability to obtain suitable and adequate machinery, equipment or labor and obtaining necessary services in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Unfavorable changes to these and other factors have the potential to negatively affect our operations and business.

Major expenses may be required to locate and establish mineral reserves and resources, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site. Mining, processing, development and exploration activities depend, to one degree or another, on adequate infrastructure. Reliable roads, bridges, power sources and water supply are important determinants which affect capital and operating costs. Unusual or infrequent weather phenomena, sabotage, government or other interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure could adversely affect our operations, financial condition and results of operations. It is impossible to ensure that the exploration or development programs planned by us will result in a profitable commercial mining operation. Whether a gold or other precious or base metal or mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on a number of factors, some of which are: the particular attributes of the deposit, such as the quantity and quality of mineralization and proximity to infrastructure; mineral prices, which are highly cyclical; and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting minerals and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in us not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

There is no certainty that the expenditures to be made by us towards the exploration and evaluation of gold or other minerals will result in discoveries or production of commercial quantities of gold or other minerals. In addition, once in production, mineral reserves are finite and there can be no assurance that we will be able to locate additional reserves as our existing reserves are depleted.

There may be risks and uncertainties related to title to land we own or lease and royalty interests on such land.

General

There are uncertainties as to title matters in the mining industry. Any defects in title could cause us to lose rights in our mineral properties and jeopardize our business operations. Our mineral properties currently consist primarily of unpatented lode mining claims located on lands administered by the BLM, the Nevada State Office and the Oregon State Office to which we only have possessory title of the mineral rights. At the Kelly Creek Project, where we are earning a joint venture interest, a significant portion of the property is leased private ranch lands on which both surface and mineral rights are controlled by the ranch. Because title to unpatented mining claims is subject to inherent uncertainties, it is difficult to determine conclusively the ownership of such claims. These uncertainties relate to such things as sufficiency of mineral discovery, proper location and posting and marking of boundaries, proper and timely payment of annual BLM claim maintenance fees, the existence and terms of royalties, and possible conflicts with other claims not determinable from descriptions of record.

The present status of our unpatented mining claims located on public lands allows us the right to mine and remove valuable minerals, such as precious and base metals, from the claims conditioned upon applicable environmental reviews and permitting programs. Subject to the permitting process, we are also allowed to use the surface of the land solely for purposes related to mining and processing the mineral-bearing ores. However, legal ownership of the land remains with the USA. We remain at risk that the mining claims may be forfeited either to the U.S. or to rival private claimants due to failure to comply with statutory requirements. Prior to 1993, a mining claim locator who was able to prove the discovery of valuable, locatable minerals on a mining claim, and to meet all other applicable federal and state requirements and procedures pertaining to the location and maintenance of federal unpatented mining claims, had the right to prosecute a patent application to secure fee title to the mining claim from the federal government. The right to pursue a patent, however, has been subject to a moratorium since October 1993, through federal legislation restricting the BLM from accepting any new mineral patent applications. If we do not obtain fee title to our unpatented mining claims, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain compensation in connection with the forfeiture of such claims.

Pending Federal Legislation that may affect our Operations

In recent years, members of the U.S. Congress have repeatedly introduced bills which would supplant or alter the provisions of the General Mining Act of 1872, a U.S. federal law that authorizes and governs prospecting and mining for economic minerals, such as gold, platinum, and silver, on federally administered public lands. Such bills have proposed, among other things, to either eliminate the right to a mineral patent, impose a federal royalty on production from unpatented mining claims, render certain federal lands unavailable for the location of unpatented mining claims, afford greater public involvement in the mine permitting process, provide for citizen suits, and impose new and stringent environmental operating standards and mined land reclamation requirements in addition to those already in effect. Such proposed legislation could change the cost of holding unpatented mining claims and could significantly impact our ability to develop mineralized material on unpatented mining claims. Currently, most of our mining claims are unpatented lode mining claims. Although we cannot predict what legislative changes might occur, the enactment of these proposed bills could adversely affect the potential for development of our mining claims, the economics of any mines that we bring into operation on federal unpatented mining claims, and as a result, adversely affect our financial performance.

Title to Mineral Property Interests may be Challenged

There may be challenges to title of the mineral properties in which we hold a material interest. If there are title defects with respect to any properties, we might be required to compensate other persons or to reduce our interest in the affected property. Furthermore, in any such case, the investigation and resolution of these issues would divert time of our management team from ongoing exploration and development programs. Title insurance generally is not available for mining claims in the U.S. and our ability to ensure that we have obtained secure claim to individual mineral properties may be limited. Austin Gold Properties may be subject to prior unregistered liens, agreements, transfers, or claims, including native land claims and title may be affected by, among other things, undetected defects. In addition, we may be unable to operate the properties as permitted or to enforce our rights with respect to our properties. The failure to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including a failure to pay taxes or annual BLM claim maintenance fees, may invalidate title to portions or all of the Austin Gold Properties. We may incur significant costs related to defending the title to our properties. A successful claim contesting title to a property may cause us to compensate other persons, or to reduce our interest in the affected property or to lose our rights to explore and, if warranted, develop that property. This could result in us not being compensated for our prior expenditures relating to the property. Also, in any such case, the investigation and resolution of title issues would divert management’s time from ongoing exploration and, if warranted, development programs.

Mineral Properties may be Subject to Defects in Title

The ownership and validity or title of unpatented mining claims and concessions can at times be uncertain and may be contested. We also may not have, or may not be able to obtain, all necessary surface rights to develop a property. We have taken reasonable measures, in accordance with industry standards for properties at the same stage of exploration as ours, to ensure proper title to the Austin Gold Properties. However, there is no guarantee that title to any of our properties will not be challenged or impugned.

Interpretation of Royalty Agreements; Unfulfilled Contractual Obligations

Royalty interests in Austin Gold Properties, and any other royalty interests in respect of our properties which may come into existence, may be subject to uncertainties and complexities arising from the application of contract and property laws in the jurisdictions where the mining projects are located. Operators and other parties to the agreements governing royalty interests in Austin Gold Properties may interpret their interests in a manner adverse to us, and we could be forced to take legal action to enforce our rights. Challenges to the terms of such royalty interests or the existence of other royalties could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Disputes could arise with respect to, among other things:

Natural Resource Properties are Largely Contractual in Nature

Parties to contracts do not always honor contractual terms and contracts themselves may be subject to interpretation or technical defects. Accordingly, there may be instances where we would be forced to take legal action to enforce our contractual rights. Such litigation may be time-consuming and costly and there is no guarantee of success. Any pending proceedings or actions or any decisions determined adversely to us may have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and the trading price of the Common Shares.

We may be unable to secure surface access or purchase required surface rights.

Although we acquire the rights to some or all of the minerals in the ground subject to the mineral tenures that we acquire, or have a right to acquire, in most cases we do not thereby acquire any rights to, or ownership of, the surface to the areas covered by such mineral tenures. In such cases, applicable mining laws usually provide for rights of access to the surface for the purpose of carrying on mining activities, however, the enforcement of such rights through the courts can be costly and time consuming. It is necessary to negotiate surface access or to purchase the surface rights if long-term access is required. There can be no guarantee that, despite having the right at law to access the surface and carry on mining activities, we will be able to negotiate satisfactory agreements with any such existing landowners/occupiers for such access or purchase of such surface rights, and therefore we may be unable to carry out planned mining activities. In addition, in circumstances where such access is denied, or no agreement can be reached, we may need to rely on the assistance of local officials or the courts in such jurisdiction, the outcomes of which cannot be predicted with any certainty. Our inability to secure surface access or purchase required surface rights could materially and adversely affect our timing, cost or overall ability to develop any mineral deposits we may locate.

We are subject to significant governmental regulations, which affect our operations and costs of conducting our business.

Our exploration operations are subject to government legislation, policies and controls relating to prospecting, development, production, environmental protection including sensitive plant and animal species such as the greater sage-grouse, preservation of antiquities and resources of cultural heritage, mining taxes and labor standards. In order for us to carry out our activities, our various licenses and permits must be obtained and kept current. There is no guarantee that our licenses and permits will be granted, or that once granted will be maintained and extended. In addition, the terms and conditions of such licenses or permits could be changed and there can be no assurances that any application to renew any existing licenses will be approved. There can be no assurance that all permits that we require will be obtainable on reasonable terms, or at all. Delays or a failure to obtain such permits, or a failure to comply with the terms of any such permits that we have obtained, could have a material adverse impact on us. We may be required to contribute to the cost of providing the required infrastructure to facilitate the development of our properties and will also have to obtain and comply with permits and licenses that may contain specific conditions concerning operating procedures, water use, waste disposal, spills, environmental studies, abandonment and restoration plans and financial assurances. There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with any such conditions and non-compliance with such conditions may result in the loss of certain of our permits and licenses on properties, which may have a material adverse effect on us. Future taxation of mining operators cannot be predicted with certainty so planning must be undertaken using present conditions and best estimates of any potential future changes. There is no certainty that such planning will be effective to mitigate adverse consequences of future taxation on our business.

Our financial results and access to capital may depend on commodity markets.

The price of our securities, our financial results, and our access to the capital required to finance our exploration activities may in the future be adversely affected by declines in the price of precious and base metals and, in particular, the price of gold. Precious metal prices fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control such as the sale or purchase of precious metals by various dealers, central banks and financial institutions, interest rates, exchange rates, inflation or deflation, currency exchange fluctuation, global and regional supply and demand, production and consumption patterns, speculative activities, increased production due to improved mining and production methods, government regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use and importing and exporting of minerals, environmental protection, and international political and economic trends, conditions and events. If these or other factors continue to adversely affect the price of gold, the market price of our securities may decline and our operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We are subject to risks regarding market fluctuations and commercial quantities.

The market for minerals is influenced by many factors beyond our control, including without limitation the supply and demand for minerals, the sale or purchase of precious metals by various dealers, central banks and financial institutions, interest rates, exchange rates, inflation or deflation, currency exchange fluctuation, global and regional supply and demand, production and consumption patterns, speculative activities, increased production due to improved mining and production methods, government regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use and importing and exporting of minerals, environmental protection, and international political and economic trends, conditions and events. In addition, the metals industry in general is intensely competitive and there is no assurance that, even if apparently commercial quantities and qualities of metals (such as gold) are discovered, a market will exist for their profitable sale. Commercial viability of precious and base metals and other mineral deposits may be affected by other factors that are beyond our control, including the particular attributes of the deposit such as our size, quantity and quality, the cost of mining and processing, proximity to infrastructure, the availability of transportation and sources of energy, financing, government legislation and regulations including those relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, import and export restrictions, exchange controls, restrictions on production, and environmental protection. It is impossible to assess with certainty the impact of various factors that may affect commercial viability such that any adverse combination of such factors may result in us not receiving an adequate return on invested capital or having our mineral projects be rendered uneconomic.

Estimates of mineral resources and reserves are subject to evaluation uncertainties that could result in project failure.

We currently do not have any mineral resources or reserves. Mineral resource and reserve estimates will be based upon estimates made by our personnel and independent geologists. These estimates are inherently subject to uncertainty and are based on geological interpretations and inferences drawn from drilling results and sampling analyses and may require revision based on further exploration or development work. The estimation of mineral resources and reserves may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues. As a result of the foregoing, there may be material differences between actual and estimated mineral resources and reserves, which may impact the viability of our projects and have a material impact on our business.

The grade of mineralization which may ultimately be mined may differ from that indicated by drilling results and such differences could be material. The quantity and resulting valuation of mineral reserves and mineral resources may also vary depending on, among other things, mineral prices (which may render mineral reserves and mineral resources uneconomic), cut-off grades applied and estimates of future operating costs (which may be inaccurate). Production can be affected by such factors as permitting regulations and requirements, weather, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions. Any material changes in quantity of mineral resources, mineral reserves, grade, or stripping ratio may also affect the economic viability of any project undertaken by us. In addition, there can be no assurance that mineral recoveries in small scale, and/or pilot laboratory tests will be duplicated in a larger scale test under on-site conditions or during production. To the extent that we are unable to mine and produce as expected and estimated, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

There is no certainty that any of the mineral resources identified on any of our properties will be realized, that any mineral resources will ever be upgraded to mineral reserves, that any anticipated level of recovery of minerals will in fact be realized, or that an identified mineral reserve or mineral resource will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) deposit which can be legally and economically exploited. Until a deposit is actually mined and processed, the quantity of mineral resources and mineral reserves and grades must be considered as estimates only, and investors are cautioned that we may ultimately never realize production on any of our properties.

We may not be able to obtain all required permits and licenses to place any of our properties into production.

Our current and future operations, including development activities and commencement of production, if warranted, require permits from governmental authorities and such operations are and will be governed by laws and regulations governing prospecting, development, mining, production, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety and other matters. Companies engaged in mineral property exploration and the development or operation of mines and related facilities generally experience increased costs, and delays in production and other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits. We cannot predict if all permits which we may require for continued exploration, development or construction of mining facilities and conduct of mining operations will be obtainable on reasonable terms, if at all. Costs related to applying for and obtaining permits and licenses may be prohibitive and could delay our planned exploration and development activities. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions.

Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations. Amendments to current laws, regulations and permits governing operations and activities of mining companies, or more stringent implementation thereof, could have a material adverse impact on our operations and cause increases in capital expenditures or production costs or reduction in levels of production at producing properties or require abandonment or delays in development of new mining properties.

We are subject to risks regarding health and safety laws and regulations.

Our operations are subject to various health and safety laws and regulations that impose various duties on us in respect of our operations, relating to, among other things, worker safety and the surrounding communities. These laws and regulations also grant the relevant authorities broad powers to, among other things, close unsafe operations and order corrective action relating to health and safety matters. The costs associated with the compliance with such health and safety laws and regulations may be substantial and any amendments to such laws and regulations, or more stringent implementation thereof, could cause additional expenditure or impose restrictions on, or suspensions of, our operations. We expect to make significant expenditures to comply with the extensive laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment, waste disposal, worker safety, mine development and protection of endangered and other special status species, and, to the extent reasonably practicable, to create social and economic benefit in the surrounding communities near our mineral properties, but there can be no guarantee that these expenditures will ensure our compliance with applicable laws and regulations and any non-compliance may have a material and adverse effect on our business.

Our relationship with the communities in which we operate impacts the future success of our operations.

Our relationship with the communities in which we operate is important to ensure the future success of our existing operations. While we believe our relationships with the communities in which we operate are strong, there is an increasing level of public concern relating to the perceived effect of mining activities on the environment and on communities impacted by such activities. Certain non-governmental organizations (“NGOs”), some of which oppose globalization and resource development, are often vocal critics of the mining industry and its practices. Adverse publicity generated by such NGOs or others related to extractive industries generally, or our operations specifically, could have an adverse effect on our reputation or financial condition and may impact our relationship with the communities in which we operate. While we believe that we operate in a socially responsible manner, there is no guarantee that our efforts in this respect will mitigate this potential risk.

We are subject to potential environmental risks and hazards which could adversely impact our operations.

The mining and mineral processing industries are subject to extensive governmental regulations for the protection of the environment, including regulations relating to air and water quality, mine reclamation, solid and hazardous waste handling and disposal and the promotion of occupational health and safety, which may adversely affect us or require us to expend significant funds in order to comply with such regulations. There is also a risk that environmental and other laws and regulations may become more onerous, making it more costly for us to remain in compliance with such laws and regulations, which could result in the incurrence of additional costs and operational delays or the failure of our business.

All phases of our operations in Nevada, USA and Oregon, USA will be subject to extensive federal environmental regulation, and to the state regulatory programs to which these federal requirements may have been delegated through state statutes, which may include:

These environmental regulations require us to obtain various operating approvals and licenses and also impose standards and controls relating to exploration, development and production activities. Mining projects are required to prepare and receive Federal and State approval of a reclamation plan and provide financial assurance to ensure that the reclamation plan is implemented upon completion of operations. Compliance with federal and state regulations could result in delays in beginning or expanding operations, incurring additional costs for cleanup of hazardous substances, payment of penalties for discharge of pollutants, and post-mining reclamation and bonding, all of which could have an adverse impact on our financial performance and results of operations.

There is no assurance that future changes in environmental regulation, if any, will not adversely affect our operations. Environmental hazards may exist on the properties on which we hold interests which are unknown to us at present and which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of the properties, and which may result in the payment of fines and clean-up costs by us and may adversely affect our operations.

We cannot give any assurances that breaches of environmental laws (whether inadvertent or not) or environmental pollution will not materially and adversely affect our financial condition. There is no assurance that any future changes to environmental regulation, if any, will not adversely affect us.

Our activities are subject to environmental laws and regulations that may increase our costs of doing business and restrict our operations.

All phases of our operations are subject to environmental regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate, certain of which regulations are set forth below. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which may result in stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. These laws address emissions into the air, discharges into water, management of waste, management of hazardous substances, protection of natural resources, antiquities and endangered species and reclamation of lands disturbed by mining operations. The costs associated with compliance with such laws and regulations are substantial. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations and future changes in these laws and regulations may require significant capital outlays and may cause material changes or delays in our operations and future activities. It is possible that future laws, regulations, or more restrictive interpretations of current laws and regulations by governmental authorities could have a significant adverse impact on our properties or some portion of our business, causing us to re-evaluate those activities at that time.

U.S. Federal Laws

CERCLA, and comparable state statutes, impose strict, joint and several liabilities on current and former owners and operators of sites and on persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances found at such sites. It is not uncommon for the government to file claims requiring cleanup actions, for reimbursement for government-incurred cleanup costs, or for natural resource damages, or for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by hazardous substances released into the environment. RCRA, and comparable state statutes, govern the disposal of solid waste and hazardous waste and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for noncompliance, as well as requirements for corrective actions. CERCLA, RCRA and comparable state statutes can impose liability for clean-up of sites and disposal of substances found on exploration, mining and processing sites long after activities on such sites have been completed.

CAA, as amended, restricts the emission of air pollutants from many sources, including mining and processing activities. Our mining operations may produce air emissions, including fugitive dust and other air pollutants from stationary equipment, storage facilities and the use of mobile sources such as trucks and heavy construction equipment, which are subject to review, monitoring and/or control requirements under the CAA and state air quality laws. New facilities may be required to obtain permits before work can begin, and existing facilities may be required to incur capital costs in order to remain in compliance. In addition, permitting rules may impose limitations on our production levels or result in additional capital expenditures in order to comply with the rules.

NEPA requires federal agencies to integrate environmental considerations into their decision-making processes by evaluating the environmental impacts of their proposed actions. If a proposed action could significantly affect the environment, the agency must prepare a detailed statement known as an EIS, which in addition to assessing environmental impacts, it must also analyze cumulative impacts and alternatives to the proposed actions. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), other federal agencies, and any interested third parties will review and comment on the scoping of the Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) and the adequacy of and findings set forth in the draft and final EIS. This process can cause delays in the issuance of required permits or result in changes to a project to mitigate its potential environmental impacts, which can in turn impact the economic feasibility of a proposed project. NEPA only applies to activities on public lands managed by a public land management agency like the BLM. It does not apply to projects on state- or privately held land, but some states have comparable state statutes with analogous risk.

CWA, and comparable state statutes, impose restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants into waters of the USA. The discharge of pollutants into regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the terms of a permit issued by the EPA or an analogous state agency. The CWA regulates storm water from mining facilities and requires a storm water discharge permit for certain activities. Such permits require the regulated facility to monitor and sample storm water run-off from its operations. The CWA and regulations implemented thereunder also prohibit discharges of dredged and fill materials in wetlands and other waters of the U.S. unless authorized by an appropriately issued permit. The CWA and comparable state statutes provide for civil, criminal and administrative penalties for unauthorized discharges of pollutants and impose liability on parties responsible for those discharges for the costs of cleaning up any environmental damage caused by the release and for natural resource damages resulting from the release.

SDWA and the Underground Injection Control (“UIC”) program promulgated thereunder, regulate the drilling and operation of subsurface injection wells. The EPA directly administers the UIC program in some states and in others the responsibility for the program has been delegated to the state. The program requires that a permit be obtained before drilling a disposal or injection well. Violation of these regulations and/or contamination of groundwater by mining-related activities may result in fines, penalties, and remediation costs, among other sanctions and liabilities under the SDWA and state laws. In addition, third party claims may be filed by landowners and other parties claiming damages for alternative water supplies, property damages and bodily injury.

ESA requires federal agencies to consider the conservation of threatened or endangered plant and/or animal species and the impacts to those habitats in which they are found in their decision - making processes. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”) Fisheries Service, and comparable state agencies, are responsible to ensure that the actions they authorize, fund, or carry out are not likely to adversely impact the continued existence of any listed species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitats required for species survival.

The National Historic Preservation Act protects the presence of historical or archeological sites on public lands as important public resources. It obliges federal land management agencies to preserve the historic, scientific, commemorative, and cultural values of the archaeological and historic sites and structures on these lands for present and future generations. The law requires that cultural resource surveys be completed on all land prior to disturbance by project activities. Where cultural resources are identified, such resources must be catalogued, and the data adequately recorded by qualified personnel prior to land disturbance. Significant cultural resource finds may require complete avoidance or systematic data recovery and relocation programs.

Nevada State Laws:

At the state level, mining operations in Nevada are primarily regulated by the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Protection. Bureaus within this Division require mine operators to hold valid Air, Water Pollution Control, and Reclamation Permits, which dictate operating controls and closure and post-closure requirements directed at protecting air, water, and land. We must also post financial assurances to assure the reclamation of significant land disturbances.

Other Nevada regulations govern operating and design standards for the construction and operation of any source of air contamination and landfill operations. Any changes to these laws and regulations could have an adverse impact on our financial performance and results of operations by, for example, requiring changes to operating constraints, technical criteria, fees or surety requirements.

Oregon State Laws:

The Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (“DOGAMI”) is the Lead Facilitating Agency for mine permitting and provides coordination, accountability, and mediates any disagreements between other involved agencies. These other agencies include Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (“DEQ”), Oregon Water Resources Department (“WRD”), Oregon Department of State Lands (“DSL”), Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (“ODFW”), Oregon Department of Agriculture (“ODA”), Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (“SHPO”) and Oregon Department of Land and Conservation Development (“DLCD”). Malheur County, within which the Stockade Mountain Project is located, may also require development and operating permits.

These agencies dictate operating controls and closure and post-closure requirements directed at protecting air, water, and land. Financial assurances to guarantee the reclamation of land disturbances must also be posted prior to initiating exploration, development, and production operations. Any changes to these laws and regulations could have an adverse impact on our financial performance and results of operations by, for example, requiring changes to operating constraints, technical criteria, fees or surety requirements.

Land reclamation requirements for our properties may be burdensome and expensive.

Although variable depending on location and the governing authority, land reclamation requirements are generally imposed on mineral exploration companies (as well as companies with mining operations) in order to minimize long term effects of land disturbance.

Reclamation may include requirements to:

In order to carry out reclamation obligations imposed on us in connection with our potential development activities, we must allocate financial resources that might otherwise be spent on further exploration and development programs. We plan to set up a provision for our reclamation obligations on our properties, as appropriate, but this provision may not be adequate. If we are required to carry out unanticipated reclamation work, our financial position could be adversely affected.

We face intense competition in the mining industry.

The mining industry is highly competitive in all its phases, both domestically and internationally. Our ability to acquire properties and develop mineral resources and reserves in the future will depend not only on our ability to develop our present properties, but also on our ability to select and acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for mineral exploration, of which there is a limited supply. We may be at a competitive disadvantage in acquiring additional mining properties because we must compete with other individuals and companies, many of which have greater financial resources, operational experience, and technical capabilities than us. We may also encounter competition from other mining companies in our efforts to hire experienced mining professionals. Competition could adversely affect our ability to attract necessary funding or acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future. Competition for services and equipment could result in delays if such services or equipment cannot be obtained in a timely manner due to inadequate availability and could also cause scheduling difficulties and cost increases due to the need to coordinate the availability of services or equipment. Any of the foregoing effects of competition could materially increase project development, exploration, or construction costs, result in project delays and generally and adversely affect us and our business and prospects.

Regulations and pending legislation governing issues involving climate change could result in increased operating costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Climate change could have an adverse impact on our operations. The potential physical impacts of climate change on the operations of our business is highly uncertain and would be particular to the geographic circumstances in areas in which we operate. These may include changes in rainfall and storm patterns and intensities, water shortages, changing sea levels and changing temperatures. These changes in climate could have an impact on the cost of development or production on our mines and adversely affect the financial performance of our operations.

Regulations and pending legislation governing issues involving climate change could result in increased operating costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. A number of governments or governmental bodies have introduced or are contemplating regulatory changes in response to climate and its potential impacts. Legislation and increased regulation regarding climate change could impose significant costs on us, our venture partners and our suppliers, including costs related to increased energy requirements, capital equipment, environmental monitoring and reporting and other costs to comply with such regulations. Any adopted climate change regulations could also negatively impact our ability to compete with companies situated in areas not subject to such regulations. Given the emotion, political significance and uncertainty around the impact of climate change and how it should be dealt with, we cannot predict how legislation and regulation will affect our financial condition, operating performance and ability to compete. Furthermore, even without such regulation, increased awareness and any adverse publicity in the global marketplace about potential impacts on climate change by us or other companies in the natural resources industry could harm our reputation.

A shortage of equipment and supplies could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.

We are dependent on various supplies and equipment to carry out our mining exploration and, if warranted, development operations. The shortage of such supplies, equipment and parts could have a material adverse effect on our ability to carry out our operations and therefore limit, or increase the cost of, production.

Risks Related to our Common Shares

Our shares may not continue to be listed on the NYSE American LLC (“NYSE American”)

Failure to meet the applicable maintenance requirements of the NYSE American could result in our shares being delisted from the NYSE American. If we are delisted from the NYSE American, our shares may be eligible for trading on an over-the-counter market in the U.S. In the event that we are not able to obtain a listing on another U.S. stock exchange or quotation service for our shares, it may be extremely difficult or impossible for shareholders to sell their shares in the U.S. Moreover, if we are delisted from the NYSE American, but obtain a substitute listing for our shares in the U.S., it may be on a market with less liquidity, and therefore potentially more price volatility, than the NYSE American. Shareholders may not be able to sell their shares on any such substitute U.S. market in the quantities, at the times, or at the prices that could potentially be available on a more liquid trading market. As a result of these factors, if our shares are delisted from the NYSE American, the price of our shares is likely to decline. In addition, a decline in the price of our shares will impair our ability to obtain financing in the future.

We have never paid dividends on the Common Shares.

No dividends on the Common Shares have been paid by us to date. Investors in our securities cannot expect to receive a dividend on their investment in the foreseeable future, if at all. Accordingly, it is unlikely that investors will receive any return on their investment in our securities other than through possible common share price appreciation.

Our Articles designate the Supreme Court of BC, Canada and the appellate Courts therefrom as the exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings, which could limit a shareholder’s ability to choose the judicial forum for disputes arising with us.

Our Articles include a forum selection provision that indicates that the Courts shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for:

There is uncertainty as to whether the Courts or courts in other jurisdictions will enforce these forum selection clauses. The choice of forum provision may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes, which may discourage such lawsuits that might otherwise be to the benefit of shareholders.

We interpret the forum selection clauses in our Articles to be limited to the specified actions and not to apply to any actions arising under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act, including any derivative actions brought under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act, and we will not seek to enforce the forum selection clause in relation to such actions. Section 27 of the Exchange Act provides that U.S. federal courts shall have jurisdiction over all suits and any action brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder and Section 22 of the Securities Act provides that U.S. federal and U.S. state courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder.

If a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our Articles to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

You may experience dilution as a result of future issuances of Common Shares.

We believe that we are adequately financed to carry out our exploration and evaluation plans in the near term. However, financing the development of a mining operation through to production, should feasibility studies show it is recommended, would be expensive and we would require additional capital to fund development and exploration programs and potential acquisitions. We cannot predict the size of future issuances of the Common Shares or the issuance of debt instruments or other securities convertible into Common Shares in connection with any such financing. Likewise, we cannot predict the effect, if any, that future issuances and sales of our securities will have on the market price of the Common Shares. If we raise additional funds by issuing additional equity securities, such financing may substantially dilute the interests of existing shareholders. Sales of substantial numbers of Common Shares, or the availability of such Common Shares for sale, could adversely affect prevailing market prices for our securities and a securityholder’s interest in our business.

We are an “emerging growth company,” and cannot be certain if the reduced reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our Common Shares less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. Commencing in May 2022, we could be an emerging growth company for up to five years: however, circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if the market value of our Common Shares held by non - affiliates exceeds US$700,000,000, if we issue US$1,000,000,000 or more in non - convertible debt during a three - year period, or if our annual gross revenues exceed US$1,070,000,000. Absent the foregoing circumstances, we would cease to be an emerging growth company on the last day of the fiscal year following the date of the fifth anniversary of our first sale of common equity securities under an effective registration statement. Finally, at any time we may choose to opt - out of the emerging growth company reporting requirements. If we choose to opt out, we will be unable to opt back in to being an emerging growth company. We cannot predict if investors will find our Common Shares less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Common Shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Common Shares and the prices of our securities may be more volatile.

Any future issuances of debt securities, which would rank senior to our Common Shares upon our bankruptcy or liquidation may adversely affect the level of return you may be able to achieve from an investment in our Common Shares.

In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by offering debt securities or preferred stock. Upon a potential bankruptcy or liquidation, holders of our debt securities or preferred stock, and lenders with respect to other borrowings we may make, may receive distributions of our available assets prior to any distributions being made to holders of our Common Shares. Because our decision to issue debt securities or preferred stock in any future offering, or borrow money from lenders, will depend in part on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of any such future offerings or borrowings. Holders of our Common Shares must bear the risk that any future offerings we conduct or borrowings we make may adversely affect the level of return they may be able to achieve from an investment in our Common Shares, upon bankruptcy or otherwise.

The market price of our Common Shares is subject to numerous risks.

We have a limited trading history and may be considered a micro-cap or small-cap company. Securities of micro-cap and small-cap companies have experienced substantial price and volume volatility in the past, often based on factors unrelated to the financial performance or prospects of the companies involved or the value of the underlying assets. These factors include macroeconomic developments and political environments in North America and globally and market perceptions of the attractiveness of particular industries. There is no assurance that the price of the Common Shares will be unaffected by any such volatility. The price of the Common Shares is also likely to be significantly affected by short-term changes in mineral and commodity prices or in our financial condition and results of operations as reflected in our financial statements. Other factors unrelated to our performance that may have an effect on the price of the Common Shares include the following: (i) the extent of analytical coverage available to investors concerning our business may be limited if investment banks with research capabilities do not follow our securities; (ii) lessening in trading volume and general market interest in our securities may affect an investor’s ability to trade significant numbers of Common Shares; (iii) the size of our public float may limit the ability of some institutions to invest in our securities; (iv) a substantial decline in the price of the Common Shares that persists for a significant period of time could cause our securities, if listed on an exchange, to be delisted from such exchange, further reducing market liquidity; and (v) the sale of securities by major shareholders.

As a result of any of these factors, the market price of the Common Shares at any given point in time may not accurately reflect our long-term value and our shareholders may experience capital losses as a result of their investment in our business. Securities class action litigation often has been brought against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. We may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and damages and divert management’s attention and resources.

General Risks

Proposed legislation in the U.S. Congress, including changes in U.S. tax law such as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 may adversely impact us and the value of our Common Shares.

Changes to U.S. tax laws (which changes may have retroactive application) could adversely affect us or holders of our Common Shares. In recent years, many changes to U.S. federal income tax laws have been proposed and made, and additional changes to U.S. federal income tax laws are likely to continue to occur in the future.

The U.S. Congress is currently considering numerous items of legislation which may be enacted prospectively or with retroactive effect, which legislation could adversely impact our financial performance and the value of our Common Shares. Additionally, states in which we operate or own assets may impose new or increased taxes. If enacted, most of the proposals would be effective for the current or later years. The proposed legislation remains subject to change, and its impact on us and holders of our Common Shares is uncertain.

In August 2022, U.S. President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act (“IRA”) into law. The IRA includes provisions that impact the U.S. federal income taxation of corporations. Among other items, this legislation includes provisions that impose a minimum tax on the book income of certain large corporations and an excise tax on certain corporate stock repurchases that are imposed on the corporation purchasing such stock. We cannot predict how this legislation or any future changes in tax laws might affect us or holders of our Common Shares.

Our properties and operations may be subject to litigation or other claims.

We may become involved in disputes with other parties in the future which may result in litigation. The results of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty. If we are unable to resolve these disputes favorably, it may have a material adverse impact on our ability to carry out our business plan.

Our business is affected by the global economy.

Recent global financial conditions have been characterized by increased volatility and access to public financing, particularly for junior mineral exploration companies, has been negatively impacted. These conditions, which include potential disruptions due to a U.S. Government shutdown, may affect our ability to obtain equity or debt financing in the future on terms favorable to us or at all. If such conditions continue, our operations could be negatively impacted.

There is uncertainty as a result of international conflicts

International conflict and other geopolitical tensions and events, including war, military action, terrorism, trade disputes and international responses thereto have historically led to, and may in the future lead to, uncertainty or volatility in global commodity and financial markets and supply chains. The outbreak of hostilities in Ukraine and Israel, and the accompanying international response including economic sanctions, has been extremely disruptive to the world economy, with increased volatility in commodity markets, and international trade and financial markets, all of which have a trickle - down effect on supply chains, equipment and construction. There is substantial uncertainty about the extent to which these conflicts will continue to impact economic and financial affairs, as the numerous issues arising from the conflicts are in flux and there is the potential for escalation of the conflicts in Europe, the Middle East and globally. There is a risk of substantial market and financial turmoil arising from the conflicts which could have a material adverse effect on the economics of our projects, and our ability to operate our business and advance project development.

Political uncertainty in the U.S. may have an adverse impact on our operating performance and results of operations.

General political uncertainty may have an adverse impact on our operating performance and results of operations. In particular, the U.S. continues to experience significant political events that cast uncertainty on global financial and economic markets, especially following the recent presidential election. It is presently unclear exactly what actions the second Trump administration in the U.S. will implement, and if implemented, how these actions may impact the mining industry in the U.S. Any actions taken by the Trump administration, including the many recent executive orders, may have a negative impact on the U.S. economy and on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Changes to U.S. tariff and import/export regulations may have a negative effect on our business and, in turn, harm us.

The U.S. has recently enacted and proposed to enact significant new tariffs. Additionally, President Trump has directed various federal agencies to further evaluate key aspects of U.S. trade policy and there has been ongoing discussion and commentary regarding potential significant changes to U.S. trade policies, treaties and tariffs. There continues to exist significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the U.S. and other countries with respect to such trade policies, treaties and tariffs. These developments, or the perception that any of them could occur, may have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets, and may significantly reduce global trade and, in particular, trade between the impacted nations and the U.S. Any of these factors could depress economic activity and restrict our access to suppliers or customers and have a material adverse effect on their business, financial condition and results of operations, which in turn would negatively impact us.

ITEM 4 - INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A. History and Development of the Company

Name, Address and Incorporation

The Company was incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (BC) on April 21, 2020. The Company is domiciled in Canada and maintains a head office in Vancouver, BC, Canada. The Company has no maximum authorized share capital and no par value.

Our principal executive offices are located at 1021 West Hastings Street, 9th Floor, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6E 0C3, and our telephone number is 604-644-6579.

As at the date of this Annual Report, the Company’s securities trade on the NYSE American under the ticker “AUST”.

Intercorporate Relationships

The Company has one wholly owned subsidiary, Austin American Corporation (“Austin NV”), a Nevada corporation which was incorporated in June 2020.

Significant Events and Highlights

2022 Highlights

2023 Highlights

2024 Highlights

​

Project Spending

As of December 31, 2024, the Company has $4,077,474 (2023 – $2,280,490) of capitalized E&E expenditures on its mineral projects.

Available Information

The SEC maintains an internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains report, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. Such information can also be found on the Company’s website (https://austin.gold).

B. Business Overview

Description of Our Business

The Company is a gold exploration company focused on gold targets and making district-scale gold discoveries in Nevada, USA and Oregon, USA. The Company’s Kelly Creek Project (as described herein) is a mineral exploration project located on the Battle Mountain-Eureka (Cortez) gold trend in Humboldt County, Nevada, USA. Upon developing an understanding of the prospect of discovering deposits of precious or base metals on the property, the Company entered into the Kelly Creek letter of intent on May 29, 2020. Thereafter, as described further herein, we entered into an Exploration and Option to Enter Joint Venture Agreement (“JV Agreement”).

To increase the opportunity for economic success, the Company obtained options to acquire four additional mineral exploration projects, two of which were subsequently drilled and the option agreements terminated (i.e. Fourmile Basin and Miller projects). The two projects retained and currently being explored by the Company are the Lone Mountain Project, located on the Independence-Jerritt Canyon gold trend in Elko County, Nevada and the Stockade Mountain Project, located in Malheur County, Oregon.

Competitive Conditions

The mining business is competitive in all phases of exploration, development and production. The Company competes with a number of other exploration and mining companies in the search for, and acquisition of, mineral properties, many of whom have greater financial resources. As a result of this competition, the Company may be unable to acquire attractive mineral properties in the future on terms it considers acceptable. The Company also competes for financing with other resource companies, many of whom have greater financial resources and/or more advanced properties. There can be no assurance that additional capital or other types of financing will be available if needed or that, if available, the terms of such financing will be favorable to the Company.

The ability of the Company to acquire properties largely depends on its success in exploring and developing its present properties and on its ability to select, acquire and bring to production suitable properties or prospects for mineral exploration and development. The Company may compete with other exploration and mining companies for the procurement of equipment and for the availability of skilled labor. Factors beyond the control of the Company may affect the marketability of minerals mined or discovered by the Company. Refer to the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report.

Industry and Economic Factors That May Affect Our Business

The Company’s mineral properties currently consist primarily of mineral leases and options with third parties for unpatented mining claims located on lands administered by the BLM, the Nevada State Office and the Oregon State Office to which the Company’s optionors only have possessory title of the mineral rights. Because title to unpatented mining claims is subject to inherent uncertainties, it is difficult to determine conclusively the ownership of such claims. These uncertainties relate to such things as sufficiency of mineral discovery, proper location and posting and marking of boundaries, proper and timely payment of annual BLM claim maintenance fees, the existence and terms of royalties, and possible conflicts with other claims not determinable from descriptions of record.

The present status of these unpatented mining claims located on public lands allows the Company the right to mine and remove valuable minerals, such as precious and base metals, from the claims conditioned upon applicable environmental reviews and permitting programs. Subject to the permitting process, the Company is also allowed to use the surface of the land solely for purposes related to mining and processing the mineral-bearing ores. However, legal ownership of the land remains with the USA. The Company remains at risk that the mining claims may be forfeited either to the USA or to rival private claimants due to failure to comply with statutory requirements. Prior to 1993, a mining claim locator who was able to prove the discovery of valuable, locatable minerals on a mining claim, and to meet all other applicable federal and state requirements and procedures pertaining to the location and maintenance of federal unpatented mining claims, had the right to prosecute a patent application to secure fee title to the mining claim from the federal government. The right to pursue a patent, however, has been subject to a moratorium since October 1993, through federal legislation restricting the BLM from accepting any new mineral patent applications. If the Company does not obtain fee title to its unpatented mining claims, there can be no assurance that it will be able to obtain compensation in connection with the forfeiture of such claims.

Pending Federal Legislation that may affect the Company’s Operations

In recent years, members of the U.S. Congress have repeatedly introduced bills which would supplant or alter the provisions of the General Mining Act of 1872, a U.S. federal law that authorizes and governs prospecting and mining for economic minerals, such as gold, platinum, and silver, on federal public lands. Such bills have proposed, among other things, to either eliminate the right to a mineral patent, impose a federal royalty on production from unpatented mining claims, render certain federal lands unavailable for the location of unpatented mining claims, afford greater public involvement in the mine permitting process, provide for citizen suits, and impose new and stringent environmental operating standards and mined land reclamation requirements in addition to those already in effect. Such proposed legislation could change the cost of holding unpatented mining claims and could significantly impact the Company’s ability to develop mineralized material on unpatented mining claims. Currently, most of the Company’s mining claims are on unpatented claims. Although the Company cannot predict what legislative changes might occur, the enactment of these proposed bills could adversely affect the potential for development of its mining claims, the economics of any mines that it brings into operation on federal unpatented mining claims, and as a result, adversely affect the Company’s financial performance.

Rights under Mineral Leases and Options

We anticipate having to rely on financings through the issuances of Common Shares in order to continue to fund activities related to our commitments under our mineral leases and options. There are significant uncertainties in capital markets impacting the availability of equity financing for the purposes of mineral exploration and development. Certain uncertainties relating to the global economy, political uncertainties and increasing geopolitical risk, increased volatility in the prices of gold, copper, other precious and base metals and other minerals, as well as increasing volatility in the foreign currency exchange markets may also impact the Company’s business and our ability to raise new capital, and accordingly, may impact our ability to remain a going concern.

The Company’s operations are also exposed to various levels of regulatory, economic, political and other risks and uncertainties which may impact the Company’s business and our ability to raise new capital. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to comply with any changing regulatory, economic or political environment. Refer to the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report.

Government Regulation

The exploration and development of a mining prospect is subject to regulation by a number of federal and state government authorities. These include the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the BLM as well as the various state environmental protection agencies. The regulations address many environmental issues relating to air, soil and water contamination and apply to many mining related activities including exploration, mine construction, mineral extraction, ore milling, water use, waste disposal and use of toxic substances. In addition, we are subject to regulations relating to labor standards, occupational health and safety, mine safety, general land use, export of minerals and taxation. Many of the regulations require permits or licenses to be obtained and the filing of “Notices to Conduct Mineral Exploration Activities” (Notice level permit) and Plans of Operations, the absence of which or inability to obtain will adversely affect the ability for us to conduct our exploration, development and operation activities. The failure to comply with the regulations and terms of permits and licenses may result in fines or other penalties or in revocation of a permit or license or loss of a prospect.

Federal Government

On lands owned by the USA, mining rights are governed by the General Mining Law of 1872, as amended, which allows the location of mining claims on certain federal lands upon the discovery of a valuable mineral deposit and compliance with location requirements. The exploration of mining properties and development and operation of mines is governed by both federal and state laws. Federal laws that govern mining claim location and maintenance and mining operations on federal lands are generally administered by the BLM. Additional federal laws, governing mine safety and health, also apply. State laws also require various permits and approvals before exploration, development or production operations can begin. Among other things, a reclamation plan must typically be prepared and approved, with bonding in the amount of projected reclamation costs. The bond is used to ensure that proper reclamation takes place, and the bond will not be released until that time. Local jurisdictions may also impose permitting requirements (such as conditional use permits or zoning approvals).

On lands administered by the BLM, notice-level exploration permits are required to perform drilling or other surface disturbing activities with less than five acres extent. More extensive disturbance requires submittal and approval of a “Plan of Operations” and an “Environmental Assessment” or EIS from the BLM.

State Governments

If the Company is successful in the future at discovering a commercially viable mineral deposit on our property interests, then if and when we commence any mineral production, we will also need to comply with laws that regulate or propose to regulate our mining activities, including the management and handling of raw materials, disposal, storage and management of hazardous and solid waste, the safety of our employees and post-mining land reclamation.

Nevada

In Nevada, initial stage surface exploration activities that do not disturb the surface do not require any permits. We would also be required to post bonds with the State of Nevada to secure our environmental and reclamation obligations on private land, with the amount of such bonds reflecting the level of rehabilitation anticipated by the then proposed activities.

Oregon

Unlike Nevada, where earlier stage exploration activities such as drilling and roadbuilding on BLM lands do not require a state permit, Oregon does require a state permit and separate reclamation bonding. The Oregon DOGAMI is the Lead Facilitating Agency for mine permitting and regulation at the state level. Other state agencies that would become involved in the process include Oregon DEQ, Oregon WRD, Oregon DSL, Oregon ODFW, Oregon ODA, Oregon SHPO and Oregon DLCD.

These agencies dictate operating controls and closure and post-closure requirements directed at protecting air, water, and land. Financial assurances to guarantee the reclamation of land disturbances must also be posted prior to initiating exploration, development, and production operations. Any changes to these laws and regulations could have an adverse impact on our financial performance and results of operations by, for example, requiring changes to operating constraints, technical criteria, fees or surety requirements.

We cannot predict the impact of new or changed laws, regulations or permitting requirements, or changes in the ways that such laws, regulations or permitting requirements are enforced, interpreted or administered. Health, safety and environmental laws and regulations are complex, are subject to change and have become more stringent over time. It is possible that greater than anticipated health, safety and environmental capital expenditures or reclamation and closure expenditures will be required in the future. We expect continued government and public emphasis on environmental issues will result in increased future investments for environmental controls at our operations.

Environmental Regulation

The Company’s exploration and development activities, as well as any current or future operations, are subject to extensive governmental regulations for the protection of the environment, including regulations relating to air and water quality, mine reclamation, solid and hazardous waste handling and disposal and the promotion of occupational health and safety, which may adversely affect the Company or require it to expend significant funds in order to comply with such regulations. There is also a risk that environmental and other laws and regulations may become more onerous, making it more costly for the Company to remain in compliance with such laws and regulations, which could result in the incurrence of additional costs and operational delays or the failure of the Company’s business.

All phases of the Company’s operations in Nevada and Oregon will be subject to extensive federal environmental regulation, and to the state regulatory programs to which these federal requirements may have been delegated through state statutes, which may include:

These environmental regulations require the Company to obtain various operating approvals and licenses and also impose standards and controls relating to exploration, development and production activities. Nevada and Oregon state statutes and regulations also require that mining projects prepare an approved reclamation plan and establish financial assurance requirements for reclamation of mining operations upon completion of operations. Compliance with federal and state regulations could result in delays in beginning or expanding operations, incurring additional costs for cleanup of hazardous substances, payment of penalties for discharge of pollutants, and post-mining reclamation and bonding, all of which could have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial performance and results of operations. Refer to the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report. The Company maintains, and anticipates continuing to maintain, a policy of operating its business in compliance with all environmental laws and regulations.

Gold Price History

The price of gold is volatile and is affected by numerous factors, all of which are beyond our control, such as the sale or purchase of gold by various central banks and financial institutions, inflation, recession, fluctuation in the relative values of the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies, changes in global gold supply and demand, and political and economic conditions.

The following table presents the high, low and average AM and PM fixed prices in U.S. dollars for an ounce of gold on the London Bullion Market (source: www.lbma.org.uk/) over the past five years:

​

​

Cycles

Given the general weather conditions and exploration season in north central Nevada and south-eastern Oregon, the Company’s E&E expenditures on its mineral properties tend to be greater from April to December than in the rest of the year.

Mineral Projects

The Company is a gold exploration company focused on gold targets and making district-scale gold discoveries in the USA. The Company initially acquired an option to joint venture the Kelly Creek Project located on the Battle Mountain-Eureka (Cortez) gold trend in Humboldt County, Nevada.

The Company obtained options to acquire four additional mineral exploration projects, two of which were subsequently drilled and the option agreements terminated (i.e. Fourmile Basin and Miller projects). The two projects retained and currently being explored by the Company are located on the Independence-Jerritt Canyon gold trend in Elko County, Nevada (the Lone Mountain Project) and in Malheur County, Oregon (the Stockade Mountain Project).

The Company hired Robert Hatch (SME-Registered Member) of Volcanic Gold & Silver LLC, 80 Bitterbrush Road, Reno, Nevada, as the Company’s VP Exploration and he acts as the Company’s “qualified person” (“QP”) under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and sub-part 1300 of Regulation S-K (“S-K 1300”) under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to oversee the operations and disclosure for all of the Company’s mineral projects. Robert Hatch is a shareholder of the Company and is compensated and has been granted equity awards for his role as VP Exploration. Refer to the “QP” and “Item 6 – Directors, Senior Management and Employees” sections of this Annual Report for additional information related to his remuneration and equity holdings.

Below are brief descriptions of the properties. For additional information about the financial terms of the agreements and E&E expenditures incurred on the properties, refer to note 10 of our audited consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2024 and 2023 and for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 (the “Consolidated Financial Statements”).

Kelly Creek Project, Nevada, USA

On July 7, 2020, the Company entered into the JV Agreement on the Kelly Creek Project, through the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Austin NV with Pediment, a subsidiary of URZ (formerly NGE), whereby Austin NV may earn up to a 70% interest in the Kelly Creek Project. The project is located in Humboldt County, Nevada, and is situated on public lands administered by the BLM and on private lands. The Kelly Creek Project comprises 99 unpatented lode mining claims covering approximately 2.77 mi2 (7.16 km2) and approximately 5.49 mi2 (14.2 km2) of private land leased by Pediment. Barbara Carroll, C.P.G., as an independent consultant and QP, completed the Kelly Creek Technical Report which is available on the Canadian System for Electronic Data Analysis and Retrieval + (“SEDAR+”) at www.sedarplus.ca. The Kelly Creek Technical Report is referenced for informational purposes only and is not incorporated herein by reference.

The Kelly Creek Basin is situated along the Battle Mountain – Eureka Gold Trend and is bounded by multi-million-ounce gold deposits to the north (Twin Creeks, Getchell, Turquoise Ridge, and Pinson) and south (Lone Tree, Marigold, Trenton Canyon, Converse, Buffalo Valley, Copper Basin, and Phoenix), together representing more than 70 million ounces of gold along the periphery of the Basin. Despite its proximity to significant mineralization, the interior of the Kelly Creek Basin has seen limited systematic exploration activity to date because its bedrock is largely covered by post-mineral volcanic units and post-mineral alluvium.

A significant portion of the Kelly Creek Project lies within and under the Humboldt River and its floodplain, much of which is part of the National Wetlands Inventory managed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. The full impact of this wetlands designation for this part of the Kelly Creek Project is unknown. A preliminary review of permitting issues in this area indicates that there may be some additional challenges to permit development near the Humboldt River and its associated floodplain.

The Company has engaged professionals to review the geophysical data, the environmental mine permit issues, and to provide target evaluations for the Kelly Creek Project. Exploration work by the Company has included review of technical data, compilation of the exploration data in geographic information system (“GIS”) and three dimensional (“3D”) programs, review of environmental issues affecting the project, writing of the NI 43-101 report, evaluation of targets, logistical planning of the drilling program, and permitting of drill sites with the BLM.

During the third quarter of 2022, the Company conducted a limited drill program at the Kelly Creek Project to drill test beneath anomalous gold values encountered in shallow historical drill holes in an area of thin Quaternary alluvium cover. The program consisted of a total of 3,485 feet (1,062 meters) of rotary-RC drilling in four holes. Difficult drilling conditions, including large inflows of groundwater, prevented the holes from achieving a targeted depth of 1,500 feet (457 meters). All holes intersected rocks that may host gold mineralization similar to the deposits at the nearby Marigold and Lone Tree mines. The highest gold values returned were 0.087 g/t and 0.056 g/t in five-foot (1.5 meter) intervals.

On June 1, 2023, the Company gave notice to Pediment that it will drop certain leases and claim holdings within the Kelly Creek Project, as permitted by the option to enter joint venture agreement with amendments. The claims dropped represented approximately 60% of the original combined land holdings and included the claims under the Genesis agreement. The entire Tomera Ranch private property has been retained. As a result of the termination of certain leases and claim holdings, the Company incurred a write-off of E&E assets of $353,456 which was recorded in the statement of loss and comprehensive loss.

On June 3, 2024, the Company and Pediment agreed to amend the terms of the option to enter joint venture agreement. On June 6, 2024, as part of an underlying agreement within the Kelly Creek Project, the Company and Julian Tomera Ranches, Inc. agreed to the amend the terms of the mining lease agreement (the “Hot Pot Agreement”). For further details on the amended terms, refer to Note 10(a) of our annual consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.

The Company is monitoring nearby competitor activity in this current high gold price environment and continues to determine the best options for further exploration of the Kelly Creek Project.

Lone Mountain Project, Nevada, USA

On November 1, 2020, the Company, through its subsidiary Austin NV, entered into a mineral lease agreement with NAMMCO, a Wyoming General Partnership, for exploration and mining rights on 454 unpatented lode mining claims and six patented mining claims that comprise the Lone Mountain Property, Elko County, Nevada. On August 2, 2022, NAMMCO released its rights to the six patented mining claims and on August 3, 2022, the Company negotiated changes to the lease agreement on the Lone Mountain Project. In November 2023, the Company located additional mining claims at Lone Mountain which are not subject to the NAMMCO mineral lease agreement that brought the total area of the property up to approximately 21.0 mi2 (54.4 km2). In November 2024, the Company located additional mining claims at Lone Mountain which are not subject to the NAMMCO mineral lease agreement. The total area of the property as of December 31, 2024 is now approximately 26.5 mi2 (68.7 km2).

The property is situated in one of the major gold mining centers of Nevada, as it is located less than 20 miles (32 kilometers) northeast of the Carlin cluster of gold deposits and 10 miles (16 kilometers) south of the southern-most Jerritt Canyon deposits. Lone Mountain is accessible from the large regional mining hub of Elko by 31 miles (50 kilometers) of paved highway and 6 miles (10 kilometers) of dirt road.

Modern gold exploration began in 1965 around the time of the original Carlin discovery when Newmont drilled several shallow holes into gold-bearing jasperoids (silica-replaced limestone) on the north flank of Lone Mountain. Beginning in the 1960s, the Lone Mountain Property position was assembled by Kirkwood and Huber (principals of NAMMCO) and then leased to several mining companies over the years.

Geology at the Lone Mountain Project consists of a broadly folded sequence of Paleozoic lithologies that are intruded by a Tertiary age (36-42 Ma) multi-phase intrusive complex. Silurian to Devonian shelf carbonates form the lower plate and Ordovician off-shelf siliciclastic rocks form the upper plate of the low angle Roberts Mountains thrust fault.

Erosion plus basin and range block faulting has created the “Lone Mountain window”, which is now a broad, west-plunging antiform with an east-west trending axis. This window is similar to other gold mineralized windows in Nevada such as the Carlin Window - Gold Quarry Mine; Lynn Window – Carlin Mine; Bootstrap Window – Gold Strike Deposit; and Cortez Window – Cortez Hills. It is the lower plate carbonate rocks exposed in the windows that host significant “Carlin-Type” mineralization in these districts. The most intense and potentially most economically significant alteration occurs as jasperoid. Skarn and gossan alteration and mineralization occur close to the intrusive, typically with gold as well as silver and base metals in rocks and soils. The widespread jasperoid development is outboard from the intrusive and commonly is associated with gold and elements typical of Carlin-type sediment-hosted gold deposits (Sb, As, Zn) in the rocks and soils. This district-scale alteration zonation is typical of the Carlin-type districts in Nevada.

Large amounts of data collected by eleven exploration companies and NAMMCO over the past sixty years suggests potential for significant discovery and provides guidelines for future exploration. The Company, in coordination with its consultants, conducted numerous activities to design an initial exploration program for the Lone Mountain Project. These activities included a review of historical technical reports, compilation of exploration data, drafting of property maps and workup of the GIS data, and strategic planning for a forthcoming exploration program.

Although significant historical exploration has been conducted at Lone Mountain, large areas of the project remain untested, or minimally tested, by drilling. Historical soil and stream sediment sampling programs revealed areas with strongly anomalous arsenic, antimony and mercury in structurally complex zones that have not been drilled.

To follow up and expand on the historical data, the Company has completed a soil and stream sediment sampling program consisting of 2,027 soil and 122 stream sediment samples. Analytical results have been received and are being interpreted by consulting geologists. The results of these sampling programs, combined with historical results and gravity surveys conducted in 2023, will be used for gold deposit targeting.

Stockade Mountain Project, Oregon, USA

On May 16, 2022, the Company entered into a mineral lease agreement with BMR for exploration and mining rights on 261 unpatented lode mining claims that comprise the Stockade Mountain Project situated in Malheur County, Oregon. In November 2024, the Company located an additional 77 unpatented lode mining claims which brings the total area of the property to approximately 10.5 mi2 (27.22 km2).

The property is located approximately 50 miles (80 kilometers) southeast of Burns, Oregon and 90 miles (145 kilometers) southwest of Boise, Idaho in a rural area used for ranching and farming. The high-grade gold/silver Grassy Mountain Gold project, which is currently undergoing permitting for an underground mine and adjacent milling operation, is located in Malheur County about 40 miles (64 kilometers) northeast of Stockade Mountain. The nearby community of Burns, Oregon is a commercial center for ranching and farming and can supply the necessary accommodation, food, fuels, supplies, and some of the contractors and workforce for exploration and development.

Historical data generated within the project demonstrates the discovery potential for significant high-grade gold/silver mineralization that may be amenable to underground mining. Stockade Mountain exhibits a classic large gold- and silver-bearing low-sulfidation “hot springs” hydrothermal system associated with rhyolite intrusion and doming that formed along a major NW-trending structural corridor. Gold/silver and high-level mercury mineralization at Stockade is associated with widespread silicification and argillization in a near-surface paleo-hot springs environment. This hydrothermal alteration and mineralization formed in and around rhyolite domes that have intruded gently dipping felsic tuffs. Erosion into the hydrothermal system has been minimal, resulting in the local exposure of probable hydrothermal craters and vents that indicate the paleosurface at the time of hot springs activity. Gold and silver, along with associated elements arsenic, antimony, and mercury, are all strongly anomalous at the surface, however, historical drilling shows that gold and silver values, and their extent, increase significantly with depth below the paleosurface. This is a common characteristic of high-grade gold/silver deposits in similar geological environments, including the previously mentioned nearby Grassy Mountain deposit in Oregon, the Midas, Sleeper, Hollister, National, and Fire Creek mines in Nevada, and numerous analogous deposits elsewhere in the world. The gold/silver veins being targeted at Stockade Mountain would have formed within the vertical zone of vigorous boiling of the hydrothermal fluids, and this is interpreted to have occurred approximately 600 to 1,200 feet (183 to 366 meters) below the surface.

Exploration programs conducted by BHP, Phelps Dodge and Placer Dome in the 1980s and 90s included shallow exploration holes that were drilled for bulk tonnage, open-pit potential, with no efforts to target deeper high-grade gold/silver vein deposits. Many of these short drill holes returned significant lengths of strongly anomalous gold mineralization, including long intercepts of >0.2 g/t of gold. Four holes drilled higher-grade intercepts of:

The property had been dormant since the mid-1990s and was rediscovered by BMR during an eastern Oregon reconnaissance exploration program. There has been a considerable amount of work done on the property in the past and BMR has compiled a large amount of data for Stockade Mountain including:

The project is an exploration stage project, and there are no known mineral resources or reserves on the project at this time. The Company has initiated a systematic exploration program to include drilling beneath the known high-level gold/silver-bearing stockworks mineralization that will target high grade vein deposits formed deeper into the hydrothermal boiling zone along feeder conduits. Similar to the Company’s other projects, Robert M. Hatch conducted data compilation, field review, permitting, and other activities associated with exploration of the Stockade Mountain Project.

During the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company received approval from the BLM to build access roads and drill exploration holes to test the above-described targets. Exploration activity in Oregon that creates disturbances also requires approval of an Exploration Permit through the Oregon DOGAMI, and this permit was approved in the third quarter of 2023. As a result, all permits necessary to construct access roads and initiate drilling were in hand.

On November 2, 2023, the Company announced a diamond drilling program at the Stockade Mountain Project designed to test beneath the known high-level gold/silver-bearing stockworks mineralization for high-grade vein deposits formed deeper in the hydrothermal system. This is the first known use of diamond drilling on the property, which will allow the Company to have a better understanding of the host rocks and mineralization.

The 2023 drilling program began testing what has been historically known as the “Number 9 Vein” area in the central part of the Company’s land package. Gold values from surface outcrops of the vein are weak, with a high value of 0.013 g/t. However, the historical drilling indicates that significant thicknesses of stockwork mineralization begin just below the surface and extend at least 1,250 feet (380 meters) eastward from the exposed vein zone and 2,300 feet (700 meters) along strike. The hypothesized high-grade gold/silver veins at Stockade Mountain would have formed within a vertical zone of vigorous boiling of the hydrothermal fluids near the base of and below the stockworks.

The Company’s diamond drilling program consisted of three diamond drillholes totaling 2,435.9 feet (742.5 meters). The Company announced the gold assay results from the first two drillholes at its Stockade Mountain Project on January 30, 2024. These holes confirm that the mineralizing system at Stockade Mountain is robust and contains significant gold grades, with the strongest intercept of 8.19 g/t over 4 feet (1.2 meters) and several other gold intercepts of interest. Results from the third and last drill hole of the program, SM-24-04, were announced on March 25, 2024 and include a gold intercept of 9.32 g/t over 2.7 feet (0.82 meters). These results continue to demonstrate the strength of the hydrothermal system and the potential for significant gold mineralization within the project area.

Extremely wet and muddy conditions due to significant rain, snow and an unusually warm winter caused substantial difficulties and delays while drilling the third hole. The Company shut down the drill program due to permitting restrictions and excessive disturbance caused by the drilling activity.

Due to the long access roads and the 5-acre disturbance limitation under the BLM Notice level exploration permit, the Company is undertaking a Plan of Operations using an environmental consultant to allow for greater flexibility for drill site locations and access.

The Company is planning an RC drill program in 2025 to follow-up on gold mineralization encountered during the 2023-2024 winter drilling program. The Company’s drilling program will be designed to test beneath known high-level gold/silver-bearing stockwork mineralization for high-grade vein deposits formed deeper in the hydrothermal system. All permits are in place to conduct the program, which will be subject to suitable drill availability and weather.

Miller Project, Nevada, USA

On February 1, 2021, the Company entered into a mineral lease and option agreement with Shea Clark Smith and Gregory Maynard for exploration and mining rights and access to certain mineral claims on the Miller Project situated in Elko County, Nevada.

The Company received approval from the BLM for a “Notice to Conduct Mineral Exploration Activities” for its initial drilling program. The program commenced in late July 2023.

On September 20, 2023, the Company received gold assay results for the drilling program at its Miller Project. Four holes totaling 6,565 feet (2,001 meters) were drilled to target Carlin-type gold mineralization in Paleozoic sedimentary rocks hypothesized to occur beneath Quaternary gravels and Tertiary volcanic rocks. The primary purpose of this drilling program was to determine if suitable Carlin-type host rocks occurred at reasonable depth in areas with gold and multi-element biogeochemical anomalies. Two of the holes encountered the Paleozoic sedimentary rock section at depths of 985 feet (300 meters) and 940 feet (286.5 meters) respectively that may include the suitable host rocks, whereas two of the holes were ended in Tertiary volcanics at depths of 1,800 feet (548.6 meters) and 1,545 feet (470.9 meters) respectively. Some of the sample intervals in the Paleozoic rocks contained detectable gold up to 0.027 g/t, whereas a high value of 0.116 g/t gold was returned in volcanic rocks interpreted to be Eocene in age.

On December 18, 2023, the Company terminated the mineral lease and option agreement for the Miller Project. As a result of the termination of the mineral lease and option agreement, for the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company incurred a write-off of E&E assets of $897 (2023 – $1,015,468) which was recorded in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss.

Fourmile Basin Project, Nevada, USA

On June 18, 2020, the Company entered into a mineral lease agreement with La Cuesta International, Inc. (“LCI”) for exploration and mining rights and access to certain mineral claims on the Fourmile Basin Project situated in Nye County, Nevada.

During the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company received approval from the BLM to drill exploration holes in the southern portion of the project area. The exploration target was the hypothesized buried source of gold and silver mineralized boulders and float that are concentrated in a 5.5 mile (8.9 kilometer) long zone along the east side of Fourmile Basin. The Company completed its initial drilling program in January 2023 which consisted of five holes totaling 4,580 feet (1,396 meters). Analytical results for gold were received, with high values being 0.106 and 0.065 g/t gold.

On April 13, 2023, the Company terminated the mineral lease and option agreement for the Fourmile Basin Property. As a result of the termination of the mineral lease and option agreement, for the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company incurred a write-off of E&E assets of $3,393 (2023 – $883,862) which was recorded in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss.

C. Organizational Structure

The Company has the following organizational structure as at March 27, 2025:

Austin NV

On June 29, 2020, Austin NV was incorporated in Nevada, USA for operation of its mineral projects in the USA.

D. Property, Plant and Equipment and E&E Assets

Summary of Mineral Properties

The Company is an exploration stage issuer and currently has interests in three gold exploration properties, two located in the state of Nevada, including the Kelly Creek Project and the Lone Mountain Project, and one located in the state of Oregon, the Stockade Mountain Project.

Mineral Property Locations

Figure 1:

Ownership Interests

In total, the Company’s mineral projects cover 45.3 mi2 (117.3 km2) in the aggregate, consisting of a mix of 1,388 unpatented mining claims either leased with option to purchase, joint ventured, or owned outright by the Company and private property leases.

QP

The disclosure in this Annual Report of scientific and technical information regarding exploration results for the Kelly Creek Project has been reviewed and approved by Barbara Carroll, who is a QP under S-K 1300. Ms. Carroll is an independent consulting geologist.

The disclosure in this Annual Report of scientific and technical information regarding exploration results for the mineral properties of the Company, except for the Kelly Creek Project, has been reviewed and approved by Robert Hatch, VP Exploration of the Company, who is a QP under S-K 1300.

As VP Exploration of the Company, Robert Hatch is compensated US$15,000 per month and has been granted the following options:

Internal Controls

Our properties are all at an early stage of exploration, with no reserves, resources, or surface samples or drill penetrations that could be construed as being a potentially economic discovery. When conducting exploration that involves drilling, sampling, assaying, and the reporting of results from those activities, we have established sampling and analytical QA/QC protocols consistent with industry standards. These protocols will include, but are not limited to:

Kelly Creek Project, Nevada, USA

Figure 2:

Project Location and Access

The project area is located in the Kelly Creek Basin, in southeastern Humboldt County, Nevada, 22 miles (35.4 kilometers) northwest of Battle Mountain, Nevada (population ~7,396), 0.5 miles (0.8 kilometers) north of Valmy, Nevada, and 32 miles (51.5 kilometers) east of Winnemucca, Nevada. The approximate geographic center of the property is 40.9216 North latitude by 117.10925 West longitude (WGS84), or in NAD 27, U.T.M. Zone 11S at 490,880.80 m East by 4,529,859.36 m North.

The south end of the Kelly Creek Project can be readily accessed from Winnemucca, Nevada approximately 38 miles east on I-80 to Valmy exit 216. Turn left onto Marigold Mine Road then turn left onto county gravel, and unimproved dirt roads with a travel time of about 35 minutes.

Project Stage

The project is an exploration stage project. There are no known mineral resources or reserves on the project. It is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a mineral resource. Historical exploration has been conducted on the property.

Local Resources and Infrastructure

The Kelly Creek property is situated in southeast Humboldt County, Nevada with significant resources in place to support the mining industry. Humboldt County itself is entirely rural, with one population center, Winnemucca, the county seat, located in the southeastern part of the county. Winnemucca is a historic ranching community which grew to support regional large-scale mining following the discovery of several substantial gold deposits in the 1980s.

The nearby towns of Winnemucca and Battle Mountain host the majority of the local workforce and have well developed infrastructure of stores and shops for supplies, restaurants, and motels. Contractor support, transportation, and general suppliers are all readily available in these communities as well as in Elko, which is located approximately 88 miles (142 kilometers) east of the project area and serves as a major hub for mining operations in northern Nevada.

There is no material infrastructure located on the property. There are a number of unimproved and 4-wheel drive vehicle accessible roads available to enable sufficient access to the entire project area.

There is no readily available year-round source of fresh water on the Kelly Creek property. Seasonal surface water may be available from the local drainages during the rainy season, but these sources are dry for most of the year. Fresh water required for future exploration may be pumped from surface and/or groundwater sources provided through purchase agreements with nearby ranches. The Company’s and previous drilling campaigns utilized water from the Marigold mine, and another possible water source is the fire station in Valmy.

Property Claims and Option

The Kelly Creek Project comprises 99 unpatented lode mining claims held directly by Pediment covering approximately 2.77 mi2 (7.16 km2); and approximately 5.49 mi2 (14.2 km2) of private land leased by Pediment.

The Company holds its interests in the Kelly Creek Project through its Nevada subsidiary Austin NV under the JV Agreement with Pediment dated July 7, 2020 and as amended March 3, 2021, May 3, 2023 and June 3, 2024. Under this third amendment, the Company may exercise the option to earn a 51% interest in the project by incurring a cumulative total of C$2,500,000 (in progress) of E&E expenditures on the project by June 30, 2027. The cumulative total includes E&E expenditures incurred on the project to date in the amount of $923,757.

During the earn in period, Austin NV will be the operator of the project.

Once the option to joint venture has been exercised to earn the 51% interest, the Company and Pediment will enter into a joint venture agreement based on the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation Exploration, Development and Mining LLC Model Form 5A LLC Operating Agreement.

The Company has the option to increase its participating interest by an additional 19% to a total of 70% by incurring an additional C$2,500,000 on E&E expenditures with no time limit, although the Company must continue to pay the underlying property lease payments and BLM and county fees to keep the properties subject to the joint venture in good standing.

There are minimum annual royalty payments required by the Company as part of an underlying agreement within the Kelly Creek Project. On June 6, 2024, the Company and Julian Tomera Ranches, Inc. agreed to amend the terms of the mining lease agreement (the “Hot Pot Agreement”). Under the sixth amendment, the Company is subject to the following minimum payments:

​

Any mineral production on the claims is subject to a 3.0% net smelter return royalty which can be reduced to 2.0% upon payment of $2,000,000. The Hot Pot lease and any additional property within 2.5 miles of the original boundary of the claims is also subject to 1.25% net smelter return royalty in favour of Battle Mountain Gold Exploration Corporation.

On June 1, 2023, the Company gave notice to Pediment that it would drop certain leases and claim holdings within the Kelly Creek Project, as permitted by the option to enter joint venture agreement with amendments. The claims dropped represented approximately 60% of the original claim holdings and included the claims under the Genesis agreement.

Geology

The Kelly Creek Project is located to the north of the Battle Mountain Mining district on the northern margin of the Battle Mountain-Eureka trend, a long-lived structural feature that localized intrusions and ore deposits of different types and ages, within the Basin and Range physiographic province, in northcentral Nevada.

The Kelly Creek Basin (informal name) is situated along the Battle Mountain-Eureka Gold Trend and is bounded by historical producing gold deposits to the north (Twin Creeks, Getchell, Turquoise Ridge, and Pinson) and south (Lone Tree, Marigold, Trenton Canyon, Converse, Buffalo Valley, Copper Basin, and Phoenix), along the periphery of the Basin. Despite its proximity to significant mineralization, the interior of the Kelly Creek Basin has seen limited systematic exploration activity to date because its bedrock is largely covered by syn- to post-mineral volcanic units and post-mineral alluvium.

The property itself is located several miles from the nearest outcropping of bedrock and is completely covered by sand and gravel. Gravity, air magnetic, seismic, and drill data all show the sand and gravel cover can be relatively shallow, with bedrock located several hundred feet deep over large areas. Rocks exposed in the ranges surrounding the gravel-filled basin show evidence of a long lived and complex metamorphic, sedimentary, volcanic, and igneous history, and the structural history is just as long-lived and complex.

Subsurface geology at the Kelly Creek Project area is inferred from the geology of the surrounding ranges and existing drill logs to consist of a thick section of i) lower Paleozoic deep marine sedimentary and volcanic rocks of the Roberts Mountains allochthon (probably the Valmy Formation), and ii) possible local occurrences of stratified units of the Mississippian to Permian Antler overlap. The section of Paleozoic rocks is unconformably overlain by a succession of Cenozoic rocks that includes: a) Paleogene tuffs and lavas, b) Miocene basin deposits, c) Pliocene basaltic rocks, and d) Pleistocene to Holocene alluvial deposits of the Humboldt River.

The structural framework underlying the project area is based on projections of major zones of high-angle structures northward from exposures along the range front to the south combined with detailed gravity, CSAMT, air magnetics, seismic geophysics, and drilling over the gravel-covered project area. A pronounced, elongate NNE gravity high underlying the project area is bounded on the west by a steep gravity gradient strongly suggesting an NNE continuation of the mapped mineralized structural fabric underlying the Marigold district. The pronounced structural fabric can be traced from the range-front exposures through the project area for 8 miles (12 kilometers). The eastern flank of the gravity high is bounded by a slightly shallower gravity gradient, but still suggestive of a broad underlying structural fault zone that may host mineralization. The gravel-covered fault zone can be inferred from projections of mapped exposed areas 4 miles (6 kilometers) to the south along the entire eastern edge of the project northward for 7 miles (11 kilometers) to connect to the interpreted structural features responsible for the Hot Pot hot springs based on the seismic geophysical work of Oski.

Based on the geological setting, hydrothermal alteration, anomalous in Au, Ag, As, Sb, and Hg values encountered in water and drilling samples, and close spatial association with known gold deposits peripheral to the basin, the Kelly Creek property has the potential to host sedimentary rock-hosted, disseminated gold deposit of either distal disseminated silver-gold deposits or Carlin-type carbonate-hosted gold-silver deposits.

There is no surface expression of alteration or mineralization present at the Kelly Creek property. Bedrock units known to support mineralization nearby at Lone Tree and Marigold were encountered by RC and core drill holes across the project area which intersected broad areas of bleaching and argillization anomalous in Au, Ag, As, Sb, Hg, Tl +/- Trace Cu, Pb and Zn commonly associated with Carlin-type hydrothermal systems. Oxidation extends to depths as great as 1,000 feet (300 meters) in several core holes.

Exploration History

Recognizing the potential to find significant gold mineralization within the Kelly Creek Basin, dozens of major and junior explorers have explored to follow the prospective geology seen in and proximal to the exposed bedrock in the surrounding mountain ranges beneath the sands and gravels covering the Basin. Within the areas controlled by Pediment, this activity has included: Santa Fe Pacific completing wide-spaced bedrock mapping drilling in the 1990s; BHP completing an extensive soil auger geochemistry program through the late 1990s; and Placer Dome completing a reconnaissance-scale RC program in the early 2000s. Other companies that either now hold or have held claims in the immediate area include Newmont, Barrick, AngloGold, Hemlo, Homestake, and Kennecott. The efforts of each company have added valuable information about the geology of the Basin; however, without a cost-effective tool to conduct basin-scale exploration beneath the valley cover, the exploration programs to date in the Kelly Creek Basin have predominantly consisted of unsystematic and uncoordinated efforts focused on relatively small areas.

Pediment has integrated the use of hydrogeochemistry with conventional exploration methods to evaluate the larger Kelly Creek Basin, and has identified a highly prospective area in the middle of the Basin along a portion of a structurally-controlled, shallow, covered bedrock high coincident with highly anomalous gold and associated trace-element chemistry in groundwater. Pediment and its exploration partners have completed major work programs, building a comprehensive exploration dataset to understand the geology beneath the Basin. This exploration dataset includes:

The structural framework underlying the project area is based on projections of major zones of high-angle structures northward from exposures along the range front to the south combined with detailed gravity, Controlled Source Audio-frequency Magnetotellurics (“CSAMT”) surveys, air magnetics, seismic geophysics and drilling over the gravel-covered project area. A pronounced, elongate north-northeast gravity high underlying the project area is bounded on the west by a steep gravity gradient strongly suggesting a north-north-east continuation of the mapped mineralized structural fabric underlying the Marigold district. The pronounced structural fabric can be traced from the range-front exposures through the project area for 8 miles (12 kilometers). The eastern flank of the gravity high is bounded by a slightly shallower gravity gradient, but still suggestive of a broad underlying structural fault zone that may host mineralization. The gravel-covered fault zone can be inferred from projections of mapped exposed areas 4 miles (6 kilometers) to the south along the entire eastern edge of the project northward for 7 miles (11 kilometers) to connect to the interpreted structural features responsible for the Hot Pot hot springs.

Surface Geochemistry

In 2005, Pediment completed soil geochemistry surveys at the Kelly Creek Project to detect the possible vertical migration of gold and associated trace elements from the underlying bedrock. An initial report on vapor phase and orientation soil geochemistry results from the Kelly Creek Project was completed in July 2005. Follow-up soil and soil gas sampling was completed in the last quarter of 2005. Pediment collected 562 soil samples along east-west traverses at 50 meter spacing along 11 east-west sample lines in anticipation of intersecting element expression in soils along northwest and north-south structural zones.

Hydrogeochemistry

From 2003 to 2016, Pediment completed a large-scale reconnaissance hydrogeochemistry sampling program across the Kelly Creek Basin to detect the possible vertical migration of gold and trace elements from the underlying bedrock into the water above.

From 2003 through 2006, Pediment compiled information on 43 public domain groundwater samples and sampled 60 existing groundwater access points via springs, streams, ponds, industrial wells, monitor wells, domestic wells, and stock wells for gold and 80 associated trace elements using ultra low-level mass spectroscopy.

From 2007 to 2012, Pediment used its GeoprobeTM equipment to complete a groundwater chemistry sampling program over a completely sand and gravel covered target area to test groundwater to further define anomalous concentrations of gold on the project area. A total of 142 vertical GeoprobeTM holes spaced on a 1,200 feet (400 meter) grid were completed to depths of approximately 131 feet (40 meters) across the project area. Holes were pushed to rejection depth which was variable depending on ground conditions and one sample was collected from the bottom of each hole. Over 300 field duplicates, method and lab blanks, low, medium, and high standards were sent to Activation Laboratories Inc. in Ancaster, Ontario, Canada for Ultra trace HR-ICP-MS analysis.

In 2016 Pediment used its proprietary Scorpion drilling equipment to collect an additional 550 groundwater samples from 62 holes positioned at 100 meter, 200 meter and 400 meter intervals along irregularly positioned east-west fences across the south half of the project.

Geophysics

Pediment used detailed gravity geophysics to provide information about the depth to bedrock across the property. Gravity data can suggest areas of strong changes in the relief or composition of the underlying bedrock, which can be indicative of underlying fault zones and alteration that often control the location of gold mineralization.

In 2008, gravity geophysics was used by Pediment to determine the relative depth to underlying bedrock at the Kelly Creek Project area by measuring the density contrast between 522 sample stations on a 200-meter grid.

In the spring of 2010, Pediment worked with Oski Energy to complete a detailed gravity geophysics survey at Kelly Creek. The survey included 1,100 new gravity stations on a 200 by 200-meter (650 x 650 foot) grid for a total of approximately 23 miles2 (60 kilometers2 covering the southern half of the Kelly Creek Project. The detailed gravity results were merged with 231 stations from a 1997 regional gravity survey completed for BHP minerals.

The surveys successfully identified significant areas where bedrock is believed to be shallow and delineated sharp changes in the slope of the underlying bedrock that coincided with the potential fault zones identified by seismic geophysics.

Pediment used seismic geophysics to identify deep-seated, steeply dipping fault zones that can be projected into the near surface environment. Major, high-angle structures are important since they provide a potential conduit or ‘plumbing’ system for potential gold-bearing, hydrothermal fluids to access near-surface areas and deposit gold.

In 2007, Optim completed two 2.5 mile (4 kilometer) east-west seismic geophysics lines for Pediment (URZ (formerly NGE)) seismic lines) across the property to test for deep-seated, steeply dipping faults. In 2011, Optim acquired five lines of seismic data totaling approximately 25-line miles at the Hot Pot Geothermal Prospect, as part of Hot Pot Geothermal LLC’s DOE Recovery Act project for processing. The program was successful in that the results show shallow bedrock, steeply dipping fault zones, clear geologic offsets along faults, and several horst and graben features. The seismic lines confirmed that the groundwater chemistry target is underlain by a structural fabric that could act as conduits for mineralization.

Drilling

Between 2005 and 2017, Pediment and JV partners drilled 93 holes on the Kelly Creek Project to explore and define mineralization. They also compiled a comprehensive database of historical and current drill hole information available in and peripheral to the Kelly Creek Basin. Drilling records and related information were used to assess: (1) depth to bedrock; (2) structures or faults in bedrock that may source potential mineralization; (3) bedrock that has been altered by hydrothermal fluids; and (4) anomalous concentrations of gold and associated trace elements in bedrock.

In 2005, Pediment completed nine widely spaced vertical RC drill holes on the Kelly Creek Project to examine the target’s underlying geology and its potential for mineralization. All nine drill holes successfully encountered hydrothermally altered bedrock containing anomalous gold and associated trace element chemistry. The widely spaced, shallow holes confirmed bedrock to range in depth from 100 feet (33 meters) to 370 feet (112 meters).

In 2008, Pediment completed ten shallow RC vertical holes at Kelly Creek to drill through alluvium and a short distance into bedrock to examine the property’s underlying geology and further explore the property’s potential for mineralization. All ten drill holes successfully encountered hydrothermally altered bedrock containing anomalous gold and associated trace element chemistry. Bedrock was covered by less than 275 feet (83 meters) of alluvium in seven of ten holes and less than 500 feet (152 meters) in the other three.

In 2009-2010 Enexco completed twelve core drill holes totaling 12,264 (feet) (3,738 meters), developing stratigraphic information, and testing for mineralized structures beneath the alluvial cover. Drilling encountered weak but widespread anomalous gold values within all holes, spread across an 8.8 square kilometer portion of the Tomera Ranch property.

Pediment’s 2016-2017 Scorpion drilling program consisted of 62 holes totaling 19,239 feet (5,864 meters), with an average hole depth of 312 feet (95 meters). The results of Scorpion sampling at Kelly Creek confirm that the enriched gold in groundwater seen in earlier programs is now supported by elevated gold and related geochemistry in both alluvium and bedrock, as well as increasing concentrations of gold in groundwater at depth.

Environmental Considerations

The southern portion of the Kelly Creek Project area lies within and under the Humboldt River and its floodplain, much of which is part of the National Wetlands Inventory managed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. The full impact of this Wetlands designation for this part of the Kelly Creek Project is unknown. In December 2020, the Company commissioned a preliminary review for recommendations on permitting future mining operations on the project. The preliminary review of environmental and permitting issues on this portion of the project indicates that an open pit mine there may be improbable or infeasible due to the water issues, but that an underground mine may be possible.

Exploration Drilling Program Completed by the Company

The Company completed a four-hole drilling program on the Kelly Creek Project in August 2022. Totaling 3,485 feet (1,062 meters) of rotary-RC drilling, the holes were designed to drill beneath anomalous gold values encountered in shallow historical drill holes in an area of thin Quaternary alluvium cover. Difficult drilling conditions, including large inflows of groundwater, prevented the holes from achieving a targeted depth of 1,500 feet (457 meters). All holes intersected rocks that may host gold mineralization similar to the deposits at the nearby Marigold and Lone Tree mines. The highest gold values returned are 0.087 g/t and 0.056 g/t in five-foot (1.5 meter) intervals.

For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company incurred $82,825 (2023 – $75,285) of E&E expenditures on the Kelly Creek project.

The Company is monitoring nearby competitor activity in this current high gold price environment and continues to determine the best options for further exploration of the Kelly Creek Project.

Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification

Barbara Carroll as the QP for this project, reviewed the historical Kelly Creek Project data, performed audits on the surface geochemistry, verified the historical drillhole database, attained an understanding of the extent of historical QA/QC procedures implemented, and visited the project site. The sampling methods, security, and analytical procedures used by the various operators of the Kelly Creek Project were adequate for an exploration stage project. Comparison of check assays on drill hole pulps against historic results show a strong correlation (94%) between the samples analyzed by American Assay Laboratories in 2016/2017 to the check analysis on the samples performed in 2020. While there were inconsistencies in the data provided to Barbara Carroll by URZ (formerly NGE), the QP is unaware of any significant risks or uncertainties that could be expected to affect the reliability of the exploration information presented in this Annual Report.

For the 2022 drilling program, 668 five-foot (1.5 meter) samples were collected, 16 of which were rig duplicates for QA/QC. Additionally, four analytical standards were submitted for a total of 672 samples. All samples were submitted to American Assay Laboratories in Sparks, Nevada, which is ISO 17025 Accredited. American Assay Laboratories inserted its own blanks and standards into the sample stream, per standard practice.

Lone Mountain Project, Nevada, USA

On November 1, 2020 (the “Effective Date”), the Company entered into a mineral lease agreement (“Mineral Lease and Option Agreement”) with NAMMCO, a Wyoming General Partnership for exploration and mining rights and access to 454 unpatented lode mining claims on the Lone Mountain Property situated in Elko County, Nevada. In November 2023, the Company located additional mining claims at Lone Mountain which are not subject to the NAMMCO mineral lease agreement that brought the total area of the property up to approximately 21.0 mi2 (54.4 km2). In November 2024, the Company located additional mining claims at Lone Mountain which are not subject to the NAMMCO mineral lease agreement. The total area of the property as of December 31, 2024 is now approximately 26.5 mi2 (68.7 km2).

Property Location and Access

Figure 3:

The Company’s Lone Mountain Project is located approximately 25 miles (40 kilometers) northwest of Elko, Nevada at the southern end of the Independence Mountains. The property is situated in one of the major gold mining centers of Nevada, as it is located 20 miles (32 kilometers) northeast of the Carlin trend, and 10 miles (16 kilometers) south of the southern-most Jerritt Canyon deposits. The claim package covers parts of Townships 37-38N, Ranges 53-54E. Lone Mountain is accessible from the large regional mining hub of Elko by 31 miles (50 kilometers) of paved highway and 6 miles (10 kilometers) of dirt road.

Project Stage

The project is an exploration stage project. There are no known mineral resources or reserves on the project at this time. There has been insufficient exploration on the project to estimate a mineral resource. It is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a mineral resource. Historical exploration has been conducted on the property.

To follow up and expand on the historical data, the Company has completed a soil and stream sediment sampling program consisting of 2,027 soil and 122 stream sediment samples. Analytical results have been received and are being interpreted by consulting geologists. The results of these sampling programs, combined with historical results and gravity surveys conducted in 2023, will be used for gold deposit targeting.

Local Resources and Infrastructure

The nearby town of Elko is a major hub city for exploration, development, and mining activities in Nevada. Accordingly, the project area is ideally situated to provide a local mining workforce and all infrastructure, contractor support, transportation, and suppliers that could be needed. Numerous hotels, motels, and restaurants are available for visiting workers as well.

Property Claims and Lease

The Lone Mountain Project consists of a total of 951 unpatented lode mining claims.

On September 15, 2020, the Company signed a Letter of Intent with NAMMCO (the “LOI”). The LOI contemplated that the agreement will be a lease with option to purchase 454 unpatented lode mining claims located in Elko County, Nevada.

On November 1, 2020, pursuant to the LOI, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with NAMMCO through Austin NV, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The agreement has a term of 10 years plus 10-year extensions so long as the minimum payments are paid. The owner will retain a 3% net smelter return royalty on the Lone Mountain Project. At any time, the Company can buy one-half percentage point of the royalty for $2,000,000, reducing the royalty from 3% to 2.5%.

The Company will have the option to purchase the entire interest in the Lone Mountain Project, except for the royalty, at any time during the lease or the lease extension once the Company has made a discovery of equal to or greater than 0.5 million ounces of gold (or equivalent in other metals) or completed a pre-feasibility study. If the Company elects to exercise the option to purchase, the Company must pay the owner $2,000,000. The purchase price shall be reduced by the pre-production payments paid to the date of purchase.

Pursuant to the agreement, the Company must make the following pre-production payments to NAMMCO:

​

Each cash pre-production payment shall be credited against the purchase price until the purchase price is paid in full, then the pre-production payments will be credited against the future production royalties as an advance royalty.

Effective April 29, 2021 and August 3, 2022, the parties signed amendments to the Lone Mountain definitive agreement. Pursuant to the amended agreement, the Company will be required to pay the annual claim maintenance fees, and fulfil the following minimum E&E expenditures on the property:

​

​

In November 2023 and 2024, the Company located a total of 497 additional lode mining claims at Lone Mountain which are not subject to the NAMMCO mineral lease and option agreement.

Geology

Lone Mountain is comprised of a broadly folded sequence of Paleozoic lithologies that are cored by a Tertiary age (36-42 Ma) multi-phase intrusive complex. Silurian to Devonian shelf carbonates form the lower plate and Ordovician off-shelf siliciclastic rocks form the upper plate of the low angle Roberts Mountain thrust fault.

Erosion plus basin and range block faulting has created the “Lone Mountain window”, which is now a broad west-plunging, antiform with an east-west trending axis. This window is similar to other gold mineralized windows in Nevada such as the Carlin Window - Gold Quarry Mine; Lynn Window – Carlin Mine; Bootstrap Window – Gold Strike Deposit; and Cortez Window – Cortez Hills. It is the lower plate carbonate rocks exposed in the windows that host significant “Carlin-Type” mineralization in these districts.

The oldest structures on the property are thrust faults associated with emplacement of the Roberts Mountains allochthon during the mid-Paleozoic Antler Orogeny. Ordovician Vinini upper plate overlies the younger Devonian to Silurian lower plate assemblage lithologies. On a district scale the strata dip north on the north side of the intrusion, south on the south side, and moderately to steeply to the west on the west side.

High angle structures are numerous, and several large district-scale faults are present:

Alteration is widespread and includes:

The most intense and potentially most economically significant alteration occurs as jasperoid. Skarn and gossan are also widespread. When viewed on a district scale the skarn-type alteration occurs close to the intrusive, typically with gold as well as silver and base metals in rocks and soils. The widespread jasperoid development is outboard from the intrusive and commonly is associated with gold and elements typical of Carlin-type sediment-hosted gold deposits (Sb, As, Zn) in the rocks and soils. This district-scale alteration zonation is typical of the Carlin-type districts in Nevada.

Exploration History

Some of the historical exploration activities disclosed below were conducted on adjacent or inlier properties not controlled by the Company. All historical data was provided by NAMMCO under the mineral lease and option agreement.

Historical production began in 1939 at the Rip Van Winkle Mine in the northwestern part of the property from hydrothermal veins, replacements and breccia deposits containing lead, zinc, silver and small quantities of gold. Operations ceased in 1949 after producing a recorded total of 538,823 ounces silver (16.8 tonnes), 4,028,512 pounds lead (1,827 tonnes), and 3,140,387 pounds zinc (1,424.5 tonnes).

Modern gold exploration began in 1965 around the time of the original Carlin discovery when Newmont drilled several shallow holes into gold bearing jasperoids on the north flank of Lone Mountain. Beginning in the 1960s the Lone Mountain property position was assembled by Kirkwood and Huber (principals of NAMMCO) and then leased to several mining companies over the years. A summary of exploration companies and their targets from the 1960s to 2006 is as follows:

​

Companies prior to 2006 for the most part focused exploration on small target areas and conducted surface mapping, soil and rock sampling, geophysical surveys (magnetic, gravity and IP), and drilling. Records indicate 179 exploration holes were drilled totaling 84,690 feet (2,581 meters).

Teck Cominco American Inc. was the first company to complete comprehensive data compilation and district-wide geochemistry and geophysical programs during their 2006 to 2008 leasehold. Beginning in 2006, Teck began a geologic compilation effort from which they created a complete digital data base that is functional in the GIS environment. This was followed by district-scale geological, geochemical, and geophysical (magnetic survey) programs. New geological mapping was completed if historical mapping was insufficient. Based on the preliminary results Teck planned 14 drill holes for the 2007 exploration year but only four of the holes were drilled due to the late start of their program. In 2008 Teck divested themselves of all gold projects, world-wide, and all data and the digital database were returned to NAMMCO with no further drilling.

A summary of exploration activity conducted up to 2008 is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 - Exploration Activity up to 2008

​

Global Geoscience Ltd. leased the property in 2012 and farmed it out to Osisko Mining Inc. (“Osisko”) who conducted geological mapping, surface geochemical sampling, ground magnetic surveys, gravity surveys, drilling and claim staking during 2012. The geochemical sampling programs included 2,196 soil samples, 209 stream sediment samples and 117 rock samples. Osisko completed 13 holes for a total of approximately 14,975 feet (4,565 meters) of RC drilling. At the South Jasperoid prospect, four holes targeted Carlin-style mineralization around structures and alteration defined by a detailed gravity survey. Three holes were completed at the Lone Mountain skarn and six holes were drilled in total at the Rip Van Winkle and Monarch prospects where breccia-hosted mineralization lies adjacent to and within bodies of quartz feldspar porphyry.

No further work was conducted on the property and it was released back to NAMMCO.

Exploration Program

Compilation and evaluation of previous exploration data by the Company indicates multiple areas with anomalous to significant gold and indicator elements in rock, soil, and drill hole samples. After negotiating an access agreement with private property owners, the Company began its exploration activities in 2023 with reconnaissance sampling and mapping followed by hiring a gravity geophysics contractor to augment existing gravity survey data. Interpretation by the Company’s geophysics consultant helped to refine areas for additional work in 2024, which included soil and rock sampling, geological mapping and additional geophysics techniques.

To follow up and expand on the historical data, the Company has completed a soil and stream sediment sampling program consisting of 2,027 soil and 122 stream sediment samples. Analytical results have been received and are being interpreted by consulting geologists. The results of these sampling programs, combined with historical results and gravity surveys conducted in 2023, will be used for gold deposit targeting.

Stockade Mountain Project, Oregon, USA

On May 16, 2022, the Company entered into a mineral lease agreement with BMR for exploration and mining rights and access to certain mineral claims on the Stockade Mountain Project situated in Malheur County, Oregon.

Project Location and Access

Stockade Mountain is located approximately 50 miles (80 kilometers) southeast of Burns, Oregon and 90 miles (145 kilometers) southwest of Boise, Idaho. The high-grade gold/silver Grassy Mountain Gold project, which is currently undergoing permitting for an underground mine and adjacent milling operation, is located in Malheur County about 40 miles (64 kilometers) northeast of Stockade Mountain.

Access to Stockade Mountain from Burns is via 29 miles (47 kilometers) of paved State Highway 78, 43 miles (69 kilometers) of good-graded county gravel roads, and about 15.5 miles (25 kilometers) of unimproved dirt roads, with a travel time of about 2.5 hours. Within the property, there are several 4-wheel drive vehicle accessible roads that enable access for exploration activities.

Figure 4:

Project Stage

The project is an exploration stage project. There are no known mineral resources or reserves on the project at this time. There has been insufficient exploration on the project to estimate a mineral resource. It is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a mineral resource. Historical exploration has been conducted on the property. The Company is pursuing an exploration program including additional drilling, sampling, assaying, environmental monitoring, review of historical data and related activities described below.

Local Resources and Infrastructure

Stockade Mountain is located in a rural area used extensively for ranching and farming. The nearby community of Burns, Oregon is a commercial center for these businesses and can supply the necessary accommodation, food, fuels, supplies, and some of the contractors and workforce for exploration and development. Ontario, Oregon, located 70 miles (113 kilometers) to the northeast is another significant commercial center in southeastern Oregon. The cities of Boise, Nampa, Caldwell and others in the “Treasure Valley” in adjacent Idaho can provide all necessary goods and services, including the international airport in Boise.

Property Claims and Option

The Stockade Mountain Project originally consisted of a total of 261 unpatented lode mining claims that covered an area of over 6,790 acres (2,748 hectares) on land administered by the BLM. In November 2024, the Company located an additional 77 unpatented lode mining claims which brings the total area of the property to approximately 10.5 mi2 (27.22 km2)

Under the terms of the agreement, the Company is subject to the following pre-production payments:

​

The Company is required to incur minimum E&E expenditures on the property of $30,000 by May 16, 2023 (completed). On February 28, 2024, the Company executed an amendment to the mineral lease and option agreement with BMR eliminating the requirement of 2,000 meters of drilling by May 16, 2024.

BMR will retain a 2.0% net smelter return royalty on claims owned by BMR and 0.25% net smelter return royalty on third-party claims acquired within the area of influence around the property. Payments to BMR totaling $10,000,000 in any combination of pre-production payments, production or minimum royalties will reduce the production royalties on wholly owned claims by 50% to 1.0%.

Geology

Stockade Mountain exhibits a classic large gold- and silver-bearing low-sulfidation “hot springs” hydrothermal system associated with rhyolite intrusion and doming that formed along a major NW-trending structural corridor.

Gold/silver and high-level mercury mineralization at Stockade is associated with widespread silicification and argillization in a near-surface paleo-hot springs environment. This hydrothermal alteration and mineralization formed in and around rhyolite domes that have intruded gently dipping felsic tuffs. Erosion into the hydrothermal system has been minimal, resulting in the local exposure of probable hydrothermal craters and vents that indicate the paleosurface at the time of hot springs activity. Gold and silver, along with associated elements arsenic, antimony, and mercury, are all strongly anomalous at the surface, however, historical drilling shows that gold and silver values, and their extent, increase significantly with depth below the paleosurface. This is a common characteristic of high-grade gold/silver deposits in similar geological environments, including the previously mentioned nearby Grassy Mountain deposit in Oregon, the Midas, Sleeper, Hollister, National, and Fire Creek mines in Nevada, and numerous analogous deposits elsewhere in the world. The hypothesized economic gold/silver veins at Stockade Mountain would have formed within the vertical zone of vigorous boiling of the hydrothermal fluids, and this is interpreted to have occurred approximately 600 to 1200 feet (183 to 366 meters) below the surface.

Exploration programs conducted by BHP, Phelps Dodge and Placer Dome in the 1980s and 90s included shallow exploration holes that were drilled for bulk tonnage, open-pit potential, with no efforts to target deeper high-grade gold/silver vein deposits. Many of these short drill holes returned significant lengths of strongly anomalous gold mineralization, with the best intercept being:

Numerous other drill holes returned long intercepts of >0.2 g/t Au, and four drilled higher-grade intercepts of:

Exploration History

The property had been dormant since the mid-1990s and was rediscovered by the vendors during an eastern Oregon reconnaissance exploration program. There has been a considerable amount of work done on the property in the past and the vendors have compiled a large amount of data for Stockade Mountain including:

Permitting

During the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company received approval from the BLM to build access roads and drill exploration holes to test the above-described targets. During the third quarter of 2023, the Exploration Permit application was approved by the Oregon DOGAMI to drill up to sixteen holes.

Drilling

The Company’s drilling program is designed to test beneath the known high-level gold/silver-bearing stockworks mineralization for high-grade vein deposits formed deeper in the hydrothermal system. On November 2, 2023, the Company announced drilling at the Stockade Mountain Project. This is the first known use of diamond drilling on the property, which will allow the Company to have a better understanding of the host rocks and mineralization.

The Company’s diamond drilling program consisted of three diamond drillholes totaling 2,435.9 feet (742.5 meters). The Company announced the gold assay results from the first two drillholes at its Stockade Mountain Project on January 30, 2024. These holes confirm that the mineralizing system at Stockade Mountain is robust and contains significant gold grades, with the strongest intercept of 8.19 g/t over 4 feet (1.2 meters) and several other gold intercepts of interest. Results from the third and last drill hole of the program, SM-24-04, were announced on March 25, 2024 and include a gold intercept of 9.32 g/t over 2.7 feet (0.82 meters). These results continue to demonstrate the strength of the hydrothermal system and the potential for significant gold mineralization within the project area.

Significant intervals are tabulated in the following table:

​

Drill hole SM-23-01 was designed to confirm the assays and understand the geology in historical rotary RC drill hole STKD-9. That hole intersected 260 feet (79.2 meters) of stockwork veining averaging 0.937 g/t gold from 150 to 410 feet (45.7 - 125 meters). In that same zone, the Company’s hole SM-23-01 penetrated 137.9 feet (42.1 meters) with a weighted average of 0.636 g/t gold, essentially confirming the historical drill hole results. The highest-grade interval is 4 feet (1.2 meters) averaging 8.19 g/t. The higher grade and longer overall interval in STKD-9 can be attributed to upgrading of the assays by washing away the clays in the samples by the rotary RC drilling method and therefore biasing the samples with the veining and silicified breccias that would carry the gold values.

Drill hole SM-23-02 was designed to target higher grade mineralization about 330 feet (100 meters) below the stockwork mineralization in SM-23-01 and STKD-9. Although significant stockwork mineralization was penetrated, it is apparent that either the Number 9 Vein as exposed in outcrop is not the main “feeder” for the widespread stockwork mineralization, or it has a dip and/or strike different from what was expected.

SM-24-04 was drilled due north from the site of SM-23-02 at an inclination of -72.5 degrees. Hydrothermal alteration and mineralization in the hole are exceptionally strong and the rock is completely oxidized to the bottom of the hole. Although the gold intervals reported above are not interpreted to be the targeted high grade “feeder” veins to the high level stockwork gold mineralization, geological indications are that they may occur at greater depth and in this general area.

Extremely wet and muddy conditions due to significant rain, snow and an unusually warm winter caused substantial difficulties and delays while drilling the third hole. The Company shut down the drill program due to permitting restrictions and excessive disturbance caused by the drilling activity.

Due to the long access roads and the 5-acre disturbance limitation under the BLM Notice level exploration permit, the Company is undertaking a Plan of Operations using an environmental consultant to allow for greater flexibility for drill site locations and access.

The Company is planning an RC drill program in 2025 to follow-up on gold mineralization encountered during the 2023-2024 winter drilling program. The Company’s drilling program will be designed to test beneath known high-level gold/silver-bearing stockwork mineralization for high-grade vein deposits formed deeper in the hydrothermal system. All permits are in place to conduct the program, which will be subject to suitable drill availability and weather.

ITEM 4A - UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 5 - OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

The following Operating and Financial Review and Prospects section is intended to help the reader understand the factors that have affected the Company’s financial condition and results of operations for the historical period covered by the financial statements and management’s assessment of factors and trends which are anticipated to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition and results in future periods. This section is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our Consolidated Financial Statements and the other financial information contained elsewhere in this document. Our Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). Our discussion contains forward-looking information based on current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives and intentions. Our actual results may differ from those indicated in such forward-looking statements.

A. Operating Results

Results of Operations

The following table contains selected annual financial information derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements, which are reported under IFRS Accounting Standards.

​

Year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023

Administrative expenses

For the year ended December 31, 2024, total administrative expenses were $3,412,440, an increase of $1,175,368 compared to the comparable period in 2023. The increase was due to higher investor relations and marketing, share-based compensation and management salaries and consulting fees. This was partially offset by lower listing and filing fees, insurance costs and professional fees.

Investor relations and marketing

For the year ended December 31, 2024, investor relations and marketing was $1,119,666, an increase of $886,311 compared to the comparable period in 2023. The increase was due to increased promotion, social media campaigns and marketing of the Company. In particular, the Company incurred $750,000 related to a direct mail and digital marketing campaign completed by i2i.

Share-based compensation

For the year ended December 31, 2024, share-based compensation expense was $911,261, an increase of $429,867 compared to the comparable period in 2023. The movement in share-based compensation expense is the result of the timing and number of share options and warrants granted during the periods and the vesting conditions and fair value attributed to those share options and warrants.

Management salaries and consulting fees

For the year ended December 31, 2024, management salaries and consulting fees were $631,476, an increase of $40,780 compared to the comparable period in 2023. The increase was primarily due to higher management salaries and consulting fees for its senior executives and increased headcount within the corporate function of the Company.

Listing and filing fees

For the year ended December 31, 2024, listing and filing fees were $68,359, a decrease of $88,399 compared to the comparable period in 2023. The decrease in fees was primarily due to the costs incurred with the NYSE American for the Company’s equity incentive plan and F-3 shelf prospectus filings in 2023.

Insurance

For the year ended December 31, 2024, insurance costs were $291,965, a decrease of $68,085 compared to the comparable period in 2023. The decrease in insurance costs was due to a lower premium for directors and officers insurance upon renewal of the Company’s policy.

Write-off of E&E assets

For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recognized a write-off of E&E assets in the amount of $4,290, a decrease of $2,248,496 compared to the comparable period in 2023. For the year ended December 31, 2024, this was related to reclamation expenditures incurred on the Fourmile Basin and Miller projects. The mineral lease and option agreements on both projects were terminated in 2023. For the year ended December 31, 2023, this was related to the termination of the Fourmile Basin and Miller project mineral lease and option agreements, in the amount of $1,899,330 and the notice to Pediment that the Company will drop certain leases and claim holdings within the Kelly Creek Project, in the amount of $353,456.

Interest and finance income

For the year ended December 31, 2024, interest and finance income was $338,912, a decrease of $154,831 compared to the comparable period in 2023. The decrease was primarily due to lower principal amounts invested and lower interest rates on reinvestment of short-term investments. Interest and finance income is primarily earned from the investment in short-term investments at fixed interest rates using the proceeds generated by the Company’s IPO in May 2022.

Net loss and comprehensive loss

For the year ended December 31, 2024, net loss and comprehensive loss was $3,078,731, a decrease of $921,940 compared to the comparable period in 2023. The decrease was primarily driven by a lower write-off on E&E assets partially offset by higher corporate administrative expenses and lower interest and finance income.

Year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022

Administrative expenses

For the year ended December 31, 2023, total administrative expenses were $2,237,072, an increase of $519,778 compared to the comparable period in 2022. The increase was the result of the Company operating as a publicly listed entity for the entire fiscal year in 2023 compared to the comparable period in 2022, in which the Company completed its IPO in May 2022.

Share-based compensation

For the year ended December 31, 2023, share-based compensation expense was $481,394, an increase of $318,766 compared to the comparable period in 2022. The movement in share-based compensation expense is the result of the timing and number of share options and warrants granted during the periods and the vesting conditions and fair value attributed to those options and warrants.

Insurance

For the year ended December 31, 2023, insurance costs were $360,050, an increase of $97,735 compared to the comparable period in 2022. The increase was due to the premium for directors and officers insurance which was initiated upon completion of the IPO in the second quarter of 2022.

Investor relations and marketing

For the year ended December 31, 2023, investor relations and marketing was $233,355, an increase of $88,110 compared to the comparable period in 2022. The increase was due to increased promotion, social media campaigns and marketing of the Company since the listing of the Company’s shares on the NYSE American.

Professional fees

For the year ended December 31, 2023, professional fees were $327,712, an increase of $31,467 compared to the comparable period in 2022. The increase was primarily related to an increase in the annual audit fees.

Management salaries and consulting fees

For the year ended December 31, 2023, management salaries and consulting fees were $590,696, a decrease of $25,457 compared to the comparable period in 2022. The decrease was primarily due to performance bonuses received on completion of the IPO partially offset by management salaries and consulting fees paid to senior executives and directors which commenced in the second quarter of 2022.

Listing and filing fees

For the year ended December 31, 2023, listing and filing fees were $156,758, a decrease of $8,079 compared to the comparable period in 2022. The decrease in fees was primarily due to the costs associated with the IPO in 2022 partially offset by fees, in the amount of $50,000, incurred with the NYSE American for the Company’s stock incentive plan.

Write-off of E&E assets

For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recognized a write-off of E&E assets in the amount of $2,252,786. This was related to the termination of the Fourmile Basin and Miller project mineral lease and option agreements, in the amount of $1,899,330 and the notice to Pediment that the Company will drop certain leases and claim holdings within the Kelly Creek Project, in the amount of $353,456.

Unrealized fair value loss on marketable securities

For the year ended December 31, 2023, unrealized fair value loss on marketable securities was $9,051, a decrease of $165,583 compared to the comparable period in 2022. The decrease was due to a smaller change in the share price of URZ (formerly NGE) in which the Company holds 89,240 common shares (post 25:1 share consolidation completed on February 15, 2023).

Foreign exchange gain

For the year ended December 31, 2023, foreign exchange gain was $4,650, a decrease of $635,674 compared to the comparable period in 2022. The decrease in foreign exchange gain was primarily related to the Company’s change in functional currency from CAD to USD as of December 31, 2022. The foreign exchange gain in 2022 was primarily related to the translation of USD denominated term deposits as the CAD weakened against the USD.

Interest and finance income

For the year ended December 31, 2023, interest and finance income was $493,743, an increase of $310,530 compared to the comparable period in 2022. The increase was primarily due to higher interest rates on reinvestment of short-term investments. Interest and finance income is earned from the investment in short-term investments at fixed interest rates using the proceeds generated by the Company’s IPO.

Net loss and comprehensive loss

For the year ended December 31, 2023, net loss and comprehensive loss was $4,000,671, an increase of $2,932,280 compared to the comparable period in 2022. The increase was primarily driven by the write-off of E&E assets, a decrease in foreign exchange gain and higher corporate administrative expenses partially offset by a lower unrealized fair value loss on marketable securities and interest and finance income.

B. Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash flows

Year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023

For the year ended December 31, 2024, cash flows used in operating activities were $2,454,547, an increase of $768,504 compared to the comparable period in 2023. The increase was primarily due to higher corporate administrative costs and changes in non-cash working capital items.

For the year ended December 31, 2024, cash flows generated by investing activities were $1,935,563, a decrease of $25,445 compared to the comparable period in 2023. The decrease was due to a decrease in the redemption of short-term investments of $5,250,000, an increase in expenditures on E&E assets of $532,926 and a decrease in interest received of $131,519. This was partially offset by a decrease in short-term investments purchased of $5,900,000.

For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company did not have any cash flows generated by or used in financing activities.

Year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022

For the year ended December 31, 2023, cash flows used in operating activities were $1,686,043, a decrease of $105,769 compared to the comparable period in 2022. The decrease was primarily due to changes in non-cash working capital items partially offset by higher corporate administrative costs.

For the year ended December 31, 2023, cash flows generated by investing activities were $1,961,008, an increase of $14,478,283 compared to the comparable period in 2022. The increase was due to the redemption of short-term investments of $14,000,000, a decrease in short-term investments purchased of $500,000 and an increase of interest received in the amount of $475,280. This was partially offset by an increase in expenditures on E&E assets in the amount of $496,997.

For the year ended December 31, 2023, cash flows generated by financing activities were nil, a decrease of $13,853,420 compared to the comparable period in 2022. The Company completed its IPO in 2022 for gross proceeds of $15,019,000, offset by cash share issuance costs of $1,165,580.

Liquidity, capital resources and going concern

The Company has not generated revenue or cash flows from its operations to date. As at December 31, 2024, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $10,099,253 since inception and has a working capital (current assets less current liabilities) surplus of $5,184,549 (December 31, 2023 – $9,039,896). The operations of the Company have primarily been funded by the issuance of Common Shares.

The continuing operations of the Company are dependent upon obtaining necessary financing to meet the Company’s commitments as they come due and to finance future exploration and development of mineral interests, secure and maintain title to properties, and upon future profitable production.

Management regularly reviews the current Company capital structure and updates its expenditure budgets and forecasts as necessary, to determine whether or not new financing will need to be obtained, and what type of financing is appropriate given the changing market conditions.

Management estimates its current working capital will be sufficient to fund its current level of activities for at least the next twelve months.

Despite the Company’s success to date in raising capital to fund its operations, there is significant uncertainty that the Company will be able to secure any additional financing in the current or future equity markets. Refer to the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report. Failure to obtain additional financing could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation and could cast uncertainty on our ability to continue as a going concern. The quantity of funds to be raised and the terms of any proposed equity financing that may be undertaken will be negotiated by management as opportunities to raise funds arise. Specific plans related to the use of proceeds will be devised once financing has been completed and management knows what funds will be available for these purposes.

Mineral Property Obligations

The Company is required to make pre-production, lease and/or advanced royalty payments on each of its projects to keep the agreements in good standing. In addition, for the Kelly Creek and Lone Mountain projects, the Company is required to incur E&E expenditures (i.e. work commitments) under those respective agreements. For details of these commitments refer to section “Item 4.D. Property, Plant and Equipment and E&E assets” in this Annual Report or refer to Note 10 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Introductory Agent Agreement

The Company executed an introductory agent agreement with BMR (the “BMR Agreement”). Under the BMR Agreement, should a mineral property recommended by BMR be acquired by the Company, the Company shall pay an introductory agent fee as follows:

​

If commercial production is achieved on a property recommended by BMR, the Company shall pay a 0.5% net smelter return royalty on all mineral interests acquired within the area of influence of the mineral property. Introductory agent fees and net smelter return royalty payments totaling $1,000,000 paid by the Company will reduce the net smelter return royalty by 50% to 0.25%.

As at December 31, 2024, the BMR Agreement is not in effect for any of the Company’s mineral projects.

The BMR Agreement was in effect for the Miller Project, as of February 1, 2021, until the mineral lease agreement was terminated on December 18, 2023. The Company paid a total of $35,000 in introductory agent fees to BMR during that period.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

Material Accounting Policy Information

A summary of material accounting policy information of the Company is presented in Note 3 of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles under IFRS Accounting Standards and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

Statement of compliance and basis of presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards as issued by the IASB.

The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis except for financial instruments classified as fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”), which are stated at their fair value.

Basis of consolidation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the financial statements of the Company and the entity controlled by the Company, its subsidiary, listed in the following table:

​

Control is defined as the exposure, or rights, to variable returns from involvement with an investee and the ability to affect those returns through power over the investee. Power over an investee exists when the Company has existing rights that give the Company the ability to direct the activities that significantly affect the investee’s returns. This control is generally evidenced through owning more than 50% of the voting rights or currently exercisable potential voting rights of a subsidiary’s share capital. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases.

Intercompany balances and transactions, including any unrealized income and expenses arising from intercompany transactions, are eliminated in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Foreign currency translation

Functional and presentation currency

Items included in the financial statements of each consolidated entity are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the “functional currency”). The functional currency of the Company and its subsidiary is the USD, which is also the Company’s presentation currency.

Transactions and balances

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses result from the settlement of foreign currency transactions and from the translation of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than an entity’s functional currency. These gains (losses) are recognized in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates as at the date of the initial transactions.

Financial instruments

Financial instruments – Classification

Financial assets are classified at initial recognition as either: measured at amortized cost, FVTPL or fair value through other comprehensive income (“FVOCI”). The classification depends on the Company’s business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual terms which give rise to the cash flows.

For assets measured at fair value, gains (losses) will either be recorded in earnings (loss) or other comprehensive income (“OCI”). For investments in debt instruments, this will depend on the business model for which the investment is held. For investments in equity instruments that are not held for trading, this will depend on whether the Company has made an irrevocable election at the time of initial recognition to account for the equity investment at FVOCI.

The Company reclassifies debt investments when, and only when, its business model for managing those assets changes.

Financial instruments – Measurement

At initial recognition, the Company measures a financial asset at its fair value plus, in the case of a financial asset not at FVTPL, transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset. Transaction costs of financial assets carried at FVTPL are expensed in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss.

Financial assets with embedded derivatives are considered in their entirety when determining whether their cash flows are solely payment of principal and interest.

Subsequent measurement of debt instruments depends on the Company’s business model for managing the asset and the cash flow characteristics of the asset. There are three measurement categories into which the Company classifies its debt instruments:

Changes in the fair value of financial assets at FVTPL are recognized in gain (loss) on change in fair value of financial instruments in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss as applicable.

Financial instruments - Impairment

An expected credit loss (“ECL”) impairment model applies which requires a loss allowance to be recognized based on ECLs. The estimated present value of future cash flows associated with the asset is determined and an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between this amount and the carrying amount as follows: the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to estimated present value of the future cash flows associated with the asset, discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate, either directly or through the use of an allowance account and the resulting loss is recognized in earnings (loss) for the period.

In a subsequent period, if the amount of the impairment loss related to financial assets measured at amortized cost decreases, the previously recognized impairment loss is reversed through earnings (loss) to the extent that the carrying amount of the investment at the date the impairment is reversed does not exceed what the amortized cost would have been had the impairment not been recognized.

Financial instruments - Derecognition

The Company derecognizes financial assets only when the contractual rights to cash flows from the financial assets expire, or when it transfers the financial assets and substantially all of the associated risks and rewards of ownership to another entity. Gains and losses on derecognition are generally recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash holdings in business and savings accounts held at major financial institutions with an original maturity date of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents are classified at amortized cost. Interest and finance income is recognized by applying the effective interest rate method.

Short-term investments

Short-term investments comprise term deposits and redeemable short-term investment certificates (“RSTICs”) held at major financial institutions with an original maturity date between three and twelve months. Short-term investments are classified at amortized cost. Interest and finance income is recognized by applying the effective interest rate method.

Marketable securities

Marketable securities comprise of Common Shares of publicly traded companies. Marketable securities are recorded at FVTPL and, accordingly, are recorded on the statement of financial position at fair value. Changes in fair value at each reporting date are included in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss as an unrealized fair value gain (loss) on marketable securities.

Accounts payable

Accounts payable are recognized initially at fair value, net of any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition these financial liabilities are held at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

E&E assets

All E&E expenditures are capitalized, including the costs of acquiring exploration stage properties, except for E&E expenditures incurred before the Company has obtained legal rights to explore an area, which are expensed.

Exploration expenditures are costs incurred in the initial search for mineral deposits with economic potential or in the process of obtaining more information about existing mineral deposits. Exploration expenditures typically include costs associated with prospecting, sampling, mapping, drilling and other work involved in searching for Mineral Resources, as defined by NI 43-101.

Evaluation expenditures are the costs incurred to establish the technical feasibility and commercial viability of developing mineral deposits identified through exploration activities, business combinations or asset acquisitions. Evaluation expenditures include the cost of: (i) further defining the volume and grade of deposits through drilling of core samples and other sampling techniques, trenching and sampling activities in an ore body or other forms or data acquisition; (ii) determining the optimal methods of extraction and metallurgical and treatment processes; (iii) studies related to surveying, transportation and infrastructure requirements; (iv) permitting activities; and (v) economic evaluations to determine whether development or mineralized material is commercially justified including preliminary economic assessments, pre-feasibility and final feasibility studies.

Once the technical feasibility and commercial viability of the extraction of mineral reserves or mineral resources from a particular mineral property has been determined, expenditures are tested for impairment and reclassified to mineral properties.

Impairment of non-financial assets

The carrying amounts of assets included in E&E assets and property and equipment are assessed for impairment at the end of each reporting period or whenever facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If there are indicators of impairment, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of any impairment. Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from other assets, the recoverable amount of the cash generating unit (“CGU”) to which the asset belongs is determined. The recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is determined as the higher of its fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use. An impairment loss exists if the assets or CGU’s carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount and is recorded as an expense immediately.

Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Costs of disposal are incremental costs directly attributable to the disposal of an asset. Future cash flows are estimated using the following significant assumptions: mineral reserves and mineral resources, production profile, operating costs, capital costs, commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and discount rates. All inputs used are those that an independent market participant would consider appropriate.

Value in use is determined as the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from continuing use of an asset or cash generating unit in its present form. These estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset or cash generating unit for which estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.

Tangible assets that have been impaired in prior periods are tested for possible reversal of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the impairment has reversed. If the impairment has reversed, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount, but not beyond the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in the prior periods. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognized into earnings (loss) immediately.

Share capital

Common Shares are classified as equity. Transaction costs directly attributable to the issue of Common Shares, share options and warrants are recognized as a deduction from equity, net of any tax effects.

If Common Shares are issued as consideration for the acquisition of a mineral project, the Common Shares are measured at their fair value based on the quoted share price of the Company on the date the transaction is executed.

The Company applies the residual value method with respect to the measurement of Common Shares and warrants issued as a unit for a private placement. The residual value method first allocates value to the more easily measurable component based on fair value (i.e. Common Shares) and then the residual value, if any, to the less measurable component (i.e. warrants). Any value attributed to the warrants is recorded to other reserves in equity.

Share-based payment transactions

Share options granted under the Company’s equity settled share-based option plan are measured at fair value at the date of grant and recognized as an expense with a corresponding increase to other reserves in equity. An individual is classified as an employee when the individual is an employee for legal and tax purposes (direct employee) or provides services similar to those performed by a direct employee. Equity settled share-based payment transactions with non-employees are measured at the fair value of the goods or services received.

However, if the fair value cannot be estimated reliably, the share-based payment transaction is measured at the fair value of the equity instrument granted at the date the non-employee provides the goods or the services.

Fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which relies on estimates of the risk-free interest rate, expected share price volatility, future dividend payments and the expected average life of the options. The fair value determined at the grant date is recognized as an expense over the vesting period in accordance with the vesting terms and conditions (graded vesting method), with a corresponding increase to other reserves in equity.

When share options are exercised, the applicable amounts of other reserves are transferred to share capital.

Significant Accounting Estimates and Judgements

The preparation of financial statements requires the use of accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise judgment in the process of applying its accounting policies. Estimates and policy judgments are regularly evaluated and are based on management’s experience and other factors, including expectations about future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected.

Significant accounting policy judgments include:

Significant sources of material estimation uncertainty include:

C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.

The Company is an exploration and evaluation mining company and does not carry on any research and development activities.

D. Trend Information

Refer to “Item 4.B. Business Overview – Industry and economic factors that may affect our business” and “Item 4.B. Business Overview – Gold Price History” for a discussion of industry and economic conditions and trends that may affect our business results.

E. Critical Accounting Estimates

Refer to the “Significant Accounting Estimates and Judgements” section of this Annual Report.

​

​

ITEM 6 - DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

A. Directors and Senior Management

The following is a list of our current directors and the Company’s senior management as of March 27, 2025.

​

A brief profile of each of the Directors and senior management is given below:

Joseph Ovsenek, P.Eng., LLB - Chairman & Non-Independent Director

Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Ovsenek was President and CEO of Pretium Resources Inc. where he led the advance of the high-grade gold Brucejack Mine which has been operating profitably since commercial start-up in 2017. Mr. Ovsenek began his nine-year tenure at Pretium Resources Inc. in 2011 as Chief Development Officer and led the financing of the company from exploration stage to operations and was subsequently appointed President in 2015 and President and CEO in 2017. Prior to Pretium Resources Inc. he served for 15 years in senior management roles for Silver Standard Resources Inc. (now SSR Mining Inc.), where he was responsible for financings, the acquisition and sale of several assets, and was instrumental in developing corporate strategy. Mr. Ovsenek holds a Bachelor of Applied Science degree from the University of British Columbia and a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of Toronto. Mr. Ovsenek is a registered member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia.

Dennis Higgs, B.Com - President & Non-Independent Director

During his career of over forty years, Mr. Higgs has been involved in the founding, financing, initial public listing, and building of several companies, four of which have been the subject of successful takeover bids. He was the founding Director and Executive Chairman of Uranerz Energy Corporation (“Uranerz”) for ten years, listing that company’s shares on the NYSE American with options called to trade on the Chicago Board Options Exchange. During his tenure at Uranerz, he was instrumental in the acquisition, financing, development, and production start-up of Uranerz’s Nichols Ranch in-situ recovery uranium production facility, located in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming. Uranerz was acquired by Energy Fuels Inc. in 2015 in a $320 million business combination. Mr. Higgs currently serves on the Board of TSX and NYSE American-listed Energy Fuels Inc., which is now the leading U.S. producer of uranium and vanadium. Mr. Higgs holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of British Columbia.

Robert Hatch, SME RM – VP Exploration

Mr. Hatch is a seasoned Exploration Geologist with over forty-five years of experience in exploration, management, permitting, and marketing. His primary focus has been on gold and silver projects throughout the USA, Australia, and New Zealand.

Focusing on earlier stage exploration, he believes that understanding both the regional geological controls on deposit location and the concepts of deposit genesis are essential to enhance the opportunity for success and reduce the risks associated with exploration at this stage.

Mr. Hatch started his career with twelve years at Homestake Mining Company as an Exploration Geologist and Project Manager. While at Homestake he was involved with the McLaughlin Mine discovery in California and was the first geologist to explore the Almaden Mine in Idaho for gold. Over the years he has consulted for several major mining companies and publicly listed juniors in various positions including Exploration Vice President and Chief Geologist. In recent years he has concentrated on advancing three successful private gold/silver exploration companies that he founded or co-founded.

Darcy Higgs, B.Com – VP Business Development

Darcy Higgs has over forty years of experience in capital markets. He was registered in Canada and the USA and acted as a consultant to one of the largest private equity firms in China, including guiding its $75 million investment in Pretium Resources Inc. Mr. Higgs has been a director of URZ (formerly NGE) since January 2022 and was interim CEO from December 2023 to May 2024. Mr. Higgs has a Bachelor of Commerce (Finance) from the University of British Columbia.

Grant Bond, B.Sc., CPA, CA – CFO

Mr. Bond is a Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA, CA) with more than 12 years of financial management experience in the mining industry. He has an extensive background in financial and risk management, financial reporting and SOX compliance. He currently serves as the CFO of P2 Gold Inc., an exploration mining company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange and Innovation Mining Inc. Before this, he was the Corporate Controller at Pretium Resources Inc., responsible for managing the accounting and financial reporting functions as Pretium Resources Inc. evolved from an explorer to a profitable intermediate gold producer. Mr. Bond began his career in the assurance group at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, primarily focusing on operating and exploration mining clients. He holds a Diploma in Accounting and Bachelor of Science from the University of British Columbia.

Barbara Filas, P.E., Q.P. – Independent Director

Ms. Filas is internationally recognized in the mining sector in the disciplines of management, environmental and social responsibility, and sustainability. She has hands-on experience at operating gold and coal mining and processing facilities; executive experience in consulting, public companies, and non-profits; and project experience on six continents. She was the first female President of the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration Inc. in 2005, the world’s largest mining technical society, and currently volunteers as the Nominations Chair and Chair of the Board of Governors for the National Mining Hall of Fame and Museum. Ms. Filas is a graduate of the University of Arizona and is a licensed professional Mining Engineer and Qualified Person. She currently serves on the Board of Energy Fuels Inc. (NYSE American: UUUU; TSX: EFR).

Guillermo Lozano-Chávez, M.Sc., MBA – Independent Director

Mr. Lozano is a Professional Geologist with over 40 years of experience in mineral exploration in Latin America and he manages his own geological consulting firm. Previously, he was Vice President of Exploration for First Majestic Silver Corp., where he was responsible for all exploration programs in and around five operating mines. Before joining First Majestic Silver, he was Director of Exploration for Silver Standard Resources Inc. (now SSR Mining Inc.), where he managed their Mexico exploration and overviewed their Peruvian and Argentinian exploration activities from 2002 through 2012. Prior to coming to Silver Standard and since 1990, he worked as a consultant for several international major and junior companies in Central and South America, while consulting and managing his own personal consulting firm in Mexico. Before that, he worked for the Penoles Group since 1979 as an exploration geologist and mine manager.

Mr. Lozano holds a Bachelor of Science in Geological Engineering from the National Polytechnical Institute of Mexico City, a Master of Science degree in Geology from the University of Missouri at Columbia, and a Master of Business Administration in Finance, from the University of Texas at El Paso.

Sandra MacKay – Independent Director

Ms. MacKay brings over 30 years of corporate commercial legal experience to the Company. She has acted as a board member and been an advisor on governance and legal matters to the boards of several public companies. Ms. MacKay was Global Vice President, Legal for Copperleaf Technologies Inc. (“Copperleaf”), a global supplier of AI-empowered asset investment planning software; Copperleaf was recently acquired in an acquisition valued at $1 billion.

Previously, Sandra was Senior Vice President, Legal of Uranerz Energy Corporation, a leading integrated producer of uranium in the USA, and Vice President, Legal of Chemetics Inc., an international engineering technology company. She held senior legal counsel positions with QLT Inc., a dual-listed biotechnology company, and Chevron Canada Limited. Sandra has a wealth of legal experience including securities law, employment law, and intellectual property law matters. She holds a Juris Doctor from the University of British Columbia and is a member of the Law Society of British Columbia.

Kenneth McNaughton, M.A. Sc., P.Eng. – Non-Independent Director

Mr. McNaughton is a professional geological engineer with over 30 years of global experience developing and leading mineral exploration programs. Mr. McNaughton was previously the Chief Exploration Officer at Pretium Resources Inc. Prior to joining Pretium Resources Inc. in 2011, he was Vice President, Exploration for Silver Standard Resources Inc. (now SSR Mining Inc.) where he had been responsible for all exploration programs since 1991. Prior to joining Silver Standard, he was employed by Corona Corporation and its affiliate Mascot Gold Mines Ltd. as a project geologist and engineer for projects in British Columbia. Mr. McNaughton holds a Bachelor of Applied Science degree and a Master of Applied Science degree in geological engineering from the University of Windsor.

Tom Yip, CPA, CA –Independent Director

Mr. Yip has over 30 years of financial management experience in the mining industry for exploration and development companies and producers. He was Executive Vice President and CFO for Pretium Resources Inc, after being a member of its Board of Directors (2011 – 2020) and CFO for Silver Standard Resources Inc. (now SSR Mining Inc.), serving as a key member of the leadership team when each company transitioned from exploration and development to production. He began his mining career at Echo Bay Mines Ltd. where he served as its CFO before the company merged with Kinross Gold Corporation in 2003. Mr. Yip is a Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA, CA) and holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree in Business Administration from the University of Alberta.

Directorships

Certain of the directors of the Company are also directors of other reporting issuers (or equivalent) in a jurisdiction or a foreign jurisdiction as follows:

​