Exhibit 99.1

This business combination involves the securities of a Brazilian company. The business combination is subject to disclosure requirements of Brazil that are different from those of the United States. Financial statements included in the document, if any, have been prepared in accordance with foreign accounting standards that may not be comparable to financial statements of United States companies.

It may be difficult for you to enforce your rights and any claim you may have arising under the U.S. federal securities laws, since the issuer is located in Brazil, and some or all of its officers and directors may be residents of Brazil. You may not be able to sue a Brazilian company or its officers or directors in a Brazilian court for violations of the U.S. securities laws. It may be difficult to compel a Brazilian company and its affiliates to subject themselves to a U.S. court’s judgment.

You should be aware that the issuer may purchase securities otherwise than under the exchange offer, such as in open market or privately negotiated purchases.

*            *         *

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN OF MERGER FOR THE MERGER OF BRF S.A. SHARES INTO MARFRIG GLOBAL FOODS S.A.

By this private instrument, the directors of the companies identified below, as well as the companies themselves:

WHEREAS:

NOW THEREFORE RESOLVE, having agreed and agreed among themselves, to enter into this “First Amendment to the Plan of Merger for the Merger of BRF S.A. Shares into Marfrig Global Foods S.A.” (“Amendment”), under the terms and conditions below.

“ 8.1. Conditions Precedent. The effectiveness of the Merger of Shares will be subject to the following conditions (collectively, the “Conditions Precedent”):

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties sign this Plan of Merger electronically, together with the 2 (two) witnesses below.

São Paulo, May 26, 2025.

(Signature page follows.)

(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.)

(Signature page of the First Amendment to the Plan of Merger for the Merger of BRF S.A. into Marfrig Global Foods S.A., executed on 26 May, 2025)

MARFRIG GLOBAL FOODS S.A.

BRF S.A.

Witnesses:

Annex (A)

Amended and Restated Plan of Merger

AMENDED AND RESTATED PLAN OF MERGER FOR THE MERGER OF BRF S.A. SHARES INTO MARFRIG GLOBAL FOODS S.A.

By this private instrument, the directors of the companies identified below, as well as the companies themselves:

WHEREAS:

NOW THEREFORE RESOLVE, having mutually agreed and resolved, to execute this Plan of Merger for the merger of BRF S.A. Shares into Marfrig Global Foods S.A.” (“Plan of Merger”), in accordance with the provisions of Articles 224, 225, and 252 of Law No. 6,404, dated December 15, 1976 (“Brazilian Corporations Law”), to regulate the terms and conditions applicable to the Merger (as defined in Clause 1.1 below), subject to the satisfaction (or waiver, as the case may be) of the Conditions Precedent (as defined in Clause 8.1 below) and the occurrence of the Closing Date (as defined in Clause 8.2 below).

“Article 5. The Company’s share capital, fully subscribed and paid-up, is R$15,468,781,313.18 (fifteen billion, four hundred and sixty-eight million, seven hundred and eighty-one thousand, three hundred and thirteen reais and eighteen centavos), divided into 1,497,671,577 (one billion, four hundred and ninety-seven million, six hundred and seventy-one thousand, five hundred and seventy-seven) common shares, all registered, in book-entry form and with no par value.”

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties sign this Plan of Merger electronically, together with the 2 (two) witnesses below.

*      *      *

Annex 3.1.5

Exchange Ratio Adjustment Mechanism

R = B2 ÷ M2, where:

Annex 4.2

Merger Appraisal Report

(This annex begins on the following page.)

(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.)

APPRAISAL REPORT AP - 00521/25 - 01 BRF S.A.

APPRAISAL REPORT: AP - 00521/25 - 01 VALUATION DATE: May 14 th , 2025 1 REQUESTER: MARFRIG GLOBAL FOODS S.A., hereinafter referred to as MARFRIG. Publicly held corporation, headquartered at Av. Queiroz Filho, No. 1.560, Bloco 5, Sabiá Tower, 3 rd Floor, Room 301, Vila Hamburguesa, City and State of São Paulo, registered with the CNPJ under No. 03.853.896/0001 - 40. OBJECT: Shares of BRF S.A., hereinafter referred to as BRF. Publicly held corporation, headquartered at Rua Jorge Tzachel, No. 475, Fazenda, City of Itajaí, State of Santa Catarina, registered with the CNPJ under No. 01.838.723/0001 - 27. OBJECTIVE: Determination of the value of the shares issued by BRF, using the market approach, through the volume - weighted average price of the shares, in compliance with article 252 of Law No. 6,404/1976 (Brazilian Corporation Law).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APSIS CONSULTORIA E AVALIAÇÕES LTDA . , hereinafter referred to as APSIS, headquartered at Rua do Passeio, No . 62 , 6 th floor, Centro, City and State of Rio de Janeiro, registered with the CNPJ under No . 08 . 681 . 365 / 0001 - 30 , was appointed to determine the market value of BRF shares, to be merged by MARFRIG, for the purpose of complying with the provisions of article 252 of Law No . 6 , 404 / 1976 (Brazilian Corporation Law) . In this Report, we use the market approach, through the Volume - Weighted Average Price (VWAP) 1 of the shares, to determine the equity value of BRF . The methodology aims to value a company by the sum of all its shares at market prices . Because the price of a stock is defined by the present value of the future dividend stream and a sale price at the end of the period, at a required rate of return, under the Efficient Market Hypothesis, this approach would indicate the correct value of the company to investors, when not affected by factors such as the stock's liquidity in the market . For the selection of the intervals considered in the VWAP calculation, we applied the criteria generally accepted in the market for operations of this nature, in line with the usual practices of the appraised company’s industry, and with parameters provided for in Law No . 6 , 404 / 76 (Brazilian Corporation Law) and CVM Resolution No . 85 / 22 , Annex C . The selection of these intervals was based on the representativeness and liquidity of the shares traded in the period, in order to faithfully reflect the market value of the company under normal trading conditions, mitigating any distortions . The following criteria were considered for the evaluation : ▪ The shares’ spot price on the last business day prior to the issuance of this Report. ▪ Volume - weighted average price of the shares traded on the stock exchange or in the organized over - the - counter market, during the 30 days immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of this Report. ▪ Volume - weighted average price of shares traded on the stock exchange or in the organized over - the - counter market, during the 90 days immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of this Report. ▪ Volume - weighted average price of shares traded on the stock exchange or in the organized over - the - counter market, during the 12 months immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of the Report. Note : any differences between the valuation date and the analyzed dates are due to market closures on the respective dates . 1 The Volume - Weighted Average Price (VWAP) is calculated based on the average of closing prices, weighted by the volume traded. The data was extracted from the S&P Capital IQ Pro platform. 2

VALUATION THROUGH THE VOLUME - WEIGHTED AVERAGE PRICE OF SHARES ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE 2 Arm’s length transaction: An "arm's length" transaction refers to a deal in which buyers and sellers act independently, without one party influencing the other. SPOT VWAP 1 PERIOD DESCRIPTION REFERENCE 19.68 - - 20.74 14/05/2025 31/03/2025 - 14/05/2025 Share price on the last business day prior to the issuance of the report (spot) 30 days prior to the last business day before the issuance of the report n/a a - 20.52 02/01/2025 - 14/05/2025 90 days prior to the last business day before the issuance of the report b - 22.21 15/05/2024 - 14/05/2025 12 months prior to the last business day before the issuance of the report c BRF'S EQUITY VALUE (BRL '000) PERIOD (mm/dd/yyyy) VALUATION BASED ON THE VOLUME - WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF PRICE OF SHARES ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE 20.52 02/01/2025 - 14/05/2025 VWAP on the 90 days immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of the Report. (R$) 1,600,310,613 10/05/2025* Quantity of BRF common stock (shares)* 32,844,025 BRF'S EQUITY VALUE (BRL '000) *Source: BRF's Investor Relations website. Excluding Treasury Shares. Accessed on 15/05/2025. <https://ri.brf - global.com/en/corporate - gov ernance/shareholder - structure/> 1. Volume - Weighted Average Price (VWAP) - Source data extracted from S&P Capital IQ Pro. Note: Eventual diferences between the base date and analyzed dates are due to market closures on the respective dates. Adopted methodology. CONCLUSION The appraisers concluded that the most appropriate methodology for BRF's valuation is the value of the volume - weighted average price of the shares in the 90 days prior to the last business day before the issuance of the Report . This methodology covers the period closest to the Report’s date of signature, offering a sufficiently large and representative sample, which contributes to diluting any specific distortions of price and volume . In addition, it complies with the parameters established in Article 256 of the Brazilian Corporation Law and in Annex C of CVM Resolution No . 85 / 22 . Based on this approach, the volume - weighted average price of BRF's shares is R $ 20 . 52 (twenty reais and fifty - two cents) per share, resulting in a total equity value of R $ 32 , 844 , 025 thousand (thirty - two billion, eight hundred and forty four million, twenty five thousand reais) . The appraisers consider that the volume - weighted average price of the shares is the most appropriate criterion to determine the fair price of the company's shares . According to the appraisers’ understanding, all the methodologies adopted are based on negotiations carried out between independent parties, with full knowledge of the business and free of pressure or interests unrelated to the essence of the transaction, being, due to these characteristics, classified as operations carried out under conditions of independence, or arm's length . 2 In addition, it should be noted that the methodology adopted for the conclusion of this Report is in accordance with Level 1 of the information hierarchy provided for in Technical Pronouncement CPC 46 (Fair Value Measurement), issued by the Brazilian Accounting Pronouncements Committee (CPC) which prioritizes the use of observable and reliable data, considered the most appropriate for measuring the fair value of assets . 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................................... ... ............................................................................................................................. ... .......................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ................... 5 2. PRINCIPLES AND CAVEATS ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. .. 6 3. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... . 7 4. BRF CHARACTERIZATION ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... .. 8 5. VALUATION METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. 9 6. VALUATION THROUGH THE VOLUME - WEIGHTED AVERAGE PRICE OF SHARES ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE.................................................................................................................... 10 7. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ..................... 13 8. LIST OF ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ............. 14 4

1. INTRODUCTION APSIS CONSULTORIA E AVALIAÇÕES LTDA . , hereinafter referred to as APSIS, headquartered at Rua do Passeio, No . 62 , 6 th floor, Centro, City and State of Rio de Janeiro, registered with the CNPJ under No . 08 . 681 . 365 / 0001 - 30 , was appointed to determine the market value of BRF shares, to be merged by MARFRIG, for the purpose of complying with the provisions in article 252 of Law No . 6 , 404 / 1976 (Brazilian Corporation Law) . In the preparation of this work, data and information provided by third parties were used, in the form of documents and verbal interviews with the client . The estimates used in this process are based on : ▪ Public information collected in the S&P Capital IQ Pro platform. ▪ Audited Financial Statements of BRF as of December 31 st , 2024. ▪ Public information of BRF. ▪ Results spreadsheet extracted from the company's investor relations website. The professionals who participated in the preparation of this work are listed below : ▪ BRUNO GRAVINA BOTTINO – Director ▪ CAIO CESAR CAPELARI FAVERO – Director / Administrator and Accountant (CRA 141231 and CRC 1SP342654) ▪ DANIEL FELIX LAMONICA – Projects ▪ LEONARDO HENRIQUE CARDOSO BRAZ – Projects ▪ LUCAS ARAUJO DA SILVA CARDOZO – Projects ▪ MARCELO CAMPOS FARINHA – Projects ▪ RODRIGO MENNA BARRETO AMIL – Projects 5

2. PRINCIPLES AND CAVEATS The Report, the object of the work enumerated, calculated and particularized, carefully obeys the fundamental principles described below, which are important and should be carefully read. ▪ The consultants have no interest, direct or indirect, in the companies involved or in the transaction, and there is no other relevant circumstance that could characterize a conflict of interest. ▪ APSIS's professional fees are in no way subject to the findings of this Report. ▪ To the best knowledge and to the credit of the consultants, the analyses, opinions, and conclusions expressed in this Report are based on true and correct data, diligence, research and surveys. ▪ The information received from third parties is assumed to be correct, and their sources are contained and cited in the Report. ▪ For projection purposes, it is assumed that there are no encumbrances of any nature, judicial or extrajudicial, affecting the companies in question, other than those listed in this Report, if applicable. ▪ The Report presents all the limiting conditions imposed by the methodologies adopted, if any, that may affect the analyses, opinions and conclusions contained therein. ▪ The Report was prepared by APSIS, and no one, except its own consultants, prepared the analyses and corresponding conclusions. ▪ APSIS assumes full responsibility for the matter of Valuations, including implicit ones, for the exercise of its honorable functions, primarily established in its own laws, codes or regulations. ▪ This Report meets the recommendations and criteria established by the Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT), the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and the International Valuation Standards (IVS) . ▪ The controlling shareholder and the managers of the companies involved have not directed, limited, hindered or performed any acts that have or may have compromised the availability, use or knowledge of information, goods, documents or work methodologies relevant to the quality of the conclusions contained in this Report . ▪ The internal process of drafting and approving this document involved the following main steps : (I) analysis of the company's public documents ; (II) extraction, through the S&P Capital IQ Pro database, of quotations and historical volumes of the company's shares traded on the stock exchange or in the organized over - the - counter market ; (III) elaboration of calculations of the volume - weighted average price (VWAP) in different intervals ; (IV) preparation of the calculation of the company's equity value ; (V) submission of the report for independent internal review ; (V) implementation of any improvements and suggested changes ; (VI) issuance of a final report . 6

3. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY ▪ To prepare this Report, APSIS used and assumed as true and coherent information and historical data audited by third parties or not audited, provided in writing by the company's management or obtained from the aforementioned sources, and has no responsibility for their veracity . ▪ The scope of this valuation did not include an audit of the financial statements, or a review of the work carried out by its auditors . Accordingly, APSIS is not expressing an opinion on the Applicant's financial statements and measurements . ▪ APSIS is not responsible for occasional losses to the Requester and its subsidiaries, its partners, directors and creditors or other parties as a result of the use of the data and information provided by the company and contained in this Report . ▪ This Report was developed solely for the use of the Requester and its partners, aiming at the purpose already described ; therefore, it should not be published, circulated, reproduced, disseminated or used for any purpose other than the aforementioned one without the prior written approval of APSIS . ▪ The analyses and conclusions contained herein are based on several assumptions made on the present date, regarding operational projections, such as prices, volumes, market shares, revenues, taxes, investments, margins, etc . Thus, the company's future results may be different from any forecast or estimate of this work, especially if there is later knowledge of information not available at the time of the issuance of the Report . ▪ This assessment does not reflect events and impacts that occurred after the date of issuance of the Report . ▪ APSIS is not responsible for direct or indirect losses of profits that may arise from the improper use of this Report . ▪ We emphasize that understanding the conclusion of this Report will occur through the full reading of it and its annexes, and therefore no conclusions should be drawn from partial reading, which may be incorrect or mistaken . 7

4. BRF CHARACTERIZATION BRF is one of the world's largest producers of fresh and frozen animal protein, standing out for its extensive production capacity and a portfolio of more than 7 , 300 SKUs . Its products include marinated and frozen chicken, Chester® chicken, turkey meats, specialty meats, frozen processed meats, ready meals, fractionated items, as well as plant - based products . The company also sells margarine, butter, cottage cheese, special sweets, sandwiches, plant - based foods and animal feed . Owner of leading brands widely recognized by the public, such as Sadia, Perdigão and Qualy, BRF consolidated its position in the market from the merger between two traditional family businesses : Perdigão and Sadia . The union was announced in 2009 and completed in 2012 , marking the creation of one of the largest conglomerates in the food sector . Both companies already occupied prominent positions in the national and international market, with products exported to more than 120 countries . In the pet food segment, BRF has four manufacturing units, located in the states of São Paulo, Rio Grande do Sul, Paraná and also in Paraguay . Its portfolio includes brands such as Biofresh, Guabi Natural, Gran Plus, Balance, Three Dogs, Three Cats, PrimoCão, PrimoGato, Faro, Bônos, Apolo and Átila, serving different consumer profiles and their pets . BRF Operations With a 40.8% share of the Brazilian processed food market as of December 31, 2024, BRF maintains a solid structure consisting of 44 industrial units and 103 distribution centers. The company has a highly developed logistics system in the domestic market, supported by a vast distribution network that includes distribution centers and transit points. In 2024, this structure made it possible to serve approximately 415 thousand customers globally, with more than 500 thousand deliveries per month, according to MARFRIG's 2024 Reference Form. Complementing its operational efficiency, BRF invests in technology through a digital sales platform that suggests orders in a personalized way, based on the characteristics of each point of sale. Also, according to MAFRIG's Reference Form, the company demonstrated strong capillarity, with more than 300 thousand active customers in Brazil in June 2024. 8

5. VALUATION METHODOLOGY 1. MARKET APPROACH – LISTING ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE In this Report, we use the market approach, through the Volume - Weighted Average Price (VWAP), to determine the equity value of BRF . The methodology aims to appraise a company by the sum of all its shares at market prices . Because the price of a stock is defined by the present value of the future dividend stream and a sale price at the end of the period, at a required rate of return, under the Efficient Market Hypothesis, this approach would indicate the correct value of the company to investors, when not affected by factors such as the stock's liquidity in the market . 9

6. VALUATION THROUGH THE VOLUME - WEIGHTED AVERAGE PRICE OF SHARES ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE For the selection of the intervals considered in the VWAP calculation, we applied the criteria generally accepted in the market for operations of this nature, in line with the usual practices of the appraised company’s industry, and with parameters provided for in Article 256 of Law No . 6 , 404 / 76 (Brazilian Corporation Law) . The selection of these intervals was based on the representativeness and liquidity of the shares traded in the period, in order to faithfully reflect the market value of the company under normal trading conditions, mitigating any distortions . The following criteria were considered for the evaluation: ▪ The shares’ spot price on the last business day prior to the issuance of this Report. ▪ Volume - weighted average price of the shares traded on the stock exchange or in the organized over - the - counter market, during the 30 days immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of this Report. ▪ Volume - weighted average price of shares traded on the stock exchange or in the organized over - the - counter market, during the 90 days immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of this Report. ▪ Volume - weighted average price of shares traded on the stock exchange or in the organized over - the - counter market, during the 12 months immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of the Report. Note: any differences between valuation date and analyzed dates are due to market closures on the respective dates. The quotes and historical volumes used in the valuation were extracted from the S&P Capital IQ Pro database and can be seen in Annex 1. 10

Valuation date: 14/05/2025, approximate reference range. Source: Quotes and volumes extracted from the S&P Capital IQ Pro database. 11

VOLUME - WEIGHTED AVERAGE PRICE OF SHARES ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE SPOT VWAP 1 PERIOD DESCRIPTION REFERENCE 19.68 - - 20.74 14/05/2025 31/03/2025 - 14/05/2025 Share price on the last business day prior to the issuance of the report (spot) 30 days prior to the last business day before the issuance of the report n/a a - 20.52 02/01/2025 - 14/05/2025 90 days prior to the last business day before the issuance of the report b - 22.21 15/05/2024 - 14/05/2025 12 months prior to the last business day before the issuance of the report c 1. Volume - Weighted Average Price (VWAP) - Source data extracted from S&P Capital IQ Pro. Note: Eventual diferences between the base date and analyzed dates are due to market closures on the respective dates. Adopted methodology. 12

7. CONCLUSION In light of the analysis of the aforementioned documentation and based on the studies carried out by APSIS, the experts concluded that the most appropriate methodology for the valuation of BRF is the volume - weighted average price of the shares in the 90 days prior to the last business day before the issuance of the Report . This methodology covers the period closest to the signature of the report, offering a sufficiently large and representative sample, capable of diluting any specific distortions of price and volume . In addition, it complies with the parameters established in Article 256 of the Brazilian Corporation Law and in Annex C of CVM Resolution No . 85 / 22 . Thus, based on this methodology, the volume - weighted average price of BRF's shares is R $ 20 . 52 (twenty reais and fifty - two cents) per share, resulting in a total equity value of R $ 32 , 844 , 025 thousand (thirty - two billion, eight hundred and forty four million, twenty five thousand reais) . The appraisers concluded that the volume - weighted average price of the shares is the most appropriate criterion for determining the fair price of the company's shares . According to the appraiser’s understanding, all the methodologies considered are based on negotiations carried out between independent parties, knowledgeable about the business and free from pressure or interests unrelated to the essence of the transaction, being, due to these characteristics, classified as operations in conditions of independence (arm's length) . In addition, it should be noted that the methodology adopted for the preparation of this Report is in accordance with the highest level (Level 1 ) of the hierarchy of information for determining fair value, as provided for in CPC 46 , prioritizing the use of data considered the most reliable and observable for the purpose of measuring the value of the asset . 13 Director BRF'S EQUITY VALUE (BRL '000) PERIOD (mm/dd/yyyy) VALUATION BASED ON THE VOLUME - WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF PRICE OF SHARES ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE 20.52 02/01/2025 - 14/05/2025 VWAP on the 90 days immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of the Report. (R$) 1,600,310,613 10/05/2025* Quantity of BRF common stock (shares)* 32,844,025 BRF'S EQUITY VALUE (BRL '000) *Source: BRF's Investor Relations website. Excluding Treasury Shares. Accessed on 15/05/2025. <https://ri.brf - global.com/en/corporate - gov ernance/shareholder - structure/> The Appraisal Report AP - 00521/25 - 01 was prepared by APSIS (CRC/RJ - 005112/O - 9), a company specialized in asset appraisal, legally represented below by its consultants, who are available for any clarifications that may be necessary. Rio de Janeiro, May 15 th , 2025.

8. LIST OF ANNEXES 1. Historical Quotes and Volumes 2. Glossary 14

ATTACHMENT 1

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) The table below presents BRF’s historical share prices and trading volumes used in the valuation methodology based on the volume - weighted average price of the shares. BRF’s closing share prices were obtained from the S&P Capital IQ Pro database. 1

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 11,292,700 19.68 14/05/2025 9,697,700 20.20 13/05/2025 8,375,400 19.71 12/05/2025 8,776,600 19.20 09/05/2025 8,273,200 20.39 08/05/2025 5,170,300 20.26 07/05/2025 10,499,200 20.35 06/05/2025 7,519,600 21.44 05/05/2025 5,563,100 22.46 02/05/2025 5,622,100 22.70 30/04/2025 6,045,700 22.75 29/04/2025 8,697,100 22.70 28/04/2025 10,862,300 22.90 25/04/2025 8,688,100 22.01 24/04/2025 7,533,300 21.49 23/04/2025 9,934,200 21.78 22/04/2025 7,661,400 21.15 17/04/2025 9,147,900 20.68 16/04/2025 4,400,300 20.67 15/04/2025 5,401,600 20.41 14/04/2025 4,913,400 20.54 11/04/2025 5,048,800 20.35 10/04/2025 9,422,800 20.56 09/04/2025 4,992,500 19.06 08/04/2025 6,937,400 19.20 07/04/2025 7,681,300 19.25 04/04/2025 4,804,700 19.64 03/04/2025 2

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 6,740,600 19.80 02/04/2025 6,581,100 20.14 01/04/2025 5,672,400 19.68 31/03/2025 6,184,600 19.71 28/03/2025 11,670,400 20.24 27/03/2025 5,613,100 19.72 26/03/2025 5,930,100 19.81 25/03/2025 4,771,600 19.42 24/03/2025 9,860,500 19.83 21/03/2025 9,504,900 19.82 20/03/2025 9,680,800 19.56 19/03/2025 10,726,200 19.64 18/03/2025 14,074,000 18.33 17/03/2025 8,474,800 18.11 14/03/2025 5,675,800 18.55 13/03/2025 7,296,900 19.09 12/03/2025 7,006,700 18.49 11/03/2025 5,548,600 18.88 10/03/2025 8,322,300 19.18 07/03/2025 10,560,500 18.50 06/03/2025 12,245,400 18.65 05/03/2025 14,580,500 17.93 28/02/2025 53,797,700 18.40 27/02/2025 9,129,500 19.01 26/02/2025 8,283,100 18.86 25/02/2025 5,179,400 18.70 24/02/2025 4,624,500 19.00 21/02/2025 3

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 6,125,100 18.73 20/02/2025 5,363,800 19.03 19/02/2025 6,461,900 19.19 18/02/2025 4,976,700 19.52 17/02/2025 13,397,400 20.02 14/02/2025 9,715,200 19.47 13/02/2025 6,770,400 20.23 12/02/2025 6,102,100 21.06 11/02/2025 5,257,500 21.35 10/02/2025 4,434,300 20.64 07/02/2025 3,974,100 21.17 06/02/2025 9,842,200 21.03 05/02/2025 10,860,200 20.79 04/02/2025 9,421,300 21.55 03/02/2025 5,447,300 21.89 31/01/2025 8,112,300 22.00 30/01/2025 4,066,700 22.03 29/01/2025 4,971,000 22.00 28/01/2025 5,518,200 22.33 27/01/2025 6,152,300 21.88 24/01/2025 11,017,200 21.75 23/01/2025 9,718,000 22.04 22/01/2025 26,287,100 21.75 21/01/2025 3,498,200 23.29 20/01/2025 6,836,500 22.78 17/01/2025 8,369,500 22.47 16/01/2025 5,863,200 24.15 15/01/2025 4

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 10,105,800 23.77 14/01/2025 5,086,700 23.55 13/01/2025 13,227,300 23.52 10/01/2025 6,033,000 23.48 09/01/2025 4,887,100 23.25 08/01/2025 6,581,800 23.72 07/01/2025 4,495,800 23.81 06/01/2025 5,513,800 24.01 03/01/2025 6,804,600 24.80 02/01/2025 8,146,700 25.36 30/12/2024 7,576,700 24.80 27/12/2024 6,751,600 25.47 26/12/2024 4,249,000 26.03 23/12/2024 18,188,500 26.35 20/12/2024 9,288,500 26.27 19/12/2024 17,929,400 26.54 18/12/2024 8,836,200 28.33 17/12/2024 7,694,300 28.35 16/12/2024 6,613,100 27.79 13/12/2024 6,071,100 27.82 12/12/2024 9,386,100 28.38 11/12/2024 7,432,100 27.75 10/12/2024 8,227,600 28.69 09/12/2024 8,692,300 28.32 06/12/2024 9,296,800 28.29 05/12/2024 14,262,500 27.80 04/12/2024 15,433,700 26.33 03/12/2024 5

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 6,826,000 25.20 02/12/2024 6,857,300 24.81 29/11/2024 5,711,000 24.41 28/11/2024 6,949,500 24.59 27/11/2024 6,556,100 24.38 26/11/2024 16,504,500 25.45 25/11/2024 7,896,600 25.21 22/11/2024 11,804,600 25.21 21/11/2024 19,692,600 24.41 19/11/2024 16,303,800 23.53 18/11/2024 34,538,600 24.95 14/11/2024 6,380,900 24.94 13/11/2024 6,274,800 24.97 12/11/2024 5,377,700 24.21 11/11/2024 5,873,800 24.10 08/11/2024 9,452,600 24.64 07/11/2024 7,287,600 25.98 06/11/2024 3,762,300 25.80 05/11/2024 7,332,000 26.01 04/11/2024 4,976,100 25.82 01/11/2024 15,821,300 26.23 31/10/2024 4,823,400 25.50 30/10/2024 6,649,300 25.52 29/10/2024 11,117,200 25.56 28/10/2024 6,728,800 24.41 25/10/2024 7,512,500 24.43 24/10/2024 6,908,800 24.35 23/10/2024 6

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 4,770,200 24.26 22/10/2024 9,721,800 24.32 21/10/2024 9,099,400 24.35 18/10/2024 8,548,700 23.89 17/10/2024 4,342,700 23.27 16/10/2024 3,970,900 23.30 15/10/2024 2,719,600 22.96 14/10/2024 4,943,200 22.77 11/10/2024 6,396,700 23.08 10/10/2024 5,065,000 22.62 09/10/2024 3,557,200 23.19 08/10/2024 5,040,800 22.88 07/10/2024 4,093,600 23.35 04/10/2024 5,828,200 23.74 03/10/2024 6,826,500 23.86 02/10/2024 5,891,100 24.28 01/10/2024 5,461,300 23.65 30/09/2024 3,950,400 24.26 27/09/2024 5,251,600 24.64 26/09/2024 5,044,500 25.27 25/09/2024 4,939,300 24.68 24/09/2024 4,190,500 24.83 23/09/2024 11,168,300 25.12 20/09/2024 9,942,500 25.05 19/09/2024 5,953,300 24.04 18/09/2024 4,356,400 25.01 17/09/2024 6,556,400 25.00 16/09/2024 7

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 9,828,700 24.67 13/09/2024 4,497,000 24.34 12/09/2024 5,519,900 23.97 11/09/2024 3,447,000 24.63 10/09/2024 5,969,300 24.51 09/09/2024 4,729,100 25.21 06/09/2024 4,201,400 25.41 05/09/2024 8,533,600 25.50 04/09/2024 6,204,400 24.47 03/09/2024 6,549,300 24.65 02/09/2024 8,844,900 26.23 30/08/2024 6,377,600 25.80 29/08/2024 5,569,000 26.03 28/08/2024 7,941,100 25.91 27/08/2024 6,321,400 25.30 26/08/2024 9,251,400 25.19 23/08/2024 5,239,400 25.71 22/08/2024 5,939,100 26.03 21/08/2024 8,272,700 25.40 20/08/2024 9,995,300 25.25 19/08/2024 8,933,300 24.30 16/08/2024 23,569,000 23.91 15/08/2024 11,645,800 23.51 14/08/2024 6,693,300 22.45 13/08/2024 4,458,200 21.85 12/08/2024 4,438,300 21.93 09/08/2024 3,949,400 21.54 08/08/2024 8

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 3,533,900 20.90 07/08/2024 5,156,300 20.79 06/08/2024 4,620,200 20.68 05/08/2024 4,368,200 20.95 02/08/2024 5,488,600 21.37 01/08/2024 5,240,300 21.06 31/07/2024 11,664,900 21.32 30/07/2024 5,043,700 21.32 29/07/2024 6,957,300 21.59 26/07/2024 4,545,900 21.05 25/07/2024 3,459,800 20.80 24/07/2024 4,999,700 20.94 23/07/2024 4,914,800 21.10 22/07/2024 12,480,400 20.99 19/07/2024 14,977,400 20.81 18/07/2024 3,128,700 22.59 17/07/2024 3,547,000 22.52 16/07/2024 3,119,400 22.50 15/07/2024 4,555,900 22.46 12/07/2024 5,194,400 21.96 11/07/2024 7,390,600 21.93 10/07/2024 4,673,800 22.15 09/07/2024 3,998,200 22.78 08/07/2024 3,996,400 22.83 05/07/2024 4,412,000 22.90 04/07/2024 7,568,700 22.75 03/07/2024 7,712,500 23.61 02/07/2024 9

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 6,739,100 23.02 01/07/2024 10,608,800 22.67 28/06/2024 9,507,500 22.05 27/06/2024 7,054,400 21.10 26/06/2024 8,574,300 20.80 25/06/2024 8,893,500 20.73 24/06/2024 11,519,600 20.55 21/06/2024 8,194,200 20.31 20/06/2024 14,485,300 20.02 19/06/2024 11,320,100 19.19 18/06/2024 5,231,100 18.19 17/06/2024 3,636,500 18.63 14/06/2024 4,509,800 18.60 13/06/2024 7,771,000 18.78 12/06/2024 8,410,000 19.00 11/06/2024 8,065,800 18.39 10/06/2024 7,650,300 18.33 07/06/2024 7,589,300 18.44 06/06/2024 6,987,800 18.32 05/06/2024 11,507,800 18.05 04/06/2024 4,340,600 18.71 03/06/2024 72,717,900 18.58 31/05/2024 7,761,000 19.04 29/05/2024 8,697,600 19.14 28/05/2024 4,450,400 19.33 27/05/2024 8,110,200 19.08 24/05/2024 7,707,400 19.23 23/05/2024 10

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 10,726,500 19.21 22/05/2024 10,154,300 19.61 21/05/2024 12,524,200 19.65 20/05/2024 11,293,800 19.36 17/05/2024 13,615,600 19.15 16/05/2024 11,281,200 18.54 15/05/2024 5,259,900 18.29 14/05/2024 10,690,200 18.13 13/05/2024 19,010,800 18.32 10/05/2024 13,316,300 18.91 09/05/2024 35,456,700 18.51 08/05/2024 16,033,100 16.65 07/05/2024 18,787,700 16.18 06/05/2024 32,361,200 16.72 03/05/2024 10,899,000 16.71 02/05/2024 6,185,900 16.88 30/04/2024 7,512,000 17.24 29/04/2024 4,845,500 17.45 26/04/2024 6,938,700 17.27 25/04/2024 7,749,900 17.19 24/04/2024 8,382,200 17.37 23/04/2024 7,042,300 17.16 22/04/2024 8,568,100 17.05 19/04/2024 8,810,400 17.05 18/04/2024 12,181,500 17.07 17/04/2024 10,694,400 17.78 16/04/2024 24,298,300 17.90 15/04/2024 11

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 12,563,000 16.25 12/04/2024 7,628,100 16.90 11/04/2024 9,299,300 16.88 10/04/2024 7,907,800 17.26 09/04/2024 5,406,700 16.79 08/04/2024 7,626,600 16.17 05/04/2024 7,905,700 15.97 04/04/2024 5,746,000 16.02 03/04/2024 6,456,200 15.97 02/04/2024 5,681,400 16.00 01/04/2024 7,129,400 16.32 28/03/2024 7,243,600 15.78 27/03/2024 5,487,400 15.97 26/03/2024 4,347,600 16.28 25/03/2024 7,174,700 16.30 22/03/2024 5,235,400 16.67 21/03/2024 6,509,700 16.82 20/03/2024 10,248,300 16.76 19/03/2024 8,946,600 16.34 18/03/2024 31,237,800 16.46 15/03/2024 7,253,400 17.28 14/03/2024 6,867,900 16.99 13/03/2024 9,693,900 17.02 12/03/2024 5,780,300 16.61 11/03/2024 8,077,100 16.70 08/03/2024 7,622,400 16.38 07/03/2024 8,989,400 16.14 06/03/2024 12

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 12,240,500 15.94 05/03/2024 10,251,100 15.30 04/03/2024 8,196,500 14.87 01/03/2024 11,784,200 15.10 29/02/2024 17,851,400 15.21 28/02/2024 33,280,800 15.15 27/02/2024 14,325,100 14.01 26/02/2024 8,875,800 13.50 23/02/2024 6,218,900 13.86 22/02/2024 8,619,800 13.93 21/02/2024 5,578,100 13.91 20/02/2024 2,522,700 14.15 19/02/2024 4,702,500 14.29 16/02/2024 6,119,600 14.33 15/02/2024 4,382,500 14.18 14/02/2024 4,407,200 14.48 09/02/2024 5,756,900 14.54 08/02/2024 4,868,700 14.81 07/02/2024 5,162,600 14.85 06/02/2024 4,632,400 14.49 05/02/2024 6,263,500 14.33 02/02/2024 7,867,500 14.33 01/02/2024 10,045,800 13.95 31/01/2024 5,755,500 13.75 30/01/2024 4,050,400 14.26 29/01/2024 6,917,600 14.61 26/01/2024 4,709,900 14.47 25/01/2024 13

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 9,424,500 14.15 24/01/2024 13,523,900 14.61 23/01/2024 18,872,500 13.64 22/01/2024 10,529,700 13.00 19/01/2024 7,574,600 12.41 18/01/2024 10,201,600 12.57 17/01/2024 12,673,700 13.03 16/01/2024 3,193,000 13.13 15/01/2024 9,557,600 12.87 12/01/2024 6,377,600 12.50 11/01/2024 6,899,200 12.68 10/01/2024 6,912,300 12.72 09/01/2024 8,423,800 12.70 08/01/2024 6,854,400 12.76 05/01/2024 9,288,200 12.57 04/01/2024 12,394,100 12.60 03/01/2024 6,509,100 13.25 02/01/2024 14 Source: S&P Capital IQ Pro.

ATTACHMENT 2

Cash Flow on Invested Capital Cash flow generated by the company to be reverted to lenders (interest and amortizations) and shareholders (dividends) after consideration of cost and operating expenses and capital investments. Cash - Generating Unit Smallest identifiable group of assets generating cash inflows that are largely independent on inputs generated by other assets or groups of assets. Casualty An event that causes financial loss. CFC (Conselho Federal de Contabilidade) Brazilian Accounting Committee. Company Commercial or industrial entity, service provider or investment entity holding economic activities. Conservation Status Physical status of an asset asa result of its maintenance. Control Power to direct the strategic policy and administrative management of a company. Control Premium Value or percentage of the pro - rata value of a lot of controlling shares over the pro - rata value of noncontrolling shares, which reflect the control power. Cost Thetotal direct and indirect costs necessary for production, maintenance or acquisition of an assetat aparticular time and situation. GLOSSARY Asset Approach Valuation of companies where all assets (including those not accounted for) have their values adjusted to the market . Also known as market net equity . B Basic Infrastructure Urban rainwater drainage equipment, street lighting, sewage system, drinking water, public and home electricity supply and access routes. BDI (Budget Difference Income) A percentage that indicates the benefits and overhead costs applied to the direct cost of construction. Best Use of the Property Themost economically appropriate use of a certain property according to its characteristics and surroundings, respecting legal limitations. Beta A systematic risk measure of a share; price trend of a particular share to be correlated with changes in a given index. Book Value The value at which an asset or liability is recognized on the balance sheet. Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) The BOMA Standard measures buildings on a buildingwide basis. It introduces the concept of Building Common Area (areas common to all of the tenants in a building). Building Standard The quality of the improvements according to the specifications of design, materials, workmanship and performance effectively used in construction. Business Combination Union of separate entities or businesses producing financial statements of a single reporting entity. Transaction or other event by which an acquirer obtains control of one or more businesses, regardless of the legal form of operation. Business Risk Uncertainty of realization of expected future returns of the business resulting from factors other than financial leverage. C CAPEX(Capital Expenditure) Fixed asset investments. CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing Model) Model in which the capital cost for any share or lot of shares equals the risk free rate plus risk premium provided by the systematic risk of the share or lot of shares under investigation. Generally used to calculate the Cost of Equity or the Cost of Shareholder Capital. Capital Structure Composition of a company’s invested capital, between own capital (equity) and third - party capital (debt). Cash Flow Cashgenerated by an asset, group of assets or business during a given period of time. Usually the term is supplemented by a qualification referring to the context (operating, nonoperating, etc.) A ABL Gross Leasable Area. ABNT (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas) Brazilian Technical Standards Association. Allocated Codes Serial number (grades or weights) to differentiate the quality features of properties. Allotment Subdivision of a tract of land into lots for buildings with the opening of new thoroughfares, or the extension, modification or expansion of existing ones. Amortization Systematic allocation of the depreciable value of an asset over its useful life. Apparent Age Estimated age of a property according to its characteristic and conservation status at the time of inspection. Asset Aresource controlled by the entity asa result of past events from which future economic benefits are expected for the entity. 1

Cost of Capital Expected rate of return required by the market as an attraction to certain investment funds. 2 CPC (Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis) Accounting Pronouncements Committee. Current Value Value replacement with a new value depreciated as a result of the physical state the property is in. CVM Securities and Exchange Commission. D Data Treatment Application of operations to express, in relative terms, the attribute differences between the market data and data of the property being assessed. Date of Issue Closing date of the valuation report, when conclusions are conveyed to the client. DCF (Discounted Cash Flow) Discounted cash flow. D&A Depreciation and amortization. Dependent Variable Variable to be explained by the independent ones. . Depreciable Value Cost of the asset, or other amount that substitutes such cost (financial statements), less its residual value. Depreciation Systematic allocation of the depreciable value of an asset during its useful life. Dichotomous Variable Variable that assumes only two values. Direct Production Cost Spending on inputs, including labor, in the production of goods. Discount Rate Any divisor used to convert a flow of future economic benefits into present value. E EBIT (Earnings before Interest and Taxes) Earnings before interest and taxes. EBITDA (Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Economic Benefits Benefits such as revenue, net profit, net cash flow, etc. Efficient Use That which is recommendable and technically possible for the location on a reference date, among the various uses permitted by the applicable law, observing surrounding marketing trends. Electrical Damage Value Estimated cost of the repair or replacement of parts, when the property suffers electrical damage. Values are tabulated in percentages of the Replacement Value and have been calculated through the study of equipment manuals and the expertise in corrective maintenance of Apsis technicians. Enterprise Setof properties capable of producing revenue through marketing or economicexploitation. It can be: real estate (e.g. subdivision, commercial/ residential buildings), real - estate based (e.g., hotel, shopping mall, themeparks), industrial or rural. Enterprise Value Economic value of the company. Equity Value Economic value of the equity. Equivalent Construction Area Constructed area on which the unit cost equivalence of corresponding construction is applied, according to ABNT postulates. Equivalent Depth Numerical result of the division of a lot area by its main projected front. Expertise Technical activity performed by a professional with specific expertise to investigate and clarify facts, check the status of property, investigate the causes that motivated a particular event, appraise assets, their costs, results or rights. F Facilities Set of materials, systems, networks, equipment and operational support services for a single machine, production line or plant, according to the degree of aggregation. Fair Market Value Value at which an asset could have its ownership exchanged between a potential seller and a potential buyer, when both parties have reasonable knowledge of relevant facts and neither is under pressure to do so. Fair Value Less Cost to Sell Value that can be obtained from the sale of an asset or cash - generating unit less sale expenses, in a transaction between knowledgeable, willing and uninterested parties. FCFF (Free Cash Flow to Firm) Freecash flow to firm, or unlevered free cash flow. Financial Lease That which substantially transfers all the risks and benefits related to the ownership of the asset, which may or may not eventually be transferred. Leases that are not financial leases are classified as operating leases. Fixed Asset Tangible asset available for use in the production or supply of goodsor services, in third - party leasing, investments, or for management purposes, expected to be used for more than one accounting period.

Forced Liquidation Conditiononthepossibility ofacompulsorysaleorinashorter period than theaverageabsorptionbythemarket. 3 G Goodwill See Premium for Expected Future Profitability. H Homogenization Treatment of observed prices by application of mathematical transformations that express, in relative terms, the differences between market data attributes and those of the property assessed. Homogenization Area Useful or private area, or built with mathematical treatments for valuation purposes, according to criteria based on the real estate market. I IAS (International Accounting Standards) Principles - based standards, interpretations and the framework adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). See International Accounting Standards. IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) International Accounting Standards Board. Standard setting body responsible for the development of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). Ideal Fraction Percentage owned by each of the buyers (tenants) of the land IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) International Financial Reporting Standards, a set of international accounting pronouncements published and reviewed by the IASB. IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) International Financial Reporting Standards, a set of international accounting pronouncements published and reviewed by the IASB. Impairment See Impairment losses. Impairment Losses(impairment) Book value of the asset that exceeds, in the case of stocks, its selling price less the cost to complete it and expenseof selling it; or, in the caseof other assets, their fair value less expenditure for sale. Income Approach Valuation method for converting the present value of expected economic benefits. Independent Variables Variables that provide a logical content to the formation of the value of the property subject to the assessment. Indirect Production Cost Administrative and financial costs, benefits and other liens and charges necessary for the production of goods. party undertakes, subject to payment of premium, to indemnify another for the occurrence of casualties covered under the policy. Insurance Investment Property Risk transfer guaranteed by contract whereby one Property (land, building or building part, or both) Insurance Value Value at which an insurance company assumes the risks. Except in special cases, it is not applied to land and foundations. Intangible Asset Identifiable non - monetary asset without physical substance. This asset is identifiable when: a) it is separable, i.e., capable of being separated or divided from the entity and sold, transferred, licensed, leased or exchanged, either alone or together with the related contract, asset or liability; b) it arises from contractual or other legal rights, regardless of whether those rights are transferable or separable from the entity or from other rights and obligations. Internal Rate of Return Discount rate where the present value of future cash flow is equivalent to the cost of investment . International Accounting Standards (IAS) Standards and interpretations adopted by the IASB. They include: International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) International Accounting Standards (IAS) and interpretations developed by the Interpretation Committee on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRIC) or by the former Standing Interpretations Committee (SIC). held by the owner or lessee under the lease, both to receive payment of rent and for capital appreciation or both, other than for use in the production or supply of goods or services, as well as for administrative purposes. Investment Value Value for a particular investor based on individual interests in the property in question. In the case of business valuation, this value can be analyzed by different situations, such as the synergy with other companies of an investor, risk perceptions, future performance and tax planning. IVSC International Valuation Standards Council. K Key Money Amount paid by the prospective tenant for signature or transfer of the lease contract, as compensation for the point of sale. Key Variables Variables that, a priori, and traditionally have been important for the formation of property value. L Levered Beta Beta value reflecting the debt in capital structure.

Liability Present obligation that arises from past events, whereby it is hoped that the settlement thereof will result in the inflow of funds from the entity embodying economic benefits. 4 Liquidity Ability to rapidly convert certain assets into cash or into the payment of a certain debt. M Market Approach Valuation method in which multiple comparisons derived from the sales price of similar assets are adopted. Market Data Set of information collected on the market related to a particular property. Market Research Set of activities for identification, investigation, collection, selection, processing, analysis and interpretation of results on market data. Marketing Factor The ratio between the market value of an asset and its reproduction cost less depreciation or replacement cost, which may be higher or lower than 1 (one). Maximum Insurance Value Maximum value of the property for which it is recommendable to insure it. This criterion establishes that the property whose depreciation is greater than 50% should have its Maximum Insurance. Value equivalent to twice as much as the Current Value; and the property whose depreciation is with less than 50% should have its Maximum Insurance Value equivalent to the Replacement Value. Multiple Market value of a company, share or invested capital, divided by a valuation measurement of the company (EBITDA, income, customer volume, etc.). N Net Debt Cash and cash equivalents, net position in derivatives, short - term and long - term financial debts, dividends receivable and payable, receivables and payables related to debentures, short - term and long - term deficits with pension funds, provisions, and other credits and obligations to related parties, including subscription bonus. Non - Operating Assets Those not directly related to the company’s operations (may or may not generate revenue) and that can be disposed of without detriment to its business. O Operating Assets Assets that are basic to the company’s operations. Operating Lease That which does not substantially transfer all the risks and benefits incidental to the ownership of the asset. Leases that are not operating leases are classified as financial leases. P Parent Company An entity that has one or more subsidiaries. Percentual Value Value at the end of the projective period to be added on the cash flow. Point of Sale Intangible asset that adds value to commercial property, due to its location and expected commercial exploitation. Population Total market data of the segment to be analyzed. Premium for Expected Future Profitability (goodwill) Future economic benefits arising from assets not capable of being individually identified or separately recognized . Present Value The estimated present value of discounted net cash flows in the normal course of business. Price The amount by which a transaction is performed involving a property, a product or the right thereto. Private Area Useful area plus building blocks (such as walls, pillars, etc.) and elevator hallway (in specific cases). Property Something of value, subject to use, or that may be the object of a right, which integrates an equity. Q Qualitative Variables Variables that cannot be measured or counted, only ordered or ranked, according to attributes inherent to the property (e . g . , building standard, conservation status and quality of the soil) . Quantitative Variables Variables that can be measured or counted (e.g., private area, number of bedrooms and parking spaces). R Range for Real Estate Valuations Rangein the vicinity of the point estimator adopted in the valuation within which to arbitrate the value of the property, provided it is justified by the existence of features that are not contemplated in the model. Rd (Cost of Debt) A measure of the amount paid for the capital earned from third parties, in the form of loans, financing, market funding, among others. Re (Cost of Equity) Return required by shareholders for the capital invested. Real Estate Property, consisting of land and any improvements incorporated thereto . Can be classified as urban or rural, depending on its location, use or to its highest and best use .

Recoverable Value The highest fair value of an asset (or cashgenerating unit) minus the cost of sales compared with its value in use. 5 Reference Real Estate Market data with features comparable to the property assessed. Regression Model The model used to represent a specific phenomenon, based on a sample, considering the various influencing characteristics. Remaining Life A property’s remaining life. Replacement Cost A property’s reproduction cost less depreciation, with the same function and features comparable to the property assessed. Replacement Value for New Value based on what the property would cost (usually in relation to current market prices) to be replaced with or substituted by a new, equal or similar property. Reproduction Cost Expense required for the exact duplication of a property, regardless of any depreciation. Reproduction Cost Less Depreciation A property’s reproduction cost less depreciation, considering the state it is in. Residual Value Value of new or used asset projected for a date limited to that in which it becomes scrap, considering its being in operation during the period. Residual Value of an Asset Estimated value that the entity would obtain at present with the sale of the asset, after deducting the estimated costs thereof, if the asset were already at the expected age and condition at the end of its useful life . S Sample Set of market data representative of a population. Scrap Value Market value of a property’s reusable materials in disabling conditions, without their being used for production purposes . Shareholders’ Equity at Market Prices See Assets Approach. Statistical Inference Part of statistical science that allows drawing conclusions about the population from a sample. Subsidiary Entity, including that with no legal character, such as an association, controlled by another entity (known as the parent company). Supporting Documentation Documentation raised and provided by the client on which the report premises are based. Survey Evidence of local events through insightful observations in a property and of the factors and conditions that constitute or influence it. T Tangible Asset Physically existing asset, such as land, building, machinery, equipment, furniture and tools. Technical Report Detailed report or technical clarification issued by a legally qualified and trained professional on a specific subject. Technical Term of Responsibility Required document, which defines the responsible engineer for a product or service. Total Construction Area Resulting from the sum of the real private area and the common area allocated to an independent unit, defined according to ABNT. U Urbanizable Land Land eligible to receive urban infrastructure works aiming at its efficient use, by means of the subdivision, split or implementation of a business. Useful Area Real private area subtracted from the area occupied by walls and other building blocks that prevent or hinder its use. Useful Economic Life The period in which an asset is expected to be available for use, or the number of production or similar units expected to be obtained from the asset by the entity. V Valuation Act or process of determining the value of an asset. Valuation Date Specific date (day, month and year) of application of the assessment value. Valuation Methodology One or more approaches used in developing evaluative calculations for the indication of the value of an asset. Value at Risk Representative value of the share of the property one wishes to insure and that may correspond to the maximum insurable value . Value in Use Value of a property in operating conditions in its present state, such as the useful part of an industry, including, where relevant, the costs of design, packaging, taxes, freight and installation.

Value of a business in forced liquidation Value of a property offered for sale on the market outside the normal process, i.e. one that would be established if the property were offered for sale separately, taking into account the costs involved and the discount required for a sale in a reduced period. Value of a business in immediate liquidation The compulsory liquidation refers to a business forced into liquidation by way of a winding - up petition presented to the court. More aggressive than forced liquidation. Value Plan The graphic representation or listing of generic square meter values of land or of the real estate on the same date. W WACC WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital) Model in which capital cost is determined by the weighted average of the market value of capital structure components (own and others). WARA Weighted Average Return on Assets (WARA), Weighted average rate of return expected for the assets and liabilities that make up the company under analysis, including goodwill. 6

1 Rio de Janeiro +55 21 2212 - 6850 apsis.rj@apsis.com.br São Paulo 55 11 4550 - 2701 apsis.sp@apsis.com.br Minas Gerais +55 31 98299 - 6678 apsis.mg@apsis.com.br apsis.com.br

Annex 4.5

264 Appraisal Report

(This annex begins on the following page.)

(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.)

APPRAISAL REPORT AP - 00475/25 - 01 Marfrig Global Foods S.A. BRF S.A.

APPRAISAL REPORT: AP - 00475/25 - 01 VALUATION DATE: December 31 st , 2024 1 REQUESTER: MARFRIG GLOBAL FOODS S.A., hereinafter referred to as MARFRIG. Publicly held corporation, headquartered at Av. Queiroz Filho, No. 1.560, Bloco 5, Sabiá Tower, 3 rd Floor, Room 301, Vila Hamburguesa, City and State of São Paulo, registered with the CNPJ under No. 03.853.896/0001 - 40. OBJECTS: MARFRIG, previously qualified, and BRF S.A., hereinafter referred to as BRF. Publicly held corporation, headquartered at Rua Jorge Tzachel, No. 475, Fazenda, City of Itajaí, State of Santa Catarina, registered with the CNPJ under No. 01.838.723/0001 - 27. OBJECTIVE: Calculation of the value of MARFRIG and BRF shares using the Adjusted Net Asset Method, based on the same criteria and on the same date, for the purpose of complying with article 264 of Law No. 6,404 (Brazilian Corporation Law).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APSIS CONSULTORIA E AVALIAÇÕES LTDA . , hereinafter referred to as APSIS, was appointed by MARFRIG to determine the share exchange ratio of MARFRIG and BRF, based on the Adjusted Net Asset method, according to the same criteria and on the same dates, of both companies, in compliance with article 264 of Law No . 6 , 040 / 76 . MARFRIG intends to carry out a corporate reorganization, which will consist of the merger of BRF shares . As this is a transaction involving controlling and controlled companies, it is necessary to calculate the exchange ratio of the shares of the subsidiary’s non - controlling shareholders based on the shareholders' equity value of the shares of the parent company and the subsidiary, valuing the two assets according to the same criteria and on the same date, at market prices, to comply with article 264 of the Brazilian Corporation Law . The technical procedures used in this Report are in accordance with the criteria established by valuation standards . The Adjusted Net Asset Value methodology is based on the analysis of the assets and liabilities recorded in the company's balance sheet, adjusted to the amount that a potential market participant would pay to obtain such assets or assume such liabilities . 2

SUMMARY OF RESULTS (ADJUSTED NET ASSET METHOD) ▪ MARFRIG (pro forma balance sheet) The Balance Sheet below presents the reconciliation, made available by MARFRIG's management, between MARFRIG's consolidated accounting balances as of December 31 st , 2024 (see December 31 st , 2024 Financial Statements available on MARFRIG's IR website) and the balances used in the Pro Forma Balance Sheet to carry out the valuation . The adjustments consisted of reversing the consolidation of BRF in MARFRIG, followed by the recognition of BRF using the equity method (MEP) . These adjustments aim to isolate the effects of the investee in the consolidated financial statements, enabling the identification and measurement of the fair value adjustment (step up and down) to determine the net equity value, for the purpose of determining the share exchange ratio in the context of the corporate transaction . 3

ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED ADJUSTMENTS – MARFRIG ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – CONSOLIDATED MARFRIG BALANCE SHEET (BRL '000) AS OF DEC 2024 AS OF DEC 2024 AS OF DEC 2024 24,193,465 (30,741,201) 54,934,666 CURRENT ASSETS 3,132,017 (1,384,670) 4,516,687 Cash and cash equivalents 7,328,054 (10,674,774) 18,002,828 Short - term Investments 3,190,093 (5,985,721) 9,175,814 Accounts Receivable from Customers 4,754,934 (6,728,004) 11,482,938 Inventories of Products and Goods 81,788 (2,844,633) 2,926,421 Biological Assets 1,021,136 (2,214,189) 3,235,325 & R e c o v e r ab l e Taxes 249,540 (176,290) 425,830 Prepaid Expenses 27,150 (32,302) 59,452 Receivables from Securities 2,705,326 (34,076) 2,739,402 Advances to Suppliers 1,422,058 - 1,422,058 & A s s e t s Held for Sale 21,936 (63,033) 84,969 Derivative Financial Instruments - (851) 851 Dividends Receivable - (276,025) 276,025 Restricted Cash 259,433 (326,633) 586,066 Other Receivables 38,021,788 (44,553,687) 82,575,473 NON - CURRENT ASSETS 8,814,149 (13,162,635) 21,976,784 LONG - TERM RECEIVABLES - (323,811) 323,811 Financial Investments and Marketable Securities - (22,620) 22,620 & T r ad e Receivables 65,168 (422,333) 487,501 Judicial Deposits 5,596,057 (4,545,441) 10,141,498 Recoverable Taxes 600 (8,035) 8,635 Receivables from Securities - (60,790) 60,790 Restricted Cash 2,145,943 (2,331,012) 4,476,955 Deferred Income Tax and Social Contribution 12 (251,570) 251,582 Derivative Financial Instruments 28,984 (221,015) 249,999 Other Receivables - (1,787,237) 1,787,237 Biological Assets 116,794 - 116,794 Investment Properties 860,591 (3,188,771) 4,049,362 Right - of - Use Asset 13,322,664 13,097,821 224,843 INVESTMENTS 9,895,617 (31,350,498) 41,246,113 FIXED ASSETS 5,989,358 (13,138,375) 19,127,733 INTANGIBLE ASSETS 62,215,253 (75,294,888) 137,510,139 TOTAL ASSETS 4

ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED ADJUSTMENTS – MARFRIG ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – CONSOLIDATED MARFRIG BALANCE SHEET (BRL '000) AS OF DEC 2024 AS OF DEC 2024 AS OF DEC 2024 22,289,358 (20,676,417) 42,965,775 CURRENT LIABILITIES 6,792,852 (13,468,993) 20,261,845 Suppliers 699,564 (1,652,329) 2,351,893 Labor liabilities 94,718 (1,141,943) 1,236,661 Tax liabilities 7,177,442 (1,175,409) 8,352,851 Loans, Financing and Debentures 2,547 (218,106) 220,653 Payables from Securities 189,653 (1,014,813) 1,204,466 Lease Liabilities 5,613,410 (475,650) 6,089,060 Advances from Customers 767,344 - 767,344 & L i ab ili t i es Related to Assets Held for Sale 91,646 (692,650) 784,296 Provision for Contingencies 67,969 (382,976) 450,945 & D e r i v a t i v e Financial Instruments 1,106 (1,686) 2,792 Dividends Payable 791,107 (451,862) 1,242,969 Other Liabilities 36,409,929 (38,196,322) 74,606,252 NON - CURRENT LIABILITIES 36,409,929 (38,196,322) 74,606,252 LONG - TERM PAYABLES 33,679,605 (19,091,175) 52,770,780 Loans, Financing and Debentures 180,448 (77,854) 258,302 Tax liabilities 193,270 (8,562,677) 8,755,947 Deferred Income Tax and Social Contribution* 368,573 (6,238,842) 6,607,415 Provision for Contingencies 713,618 (2,978,116) 3,691,734 Lease Liabilities - (39,156) 39,156 Payables from Securities - (11,767) 11,767 Suppliers - (467,127) 467,127 Labor liabilities 1,179,321 (236,206) 1,415,527 & D e r i v a t i v e Financial Instruments 95,094 (493,402) 588,497 Other Liabilities 3,515,963 (16,422,149) 19,938,112 SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY 10,367,391 - 10,367,391 Share Capital (3,524,168) (1,382,732) (2,141,436) Capital Reserve and Treasury Shares 624,664 - 624,664 Legal Reserve 964,286 - 964,286 Tax Incentive Reserve 2,637,330 - 2,637,330 Retained Earnings Reserve (9,252,605) 375,486 (9,628,091) Other Comprehensive Results 1,699,065 (15,414,903) 17,113,968 Non - controlling Interests - - Market adjustments 62,215,251 (75,294,888) 137,510,139 TOTAL LIABILITIES 5 1,816,898 (1,007,246) 2,824,144 SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY - CONTROLLING (BRL '000) * BRF’s Shareholders’ Equity at Market Value is already net of deferred income tax on the fair value adjustments recognized in the balance sheet

▪ MARFRIG (Balance Sheet at Market Value) The following table presents MARFRIG's Shareholders’ Equity at Market Value, based on the pro - forma view mentioned above, and the effect of the fair value adjustments arising from the market valuation of the accounting balances presented, explained in detail throughout this report. 6

ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – PRO FORMA MARKET VALUE ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – PRO FORMA MARFRIG BALANCE SHEET (BRL '000) AS OF DEC 2024 ADJUSTMENTS AS OF DEC 2024 24,314,424.0 120,958.8 24,193,465.1 CURRENT ASSETS 3,132,017.0 - 3,132,017.0 Cash and cash equivalents 7,328,054.0 - 7,328,054.0 Short - term Investments 3,190,093.0 3,190,093.0 Accounts Receivable from Customers 4,855,606.8 100,672.8 4,754,934.0 Inventories of Products and Goods 81,788.0 81,788.0 Biological Assets 1,021,136.0 1,021,136.0 & R e c o v e r ab l e Taxes 249,540.0 249,540.0 Prepaid Expenses 27,150.0 27,150.0 Receivables from Securities 2,705,326.0 - 2,705,326.0 Advances to Suppliers 1,442,344.0 20,286.0 1,422,058.0 &Assets Held for Sale 21,936.0 - 21,936.0 Derivative Financial Instruments 259,433.1 - 259,433.1 Other Receivables 46,350,695.9 8,328,908.2 38,021,787.7 NON - CURRENT ASSETS 8,814,148.9 - 8,814,148.9 LONG - TERM RECEIVABLES 65,168.0 65,168.0 Judicial Deposits 5,596,057.0 5,596,057.0 Recoverable Taxes 600.0 600.0 Receivables from Securities 2,145,943.0 - 2,145,943.0 Deferred Income Tax and Social Contribution 12.0 - 12.0 Derivative Financial Instruments 28,983.9 - 28,983.9 Other Receivables 116,794.0 116,794.0 Investment Properties 860,591.0 860,591.0 Right - of - Use Asset 16,165,803.8 2,843,140.0 13,322,663.8 INVESTMENTS 16,070,242.8 2,843,140.0 13,227,102.8 Investments in Subsidiaries and Associates 95,561.0 - 95,561.0 Other Investments 11,588,029.1 1,692,412.1 9,895,617.0 FIXED ASSETS 4,438,833.7 232,167.7 4,206,666.0 Buildings and Improvements 4,983,276.2 1,418,546.2 3,564,730.0 Machinery, Equipment, Furniture and Fixtures 1,446,326.0 - 1,446,326.0 Construction in Progress 671,893.4 79,344.4 592,549.0 Others 47,699.8 (37,646.3) 85,346.0 &Land 9,782,714.1 3,793,356.1 5,989,358.0 INTANGIBLE ASSETS - (1,404,184.0) 1,404,184.0 &Goodwill - (149,271.0) 149,271.0 &Distribution Channels 43,934.0 - 43,934.0 &Software and Licenses 3,923,825.8 2,547,117.8 1,376,708.0 &Trademarks and Patents 1,806,976.5 445,123.5 1,361,853.0 &Customer Relationships 4,007,977.8 2,354,569.8 1,653,408.0 &Supplier Relationships 70,665,119.9 8,449,867.0 62,215,252.9 TOTAL ASSETS 7

ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – PRO FORMA MARKET VALUE ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – PRO FORMA MARFRIG BALANCE SHEET (BRL '000) AS OF DEC 2024 ADJUSTMENTS AS OF DEC 2024 22,289,358.5 - 22,289,358.5 CURRENT LIABILITIES 6,792,852.0 - 6,792,852.0 Suppliers 699,564.0 - 699,564.0 Labor liabilities 94,718.0 - 94,718.0 Tax liabilities 7,177,442.0 - 7,177,442.0 Loans, Financing and Debentures 2,547.0 - 2,547.0 Payables from Securities 189,653.0 - 189,653.0 Lease Liabilities 5,613,410.0 - 5,613,410.0 Advances from Customers 767,344.0 767,344.0 &Liabilities Related to Assets Held for Sale 91,646.0 91,646.0 Provision for Contingencies 67,969.0 67,969.0 & D e r i v a t i v e Financial Instruments 1,106.0 1,106.0 Dividends Payable 791,107.5 - 791,107.5 Other Liabilities 39,020,940.5 2,611,011.0 36,409,929.4 NON - CURRENT LIABILITIES 39,020,940.5 2,611,011.0 36,409,929.4 LONG - TERM PAYABLES 33,679,605.0 - 33,679,605.0 Loans, Financing and Debentures 180,448.0 180,448.0 Tax liabilities 1,736,517.9 1,543,247.9 193,270.0 Deferred Income Tax and Social Contribution* 1,436,336.1 1,067,763.1 368,573.0 Provision for Contingencies 713,618.0 713,618.0 Lease Liabilities 1,179,321.0 - 1,179,321.0 & D e r i v a t i v e Financial Instruments 95,094.4 - 95,094.4 Other Liabilities 9,354,818.7 5,838,856.0 3,515,962.7 SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY 10,367,391.0 - 10,367,391.0 Share Capital (3,524,168.0) - (3,524,168.0) Capital Reserve and Treasury Shares 624,664.0 - 624,664.0 Legal Reserve 964,286.0 - 964,286.0 Tax Incentive Reserve 2,637,330.0 - 2,637,330.0 Retained Earnings Reserve (9,252,605.0) (9,252,605.0) Other Comprehensive Results 1,882,345.2 183,280.4 1,699,064.7 Non - controlling Interests 5,655,575.5 5,655,575.5 Market adjustments 70,665,117.7 8,449,867.0 62,215,250.7 TOTAL LIABILITIES 7,472,473.5 5,655,575.5 1,816,898.0 SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY - CONTROLLING (BRL '000) R$ 8.79 R$ 6.66 R$ 2.14 SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY - CONTROLLING (R$ per share) QUANTITIES OF MARFRIG SHARES - EX. TREASURY SHARES 849,668,056 * BRF’s Shareholders’ Equity at Market Value is already net of deferred income tax on the fair value adjustments recognized in the balance sheet 8

▪ BRF (Balance Sheet at Market Value) The following table presents BRF's Shareholders' Equity at Market Value, based on the consolidated view according to BRF's consolidated financial statement as of December 31 st , 2024, and the effect of fair value adjustments arising from the market valuation of the accounting balances presented, explained in detail throughout this report. 9

ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS BALANCES AT DEC 2024 MARKET VALUE ADJUSTMENTS ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS BALANCES AT DEC 2024 BALANCE SHEET BRF (BRL '000) 31,568,239 738,024 30,830,215 CURRENTS ASSETS 11,165,364 - 11,165,364 Cash and cash equivalents 894,080 - 894,080 Bonds and securities 6,107,292 - 6,107,292 Accounts receivable 7,466,026 738,024 6,728,002 Inventory 2,214,189 - 2,214,189 Recoverable taxes 2,844,633 - 2,844,633 Biological assets 851 - 851 Prepaid expenses 875,804 - 875,804 Other current assets 63,499,107 31,654,240 31,844,867 NON - CURRENT ASSETS 9,974,145 - 9,974,145 LONG - TERM REALISABLE 2,331,012 - 2,331,012 Deferred taxes LT 4,545,723 - 4,545,723 Recoverable taxes LT 30,655 - 30,655 Accounts receivable LT 323,811 - 323,811 Bonds and securities LT 955,707 - 955,707 Other non current assets 1,787,237 - 1,787,237 Biological assets 129,323 - 129,323 INVESTIMENTS 129,323 - 129,323 Holdings in subsidiaries and associates 37,404,850 25,525,391 11,879,459 FIXED ASSETS 2,612,212 1,984,312 627,900 Land 15,578,119 10,134,901 5,443,218 Buildings and Facilities 18,397,962 13,403,704 4,994,258 Machinery and equipment 150,791 2,487 148,304 Furniture and Utensils 1,004 (13) 1,017 Vehicles 645,621 - 645,621 Fixed Assets in Progress 19,720 - 19,720 Advances to suppliers (579) - (579) Others 12,802,019 6,128,849 6,673,170 INTANGIBLE ASSETS - (3,771,263) 3,771,263 Goodwill 10,753,098 8,746,831 2,006,267 Trademark - (2,551) 2,551 Non - compete agreements 1,411,973 1,411,973 - Integrated Supplier Relationship 1,237 - 1,237 Patents 364,155 (256,141) 620,296 Customer relationship 233,865 - 233,865 Software 37,691 - 37,691 Other intangible assets 3,188,770 - 3,188,770 FIXED ASSETS RIGHT OF USE 3,188,770 - 3,188,770 Ridght of Use 95,067,346 32,392,264 62,675,082 TOTAL ASSETS 10

ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS MARKET VALUE ADJUSTMENTS ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS BALANCE SHEET BRF (BRL '000) BALANCES AT DEC 2024 BALANCES AT DEC 2024 20,820,572 - 20,820,572 CURRENT LIABILITIES 1,230,273 - 1,230,273 Loans and financing 14,573,097 - 14,573,097 Suppliers 1,141,944 - 1,141,944 Tax obligations 946,937 - 946,937 Wages, benefits and social charges payable 692,650 - 692,650 Provisions 2,235,671 - 2,235,671 Other payables 40,815,571 15,460,276 25,355,295 NON - CURRENT LIABILITIES 40,815,571 15,460,276 25,355,295 LONG - TERM LIABILITIES 19,510,275 - 19,510,275 Loans and financing LT 2,989,882 - 2,989,882 Suppliers LT 1,933 - 1,933 Deferred tax liabilities LT 8,277,200 6,737,736 1,539,464 Provision for contingencies LT 467,127 - 467,127 Benefits LT 846,614 846,614 Other non current liabilities 8,722,539 8,722,539 - Deferred income tax capital gains 33,431,193 16,931,988 16,499,205 SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY 13,349,156 - 13,349,156 Share capital 2,621,755 - 2,621,755 Capital reserve 2,079,253 - 2,079,253 Profit reserve (1,345,657) - (1,345,657) Treasury Shares (1,618,855) - (1,618,855) Other Comprehensive Income 1,602,941 189,388 1,413,553 Attributed to non - controlling shareholders 16,742,600 16,742,600 - Market Adjustments 95,067,336 32,392,264 62,675,072 TOTAL LIABILITIES 31,828,252 16,742,600 15,085,652 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY - CONTROLLING (BRL' 000) R$ 19.89 R$ 10.46 R$ 9.43 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY - CONTROLLING (R$ per share) QUANTITIES OF BRF SHARES - Ex Treasury Shares 1,600,310,613 11

SUMMARY OF RESULTS FOUND (SHARE EXCHANGE RATIO) ¹ ¹The share exchange ratio takes into account the Companies’ Consolidated Shareholders' Equity at Market Value, excluding the portion of equity attributable to non - controlling shareholders, thus, reconciling the Parent Companies’ Shareholders' Equity with the necessary adjustments to reflect market values. The adjustments related to non - controlling shareholders were calculated according to the proportion of the assets attributable to this class of shareholders. Note: The share exchange ratio was based on each company’s shareholding structure at the time of issuance of this report, excluding the shares held in treasury by each company. 33,431,193,151 ( A ) BRF Shareholders' Equity (R$) 1,602,941,303 (B) Shareholders' Equity to the Market - Non - Controlling Interest BRF (R$) 31,828,251,849 ( C = A - B ) BRF Shareholders' Equity - Controlling Shareholders' Equity (R$) 1,600,310,613 ( D ) Number of BRF Shares - Ex Treasury Shares 19.88879633 (E=C/D) Value per Share (R$) MARKET VALUE OF MARFRIG'S SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 9,354,818,698 (F)MARFRIG's Stockholders' Equity (R$) 1,882,345,190 ( G ) Shareholders' Equity - Non - Controlling Interest MARFRIG (R$) 7,472,473,508 (H=F - G) MARFRIG's Shareholders' Equity - Controlling Shareholders' Equity (R$) 849,668,056 ( I ) Number of Marfrig Shares - Ex Treasury Shares 8.79457978 (J = H/I) Value per Share (R$) EXCHANGE RATIO 2.26148341591578 MARFRIG Share per BRF Share EXCHANGE RATIO - BRF AND MARFRIG SHARES MARKET VALUE OF BRF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 12

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................................... ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ........................ 13 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ................. 14 2. PRINCIPLES AND CAVEATS ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. 18 3. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. .. 19 4. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE COMPANIES.................................................................................................................... ... ............................................................................................................. 20 5. DESCRIPTION OF THE OPERATION ............................................................................................................................. ... ................................................................................................................ 23 6. INDUSTRY ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ........ 24 7. VALUATION METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................. ... ........................................................................................................................... 30 8. GENERAL CRITERIA FOR ASSET VALUATION ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................... 34 9. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ..................... 45 10. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ... 46 13

1. INTRODUCTION APSIS CONSULTORIA EMPRESARIAL LTDA . , hereinafter referred to as APSIS, headquartered at Rua do Passeio, No . 62 , 6 th floor, Centro, , City and State of Rio de Janeiro, registered with the CNPJ under No . 27 . 281 . 922 / 0001 - 70 , was appointed to determine the share exchange ratio of MARFRIG and BRF shares, based on the Adjusted Net Asset Method, according to the same criteria and on the same dates, of both companies, for the purposes of complying with article 264 of Law No . 6 , 404 (Brazilian Corporation Law) . EXPERIENCE IN THE VALUATION OF PUBLICLY HELD COMPANIES APSIS’ Business Valuation segment is composed of a specialized, certified team with recent experience in valuations of publicly traded companies in various industries . The following are the most relevant valuations carried out by APSIS in the last three years . ▪ Brasil Brokers (Nexpe Participações S.A.): appraisal report for compliance with articles 226 and 227 of the Brazilian Corporation Law, issued in February 2022. ▪ Terra Santa Propriedades Agrícolas S.A.: appraisal report for determining the share exchange ratio, issued in September 2022. ▪ Locaweb S.A.: appraisal report to comply with article 256 of the Brazilian Corporation Law, issued in March 2022. ▪ Arezzo Indústria e Comércio S.A.: appraisal report to comply with articles 226 and 227 of the Brazilian Corporation Law, issued in November 2022. ▪ Paranapanema S.A.: economic and financial feasibility study of the judicial reorganization plan, in compliance with item II of article 53 of Law No. 11,101/05 (Judicial Reorganization Law), issued in February 2023. ▪ Americanas S.A.: economic and financial feasibility study of the judicial reorganization plan, in compliance with item II of article 53 of Law No. 11,101/05 (Judicial Reorganization Law), issued in March 2023. ▪ Americanas S.A.: appraisal report of assets and properties to comply with the provisions of item III of article 53 of Law No. 11,101/05 (Judicial Reorganization Law), issued in March 2023. ▪ BR Properties S.A.: appraisal report to comply with CVM Resolution No. 85/22 (Tender Offer - OPA), issued in March 2023. ▪ Alpargatas S.A.: appraisal report to comply with CVM Resolution No. 85/22 (Tender Offer - OPA), issued in May 2023. ▪ Light S.A.: economic and financial feasibility study of the judicial reorganization plan, in compliance with item II of article 53 of Law No. 11,101/05 (Judicial Reorganization Law), issued in July 2023. ▪ BR Properties S.A.: appraisal report to comply with articles 226 and 227 of the Brazilian Corporation Law, issued in September 2023. ▪ GetNinjas S.A.: appraisal report to comply with CVM Resolution No. 85/22 (Tender Offer - OPA), issued in December 2023. ▪ Alper S.A.: appraisal report for compliance with CVM Resolution No. 85/22 (Tender Offer - OPA), issued in March 2024. ▪ Atacadão S.A.: appraisal report to comply with article 264 of the Brazilian Corporation Law, issued in March 2025. ▪ Atacadão S.A.: appraisal report to comply with article 252 of the Brazilian Corporation Law, issued in March 2025. 14

In the preparation of this work, data and information provided by third parties were used, in the form of documents and verbal interviews with the client. The estimates used in this process are based on: ▪ Simplified multi - year projections of MARFRIG and BRF. ▪ Consolidated financial statements of MARFRIG and BRF on the valuation date. ▪ Consolidated financial statements of MARFRIG net of BRF effects. ▪ Historical consolidated financial statements of MARFRIG and BRF. ▪ MARFRIG's financial statement consolidation plan. ▪ BRF and MARFRIG’s contingency fair value assessment and probability analysis; ▪ Documents showing MARFRIG’s and BRF’s revenue per customer. ▪ Employee roles and corresponding salaries, benefits, and labor charges, applicable to MARFRIG and BRF. ▪ Expenses and costs related to the expansion of BRF’s supplier integration area, as well as information on the total area integrated as of the valuation date . ▪ Other managerial information necessary for complementary analyses. The professionals who participated in the preparation of this work are listed below: ▪ BRUNO GRAVINA BOTTINO - Director ▪ CAIO CESAR CAPELARI FAVERO - Director / Administrator and Accountant (CRA 141231 and CRC 1SP342654) ▪ DANIEL FELIX LAMONICA - Projects ▪ LEONARDO HENRIQUE CARDOSO BRAZ – Projects ▪ MARCELO DA LUZ NASCIMENTO - Director / Civil Engineer (CREA/SP 260559523 - 4) ▪ MIGUEL CORTÊS CARNEIRO MONTEIRO – Director / Economist and Accountant (CORECON/RJ 26898 and CRC/RJ - 118.63/P - 0) ▪ PAMELLA RUIZ GUIMARÃES – Projects/ Civil Engineer (CREA/RJ 2022094204) ▪ PEDRO PONTES GOMES LOPES MARTINS – Projects/ Mechanical Engineer (CREA/RJ 2019832330) ▪ RODRIGO MENNA BARRETO AMIL - Projects Below we present a summary of the qualifications of the technical team directly responsible for the preparation of this Report. 15

BRUNO GRAVINA BOTTINO Graduated in Production Engineering from Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), he holds an extension course in Finance from Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV), an MBA in Business Management and an LLM in Business Law, both from IBMEC . He is as Project Director at APSIS, with a career focused on Business Valuation and Strategic Consulting, having provided services to several organizations from different market segments . He has extensive experience in economic and financial valuation processes for public and private entities, with participation in the preparation of appraisal reports for purposes such as marking of investment fund quotas, compliance with the Brazilian Corporation Law, Purchase Price Allocation (PPA), Impairment Testing (CPC 01 ), Tender Offers (OPA), Shareholder Settlement, M&A, among others . In Business Consulting, he has experience in managing projects focused on organizational efficiency through mapping, reviewing, controlling, and automating processes and areas, as well as other products such as defining SLAs, goals, performance evaluation models, budget analysis, business plans, and Post Merger Integration (PMI), combining business strategy and technology with a focus on organizational efficiency . CAIO CESAR CAPELARI FAVERO Graduated in Business Administration from FAAP – SP and in Accounting Sciences from FIPECAFI . He is as a Project Director at APSIS, with over 10 years of experience in business modeling and financial and accounting valuations, working on Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) projects, corporate restructuring (such as mergers, spin - offs and capital contributions), analysis of financial and operational strategies, valuation of intangible assets, Purchase Price Allocation (PPA), Tender Offers (OPA), judicial reorganization processes, judicial technical assistance, Fairness Opinions and regulatory valuations with the involvement of the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) . He focuses on several sectors, such as retail, consumer goods, hospitals, financial, insurance, natural resources, among others . RODRIGO MENNA BARRETO AMIL Graduated in Engineering from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), with a specialization in Finance from COPPEAD - UFRJ and an MBA from COPPEAD - UFRJ . He is a Project Manager at APSIS and has over 8 years of experience in economic - financial modeling, conducting valuations for purposes such as Marking of Investment Fund Quotas, Fairness Opinions, reports for corporate purposes, Purchase Price Allocation (PPA), Tender Offers (OPA), Judicial Reorganization, and other scopes . 16

DANIEL FELIX LAMONICA Graduated in Production Engineering from Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), with an extension course in Valuation and Asset Pricing, and professional experience in corporate financial operations and valuation of tangible and intangible assets . He is a Senior Consultant at APSIS, with experience in over 100 economic - financial valuation processes for various public and private entities . He has advised leading executives in a wide range of industries, including in processes such as Judicial Reorganization, Business Valuation, Purchase Price Allocation (PPA), Due Diligence, and valuation of intangible assets . LEONARDO HENRIQUE CARDOSO BRAZ Graduated with honors in Business Administration – International Business, with a concentration in Economics, from The George Washington University, in Washington, D . C . He has an extension course in Capital Markets from Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) . He is a Consultant at APSIS, with experience in over 100 economic and financial valuation processes of public and private entities . He works on projects related to Tender Offers (OPA), Business Valuation, Purchase Price Allocation (PPA), Judicial Reorganization, Impairment Tests, Marking of Investment Fund Quotas and valuation of intangible assets, such as trademarks, contracts, patents, customer portfolios and software, among others . 17

2. PRINCIPLES AND CAVEATS The Report, the object of the work enumerated, calculated and particularized, carefully obeys the fundamental principles described below, which are important and should be carefully read. ▪ The consultants have no interest, direct or indirect, in the companies involved or in the transaction, and there is no other relevant circumstance that could characterize a conflict of interest. ▪ APSIS's professional fees are in no way subject to the findings of this Report. ▪ To the best knowledge and to the credit of the consultants, the analyses, opinions, and conclusions expressed in this Report are based on true and correct data, diligence, research and surveys. ▪ The information received from third parties is assumed to be correct, and their sources are contained and cited in the Report. ▪ For projection purposes, it is assumed that there are no encumbrances of any nature, judicial or extrajudicial, affecting the companies in question, other than those listed in this Report, if applicable. ▪ The Report presents all the limiting conditions imposed by the methodologies adopted, if any, that may affect the analyses, opinions and conclusions contained therein. ▪ The Report was prepared by APSIS, and no one, except its own consultants, prepared the analyses and corresponding conclusions. ▪ APSIS assumes full responsibility for the matter of Valuations, including implicit ones, for the exercise of its honorable functions, primarily established in its own laws, codes or regulations. ▪ This Report meets the recommendations and criteria established by the Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT), the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and the International Valuation Standards (IVS). ▪ The controlling shareholder and the managers of the companies involved have not directed, limited, hindered or performed any acts that have or may have compromised the availability, use or knowledge of information, goods, documents or work methodologies relevant to the quality of the conclusions contained in this Report. ▪ The internal process of drafting and approving this document involved the following main steps: (I) analysis of the documentation provided by management; (II) analysis of the market in which the company operates and of comparable companies; (III) discussion and preparation of the financial projection, definition of the discount rate and conclusion of the valuation; (IV) submission of the report for independent internal review; (V) implementation of any improvements and suggested changes; (VI) issuance of a final report. 18

3. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY ▪ To prepare this Report, APSIS used and assumed as true and coherent information and historical data audited by third parties or not audited, provided in writing by the company's management or obtained from the aforementioned sources, and has no responsibility for their veracity. ▪ The scope of this valuation did not include an audit of the financial statements, or a review of the work carried out by its auditors. Accordingly, APSIS is not expressing an opinion on the Applicant's financial statements and measurements. ▪ APSIS is not responsible for occasional losses to the Requester and its subsidiaries, its partners, directors and creditors or other parties as a result of the use of the data and information provided by the company and contained in this Report. ▪ This Report was developed solely for the use of the Requester and its partners, aiming at the purpose already described; therefore, it should not be published, circulated, reproduced, disseminated or used for any purpose other than the aforementioned one without the prior written approval of APSIS. ▪ The analyses and conclusions contained herein are based on several assumptions made on the present date, regarding operational projections, such as prices, volumes, market shares, revenues, taxes, investments, margins, etc. Thus, the company's future results may be different from any forecast or estimate of this work, especially if there is later knowledge of information not available at the time of the issuance of the Report. ▪ This assessment does not reflect events and impacts that occurred after the date of issuance of the Report. ▪ APSIS is not responsible for direct or indirect losses of profits that may arise from the improper use of this Report. ▪ We emphasize that understanding the conclusion of this Report will occur through the full reading of it and its attachments, and therefore no conclusions should be drawn from partial reading, which may be incorrect or mistaken. 19

4. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE COMPANIES MARFRIG Marfrig Global Foods S . A . is a Brazilian multinational company that operates in the food sector, with a presence in foodservice, retail, convenience, industrial and export channels, both in Brazil and abroad . With production units distributed throughout the Americas, the Company has a broad and diversified portfolio, being present in the largest restaurant and supermarket chains in the world, in addition to reaching consumers in about 100 countries . Marfrig's activities include the production, processing, industrialization, sale and distribution of animal protein - based products — beef, pork, sheep, poultry and fish — as well as vegetable proteins . The Company is domiciled in Brazil, with headquarters in the city of São Paulo . Marfrig's history began in 1986 , when its founder, Marcos Antônio Molina dos Santos, opened his first business at the age of 16 , quickly consolidating himself as an important distributor of beef cuts and other proteins . In 1998 , it opened its first distribution center in the city of Santo André (SP), to meet the growing demand for food products . In 2000 , the founding partners formed Marfrig Frigoríficos e Comércio de Alimentos Ltda . , which has undergone several corporate and name changes : in 2007 it became Marfrig Frigoríficos e Comércio de Alimentos S . A .; in 2009 , Marfrig Alimentos S . A .; and, in 2014 , it was renamed Marfrig Global Foods S . A . Also in 2000 , the first slaughtering and processing plant was leased in the city of Bataguassu (MS), later acquired by the company . Marfrig was incorporated on March 26 , 2007 and was registered as a publicly held company with the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Comission (CVM) on June 18 th of the same year . On June 29 , 2007 , it carried out its initial public offering (IPO), being listed on the Novo Mercado segment of B 3 . Between 2008 and 2012 , the Company made important investments and acquisitions, becoming one of the most internationalized and diversified companies in the Brazilian protein sector . Of note are the acquisitions of Moy Park ( 2008 ), Seara ( 2009 ) and Keystone ( 2010 ) . Moy Park was later sold as part of the company's strategy to focus on its core business, beef protein . In 2018 , Marfrig acquired control of the U . S . - based National Beef, the fourth largest beef company in the United States, consolidating itself as one of the largest global companies in the sector in terms of capacity . Also, during this period, it sold the subsidiary Keystone Foods, specialized in chicken meat . In January 2019 , the Company acquired 91 . 89 % of QuickFood, the Argentine leader in the production of beef - derived foods and owner of the Paty brand, the country's leading hamburger market . In the same year, it acquired a BRF processed plant in Várzea Grande (MT), specializing in the production of hamburgers, meatballs and kibbehs, in addition to entering a strategic partnership with BRF to supply hamburgers, among other products . Also in 2019 , together with other members of National Beef, Marfrig participated in the acquisition of all the stakes in Iowa Premium, LLC, for an aggregate value of US $ 150 million . BRF Investment 20

According to MARFRIG's 2024 Reference Form, the Company, following a strategy of commercial complementarity, invested approximately R $ 6 . 9 billion throughout 2021 in the acquisition of shares of BRF S . A . , which granted it a 33 . 20 % equity interest in the company, making it BRF's largest individual shareholder . In January 2022 , MARFRIG obtained the approval of its Board of Directors to subscribe shares within the limit of its equity interest, equivalent to 33 . 20 % of BRF's new share offering . BRF issued 270 , 000 , 000 new shares, with a total value of R $ 5 . 4 billion, at a unit price of R $ 20 . 00 . MARFRIG invested R $ 1 . 8 billion, acquiring 90 , 198 , 777 new shares . After this operation and new acquisitions, MARFRIG's stake in BRF's capital stock increased to 33 . 27 % . In February 2022 , after investing around R $ 9 billion in BRF, MARFRIG appointed a slate of candidates to compose the company's new Board of Directors, which was elected by majority vote in March of that year . Following the approval of the new Board of Directors on April 1 , 2022 , MAFRIG assumed control of BRF S . A . In August 2022, Miguel Gularte was appointed to and assumed the position of CEO of BRF. In 2023, BRF informed the market of the conclusion of a follow - on public offering, through which 600,000,000 new common shares were subscribed and paid up, at a price of R$ 9.00 per share, totaling R$ 5.4 billion. Within the scope of this offering, MARFRIG invested approximately R$ 1.8 billion, aiming to maintain its shareholding. During this process of capital increase and revision of BRF's bylaws, most shareholders voted and approved the suppression of the "poison pill" clause, which previously limited MARFRIG from increasing its stake in the company. As a result, MARFRIG made a new investment of around R$3 billion, increasing its stake from 33.27% to 50.06%, as announced on December 28, 2023. Furthermore, according to the 2024 Reference Form, as of December 31, 2024, MARFRIG held 50.49% of BRF's share capital, consolidating its position as the company's controlling shareholder. On the same date, MARFRIG had 126 thousand employees, in addition to 3 industrial complexes, 1 processing unit, 3 distribution centers and 1 commercial office in Brazil. 21

BRF BRF is one of the world's largest producers of fresh and frozen animal protein, standing out for its extensive production capacity and a portfolio of more than 7 , 300 SKUs . Its products include marinated and frozen chicken, Chester® chicken, turkey meats, specialty meats, frozen processed meats, ready meals, fractionated items, as well as plant - based products . The company also sells margarine, butter, cottage cheese, special sweets, sandwiches, plant - based foods and animal feed . Owner of leading brands widely recognized by the public, such as Sadia, Perdigão and Qualy, BRF consolidated its position in the market from the merger between two traditional family businesses : Perdigão and Sadia . The union was announced in 2009 and completed in 2012 , marking the creation of one of the largest conglomerates in the food sector . Both companies already occupied prominent positions in the national and international market, with products exported to more than 120 countries . In the pet food segment, BRF has four manufacturing units, located in the states of São Paulo, Rio Grande do Sul, Paraná and also in Paraguay . Its portfolio includes brands such as Biofresh, Guabi Natural, Gran Plus, Balance, Three Dogs, Three Cats, PrimoCão, PrimoGato, Faro, Bônos, Apolo and Átila, serving different consumer profiles and their pets . BRF Operations With a 40.8% share of the Brazilian processed food market as of December 31, 2024, BRF maintains a solid structure consisting of 44 industrial units and 103 distribution centers. The company has a highly developed logistics system in the domestic market, supported by a vast distribution network that includes distribution centers and transit points. In 2024, this structure made it possible to serve approximately 415 thousand customers globally, with more than 500 thousand deliveries per month, according to MARFRIG's 2024 Reference Form. Complementing its operational efficiency, BRF invests in technology through a digital sales platform that suggests orders in a personalized way, based on the characteristics of each point of sale. Also, according to MAFRIG's Reference Form, the company demonstrated strong capillarity, with more than 300 thousand active customers in Brazil in June 2024. 22

5. DESCRIPTION OF THE OPERATION According to information provided by MARFRIG's management, the companies are evaluating a corporate reorganization involving the merger of BRF’s shares. The present study was prepared with the objective of providing legal and corporate support for the operation. To this end, the assets of both companies were appraised at market prices, in compliance with Article 264 of Law No. 6,404/76. The organizational chart below presents the organizational structure of MARFRIG and BRF before and after the corporate restructuring to be carried out. PRE - MERGER STRUCTURE POST - MERGER STRUCTURE * 50.49% 49.51% 100% * BRF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS Receive MARFRIG (MFRG3) shares through the proposed share exchange ratio BRF MARFRIG BRF MARFRIG BRF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS BRF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS 23

6. INDUSTRY ANALYSIS THE BRAZILIAN FOOD INDUSTRY Brazil is globally recognized for its leading role in agribusiness, standing out as a food producing power, both grains and animal products . The Brazilian food industry is the largest in the country, accounting for 10 . 8 % of the national GDP and generating 2 . 075 million formal and direct jobs . The revenue of the Brazilian food industry reached R $ 1 . 277 trillion in 2024 , an increase of 9 . 98 % compared to the previous year, according to data released by the Brazilian Association of the Food Industry (ABIA) . Of this total, 72 % (approximately R $ 918 billion) came from the domestic market, while 28 % (approximately US $ 66 . 3 billion) came from foreign trade . Since 2022 , Brazil has been the world leader in the export of industrialized foods in volume . In 2024 , the country exported 80 . 3 million tons, an increase of 10 . 4 % compared to 2023 , with total revenues reaching US $ 66 . 3 billion, 6 . 6 % higher than that recorded in the previous year (US $ 62 . 2 billion) . Brazilian food products reach more than 190 countries and territories, with the main markets being Asia ( 38 . 7 % of exports, with emphasis on China, which represents 14 . 9 % ), followed by the Arab League ( 18 . 9 % ) and the European Union ( 12 . 6 % ) . Brazil stands out as the world's largest exporter and 2 nd largest producer of beef, the world's largest exporter and 2 nd largest producer of poultry meat, in addition to being the 4 th largest producer and 3 rd largest exporter of pork . The items that lead the list of Brazilian exports are : ▪ Animal proteins (meat): US$ 26.2 billion; ▪ Sugar products: US$ 18.9 billion; ▪ Soybean products: US$ 10.7 billion; ▪ Oils and oils: US$ 2.3 billion; ▪ Juices and vegetable preparations: US$ 3.7 billion. MEAT INDUSTRY - WORLDWIDE PRODUCTION According to the “ Meat Market Review : Overview of Global Market Developments in 2024 ” report, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), world meat production grew by 1 . 7 % in 2024 , reaching 379 million tons (carcass equivalent) . Reduction in input costs, including lower feed and energy prices compared to previous years, has played a crucial role in sustaining this growth . The increase in production was mainly driven by poultry meat, followed by gains in beef production, while sheep meat production saw marginal growth and pork production remained stable . 24

1961 2010 2023 Regionally, there was an expansion in meat production in all the main producing areas, especially in Europe, Asia and South America . In Europe, the increases were mainly in pork and poultry, with smaller increases in beef . In Asia, the main growth factor was the expansion of poultry meat production . In South America, meat production increased, with emphasis on the growth of beef and poultry production in Brazil . Among the major producing regions, Asia leads the world meat production, followed by North America, Europe, and South America . Regarding countries, China leads the ranking with 97 . 5 million tons, followed by the United States, with 47 . 46 million tons, and Brazil, with 31 . 6 million tons in 2023 , according to the latest FAO survey . GLOBAL MEAT PRODUCTION (1961 - 2023) 400Million Tonnes 350Million Tonnes 300Million Tonnes 250Million Tonnes 200Million Tonnes 150Million Tonnes 100Million Tonnes 50Million Tonnes Million Tonnes 1970 1980 1990 2000 Asia Europe North America South America Africa Oceania Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) – 2025, with primary processing by Our World in Data 100Million Tonnes 80Million Tonnes 60Million Tonnes 40Million Tonnes 20Million Tonnes Million Tonnes 120Million Tonnes 1961 1990 India 1992 Russia 2000 United States 2010 2023 MEAT PRODUCTION (1961 - 2023) 1970 Brazil 1980 China Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) – 2025, with primary processing by Our World in Data 25

1961 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2022 MEAT INDUSTRY - WORLD TRADE According to the FAO report, global trade in meat and meat products increased by 4 . 7 % in 2024 , reaching 42 . 5 million tons (carcass equivalent), after two consecutive years of contraction . This recovery was underpinned by significant growth in meat production and improving global economic conditions, including reducing inflationary pressures and strengthening consumer purchasing power . These factors have contributed to the increase in meat imports, especially in developed economies facing constraints on domestic supply . The expansion was observed in all meat categories, with the trade of red meat, especially beef, registering the most significant increase . Strong import demand, especially from the United States, driven by limited growth in domestic production, and to a lesser extent from China, has contributed to the increase in world beef trade . In addition, pork and poultry trade also expanded, driven by reduced tariffs aimed at stabilizing domestic prices, as well as regional trade agreements that facilitated the elimination of trade restrictions related to animal diseases . These measures have expanded access to markets, stimulating cross - border trade in meat . The following graph shows the world per capita consumption of meat by type . PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION BY TYPE (1961 - 2022) 60 Kg 50 Kg 40 Kg 30 Kg 20 Kg 10 Kg Kg Poultry Pork Cattle and Buffalo Sheep and Goats Other Meats Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) – 2025, with primary processing by Our World in Data 26

YoY 25/24 2025* 2024* 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 Discrimination - 1,8% 214,690.0 217,836.3 224,602.1 234,352.6 233,390.8 229,957.6 225,903.4 Herd (1,000 head) - 4,3% 9,783.6 10,220.9 9,516.7 8,673.7 8,328.5 8,492.7 8,866.1 Beef production (1,000 t carcass equivalent) - 0,5% 61.1 62.5 61.5 80.6 70.7 62.7 49.7 Imports (1,000 t carcass equivalent) 2,5% 3,659.3 3,571.5 3,029.8 3,018.0 2,478.2 2,690.9 2,482.8 Exports (1,000 t carcass equivalent) - 7,8% 6,186.4 6,711.9 6,548.4 5,736.3 5,921.0 5,856.4 6,433.0 Domestic availability (1,000 t carcass equivalent) 0,5% 206.2 205.2 204.1 203.1 202.0 200.9 199.9 Population (millions of inhabitants) - 8,3% 30.0 32.7 32.1 28.2 29.3 29.2 32.2 Per capita availability (kg/inhabitant/year) Source: Conab/IBGE/Secex Note: *For 2024 and 2025 - Conab Estimates 27 BRAZIL BEEF Brazil plays a very important role in the international livestock sector, being the largest exporter, the third largest consumer and the second largest producer of beef in the world, with exports to more than 150 countries . According to the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (Mapa), beef sales reached USD 1 . 25 billion in September 2024 , representing an increase of 29 . 2 % compared to the same period in 2023 . According to the Secretariat of Trade and International Relations (SCRI/Mapa), this revenue was the third highest recorded in exports in the sector . In addition, exports of fresh beef generated a record volume shipped, with sales totaling US $ 1 . 14 billion, a growth of 28 . 5 % . According to data from the Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (National Supply Company, Conab), released in the report " Perspectivas para a Agropecuária – Safra 2024 / 25 , volume 12 ", beef production was 9 . 5 million tons in 2023 , an increase of 9 . 7 % compared to 2022 . For 2024 , expectations point to a record production of 10 . 2 million tons, a growth of 7 . 4 % compared to 2023 , reflecting the high moment of the livestock cycle at the end of 2024 . For 2025 , Conab estimates predict a production of 9 . 8 million tons, a reduction of 4 . 3 % compared to 2024 . This reversal in the livestock cycle occurs after intense culling of females . According to Conab, it is expected that, in 2025 , there will be a gradual increase in the retention of females, resulting in less availability of animals for slaughter in the medium and long term . This should generate stability or a moderate drop in slaughters and, consequently, in meat production . Beef Supply in Brazil (2019 – 2025)

YoY 25/24 2025* 2024* 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 Discrimination 3,1% 7,169.1 6,952.0 6,876.0 6,856.8 6,912.2 6,810.1 6,459.1 Placement of broiler chicks (million head) 2,1% 15,513.5 15,189.3 14,935.2 14,782.8 15,322.8 14,683.2 13,936.0 Chicken meat production (1,000 t) 5,5% 3.2 3.0 1.9 4.8 5.3 5.2 5.0 Imports (1,000 t) 1,9% 5,199.4 5,102.1 5,009.3 4,652.8 4,467.6 4,124.7 4,174.8 Exports (1,000 t) 2,3% 10,317.2 10,090.2 9,927.8 10,134.9 10,770.5 10,563.7 9,766.2 Domestic availability (1,000 t) 0,5% 206.2 205.2 204.1 203.1 202.0 200.9 199.9 Population (millions of inhabitants) 1,7% 50.0 49.2 48.6 49.9 53.3 52.6 48.9 Per capita availability (kg/inhabitant/year) Source: Conab Note: (*) projections 28 POULTRY MEAT (CHICKEN) In the poultry sector, the United States leads world production with 21 . 2 million tons . Brazil ranks as the second largest producer, with 15 . 2 million tons produced in 2024 , representing a growth of 1 . 7 % compared to 2023 . Brazilian production is expected to reach 15 . 5 million tons in 2025 , an increase of 2 . 1 % compared to 2024 , according to data from Conab . Regarding exports, Brazil remains the world’s largest exporter, with 36 % of global chicken meat exports, totaling 5 . 1 million tons in 2024 , a growth of 1 . 9 % compared to 2023 . For 2025 , expectations are that Brazil will repeat this growth, reaching 5 . 2 million tons, an increase of 1 . 9 % compared to the previous year . According to Conab, national economic indicators, such as GDP growth and reduced unemployment, contributed to a more heated domestic demand, allowing advances in live chicken prices . This scenario, combined with the good pace of exports and the conjuncture of controlled costs — due to the drop in grain prices — generated an optimistic outlook for the chicken meat market in 2025 . Overall, the chicken market remains robust, with prospects for continued growth in both production and global consumption . The trade dynamics reflect Brazil's importance as a key supplier, while China remains a major global consumer and importer . An isolated episode of Newcastle disease in Rio Grande do Sul, in July 2024 , demonstrated the effectiveness of biosafety in Brazilian production . Brazil adopted an automatic self - embargo and, in less than a week, the end of the outbreak of the disease was announced . According to FAO, most Brazilian chicken meat importers, including China, have resumed imports, adopting a regionalization approach, that is, restricting trade only to the affected region . Despite lower demand from China, Brazil's exports were boosted by increased purchases from the United Arab Emirates, Japan, the Philippines, Mexico and Iraq . Poultry Meat Supply in Brazil (2019 – 2025

YoY 25/24 2025* 2024* 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 Discrimination 1,2% 46,122.7 45,556.1 44,973.6 44,393.9 42,550.9 41,211.2 40,556.1 Herd (1,000 head) 1,6% 5,449.2 5,365.6 5,298.6 5,186.3 4,899.0 4,482.0 4,125.7 Pork meat production (1,000 t carcass equivalen 2,8% 20.1 19.6 17.1 22.6 29.5 15.9 19.2 Imports (1,000 t carcass equivalent) 3,0% 1,270.2 1,233.3 1,211.7 1,109.1 1,131.0 1,027.8 763.0 Exports (1,000 t carcass equivalent) 1,1% 4,199.1 4,151.9 4,104.0 4,099.9 3,797.5 3,470.1 3,381.9 Domestic availability (1,000 t) 0,5% 206.2 205.2 204.1 203.1 202.0 200.9 199.9 Population (millions of inhabitants) 0,6% 20.4 20.2 20.1 20.2 18.8 17.3 16.9 Per capita availability (kg/inhabitant/year) Source: Conab Note: *For 2024 and 2025 - Conab Estimates 29 PORK In the pork sector, Brazil is the 4 th largest producer in the world, with 5 . 37 million tons in 2024 , representing an increase of 1 . 3 % compared to 2023 . Brazilian production is expected to reach 5 . 4 million tons in 2025 , a growth of 1 . 6 % compared to 2024 , according to data from Conab . China leads global pork production, accounting for 49 % of world production and half of global consumption, according to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) . In the export segment, the United States leads, with 32 % of world exports, followed by the European Union and Brazil, which occupies the 3 rd position, with 14 % of global exports, totaling 1 . 23 million tons in 2024 , an increase of 1 . 8 % compared to 2023 . For 2025 , Brazilian exports are expected to reach 1 . 27 million tons, a growth of 3 . 0 % compared to 2024 , according to Conab . The Conab report indicates that, in 2024 , the global pork market was impacted by adjustments in production and marketing, with China reducing its imports . Other markets, such as Mexico, absorbed part of the volume previously destined for China . In 2023 , China accounted for 32 % of all Brazilian pork exports, but by 2024 , that percentage had dropped to less than 20 % . Although exports to China decreased significantly in 2024 , this drop was more than offset by increases in exports to the Philippines, which became the second largest destination for Brazilian pork, according to FAO data . In addition, exports to markets such as Japan, Chile, and Singapore also registered significant increases, reducing Brazil's dependence on the Chinese market and highlighting Brazil’s market diversification strategy . Pork Meat Supply in Brazil (2019 – 2025)

7. VALUATION METHODOLOGY 1. ASSET APPROACH: ADJUSTED NET ASSET METHOD This methodology is derived from the accounting practices adopted in Brazil, in which the financial statements are prepared based on the principle of historical cost or acquisition cost or adjusted to fair value when so required . Under these accounting practices, the carrying amount of a company's equity is equal to the carrying amount of assets minus the carrying amount of liabilities . The application of this methodology, which takes book values as a starting point, requires adjustments to the company's assets and liabilities to reflect their realizable values, that is, the values that could be obtained in a sale or liquidation of assets and obligations . The result of this application provides an initial basis for estimating the value of the company, as well as providing a useful reference for comparisons with other valuation methodologies . According to economic principles, the value of assets minus the value of liabilities should be equal to the value of the company's shareholders' equity . From the perspective of valuation, value definitions are determined by the purpose of the valuation in question . Thus, the asset approach focuses on valuing the company by adjusting the book values of its assets and liabilities to their fair market values . Relevant assets and liabilities are valued based on fair market value, and this valuation is compared to the book value (or net amount) of the company's assets . The adjustments made are added to the book equity, thus generating the company's market value through the asset approach . It is important to note that, under this method, no type of future profitability (such as goodwill) should be incorporated into the calculation of the shareholders’ equity at market value . In addition, the methodology used in this assessment assumes that the company is in continuous activity (going concern), which means that the company will continue its operations for the foreseeable future . Thus, expenses related to the liquidation of assets or liabilities, as well as costs related to bankruptcy or liquidation proceedings of the company, were not considered in the calculations of this valuation . 2. VALUATION APPROACHES Three types of approaches can be used to determine the value of an asset, whether tangible or intangible . They are : ▪ Market approach; ▪ Approach to income; and ▪ Cost approach. 30

MARKET APPROACH The fair value of the asset is estimated by comparing it to similar or comparable assets that have been sold or listed for sale in the primary or secondary market . In the case of intangible assets, sale or market prices are rarely available, as they are usually transferred only as part of a business, and not in a one - off transaction, which means that this approach is rarely used in the valuation of intangible assets . INCOME APPROACH It defines the value of the asset as the current value of the future benefits that result from its right of ownership . The fair value of the future cash flows that the asset will generate during its useful life is projected based on current expectations and assumptions about future conditions . It is worth noting, however, that synergistic or strategic effects other than those realized by market participants should not be included in the projected cash flows . ▪ MULTI - PERIOD EXCESS EARNINGS METHOD (MPEEM) The MPEEM measures the present value of future income to be generated during the remaining useful life of a given asset . Using the analysis of the company's projected results as a reference, the cash flows directly attributable to the asset, on a pre - tax basis, are calculated, starting from the base date stipulated in the valuation . As in the company's analysis, the cost of goods sold and other operating expenses are deducted from the projected revenue attributed to the asset, resulting at the operating net income . From there, the charges on the identified contributory assets, directly related to the asset in question (contributory asset charges), are removed . A detailed description of the MPEEM methodology can be found in the book Valuation For Financial Reporting : Fair Value Measurements and Reporting, Intangible Assets, Goodwill, and Impairment (MARD et al . , 2007 ) and also in the guidelines issued by The Appraisal Foundation in Best Practices For Valuations In Financial Reporting : Intangible Asset Working Group – Contributory Assets (AARON et al . , 2010 ) . The assumed fair value of a contributory asset is not necessarily static over time . Working capital and fixed assets can fluctuate over the forecast period, and returns are typically based on the estimated average balances of each year . While the book value of amortizable intangible assets declines over time, it is assumed that such assets are replenished annually . Therefore, the contributory charge typically takes the form of a fixed annual rate . An exception to this rule is a non - compete agreement . 31

BASES FOR CALCULATING THE REQUIRED RETURN ON CONTRIBUTORY ASSETS The following table presents the suggested bases for each group of contributory assets. 32 CHARGING BASIS ACTIVE Average post - tax funding rate applied to the company’s working capital financing. Working Capital Financing rates for similar assets applicable to market participants (e . g . , general financing terms offered by suppliers), or rates implied by operating leases, finance leases, or both, typically separated into a return on (investment return) and a return of (capital recovery) the asset . Fixed assets (e.g., real estate, plant, and equipment) Rates appropriate to the risk profile of the intangible asset being analyzed . When market evidence is available, it should be used . In other cases, the rates should be consistent with the relative risk of other assets included in the analysis, and higher for riskier assets . Other intangible assets, including basic technology ▪ ROYALTY RELIEF This methodology is considered the standard and preferred technique for the valuation of assets such as trademarks, core technology and patents . In the Relief from Royalty Method, we estimate the value of these types of intangible assets, by capitalizing on the royalties that are saved because the company owns the intangible asset . In other words, the owner of the brand, core technology, and patents realizes a benefit from owning the intangible asset, rather than paying rent or royalties for the use of the asset . ▪ COST APPROACH It measures the investment required to reproduce a similar asset, which has an identical capacity to generate benefits . And this approach is based on the principle of substitution, in which a prudent investor would not pay more for an asset than the cost to replace it with a comparable ready - made .

▪ REPRODUCTION COST NEW (RPCN) It is "the current cost of an identical new good" . In other words, it is the estimated cost to build, at current prices as of the valuation date, an exact copy, or replica of the asset under valuation, using the same materials, building standards, design, layout, and quality of workmanship, and incorporating all the asset - subject deficiencies, overcapacity, and obsolescence . ▪ REPLACEMENT COST NEW (RPLCN) It is "the current cost of a similar new asset having the nearest equivalent utility to the asset being valued" . There are two alternative methods for calculating the DRCN . The first method (Reproduction Method) begins with the RPDCN, with adjustments made for physical depreciation and functional and technological obsolescence . The second method (Replacement Method) starts with the RPLCN, with adjustments made for physical depreciation and for additional functional and technological obsolescence . Certain elements of functional and technological obsolescence are already addressed in the calculation of the RPLCN . However, the quantification of overcapacity and the additional functionalities of the replacement asset in contrast to the asset to be assessed should be addressed . If economic obsolescence is indicated, it must be quantified, and the appropriate adjustment must be made, so that the DRCN is equivalent to fair value . 33

8. GENERAL CRITERIA FOR ASSET VALUATION This Report was prepared with the purpose of complying with the legislation in force in the context of the corporate reorganization involving BRF and MARFRIG . The audited financial statements taken as a basis were prepared by the companies, and the following pages present the general criteria defined for the market valuation of each account and/or group of accounts of the two companies involved in the operation . Thus, considerations about the valuations carried out follow . BRF BRF's appraised assets with fair value adjustments to be identified at market value refer to its customer portfolio of one of the company's business lines, its Brands held, its portfolio of integrated suppliers and the fixed assets in general held by the company on the valuation date . In addition, fair value adjustments related to contingent liabilities held by BRF were recognized, referring to contingencies classified as possible and remote . In addition, the goodwill and non - compete agreement recorded in BRF's Balance Sheet, referring to past acquisitions, were written off due to the orderly settlement of the Adjusted Net Asset methodology . The BRF assets with identified fair value adjustments are the following, with their respective valuation approaches : MARFRIG The assets appraised for MARFRIG with fair value adjustments to be identified at market value refer to its customer portfolio from the South America (LATAM) operations, its proprietary brands, relationships with suppliers, assets held for sale, and fixed assets in general held by the company as of the valuation date . Additionally, fair value adjustments related to contingent liabilities held by MARFRIG and not previously recognized, classified as possible and remote contingencies, were accounted for . Furthermore, goodwill and sales channels recorded in MARFRIG’s balance sheet, stemming from past acquisitions, were written off in light of the orderly liquidation approach adopted under the Adjusted Net Asset methodology . ASSETS/ LIABILITIES BRF METHODOLOGY Customer Relatioship - Business Unit Tradename Integrated Supplier Relationship Inventory - Finished Products Contingencies - Possible and Remote Fixed Assets MPEEM (Excess Earnings) Relief from Royalties Replacement Cost Approach Market Approach According to the risk assessment of BRF's legal advisors Market Approach 34

BRF INTANGIBLE ASSETS ▪ CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP The customer portfolio intangible asset derives from the company's relationship with its clientele. This relationship has value for a business, as it represents a stable and recurring source of income. BRF has its sales highly diluted among a high number of customers. BRF's main customers are large retail chains in Brazil, especially the main supermarket chains. In management analyses of MARFRIG's customers and revenues, loyalty can be perceived, which translates into constant revenues from the products sold. To calculate the value of this intangible asset, the Multi - Period Excess Earnings Method (MPEEM) was used, with the identification of the contributory assets and the appropriate rates of economic remuneration of these assets. The MPEEM aims to isolate the cash flow attributable to a specific asset from the total cash flow. In this method, debits are made against the total net income, by the use of contributing assets, and the excess profit is allocated to the intangible under valuation. To calculate the customer portfolio, the company's cash flow projection estimated by management was used as a basis. The churn rate of BRF's total portfolio was estimated according to calculations based on the company's total revenue history . However, after the economic and financial modeling of the total customer portfolio, it was observed that the company's contributory assets have a contribution margin higher than the company's own total (consolidated) margin, with the main contributory assets being fixed assets and brands . Based on this, it was observed that BRF's total customer portfolio does not have a market value to be identified in the context of this report . MARFRIG’s appraised assets are as follows, with their respective valuation approaches: ASSETS / LIABILITIES MARFRIG METODOLOGIA Fixed Assets Inventory Tradenames Customer Relationship/Contract Asset Held For Sale Contingencies BRF Supplier Relationship - National Beef Market Approach Market Approach Relief from Royalty MPEEM (Excess Earnings) Financial Statements Accordin to the risk as assessment of BRF's legal advisors Shareholders’ Equity at Market Value With or Without model 35

o CLIENT PORTFOLIO – BUSINESS VERTICAL Under the same methodology and intangible rationale described above, the customer portfolio of one of BRF’s business lines was separately evaluated, and its fair value was identified in the context of this report . Therefore,the MPEEM methodology was applied considering revenues and operating margins only from this operation, with the identification of the contributory assets and the appropriate rates of return of these assets . Further details of the valuation are presented in Attachment 1 . ▪ BRANDS Trademarks, logos, and the like have value to a business, in part because they allow consumers to easily identify a business with its products and services . The characteristics of the brand, as perceived by the consumer, can generate a consistent demand for the company's products or services . Branding can therefore enable revenue growth through increased units sold or charging higher prices than those charged by similar companies that do not have the benefit of that particular brand . BRF has, on the valuation date extremely relevant product brands, which are "top of mind" brand references in the food sector as a whole . The brands were appraised in a segregated manner in this report for demonstration purposes only, considering the main brands held by the company . To this end, a proportion of the company's net revenue per brand was used, observing the historical proportion performed by each brand . The brands appraised were the following : Sadia and Miss Daisy ; Perdigão, Na Brasa e Ouro ; margarine brands : Qualy, Claybom and Deline ; Banvit (BRF brand present in Turkey) ; and other less relevant brands (not " top of mind ") . Attachment 1 of this report details the main brands evaluated, the methodology used, and values found . The recognition of the fair value of the brands in the balance sheet to market was done in a consolidated manner, adding to the value of the brands . ▪ INTEGRATED SUPPLIER PORTFOLIO BRF has a network of more than 10 thousand suppliers integrated into the company's operating plants . The main function of these partners is the breeding and handling of the animal, where the integrated partner cedes the property and is remunerated for the service and investment applied . Regarding the supplies of animals for breeding, feed, medicines, transportation and veterinary monitoring are all the responsibility of BRF . The relationship between the parties takes place through a contract for the provision of services and remuneration for the use of the land, which is held by the integrated supplier (lease) . The entire production process in the integrated supply chain is monitored to ensure quality standards, food safety and compliance with current legislation . Traceability is a key point : BRF is able to follow the entire cycle, from the producer to the final product, facilitating quality control . Integrated producers, in turn, have access to financed inputs, technical support and purchase guarantees, which brings greater economic security and stimulus for the professionalization of rural properties . 36

According to the information provided by the company’s management regarding the sector, this type of relationship is vital in the chicken and pork chain for any player operating in the market . Thus, the intangible asset was appraised through the replacement cost/reconstruction methodology, regarding the total integrated area, considering all expenses and investments necessary for reconstruction from the valuation date of this relationship . To this end, BRF has provided updated management information regarding the necessary expenses foreseen for the expansion of the supplier area . The main expenses for the expansion of the integrated area were estimated, such as expenses with direct and indirect personnel, third - party services to be contracted, materials and utilities . Taking into account the total expenses specifically allocated to the expansion of the relationship area with the integrated partner (disregarding expenses for the maintenance of the area already owned) and the expanded area that generated such capex, the total area on the valuation date was estimated, in square meters, of suppliers integrated into BRF's plants . The following table summarizes the assumptions adopted and the fair value of the portfolio of suppliers held by BRF : ▪ GOODWILL AND NON - COMPETE AGREEMENT - PREVIOUS ACQUISITIONS The goodwill and non - compete agreement arising from previous acquisitions made by BRF, which, according to the company, do not have, or are not subject to, tax deductibility as of the valuation date, were written off from the market - value balance sheet under the orderly liquidation approach of the Adjusted Net Asset Value methodology. Total Cost Average Reconstruction Cost Total Integration Area Integrated Supplier Relationship BRL ' 000 R$/m² m² 1,411,973 48.6 29,024,398 Integrated Development 48.6 1,411,973 TOTAL 29,024,398 Intangible Fair Value (BRL ‘000) 1,411,973 37

BRF TANGIBLE ASSETS ▪ ASSET The company's main physical assets consist of machinery and equipment, buildings and facilities, as well as owned land owned by BRF. The valuation criteria adopted to determine the market value of this group of BRF's assets, and the results obtained can be viewed in Attachment 2. ▪ STOCK According to the company's Financial Statement as of December 31, 2024, BRF has a relevant finished product inventory balance (ready for sale/distribution). In this sense, from the perspective of an orderly liquidation of assets, it is necessary to determine the fair value of this inventory considering the sale flow. The first step in valuing inventory is the application of the gross sales margin on the value of finished products on the base date. Next, the cost of disposing of the product and a theoretical profit that would be charged for the disposing service provided by third parties are considered. Finally, the cost of storage is reduced to reach the market value of the inventory. According to the financial statement received, there was an inventory of finished products in the amount of R$ 3,524,872 thousand. The cost of disposal, the profit over disposal effort and the cost of storage were estimated based on the company's historical results. For the other components of the company's inventory on the base date, no additional adjustments were considered, given that they are stocks of raw materials intended for use in the production/handling of animals and other warehouse/spare materials. The premises and details of the evaluation can be found in Attachment 1 of this report. BRF LIABILITIES ▪ CONTINGENCIES BRF reports liabilities related to provisions for risks arising from legal proceedings classified as having a probable likelihood of loss, supported by legal opinions, in accordance with Technical Pronouncement CPC 25 – Provisions, Contingent Liabilities, and Contingent Assets (CPC 25 ) . As of the valuation date, the probable contingencies, mostly of a tax nature, in addition to civil and labor - related matters, can be reviewed in greater detail in the company’s public disclosures . Based on CPC 25 , present obligations, resulting from past events, in which the outflow of funds are not likely to settle the obligations constitute contingent liabilities . Although they are not recognized in accounting, the fair values of contingent liabilities, referring to materialized contingencies with possible and remote probability of loss, should negatively impact the fair value measurement of shareholders' equity to market, considering that another company, with the same characteristics, but which does not appear as a defendant in lawsuits, tends to have a higher net worth in the market . 38

Additionally, from the perspective of M&A transactions, it is common for the buyer of a business to insert protective clauses in a Share Purchase Agreement in order to shield the buyer from any liabilities not accounted for in the acquired company's balance sheet . This is due to the fact that these liabilities, even if they are possible or remote from loss and that are not included in the balance sheet, affect the value of a business . The measurement of the fair values of contingent liabilities, both possible and remote, of loss was based on opinions of the company's legal advisors of the materialized causes, which considered the current status of the ongoing lawsuits and the percentages of probability of loss of each of the relevant causes, being lower than the face values of the causes . These amounts, although they are not part of BRF's accounting liabilities because they do not comply with the provisions of CPC 25 with regard to accounting recognition, should, in the appraiser's understanding, compose a market adjustment that impacts the fair price per share of the Company, through the Adjusted Net Asset methodology . That said, the fair values of the lawsuits related to BRF, not only in cases with probability of probable loss (already accounted for on December 31 , 2024 ), but also in cases with possible and remote probability, as well as the probabilities of execution of these contingencies, were sent by BRF's management and incorporated in this report . For the purposes of this evaluation, we consider an increase in the contingencies considered relevant by BRF, classified by BRF's management as likely to be a possible or remote loss, which the company may assume, and the consolidated result of this evaluation made by the company is observed in the following table . CONTINGENCIES BRF (BRL '000) EVALUATED Capital gain from total contingencies Face value Equivalent probability Capital Gain 28,189,789 23.9% 6,737,736 Total Capital Gain (BRL '000) 6,737,736 39

▪ DEFERRED TAXES As for the fair value adjustments of the total assets net of the fair value adjustments of the total liabilities, it is necessary to constitute a liability related to the Income Tax and the Social Contribution on the capital gain, according to the Lucro Real tax regime, established by Law No . 9 , 249 / 95 (art . 15 , † 4 , and art . 20 ), since the BRF corporation is headquartered in Brazil . Thus, a rate of 34 % was applied to the net fair value adjustments, resulting from the market adjustment between assets and liabilities . ASSETS AND LIABILITIES ANALYZED WITHOUT ADJUSTMENT TO ASSIGNED MARKET – BRF ▪ BIOLOGICAL ASSETS BRF has an estimated stock at the base date of approximately 177 . 9 million birds and 4 . 9 million pigs in the control, and 201 . 2 million birds and 4 . 9 million pigs . In addition, the company maintains forests as collateral for financing and tax and civil contingencies, valued at R $ 70 million . Regarding such biological assets, chapter 8 . 1 of the company's Financial Statement as of December 31 , 2024 , provides the main information and assumptions considered for accounting recognition at fair value of these assets on the base date, according to accounting policy . The following is a translated excerpt from the aforementioned document : "The Company classifies live animals and forests as biological assets. These assets are valued at their fair value, and the technique of cost approach to live animals and revenue approach to forests is applied. The Company annually conducts the fair value assessment study, using the discounted cash flow method, and the gain or loss arising from the change in the fair value of the biological asset is recognized in the income statement of the year in which it originates. In the calculation of the fair value of live animals, all losses inherent to the breeding process are already taken into account." Therefore, such assets already had their market value updated on the valuation date and are not subject to appraisal in this report . ▪ OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES For the other assets and liabilities, after analysis and discussion with the company's management, no application or need for market adjustment was identified, and their book balances were considered as the best estimate of their respective market values . 40

MARFRIG'S INTANGIBLE ASSETS ▪ CUSTOMER PORTFOLIO The intangible customer portfolio derives from the company's relationship with its clientele . This relationship has value for a business, as it represents a stable and recurring source of income . MARFRIG has its sales segmented by regions : North America and South America . MARFRIG's main customers are large retail chains, especially the main supermarket chains . To calculate the intangible value, the Multi - Period Excess Earnings Method (MPEEM) was used, with the identification of the contributory assets and the appropriate rates of return of these assets . The MPEEM aims to isolate the cash flow attributable to a specific asset from the total cash flow . In this method, debits are made against the total net income, by the use of contributory assets, and the excess profit is allocated to the intangible under evaluation . To calculate the customer portfolio, the company's cash flow projection estimated by management was used as a basis . The churn rate of MARFRIG's total portfolio was estimated according to calculations based on the company's total revenue history . However, after the economic and financial modeling of the customer portfolio, the customer portfolios of the North America and South America operations were segregated . Thus, it was observed that the contributory assets of North America have a contribution margin higher than the total margin of the company's operation in the same region, with the main contributory assets being fixed assets on the market and the marks of North America . In the rte . Based on this ; it was observed that MARFRIG's client portfolio in North America does not have a market value to be identified in the context of this report . On the other hand, under the same methodology and rationale of intangible described above, the customer portfolio of América do Sull was evaluated separately, and its fair value was identified in the context of this report . Thus, the MPEEM methodology was applied considering the revenues and operating margins of this operation only, with the identification of the contributing assets and the appropriate rates of economic remuneration of these assets . Further details of the evaluation are presented in Attachment 3 . ▪ BRANDS Trademarks, logos, and the like have value to a business, in part because they allow consumers to easily identify a business with its products and services . The characteristics of the brand, as perceived by the consumer public, can generate a consistent demand for the company's products or services . Branding can therefore enable revenue growth through increased units sold or charging higher prices than those charged by similar companies that do not have the benefit of that particular brand . MARFRIG has, on the valuation date, brands of products that are extremely relevant in the food sector as a whole . The brands were evaluated segregated between the brands operating in South America and North America, considering the main brands owned by the company . 41

Attachment 3 of this report details the main brands valuated, the methodology used and values found . The recognition of the fair value of the brands in the balance sheet to market was done in a consolidated manner, adding the value of the brands . ▪ SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS The relationship with suppliers is the intangible asset related to contracts for the supply of cattle for slaughter and deboning . In this sense, in possession of this contract, MARFRIG, in its operation in North America, enjoys favorable conditions in relation to the market in which it operates . Thus, to evaluate the relationship with suppliers, we use the With - and - Without method, which is based on the income approach to estimate the value of this intangible . This methodology consists of determining the difference in the cash flows generated by the asset, taking into account the effects of the existence and absence of the contract . Attachment 3 of this report details the two projected flows, with and without the contract, the methodology used and values found . ▪ GOODWILL AND SALES CHANNELS Goodwill and sales channels from previous acquisitions made by MARFRIG, which, according to the company, do not have or are not subject to tax deductibility in force on the valuation date, were written off the balance sheet due to the orderly settlement of the Adjusted Net Asset methodology . MARFRIG'S TANGIBLE ASSETS ▪ FIXED ASSETS The company's main physical assets consist of machinery and equipment, works in progress, buildings and facilities, as well as owned land owned by MARFRIG. The valuation criteria adopted to determine the market value of this group of MARFRIG's assets and the results obtained can be viewed in Attachment 4. ▪ INVENTORY According to the company's financial statement as of December 31 st , 2024, MARFRIG has a relevant finished product inventory balance (ready for sale/distribution). In this sense, from the perspective of an orderly liquidation of assets, it is necessary to determine the fair value of this inventory considering the sale flow. The first step in valuing inventory is the application of the gross sales margin on the value of finished products on the valuation date. Next, the cost of disposing of the product and a theoretical profit that would be charged for the disposing service provided by third parties are considered. Finally, the cost of storage is reduced to reach the market value of the inventory. According to the financial statement received, there was a stock of finished goods worth R$ 3.337.479 thousand. The cost of disposal, the profit over disposal effort and the cost of storage were estimated based on the company's historical results. 42

In addition, as informed by the company, considering that the product sold by MARFRIG has very short turnover days and due to the characteristic of a perishable product (beef), a 100 % use of the raw material was considered in the valuation . For the other components of the company's inventory on the base date, no additional adjustments were considered, given that they are stocks of raw materials intended for use in the production/handling of animals and other warehouse/spare materials . The premises and details of the evaluation can be found in Attachment 3 of this report . MARFRIG'S LIABILITIES ▪ CONTINGENCIES MARFRIG presents liabilities on provision for risks related to lawsuits classified as likely to be lost and supported by lawyers' opinions, in accordance with CPC 25 – Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets . On the base date, the probable contingencies can be seen in more detail in the company's public information, but they are mostly tax (in addition to civil and labor) . Based on CPC 25 , present obligations, resulting from past events, in which the outflow of funds are not likely to settle the obligations constitute contingent liabilities . Although they are not recognized in accounting, the fair values of contingent liabilities, referring to materialized contingencies with possible and remote probability of loss, should negatively impact the fair value measurement of shareholders' equity to market, considering that another company, with the same characteristics, but which does not appear as a defendant in lawsuits, tends to have a higher net worth in the market . Additionally, from the perspective of M&A transactions, it is common for the buyer to include protective clauses in a SPA, in order to protect itself against any liabilities not accounted for in the acquired company's balance sheet. This is because while these liabilities are classified as possible or remote from loss and do not appear on the balance sheet, they directly impact the value of the business. The measurement of the fair values of contingent liabilities, both possible and remote of loss, was based on opinions of the company's legal advisors, who considered the current status of the ongoing lawsuits and the percentages of probability of loss of each of the relevant causes, which are lower than the values attributed to the causes. Although these liabilities are not part of MARFRIG's accounting liabilities, as they do not meet the criteria established by CPC 25 for accounting recognition, the appraiser understands that they should be considered as market adjustments, impacting the company's fair price per share, through the Shareholders' Equity to Market methodology. That said, the fair values of the lawsuits related to MARFRIG, not only in cases with probable probability of loss (already accounted for on December 31 st , 2024 ), but also in the cases with possible and remote probability, as well as the probabilities of execution of these contingencies, were provided by MARFRIG's management and incorporated into this report . For the purposes of this assessment, we consider an increase in the contingencies considered relevant by MARFRIG, classified by management as a probability of possible or remote loss, which the company may assume . The result of this evaluation carried out by the company can be seen in the following table . 43

▪ DEFERRED TAXES Regarding the fair value adjustments of total assets net of the fair value adjustments of total liabilities, an Income Tax and Social Contribution liability on the capital gain must be constituted under the Lucro Real tax regime, as established by Law No . 9 , 249 / 95 (art . 15 , † 4 , and art . 20 ), considering that the parent company MARFRIG is headquartered in Brazil . Thus, a rate of 34 % of Income Tax and Social Contribution on the net fair value adjustments resulting from the difference between market - adjusted assets and liabilities was considered . ▪ OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES For the other assets and liabilities, after analysis and discussion with the company's management, no application or need for market adjustment was identified, and their book balances were considered as the best estimate of their respective market values . 44 APPRAISED MARFRIG CONTINGENCIES (BRL '000) 11,638,168 Capital gain of total contigencies Face value 12.3% Equivalent Probability 1,432,674 Capital gain 1,432,674 Total capital gain (BRL '000)

9. CONCLUSION In light of the examinations carried out in the aforementioned documentation and based on studies by APSIS, the experts concluded that the exchange ratio of MARFRIG shares for BRF shares, valuated according to the discounted cash flow methodology, as of December 31 st , 2024, is: The present consulting work did not take into account the assessment of the ESG (environmental, social and governance) potential of the analyzed assets. The negative and positive impacts of ESG on companies can be appraised in an independent report, to be contracted exclusively for this purpose, through the application of its own methodology. The Appraisal Report AP - 0047 5 /25 - 01 was prepared by APSIS (CREA/RJ 1982200620 and CORECON/RJ RF.02052), a company specialized in asset appraisal, legally represented below by its consultants, who are available for any clarifications that may be necessary. Rio de Janeiro, May 15 th , 2025. MIGUEL CORTÊS CARNEIRO MONTEIRO Director MARCELO DA LUZ NASCIMENTO Director 33,431,193,151 (A) BRF Shareholders' Equity (R$) 1,602,941,303 (B) BRF Shareholders' Equity at Market Value - Non - Controlling Interest (R$) 31,828,251,849 (C=A - B) BRF Shareholders' Equity - Controlling Interest (R$) 1,600,310,613 (D) Number of BRF Shares - Ex Treasury Shares 19.88879633 (E=C/D) Value per Share (R$) MARKET VALUE OF MARFRIG'S SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 9,354,818,698 (F) MARFRIG Shareholders' Equity (R$) 1,882,345,190 (G) MARFRIG Shareholders' Equity - Non - Controlling Interest (R$) 7,472,473,508 (H=F - G) MARFRIG's Shareholders' Equity - - Controlling Interest (R$) 849,668,056 ( I ) Number of Marfrig Shares - Ex Treasury Shares 8.79457978 (J = H/I) Value per Share (R$) EXCHANGE RATIO 2.26148341591578 MARFRIG Share per BRF Share EXCHANGE RATIO - BRF AND MARFRIG SHARES MARKET VALUE OF BRF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 45

10. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS 1. Market value of tangible and intangible assets and liabilities – BRF 2. Market valuation of fixed assets – BRF 3. Market value of tangible and intangible assets and liabilities – MARFRIG 4. Market valuation of fixed assets – MARFRIG 5. Glossary 46

ATTACHMENT 1

CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - VERTICAL BUSINESS UNIT DESCRIPTION The intangible customer relationship derives from the relationship with customers of one of BRF's business units . As such, this asset was valued separately . ▪ VALUATION METHODOLOGY We used the income approach and, specifically, the MPEEM to value the customer relationship . This method is based on the concept that the fair value of an intangible asset is equal to the present value of the cash flows attributable to that asset . For the cash flows to be realized, they must be net of the contribution of other assets, whether tangible or intangible . Using the analysis of the projected results of the company as a whole, the pre - tax cash flows associated with the customer relationship are calculated, considering the base date of the valuation . As with the company's cash flow, the cost of goods sold and other operating expenses are deducted from the projected revenue relating to the intangible, determining the net operating profit . The charges directly related to the customer relationship in question (Contributory Asset Charges or CAC) are then deducted from the identified contributory assets . After determining the value attributable to the customer relationship, it is necessary to consider the tax impact of amortizing the goodwill relating to this intangible . Amortization is an economic benefit for the acquirer that reduces its effective expenditure on the acquisition ; it must therefore be considered when determining the value . The present value of the tax amortization benefit of the customer relationship was calculated in accordance with current tax guidelines, which require compliance with the useful life of the asset. ▪ VALUATION CRITERIA The following steps were applied in the valuation of the fair value of the customer relationship, using the MPEEM: o Determining revenue - Revenue takes into consideration the existing customer relationship on the valuation date. Its evolution was projected according to the forecast inflation rate. New customers were not taken into account in the calculation. o Churn rate − To determine the churn rate, the historical loss of customers was calculated based on the turnover attributable to each of them over the last three years. The churn rate was applied to the revenue of the customer relationship, representing the loss of customers on an annual basis. o Cost and expenses − The costs and expenses considered were based on the company's cash flow and multiplied by the percentage of customers remaining each year. o Trademark CAC − The pre - tax charge for the brand was based on the royalty rate considered for the business unit and applied to projected net revenue year on year. o Income tax deduction - The tax rate of 34% was used, based on the Brazilian tax rate on the valuation date. 1

o Other CACs − In order to isolate the cash flows attributable solely to the customer relationship, we deducted the charges from contributory assets, determining the economic return on the assets that contribute to these flows . The post - tax contributory assets used are presented below . o CAC fixed assets (return on and return of) - The CAC on fixed assets represents a return on fixed assets based on their fair value on the valuation date . For the given business unit, an annual CAC after tax of 5 . 5 per cent was used and applied to projected net revenue year on year . The depreciation of these assets was also taken into account, since their maintenance charges must be added to the calculation . o Working capital CAC - Working capital is needed to support business operations . An annual CAC after tax of 5 . 5 per cent was applied, based on the company's financing rate . o Workforce CAC - The workforce is considered an element of goodwill, and not a separately identified intangible asset. However, it is understood as an asset that contributes to the company's cash flow generation; therefore, it is necessary to apply a CAC to the client relationship. For this, a rate of return equal to the company's discount rate was contemplated. o Integrated Supplier Relationship CAC − The integrated suppliers relationship was understood as an asset that contributes to generating the company's cash flow; therefore, it is necessary to apply a CAC to the customer relationship. For this, a rate of return equal to the company's discount rate was contemplated. o Discount rate application − The after - tax cash flows, after the adjustments described above, were brought to present value at the appropriate rate of return, given the nature of the asset. We determined a discount rate equal to the WACC calculated by APSIS for BRF. o Useful life definition − o The 7 - year useful life of the customer relationship was calculated based on an analysis of the historical churn rate presented by the customer base. o Tax amortization benefit (TAB) − We made the calculation in accordance with current tax guidelines, which require tax amortization according to the useful life of the asset. The result was added to the fair value of the customer relationship. 2

▪ DISCOUNT RATE – BRF BRF's discount rate was calculated using the WACC methodology, in which the cost of capital is determined by the weighted average of the market value of the components of the capital structure (own and third party), as shown in the table below. CAPITAL STRUCTURE 78% EQUITY 22% DEBT 100% EQUITY + DEBT 2.0% PROJECTED U.S. INFLATION 3.8% PROJECTED BR INFLATION COST OF EQUITY 3.3% RISK - FREE RATE (Rf) 0.60 BETA u 0.71 BETA r 6.2% RISK PREMIUM (Rm - Rf) 0.7% SIZE PREMIUM (Sp) 2.6% WEIGHTED COUNTRY RISK 11.0% Nominal Ke in US$ ( = ) 12.9% Nominal Ke in R$ ( = ) WACC 12.9% COST OF EQUITY 5.5% COST OF DEBT 11.3% NOMINAL DISCOUNT RATE ( = ) COST OF DEBT NOMINAL Kd IN R$ ( = ) 8.1% Nominal Kd With Tax Shield ( = ) 5.5% 3

The main assumptions used to define the discount rate are listed below. o Capital structure − It was based on the arithmetic mean of the comparable companies in the meat sector selected for the Beta sample. o o Risk - free rate (cost of equity) − Corresponds to the average yield of the 20 - year US T - Bond (Federal Reserve) between 01/01/2020 and 31/12/2024. Source: http://www.treas.gov/offices/domestic - finance/debt - management/interest - rate/yield_historical.shtml. o Beta u − Equivalent to the average weekly historical beta over a five - year period for the meat sector, in which BRF's segment is included. The sample of comparables was researched in the S&P Capital IQ database. o Beta r − Beta re - levered by the company's capital structure . o Risk premium − Corresponds to the spread between SP500 and US T - Bond 20 years. Source: Supply Side. o Size premium − Source: Duff and Phelps | Ibbotson 2024. o Weighted Country Risk - Corresponds to the average country risk, weighted according to each country's revenue share. Source: Damodaran and EMBI+. o Cost of debt − It is determined by BRF's weighted average cost of funding on the base date. o Tax shield − Weighted average projected rate for the company. Based on our calculations, it was estimated at 31.8 per cent. o US long - term inflation rate − Source: https:// www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomccalendars.htm. o BR long - term inflation rate − Fonte: https://www3.bcb.gov.br/expectativas2/#/consultas. ▪ CONCLUSION Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 1B, we concluded a fair value of R$ 364,155 thousand and a useful life of 7 years for the business unit's customer relationship. 4

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2035 2034 2033 2032 2031 2030 2029 2028 2027 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT 2025 2026 BRL '000 86,190,073 83,064,521 80,052,312 77,149,337 74,351,634 71,655,385 69,056,912 66,552,668 64,139,237 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 59,571,759 61,813,325 686,080 661,200 637,223 614,115 591,845 570,383 549,699 529,765 510,553 492,039 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 10.1% 12.4% 15.3% 18.8% 23.2% 28.6% 35.2% 43.4% 53.5% 65.9% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 11.2% 13.9% 17.1% 21.0% 25.9% 31.9% 39.3% 48.4% 59.7% 73.5% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 77,174 91,627 108,788 129,162 153,352 182,072 216,172 256,657 304,725 361,795 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (38,503) (45,713) (54,275) (64,440) (76,508) (90,837) (107,849) (128,048) (152,029) (180,502) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 38,671 45,914 54,513 64,722 76,844 91,235 108,322 128,609 152,696 181,294 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (6,079) (7,218) (8,570) (10,175) (12,080) (14,343) (17,029) (20,218) (24,005) (28,500) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 32,592 38,696 45,943 54,548 64,764 76,893 91,294 108,391 128,691 152,793 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (2,737) (3,437) (4,239) (6,767) (17,847) (21,099) (24,784) (28,759) (33,033) (38,097) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 29,855 35,259 41,704 47,781 46,917 55,794 66,509 79,632 95,659 114,697 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 38.7% 38.5% 38.3% 37.0% 30.6% 30.6% 30.8% 31.0% 31.4% 31.7% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 29,855 35,259 41,704 47,781 46,917 55,794 66,509 79,632 95,659 114,697 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (10,151) (11,988) (14,180) (16,245) (15,952) (18,970) (22,613) (27,075) (32,524) (38,997) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 19,704 23,271 27,525 31,535 30,965 36,824 43,896 52,557 63,135 75,700 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 25.5% 25.4% 25.3% 24.4% 20.2% 20.2% 20.3% 20.5% 20.7% 20.9% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 22,441 26,708 31,764 38,302 48,812 57,923 68,680 81,316 96,167 113,796 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 19,704 23,271 27,525 31,535 30,965 36,824 43,896 52,557 63,135 75,700 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 2,737 3,437 4,239 6,767 17,847 21,099 24,784 28,759 33,033 38,097 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 10,873 12,909 15,327 18,197 21,605 25,652 30,456 36,592 43,515 52,041 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 52 62 74 88 104 124 147 174 213 266 410 Working Capital - Return On 1,652 1,961 2,329 2,765 3,283 3,898 4,628 6,593 9,005 12,177 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 8,848 10,505 12,473 14,808 17,582 20,875 24,784 28,759 33,033 38,097 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 187 223 264 314 372 442 525 623 740 879 1,043 Workforce - Return On 133 158 187 222 264 313 372 442 524 623 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 11,569 13,799 16,437 20,105 27,207 32,271 38,225 44,725 52,652 61,756 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 10.50 9.50 8.50 7.50 6.50 5.50 4.50 3.50 2.50 1.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.32 0.36 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.62 0.69 0.76 0.85 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 3,747 4,975 6,598 8,986 13,538 17,879 23,577 30,714 40,256 52,569 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 1/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2044 2043 2042 2041 2040 2039 2038 2037 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT 2025 2036 BRL '000 120,180,052 115,821,906 111,621,801 107,574,006 103,672,998 99,913,455 96,290,246 92,798,426 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 59,571,759 89,433,233 956,643 921,952 888,519 856,298 825,245 795,319 766,478 738,683 711,896 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 1.5% 1.9% 2.3% 2.9% 3.6% 4.4% 5.4% 6.6% 8.2% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 1.7% 2.1% 2.6% 3.2% 4.0% 4.9% 6.0% 7.4% 9.1% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 16,462 19,545 23,205 27,551 32,711 38,838 46,111 54,747 65,000 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (8,213) (9,751) (11,577) (13,746) (16,320) (19,376) (23,005) (27,314) (32,429) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 8,249 9,794 11,628 13,806 16,391 19,461 23,106 27,433 32,571 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (1,297) (1,540) (1,828) (2,170) (2,577) (3,059) (3,632) (4,313) (5,120) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 6,952 8,254 9,800 11,635 13,815 16,402 19,474 23,121 27,451 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (407) (503) (623) (770) (950) (1,158) (1,398) (1,723) (2,133) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 6,545 7,751 9,178 10,865 12,864 15,244 18,076 21,397 25,317 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 39.8% 39.7% 39.5% 39.4% 39.3% 39.3% 39.2% 39.1% 38.9% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 6,545 7,751 9,178 10,865 12,864 15,244 18,076 21,397 25,317 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (2,225) (2,635) (3,120) (3,694) (4,374) (5,183) (6,146) (7,275) (8,608) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 4,320 5,116 6,057 7,171 8,490 10,061 11,930 14,122 16,710 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 26.2% 26.2% 26.1% 26.0% 26.0% 25.9% 25.9% 25.8% 25.7% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 4,727 5,619 6,680 7,941 9,441 11,219 13,328 15,846 18,843 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 4,320 5,116 6,057 7,171 8,490 10,061 11,930 14,122 16,710 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 407 503 623 770 950 1,158 1,398 1,723 2,133 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 2,319 2,754 3,269 3,882 4,609 5,472 6,496 7,713 9,158 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 11 13 16 19 22 26 31 37 44 410 Working Capital - Return On 352 418 497 590 700 831 987 1,172 1,391 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 1,887 2,241 2,660 3,159 3,750 4,453 5,287 6,277 7,452 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 40 47 56 67 79 94 112 133 158 1,043 Workforce - Return On 28 34 40 47 56 67 79 94 112 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 2,407 2,865 3,410 4,060 4,832 5,747 6,831 8,133 9,685 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 19.50 18.50 17.50 16.50 15.50 14.50 13.50 12.50 11.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.17 0.19 0.21 0.23 0.26 0.29 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 297 393 521 690 915 1,211 1,603 2,125 2,817 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 2/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2053 2052 2051 2050 2049 2048 2047 2046 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT 2025 2045 BRL '000 167,574,346 161,497,517 155,641,055 149,996,969 144,557,558 139,315,398 134,263,337 129,394,481 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 59,571,759 124,702,188 1,333,905 1,285,533 1,238,915 1,193,988 1,150,690 1,108,962 1,068,747 1,029,990 992,639 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.2% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 0.7% 0.8% 1.0% 1.3% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% 0.9% 1.1% 1.4% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 3,511 4,169 4,950 5,877 6,978 8,284 9,836 11,678 13,865 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (1,752) (2,080) (2,470) (2,932) (3,481) (4,133) (4,907) (5,826) (6,917) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 1,760 2,089 2,480 2,945 3,496 4,151 4,929 5,852 6,948 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (277) (328) (390) (463) (550) (653) (775) (920) (1,092) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 1,483 1,761 2,090 2,482 2,947 3,499 4,154 4,932 5,856 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (62) (77) (95) (117) (144) (178) (219) (269) (330) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 1,420 1,684 1,996 2,365 2,803 3,321 3,935 4,663 5,525 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 40.5% 40.4% 40.3% 40.2% 40.2% 40.1% 40.0% 39.9% 39.8% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 1,420 1,684 1,996 2,365 2,803 3,321 3,935 4,663 5,525 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (483) (572) (679) (804) (953) (1,129) (1,338) (1,585) (1,879) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 938 1,111 1,317 1,561 1,850 2,192 2,597 3,078 3,647 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 26.7% 26.7% 26.6% 26.6% 26.5% 26.5% 26.4% 26.4% 26.3% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 1,000 1,188 1,412 1,678 1,994 2,370 2,816 3,346 3,977 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 938 1,111 1,317 1,561 1,850 2,192 2,597 3,078 3,647 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 62 77 95 117 144 178 219 269 330 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 495 587 697 828 983 1,167 1,386 1,645 1,953 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 410 Working Capital - Return On 75 89 106 126 149 177 211 250 297 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 403 478 568 674 800 950 1,128 1,339 1,590 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 9 10 12 14 17 20 24 28 34 1,043 Workforce - Return On 6 7 9 10 12 14 17 20 24 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 505 601 715 850 1,011 1,202 1,430 1,701 2,024 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 28.50 27.50 26.50 25.50 24.50 23.50 22.50 21.50 20.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 24 31 42 55 73 96 128 169 224 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 3/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2061 2060 2059 2058 2057 2056 2055 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT 2025 2054 BRL '000 225,185,795 217,019,775 209,149,883 201,565,381 194,255,920 187,211,524 180,422,583 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 59,571,759 173,879,833 1,792,497 1,727,495 1,664,850 1,604,477 1,546,293 1,490,219 1,436,178 1,384,097 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 889 1,056 1,254 1,488 1,767 2,098 2,491 2,958 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (444) (527) (625) (743) (882) (1,047) (1,243) (1,476) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 446 529 628 746 885 1,051 1,248 1,482 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (70) (83) (99) (117) (139) (165) (196) (233) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 376 446 529 629 746 886 1,052 1,249 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (12) (15) (18) (22) (27) (33) (41) (51) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 364 431 512 607 719 853 1,011 1,198 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 40.9% 40.9% 40.8% 40.8% 40.7% 40.6% 40.6% 40.5% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 364 431 512 607 719 853 1,011 1,198 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (124) (147) (174) (206) (245) (290) (344) (407) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 240 285 338 400 475 563 667 791 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 27.0% 27.0% 26.9% 26.9% 26.9% 26.8% 26.8% 26.7% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 252 299 355 422 502 596 708 842 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 240 285 338 400 475 563 667 791 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 12 15 18 22 27 33 41 51 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 125 149 177 210 249 296 351 417 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 410 Working Capital - Return On 19 23 27 32 38 45 53 63 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 102 121 144 171 203 241 286 339 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 2 3 3 4 4 5 6 7 1,043 Workforce - Return On 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 127 150 179 213 253 301 357 425 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 36.50 35.50 34.50 33.50 32.50 31.50 30.50 29.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 3 3 4 6 8 10 14 18 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 4/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2069 2068 2067 2066 2065 2064 2063 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT 2025 2062 BRL '000 302,603,852 291,630,384 281,054,852 270,862,826 261,040,397 251,574,165 242,451,211 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 59,571,759 233,659,087 2,408,751 2,321,401 2,237,219 2,156,090 2,077,903 2,002,551 1,929,931 1,859,945 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 225 267 317 377 448 531 631 749 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (112) (133) (158) (188) (223) (265) (315) (374) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 113 134 159 189 224 266 316 375 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (18) (21) (25) (30) (35) (42) (50) (59) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 95 113 134 159 189 224 266 316 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (2) (3) (3) (4) (5) (6) (8) (10) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 93 110 131 155 184 218 259 307 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 41.2% 41.2% 41.2% 41.1% 41.1% 41.0% 41.0% 41.0% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 93 110 131 155 184 218 259 307 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (32) (37) (44) (53) (63) (74) (88) (104) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 61 73 86 102 121 144 171 202 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 27.2% 27.2% 27.2% 27.1% 27.1% 27.1% 27.1% 27.0% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 64 75 90 106 126 150 178 212 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 61 73 86 102 121 144 171 202 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 2 3 3 4 5 6 8 10 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 32 38 45 53 63 75 89 106 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 410 Working Capital - Return On 5 6 7 8 10 11 14 16 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 26 31 36 43 51 61 72 86 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1,043 Workforce - Return On 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 32 38 45 53 63 75 90 106 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 44.50 43.50 42.50 41.50 40.50 39.50 38.50 37.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 5/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2075 2076 2074 2073 2072 2071 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT 2025 2070 BRL '000 377,680,487 391,891,848 363,984,479 350,785,136 338,064,447 325,805,054 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 59,571,759 313,990,230 3,119,491 3,006,367 2,897,346 2,792,278 2,691,020 2,593,434 2,499,388 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 68 80 95 113 135 160 190 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (34) (40) (48) (57) (67) (80) (95) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 34 40 48 57 67 80 95 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (5) (6) (8) (9) (11) (13) (15) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 29 34 40 48 57 67 80 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 28 33 40 47 56 66 78 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 41.5% 41.4% 41.4% 41.4% 41.3% 41.3% 41.3% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 28 33 40 47 56 66 78 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (10) (11) (13) (16) (19) (22) (27) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 19 22 26 31 37 44 52 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 27.4% 27.4% 27.3% 27.3% 27.3% 27.3% 27.2% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 19 23 27 32 38 45 53 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 19 22 26 31 37 44 52 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 10 11 13 16 19 23 27 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 410 Working Capital - Return On 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 8 9 11 13 15 18 22 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,043 Workforce - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 10 11 13 16 19 23 27 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 51.50 50.50 49.50 48.50 47.50 46.50 45.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 6/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2083 2082 2081 2080 2079 2078 2077 2025 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT BRL '000 507,525,663 489,121,017 471,383,788 454,289,773 437,815,645 421,938,927 406,637,955 59,571,759 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 4,039,945 3,893,443 3,752,253 3,616,183 3,485,048 3,358,668 3,236,871 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 20 24 29 34 40 48 57 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (10) (12) (14) (17) (20) (24) (28) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 10 12 14 17 20 24 29 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (2) (2) (2) (3) (3) (4) (4) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 9 10 12 14 17 20 24 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 8 10 12 14 17 20 24 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 41.6% 41.6% 41.6% 41.6% 41.6% 41.5% 41.5% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 8 10 12 14 17 20 24 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (3) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 6 7 8 9 11 13 16 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 27.5% 27.5% 27.5% 27.4% 27.4% 27.4% 27.4% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 6 7 8 10 11 14 16 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 6 7 8 9 11 13 16 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 410 Working Capital - Return On 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,043 Workforce - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 58.50 57.50 56.50 55.50 54.50 53.50 52.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 7/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2090 2089 2088 2087 2086 2085 2084 2025 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT BRL '000 657,279,042 633,443,818 610,472,942 588,335,070 566,999,994 546,438,603 526,622,839 59,571,759 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 5,231,994 5,042,264 4,859,414 4,683,195 4,513,366 4,349,695 4,191,960 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 6 7 9 10 12 14 17 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (3) (4) (4) (5) (6) (7) (9) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 3 4 4 5 6 7 9 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (0) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 3 3 4 4 5 6 7 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 3 3 4 4 5 6 7 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 41.8% 41.8% 41.7% 41.7% 41.7% 41.7% 41.7% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 3 3 4 4 5 6 7 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (2) (2) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 27.6% 27.6% 27.6% 27.5% 27.5% 27.5% 27.5% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 410 Working Capital - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,043 Workforce - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 65.50 64.50 63.50 62.50 61.50 60.50 59.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 8/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2097 2096 2095 2094 2093 2092 2091 2025 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT BRL '000 851,219,496 820,351,317 790,602,525 761,932,528 734,302,205 707,673,853 682,011,138 59,571,759 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 6,775,776 6,530,063 6,293,260 6,065,044 5,845,105 5,633,141 5,428,864 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (1) (1) (1) (2) (2) (2) (3) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 41.9% 41.9% 41.9% 41.8% 41.8% 41.8% 41.8% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (0) (0) (0) (0) (1) (1) (1) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 27.6% 27.6% 27.6% 27.6% 27.6% 27.6% 27.6% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 410 Working Capital - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,043 Workforce - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 72.50 71.50 70.50 69.50 68.50 67.50 66.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 9/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2102 2101 2100 2099 2098 2025 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT BRL '000 1,023,882,157 986,752,629 950,969,547 916,484,084 883,249,184 59,571,759 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 8,150,184 7,854,630 7,569,794 7,295,287 7,030,735 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 1 1 1 1 2 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (0) (0) (1) (1) (1) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 0 0 1 1 1 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 0 0 0 1 1 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 0 0 0 1 1 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 41.9% 41.9% 41.9% 41.9% 41.9% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 0 0 0 1 1 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 0 0 0 0 0 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 27.7% 27.7% 27.7% 27.7% 27.7% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 0 0 0 0 0 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 0 0 0 0 0 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 0 0 0 0 0 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 0 0 0 0 0 410 Working Capital - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 0 0 0 0 0 1,043 Workforce - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 77.50 76.50 75.50 74.50 73.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 0 0 0 0 0 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 10/10

BRAND ▪ DESCRIPTION Trademarks, logos, and the like have value for a business, as they allow consumers to easily identify a business through its products and services . As they are perceived by the public, they have the ability to generate consistent demand for the company's items . They can, therefore, allow revenue growth by increasing the number of units sold or charging prices higher than those used by similar companies, but without the benefit of these assets in question . Below is a description of BRF's main brands . o Sadia: Sadia is a Brazilian brand founded in 1944, specializing in industrialized foods, with a focus on frozen and chilled products of animal origin, such as sausages, chicken and pork cuts, ready meals, pizzas, pasta and side dishes. It is widely distributed in national retail and present in international markets. o Perdigão: Created in 1934, Perdigão is a Brazilian brand that operates in the processed and frozen food segments, with a portfolio similar to Sadia's, including hams, sausages, lasagna, seasoned meats, ready meals and margarine. The brand shares distribution channels with other BRF brands. o Miss Daisy: Miss Daisy is a brand focused on the segment of refrigerated and frozen ready meals, such as roasted meats, side dishes and complete meals. Its presence is mainly concentrated in Brazilian retail, with a focus on convenience and offering ready - to - eat meals. o Nebraska: Nebraska is a brand used by BRF for products in the pork portfolio, such as ribs, loin and ham, aimed mainly at butchers and the food service channel, with specific cuts for professional use. o Gold: BRF's Gold is a line aimed at the institutional market and food service , focusing on meat and products with technical specifications aimed at establishments such as restaurants, hotels and industrial kitchens. The products in the line include standardized cuts and food inputs. o Qualy/ Claybon/ Deline: These three brands make up BRF's portfolio of margarines and vegetable creams. Qualy: It is a brand of margarine widely distributed in Brazil, with traditional, salt, unsalted and light versions . Claybon: It is mainly intended for culinary use, such as in baking and confectionery, being sold in larger formats. Deline : It is a regional brand of margarine, also focusing on domestic and culinary use. o Banvit: Banvit is a brand of Turkish origin acquired by BRF in 2017. It operates in the production and marketing of chicken meat and processed products, such as hamburgers, breaded meats and sausages, aimed at the market in Turkey and neighboring regions. The company operates with vertical integration in its production chain. ▪ VALUATION METHODOLOGY The fair value of the brand was estimated using the Royalty Relief Methodology, which is derived from the income approach . Through this model, also known as the Royalty Waiver Method, we calculate the value of the asset, capitalizing on the royalties that are saved by the company owning the intangible . In other words, the owner does not have to pay rent or royalties to a third party to use the asset . 1

Methodological application requires determining a hypothetical royalty rate, which is typically expressed as a percentage of revenue . The result is multiplied by the projected net revenue for the company for the entire useful life of the object of analysis . Subsequently, the cash flow from royalty payments is deducted from income tax and brought to present value at an appropriate risk rate to define the value of the intangible . ▪ VALUATION CRITERIA – BRAND The following steps were applied in the valuation of the fair value of the brand, using the Royalty Relief methodology : o Revenue attributable to the brand − 100% of the revenues from the business were considered to be generated under the company's brands. o Determination of the royalty rate − Information from the Markables and Royalty Source databases, as well as the internal APSIS database, was used to locate the transactions of licenses of use involving brands similar to BRF's brands. In addition, qualitative factors related to the intangible were appraised. After analysis, a royalty rate of 2.0% was concluded to be applied to the projected net operating revenue. o Income Tax Deduction − Royalty payments are deducted by the income tax rate weighted by the countries of operation, for the entire life of the asset. A tax deduction of 33.6% was used. o Application of the discount rate − Royalty savings are brought to present value at the appropriate rate of return. We determined a discount rate for the brands, equal to the WACC calculated by APSIS for BRF, shown in attachment 1A. o Tax benefit of amortization − As the asset does not have a defined useful life, it was not considered a tax benefit in this analysis. ▪ CONCLUSION Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 1 D, we concluded a fair value of R $ 10 , 753 , 098 thousand, without a defined useful life for BRF's brands . 2

RELIEF FROM ROYALTY (CONSOLIDA) 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 TRADEMARK BRL '000 69,056,912 66,552,668 64,139,237 61,813,325 59,571,759 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% Royalty Rate (% NOR) 1,346,610 1,297,777 1,250,715 1,205,360 1,161,649 TOTAL ROYALTIES 1,346,610 1,297,777 1,250,715 1,205,360 1,161,649 ROYALTIES SAVINGS - PRE TAX 33.6% 33.6% 33.6% 33.6% 33.6% IR/CSLL 894,595 862,154 830,890 800,759 771,720 ROYALTIES SAVINGS - AFTER TAX 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 4.50 3.50 2.50 1.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.62 0.69 0.76 0.85 0.95 11.3% Discount Rate @ 12,9% 551,795 592,065 635,273 681,635 731,381 Discounted Cash Flow 551,795 Remaining Value 7,560,949 3.8% Perpetuity @ 3.8% TRADEMARK VALUE 10,753,098 1/1

INVENTORY ▪ DESCRIPTION The inventory recorded in the BRF balance sheet on the valuation date of this Report comprises the following classifications : o Raw material; o Finished products; o Products in preparation; o Packaging materials; o Secondary materials; o Warehouse; o Imports in progress; and o Others. ▪ VALUATION METHODOLOGY According to good valuation practices, the value of the inventory must be measured separately between raw materials, products in preparation and finished products . o Raw material − The fair value of the raw material must be valuated based on the value that a market participant would be able to achieve with the sale of this material in the most advantageous scenario, on the valuation date of the Report, that is, according to the replacement cost . o Finished products − The valuation of finished products must consider the selling price less all expenses related to the disposal of items, such as marketing expenses, commissions, transportation and packaging, as well as a profit margin relative to the degree of risk of these costs . In addition, the time it takes for the company to sell the goods and the time to receive the money must also be considered . o Products in preparation – The fair value of products in preparation must be valuated in the same way as finished products ; however, the cost of completing the production of the good must also be considered . ▪ VALUATION CRITERIA Below, we detail the assumptions used in the valuation of BRF inventory on the valuation date of this Report, segmented by type of component classification . o Raw material − Following discussions with the company's management, the book value was considered a proxy for the fair value of the raw material . This material has a high inventory turnover, and there have been no significant variations in its cost, with the historical cost being close to the replacement cost . 1

o Finished products − For the valuation of finished products, the following assumptions were used. The sale value of the finished products was estimated by applying the company's gross margin, on the valuation date of this Report, to the respective book values of the items. The disposal costs applied in the valuation of the finished products were based on the marketing expenses paid by the customers informed in conversations with the company's management. Selling costs were estimated at 13.8% of the NOR of the valuation date. The profit margin applied to the sales effort was calculated by multiplying the sale value of the inventory by the company's profit margin before income tax (EBIT), on the valuation date of the Report, and the result was subsequently multiplied by the percentage that the disposal cost represents of the company's total costs. For the calculations of the storage cost, which is related tothe time between the sale of inventory and the receipt of cash, the number of days of inventory turnover and the company's accounts receivable on the valuation date of the Report was considered, multiplied by the return of pre - tax working capital. ▪ CONCLUSION Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 1F, we conclude a fair value of R$7,466,026 thousand and an indefinite useful life for BRF's inventory. 2

ESTOQUE_A_MERCADO December 2024 VALUATION OF INVENTORY PRODUCTS | BRL '000 BRF ASSUMPTIONS 30.6% Gross Margin Dec/24 9.7% EBIT margin Dec/24 13.8% Cost of Disposal (% of Revenue) Dec/24 1.9 Inventory period (months) Dec/24 5.5% Cost of Capital (Working Capital) (Kd post tax) FINISHED PRODUCTS 3,524,872 Book Value 5,075,830 Estimated Selling Price = TOTAL cost/(1 - Gross MARGIN) 700,400 ( - ) Cost of disposal = Sales x % Disposal Costs 74,920 ( - ) Profit on draining effort = Sales x EBIT x (% Outlet Cost/% Total Cost) 4,300,510 GROSS REALISABLE VALUE 37,615 ( - ) Storage costs = Gross Value x (Stocking Period/12 months) x Cost of Capital NET REALISABLE VALUE 4,262,896 Capital gain after inventory costs Capital gain (% of finished goods book balance) 738,024 20.9% 1/1

BALANÇO CONSOLIDADO BRF ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS MARKET VALUE ADJUSTMENTS ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS BALANCE SHEET BRF (BRL '000) BALANCES AT DEC 2024 BALANCES AT DEC 2024 31,568,239 738,024 30,830,215 CURRENTS ASSETS 11,165,364 - 11,165,364 Cash and cash equivalents 894,080 - 894,080 Bonds and securities 6,107,292 - 6,107,292 Accounts receivable 7,466,026 738,024 6,728,002 Inventory 2,214,189 - 2,214,189 Recoverable taxes 2,844,633 - 2,844,633 Biological assets 851 - 851 Prepaid expenses 875,804 - 875,804 Other current assets 63,499,107 31,654,240 31,844,867 NON - CURRENT ASSETS 9,974,145 - 9,974,145 LONG - TERM REALISABLE 2,331,012 - 2,331,012 Deferred taxes LT 4,545,723 - 4,545,723 Recoverable taxes LT 30,655 - 30,655 Accounts receivable LT 323,811 - 323,811 Bonds and securities LT 955,707 - 955,707 Other non current assets 1,787,237 - 1,787,237 Biological assets 129,323 - 129,323 INVESTIMENTS 129,323 - 129,323 Holdings in subsidiaries and associates 37,404,850 25,525,391 11,879,459 FIXED ASSETS 2,612,212 1,984,312 627,900 Land 15,578,119 10,134,901 5,443,218 Buildings and Facilities 18,397,962 13,403,704 4,994,258 Machinery and equipment 150,791 2,487 148,304 Furniture and Utensils 1,004 (13) 1,017 Vehicles 645,621 - 645,621 Fixed Assets in Progress 19,720 - 19,720 Advances to suppliers (579) - (579) Others 12,802,019 6,128,849 6,673,170 INTANGIBLE ASSETS - (3,771,263) 3,771,263 Goodwill 10,753,098 8,746,831 2,006,267 Trademark - (2,551) 2,551 Non - compete agreements 1,411,973 1,411,973 - Integrated Supplier Relationship 1,237 - 1,237 Patents 364,155 (256,141) 620,296 Customer relationship 233,865 - 233,865 Software 37,691 - 37,691 Other intangible assets 3,188,770 - 3,188,770 FIXED ASSETS RIGHT OF USE 3,188,770 - 3,188,770 Ridght of Use 95,067,346 32,392,264 62,675,082 TOTAL ASSETS 1/2

BALANÇO CONSOLIDADO BRF ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS MARKET VALUE ADJUSTMENTS ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS BALANCE SHEET BRF (BRL '000) BALANCES AT DEC 2024 BALANCES AT DEC 2024 20,820,572 - 20,820,572 CURRENT LIABILITIES 1,230,273 - 1,230,273 Loans and financing 14,573,097 - 14,573,097 Suppliers 1,141,944 - 1,141,944 Tax obligations 946,937 - 946,937 Wages, benefits and social charges payable 692,650 - 692,650 Provisions 2,235,671 - 2,235,671 Other payables 40,815,571 15,460,276 25,355,295 NON - CURRENT LIABILITIES 40,815,571 15,460,276 25,355,295 LONG - TERM LIABILITIES 19,510,275 - 19,510,275 Loans and financing LT 2,989,882 - 2,989,882 Suppliers LT 1,933 - 1,933 Deferred tax liabilities LT 8,277,200 6,737,736 1,539,464 Provision for contingencies LT 467,127 - 467,127 Benefits LT 846,614 846,614 Other non current liabilities 8,722,539 8,722,539 - Deferred income tax capital gains 33,431,193 16,931,988 16,499,205 SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY 13,349,156 - 13,349,156 Share capital 2,621,755 - 2,621,755 Capital reserve 2,079,253 - 2,079,253 Profit reserve (1,345,657) - (1,345,657) Treasury Shares (1,618,855) - (1,618,855) Other Comprehensive Income 1,602,941 189,388 1,413,553 Attributed to non - controlling shareholders 16,742,600 16,742,600 - Market Adjustments 95,067,336 32,392,264 62,675,072 TOTAL LIABILITIES 31,828,252 16,742,600 15,085,652 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY - CONTROLLING (BRL' 000) 2/2

ATTACHMENT 2

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF FIXED ASSETS The values below consider the valuation date of December 31 st , 2024 and are based on the fact that there are no impediments to the objects, whether debts, registrations without legal challenges, construction or tax irregularities (including deferred liabilities), environmental liabilities, among other obstacles: Company: BRF Valuation date: 31/12/2024 1 CAPITAL GAIN FAIR VALUE REPRODUCTION VALUE NET BOOK VALUE RUL ACCOUNTING BALANCE 13,403,704,301.79 R$ 18,519,461,091.76 R$ 23,984,346,577.76 R$ 5,115,756,789.97 R$ 4.9 Machinery and equipment 10,134,900,771.37 R$ 18,326,663,728.01 R$ 21,641,707,567.00 R$ 8,191,762,956.64 R$ 45.7 Buildings, improvements and leasehold improvements - R$ 665,341,235.47 R$ 665,341,235.47 R$ 665,341,235.47 R$ N/A Fixed assets under construction 2,486,756.40 R$ 150,730,906.39 R$ 273,727,759.76 R$ 148,244,149.99 R$ 6.4 Furniture and fixtures 13,106.70 - R$ 221,370,128.31 R$ 502,566,259.17 R$ 221,383,235.01 R$ 3.9 Vehicles 1,984,312,320.99 R$ 2,710,054,470.96 R$ 2,710,054,470.96 R$ 725,742,149.97 R$ N/A Lands 25,525,391,043.84 R$ 40,593,621,560.89 R$ 49,777,743,870.12 R$ 15,068,230,517.05 R$ Total R$ - R$ 3,188,770,000.00 N/A R$ 3,188,770,000.00 Right - of - use ASSETS 25,525,391,043.84 R$ 37,404,851,560.89 R$ 49,777,743,870.12 R$ 11,879,460,517.05 R$ Total excluding Right - of - use ASSETS

2. INTRODUCTION In the preparation of this work, data and information provided by third parties were used, in the form of documents and verbal interviews with the client. The estimates used in this process are based on: ▪ Analytical fixed assets for December 31 st , 2024; ▪ Third - party appraisal reports from BRF; ▪ Summary table of BRF's third - party reports containing the details of the appraisal by asset. 2

3. KEY STEPSS Analysis of documentation provided by management Discussions with the client to understand the documentation provided And sent of the report for independent internal review Implementation of any suggested improvements and changes Issuance of final report 3

4. CAVEATS AND PREMISES 1. CAVEATS During the performance of the work, some limitations and specific premises were adopted, as described below: 1. Simplified Methodology : The valuation was conducted based on a simplified methodology, according to objectives previously defined with the client. 2. Absence of Market Quotation : Market quotations were not made for all the items valuated. As a result, parameters and reference bases available internally or provided by third parties were used. 3. Failure to Reach the Percentage of 80% Quoted: The survey did not reach the minimum percentage of 80% of the items with values obtained through direct quotations or reliable external sources. 4. Absence of Physical Inspections : No physical inspections were carried out for the on - site verification of assets. Thus, the physical, functional and operational conditions of the assets were considered based on information provided by the company and/or third parties, without direct validation by the technical team responsible for the valuation. 5. Use of Third - Party Valuations: In this work, values and information from valuations carried out by third parties were considered. The veracity, accuracy and timeliness of these data were assumed to be correct, and were not subject to verification by the team responsible for this report. 4

2. ASSUMPTIONS The following assumptions were adopted for the valuation of each accounting class: 1. Equipment, tools, installations and others The mobile assets acquired between 2022 and 2024 were revalued using market indices published monthly by FGV. The selection of the indices took into account the asset category and its cost variation in the period valuated, ensuring the adherence of the values to the market. 2. Buildings and improvements For real estate, the INCC was applied as a factor for updating the original costs. This index reflects variations in construction costs and ensures the compatibility of the updated values with market conditions. 3. Land All land was held at the client's historical cost, since there is no specific index applicable for updating this type of asset. In the case of the valuations carried out for the land, the values calculated in each valuation were preserved. 4. Other entries In the cases of assets older than three years that were not valuated in the third - party report, as well as fixed assets in progress, right - of - use assets and leases, the book residual value was used as an approximation of the fair value, in view of the absence of specific valuations and the limitation of data. Assets registered with a symbolic value of R$ 0.01, usually corresponding to physical leftovers or residual components, were treated according to general procedures. Due to deadline restrictions, individual quotation of these items was not carried out. 5

5. VALUATION METHODOLOGY The methodology applied followed established technical procedures to ensure the proper measurement of the assets, as detailed below. 1. COST REPRODUCTION HISTORICAL COST METHOD When the value of the asset is determined from the monetary adjustment of its acquisition cost, the historical cost method is adopted, with the calculation of accounting records and the application of specific indexes, generally used by competent official bodies. The valuation of BRF's assets followed technical and methodological guidelines in line with the best market practices, considering the nature and specificities of the assets valuated. The main assumptions adopted were: ▪ Valuation criterion: we chose to use the historical cost method, considering the update of accounting costs incurred between 2022 and 2024 and the update of values from the third - party valuation mentioned above. ▪ Update indexes: market indexes released monthly by the Getúlio Vargas Foundation (FGV) were used for each type of asset. In the case of real estate, the National Construction Cost Index (INCC) was used. 6

5.2. DEPRECIATION OF ASSETS Straight - line depreciation The calculation of asset depreciation was carried out using the straight - line depreciation method, which assumes that the wear and tear of the asset operates in a linear manner over time, decreasing the value of the asset by a fixed amount each period, until the net value reaches zero. This model provides the present value, depreciated, relative to the age "x" of the improvement at the time of appraisal, through the formula below. ܖ ( ܖ — ܠ ) ۹ ܌ = ۾ ܌ + ۾ ܚ 7 Being: Kd = depreciation coefficient; Pd = depreciable portion, in decimal form; Pr = residual portion, in decimal form; n = service life; x = apparent age. 1. Asset age or operating age (x) The assets that were valued based on the third - party report had their fair values updated, and the corresponding depreciation was applied, taking into account the date of the previous valuation and the valuation date of the current work . For the other items not covered by this valuation, the age of the assets was based on the date of acquisition contained in the fixed asset analytical file sent by the company's management . 2. Estimated service life (n) According to primary concepts of mechanical design, every machine is formed by the composition of elements whose set, at the beginning of its operational life, obeys a law of decrease in its work capacity, which is generically represented by three cycles, described below . ▪ Break - in: adjustment cycle with loss of material, commonly followed by an improvement in the operation of the assembly. ▪ Operation : cycle in which the machine is at its normal production capacity and the loss of material in wear is slow and negligible. However, over the course of time called "operational useful life", the set loses its performance to the point where it must undergo partial or total reconditioning, before an irreversible collapse.

▪ Collapse: in this cycle, the removal of the material that occurred in the operation phase culminates in the collapse, making the machine unrecoverable, and only what is called "residual state or value" remains. 5.2.3. Residual value (Pr) The residual value is related to the operational useful life of the asset, representing the portion of the value that will not be depreciated at the end of this useful life, as indicated in the following table, by asset class: 8 RV EUL ACCOUNTING BALANCE 5% 14 Machinery and equipment 5% 60 Buildings, improvements and leasehold improvements N/A N/A Fixed assets under construction 2% 13 Furniture and fixtures 5% 5 Vehicles N/A N/A Lands

6. RESULT In accordance with the technical procedures applied and after carrying out the necessary due diligence, the appraisers determined the following fair values: 9 R$ - R$ 3,188,770,000.00 N/A R$ 3,188,770,000.00 Right - of - use ASSETS 25,525,391,043.84 R$ 37,404,851,560.89 R$ 49,777,743,870.12 R$ 11,879,460,517.05 R$ Total excluding Right - of - use ASSETS Company: BRF Valuation date: 31/12/2024 CAPITAL GAIN FAIR VALUE REPRODUCTION VALUE NET BOOK VALUE RUL ACCOUNTING BALANCE 13,403,704,301.79 R$ 18,519,461,091.76 R$ 23,984,346,577.76 R$ 5,115,756,789.97 R$ 4.9 Machinery and equipment 10,134,900,771.37 R$ 18,326,663,728.01 R$ 21,641,707,567.00 R$ 8,191,762,956.64 R$ 45.7 Buildings, improvements and leasehold improvements - R$ 665,341,235.47 R$ 665,341,235.47 R$ 665,341,235.47 R$ N/A Fixed assets under construction 2,486,756.40 R$ 150,730,906.39 R$ 273,727,759.76 R$ 148,244,149.99 R$ 6.4 Furniture and fixtures 13,106.70 - R$ 221,370,128.31 R$ 502,566,259.17 R$ 221,383,235.01 R$ 3.9 Vehicles 1,984,312,320.99 R$ 2,710,054,470.96 R$ 2,710,054,470.96 R$ 725,742,149.97 R$ N/A Lands 25,525,391,043.84 R$ 40,593,621,560.89 R$ 49,777,743,870.12 R$ 15,068,230,517.05 R$ Total

ATTACHMENT 3

CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP – LATIN AMERICA (LATAM) ▪ DESCRIPTION The intangible related to the customer relationship refers to the link established with the clientele of the Latin America business unit . In South America, MARFRIG has a structure composed of processing and slaughtering units, located in Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Uruguay, which serve the domestic and foreign markets of the Latin American region . Given this scenario, the specialists, together with the management, understood that there is a specific customer relationship linked to Latin American operations . ▪ VALUATION METHODOLOGY We employed the income approach and, specifically, the MPEEM to evaluate the customer relationship . This method is based on the concept that the fair value of an intangible asset is equal to the present value of the cash flows attributable to that asset . For cash flows to be realized, they must be net of the contribution of other assets, tangible or intangible . Using the analysis of the company’s overall projected results, the pre - tax cash flows associated with the customer relationship are calculated, considering the valuation date of the valuation . Similar to the company’s cash flow, the cost of goods sold, and other operating expenses are deducted from the projected revenue related to the intangible asset, resulting in the operating net profit . From this point, charges directly related to the specific customer relationship (Contributory Asset Charges or CAC) are deducted on the identified contributory assets . After determining the amount attributable to the customer relationship, it is necessary to consider the tax impact of the amortization of goodwill related to this intangible . Amortization is an economic benefit for the acquirer that reduces its effective expenditure on the acquisition ; Therefore, it must be taken into account in the valuation process . The present value of the tax amortization benefit of the customer relationship was calculated in accordance with current tax guidelines, which require compliance with the useful life of the asset . ▪ VALUATION CRITERIA The following steps were applied in the evaluation of the fair value of the customer relationship, using the MPEEM : o Revenue Determination − Revenue considers the existing customer relationship on the valuation date of the Report . Its evolution was projected according to the expected inflation rate . The entry of new customers was not considered in the calculation . To determine revenue, the net operating revenue (NOR) applied to the LATAM operation was considered, disregarding any effects of BRF's participation . o Churn rate − To determine the churn rate , the historical loss of customers was calculated based on the revenue attributable to each of them in the last three years . The churn rate was applied to the revenue of the customer relationship, representing the loss of customers annually . o Costs and expenses − The costs and expenses considered were based on the company's cash flow and multiplied by the percentage of remaining customers each year . 1

o CAC marca − The pre - tax charge of the trademark was based on the royalty rate considered for the portfolio of private labels in the operation of América do Súl, applied to the net revenue of América do Sul projected year by year . o Income Tax Deduction − The tax rate of 32 . 4 % was used, based on the LATAM tax rate, weighted by the rates of Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Uruguay, on the valuation date . o Other CACs − In order to isolate cash flows attributable solely to the customer relationship, we deduct charges from contributory assets, determining the economic return on the assets that contribute to such flows . The following is the post - tax contributory assets used . CAC fixed assets ( return on and return of ) − CAC on fixed assets represents a return on property, plant and equipment based on its fair value at the valuation date . For the customer relationship, an annual after - tax CAC of 5 . 0 % was used and applied to projected net revenue year - over - year . The depreciation of these assets was also considered, since their maintenance charges must be added to the calculation . CAC working capital − Working capital is necessary to support the operations of the business . An annual after - tax CAC of 5 . 0 % was applied, based on the company's financing rate . CAC workforce − Labor power is considered an element of goodwill , not a separately identified intangible asset . However, it is understood as an asset that contributes to the generation of the company's cash flow ; therefore, it is necessary to apply a CAC on the customer relationship . For this, a rate of return equal to the company's discount rate was contemplated . o Application of the discount rate − The after - tax cash flows, after the previously described adjustments, were brought to present value at the appropriate rate of return, given the nature of the asset . We have determined a discount rate equal to the WACC LATAM calculated by APSIS . o Determination of the useful life − The useful life of 05 years of the customer relationship was calculated based on the analysis of the historical churn rate presented by the clientele . o Tax benefit of amortization − We perform the calculation in accordance with the current tax guidelines, which require tax amortization according to the useful life of the asset . The result was added to the fair value of the customer relationship . ▪ CONCLUSION Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 3B, we concluded the fair value of R$ 1,806,977 thousand and the useful life of 05 years for the customer relationship of South America. 2

WORKING CAPITAL MPEEM 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 RETURN ON WORKING CAPITAL MARFRIG (BRL '000) 114,978,054 110,808,550 106,790,246 102,917,660 97,983,865 NET REVENUE (2,142,728) (2,065,025) (1,990,140) (1,892,333) (1,729,401) Initial Working Capital (80,627) (77,703) (74,885) (97,807) (162,932) Variation in Working Capital (2,223,354) (2,142,728) (2,065,025) (1,990,140) (1,892,333) Final Working Capital (2,183,041) (2,103,876) (2,027,582) (1,941,237) (1,810,867) Average Working Capital Balance (108,726) (104,783) (100,983) (96,683) (90,190) 5.0% Return on Working Capital ( Return On ) - 0.09% - 0.09% - 0.09% - 0.09% - 0.09% (% NOR) 1/4

FIXED ASSETS MKT VALUE (LATAM) 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 Valuation Date 31/12/2024 MARFRIG FIXED ASSETS (BRL '000) 873,266 738,009 681,768 578,590 553,874 - TOTAL INVESTIMENT (MAINTENANCE + EXPANSION) 266,750 194,848 131,493 75,251 24,716 - DEPRECIATION OF INVESTMENT 4,678,212 4,678,212 4,678,212 4,678,212 4,678,212 4,044,465 FIXED ASSET COST (ORIGINAL) 3,242,411 3,537,568 3,832,725 4,127,882 4,423,039 4,044,465 RESIDUAL VALUE 295,157 295,157 295,157 295,157 255,173 - DEPRECIATION OF ORIGINAL FIXED ASSET 561,907 490,005 426,650 370,408 279,889 255,173 TOTAL DEPRECIATION 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 31/12/2024 DEPRECIATION OF NEW FIXED ASSETS 49,432 49,432 49,432 49,432 24,716 2025 51,638 51,638 51,638 25,819 - 2026 60,846 60,846 30,423 - - 2027 65,866 32,933 - - - 2028 38,968 - - - - 2029 561,907 490,005 426,650 370,408 279,889 RETURN OF 266,750 194,848 131,493 75,251 24,716 DEPRECIATION OF INVESTMENT 295,157 295,157 295,157 295,157 255,173 DEPRECIATION OF ORIGINAL FIXED ASSET 292,199 278,270 265,741 254,203 242,196 5.0% RETURN ON 5,711,201 5,463,197 5,208,079 4,999,897 4,725,912 INITIAL BALANCE (561,907) (490,005) (426,650) (370,408) (279,889) DEPRECIATION 873,266 738,009 681,768 578,590 553,874 INVESTMENT (TOTAL) 6,022,561 5,711,201 5,463,197 5,208,079 4,999,897 FINAL BALANCE 5,866,881 5,587,199 5,335,638 5,103,988 4,862,904 AVERAGE BALANCE OF FIXED ASSETS 2/4

WORKFORCE (LATAM) Total Value 6 (M) Value per employee 5 (L) Training Cost 1 (k) Recruitment Cost 1 (J) Loss with Employee Replacement 4 (I) Lost productivity with employee replacement 3 (H) 1 WORKFORCE VALUATION (BRL '000) Total Employee Expense No. of months until reaching Initial (Annual) 2 full productivity¹ Productivity (E) (F) (G) 1 Other Benefits (D) Annual Charges 1 (C) Average Annual Salary per Employee 1 (B) 1 No of Emplyoees (A) Function 190,021 2,198 118 51 2,029 11% 100 3 13% 0 28 72 16150 TOTAL/ AVERAGE 20,805,279 TOTAL NET REVENUE 2024 190,021 Workforce Replacement Value 61,602 IR/ CSLL 128,420 POST - TAX WORKFORCE 1% (% Post - Tax Workforce/ Total Revenue) 3/4

INTANGIBLE MPEEM (LATAM) 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 CUSTOMER PORTFOLIO (BRL '000) 26,273,871 25,321,089 24,402,858 23,517,925 22,665,084 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 25,025,454 24,117,944 23,243,343 22,400,459 21,588,140 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CURRENT CUSTOMERS 31.9% 31.9% 31.9% 31.9% 31.9% Anual Churn Rate (%) 14.7% 21.5% 31.6% 46.4% 68.1% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 18.1% 26.6% 39.0% 57.2% 84.1% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 4,525,877 6,404,272 9,062,266 12,823,419 18,145,580 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 17.2% 25.3% 37.1% 54.5% 80.1% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (3,783,535) (5,353,832) (7,575,858) (10,720,100) (15,169,311) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 742,342 1,050,440 1,486,408 2,103,319 2,976,269 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 16.4% 16.4% 16.4% 16.4% 16.4% gross margin (GP/NOR) (331,456) (469,022) (663,683) (939,134) (1,330,060) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 410,886 581,417 822,726 1,164,185 1,646,208 EBITDA ( = ) 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% % EBITDA (96,793) (123,933) (158,441) (201,969) (224,078) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 314,093 457,484 664,285 962,216 1,422,131 EBIT ( = ) 6.9% 7.1% 7.3% 7.5% 7.8% % EBIT (67,718) (95,824) (135,594) (191,870) (271,502) TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 246,375 361,660 528,691 770,346 1,150,628 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (79,870) (117,244) (171,392) (249,733) (373,013) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 32.4% - 32.4% - 32.4% - 32.4% - 32.4% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 166,504 244,417 357,299 520,614 777,615 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 3.7% 3.8% 3.9% 4.1% 4.3% net margin (NP/NOR) 263,297 368,350 515,740 722,583 1,001,693 BALANCE INPUT 166,504 244,417 357,299 520,614 777,615 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 96,793 123,933 158,441 201,969 224,078 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 145,642 192,214 254,156 336,452 412,487 BALANCE OUTPUT (4,280) (6,056) (8,569) (12,047) (16,702) Working Capital - Return On 50,334 70,381 98,686 138,607 193,901 Fixed Assets - Return On 96,793 123,933 158,441 201,969 224,078 Fixed Assets - Return Of 2,796 3,956 5,598 7,922 11,210 Workforce - Return On 117,655 176,136 261,584 386,131 589,206 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 4.50 3.50 2.50 1.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.58 0.65 0.74 0.83 0.94 Discount Rate @ 12.9% 68,245 115,311 193,286 322,024 554,607 Discounted Cash Flow 114,294 Remaining Value 1,367,766 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 5 years Useful life of intangible 439,210 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 1,806,977 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 4/4

BRAND ▪ DESCRIPTION Trademarks, logos, and the like have value for a business, as they allow consumers to easily identify a business by its products and services . As they are perceived by the public, they have the ability to generate consistent demand for the company's items . They can, therefore, allow revenue growth by increasing the number of units sold or charging prices higher than those used by similar companies, but without the benefit of the asset in question . Below is a description of MARFRIG's main brands : o Bassi Angus: Bassi Angus is MARFRIG’s certified line of premium Angus beef products. o Bassi: With a 45 - year history, Bassi is MARFRIG’s traditional premium meat line. o Montana Steakhouse: This brand specializes in products for grilling, barbecuing, and stovetop preparation.. o Montana: Montana is a product line designed for everyday meat consumption. o GJ: Present in over 100 countries, GJ is MARFRIG’s brand dedicated to the international market. It offers a broad portfolio of beef products, including whole cuts, portioned cuts, steaks, giblets, and Frozen Cooked Beef, which comprises cooked and frozen meat items. o Pampeano: Pampeano includes a range of canned meat products made from selected raw materials and subject to the company’s quality control. The key strengths of these products are their practicality and versatility, as they are ready for immediate consumption. o Viva: Viva is a brand focused on meat produced with an emphasis on environmental sustainability. Its products carry the "Carbon Neutral Meat" seal, developed by EMBRAPA (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation), certifying efforts to offset greenhouse gas emissions. o Others: MARFRIG also owns other brands targeting specific niches, such as Plant Plus, dedicated to vegan food, and Bona Pet, which offers bones and snacks for the pet segment. ▪ VALUATION METHODOLOGY The fair value of the brand was estimated using the Royalty Relief Methodology, which is derived from the income approach . Through this model, also known as the Royalty Waiver Method, we calculate the value of the asset, capitalizing on the royalties that are saved by the company owning the intangible . In other words, the owner does not have to pay rent or royalties to a third party to use the asset . Methodological application requires determining a hypothetical royalty rate, which is typically expressed as a percentage of revenue . The result is multiplied by the projected net revenue for the company for the entire useful life of the object of analysis . Subsequently, the cash flow from royalty payments is deducted from income tax and brought to present value at an appropriate risk rate to define the value of the intangible . 1

For valuation purposes, the brands were segmented into value - added brands (appraised brands) and non - value - added or third - party brands, as informed by MARFRIG's management. In addition, a proportion was made based on the representativeness of the revenue attributed to each of these brands. Below, we present the revenue representativeness of each brand appraised. o South America: The brands appraised, together represent about 76.73% of the company's LATAM revenue. o North America: The brands appraised, together, represent about 19.51% of the company's North American revenue. ▪ VALUATION CRITERIA – SOUTH AMERICA The following steps were applied in the valuation of the fair value of the brand, using the Royalty Relief methodology : o Revenue attributable to the brand – For theS ul, 76.73% of the revenues from the business were considered to be generated under the appraised brands – LATAM. o Determination of the royalty rate − Information from the Markables and Royalty Source databases, as well as the internal APSIS database, was used to locate the transactions of use licenses involving brands in the meat and poultry food sector. In addition, qualitative factors related to the intangible were appraised. After analysis, a royalty rate of 2.0% was concluded to be applied on the projected NOR. o Income Tax Deduction − Royalty payments are deducted at the American - weighted income tax rate for the life of the asset. A tax deduction of 32.4% was used, a weighted rate between Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Uruguay. o Application of the discount rate − Royalty savings are brought to present value at the appropriate rate of return. We have determined a discount rate for LATAM brands equal to the WACC calculated by APSIS for the LATAM operation. o Tax benefit of amortization − As the asset does not have a defined useful life, it was not considered a tax benefit in this analysis. ▪ CONCLUSION – SOUTH AMERICA Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 3D, we concluded a fair value of R$ 2,674,617 thousand, without a defined useful life for MARFRIG's LATAM brands. 2

▪ VALUATION CRITERIA – NORTH AMERICA The following steps were applied in the valuation of the fair value of the brand, using the Royalty Relief methodology : o Revenue attributable to the brand – For theNorth American economy, 19.51% of the revenues from the business were considered to be generated under the appraised brands. o Determination of the royalty rate − Information from the Markables and Royalty Source databases, as well as the internal APSIS database, was used to locate the transactions of use licenses involving brands operating in the meat sector. In addition, qualitative factors related to the intangible were appraised. After analysis, a royalty rate of 0.6% was concluded to be applied to the projected NOR. o Income Tax Deduction − Royalty payments are deducted at the U.S. income tax rate for the life of the asset. A tax deduction of 26.5% was used, which takes into account the U.S. income tax rate (21%), plus the Delaware state rate (5.5%), which is levied on income. o Application of the discount rate − Royalty savings are brought to present value at the appropriate rate of return. We have determined a discount rate for the brands of NorthAmerica, equal to the WACC calculated by APSIS for the operation of MARFRIG in NorthAmerica. o Tax benefit of amortization − As the asset does not have a defined useful life, it was not considered a tax benefit in this analysis. ▪ CONCLUSION – NORTH AMERICA Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 3D, we conclude a fair value of R$ 1,249,209 thousand, without a defined useful life for the brands of América do Norte. 3

RELIEF FROM ROYALTY 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 MARFRIG TRADEMARK (BRL '000) 26,273,871 25,321,089 24,402,858 23,517,925 22,665,084 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) - CASH FLOW 6,113,784 5,892,077 5,678,410 5,472,491 5,274,039 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) - THIRD PARTY TRADEMARK CASH FLOW 20,160,087 19,429,012 18,724,448 18,045,435 17,391,044 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) - OWN TRADEMARK CASH FLOW 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% Royalty rate (% of NOR) 393,122 378,866 365,127 351,886 339,125 TOTAL ROYALTIES 393,122 378,866 365,127 351,886 339,125 ROYALTIES SAVINGS - PRE TAX 32.4% 32.4% 32.4% 32.4% 32.4% IR and CSLL tax rates 265,679 256,044 246,759 237,811 229,187 ROYALTIES SAVINGS - AFTER TAX 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 4.50 3.50 2.50 1.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.58 0.65 0.74 0.83 0.94 12.9% Discount Rate @ 12.9% 154,105 167,625 182,332 198,328 215,729 Discounted Cash Flow 154,105 Balance to be carried into perpetuity 1,756,498 3.8% Perpetuity @ 3.8% TRADEMARK VALUE 2,674,617 1/2

RELIEF FROM ROYALTY (AN) 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 MARFRIG TRADEMARK (BRL '000) 88,704,183 85,487,461 82,387,388 79,399,735 75,318,782 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) - CASH FLOW 71,401,833 68,812,554 66,317,171 63,912,280 60,627,344 REVENUE – THIRD - PARTY TRADEMARK WITH NO TRADEMARK PREMIUM 17,302,350 16,674,907 16,070,217 15,487,455 14,691,437 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% Royalty rate (% of NOR) 103,814 100,049 96,421 92,925 88,149 TOTAL ROYALTIES 103,814 100,049 96,421 92,925 88,149 ROYALTIES SAVINGS - PRE TAX 26.5% 26.5% 26.5% 26.5% 26.5% IR and CSLL tax rates 76,303 73,536 70,870 68,300 64,789 ROYALTIES SAVINGS - AFTER TAX 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 4.50 3.50 2.50 1.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.67 0.73 0.80 0.88 0.96 Discount Rate @ 9.3% 9.3% 51,210 53,926 56,786 59,798 61,981 Discounted Cash Flow 51,210 Balance to be carried into perpetuity 965,507 Perpetuity @ 3.8% 3.8% TRADEMARK VALUE 1,249,209 2/2

INVENTORY ▪ DESCRIPTION The inventory recorded in MARFRIG's balance sheet on the valuation date of this Report comprises the following classifications : o Raw material; o Finished products; o Products in preparation; o Packaging materials; o Secondary materials; o Warehouse; o Imports in progress; and o Others. ▪ VALUATION METHODOLOGY According to good valuation practices, the value of the inventory must be measured separately between raw materials, products in preparation and finished products . o Raw material − The fair value of the raw material must be evaluated based on the value that a market participant would be able to achieve with the sale of this material in the most advantageous scenario, on the valuation date of the Report, that is, according to the replacement cost . o Finished products − The valuation of finished products must consider the selling price less all expenses related to the disposal of items, such as marketing expenses, commissions, transportation and packaging, as well as a profit margin relative to the degree of risk of these costs . In addition, the time it takes for the company to sell the goods and the time to receive the money must also be considered . o Products in preparation – The fair value of products in preparation must be evaluated in the same way as finished products ; however, the cost of completing the production of the good must also be considered . ▪ VALUATION CRITERIA Below, we detail the assumptions used in the valuation of MARFRIG's inventory on the valuation date of this Report, segmented by type of component classification . o Raw material − Following discussions with the company's management, the book value was considered a proxy for the fair value of the raw material . This material has a high inventory turnover, and there have been no significant variations in its cost, with the historical cost being close to the replacement cost . 1

o Finished products − For the valuation of finished products, the following assumptions were used. The sale value of the finished products was estimated by applying the company's gross margin, on the valuation date of this Report, to the respective book values of the items. The disposal costs applied in the valuation of the finished products were based on the marketing expenses paid by the customers informed in conversations with the company's management. Selling costs were estimated at 3.4%. The profit margin applied to the sales effort was calculated by multiplying the sale value of the inventory by the company's profit margin before income tax (EBIT), on the valuation date of the Report, and the result was subsequently multiplied by the percentage that the disposal cost represents of the company's total costs. For the calculations of the storage cost, which is related to the time between the sale of inventory and the receipt of cash, the number of days of inventory turnover and the company's accounts receivable on the valuation date of the Report was considered, multiplied by the return of pre - tax working capital . ▪ CONCLUSION Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 3F, we conclude a fair value of R$3,432,154 thousand and an indefinite useful life for MARFRIG's inventory. 2

VALUATION OF INVENTORY 31/12/24 VALUATION OF INVENTORY | BRL '000 MARFRIG PREMISES 6.8% Gross Margin 1.3% EBIT margin 3.4% Runoff Cost (% of Revenue) 0.70 Inventory Period (months) 10.0% Cost of Capital (Working Capital) FINISHED PRODUCTS 3,337,479 Book Value 0.2% ( - ) Slow Moving/Obsolete 3,331,482 Adjusted Book Value 3,573,633 Estimated Sale Price 119,751 = TOTAL cost/(1 - Gross MARGIN) ( - ) Runoff Cost 1,638 = Sales x % Disposal Costs ( - ) Profit over Drainage Effort = Sales x EBIT x (% Disposal Cost/% Total Cost) GROSS REALIZABLE VALUE 3,452,243 ( - ) Storage Cost = Gross Value x (Storage Period/12 months) x Cost of Capital 20,089 3,432,154 NET REALIZABLE VALUE 100,673 Capital Gain Before Storage Cost 4% Capital Gain % (before Storage Cost) 1/1

SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS ▪ DESCRIPTION In MARFRIG's operating sector, especially in North America, the relationship with suppliers is mostly contractual, ensuring the requested delivery, both in quantity and quality, of high value - added beef products . In addition, it brings more predictability as to the volume available to be traded in future years and, in this way, it is understood that it is possible to measure the expectation of future economic benefit . Therefore, it has been identified as a relevant intangible asset for this valuation . ▪ VALUATION METHODOLOGY To evaluate the relationship with suppliers, we use the With and Without method , which is based on the income approach to estimate the value of this intangible . This methodology consists of determining the difference in the cash flows generated by the asset, considering the effects of the existence and absence of the contract . Cash flows with the contract are projected considering the valuation of the company under current conditions, while cash flows without the contract consider the following factors: o Loss of volume and, consequently, loss of revenue caused by the absence of the supply contract; and o Loss of margin generated by the increase in additional cost arising from the purchase of cattle heads on the spot market, outside the supply contract. Among the factors analyzed, the probability of renewal of current supply contracts was also taken into account, with a decreasing effect over the projected period. After determining the value attributable to the relationship with suppliers, it is necessary to contemplate the tax impact of the amortization of goodwill related to this asset. The abatement is an economic benefit for the acquirer that reduces its effective expenditure on the acquisition; Therefore, it must be taken into account in the calculation of the value. The present value of the benefit was defined in accordance with current tax guidelines, which require tax amortization according to the useful life of the intangible. Thus, the fair value of the relationship with suppliers is the present value of the difference between the cash flows with and without this asset, multiplied by the probability of renewal and plus the tax benefit of amortization. ▪ VALUATION CRITERIA To estimate the impact of the lack of a relationship with suppliers on the projection of cash flow, the following factors were considered : o Net revenue − As a starting point, we consider the expectation of NOR for the meatpacking operation of América do Norte . In this sense, MARFRIG's management indicated that the purchases of head of cattle under the current supply contracts for the meatpacking operation have a percentage of representativeness over the total of about 80 % . Therefore, to obtain the NOR that is linked to the relationship with suppliers, these and percentage of representativeness were applied to the total NOR of North America . o Loss of revenue – For the scenario without the supply contract, MARFRIG's management estimates that there will be a loss of around 10 % of the volume of cattle for the meatpacking operation, which implies a loss of revenue proportional to the reduced percentage . 1

o Additional Costs − It was considered that the absence of the contract would imply an additional effort for the acquisition of cattle in the spot market, which, according to MARFRIG's management, contributes to a 1% increase in unit cost, reducing the resulting EBIT margin. o Income Tax Deduction – A tax deduction of 26.5% was considered, which takes into account the U.S. income tax rate (21%), plus the Delaware state rate (5.5%), which is levied on income. o Application of the discount rate − Cash flows after tax, after the adjustments described above, were brought to present value by MARFRIG's discount rate for operations in North America. o Probability of renewal − After meetings with the company's management, a probability of non - renewal of 10% p.a. was considered, as informed by MARFRIG, cumulatively. o Useful life − A useful life of 15 years was considered for the relationship with suppliers. o Tax benefit of amortization − We perform the calculation in accordance with the tax guidelines in force in North America, which require tax amortization according to the useful life of the asset. The result was added to the fair value of the relationship with suppliers. ▪ CONCLUSION Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 3H, we concluded the fair value of R$ 4,007,978 thousand and the useful life of 15 years for the relationship with suppliers. 2

SCENARIO 2039 2038 2037 2036 2035 2034 2033 2032 2031 2030 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 'WITH' SCENARIO | BRL '000 MARFRIG 128,339,672 123,685,629 119,200,358 114,877,739 110,711,872 106,697,075 102,827,868 99,098,972 95,505,298 92,041,944 88,704,183 85,487,461 82,387,388 79,399,735 75,318,782 NET OPERATING INCOME (NOR) 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 5.4% 12.5% (% NOR growth) 118,062,091 113,780,749 109,654,663 105,678,203 101,845,944 98,152,656 94,593,299 91,163,017 87,857,129 84,671,124 81,600,655 78,641,531 75,789,716 73,041,317 69,287,171 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) - SLAUGHTER/DEBONING 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% % NOR Total 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 5.4% 94,449,672 91,024,599 87,723,730 84,542,563 81,476,755 78,522,125 75,674,640 72,930,414 70,285,703 67,736,899 65,280,524 62,913,225 60,631,773 58,433,054 55,429,737 RECEITA OPERACIONAL LÍQUIDA (ROL) - ABATE/DESOSSA (CONTRATO) 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% % NOR Total 1,842,645 1,775,825 1,711,427 1,649,365 1,589,553 1,531,910 1,476,358 1,422,820 1,371,224 1,321,498 1,273,576 1,227,392 1,182,882 1,139,987 1,077,870 EBITDA ( + ) 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.9% Ebitda margin (Ebitda/NOR) (1,771,014) (1,706,791) (1,644,897) (1,585,247) (1,527,760) (1,472,358) (1,418,966) (1,367,509) (1,317,918) (1,270,126) (1,224,067) (1,123,968) (1,035,766) (957,468) (810,871) DEPRECIATION / AMORTIZATION ( - ) - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.8% - 1.7% - 1.6% - 1.5% (%NOR) 71,632 69,034 66,531 64,118 61,793 59,552 57,392 55,311 53,305 51,372 49,509 103,424 147,116 182,519 266,999 EBIT ( = ) 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.4% (% NOR) (18,982) (18,294) (17,631) (16,991) (16,375) (15,781) (15,209) (14,657) (14,126) (13,614) (13,120) (27,407) (38,986) (48,368) (70,755) INCOME TAX/SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION ( - ) - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% Effective Corporate Income Tax Rate (CIT/EBIT) 52,649 50,740 48,900 47,127 45,418 43,771 42,183 40,654 39,179 37,759 36,389 76,017 108,131 134,152 196,245 NET OPERATING INCOME / NOPAT ( = ) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% Net margin (LL/NOR) 1,842,645 1,775,825 1,711,427 1,649,365 1,589,553 1,531,910 1,476,358 1,422,820 1,371,224 1,321,498 1,273,576 1,227,392 1,182,882 1,139,987 1,077,870 EBITDA ( + ) (18,982) (18,294) (17,631) (16,991) (16,375) (15,781) (15,209) (14,657) (14,126) (13,614) (13,120) (27,407) (38,986) (48,368) (70,755) INCOME TAX/SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION ( - ) 66,231 63,830 61,515 59,284 57,134 55,062 53,066 51,141 49,287 47,499 45,777 44,117 42,517 55,531 92,171 VARIATION WORKING CAPITAL ( - ) (1,758,961) (1,695,175) (1,633,702) (1,574,458) (1,517,363) (1,462,338) (1,409,309) (1,358,202) (1,308,949) (1,261,482) (1,215,736) (1,027,435) (949,137) (805,496) (768,287) FIXED AND INTANGIBLE INVESTMENTS ( - ) 130,933 126,185 121,609 117,199 112,949 108,853 104,906 101,102 97,435 93,902 90,497 216,666 237,277 341,654 331,000 FREE CASH FLOW "WITH" 2039 2038 2037 2036 2035 2034 2033 2032 2031 2030 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 'WITHOUT' SCENARIO | BRL '000 MARFRIG 128,339,672 123,685,629 119,200,358 114,877,739 110,711,872 106,697,075 102,827,868 99,098,972 95,505,298 92,041,944 88,704,183 85,487,461 82,387,388 79,399,735 75,318,782 ADJUSTED NET OPERATING INCOME 106,255,882 102,402,674 98,689,197 95,110,383 91,661,350 88,337,391 85,133,970 82,046,716 79,071,416 76,204,012 73,440,589 70,777,378 68,210,744 65,737,185 62,358,454 NET OPERATING REVENUE (ROS) - SLAUGHTER/DEBONING 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% % NOR Total 85,004,705 81,922,139 78,951,357 76,088,306 73,329,080 70,669,912 68,107,176 65,637,373 63,257,133 60,963,209 58,752,471 56,621,903 54,568,595 52,589,748 49,886,763 NET OPERATING REVENUE (LIST) - SLAUGHTER/DEBONING (CONTRACT) 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% % NOR Total 1,658,381 1,598,242 1,540,284 1,484,428 1,430,598 1,378,719 1,328,722 1,280,538 1,234,101 1,189,349 1,146,219 1,104,653 1,064,594 1,025,988 970,083 EBITDA ( + ) 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.9% Ebitda margin (Ebitda/NOR) Basis – Additional Costs (98,075,393) (101,765,774) (105,595,016) (109,568,345) (113,691,183) (117,969,155) (122,408,098) (94,518,838) (91,091,256) (87,787,970) (84,604,473) (81,536,421) (78,579,627) (75,730,056) (71,837,715) NB Costs – FLOW (R$ thousand) 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,011,112 NB Volume – FLOW (000) Tons 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 45 43 41 40 38 37 36 Unit Costs – FLOW (R$ thousand / (000) Tons) 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% Unit Costs – FLOW (R$ thousand / (000) Tons) 0.60 0.58 0.56 0.54 0.52 0.50 0.48 0.46 0.45 0.43 0.41 0.40 0.38 0.37 0.36 Additional Cost for loss of contract (R$ thousand / (000) Tons) 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,332,043 Volume Contract 1,013,450 976,699 941,280 907,146 874,250 842,546 811,993 782,547 754,169 726,820 700,463 675,062 650,582 626,990 475,811 Additional Costs 644,931 621,544 599,004 577,282 556,348 536,173 516,729 497,991 479,932 462,528 445,755 429,591 414,012 398,999 494,272 ADJUSTED EBITDA ( + ) 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.8% Ebitda margin (Ebitda/NOR) (1,593,912) (1,536,112) (1,480,407) (1,426,722) (1,374,984) (1,325,123) (1,277,069) (1,230,758) (1,186,127) (1,143,113) (1,101,660) (1,011,571) (932,189) (861,721) (729,784) ADJUSTED DEPRECIATION ( - ) - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.8% - 1.7% - 1.6% - 1.5% (%NOR) (948,981) (914,568) (881,403) (849,440) (818,636) (788,950) (760,340) (732,767) (706,194) (680,585) (655,905) (581,981) (518,177) (462,722) (235,512) EBIT AJUSTADO ( = ) - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.6% - 0.6% - 0.3% (% NOR) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME TAX/CONTRIB. SOCIAL ADJUSTED ( - ) - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% Effective Corporate Income Tax Rate (CIT/EBIT) (948,981) (914,568) (881,403) (849,440) (818,636) (788,950) (760,340) (732,767) (706,194) (680,585) (655,905) (581,981) (518,177) (462,722) (235,512) ADJUSTED OPERATING NET INCOME / NOPAT ( = ) - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.6% - 0.6% - 0.3% Net margin (LL/NOR) 1/2

SCENARIO 2039 2038 2037 2036 2035 2034 2033 2032 2031 2030 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 'WITH' SCENARIO | BRL '000 MARFRIG 644,931 621,544 599,004 577,282 556,348 536,173 516,729 497,991 479,932 462,528 445,755 429,591 414,012 398,999 494,272 ADJUSTED EBITDA ( + ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME TAX/CONTRIB. SOCIAL ADJUSTED ( - ) 59,608 57,447 55,363 53,356 51,421 49,556 47,759 46,027 44,358 42,749 41,199 39,705 38,265 49,978 82,954 VARIATION ADJUSTED WORKING CAPITAL ( - ) (1,583,065) (1,525,657) (1,470,332) (1,417,012) (1,365,627) (1,316,104) (1,268,378) (1,222,382) (1,178,054) (1,135,334) (1,094,163) (924,692) (854,223) (724,947) (691,458) FIXED AND INTANGIBLE INVESTMENTS ADJUSTED ( - ) (878,525) (846,667) (815,964) (786,374) (757,858) (730,375) (703,889) (678,364) (653,764) (630,056) (607,208) (455,396) (401,946) (275,970) (114,232) FREE CASH FLOW "WITHOUT" 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 14.50 13.50 12.50 11.50 10.50 9.50 8.50 7.50 6.50 5.50 4.50 3.50 2.50 1.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.28 0.30 0.33 0.36 0.39 0.43 0.47 0.51 0.56 0.61 0.67 0.73 0.80 0.88 0.96 Discount Factor @ 9.3% 36,224 38,145 40,169 42,299 44,543 46,905 49,393 52,013 54,772 57,677 60,736 158,887 190,125 299,128 316,654 NPV | FREE CASH FLOW "WITH" (243,054) (255,945) (269,520) (283,816) (298,869) (314,721) (331,414) (348,992) (367,502) (386,994) (407,520) (333,954) (322,071) (241,619) (109,281) NPV | FREE CASH FLOW "WITHOUT" 279,278 294,091 309,689 326,115 343,412 361,626 380,807 401,004 422,274 444,671 468,256 492,841 512,196 540,748 425,935 NPV | DIFERENTIAL FLOW "WITH/WITHOUT" 21% 23% 25% 28% 31% 35% 39% 43% 48% 53% 59% 66% 73% 81% 90% % PROBABILITY OF CONTRACT RENEWAL 22.9% 25.4% 28.2% 31.4% 34.9% 38.7% 43.0% 47.8% 53.1% 59.0% 65.6% 72.9% 81.0% 90.0% 100.0% Beginning of Period 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% Probability Contract Cancellation 20.6% 22.9% 25.4% 28.2% 31.4% 34.9% 38.7% 43.0% 47.8% 53.1% 59.0% 65.6% 72.9% 81.0% 90.0% End of Period 57,501 67,278 78,719 92,104 107,766 126,091 147,532 172,619 201,972 236,316 276,500 323,353 373,391 438,006 383,341 ADJUSTED NPV | DIFFERENTIAL FLOW "WITH/WITHOUT" 3,420,627 CASH FLOW VARIANCE WITH AND WITHOUT 3,420,627 VALUE OF INTANGIBLE | PRE - TAB 15.0 anos Intangible Asset Useful Life 587,351 TAX BENEFIT RESULTING FROM AMORTIZATION 4,007,978 VALUE OF INTANGIBLE | POST - TAB 673,338 VALUE OF INTANGIBLE | POST - TAB (USD thousands) 2/2

CONTINGENCIES APPRAISED MARFRIG CONTINGENCIES (BRL '000) 11,638,168 Capital gain of total contigencies Face value 12.3% Equivalent Probability 1,432,674 Capital gain 1,432,674 Total capital gain (BRL '000) 1/1

ATTACHMENT 4

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FIXED ASSETS The values below consider the valuation date of December 31 st , 2024 and are based on the fact that there are no impediments to the objects, whether debts, registrations without legal challenges, construction or tax irregularities (including deferred liabilities), environmental liabilities, among other obstacles: Company: Marfrig Valuation date: 31/12/2024 1 CAPITAL GAIN FAIR VALUE REPRODUCTION VALUE NET BOOK VALUE RUL ACCOUNTING BALANCE 88,180,915.05 R$ 671,893,442.87 R$ 1,002,804,791.31 R$ 583,712,527.82 R$ 10 Others 465,299,966.50 R$ 4,317,010,891.98 R$ 5,006,944,049.01 R$ 3,851,710,925.48 R$ 52 Land, buildings and improvements 1,224,256,003.93 R$ 4,599,195,366.60 R$ 6,750,962,737.66 R$ 3,374,939,362.67 R$ 10 Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures 126,338,090.97 - R$ 121,822,771.01 R$ 124,747,104.88 R$ 248,160,861.98 R$ 47 Buildings and structures 832,423.30 R$ 8,671,011.02 R$ 16,419,059.34 R$ 7,838,587.72 R$ 3 IT equipment 56,807,806.85 - R$ 49,987,230.80 R$ 50,024,728.29 R$ 106,795,037.66 R$ 6 Improvements 133,999,383.89 R$ 318,602,546.78 R$ 322,250,208.89 R$ 184,603,162.89 R$ 4 Machinery and equipment 2,492,811.96 - R$ 2,697,073.34 R$ 2,805,565.01 R$ 5,189,885.30 R$ 6 Furniture and fixtures 3,129,043.75 R$ 4,122,966.05 R$ 4,224,721.51 R$ 993,922.30 R$ 1 Vehicles 37,646,250.62 - R$ 47,699,762.04 R$ 47,699,762.04 R$ 85,346,012.66 R$ N/A Land - R$ 1,446,324,594.33 R$ 1,488,722,282.76 R$ 1,446,324,594.33 R$ N/A Construction in progress 1,692,412,776.03 R$ 11,588,027,656.84 R$ 14,817,605,010.70 R$ 9,895,614,880.81 R$ 28 Total

2. INTRODUCTION In the preparation of this work, data and information provided by third parties were used, in the form of documents and verbal interviews with the client. The estimates used in this process are based on: 2 ▪ Analytical fixed assets of all group companies for 31/12/2024; ▪ Listing of owned and leased units; ▪ Vehicle listing; ▪ Appraisal reports prepared by third parties from the following units: o Marfrig (Brazil) Planta Promissão 1; Planta Promissão 2; Planta Varzea Grande. o Pampeano (Brasil) Planta Pampeano. o Tacuarembo (Uruguay) Frigorifico Tacuarembo S.A.; Cledinor S.A.; Establecimientos colonia S.A.; Inaler S.A.; o National Beef (United States of America) Dodge; Liberal; Hummels; Moultrie; St. Joe; KC Corporate; National Carries; Tama; Ohio. o MFG Holdings (Argentina) Planta Pilar; Planta Baradero; Planta Arroyo Seco; Planta San Jorge; Planta Estancias del Sur .

3. KEY STEPSS Analysis of documentation provided by management Discussions with the client to understand the documentation provided And sent of the report for independent internal review Implementation of any suggested improvements and changes Issuance of final report

4. CAVEATS AND PREMISES 1. CAVEATS During the performance of the work, some limitations and specific premises were adopted, as described below: 1. Simplified Methodology : The valuation was conducted based on a simplified methodology, according to objectives previously defined with the client. 2. Absence of Market Quotation : Market quotations were not made for all the items valuated. As a result, parameters and reference bases available internally or provided by third parties were used, 3. Failure to Reach the Percentage of 80% Quoted: The survey did not reach the minimum percentage of 80% of the items with values obtained through direct quotations or reliable external sources. 4. Absence of Physical Inspections : No physical inspections were carried out for the on - site verification of assets. Thus, the physical, functional and operational conditions of the assets were considered based on information provided by the company and/or third parties, without direct validation by the technical team responsible for the valuation. 5. Use of Third - Party Valuations: In this work, values and information from valuations carried out by third parties were considered. The veracity, accuracy and timeliness of these data were assumed to be correct, and were not subject to verification by the team responsible for this report.

2. ASSUMPTIONS The following assumptions were adopted for the valuation of each accounting class: 1. Equipment, tools, installations and others The mobile assets acquired between 2022 and 2024 were revalued using market indices published monthly by FGV for entries made in BRL and the Consumer Price Indexes (CPI) corresponding to entries made in other currencies. The selection of the indices took into account the asset category and its cost variation in the period valuated, ensuring the adherence of the values to the market. 2. Buildings and improvements For real estate, the INCC was applied as a factor for updating the original costs for the entries made in BRL and the Consumer Price Indexes (CPI) corresponding to the entries made in other currencies. This index reflects variations in construction costs and ensures the compatibility of the updated values with market conditions. 3. Land All land was held at the client's historical cost, since there is no specific index applicable for updating this type of asset. In the case of the valuations carried out for the land, the values calculated in each valuation were preserved. 4. Other entries In the case of assets older than three years that were not valuated by third parties, as well as works in progress, the book residual value was used as an approximation of the fair value, given the absence of specific valuations and the limitation of data. Assets registered with a symbolic value of R$ 0.01, usually corresponding to physical leftovers or residual components, were treated according to general procedures. Due to deadline restrictions, individual quotation of these items was not carried out.

5. VALUATION METHODOLOGY The methodology applied followed established technical procedures to ensure the proper measurement of the assets, as detailed below. 1. COST REPRODUCTION HISTORICAL COST METHOD When the value of the asset is determined from the monetary adjustment of its acquisition cost, the historical cost method is adopted, with the calculation of accounting records and the application of specific indexes, generally used by competent official bodies. The valuation of MARFRIG's assets followed technical and methodological guidelines in line with the best market practices, considering the nature and specificities of the assets valuated. The main assumptions adopted were: ▪ Valuation criteria: The historical cost method was adopted, based on the update of the valuations carried out by third parties for the units of each controlled company. The updated values were prorated by unit and/or accounting class. For the other assets, the accounting costs incurred between 2022 and 2024 were updated through specific indexes. ▪ Update indexes: For the launches incurred in BRL, market indexes released monthly by Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) were used for each type of asset. In the case of real estate, the National Construction Cost Index (INCC) was used. For the others, the Consumer Price Indexes (CPI) of each currency released by the Central Bank of the respective countries were considered.

5.2. DEPRECIATION OF ASSETS Straight - line depreciation The calculation of asset depreciation was carried out using the straight - line depreciation method, which assumes that the wear and tear of the asset operates in a linear manner over time, decreasing the value of the asset by a fixed amount each period, until the net value reaches zero. This model provides the present value, depreciated, relative to the age "x" of the improvement at the time of appraisal, through the formula below. ܖ ( ܖ — ܠ ) ۹ ܌ = ۾ ܌ + ۾ ܚ Being: Kd = depreciation coefficient; Pd = depreciable portion, in decimal form; Pr = residual portion, in decimal form; n = service life; x = apparent age. 1. Asset age or operating age (x) The assets that were valuated through third - party reports had their fair values updated and the appropriate relative depreciation applied considering the base date of the previous report and the valuation date of this work . For the other items not covered by this valuation, the age of the assets was based on the date of acquisition contained in the fixed asset analytical file sent by the company's management . 2. Estimated service life (n) According to primary concepts of mechanical design, every machine is formed by the composition of elements whose set, at the beginning of its operational life, obeys a law of decrease in its work capacity, which is generically represented by three cycles, described below . ▪ Break - in: adjustment cycle with loss of material, commonly followed by an improvement in the operation of the assembly. ▪ Operation : cycle in which the machine is at its normal production capacity and the loss of material in wear is slow and negligible. However, over the course of time called "operational useful life", the set loses its performance to the point where it must undergo partial or total reconditioning, before an irreversible collapse.

▪ Collapse: in this cycle, the removal of the material that occurred in the operation phase culminates in the collapse, making the machine unrecoverable, and only what is called "residual state or value" remains. 5.2.3. Residual value (Pr) The residual value is related to the operational useful life of the asset, representing the portion of the value that will not be depreciated at the end of this useful life, as indicated in the following table, by asset class: RV EUL ACCOUNTING BALANCE 5% 13 Others 5% 60 Land, buildings and improvements 5% 14 Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures 5% 60 Buildings and structures 2% 5 IT equipment 5% 10 Improvements 5% 14 Machinery and equipment 2% 13 Furniture and fixtures 5% 5 Vehicles N/A N/A Construction in progress N/A N/A Land

6. RESULTS In accordance with the technical procedures applied and after carrying out the necessary due diligence, the appraisers determined the following fair values: CAPITAL GAIN FAIR VALUE REPRODUCTION VALUE NET BOOK VALUE RUL ACCOUNTING BALANCE 88,180,915.05 R$ 671,893,442.87 R$ 1,002,804,791.31 R$ 583,712,527.82 R$ 10 Others 465,299,966.50 R$ 4,317,010,891.98 R$ 5,006,944,049.01 R$ 3,851,710,925.48 R$ 52 Land, buildings and improvements 1,224,256,003.93 R$ 4,599,195,366.60 R$ 6,750,962,737.66 R$ 3,374,939,362.67 R$ 10 Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures 126,338,090.97 - R$ 121,822,771.01 R$ 124,747,104.88 R$ 248,160,861.98 R$ 47 Buildings and structures 832,423.30 R$ 8,671,011.02 R$ 16,419,059.34 R$ 7,838,587.72 R$ 3 IT equipment 56,807,806.85 - R$ 49,987,230.80 R$ 50,024,728.29 R$ 106,795,037.66 R$ 6 Improvements 133,999,383.89 R$ 318,602,546.78 R$ 322,250,208.89 R$ 184,603,162.89 R$ 4 Machinery and equipment 2,492,811.96 - R$ 2,697,073.34 R$ 2,805,565.01 R$ 5,189,885.30 R$ 6 Furniture and fixtures 3,129,043.75 R$ 4,122,966.05 R$ 4,224,721.51 R$ 993,922.30 R$ 1 Vehicles 37,646,250.62 - R$ 47,699,762.04 R$ 47,699,762.04 R$ 85,346,012.66 R$ N/A Land - R$ 1,446,324,594.33 R$ 1,488,722,282.76 R$ 1,446,324,594.33 R$ N/A Construction in progress 1,692,412,776.03 R$ 11,588,027,656.84 R$ 14,817,605,010.70 R$ 9,895,614,880.81 R$ 28 Total Company: Marfrig Valuation date: 31/12/2024

ATTACHMENT 5

A ABL Gross Leasable Area. ABNT (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas) Brazilian Technical Standards Association. Allocated Codes Serial number (grades or weights) to differentiate the quality features of properties. Allotment Subdivision of a tract of land into lots for buildings with the opening of new thoroughfares, or the extension, modification or expansion of existing ones. Amortization Systematic allocation of the depreciable value of an asset over its useful life. Apparent Age Estimated age of a property according to its characteristics and conservation status at the time of inspection. Asset A resource controlled by the entity as a result of past events from which future economic benefits are expected for the entity. Asset Approach Valuation of companies where all assets (including those not accounted for) have their values adjusted to the market. Also known as 1 market net equity. BDI (Budget Difference Income) A percentage that indicates the benefits and overhead costs applied to the direct cost of construction. Best Use of the Property The most economically appropriate use of a certain property according to its characteristics and surroundings, respecting legal limitations. Beta A systematic risk measure of a share ; price trend of a particular share to be correlated with changes in a given index . Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) The BOMA Standard measures buildings on a buildingwide basis . It introduces the concept of Building Common Area (areas common to all of the tenants in a building) . Building Standard The quality of the improvements according to the specifications of design, materials, workmanship and performance effectively used in construction. Book Value The value at which an asset or liability is recognized on the balance sheet. Business Combination Union of separate entities or businesses producing financial statements of a single reporting entity. Transaction or other event by which an acquirer obtains control of one or more businesses, regardless of the legal form of operation. Business Risk Uncertainty of realization of expected future returns of the business resulting from factors other than financial leverage. GLOSSARY B Basic Infrastructure Urban rainwater drainage equipment, street lighting, sewage system, drinking water, public and home electricity supply and access routes. C CAPEX (Capital Expenditure) Fixed asset investments. CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing Model) Model in which the capital cost for any share or lot of shares equals the risk free rate plus risk premium provided by the systematic risk of the share or lot of shares under investigation. Generally used to calculate the Cost of Equity or the Cost of Shareholder Capital. Capital Structure Composition of a company’s invested capital, between own capital (equity) and third - party capital (debt) . Cash Flow Cash generated by an asset, group of assets or business during a given period of time. Usually the term is supplemented by a qualification referring to the context (operating, nonoperating, etc.) Cash Flow on Invested Capital Cash flow generated by the company to be reverted to lenders (interest and amortizations) and shareholders (dividends) after consideration of cost and operating expenses and capital investments. Cash - Generating Unit Smallest identifiable group of assets generating cash inflows that are largely independent on inputs generated by other assets or groups of assets. Casualty An event that causes financial loss. CFC (Conselho Federal de Contabilidade) Brazilian Accounting Committee. Company Commercial or industrial entity, service provider or investment entity holding economic activities. Conservation Status Physical status of an asset as a result of its maintenance. Control Power to direct the strategic policy and administrative management of a company. Control Premium Value or percentage of the pro - rata value of a lot of controlling shares over the pro - rata value of noncontrolling shares, which reflect the control power . Cost The total direct and indirect costs necessary for production, maintenance or acquisition of an asset at a particular time and situation. Cost of Capital Expected rate of return required by the market as an attraction to certain investment funds.

CPC (Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis) Accounting Pronouncements Committee. Current Value Value replacement with a new value depreciated as a result of the physical state the property is in. CVM Securities and Exchange Commission. EBITDA (Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Economic Benefits Benefits such as revenue, net profit, net cash flow, etc. Efficient Use That which is recommendable and technically possible for the location on a reference date, among the various uses permitted by the applicable law, observing surrounding marketing trends. Electrical Damage Value Estimated cost of the repair or replacement of parts, when the property suffers electrical damage. Values are tabulated in percentages of the Replacement Value and have been calculated through the study of equipment manuals and the expertise in corrective maintenance of Apsis technicians. Fair Value Less Cost to Sell Value that can be obtained from the sale of an asset or cash - generating unit less sale expenses, in a transaction between knowledgeable, willing and uninterested parties. E EBIT (Earnings before Interest and Taxes) Earnings before interest and taxes. F Facilities Set of materials, systems, networks, equipment and operational support services for a single machine, production line or plant, according to the degree of aggregation. Fair Market Value Value at which an asset could have its ownership exchanged between a potential seller and a potential buyer, when both parties have reasonable knowledge of relevant facts and neither is under pressure to do so. Enterprise Set of properties capable of producing revenue through marketing or economic exploitation. It can be: real estate (e.g. subdivision, commercial/ residential buildings), real - estate based (e.g., hotel, shopping mall, theme parks), industrial or rural. Enterprise Value Economic value of the company. Equity Value Economic value of the equity. Equivalent Construction Area Constructed area on which the unit cost equivalence of corresponding construction is applied, according to ABNT postulates. Equivalent Depth Numerical result of the division of a lot area by its main projected front. Expertise Technical activity performed by a professional with specific expertise to investigate and clarify facts, check the status of property, investigate the causes that motivated a particular event, appraise assets, their costs, results or rights. Dichotomous Variable Variable that assumes only two values. Direct Production Cost Spending on inputs, including labor, in the production of goods. Discount Rate Any divisor used to convert a flow of future economic benefits into present value. Financial Lease That which substantially transfers all the risks and benefits related to the ownership of the asset, which may or may not eventually be transferred. Leases that are not financial leases are classified as operating leases. Fixed Asset Tangible asset available for use in the production or supply of goods or services, in third - party leasing, investments, or for management purposes, expected to be used for more than one accounting period. Forced Liquidation Conditiononthepossibility ofacompulsorysaleorinashorter period than theaverageabsorptionbythemarket. G Goodwill See Premium for Expected Future Profitability. H Homogenization Treatment of observed prices by application of mathematical transformations that express, in relative terms, the differences between market data attributes and those of the property assessed. FCFF (Free Cash Flow to Firm) Free cash flow to firm, or unlevered free cash flow. D Data Treatment Application of operations to express, in relative terms, the attribute differences between the market data and data of the property being assessed. Date of Issue Closing date of the valuation report, when conclusions are conveyed to the client. DCF (Discounted Cash Flow) Discounted cash flow. D&A Depreciation and amortization. Dependent Variable Variable to be explained by the independent ones. Depreciable Value Cost of the asset, or other amount that substitutes such cost (financial statements), less its residual value. Depreciation Systematic allocation of the depreciable value of an asset during its useful life. 2

I IAS (International Accounting Standards) Principles - based standards, interpretations and the framework adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). See International Accounting Standards. IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) International Accounting Standards Board. Standard setting body responsible for the development of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). Ideal Fraction Percentage owned by each of the buyers (tenants) of the land IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) International Financial Reporting Standards, a set of international accounting pronouncements published and reviewed by the IASB. IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) International Financial Reporting Standards, a set of international accounting pronouncements published and reviewed by the IASB. Impairment See Impairment losses. Impairment Losses (impairment) Book value of the asset that exceeds, in the case of stocks, its selling price less the cost to complete it and expense of selling it; or, in the case of other assets, their fair value less expenditure for sale. Income Approach Valuation method for converting the present value of expected economic benefits. Independent Variables Variables that provide a logical content to the formation of the value of the property subject to the assessment. Indirect Production Cost Administrative and financial costs, benefits and other liens and charges necessary for the production of goods. Insurance Risk transfer guaranteed by contract whereby one party undertakes, subject to payment of premium, to indemnify another for the occurrence of casualties covered under the policy. Insurance Value Value at which an insurance company assumes the risks. Except in special cases, it is not applied to land and foundations. Intangible Asset Identifiable non - monetary asset without physical substance. This asset is identifiable when: a) it is separable, i.e., capable of being separated or divided from the entity and sold, transferred, licensed, leased or exchanged, either alone or together with the related contract, asset or liability; b) it arises from contractual or other legal rights, regardless of whether those rights are transferable or separable from the entity or from other rights and obligations. Internal Rate of Return Discount rate where the present value of future cash flow is equivalent to the cost of investment. International Accounting Standards (IAS) Standards and interpretations adopted by the IASB. They include: International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) International Accounting Standards (IAS) and interpretations developed by the Interpretation Committee on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRIC) or by the former Standing Interpretations Committee (SIC). Investment Property Property (land, building or building part, or both) held by the owner or lessee under the lease, both to receive payment of rent and for capital appreciation or both, other than for use in the production or supply of goods or services, as well as for administrative purposes. Investment Value Value for a particular investor based on individual interests in the property in question. In the case of business valuation, this value can be analyzed by different situations, such as the synergy with other companies of an investor, risk perceptions, future performance and tax planning. IVSC International Valuation Standards Council. Key Variables Variables that, a priori, and traditionally have been important for the formation of property value . K Key Money Amount paid by the prospective tenant for signature or transfer of the lease contract, as compensation for the point of sale. L Levered Beta Beta value reflecting the debt in capital structure. Liability Present obligation that arises from past events, whereby it is hoped that the settlement thereof will result in the inflow of funds from the entity embodying economic benefits. Liquidity Ability to rapidly convert certain assets into cash or into the payment of a certain debt. M Market Approach Valuation method in which multiple comparisons derived from the sales price of similar assets are adopted. 3 Market Data Set of information collected on the market related to a particular property. Market Research Set of activities for identification, investigation, collection, selection, processing, analysis and interpretation of results on market data. Homogenization Area Useful or private area, or built with mathematical treatments for valuation purposes, according to criteria based on the real estate market.

Maximum Insurance Value Maximum value of the property for which it is recommendable to insure it. This criterion establishes that the property whose depreciation is greater than 50% should have its Maximum Insurance Value equivalent to twice as much as the Current Value; and the property whose depreciation is with less than 50% should have its Maximum Insurance Value equivalent to the Replacement Value. Multiple Market value of a company, share or invested capital, divided by a valuation measurement of the company (EBITDA, income, customer volume, etc.). N Net Debt Cash and cash equivalents, net position in derivatives, short - term and long - term financial debts, dividends receivable and payable, receivables and payables related to debentures, short - term and long - term deficits with pension funds, provisions, and other credits and obligations to related parties, including subscription bonus. Non - Operating Assets Those not directly related to the company’s operations (may or may not generate revenue) and that can be disposed of without detriment to its business. O Operating Assets Assets that are basic to the company’s operations. Operating Lease That which does not substantially transfer all the risks and benefits incidental to the ownership of the asset. Leases that are not operating leases are classified as financial leases. P Parent Company An entity that has one or more subsidiaries. Percentual Value Value at the end of the projective period to be added on the cash flow. Point of Sale Intangible asset that adds value to commercial property, due to its location and expected commercial exploitation. Population Total market data of the segment to be analyzed. Premium for Expected Future Profitability (goodwill) Future economic benefits arising from assets not capable of being individually identified or separately recognized. Present Value The estimated present value of discounted net cash flows in the normal course of business. Price The amount by which a transaction is performed involving a property, a product or the right thereto. Private Area Useful area plus building blocks (such as walls, pillars, etc.) and elevator hallway (in specific cases). Property Something of value, subject to use, or that may be the object of a right, which integrates an equity. Q Qualitative Variables Variables that cannot be measured or counted, only ordered or ranked, according to attributes inherent to the property (e.g., building standard, conservation status and quality of the soil). Quantitative Variables Variables that can be measured or counted (e.g., private area, number of bedrooms and parking spaces). R Range for Real Estate Valuations Range in the vicinity of the point estimator adopted in the valuation within which to arbitrate the value of the property, provided it is justified by the existence of features that are not contemplated in the model . 4 Re (Cost of Equity) Return required by shareholders for the capital invested. Real Estate Property, consisting of land and any improvements incorporated thereto. Can be classified as urban or rural, depending on its location, use or to its highest and best use. Recoverable Value The highest fair value of an asset (or cashgenerating unit) minus the cost of sales compared with its value in use. Reference Real Estate Market data with features comparable to the property assessed. Regression Model The model used to represent a specific phenomenon, based on a sample, considering the various influencing characteristics. Remaining Life A property’s remaining life. Replacement Cost A property’s reproduction cost less depreciation, with the same function and features comparable to the property assessed. Replacement Value for New Value based on what the property would cost (usually in relation to current market prices) to be replaced with or substituted by a new, equal or similar property . Marketing Factor The ratio between the market value of an asset and its reproduction cost less depreciation or replacement cost, which may be higher or lower than 1 (one). Rd (Cost of Debt) A measure of the amount paid for the capital earned from third parties, in the form of loans, financing, market funding, among others.

S Sample Set of market data representative of a population. Scrap Value Market value of a property’s reusable materials in disabling conditions, without their being used for production purposes. Shareholders’ Equity at Market Prices See Assets Approach. Statistical Inference Part of statistical science that allows drawing conclusions about the population from a sample. Subsidiary Entity, including that with no legal character, such as an association, controlled by another entity (known as the parent company) . Supporting Documentation Documentation raised and provided by the client on which the report premises are based. Survey Evidence of local events through insightful observations in a property and of the factors and conditions that constitute or influence it. T Tangible Asset Physically existing asset, such as land, building, machinery, equipment, furniture and tools. Technical Report Detailed report or technical clarification issued by a legally qualified and trained professional on a specific subject. Technical Term of Responsibility Required document, which defines the responsible engineer for a product or service. Total Construction Area Resulting from the sum of the real private area and the common area allocated to an independent unit, defined according to ABNT. U Urbanizable Land Land eligible to receive urban infrastructure works aiming at its efficient use, by means of the subdivision, split or implementation of a business . Useful Area Real private area subtracted from the area occupied by walls and other building blocks that prevent or hinder its use. Useful Economic Life The period in which an asset is expected to be available for use, or the number of production or similar units expected to be obtained from the asset by the entity. V Valuation Act or process of determining the value of an asset. Valuation Date Specific date (day, month and year) of application of the assessment value. Valuation Methodology One or more approaches used in developing evaluative calculations for the indication of the value of an asset. Representative value of the share of the property one wishes to insure and that may correspond to the maximum insurable value. Value at Risk Value in Use Value of a property in operating conditions in its present state, such as the useful part of an industry, including, where relevant, the costs of design, packaging, taxes, freight and installation. Value of a business in forced liquidation Value of a property offered for sale on the market outside the normal process, i.e. one that would be established if the property were offered for sale separately, taking into account the costs involved and the discount required for a sale in a reduced period. Value of a business in immediate liquidation The compulsory liquidation refers to a business forced into liquidation by way of a winding - up petition presented to the court. More aggressive than forced liquidation. Value Plan The graphic representation or listing of generic square meter values of land or of the real estate on the same date. W WACC WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital) Model in which capital cost is determined by the weighted average of the market value of capital structure components (own and others). WARA Weighted Average Return on Assets (WARA) Weighted average rate of return expected for the assets and liabilities that make up the company under analysis, including goodwill. 5 Residual Value of an Asset Estimated value that the entity would obtain at present with the sale of the asset, after deducting the estimated costs thereof, if the asset were already at the expected age and condition at the end of its useful life. Residual Value Value of new or used asset projected for a date limited to that in which it becomes scrap, considering its being in operation during the period. Reproduction Cost Expense required for the exact duplication of a property, regardless of any depreciation. Reproduction Cost Less Depreciation A property’s reproduction cost less depreciation, considering the state it is in.

Rio de Janeiro +55 21 2212 - 6850 apsis.rj@apsis.com.br São Paulo 55 11 4550 - 2701 apsis.sp@apsis.com.br Minas Gerais +55 31 98299 - 6678 apsis.mg@apsis.com.br apsis.com.br 1

Exhibit 99.2

This business combination involves the securities of a Brazilian company. The business combination is subject to disclosure requirements of Brazil that are different from those of the United States. Financial statements included in the document, if any, have been prepared in accordance with foreign accounting standards that may not be comparable to financial statements of United States companies.

It may be difficult for you to enforce your rights and any claim you may have arising under the U.S. federal securities laws, since the issuer is located in Brazil, and some or all of its officers and directors may be residents of Brazil. You may not be able to sue a Brazilian company or its officers or directors in a Brazilian court for violations of the U.S. securities laws. It may be difficult to compel a Brazilian company and its affiliates to subject themselves to a U.S. court’s judgment.

You should be aware that the issuer may purchase securities otherwise than under the exchange offer, such as in open market or privately negotiated purchases.

*      *      *

BRF S.A.

Publicly-held company

CNPJ 01.838.723/0001-27

NIRE 42.300.034.240

AMENDED AND RESTATED SHAREHOLDERS’ MANUAL FOR PARTICIPATION IN
THE EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING

JUNE 18, 2025

INDEX

1 - MESSAGE FROM MANAGEMENT

Dear Shareholders,

BRF S.A. (“BRF” or “Company”) is a company whose shares grant equal rights to their holders and which offers equal protection mechanisms to its shareholders.

Our shares are listed on the Novo Mercado of B3 SA – Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão (“B3”) and on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), with level III ADRs.

In line with the high level of corporate governance policy adopted by the Company, and within the principles of transparency, homogeneity and equity defined for our relationship with our investors, we invite Shareholders to participate in the Extraordinary General Meeting (“EGM”) called for June 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. hours, to be carried out exclusively digitally, through the Zoom digital platform (“Digital Platform”).

Reinforcing our concern with the information provided, we have made available on the Investor Relations website (http://ri.brf-global.com, under Corporate Governance) and on the websites of the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission – CVM (www.gov.br/cvm) and B3 (www.b3.com.br), all legally required documents and others that we deem necessary to support the understanding and taking by shareholders of the decisions that will be subject to deliberation at this EGM, as well as this Manual.

We will have the following matters for deliberation:

We look forward to your participation in our EGM, as it will address issues relevant to the Company.

We understand that the information provided herein allows our shareholders to provide an early position and facilitates decision-making. Our Investor Relations team is prepared and available to answer any questions or provide guidance.

Counting on your presence, we take this opportunity to express our consideration and appreciation.

Cordially,

Marcos Antonio Molina dos Santos

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Miguel de Souza Gularte

Global CEO

Fabio Luis Mendes Mariano

Vice President of Finance and Investor Relations Publicly Held Company with Authorized Capital

2 – CALL NOTICE

BRF S.A.

CNPJ 01.838.723/0001-27

NIRE 42.300.034.240

CALL NOTICE

EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING

The shareholders of BRF S.A. (“BRF” or “Company”) are invited to attend the Extraordinary General Meeting to be held on June 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. (“EGM”), exclusively digitally, through the Zoom digital platform (“Zoom Platform”), to deliberate on the following Agenda:

*      *      *

INFORMATION FOR PARTICIPATION

Participation in the digital meeting

Shareholders

The EGM will be held exclusively digitally, in accordance with article 124, §2º-A, of the Brazilian Corporations Law and CVM Resolution No. 81/2022.

As provided for in article 5, §4, of CVM Resolution No. 81/2022, the Company understands that it is more appropriate to hold the Meeting now convened exclusively digitally, since this format allows for greater participation by shareholders, as it enables the presence of shareholders from any location in Brazil and abroad, as well as reducing costs both for shareholder participation and for holding the conclave.

The Company emphasizes that it will not be possible to physically attend the EGM, as it will be held exclusively digitally.

As provided for in article 6, §3, of CVM Resolution No. 81/2022, shareholders who intend to participate in the EGM, in person or through proxies, must submit, by 9:00 AM on June 16, 2025, the date 2 (two) days prior to the EGM, exclusively through the Qi Central platform (“Qi Central Platform”) (https://qicentral.com.br/m/age-brf-2025-06), a request for access to the EGM (“Access Request”).

The Access Request must contain the identification of the shareholder and, if applicable, of his/her attorney who will participate in the EGM, and the scanned copies of the following documents:

Individual Shareholders:

Legal Entity Shareholders:

Shareholders Represented by Proxy:

Foreign Shareholders:

Foreign shareholders must present the same documentation as Brazilian shareholders, except that the corporate documents of the legal entity and the power of attorney must be translated in sworn form, and do not require notarization or consularization.

The Company will send to shareholders (or their duly appointed representatives or attorneys) who have submitted their Access Request within the period and under the conditions described above, by email, individual invitations to access the Zoom Platform and the respective instructions for accessing the electronic system for participation in the EGM, including the password required for this purpose.

Shareholders who do not submit the Access Request within the aforementioned deadline (until 9:00 AM on June 16, 2025) will not be able to participate in the EGM.

For additional information on participation in the EGM and access to the Zoom Platform, shareholders should consult the EGM Participation Manual.

Holders of American Depositary Receipts – ADRs:

Holders of ADRs will be represented at the EGM by The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary institution, pursuant to the “Deposit Agreement ” entered into with the Company. ADR holders will not be allowed to participate in the EGM via the Zoom Platform.

Participation via Remote Voting Ballot

As provided for in articles 26 et seq. of CVM Resolution No. 81/2022, the Company’s shareholders may submit, as of this date, their voting instructions regarding the matters subject to the EGM by completing and sending the remote voting Ballot (“Ballot”), the model for which was made available on the Company’s Investor Relations website (www.brf-global.com/ri, under Corporate Governance) and on the websites of the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (www.gov.br/cvm) and B3 SA – Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão (“B3”) (www.b3.com.br).

The Company’s shareholders may transmit their voting instructions (i) to the registrar of the shares issued by the Company (Banco Bradesco SA), (ii) to their respective custody agent, (iii) to B3, as the central depositary of the Company’s shares, or (iv) directly to the Company. In the event of sending directly to the Company, shareholders must submit the Ballot by June 14, 2025 (inclusive), duly completed, initialed and signed, exclusively through the Qi Central Platform (https://qicentral.com.br/m/age-brf-2025-06), together with the scanned copies of the necessary documents. For additional information, the shareholder must observe the rules set forth in CVM Resolution No. 81/2022 and the procedures described in the Ballot made available by the Company, as well as in the respective Manual for Participation in the EGM.

The Company’s shareholders interested in accessing information or clarifying doubts regarding the matters above should contact the Company’s Investor Relations area by telephone at +55 (11) 2322-5377 or by email at acoes@brf.com.

All documents relevant to the EGM, including the Management Proposal and more detailed information on the matters on the Agenda and on access to the Zoom Platform, are available in the EGM Participation Manual, which is available to shareholders on the websites https://ri.brf-global.com/, www.b3.com.br and www.gov.br/cvm.

Itajaí (SC), May 16, 2025.

Marcos Antonio Molina dos Santos

Chairman of the Board of Directors

3 – INSTRUCTIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING

3.1. PARTICIPATION IN THE DIGITAL ASSEMBLY

3.1.1. SHAREHOLDERS

The EGM will be held exclusively digitally, in accordance with article 124, §2º-A, of the Brazilian Corporations Law and CVM Resolution No. 81/2022, through the Zoom digital platform (“Zoom Platform”).

As provided for in article 5, §4, of CVM Resolution No. 81/2022, the Company understands that it is more appropriate to hold the Meeting now convened exclusively digitally, since this format allows for greater participation by shareholders, as it enables the presence of shareholders from any location in Brazil and abroad, as well as reducing costs both for shareholder participation and for holding the conclave.

The Company emphasizes that it will not be possible to physically attend the EGM, as it will be held exclusively digitally.

As provided for in article 6, §3, of CVM Resolution No. 81/2022, shareholders interested in participating in the EGM, in person or through proxies, must express such interest, until 9:00 AM on June 16, 2025, the date 2 (two) days prior to the EGM, sending, exclusively through the Qi Central platform (“Qi Central Platform”) (https://qicentral.com.br/m/age-brf-2025-06), the scanned copies of the following documents:

3.1.1.1. INDIVIDUAL SHAREHOLDERS

3.1.1.2. LEGAL ENTITY SHAREHOLDERS

3.1.1.3. SHAREHOLDERS REPRESENTED BY PROXY

If the shareholder has already participated in other general meetings using the sending of documents via Qi Central Platform, you must use the same access credentials, entering your email and password. If this is your first time, you must click on “Sign up now ” and enter your email address. The system will send a verification code to the registered email to complete the registration process.

The representative of more than one shareholder must, without fail, send scanned copies of the representation documentation required to qualify each shareholder to be represented by him/her at the EGM, as indicated above.

3.1.1.4. FOREIGN SHAREHOLDERS

Foreign shareholders must present the same documentation as Brazilian shareholders, except that the corporate documents of the legal entity and the power of attorney must be translated in sworn form, and do not require notarization or consularization.

3.1.1.5. INSTRUCTIONS FOR ACCESSING THE DIGITAL PLATFORM

After verifying the regularity of the documents sent for participation in the EGM, the Company will send to the shareholders (or their duly appointed representatives or attorneys) who have submitted the required documentation within the deadline and under the conditions described above, by email, individual invitations to access the Zoom Platform and the respective instructions for accessing the electronic system for participation in the EGM, including the password required for this purpose.

Shareholders who do not submit the documents required above within the deadline (until 9:00 AM on the 16th) June 2025) and in the manner referred to above will not be able to participate in the EGM.

Shareholders who have duly sent the required documentation and do not receive the email from the Company with instructions for accessing and participating in the EGM by 9:00 AM on June 17, 2025, must contact the Company at acoes@brf.com so that their respective instructions for accessing the Zoom Platform can be resent.

The Company emphasizes that it will be the sole responsibility of the shareholder to ensure the compatibility of their equipment with the use of the Zoom Platform. BRF is not responsible for any operational or connection problems that shareholders may face or other situations that are not under the control of the Company, such as instability in the internet connection or incompatibility of the Zoom Platform with the equipment of the shareholder or his/her representative. The EGM will be recorded, in accordance with article 28, §1, item II of CVM Resolution No. 81/2022.

The Company recommends that shareholders familiarize themselves with the use of the Zoom Platform in advance, as well as ensure that their respective electronic devices are compatible with the use of the Zoom Platform (via video and audio). The Company also recommends that shareholders access the electronic system made available for participation in the EGM at least 30 (thirty) minutes before the scheduled start time of the EGM, in order to allow validation of access and participation of all shareholders who use it.

The duly registered shareholder who participates through the electronic system made available by the Company will be considered present at the EGM (being able to exercise their respective voting rights) and signatory of the respective minutes, pursuant to article 47, item III and §1, of CVM Resolution No. 81/2022.

The Company also emphasizes that the information and guidelines for accessing the Zoom Platform, including, but not limited to, the access password, are unique and non-transferable, with the shareholder (or his/her respective attorney, as the case may be) assuming full responsibility for the possession and confidentiality of the information and guidelines transmitted to him/her by the Company under the terms of this Manual.

3.1.2. HOLDERS OF AMERICAN DEPOSITARY RECEIPTS - ADRs

Holders of ADRs will be represented at the EGM by The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary institution, pursuant to the “Deposit Agreement” entered into with the Company. ADR holders will not be allowed to participate in the EGM via the Zoom Platform.

3.2. PARTICIPATION VIA REMOTE VOTING BALLOT

As provided for in articles 26 et seq. of CVM Resolution No. 81/2022, the Company’s shareholders may submit, as of this date, their voting instructions regarding the matters subject to the EGM by completing and sending the remote voting Ballot (“Ballot”), the model for which has been made available, separately, on the Company’s Investor Relations website (http://ri.brf-global.com , under Corporate Governance) and on the websites of CVM (www.gov.br/cvm) and B3 (www.b3.com.br).

In this sense, the Ballot must:

Shareholders who choose to exercise their voting rights through the Ballot must do so using one of the options described below:

3.2.1. By filling instructions transmitted to the Company’s registrar

This option is exclusively intended for shareholders holding shares registered by Bradesco and which are not deposited in a central depository:

Shareholders holding shares that are not deposited in a central depository and who choose to exercise their right to vote remotely through service providers may transmit their voting instructions to the registrar of shares issued by BRF, Bradesco, in compliance with the rules determined by the latter.

To this end, shareholders must appear at any of the Bradesco Branches by June 14, 2025, during local banking hours, with the printed, completed, initialed and signed Ballot, as well as the documents listed in the table below, so that the information contained in the Ballot can be transferred to Bradesco’s systems.

In case of doubts, shareholders may contact Bradesco through the following channels:

Bradesco informs that the above data was entered only so that the shareholder has a channel to clarify any doubts regarding the submission of the Ballot to the registrar. However, Bradesco will not accept the receipt of the Ballot by electronic means, and only Ballots submitted through any Bradesco agency will be considered, under the terms and conditions specified in this Meeting Manual.

3.2.2. By filling instructions transmitted to their respective custody agents

This option is exclusively intended for shareholders holding shares held in custody at B3. In this case, remote voting will be exercised by shareholders in accordance with the procedures adopted by their custody agents.

Shareholders holding shares deposited in the B3 Central Depository who choose to exercise their right to vote remotely through their respective custodian agents must observe the rules determined by them, who, in turn, will forward such voting statements to the B3 Central Depository.

Since the provision of the service of collecting and transmitting instructions for filling out the Ballot is optional for custody agents, we recommend that shareholders check whether their custodian is authorized to provide such service and what procedures they have established for issuing voting instructions, as well as the documents and information they require.

If your respective custody agent does not provide remote voting services, the shareholder will have the option of sending his/her Ballot and applicable documents to B3, as the central depository of the Company’s shares, or directly to the Company itself, as per items 3.2.3 and 3.3.4 below.

3.2.3. By filling instructions transmitted to B3, as the central depository of the Company’s shares.

This option is also exclusively intended for shareholders holding shares deposited at B3.

In this case, the shareholder holding shares deposited with B3 who chooses to exercise his/her right to vote remotely by transmitting his/her voting instructions directly to B3, as the central depository, must observe the rules and operational procedures determined by B3 itself for the collection and transmission of instructions for completing the remote voting form.

3.2.4. By sending the Remote Voting Ballot directly to BRF

Shareholders may also, as an alternative to the procedures described in items 3.2.1 to 3.2.3 above, send the Ballot directly to the Company.

To this end, shareholders must print the Ballot, fill it out, initial all pages and sign it. Then, shareholders must, by June 14, 2025, send the Ballot, duly completed, initialed and signed, exclusively through the Qi Central Platform (https://qicentral.com.br/m/age-brf-2025-06), together with the scanned copies of the documents described below:

Individuals

Legal entities

Investment Funds

The Company does not require the Ballot to be notarized or certified by consulates.

Corporate and representation documents of legal entities and investment funds drawn up in a foreign language must be translated in sworn form, and do not require notarization or consularization.

Within 3 (three) days of receipt of said documents, the Company will inform the shareholder, via the electronic address indicated in the Ballot, about their receipt and acceptance.

If the Ballot is not fully completed or accompanied by the supporting documents described above, it will be disregarded and such information will be sent to the shareholder via the email address indicated on the Ballot, informing him/her of the need to rectify or resend the Ballot or the documents accompanying it (provided there is sufficient time), describing the procedures and deadlines necessary to regularize the remote vote.

BRF highlights that:

3.3. QUORUMS APPLICABLE TO THE EGM

3.3.1. Installation Quorums

According to article 125 of the Brazilian Corporations Law, subject to the exceptions provided for by law, the general meeting shall be installed, on first call, with the presence of shareholders representing at least 1/4 (one quarter) of the total votes conferred by the shares with voting rights; and, on second call, with the presence of any number of shareholders.

If the quorum applicable at the first call is not reached, the Company will announce a new date for holding the EGM, as the case may be, and may, at the second call, be held with any number of shareholders present.

3.3.2. Quorum for Deliberation

The approval of the transaction of Merger issued by the Company will require a favorable vote of at least half of the shares with voting rights issued by BRF, pursuant to Article 252, §2, of the Brazilian Corporations Law.

3.4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST

If any of the shareholders present alleges a supposed conflict of interest of a shareholder that prevents him from voting at the EGM, or, further, the occurrence of another legal hypothesis of impediment to voting and the shareholder himself has not declared his impediment, the chairman or secretary of the EGM board must suspend the deliberation to hear and receive such allegation, together with any opposing statement from the shareholder in question, before putting the matter to a vote.

The chairman of the EGM board may, upon finding a possible impediment to voting, ask the shareholder for clarification on the situation, before putting the matter to a vote.

In line with the CVM’s understanding, the chairman of the board only has the power to declare an impediment to voting in situations where such impediment is unequivocal and the shareholder does not abstain from voting, and is not authorized to impede voting in other situations, without prejudice to the legal provisions on the possible nullification of the vote cast.

4 – BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ PROPOSAL

BRF S.A.

Publicly-held company

CNPJ 01.838.723/0001-27

NIRE 42.300.034.240

BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ PROPOSAL FOR THE EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 18, 2025

Dear Shareholders,

In compliance with the provisions of Resolution No. 81/2022 of the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (“CVM”), we present below the management proposal (“Proposal”) of BRF S.A. (“Company” or “BRF”), containing the information and documents related to the matters to be deliberated at the Company’s Extraordinary General Meeting, to be held on June 18, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. hours (“EGM”), exclusively digitally, through the Zoom platform (“Zoom Platform”).

Initially, the Company’s Management clarifies that the matters on the agenda to be deliberated at the EGM are within the context of the merger transaction, by Marfrig Global Foods SA (“MGF” and, together with BRF, “Companies”), of all shares issued by BRF, not held by MGF on the Closing Date (as defined below), in exchange for the delivery to BRF shareholders (except MGF) of common shares issued by MGF, in accordance with the Exchange Ratio (as defined below), with the consequent transfer of BRF’s shareholder base to MGF, in accordance with article 252 of the Brazilian Corporations Law (“Merger”). Upon completion of the Merger, BRF will become a wholly owned subsidiary of MGF.

The Merger aims to create a global food company based on a multi-protein platform, strong presence in the domestic and international markets, portfolio diversification, scale, efficiency and sustainability, providing significant benefits for both Companies, their shareholders, customers, suppliers, employees and other stakeholders, generating operational, financial and strategic synergies.

Additionally, the Companies understand that the Merger allows for the simplification and optimization of the administrative and corporate structure of the economic group to which the Companies belong, eliminating or reducing redundant costs, as well as improving or facilitating access to the capital necessary for the development of their business plans.

In this sense, the Companies foresee significant strategic value added to the Merger, driving the global consolidation of their businesses and strengthening their brands through a robust multi-protein platform, including, among others, (i) solidifying the Companies’ presence as a dominant force in the global food market; (ii) strategic expansion into new markets, maximizing growth opportunities and commercial synergies, including cross-selling initiatives; (iii) increasing the scale and diversification of their operations, improving resilience and mitigating risks arising from the seasonality of the sector and macroeconomic variables.

The completion of the Merger is subject to the verification (or waiver, as the case may be) of the Conditions Precedent (as defined below) described in the Plan of Merger (as defined below), as well as the advent of the Closing Date.

Therefore, the matters submitted for consideration by the Meeting are interdependent, interrelated, and subject to the verification (or waiver) of the Conditions Precedent and the advent of the Closing Date. The verification of the Conditions Precedent, the Closing Date and, therefore, the effectiveness of the resolutions taken at the Meeting, will be communicated to the shareholders by means of a communication to be disclosed by the Company in a timely manner, in accordance with the applicable legislation and regulations.

(i) Approve the “Plan of Merger for the Merger of BRF S.A. Shares into Marfrig Global Foods S.A.”, entered into on May 15, 2025 between the Company and Marfrig Global Foods SA (“MGF”), as amended and restated by means of the “First Amendment to the Plan of Merger for the Merger of BRF S.A. Shares into Marfrig Global Foods S.A.”, entered into between the Companies on May 26, 2025 (“Plan of Merger”), which establishes the terms and conditions for the incorporation of all shares issued by BRF by MGF (with the exception of those held by MGF), as provided for in article 252 of Brazilian Federal Law No. 6,404/1976 (“Brazilian Corporations Law”) (“Merger”);

Management Proposal :

Pursuant to articles 224 and 225 of the Brazilian Corporations Law, in conjunction with article 252 of the Brazilian Corporations Law, the directors of the Company and MGF entered into the “Plan of Merger for the Merger of BRF S.A. Shares into Marfrig Global Foods S.A.”, on May 15, 2025, which contains the terms, general conditions and justifications for the Merger, as amended and restated by means of the “First Amendment to the Plan of Merger for the Merger of BRF S.A. Shares into Marfrig Global Foods S.A.”, entered into between the Companies on May 26, 2025 (“Plan of Merger”).

The Merger will result in: (i) MGF owning all shares issued by BRF; and (ii) BRF shareholders (except MGF) receiving 0.8521 common shares issued by MGF for each common share issued by BRF held on the Closing Date (as defined below) (“Exchange Ratio”), subject to adjustments, in accordance with the Plan of Merger.

The negotiation and establishment of the Exchange Ratio took into consideration the distribution of dividends and/or interest on equity in the gross amount of (i) R$ 3,520,000,000.00 (three billion, five hundred and twenty million reais) by BRF; and (ii) R$ 2,500,000,000.00 (two billion, five hundred million reais) by MGF, in both cases, to be resolved after payment of the exercise of the right of withdrawal by any Dissenting Shareholders (as defined below) and up to and including the Closing Date (collectively, “Permitted Distributions”). Accordingly, any Dissenting Shareholders who exercise their right of withdrawal will not be entitled to receive the Permitted Distributions.

As a result of the Merger, shares corresponding to shares eventually held in treasury by BRF will not be issued by MGF, which will be canceled by BRF by the Closing Date (as defined below).

The Exchange Ratio shall be adjusted proportionally only in the event of (i) stock splits, reverse splits or share bonuses; issued by any of the Companies; and/or (ii) in accordance with the methodology provided for in Annex 3.1.5 of the Plan of Merger. In accordance with the methodology described in Annex 3.1.5 of the Protocol and Justification, any disbursements incurred by the Companies due to the exercise of withdrawal rights will reduce the Permitted Distributions by an equivalent amount, applied proportionally to both Companies.

The replacement of the shares issued by BRF underlying the American Depositary Shares representing common shares issued by BRF within the scope of the Merger will be carried out in accordance with the terms of the respective deposit agreement (deposit agreement).

Any fractions of common shares issued by MGF resulting from the Merger will be grouped into whole numbers and then sold on the spot market managed by B3 after the consummation of the Merger, under the terms of a communication to be timely disclosed to the market by the Companies. The amounts obtained in said sale will be made available, net of fees, to former BRF shareholders who are entitled to the respective fractions, in proportion to their interest in each share sold.

Considering that the Merger is a transaction involving the controlling company, MGF, and the controlled company, BRF, in compliance with CVM Guidance Opinion No. 35/2008, the special independent committee of BRF (“BRF Independent Committee”) was established, whose function was to negotiate the Exchange Ratio and other terms and conditions of the transaction involving the Companies and submit its recommendation to the board of directors of BRF. Additionally, the board of directors of MGF established the special independent committee of MGF (“MGF Independent Committee ” and, together with the BRF Independent Committee, “Independent Committees”), which was responsible for the initial proposal and subsequent negotiation of the Exchange Ratio with the BRF Independent Committee. In this context, the Exchange Ratio was exhaustively negotiated between the Independent Committees, taking into account the fair value of the Companies, and its recommendation was approved by both Independent Committees at a meeting held on May 15, 2025. In issuing the favorable recommendation for the transaction, the Independent Committees considered, with the collaboration of their external advisors, a variety of factors, so that the Exchange Ratio was not determined based on a single criterion, but on a variety of combined criteria.

The BRF Independent Committee, in the development of its work, had the following advisors (i) Citigroup Global Markets Brasil Corretora de Câmbio, Títulos e Valores Mobiliários SA, which acted as financial advisor to the Committee (“Citigroup” or “Financial Advisor”); (ii) Eizirik Advogados, which acted as legal advisor to the BRF Independent Committee (“Legal Advisor”); and (iii) Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, which acted as legal advisor to the Independent Committee on matters related to US law, in view of the existence of American Depositary Receipts. – ADRs, backed by common shares issued by BRF, traded on the stock market of the United States of America – USA.

On May 15, 2025, Citigroup presented to the BRF Independent Committee its Fairness Opinion on the conditions proposed for the Merger (“Fairness Opinion”), indicating that the conditions negotiated for the Merger by the BRF Independent Committee, relating to the Exchange Ratio with the payment of dividends and/or interest on equity in the amount referred to above, are fair from a financial point of view.

Annexes I, II and III to this Proposal include, respectively, the Plan of Merger, the Report with the Recommendation of the Independent Committee and the Fairness Opinion prepared by Citigroup.

Annex IV to this Proposal contains the Minutes of the Meetings of the Board of Directors, Independent Special Committee, Audit and Integrity Committee and Fiscal Council of BRF that deliberated on the Merger.

In view of the above, the Company’s Management proposes to the shareholders the approval of the Plan of Merger, which contains all the terms and conditions for the implementation of the Merger.

(ii) approve the Merger, the effectiveness of which will be subject to the verification (or waiver, as applicable) of the Conditions Precedent (as defined in the Plan of Merger) and the advent of the date on which the Merger will be considered consummated, in accordance with the Plan of Merger (“Closing Date”);

Management Proposal :

The Company’s Management proposes to the shareholders the approval of the Merger, under the terms described in the Plan of Merger, the effectiveness of which will be subject to the verification (or waiver, as applicable) of the Conditions Precedent (defined below) and the advent of the Closing Date.

The Management highlights that, under the terms of CVM Resolution No. 78/2022:

As provided for in articles 137 and 252, paragraph 2, of the Brazilian Corporations Law, if the Merger is approved by the EGM, the holders of common shares issued by the Company may exercise their right to withdraw from the Company.

The right of withdrawal shall be granted to shareholders who (i) hold shares issued by the Company uninterruptedly, from the date of disclosure of the first material fact regarding the Merger until the date of consummation of the Merger; (ii) do not vote in favor of the Merger, abstain from voting or do not attend the EGM, as the case may be, which will deliberate on the Merger; and (iii) expressly state their intention to exercise the right of withdrawal, within 30 (thirty) days from the date of publication of the minutes of the EGM, as the case may be.

For more information on the right of withdrawal applicable to the Company’s dissenting shareholders, see Annex VII of this Management Proposal, prepared under the terms of article 21 and Annex H of CVM Resolution No. 81/2022. Information on the right of withdrawal applicable to BRF’s dissenting shareholders is included in the Plan of Merger.

The effectiveness of the Merger shall be subject to the following conditions: (i) from the date of execution of the Plan of Merger and up to the Closing Date (inclusive), there shall not be an occurrence of war, armed conflicts, natural disasters and/or other events (e.g., health calamities; fires in manufacturing units) that adversely and significantly impact the production and/or marketing capacity (including export) of any of the Companies; and (ii) all acts necessary for the conclusion of the Merger and consummation of the operations contemplated in this Plan of Merger must have been approved by the Brazilian Administrative Council for Economic Defense – CADE, to the extent that such approval is necessary, in the form and terms of current legislation and regulations (“Conditions Precedent”).

Provided that it is permitted by applicable law and regulations, the Companies may, by mutual agreement, waive the Conditions Precedent in writing.

Once the Merger has been approved by the EGM and the Extraordinary General Meeting of MGF, the Companies and their respective managements must perform all acts and measures necessary to implement the Merger, including, without limitation, with respect to the verification or waiver of the Conditions Precedent, as applicable, and it is the Companies’ responsibility to disclose to the market, in accordance with applicable legislation and regulations, the date on which the Merger will, for all intents and purposes, be considered consummated (“Closing Date”).

The Merger will result in an increase in MGF’s net equity in the amount of R$14,933,103,366.87 (fourteen million, nine hundred and thirty-three million, one hundred and three thousand, three hundred and sixty-six reais and eighty-seven cents), supported by the value attributed to the shares issued by BRF to be merged into MGF (that is, without considering the shares issued by BRF held in treasury and the shares issued by BRF held by MGF), based on the Merger Valuation Report (as defined below) and considering the elimination of the investment held by MGF in BRF, provided that the amount of (i) R$4,977,203,352.18 (four billion, nine hundred and seventy-seven million, two hundred and three thousand, three hundred and fifty-two reais and eighteen cents) will be allocated to MGF’s share capital account; and (ii) the remaining amount will be allocated to the MGF capital reserve account.

Due to the allocation to the MGF share capital account mentioned above, on the Closing Date, the share capital of MGF will be R$15,468,781,313.18 (fifteen billion, four hundred and sixty-eight million, seven hundred and eighty-one thousand, three hundred and thirteen reais and eighteen cents).

Without prejudice to any adjustments to the Exchange Ratio to be made under the terms of the Plan of Merger, the Merger will comprise the issuance by MGF of 639,743,458 (six hundred and thirty-nine million, seven hundred and forty-three thousand, four hundred and fifty-eight) common shares, to be subscribed by the directors of BRF, on behalf of the then shareholders of BRF (with the exception of MGF) on the Closing Date, under the terms of article 252, §2, of the Brazilian Corporations Law.

It is reiterated that the increase in share capital and the issuance of shares by MGF in connection with the Merger will only be effective on the Closing Date, with the consummation of the Merger. It is worth noting that, pursuant to article 252, §1, of the Brazilian Corporations Law, MGF shareholders will not have preemptive rights to subscribe to the shares issued as a result of the Merger.

Due to the increase in share capital and the issuance of shares by MGF under the terms above, article 5, caput, of MGF’s bylaws will come into force with the following wording, subject to any adjustments to the Exchange Ratio:

“Article 5. The Company’s share capital, fully subscribed and paid up, is R$15,468,781,313.18 (fifteen billion, four hundred and sixty-eight million, seven hundred and eighty-one thousand, three hundred and thirteen reais and eighteen cents), divided into 1,497,671,577 (one billion, four hundred and ninety-seven million, six hundred and seventy-one thousand, five hundred and seventy-seven) common shares, all registered, book-entry and with no par value.”

In the event of adjustments to the Exchange Ratio, the Board of Directors of MGF shall have the power to confirm the actual number of shares to be issued by MGF within the scope of the Merger. In such case, the Board of Directors of MGF shall be responsible for approving, ad referendum of the first general meeting of MGF to be held after the Closing Date, a new amendment to the caput of article 5 of the bylaws of MGF, for the purpose of assigning the number of shares into which the share capital of MGF shall be divided as a result of the Merger.

Annexes VI, VII, and VIII to this Management Proposal contain the information required by Annexes H and I and by article 9 and CVM Resolution No. 81/2022.

Annexes IX and X to this Management Proposal contain information on the origin and justification for the amendments to MGF’s Bylaws, as well as their legal and economic effects, and a copy of MGF’s Bylaws containing, highlighted, the proposed amendments, prepared in accordance with article 12, items I and II, of CVM Resolution No. 81/2022.

(iii) ratify the appointment of the specialized company Apsis Consultoria Empresarial Ltda., registered with the CNPJ/MF under no. 08.681.365/0001-30 and CRC/RJ under no. 005112/O-9, headquartered in the City of Rio de Janeiro, State of Rio de Janeiro, at Rua do Passeio, no. 62, 6th floor, Centro, CEP 20021-290, (“Appraisal Company”), as responsible for preparing (a) the appraisal report, at market value, of the shares issued by BRF to be incorporated by MGF, within the scope of the Merger (“Merger Appraisal Report”); and (b) the appraisal report containing the calculation of the exchange ratio of the shares held by the non-controlling shareholders of BRF, based on the net equity value of the shares of MGF and BRF, with both assets being appraised according to the same criteria and on December 31, 2024, at market prices, pursuant to article 264 of the Brazilian Corporations Law (“264 Appraisal Report”);

Management Proposal:

The Company’s Management proposes to the shareholders the ratification of the appointment of Apsis Consultoria Empresarial Ltda., registered with the CNPJ/MF under no. 08.681.365/0001-30 and CRC/RJ under no. 005112/O-9, headquartered in the City of Rio de Janeiro, State of Rio de Janeiro, at Rua do Passeio, no. 62, 6th floor, Centro, CEP 20021-290 (“Appraisal Company”) as the appraisal company responsible for preparing the Appraisal Reports (as defined below).

Annexes XI and XII to this Proposal contain the information required by Annex L of CVM Resolution No. 81/2022, as well as the work proposal and the remuneration proposal of the Appraisal Company.

(iv) approve the Merger Appraisal Report;

Management Proposal:

Under the terms of the Brazilian Corporations Law, it was established in the Plan of Merger that the shares issued by BRF that will be incorporated by MGF, within the scope of the Merger, will be assessed at their market value.

In this sense, the Appraisal Company prepared the appraisal report, at market value, of the shares issued by BRF to be incorporated by MGF, within the scope of the Merger, on the base date of May 14, 2025 (“Merger Appraisal Report”).

As provided for in the Merger Appraisal Report, the Valuation Company concluded that the market value of the shares issued by BRF to be incorporated by MGF, on the base date of May 14, 2025, corresponds to the total amount of R$15,406,097,591.16 (fifteen billion, four hundred and six million, ninety-seven thousand, five hundred and ninety-one reais and sixteen cents) (already adjusted to consider the elimination of the investment held by Marfrig in BRF).

Therefore, the Company’s Management proposes to the shareholders the approval of the Merger Appraisal Report that is part of Annex 4.3 of the Plan of Merger.

(v) approve 264 Appraisal Report;

Management Proposal:

Under the terms of article 264 of the Brazilian Corporations Law, the Appraisal Company prepared an appraisal report containing the calculation of the exchange ratio of the shares held by the non-controlling shareholders of BRF, based on the net equity value of the shares of MGF and BRF, with both assets being appraised according to the same criteria and on the Base Date, at market prices (“264 Appraisal Report”).

If the exchange ratio resulting from the Merger were calculated based on 264 Appraisal Report, 2.26148341591578 common shares issued by MGF would be attributed for each 1 (one) common share issued by BRF held by BRF shareholders (except MGF). Therefore, it is clear that the exchange ratio calculated based on 264 Appraisal Report is more advantageous for BRF shareholders than the proposal contained in the Plan of Merger.

In this sense, the provisions of article 264, §3, of the Brazilian Corporations Law will be applicable, so that dissenting shareholders of BRF may choose between (i) the reimbursement amount set under article 45 of the Brazilian Corporations Law, which corresponds to R$9.43 (nine reais and forty-three cents) per share; or (ii) the equity value per share issued by BRF, determined based on 264 Appraisal Report, which corresponds to R$19.89 (nineteen reais and eighty-nine cents) per share.

The Company’s Management proposes to shareholders the approval of the 264 Appraisal Report prepared by the Valuation Company, which is included in Annex 4.6 of the Plan of Merger.

(iv) authorize the Company’s managers to perform all acts necessary to consummate the Merger, including, without limitation, the subscription of common shares to be issued by MGF on behalf of BRF’s shareholders (except MGF) on the date of consummation of the Merger, pursuant to article 252, §2, of the Brazilian Corporations Law.

Management Proposal : In view of the recommendation for approval of the other items on the agenda, BRF Management also proposes to the shareholders that they authorize the Company’s Management to perform all other acts that are necessary for the implementation of the Merger, in accordance with the Plan of Merger and this Proposal, including, as provided for in article 252, §2nd, of the Brazilian Corporations Law, the subscription of common shares to be issued by MGF on behalf of BRF shareholders (with the exception of MGF) on the Closing Date.

*          *           *

The Company’s shareholders interested in accessing information or clarifying doubts regarding the above proposals should contact the Investor Relations area by telephone at +55 (11) 2322-5377 or by email at acoes@brf.com . All documents related to this EGM are available to shareholders on the websites https://ri.brf-global.com/, www.b3.com.br and www.gov.br/cvm.

Sao Paulo, May 26, 2025.

Annexes to the Management Proposal for the Extraordinary General Meeting of BRF S.A., to be held on June 18, 2025

Annex I – Amended and Restated Plan of Merger

Annex II – Recommendation Report of the Independent Special Committee

Annex III – Fairness Opinion prepared by Citigroup Global Markets

Annex IV – Minutes of the Meetings of the Board of Directors, Independent Special Committee, Audit and Integrity Committee and Fiscal Council of BRF that deliberated on the Merger

Annex V – Pro Forma Financial Statements of Marfrig Global Foods S.A.

Annex VI – Information on the Merger indicated in Annex I to CVM Resolution No. 81/2022

Annex VII – Information on the right of withdrawal indicated in Annex H to CVM Resolution No. 81/2022

Annex VIII - Information required by article 9 of CVM Resolution No. 81/2022

Annex IX – Proposed Amendment to the Bylaws of Marfrig Global Foods SA

Annex X – Report on the Proposed Amendment to the Bylaws of Marfrig Global Foods SA

Annex XI – Information about Apsis Consultoria Empresarial Ltda. (According to article 25 and Annex L of CVM Resolution No. 81/2022)

Annex XII – Proposal of Work and Remuneration from Apsis Consultoria Empresarial Ltda.

Annex XIII - Description of the capital and control structure of MGF, in accordance with section 6 of the reference form, after the Merger

*          *           *

Annex I – Amended and Restated Plan of Merger

This business combination involves the securities of a Brazilian company. The business combination is subject to disclosure requirements of Brazil that are different from those of the United States. Financial statements included in the document, if any, have been prepared in accordance with foreign accounting standards that may not be comparable to financial statements of United States companies.

It may be difficult for you to enforce your rights and any claim you may have arising under the U.S. federal securities laws, since the issuer is located in Brazil, and some or all of its officers and directors may be residents of Brazil. You may not be able to sue a Brazilian company or its officers or directors in a Brazilian court for violations of the U.S. securities laws. It may be difficult to compel a Brazilian company and its affiliates to subject themselves to a U.S. court’s judgment.

You should be aware that the issuer may purchase securities otherwise than under the exchange offer, such as in open market or privately negotiated purchases.

*            *         *

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN OF MERGER FOR THE MERGER OF BRF S.A. SHARES INTO MARFRIG GLOBAL FOODS S.A.

By this private instrument, the directors of the companies identified below, as well as the companies themselves:

WHEREAS:

NOW THEREFORE RESOLVE, having agreed and agreed among themselves, to enter into this “First Amendment to the Plan of Merger for the Merger of BRF S.A. Shares into Marfrig Global Foods S.A.” (“Amendment”), under the terms and conditions below.

“ 8.1. Conditions Precedent. The effectiveness of the Merger of Shares will be subject to the following conditions (collectively, the “Conditions Precedent”):

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties sign this Plan of Merger electronically, together with the 2 (two) witnesses below.

São Paulo, May 26, 2025.

(Signature page follows.)

(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.)

(Signature page of the First Amendment to the Plan of Merger for the Merger of BRF S.A. into Marfrig Global Foods S.A., executed on 26 May, 2025)

MARFRIG GLOBAL FOODS S.A.

BRF S.A.

Witnesses:

Annex (A)

Amended and Restated Plan of Merger

AMENDED AND RESTATED PLAN OF MERGER FOR THE MERGER OF BRF S.A. SHARES INTO MARFRIG GLOBAL FOODS S.A.

By this private instrument, the directors of the companies identified below, as well as the companies themselves:

WHEREAS:

NOW THEREFORE RESOLVE, having mutually agreed and resolved, to execute this Plan of Merger for the merger of BRF S.A. Shares into Marfrig Global Foods S.A.” (“Plan of Merger”), in accordance with the provisions of Articles 224, 225, and 252 of Law No. 6,404, dated December 15, 1976 (“Brazilian Corporations Law”), to regulate the terms and conditions applicable to the Merger (as defined in Clause 1.1 below), subject to the satisfaction (or waiver, as the case may be) of the Conditions Precedent (as defined in Clause 8.1 below) and the occurrence of the Closing Date (as defined in Clause 8.2 below).

“Article 5. The Company’s share capital, fully subscribed and paid-up, is R$15,468,781,313.18 (fifteen billion, four hundred and sixty-eight million, seven hundred and eighty-one thousand, three hundred and thirteen reais and eighteen centavos), divided into 1,497,671,577 (one billion, four hundred and ninety-seven million, six hundred and seventy-one thousand, five hundred and seventy-seven) common shares, all registered, in book-entry form and with no par value.”

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties sign this Plan of Merger electronically, together with the 2 (two) witnesses below.

*      *      *

Annex 3.1.5

Exchange Ratio Adjustment Mechanism

R = B2 ÷ M2, where:

Annex 4.2

Merger Appraisal Report

(This annex begins on the following page.)

(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.)

APPRAISAL REPORT AP - 00521/25 - 01 BRF S.A.

APPRAISAL REPORT: AP - 00521/25 - 01 VALUATION DATE: May 14 th , 2025 1 REQUESTER: MARFRIG GLOBAL FOODS S.A., hereinafter referred to as MARFRIG. Publicly held corporation, headquartered at Av. Queiroz Filho, No. 1.560, Bloco 5, Sabiá Tower, 3 rd Floor, Room 301, Vila Hamburguesa, City and State of São Paulo, registered with the CNPJ under No. 03.853.896/0001 - 40. OBJECT: Shares of BRF S.A., hereinafter referred to as BRF. Publicly held corporation, headquartered at Rua Jorge Tzachel, No. 475, Fazenda, City of Itajaí, State of Santa Catarina, registered with the CNPJ under No. 01.838.723/0001 - 27. OBJECTIVE: Determination of the value of the shares issued by BRF, using the market approach, through the volume - weighted average price of the shares, in compliance with article 252 of Law No. 6,404/1976 (Brazilian Corporation Law).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APSIS CONSULTORIA E AVALIAÇÕES LTDA . , hereinafter referred to as APSIS, headquartered at Rua do Passeio, No . 62 , 6 th floor, Centro, City and State of Rio de Janeiro, registered with the CNPJ under No . 08 . 681 . 365 / 0001 - 30 , was appointed to determine the market value of BRF shares, to be merged by MARFRIG, for the purpose of complying with the provisions of article 252 of Law No . 6 , 404 / 1976 (Brazilian Corporation Law) . In this Report, we use the market approach, through the Volume - Weighted Average Price (VWAP) 1 of the shares, to determine the equity value of BRF . The methodology aims to value a company by the sum of all its shares at market prices . Because the price of a stock is defined by the present value of the future dividend stream and a sale price at the end of the period, at a required rate of return, under the Efficient Market Hypothesis, this approach would indicate the correct value of the company to investors, when not affected by factors such as the stock's liquidity in the market . For the selection of the intervals considered in the VWAP calculation, we applied the criteria generally accepted in the market for operations of this nature, in line with the usual practices of the appraised company’s industry, and with parameters provided for in Law No . 6 , 404 / 76 (Brazilian Corporation Law) and CVM Resolution No . 85 / 22 , Annex C . The selection of these intervals was based on the representativeness and liquidity of the shares traded in the period, in order to faithfully reflect the market value of the company under normal trading conditions, mitigating any distortions . The following criteria were considered for the evaluation : ▪ The shares’ spot price on the last business day prior to the issuance of this Report. ▪ Volume - weighted average price of the shares traded on the stock exchange or in the organized over - the - counter market, during the 30 days immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of this Report. ▪ Volume - weighted average price of shares traded on the stock exchange or in the organized over - the - counter market, during the 90 days immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of this Report. ▪ Volume - weighted average price of shares traded on the stock exchange or in the organized over - the - counter market, during the 12 months immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of the Report. Note : any differences between the valuation date and the analyzed dates are due to market closures on the respective dates . 1 The Volume - Weighted Average Price (VWAP) is calculated based on the average of closing prices, weighted by the volume traded. The data was extracted from the S&P Capital IQ Pro platform. 2

VALUATION THROUGH THE VOLUME - WEIGHTED AVERAGE PRICE OF SHARES ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE 2 Arm’s length transaction: An "arm's length" transaction refers to a deal in which buyers and sellers act independently, without one party influencing the other. SPOT VWAP 1 PERIOD DESCRIPTION REFERENCE 19.68 - - 20.74 14/05/2025 31/03/2025 - 14/05/2025 Share price on the last business day prior to the issuance of the report (spot) 30 days prior to the last business day before the issuance of the report n/a a - 20.52 02/01/2025 - 14/05/2025 90 days prior to the last business day before the issuance of the report b - 22.21 15/05/2024 - 14/05/2025 12 months prior to the last business day before the issuance of the report c BRF'S EQUITY VALUE (BRL '000) PERIOD (mm/dd/yyyy) VALUATION BASED ON THE VOLUME - WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF PRICE OF SHARES ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE 20.52 02/01/2025 - 14/05/2025 VWAP on the 90 days immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of the Report. (R$) 1,600,310,613 10/05/2025* Quantity of BRF common stock (shares)* 32,844,025 BRF'S EQUITY VALUE (BRL '000) *Source: BRF's Investor Relations website. Excluding Treasury Shares. Accessed on 15/05/2025. <https://ri.brf - global.com/en/corporate - gov ernance/shareholder - structure/> 1. Volume - Weighted Average Price (VWAP) - Source data extracted from S&P Capital IQ Pro. Note: Eventual diferences between the base date and analyzed dates are due to market closures on the respective dates. Adopted methodology. CONCLUSION The appraisers concluded that the most appropriate methodology for BRF's valuation is the value of the volume - weighted average price of the shares in the 90 days prior to the last business day before the issuance of the Report . This methodology covers the period closest to the Report’s date of signature, offering a sufficiently large and representative sample, which contributes to diluting any specific distortions of price and volume . In addition, it complies with the parameters established in Article 256 of the Brazilian Corporation Law and in Annex C of CVM Resolution No . 85 / 22 . Based on this approach, the volume - weighted average price of BRF's shares is R $ 20 . 52 (twenty reais and fifty - two cents) per share, resulting in a total equity value of R $ 32 , 844 , 025 thousand (thirty - two billion, eight hundred and forty four million, twenty five thousand reais) . The appraisers consider that the volume - weighted average price of the shares is the most appropriate criterion to determine the fair price of the company's shares . According to the appraisers’ understanding, all the methodologies adopted are based on negotiations carried out between independent parties, with full knowledge of the business and free of pressure or interests unrelated to the essence of the transaction, being, due to these characteristics, classified as operations carried out under conditions of independence, or arm's length . 2 In addition, it should be noted that the methodology adopted for the conclusion of this Report is in accordance with Level 1 of the information hierarchy provided for in Technical Pronouncement CPC 46 (Fair Value Measurement), issued by the Brazilian Accounting Pronouncements Committee (CPC) which prioritizes the use of observable and reliable data, considered the most appropriate for measuring the fair value of assets . 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................................... ... ............................................................................................................................. ... .......................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ................... 5 2. PRINCIPLES AND CAVEATS ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. .. 6 3. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... . 7 4. BRF CHARACTERIZATION ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... .. 8 5. VALUATION METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. 9 6. VALUATION THROUGH THE VOLUME - WEIGHTED AVERAGE PRICE OF SHARES ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE.................................................................................................................... 10 7. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ..................... 13 8. LIST OF ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ............. 14 4

1. INTRODUCTION APSIS CONSULTORIA E AVALIAÇÕES LTDA . , hereinafter referred to as APSIS, headquartered at Rua do Passeio, No . 62 , 6 th floor, Centro, City and State of Rio de Janeiro, registered with the CNPJ under No . 08 . 681 . 365 / 0001 - 30 , was appointed to determine the market value of BRF shares, to be merged by MARFRIG, for the purpose of complying with the provisions in article 252 of Law No . 6 , 404 / 1976 (Brazilian Corporation Law) . In the preparation of this work, data and information provided by third parties were used, in the form of documents and verbal interviews with the client . The estimates used in this process are based on : ▪ Public information collected in the S&P Capital IQ Pro platform. ▪ Audited Financial Statements of BRF as of December 31 st , 2024. ▪ Public information of BRF. ▪ Results spreadsheet extracted from the company's investor relations website. The professionals who participated in the preparation of this work are listed below : ▪ BRUNO GRAVINA BOTTINO – Director ▪ CAIO CESAR CAPELARI FAVERO – Director / Administrator and Accountant (CRA 141231 and CRC 1SP342654) ▪ DANIEL FELIX LAMONICA – Projects ▪ LEONARDO HENRIQUE CARDOSO BRAZ – Projects ▪ LUCAS ARAUJO DA SILVA CARDOZO – Projects ▪ MARCELO CAMPOS FARINHA – Projects ▪ RODRIGO MENNA BARRETO AMIL – Projects 5

2. PRINCIPLES AND CAVEATS The Report, the object of the work enumerated, calculated and particularized, carefully obeys the fundamental principles described below, which are important and should be carefully read. ▪ The consultants have no interest, direct or indirect, in the companies involved or in the transaction, and there is no other relevant circumstance that could characterize a conflict of interest. ▪ APSIS's professional fees are in no way subject to the findings of this Report. ▪ To the best knowledge and to the credit of the consultants, the analyses, opinions, and conclusions expressed in this Report are based on true and correct data, diligence, research and surveys. ▪ The information received from third parties is assumed to be correct, and their sources are contained and cited in the Report. ▪ For projection purposes, it is assumed that there are no encumbrances of any nature, judicial or extrajudicial, affecting the companies in question, other than those listed in this Report, if applicable. ▪ The Report presents all the limiting conditions imposed by the methodologies adopted, if any, that may affect the analyses, opinions and conclusions contained therein. ▪ The Report was prepared by APSIS, and no one, except its own consultants, prepared the analyses and corresponding conclusions. ▪ APSIS assumes full responsibility for the matter of Valuations, including implicit ones, for the exercise of its honorable functions, primarily established in its own laws, codes or regulations. ▪ This Report meets the recommendations and criteria established by the Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT), the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and the International Valuation Standards (IVS) . ▪ The controlling shareholder and the managers of the companies involved have not directed, limited, hindered or performed any acts that have or may have compromised the availability, use or knowledge of information, goods, documents or work methodologies relevant to the quality of the conclusions contained in this Report . ▪ The internal process of drafting and approving this document involved the following main steps : (I) analysis of the company's public documents ; (II) extraction, through the S&P Capital IQ Pro database, of quotations and historical volumes of the company's shares traded on the stock exchange or in the organized over - the - counter market ; (III) elaboration of calculations of the volume - weighted average price (VWAP) in different intervals ; (IV) preparation of the calculation of the company's equity value ; (V) submission of the report for independent internal review ; (V) implementation of any improvements and suggested changes ; (VI) issuance of a final report . 6

3. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY ▪ To prepare this Report, APSIS used and assumed as true and coherent information and historical data audited by third parties or not audited, provided in writing by the company's management or obtained from the aforementioned sources, and has no responsibility for their veracity . ▪ The scope of this valuation did not include an audit of the financial statements, or a review of the work carried out by its auditors . Accordingly, APSIS is not expressing an opinion on the Applicant's financial statements and measurements . ▪ APSIS is not responsible for occasional losses to the Requester and its subsidiaries, its partners, directors and creditors or other parties as a result of the use of the data and information provided by the company and contained in this Report . ▪ This Report was developed solely for the use of the Requester and its partners, aiming at the purpose already described ; therefore, it should not be published, circulated, reproduced, disseminated or used for any purpose other than the aforementioned one without the prior written approval of APSIS . ▪ The analyses and conclusions contained herein are based on several assumptions made on the present date, regarding operational projections, such as prices, volumes, market shares, revenues, taxes, investments, margins, etc . Thus, the company's future results may be different from any forecast or estimate of this work, especially if there is later knowledge of information not available at the time of the issuance of the Report . ▪ This assessment does not reflect events and impacts that occurred after the date of issuance of the Report . ▪ APSIS is not responsible for direct or indirect losses of profits that may arise from the improper use of this Report . ▪ We emphasize that understanding the conclusion of this Report will occur through the full reading of it and its annexes, and therefore no conclusions should be drawn from partial reading, which may be incorrect or mistaken . 7

4. BRF CHARACTERIZATION BRF is one of the world's largest producers of fresh and frozen animal protein, standing out for its extensive production capacity and a portfolio of more than 7 , 300 SKUs . Its products include marinated and frozen chicken, Chester® chicken, turkey meats, specialty meats, frozen processed meats, ready meals, fractionated items, as well as plant - based products . The company also sells margarine, butter, cottage cheese, special sweets, sandwiches, plant - based foods and animal feed . Owner of leading brands widely recognized by the public, such as Sadia, Perdigão and Qualy, BRF consolidated its position in the market from the merger between two traditional family businesses : Perdigão and Sadia . The union was announced in 2009 and completed in 2012 , marking the creation of one of the largest conglomerates in the food sector . Both companies already occupied prominent positions in the national and international market, with products exported to more than 120 countries . In the pet food segment, BRF has four manufacturing units, located in the states of São Paulo, Rio Grande do Sul, Paraná and also in Paraguay . Its portfolio includes brands such as Biofresh, Guabi Natural, Gran Plus, Balance, Three Dogs, Three Cats, PrimoCão, PrimoGato, Faro, Bônos, Apolo and Átila, serving different consumer profiles and their pets . BRF Operations With a 40.8% share of the Brazilian processed food market as of December 31, 2024, BRF maintains a solid structure consisting of 44 industrial units and 103 distribution centers. The company has a highly developed logistics system in the domestic market, supported by a vast distribution network that includes distribution centers and transit points. In 2024, this structure made it possible to serve approximately 415 thousand customers globally, with more than 500 thousand deliveries per month, according to MARFRIG's 2024 Reference Form. Complementing its operational efficiency, BRF invests in technology through a digital sales platform that suggests orders in a personalized way, based on the characteristics of each point of sale. Also, according to MAFRIG's Reference Form, the company demonstrated strong capillarity, with more than 300 thousand active customers in Brazil in June 2024. 8

5. VALUATION METHODOLOGY 1. MARKET APPROACH – LISTING ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE In this Report, we use the market approach, through the Volume - Weighted Average Price (VWAP), to determine the equity value of BRF . The methodology aims to appraise a company by the sum of all its shares at market prices . Because the price of a stock is defined by the present value of the future dividend stream and a sale price at the end of the period, at a required rate of return, under the Efficient Market Hypothesis, this approach would indicate the correct value of the company to investors, when not affected by factors such as the stock's liquidity in the market . 9

6. VALUATION THROUGH THE VOLUME - WEIGHTED AVERAGE PRICE OF SHARES ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE For the selection of the intervals considered in the VWAP calculation, we applied the criteria generally accepted in the market for operations of this nature, in line with the usual practices of the appraised company’s industry, and with parameters provided for in Article 256 of Law No . 6 , 404 / 76 (Brazilian Corporation Law) . The selection of these intervals was based on the representativeness and liquidity of the shares traded in the period, in order to faithfully reflect the market value of the company under normal trading conditions, mitigating any distortions . The following criteria were considered for the evaluation: ▪ The shares’ spot price on the last business day prior to the issuance of this Report. ▪ Volume - weighted average price of the shares traded on the stock exchange or in the organized over - the - counter market, during the 30 days immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of this Report. ▪ Volume - weighted average price of shares traded on the stock exchange or in the organized over - the - counter market, during the 90 days immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of this Report. ▪ Volume - weighted average price of shares traded on the stock exchange or in the organized over - the - counter market, during the 12 months immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of the Report. Note: any differences between valuation date and analyzed dates are due to market closures on the respective dates. The quotes and historical volumes used in the valuation were extracted from the S&P Capital IQ Pro database and can be seen in Annex 1. 10

Valuation date: 14/05/2025, approximate reference range. Source: Quotes and volumes extracted from the S&P Capital IQ Pro database. 11

VOLUME - WEIGHTED AVERAGE PRICE OF SHARES ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE SPOT VWAP 1 PERIOD DESCRIPTION REFERENCE 19.68 - - 20.74 14/05/2025 31/03/2025 - 14/05/2025 Share price on the last business day prior to the issuance of the report (spot) 30 days prior to the last business day before the issuance of the report n/a a - 20.52 02/01/2025 - 14/05/2025 90 days prior to the last business day before the issuance of the report b - 22.21 15/05/2024 - 14/05/2025 12 months prior to the last business day before the issuance of the report c 1. Volume - Weighted Average Price (VWAP) - Source data extracted from S&P Capital IQ Pro. Note: Eventual diferences between the base date and analyzed dates are due to market closures on the respective dates. Adopted methodology. 12

7. CONCLUSION In light of the analysis of the aforementioned documentation and based on the studies carried out by APSIS, the experts concluded that the most appropriate methodology for the valuation of BRF is the volume - weighted average price of the shares in the 90 days prior to the last business day before the issuance of the Report . This methodology covers the period closest to the signature of the report, offering a sufficiently large and representative sample, capable of diluting any specific distortions of price and volume . In addition, it complies with the parameters established in Article 256 of the Brazilian Corporation Law and in Annex C of CVM Resolution No . 85 / 22 . Thus, based on this methodology, the volume - weighted average price of BRF's shares is R $ 20 . 52 (twenty reais and fifty - two cents) per share, resulting in a total equity value of R $ 32 , 844 , 025 thousand (thirty - two billion, eight hundred and forty four million, twenty five thousand reais) . The appraisers concluded that the volume - weighted average price of the shares is the most appropriate criterion for determining the fair price of the company's shares . According to the appraiser’s understanding, all the methodologies considered are based on negotiations carried out between independent parties, knowledgeable about the business and free from pressure or interests unrelated to the essence of the transaction, being, due to these characteristics, classified as operations in conditions of independence (arm's length) . In addition, it should be noted that the methodology adopted for the preparation of this Report is in accordance with the highest level (Level 1 ) of the hierarchy of information for determining fair value, as provided for in CPC 46 , prioritizing the use of data considered the most reliable and observable for the purpose of measuring the value of the asset . 13 Director BRF'S EQUITY VALUE (BRL '000) PERIOD (mm/dd/yyyy) VALUATION BASED ON THE VOLUME - WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF PRICE OF SHARES ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE 20.52 02/01/2025 - 14/05/2025 VWAP on the 90 days immediately prior to the last business day before the issuance of the Report. (R$) 1,600,310,613 10/05/2025* Quantity of BRF common stock (shares)* 32,844,025 BRF'S EQUITY VALUE (BRL '000) *Source: BRF's Investor Relations website. Excluding Treasury Shares. Accessed on 15/05/2025. <https://ri.brf - global.com/en/corporate - gov ernance/shareholder - structure/> The Appraisal Report AP - 00521/25 - 01 was prepared by APSIS (CRC/RJ - 005112/O - 9), a company specialized in asset appraisal, legally represented below by its consultants, who are available for any clarifications that may be necessary. Rio de Janeiro, May 15 th , 2025.

8. LIST OF ANNEXES 1. Historical Quotes and Volumes 2. Glossary 14

ATTACHMENT 1

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) The table below presents BRF’s historical share prices and trading volumes used in the valuation methodology based on the volume - weighted average price of the shares. BRF’s closing share prices were obtained from the S&P Capital IQ Pro database. 1

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 11,292,700 19.68 14/05/2025 9,697,700 20.20 13/05/2025 8,375,400 19.71 12/05/2025 8,776,600 19.20 09/05/2025 8,273,200 20.39 08/05/2025 5,170,300 20.26 07/05/2025 10,499,200 20.35 06/05/2025 7,519,600 21.44 05/05/2025 5,563,100 22.46 02/05/2025 5,622,100 22.70 30/04/2025 6,045,700 22.75 29/04/2025 8,697,100 22.70 28/04/2025 10,862,300 22.90 25/04/2025 8,688,100 22.01 24/04/2025 7,533,300 21.49 23/04/2025 9,934,200 21.78 22/04/2025 7,661,400 21.15 17/04/2025 9,147,900 20.68 16/04/2025 4,400,300 20.67 15/04/2025 5,401,600 20.41 14/04/2025 4,913,400 20.54 11/04/2025 5,048,800 20.35 10/04/2025 9,422,800 20.56 09/04/2025 4,992,500 19.06 08/04/2025 6,937,400 19.20 07/04/2025 7,681,300 19.25 04/04/2025 4,804,700 19.64 03/04/2025 2

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 6,740,600 19.80 02/04/2025 6,581,100 20.14 01/04/2025 5,672,400 19.68 31/03/2025 6,184,600 19.71 28/03/2025 11,670,400 20.24 27/03/2025 5,613,100 19.72 26/03/2025 5,930,100 19.81 25/03/2025 4,771,600 19.42 24/03/2025 9,860,500 19.83 21/03/2025 9,504,900 19.82 20/03/2025 9,680,800 19.56 19/03/2025 10,726,200 19.64 18/03/2025 14,074,000 18.33 17/03/2025 8,474,800 18.11 14/03/2025 5,675,800 18.55 13/03/2025 7,296,900 19.09 12/03/2025 7,006,700 18.49 11/03/2025 5,548,600 18.88 10/03/2025 8,322,300 19.18 07/03/2025 10,560,500 18.50 06/03/2025 12,245,400 18.65 05/03/2025 14,580,500 17.93 28/02/2025 53,797,700 18.40 27/02/2025 9,129,500 19.01 26/02/2025 8,283,100 18.86 25/02/2025 5,179,400 18.70 24/02/2025 4,624,500 19.00 21/02/2025 3

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 6,125,100 18.73 20/02/2025 5,363,800 19.03 19/02/2025 6,461,900 19.19 18/02/2025 4,976,700 19.52 17/02/2025 13,397,400 20.02 14/02/2025 9,715,200 19.47 13/02/2025 6,770,400 20.23 12/02/2025 6,102,100 21.06 11/02/2025 5,257,500 21.35 10/02/2025 4,434,300 20.64 07/02/2025 3,974,100 21.17 06/02/2025 9,842,200 21.03 05/02/2025 10,860,200 20.79 04/02/2025 9,421,300 21.55 03/02/2025 5,447,300 21.89 31/01/2025 8,112,300 22.00 30/01/2025 4,066,700 22.03 29/01/2025 4,971,000 22.00 28/01/2025 5,518,200 22.33 27/01/2025 6,152,300 21.88 24/01/2025 11,017,200 21.75 23/01/2025 9,718,000 22.04 22/01/2025 26,287,100 21.75 21/01/2025 3,498,200 23.29 20/01/2025 6,836,500 22.78 17/01/2025 8,369,500 22.47 16/01/2025 5,863,200 24.15 15/01/2025 4

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 10,105,800 23.77 14/01/2025 5,086,700 23.55 13/01/2025 13,227,300 23.52 10/01/2025 6,033,000 23.48 09/01/2025 4,887,100 23.25 08/01/2025 6,581,800 23.72 07/01/2025 4,495,800 23.81 06/01/2025 5,513,800 24.01 03/01/2025 6,804,600 24.80 02/01/2025 8,146,700 25.36 30/12/2024 7,576,700 24.80 27/12/2024 6,751,600 25.47 26/12/2024 4,249,000 26.03 23/12/2024 18,188,500 26.35 20/12/2024 9,288,500 26.27 19/12/2024 17,929,400 26.54 18/12/2024 8,836,200 28.33 17/12/2024 7,694,300 28.35 16/12/2024 6,613,100 27.79 13/12/2024 6,071,100 27.82 12/12/2024 9,386,100 28.38 11/12/2024 7,432,100 27.75 10/12/2024 8,227,600 28.69 09/12/2024 8,692,300 28.32 06/12/2024 9,296,800 28.29 05/12/2024 14,262,500 27.80 04/12/2024 15,433,700 26.33 03/12/2024 5

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 6,826,000 25.20 02/12/2024 6,857,300 24.81 29/11/2024 5,711,000 24.41 28/11/2024 6,949,500 24.59 27/11/2024 6,556,100 24.38 26/11/2024 16,504,500 25.45 25/11/2024 7,896,600 25.21 22/11/2024 11,804,600 25.21 21/11/2024 19,692,600 24.41 19/11/2024 16,303,800 23.53 18/11/2024 34,538,600 24.95 14/11/2024 6,380,900 24.94 13/11/2024 6,274,800 24.97 12/11/2024 5,377,700 24.21 11/11/2024 5,873,800 24.10 08/11/2024 9,452,600 24.64 07/11/2024 7,287,600 25.98 06/11/2024 3,762,300 25.80 05/11/2024 7,332,000 26.01 04/11/2024 4,976,100 25.82 01/11/2024 15,821,300 26.23 31/10/2024 4,823,400 25.50 30/10/2024 6,649,300 25.52 29/10/2024 11,117,200 25.56 28/10/2024 6,728,800 24.41 25/10/2024 7,512,500 24.43 24/10/2024 6,908,800 24.35 23/10/2024 6

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 4,770,200 24.26 22/10/2024 9,721,800 24.32 21/10/2024 9,099,400 24.35 18/10/2024 8,548,700 23.89 17/10/2024 4,342,700 23.27 16/10/2024 3,970,900 23.30 15/10/2024 2,719,600 22.96 14/10/2024 4,943,200 22.77 11/10/2024 6,396,700 23.08 10/10/2024 5,065,000 22.62 09/10/2024 3,557,200 23.19 08/10/2024 5,040,800 22.88 07/10/2024 4,093,600 23.35 04/10/2024 5,828,200 23.74 03/10/2024 6,826,500 23.86 02/10/2024 5,891,100 24.28 01/10/2024 5,461,300 23.65 30/09/2024 3,950,400 24.26 27/09/2024 5,251,600 24.64 26/09/2024 5,044,500 25.27 25/09/2024 4,939,300 24.68 24/09/2024 4,190,500 24.83 23/09/2024 11,168,300 25.12 20/09/2024 9,942,500 25.05 19/09/2024 5,953,300 24.04 18/09/2024 4,356,400 25.01 17/09/2024 6,556,400 25.00 16/09/2024 7

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 9,828,700 24.67 13/09/2024 4,497,000 24.34 12/09/2024 5,519,900 23.97 11/09/2024 3,447,000 24.63 10/09/2024 5,969,300 24.51 09/09/2024 4,729,100 25.21 06/09/2024 4,201,400 25.41 05/09/2024 8,533,600 25.50 04/09/2024 6,204,400 24.47 03/09/2024 6,549,300 24.65 02/09/2024 8,844,900 26.23 30/08/2024 6,377,600 25.80 29/08/2024 5,569,000 26.03 28/08/2024 7,941,100 25.91 27/08/2024 6,321,400 25.30 26/08/2024 9,251,400 25.19 23/08/2024 5,239,400 25.71 22/08/2024 5,939,100 26.03 21/08/2024 8,272,700 25.40 20/08/2024 9,995,300 25.25 19/08/2024 8,933,300 24.30 16/08/2024 23,569,000 23.91 15/08/2024 11,645,800 23.51 14/08/2024 6,693,300 22.45 13/08/2024 4,458,200 21.85 12/08/2024 4,438,300 21.93 09/08/2024 3,949,400 21.54 08/08/2024 8

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 3,533,900 20.90 07/08/2024 5,156,300 20.79 06/08/2024 4,620,200 20.68 05/08/2024 4,368,200 20.95 02/08/2024 5,488,600 21.37 01/08/2024 5,240,300 21.06 31/07/2024 11,664,900 21.32 30/07/2024 5,043,700 21.32 29/07/2024 6,957,300 21.59 26/07/2024 4,545,900 21.05 25/07/2024 3,459,800 20.80 24/07/2024 4,999,700 20.94 23/07/2024 4,914,800 21.10 22/07/2024 12,480,400 20.99 19/07/2024 14,977,400 20.81 18/07/2024 3,128,700 22.59 17/07/2024 3,547,000 22.52 16/07/2024 3,119,400 22.50 15/07/2024 4,555,900 22.46 12/07/2024 5,194,400 21.96 11/07/2024 7,390,600 21.93 10/07/2024 4,673,800 22.15 09/07/2024 3,998,200 22.78 08/07/2024 3,996,400 22.83 05/07/2024 4,412,000 22.90 04/07/2024 7,568,700 22.75 03/07/2024 7,712,500 23.61 02/07/2024 9

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 6,739,100 23.02 01/07/2024 10,608,800 22.67 28/06/2024 9,507,500 22.05 27/06/2024 7,054,400 21.10 26/06/2024 8,574,300 20.80 25/06/2024 8,893,500 20.73 24/06/2024 11,519,600 20.55 21/06/2024 8,194,200 20.31 20/06/2024 14,485,300 20.02 19/06/2024 11,320,100 19.19 18/06/2024 5,231,100 18.19 17/06/2024 3,636,500 18.63 14/06/2024 4,509,800 18.60 13/06/2024 7,771,000 18.78 12/06/2024 8,410,000 19.00 11/06/2024 8,065,800 18.39 10/06/2024 7,650,300 18.33 07/06/2024 7,589,300 18.44 06/06/2024 6,987,800 18.32 05/06/2024 11,507,800 18.05 04/06/2024 4,340,600 18.71 03/06/2024 72,717,900 18.58 31/05/2024 7,761,000 19.04 29/05/2024 8,697,600 19.14 28/05/2024 4,450,400 19.33 27/05/2024 8,110,200 19.08 24/05/2024 7,707,400 19.23 23/05/2024 10

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 10,726,500 19.21 22/05/2024 10,154,300 19.61 21/05/2024 12,524,200 19.65 20/05/2024 11,293,800 19.36 17/05/2024 13,615,600 19.15 16/05/2024 11,281,200 18.54 15/05/2024 5,259,900 18.29 14/05/2024 10,690,200 18.13 13/05/2024 19,010,800 18.32 10/05/2024 13,316,300 18.91 09/05/2024 35,456,700 18.51 08/05/2024 16,033,100 16.65 07/05/2024 18,787,700 16.18 06/05/2024 32,361,200 16.72 03/05/2024 10,899,000 16.71 02/05/2024 6,185,900 16.88 30/04/2024 7,512,000 17.24 29/04/2024 4,845,500 17.45 26/04/2024 6,938,700 17.27 25/04/2024 7,749,900 17.19 24/04/2024 8,382,200 17.37 23/04/2024 7,042,300 17.16 22/04/2024 8,568,100 17.05 19/04/2024 8,810,400 17.05 18/04/2024 12,181,500 17.07 17/04/2024 10,694,400 17.78 16/04/2024 24,298,300 17.90 15/04/2024 11

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 12,563,000 16.25 12/04/2024 7,628,100 16.90 11/04/2024 9,299,300 16.88 10/04/2024 7,907,800 17.26 09/04/2024 5,406,700 16.79 08/04/2024 7,626,600 16.17 05/04/2024 7,905,700 15.97 04/04/2024 5,746,000 16.02 03/04/2024 6,456,200 15.97 02/04/2024 5,681,400 16.00 01/04/2024 7,129,400 16.32 28/03/2024 7,243,600 15.78 27/03/2024 5,487,400 15.97 26/03/2024 4,347,600 16.28 25/03/2024 7,174,700 16.30 22/03/2024 5,235,400 16.67 21/03/2024 6,509,700 16.82 20/03/2024 10,248,300 16.76 19/03/2024 8,946,600 16.34 18/03/2024 31,237,800 16.46 15/03/2024 7,253,400 17.28 14/03/2024 6,867,900 16.99 13/03/2024 9,693,900 17.02 12/03/2024 5,780,300 16.61 11/03/2024 8,077,100 16.70 08/03/2024 7,622,400 16.38 07/03/2024 8,989,400 16.14 06/03/2024 12

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 12,240,500 15.94 05/03/2024 10,251,100 15.30 04/03/2024 8,196,500 14.87 01/03/2024 11,784,200 15.10 29/02/2024 17,851,400 15.21 28/02/2024 33,280,800 15.15 27/02/2024 14,325,100 14.01 26/02/2024 8,875,800 13.50 23/02/2024 6,218,900 13.86 22/02/2024 8,619,800 13.93 21/02/2024 5,578,100 13.91 20/02/2024 2,522,700 14.15 19/02/2024 4,702,500 14.29 16/02/2024 6,119,600 14.33 15/02/2024 4,382,500 14.18 14/02/2024 4,407,200 14.48 09/02/2024 5,756,900 14.54 08/02/2024 4,868,700 14.81 07/02/2024 5,162,600 14.85 06/02/2024 4,632,400 14.49 05/02/2024 6,263,500 14.33 02/02/2024 7,867,500 14.33 01/02/2024 10,045,800 13.95 31/01/2024 5,755,500 13.75 30/01/2024 4,050,400 14.26 29/01/2024 6,917,600 14.61 26/01/2024 4,709,900 14.47 25/01/2024 13

HISTORICAL SHARE PRICES AND TRANSACTION VOLUMES - BRF (BRFS3) VOLUME TRADED (NUMBER OF SHARES) (BRFS3) CLOSING PRICE (R$) (BRFS3) DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) 9,424,500 14.15 24/01/2024 13,523,900 14.61 23/01/2024 18,872,500 13.64 22/01/2024 10,529,700 13.00 19/01/2024 7,574,600 12.41 18/01/2024 10,201,600 12.57 17/01/2024 12,673,700 13.03 16/01/2024 3,193,000 13.13 15/01/2024 9,557,600 12.87 12/01/2024 6,377,600 12.50 11/01/2024 6,899,200 12.68 10/01/2024 6,912,300 12.72 09/01/2024 8,423,800 12.70 08/01/2024 6,854,400 12.76 05/01/2024 9,288,200 12.57 04/01/2024 12,394,100 12.60 03/01/2024 6,509,100 13.25 02/01/2024 14 Source: S&P Capital IQ Pro.

ATTACHMENT 2

Cash Flow on Invested Capital Cash flow generated by the company to be reverted to lenders (interest and amortizations) and shareholders (dividends) after consideration of cost and operating expenses and capital investments. Cash - Generating Unit Smallest identifiable group of assets generating cash inflows that are largely independent on inputs generated by other assets or groups of assets. Casualty An event that causes financial loss. CFC (Conselho Federal de Contabilidade) Brazilian Accounting Committee. Company Commercial or industrial entity, service provider or investment entity holding economic activities. Conservation Status Physical status of an asset asa result of its maintenance. Control Power to direct the strategic policy and administrative management of a company. Control Premium Value or percentage of the pro - rata value of a lot of controlling shares over the pro - rata value of noncontrolling shares, which reflect the control power. Cost Thetotal direct and indirect costs necessary for production, maintenance or acquisition of an assetat aparticular time and situation. GLOSSARY Asset Approach Valuation of companies where all assets (including those not accounted for) have their values adjusted to the market . Also known as market net equity . B Basic Infrastructure Urban rainwater drainage equipment, street lighting, sewage system, drinking water, public and home electricity supply and access routes. BDI (Budget Difference Income) A percentage that indicates the benefits and overhead costs applied to the direct cost of construction. Best Use of the Property Themost economically appropriate use of a certain property according to its characteristics and surroundings, respecting legal limitations. Beta A systematic risk measure of a share; price trend of a particular share to be correlated with changes in a given index. Book Value The value at which an asset or liability is recognized on the balance sheet. Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) The BOMA Standard measures buildings on a buildingwide basis. It introduces the concept of Building Common Area (areas common to all of the tenants in a building). Building Standard The quality of the improvements according to the specifications of design, materials, workmanship and performance effectively used in construction. Business Combination Union of separate entities or businesses producing financial statements of a single reporting entity. Transaction or other event by which an acquirer obtains control of one or more businesses, regardless of the legal form of operation. Business Risk Uncertainty of realization of expected future returns of the business resulting from factors other than financial leverage. C CAPEX(Capital Expenditure) Fixed asset investments. CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing Model) Model in which the capital cost for any share or lot of shares equals the risk free rate plus risk premium provided by the systematic risk of the share or lot of shares under investigation. Generally used to calculate the Cost of Equity or the Cost of Shareholder Capital. Capital Structure Composition of a company’s invested capital, between own capital (equity) and third - party capital (debt). Cash Flow Cashgenerated by an asset, group of assets or business during a given period of time. Usually the term is supplemented by a qualification referring to the context (operating, nonoperating, etc.) A ABL Gross Leasable Area. ABNT (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas) Brazilian Technical Standards Association. Allocated Codes Serial number (grades or weights) to differentiate the quality features of properties. Allotment Subdivision of a tract of land into lots for buildings with the opening of new thoroughfares, or the extension, modification or expansion of existing ones. Amortization Systematic allocation of the depreciable value of an asset over its useful life. Apparent Age Estimated age of a property according to its characteristic and conservation status at the time of inspection. Asset Aresource controlled by the entity asa result of past events from which future economic benefits are expected for the entity. 1

Cost of Capital Expected rate of return required by the market as an attraction to certain investment funds. 2 CPC (Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis) Accounting Pronouncements Committee. Current Value Value replacement with a new value depreciated as a result of the physical state the property is in. CVM Securities and Exchange Commission. D Data Treatment Application of operations to express, in relative terms, the attribute differences between the market data and data of the property being assessed. Date of Issue Closing date of the valuation report, when conclusions are conveyed to the client. DCF (Discounted Cash Flow) Discounted cash flow. D&A Depreciation and amortization. Dependent Variable Variable to be explained by the independent ones. . Depreciable Value Cost of the asset, or other amount that substitutes such cost (financial statements), less its residual value. Depreciation Systematic allocation of the depreciable value of an asset during its useful life. Dichotomous Variable Variable that assumes only two values. Direct Production Cost Spending on inputs, including labor, in the production of goods. Discount Rate Any divisor used to convert a flow of future economic benefits into present value. E EBIT (Earnings before Interest and Taxes) Earnings before interest and taxes. EBITDA (Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Economic Benefits Benefits such as revenue, net profit, net cash flow, etc. Efficient Use That which is recommendable and technically possible for the location on a reference date, among the various uses permitted by the applicable law, observing surrounding marketing trends. Electrical Damage Value Estimated cost of the repair or replacement of parts, when the property suffers electrical damage. Values are tabulated in percentages of the Replacement Value and have been calculated through the study of equipment manuals and the expertise in corrective maintenance of Apsis technicians. Enterprise Setof properties capable of producing revenue through marketing or economicexploitation. It can be: real estate (e.g. subdivision, commercial/ residential buildings), real - estate based (e.g., hotel, shopping mall, themeparks), industrial or rural. Enterprise Value Economic value of the company. Equity Value Economic value of the equity. Equivalent Construction Area Constructed area on which the unit cost equivalence of corresponding construction is applied, according to ABNT postulates. Equivalent Depth Numerical result of the division of a lot area by its main projected front. Expertise Technical activity performed by a professional with specific expertise to investigate and clarify facts, check the status of property, investigate the causes that motivated a particular event, appraise assets, their costs, results or rights. F Facilities Set of materials, systems, networks, equipment and operational support services for a single machine, production line or plant, according to the degree of aggregation. Fair Market Value Value at which an asset could have its ownership exchanged between a potential seller and a potential buyer, when both parties have reasonable knowledge of relevant facts and neither is under pressure to do so. Fair Value Less Cost to Sell Value that can be obtained from the sale of an asset or cash - generating unit less sale expenses, in a transaction between knowledgeable, willing and uninterested parties. FCFF (Free Cash Flow to Firm) Freecash flow to firm, or unlevered free cash flow. Financial Lease That which substantially transfers all the risks and benefits related to the ownership of the asset, which may or may not eventually be transferred. Leases that are not financial leases are classified as operating leases. Fixed Asset Tangible asset available for use in the production or supply of goodsor services, in third - party leasing, investments, or for management purposes, expected to be used for more than one accounting period.

Forced Liquidation Conditiononthepossibility ofacompulsorysaleorinashorter period than theaverageabsorptionbythemarket. 3 G Goodwill See Premium for Expected Future Profitability. H Homogenization Treatment of observed prices by application of mathematical transformations that express, in relative terms, the differences between market data attributes and those of the property assessed. Homogenization Area Useful or private area, or built with mathematical treatments for valuation purposes, according to criteria based on the real estate market. I IAS (International Accounting Standards) Principles - based standards, interpretations and the framework adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). See International Accounting Standards. IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) International Accounting Standards Board. Standard setting body responsible for the development of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). Ideal Fraction Percentage owned by each of the buyers (tenants) of the land IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) International Financial Reporting Standards, a set of international accounting pronouncements published and reviewed by the IASB. IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) International Financial Reporting Standards, a set of international accounting pronouncements published and reviewed by the IASB. Impairment See Impairment losses. Impairment Losses(impairment) Book value of the asset that exceeds, in the case of stocks, its selling price less the cost to complete it and expenseof selling it; or, in the caseof other assets, their fair value less expenditure for sale. Income Approach Valuation method for converting the present value of expected economic benefits. Independent Variables Variables that provide a logical content to the formation of the value of the property subject to the assessment. Indirect Production Cost Administrative and financial costs, benefits and other liens and charges necessary for the production of goods. party undertakes, subject to payment of premium, to indemnify another for the occurrence of casualties covered under the policy. Insurance Investment Property Risk transfer guaranteed by contract whereby one Property (land, building or building part, or both) Insurance Value Value at which an insurance company assumes the risks. Except in special cases, it is not applied to land and foundations. Intangible Asset Identifiable non - monetary asset without physical substance. This asset is identifiable when: a) it is separable, i.e., capable of being separated or divided from the entity and sold, transferred, licensed, leased or exchanged, either alone or together with the related contract, asset or liability; b) it arises from contractual or other legal rights, regardless of whether those rights are transferable or separable from the entity or from other rights and obligations. Internal Rate of Return Discount rate where the present value of future cash flow is equivalent to the cost of investment . International Accounting Standards (IAS) Standards and interpretations adopted by the IASB. They include: International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) International Accounting Standards (IAS) and interpretations developed by the Interpretation Committee on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRIC) or by the former Standing Interpretations Committee (SIC). held by the owner or lessee under the lease, both to receive payment of rent and for capital appreciation or both, other than for use in the production or supply of goods or services, as well as for administrative purposes. Investment Value Value for a particular investor based on individual interests in the property in question. In the case of business valuation, this value can be analyzed by different situations, such as the synergy with other companies of an investor, risk perceptions, future performance and tax planning. IVSC International Valuation Standards Council. K Key Money Amount paid by the prospective tenant for signature or transfer of the lease contract, as compensation for the point of sale. Key Variables Variables that, a priori, and traditionally have been important for the formation of property value. L Levered Beta Beta value reflecting the debt in capital structure.

Liability Present obligation that arises from past events, whereby it is hoped that the settlement thereof will result in the inflow of funds from the entity embodying economic benefits. 4 Liquidity Ability to rapidly convert certain assets into cash or into the payment of a certain debt. M Market Approach Valuation method in which multiple comparisons derived from the sales price of similar assets are adopted. Market Data Set of information collected on the market related to a particular property. Market Research Set of activities for identification, investigation, collection, selection, processing, analysis and interpretation of results on market data. Marketing Factor The ratio between the market value of an asset and its reproduction cost less depreciation or replacement cost, which may be higher or lower than 1 (one). Maximum Insurance Value Maximum value of the property for which it is recommendable to insure it. This criterion establishes that the property whose depreciation is greater than 50% should have its Maximum Insurance. Value equivalent to twice as much as the Current Value; and the property whose depreciation is with less than 50% should have its Maximum Insurance Value equivalent to the Replacement Value. Multiple Market value of a company, share or invested capital, divided by a valuation measurement of the company (EBITDA, income, customer volume, etc.). N Net Debt Cash and cash equivalents, net position in derivatives, short - term and long - term financial debts, dividends receivable and payable, receivables and payables related to debentures, short - term and long - term deficits with pension funds, provisions, and other credits and obligations to related parties, including subscription bonus. Non - Operating Assets Those not directly related to the company’s operations (may or may not generate revenue) and that can be disposed of without detriment to its business. O Operating Assets Assets that are basic to the company’s operations. Operating Lease That which does not substantially transfer all the risks and benefits incidental to the ownership of the asset. Leases that are not operating leases are classified as financial leases. P Parent Company An entity that has one or more subsidiaries. Percentual Value Value at the end of the projective period to be added on the cash flow. Point of Sale Intangible asset that adds value to commercial property, due to its location and expected commercial exploitation. Population Total market data of the segment to be analyzed. Premium for Expected Future Profitability (goodwill) Future economic benefits arising from assets not capable of being individually identified or separately recognized . Present Value The estimated present value of discounted net cash flows in the normal course of business. Price The amount by which a transaction is performed involving a property, a product or the right thereto. Private Area Useful area plus building blocks (such as walls, pillars, etc.) and elevator hallway (in specific cases). Property Something of value, subject to use, or that may be the object of a right, which integrates an equity. Q Qualitative Variables Variables that cannot be measured or counted, only ordered or ranked, according to attributes inherent to the property (e . g . , building standard, conservation status and quality of the soil) . Quantitative Variables Variables that can be measured or counted (e.g., private area, number of bedrooms and parking spaces). R Range for Real Estate Valuations Rangein the vicinity of the point estimator adopted in the valuation within which to arbitrate the value of the property, provided it is justified by the existence of features that are not contemplated in the model. Rd (Cost of Debt) A measure of the amount paid for the capital earned from third parties, in the form of loans, financing, market funding, among others. Re (Cost of Equity) Return required by shareholders for the capital invested. Real Estate Property, consisting of land and any improvements incorporated thereto . Can be classified as urban or rural, depending on its location, use or to its highest and best use .

Recoverable Value The highest fair value of an asset (or cashgenerating unit) minus the cost of sales compared with its value in use. 5 Reference Real Estate Market data with features comparable to the property assessed. Regression Model The model used to represent a specific phenomenon, based on a sample, considering the various influencing characteristics. Remaining Life A property’s remaining life. Replacement Cost A property’s reproduction cost less depreciation, with the same function and features comparable to the property assessed. Replacement Value for New Value based on what the property would cost (usually in relation to current market prices) to be replaced with or substituted by a new, equal or similar property. Reproduction Cost Expense required for the exact duplication of a property, regardless of any depreciation. Reproduction Cost Less Depreciation A property’s reproduction cost less depreciation, considering the state it is in. Residual Value Value of new or used asset projected for a date limited to that in which it becomes scrap, considering its being in operation during the period. Residual Value of an Asset Estimated value that the entity would obtain at present with the sale of the asset, after deducting the estimated costs thereof, if the asset were already at the expected age and condition at the end of its useful life . S Sample Set of market data representative of a population. Scrap Value Market value of a property’s reusable materials in disabling conditions, without their being used for production purposes . Shareholders’ Equity at Market Prices See Assets Approach. Statistical Inference Part of statistical science that allows drawing conclusions about the population from a sample. Subsidiary Entity, including that with no legal character, such as an association, controlled by another entity (known as the parent company). Supporting Documentation Documentation raised and provided by the client on which the report premises are based. Survey Evidence of local events through insightful observations in a property and of the factors and conditions that constitute or influence it. T Tangible Asset Physically existing asset, such as land, building, machinery, equipment, furniture and tools. Technical Report Detailed report or technical clarification issued by a legally qualified and trained professional on a specific subject. Technical Term of Responsibility Required document, which defines the responsible engineer for a product or service. Total Construction Area Resulting from the sum of the real private area and the common area allocated to an independent unit, defined according to ABNT. U Urbanizable Land Land eligible to receive urban infrastructure works aiming at its efficient use, by means of the subdivision, split or implementation of a business. Useful Area Real private area subtracted from the area occupied by walls and other building blocks that prevent or hinder its use. Useful Economic Life The period in which an asset is expected to be available for use, or the number of production or similar units expected to be obtained from the asset by the entity. V Valuation Act or process of determining the value of an asset. Valuation Date Specific date (day, month and year) of application of the assessment value. Valuation Methodology One or more approaches used in developing evaluative calculations for the indication of the value of an asset. Value at Risk Representative value of the share of the property one wishes to insure and that may correspond to the maximum insurable value . Value in Use Value of a property in operating conditions in its present state, such as the useful part of an industry, including, where relevant, the costs of design, packaging, taxes, freight and installation.

Value of a business in forced liquidation Value of a property offered for sale on the market outside the normal process, i.e. one that would be established if the property were offered for sale separately, taking into account the costs involved and the discount required for a sale in a reduced period. Value of a business in immediate liquidation The compulsory liquidation refers to a business forced into liquidation by way of a winding - up petition presented to the court. More aggressive than forced liquidation. Value Plan The graphic representation or listing of generic square meter values of land or of the real estate on the same date. W WACC WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital) Model in which capital cost is determined by the weighted average of the market value of capital structure components (own and others). WARA Weighted Average Return on Assets (WARA), Weighted average rate of return expected for the assets and liabilities that make up the company under analysis, including goodwill. 6

1 Rio de Janeiro +55 21 2212 - 6850 apsis.rj@apsis.com.br São Paulo 55 11 4550 - 2701 apsis.sp@apsis.com.br Minas Gerais +55 31 98299 - 6678 apsis.mg@apsis.com.br apsis.com.br

Annex 4.5

264 Appraisal Report

(This annex begins on the following page.)

(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.)

APPRAISAL REPORT AP - 00475/25 - 01 Marfrig Global Foods S.A. BRF S.A.

APPRAISAL REPORT: AP - 00475/25 - 01 VALUATION DATE: December 31 st , 2024 1 REQUESTER: MARFRIG GLOBAL FOODS S.A., hereinafter referred to as MARFRIG. Publicly held corporation, headquartered at Av. Queiroz Filho, No. 1.560, Bloco 5, Sabiá Tower, 3 rd Floor, Room 301, Vila Hamburguesa, City and State of São Paulo, registered with the CNPJ under No. 03.853.896/0001 - 40. OBJECTS: MARFRIG, previously qualified, and BRF S.A., hereinafter referred to as BRF. Publicly held corporation, headquartered at Rua Jorge Tzachel, No. 475, Fazenda, City of Itajaí, State of Santa Catarina, registered with the CNPJ under No. 01.838.723/0001 - 27. OBJECTIVE: Calculation of the value of MARFRIG and BRF shares using the Adjusted Net Asset Method, based on the same criteria and on the same date, for the purpose of complying with article 264 of Law No. 6,404 (Brazilian Corporation Law).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APSIS CONSULTORIA E AVALIAÇÕES LTDA . , hereinafter referred to as APSIS, was appointed by MARFRIG to determine the share exchange ratio of MARFRIG and BRF, based on the Adjusted Net Asset method, according to the same criteria and on the same dates, of both companies, in compliance with article 264 of Law No . 6 , 040 / 76 . MARFRIG intends to carry out a corporate reorganization, which will consist of the merger of BRF shares . As this is a transaction involving controlling and controlled companies, it is necessary to calculate the exchange ratio of the shares of the subsidiary’s non - controlling shareholders based on the shareholders' equity value of the shares of the parent company and the subsidiary, valuing the two assets according to the same criteria and on the same date, at market prices, to comply with article 264 of the Brazilian Corporation Law . The technical procedures used in this Report are in accordance with the criteria established by valuation standards . The Adjusted Net Asset Value methodology is based on the analysis of the assets and liabilities recorded in the company's balance sheet, adjusted to the amount that a potential market participant would pay to obtain such assets or assume such liabilities . 2

SUMMARY OF RESULTS (ADJUSTED NET ASSET METHOD) ▪ MARFRIG (pro forma balance sheet) The Balance Sheet below presents the reconciliation, made available by MARFRIG's management, between MARFRIG's consolidated accounting balances as of December 31 st , 2024 (see December 31 st , 2024 Financial Statements available on MARFRIG's IR website) and the balances used in the Pro Forma Balance Sheet to carry out the valuation . The adjustments consisted of reversing the consolidation of BRF in MARFRIG, followed by the recognition of BRF using the equity method (MEP) . These adjustments aim to isolate the effects of the investee in the consolidated financial statements, enabling the identification and measurement of the fair value adjustment (step up and down) to determine the net equity value, for the purpose of determining the share exchange ratio in the context of the corporate transaction . 3

ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED ADJUSTMENTS – MARFRIG ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – CONSOLIDATED MARFRIG BALANCE SHEET (BRL '000) AS OF DEC 2024 AS OF DEC 2024 AS OF DEC 2024 24,193,465 (30,741,201) 54,934,666 CURRENT ASSETS 3,132,017 (1,384,670) 4,516,687 Cash and cash equivalents 7,328,054 (10,674,774) 18,002,828 Short - term Investments 3,190,093 (5,985,721) 9,175,814 Accounts Receivable from Customers 4,754,934 (6,728,004) 11,482,938 Inventories of Products and Goods 81,788 (2,844,633) 2,926,421 Biological Assets 1,021,136 (2,214,189) 3,235,325 & R e c o v e r ab l e Taxes 249,540 (176,290) 425,830 Prepaid Expenses 27,150 (32,302) 59,452 Receivables from Securities 2,705,326 (34,076) 2,739,402 Advances to Suppliers 1,422,058 - 1,422,058 & A s s e t s Held for Sale 21,936 (63,033) 84,969 Derivative Financial Instruments - (851) 851 Dividends Receivable - (276,025) 276,025 Restricted Cash 259,433 (326,633) 586,066 Other Receivables 38,021,788 (44,553,687) 82,575,473 NON - CURRENT ASSETS 8,814,149 (13,162,635) 21,976,784 LONG - TERM RECEIVABLES - (323,811) 323,811 Financial Investments and Marketable Securities - (22,620) 22,620 & T r ad e Receivables 65,168 (422,333) 487,501 Judicial Deposits 5,596,057 (4,545,441) 10,141,498 Recoverable Taxes 600 (8,035) 8,635 Receivables from Securities - (60,790) 60,790 Restricted Cash 2,145,943 (2,331,012) 4,476,955 Deferred Income Tax and Social Contribution 12 (251,570) 251,582 Derivative Financial Instruments 28,984 (221,015) 249,999 Other Receivables - (1,787,237) 1,787,237 Biological Assets 116,794 - 116,794 Investment Properties 860,591 (3,188,771) 4,049,362 Right - of - Use Asset 13,322,664 13,097,821 224,843 INVESTMENTS 9,895,617 (31,350,498) 41,246,113 FIXED ASSETS 5,989,358 (13,138,375) 19,127,733 INTANGIBLE ASSETS 62,215,253 (75,294,888) 137,510,139 TOTAL ASSETS 4

ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED ADJUSTMENTS – MARFRIG ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – CONSOLIDATED MARFRIG BALANCE SHEET (BRL '000) AS OF DEC 2024 AS OF DEC 2024 AS OF DEC 2024 22,289,358 (20,676,417) 42,965,775 CURRENT LIABILITIES 6,792,852 (13,468,993) 20,261,845 Suppliers 699,564 (1,652,329) 2,351,893 Labor liabilities 94,718 (1,141,943) 1,236,661 Tax liabilities 7,177,442 (1,175,409) 8,352,851 Loans, Financing and Debentures 2,547 (218,106) 220,653 Payables from Securities 189,653 (1,014,813) 1,204,466 Lease Liabilities 5,613,410 (475,650) 6,089,060 Advances from Customers 767,344 - 767,344 & L i ab ili t i es Related to Assets Held for Sale 91,646 (692,650) 784,296 Provision for Contingencies 67,969 (382,976) 450,945 & D e r i v a t i v e Financial Instruments 1,106 (1,686) 2,792 Dividends Payable 791,107 (451,862) 1,242,969 Other Liabilities 36,409,929 (38,196,322) 74,606,252 NON - CURRENT LIABILITIES 36,409,929 (38,196,322) 74,606,252 LONG - TERM PAYABLES 33,679,605 (19,091,175) 52,770,780 Loans, Financing and Debentures 180,448 (77,854) 258,302 Tax liabilities 193,270 (8,562,677) 8,755,947 Deferred Income Tax and Social Contribution* 368,573 (6,238,842) 6,607,415 Provision for Contingencies 713,618 (2,978,116) 3,691,734 Lease Liabilities - (39,156) 39,156 Payables from Securities - (11,767) 11,767 Suppliers - (467,127) 467,127 Labor liabilities 1,179,321 (236,206) 1,415,527 & D e r i v a t i v e Financial Instruments 95,094 (493,402) 588,497 Other Liabilities 3,515,963 (16,422,149) 19,938,112 SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY 10,367,391 - 10,367,391 Share Capital (3,524,168) (1,382,732) (2,141,436) Capital Reserve and Treasury Shares 624,664 - 624,664 Legal Reserve 964,286 - 964,286 Tax Incentive Reserve 2,637,330 - 2,637,330 Retained Earnings Reserve (9,252,605) 375,486 (9,628,091) Other Comprehensive Results 1,699,065 (15,414,903) 17,113,968 Non - controlling Interests - - Market adjustments 62,215,251 (75,294,888) 137,510,139 TOTAL LIABILITIES 5 1,816,898 (1,007,246) 2,824,144 SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY - CONTROLLING (BRL '000) * BRF’s Shareholders’ Equity at Market Value is already net of deferred income tax on the fair value adjustments recognized in the balance sheet

▪ MARFRIG (Balance Sheet at Market Value) The following table presents MARFRIG's Shareholders’ Equity at Market Value, based on the pro - forma view mentioned above, and the effect of the fair value adjustments arising from the market valuation of the accounting balances presented, explained in detail throughout this report. 6

ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – PRO FORMA MARKET VALUE ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – PRO FORMA MARFRIG BALANCE SHEET (BRL '000) AS OF DEC 2024 ADJUSTMENTS AS OF DEC 2024 24,314,424.0 120,958.8 24,193,465.1 CURRENT ASSETS 3,132,017.0 - 3,132,017.0 Cash and cash equivalents 7,328,054.0 - 7,328,054.0 Short - term Investments 3,190,093.0 3,190,093.0 Accounts Receivable from Customers 4,855,606.8 100,672.8 4,754,934.0 Inventories of Products and Goods 81,788.0 81,788.0 Biological Assets 1,021,136.0 1,021,136.0 & R e c o v e r ab l e Taxes 249,540.0 249,540.0 Prepaid Expenses 27,150.0 27,150.0 Receivables from Securities 2,705,326.0 - 2,705,326.0 Advances to Suppliers 1,442,344.0 20,286.0 1,422,058.0 &Assets Held for Sale 21,936.0 - 21,936.0 Derivative Financial Instruments 259,433.1 - 259,433.1 Other Receivables 46,350,695.9 8,328,908.2 38,021,787.7 NON - CURRENT ASSETS 8,814,148.9 - 8,814,148.9 LONG - TERM RECEIVABLES 65,168.0 65,168.0 Judicial Deposits 5,596,057.0 5,596,057.0 Recoverable Taxes 600.0 600.0 Receivables from Securities 2,145,943.0 - 2,145,943.0 Deferred Income Tax and Social Contribution 12.0 - 12.0 Derivative Financial Instruments 28,983.9 - 28,983.9 Other Receivables 116,794.0 116,794.0 Investment Properties 860,591.0 860,591.0 Right - of - Use Asset 16,165,803.8 2,843,140.0 13,322,663.8 INVESTMENTS 16,070,242.8 2,843,140.0 13,227,102.8 Investments in Subsidiaries and Associates 95,561.0 - 95,561.0 Other Investments 11,588,029.1 1,692,412.1 9,895,617.0 FIXED ASSETS 4,438,833.7 232,167.7 4,206,666.0 Buildings and Improvements 4,983,276.2 1,418,546.2 3,564,730.0 Machinery, Equipment, Furniture and Fixtures 1,446,326.0 - 1,446,326.0 Construction in Progress 671,893.4 79,344.4 592,549.0 Others 47,699.8 (37,646.3) 85,346.0 &Land 9,782,714.1 3,793,356.1 5,989,358.0 INTANGIBLE ASSETS - (1,404,184.0) 1,404,184.0 &Goodwill - (149,271.0) 149,271.0 &Distribution Channels 43,934.0 - 43,934.0 &Software and Licenses 3,923,825.8 2,547,117.8 1,376,708.0 &Trademarks and Patents 1,806,976.5 445,123.5 1,361,853.0 &Customer Relationships 4,007,977.8 2,354,569.8 1,653,408.0 &Supplier Relationships 70,665,119.9 8,449,867.0 62,215,252.9 TOTAL ASSETS 7

ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – PRO FORMA MARKET VALUE ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS – PRO FORMA MARFRIG BALANCE SHEET (BRL '000) AS OF DEC 2024 ADJUSTMENTS AS OF DEC 2024 22,289,358.5 - 22,289,358.5 CURRENT LIABILITIES 6,792,852.0 - 6,792,852.0 Suppliers 699,564.0 - 699,564.0 Labor liabilities 94,718.0 - 94,718.0 Tax liabilities 7,177,442.0 - 7,177,442.0 Loans, Financing and Debentures 2,547.0 - 2,547.0 Payables from Securities 189,653.0 - 189,653.0 Lease Liabilities 5,613,410.0 - 5,613,410.0 Advances from Customers 767,344.0 767,344.0 &Liabilities Related to Assets Held for Sale 91,646.0 91,646.0 Provision for Contingencies 67,969.0 67,969.0 & D e r i v a t i v e Financial Instruments 1,106.0 1,106.0 Dividends Payable 791,107.5 - 791,107.5 Other Liabilities 39,020,940.5 2,611,011.0 36,409,929.4 NON - CURRENT LIABILITIES 39,020,940.5 2,611,011.0 36,409,929.4 LONG - TERM PAYABLES 33,679,605.0 - 33,679,605.0 Loans, Financing and Debentures 180,448.0 180,448.0 Tax liabilities 1,736,517.9 1,543,247.9 193,270.0 Deferred Income Tax and Social Contribution* 1,436,336.1 1,067,763.1 368,573.0 Provision for Contingencies 713,618.0 713,618.0 Lease Liabilities 1,179,321.0 - 1,179,321.0 & D e r i v a t i v e Financial Instruments 95,094.4 - 95,094.4 Other Liabilities 9,354,818.7 5,838,856.0 3,515,962.7 SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY 10,367,391.0 - 10,367,391.0 Share Capital (3,524,168.0) - (3,524,168.0) Capital Reserve and Treasury Shares 624,664.0 - 624,664.0 Legal Reserve 964,286.0 - 964,286.0 Tax Incentive Reserve 2,637,330.0 - 2,637,330.0 Retained Earnings Reserve (9,252,605.0) (9,252,605.0) Other Comprehensive Results 1,882,345.2 183,280.4 1,699,064.7 Non - controlling Interests 5,655,575.5 5,655,575.5 Market adjustments 70,665,117.7 8,449,867.0 62,215,250.7 TOTAL LIABILITIES 7,472,473.5 5,655,575.5 1,816,898.0 SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY - CONTROLLING (BRL '000) R$ 8.79 R$ 6.66 R$ 2.14 SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY - CONTROLLING (R$ per share) QUANTITIES OF MARFRIG SHARES - EX. TREASURY SHARES 849,668,056 * BRF’s Shareholders’ Equity at Market Value is already net of deferred income tax on the fair value adjustments recognized in the balance sheet 8

▪ BRF (Balance Sheet at Market Value) The following table presents BRF's Shareholders' Equity at Market Value, based on the consolidated view according to BRF's consolidated financial statement as of December 31 st , 2024, and the effect of fair value adjustments arising from the market valuation of the accounting balances presented, explained in detail throughout this report. 9

ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS BALANCES AT DEC 2024 MARKET VALUE ADJUSTMENTS ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS BALANCES AT DEC 2024 BALANCE SHEET BRF (BRL '000) 31,568,239 738,024 30,830,215 CURRENTS ASSETS 11,165,364 - 11,165,364 Cash and cash equivalents 894,080 - 894,080 Bonds and securities 6,107,292 - 6,107,292 Accounts receivable 7,466,026 738,024 6,728,002 Inventory 2,214,189 - 2,214,189 Recoverable taxes 2,844,633 - 2,844,633 Biological assets 851 - 851 Prepaid expenses 875,804 - 875,804 Other current assets 63,499,107 31,654,240 31,844,867 NON - CURRENT ASSETS 9,974,145 - 9,974,145 LONG - TERM REALISABLE 2,331,012 - 2,331,012 Deferred taxes LT 4,545,723 - 4,545,723 Recoverable taxes LT 30,655 - 30,655 Accounts receivable LT 323,811 - 323,811 Bonds and securities LT 955,707 - 955,707 Other non current assets 1,787,237 - 1,787,237 Biological assets 129,323 - 129,323 INVESTIMENTS 129,323 - 129,323 Holdings in subsidiaries and associates 37,404,850 25,525,391 11,879,459 FIXED ASSETS 2,612,212 1,984,312 627,900 Land 15,578,119 10,134,901 5,443,218 Buildings and Facilities 18,397,962 13,403,704 4,994,258 Machinery and equipment 150,791 2,487 148,304 Furniture and Utensils 1,004 (13) 1,017 Vehicles 645,621 - 645,621 Fixed Assets in Progress 19,720 - 19,720 Advances to suppliers (579) - (579) Others 12,802,019 6,128,849 6,673,170 INTANGIBLE ASSETS - (3,771,263) 3,771,263 Goodwill 10,753,098 8,746,831 2,006,267 Trademark - (2,551) 2,551 Non - compete agreements 1,411,973 1,411,973 - Integrated Supplier Relationship 1,237 - 1,237 Patents 364,155 (256,141) 620,296 Customer relationship 233,865 - 233,865 Software 37,691 - 37,691 Other intangible assets 3,188,770 - 3,188,770 FIXED ASSETS RIGHT OF USE 3,188,770 - 3,188,770 Ridght of Use 95,067,346 32,392,264 62,675,082 TOTAL ASSETS 10

ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS MARKET VALUE ADJUSTMENTS ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS BALANCE SHEET BRF (BRL '000) BALANCES AT DEC 2024 BALANCES AT DEC 2024 20,820,572 - 20,820,572 CURRENT LIABILITIES 1,230,273 - 1,230,273 Loans and financing 14,573,097 - 14,573,097 Suppliers 1,141,944 - 1,141,944 Tax obligations 946,937 - 946,937 Wages, benefits and social charges payable 692,650 - 692,650 Provisions 2,235,671 - 2,235,671 Other payables 40,815,571 15,460,276 25,355,295 NON - CURRENT LIABILITIES 40,815,571 15,460,276 25,355,295 LONG - TERM LIABILITIES 19,510,275 - 19,510,275 Loans and financing LT 2,989,882 - 2,989,882 Suppliers LT 1,933 - 1,933 Deferred tax liabilities LT 8,277,200 6,737,736 1,539,464 Provision for contingencies LT 467,127 - 467,127 Benefits LT 846,614 846,614 Other non current liabilities 8,722,539 8,722,539 - Deferred income tax capital gains 33,431,193 16,931,988 16,499,205 SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY 13,349,156 - 13,349,156 Share capital 2,621,755 - 2,621,755 Capital reserve 2,079,253 - 2,079,253 Profit reserve (1,345,657) - (1,345,657) Treasury Shares (1,618,855) - (1,618,855) Other Comprehensive Income 1,602,941 189,388 1,413,553 Attributed to non - controlling shareholders 16,742,600 16,742,600 - Market Adjustments 95,067,336 32,392,264 62,675,072 TOTAL LIABILITIES 31,828,252 16,742,600 15,085,652 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY - CONTROLLING (BRL' 000) R$ 19.89 R$ 10.46 R$ 9.43 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY - CONTROLLING (R$ per share) QUANTITIES OF BRF SHARES - Ex Treasury Shares 1,600,310,613 11

SUMMARY OF RESULTS FOUND (SHARE EXCHANGE RATIO) ¹ ¹The share exchange ratio takes into account the Companies’ Consolidated Shareholders' Equity at Market Value, excluding the portion of equity attributable to non - controlling shareholders, thus, reconciling the Parent Companies’ Shareholders' Equity with the necessary adjustments to reflect market values. The adjustments related to non - controlling shareholders were calculated according to the proportion of the assets attributable to this class of shareholders. Note: The share exchange ratio was based on each company’s shareholding structure at the time of issuance of this report, excluding the shares held in treasury by each company. 33,431,193,151 ( A ) BRF Shareholders' Equity (R$) 1,602,941,303 (B) Shareholders' Equity to the Market - Non - Controlling Interest BRF (R$) 31,828,251,849 ( C = A - B ) BRF Shareholders' Equity - Controlling Shareholders' Equity (R$) 1,600,310,613 ( D ) Number of BRF Shares - Ex Treasury Shares 19.88879633 (E=C/D) Value per Share (R$) MARKET VALUE OF MARFRIG'S SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 9,354,818,698 (F)MARFRIG's Stockholders' Equity (R$) 1,882,345,190 ( G ) Shareholders' Equity - Non - Controlling Interest MARFRIG (R$) 7,472,473,508 (H=F - G) MARFRIG's Shareholders' Equity - Controlling Shareholders' Equity (R$) 849,668,056 ( I ) Number of Marfrig Shares - Ex Treasury Shares 8.79457978 (J = H/I) Value per Share (R$) EXCHANGE RATIO 2.26148341591578 MARFRIG Share per BRF Share EXCHANGE RATIO - BRF AND MARFRIG SHARES MARKET VALUE OF BRF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 12

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................................... ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ........................ 13 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ................. 14 2. PRINCIPLES AND CAVEATS ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. 18 3. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. .. 19 4. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE COMPANIES.................................................................................................................... ... ............................................................................................................. 20 5. DESCRIPTION OF THE OPERATION ............................................................................................................................. ... ................................................................................................................ 23 6. INDUSTRY ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ........ 24 7. VALUATION METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................. ... ........................................................................................................................... 30 8. GENERAL CRITERIA FOR ASSET VALUATION ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................... 34 9. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ..................... 45 10. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ............................................................................................................................. ... ............................................................................................................................. ... ... 46 13

1. INTRODUCTION APSIS CONSULTORIA EMPRESARIAL LTDA . , hereinafter referred to as APSIS, headquartered at Rua do Passeio, No . 62 , 6 th floor, Centro, , City and State of Rio de Janeiro, registered with the CNPJ under No . 27 . 281 . 922 / 0001 - 70 , was appointed to determine the share exchange ratio of MARFRIG and BRF shares, based on the Adjusted Net Asset Method, according to the same criteria and on the same dates, of both companies, for the purposes of complying with article 264 of Law No . 6 , 404 (Brazilian Corporation Law) . EXPERIENCE IN THE VALUATION OF PUBLICLY HELD COMPANIES APSIS’ Business Valuation segment is composed of a specialized, certified team with recent experience in valuations of publicly traded companies in various industries . The following are the most relevant valuations carried out by APSIS in the last three years . ▪ Brasil Brokers (Nexpe Participações S.A.): appraisal report for compliance with articles 226 and 227 of the Brazilian Corporation Law, issued in February 2022. ▪ Terra Santa Propriedades Agrícolas S.A.: appraisal report for determining the share exchange ratio, issued in September 2022. ▪ Locaweb S.A.: appraisal report to comply with article 256 of the Brazilian Corporation Law, issued in March 2022. ▪ Arezzo Indústria e Comércio S.A.: appraisal report to comply with articles 226 and 227 of the Brazilian Corporation Law, issued in November 2022. ▪ Paranapanema S.A.: economic and financial feasibility study of the judicial reorganization plan, in compliance with item II of article 53 of Law No. 11,101/05 (Judicial Reorganization Law), issued in February 2023. ▪ Americanas S.A.: economic and financial feasibility study of the judicial reorganization plan, in compliance with item II of article 53 of Law No. 11,101/05 (Judicial Reorganization Law), issued in March 2023. ▪ Americanas S.A.: appraisal report of assets and properties to comply with the provisions of item III of article 53 of Law No. 11,101/05 (Judicial Reorganization Law), issued in March 2023. ▪ BR Properties S.A.: appraisal report to comply with CVM Resolution No. 85/22 (Tender Offer - OPA), issued in March 2023. ▪ Alpargatas S.A.: appraisal report to comply with CVM Resolution No. 85/22 (Tender Offer - OPA), issued in May 2023. ▪ Light S.A.: economic and financial feasibility study of the judicial reorganization plan, in compliance with item II of article 53 of Law No. 11,101/05 (Judicial Reorganization Law), issued in July 2023. ▪ BR Properties S.A.: appraisal report to comply with articles 226 and 227 of the Brazilian Corporation Law, issued in September 2023. ▪ GetNinjas S.A.: appraisal report to comply with CVM Resolution No. 85/22 (Tender Offer - OPA), issued in December 2023. ▪ Alper S.A.: appraisal report for compliance with CVM Resolution No. 85/22 (Tender Offer - OPA), issued in March 2024. ▪ Atacadão S.A.: appraisal report to comply with article 264 of the Brazilian Corporation Law, issued in March 2025. ▪ Atacadão S.A.: appraisal report to comply with article 252 of the Brazilian Corporation Law, issued in March 2025. 14

In the preparation of this work, data and information provided by third parties were used, in the form of documents and verbal interviews with the client. The estimates used in this process are based on: ▪ Simplified multi - year projections of MARFRIG and BRF. ▪ Consolidated financial statements of MARFRIG and BRF on the valuation date. ▪ Consolidated financial statements of MARFRIG net of BRF effects. ▪ Historical consolidated financial statements of MARFRIG and BRF. ▪ MARFRIG's financial statement consolidation plan. ▪ BRF and MARFRIG’s contingency fair value assessment and probability analysis; ▪ Documents showing MARFRIG’s and BRF’s revenue per customer. ▪ Employee roles and corresponding salaries, benefits, and labor charges, applicable to MARFRIG and BRF. ▪ Expenses and costs related to the expansion of BRF’s supplier integration area, as well as information on the total area integrated as of the valuation date . ▪ Other managerial information necessary for complementary analyses. The professionals who participated in the preparation of this work are listed below: ▪ BRUNO GRAVINA BOTTINO - Director ▪ CAIO CESAR CAPELARI FAVERO - Director / Administrator and Accountant (CRA 141231 and CRC 1SP342654) ▪ DANIEL FELIX LAMONICA - Projects ▪ LEONARDO HENRIQUE CARDOSO BRAZ – Projects ▪ MARCELO DA LUZ NASCIMENTO - Director / Civil Engineer (CREA/SP 260559523 - 4) ▪ MIGUEL CORTÊS CARNEIRO MONTEIRO – Director / Economist and Accountant (CORECON/RJ 26898 and CRC/RJ - 118.63/P - 0) ▪ PAMELLA RUIZ GUIMARÃES – Projects/ Civil Engineer (CREA/RJ 2022094204) ▪ PEDRO PONTES GOMES LOPES MARTINS – Projects/ Mechanical Engineer (CREA/RJ 2019832330) ▪ RODRIGO MENNA BARRETO AMIL - Projects Below we present a summary of the qualifications of the technical team directly responsible for the preparation of this Report. 15

BRUNO GRAVINA BOTTINO Graduated in Production Engineering from Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), he holds an extension course in Finance from Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV), an MBA in Business Management and an LLM in Business Law, both from IBMEC . He is as Project Director at APSIS, with a career focused on Business Valuation and Strategic Consulting, having provided services to several organizations from different market segments . He has extensive experience in economic and financial valuation processes for public and private entities, with participation in the preparation of appraisal reports for purposes such as marking of investment fund quotas, compliance with the Brazilian Corporation Law, Purchase Price Allocation (PPA), Impairment Testing (CPC 01 ), Tender Offers (OPA), Shareholder Settlement, M&A, among others . In Business Consulting, he has experience in managing projects focused on organizational efficiency through mapping, reviewing, controlling, and automating processes and areas, as well as other products such as defining SLAs, goals, performance evaluation models, budget analysis, business plans, and Post Merger Integration (PMI), combining business strategy and technology with a focus on organizational efficiency . CAIO CESAR CAPELARI FAVERO Graduated in Business Administration from FAAP – SP and in Accounting Sciences from FIPECAFI . He is as a Project Director at APSIS, with over 10 years of experience in business modeling and financial and accounting valuations, working on Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) projects, corporate restructuring (such as mergers, spin - offs and capital contributions), analysis of financial and operational strategies, valuation of intangible assets, Purchase Price Allocation (PPA), Tender Offers (OPA), judicial reorganization processes, judicial technical assistance, Fairness Opinions and regulatory valuations with the involvement of the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) . He focuses on several sectors, such as retail, consumer goods, hospitals, financial, insurance, natural resources, among others . RODRIGO MENNA BARRETO AMIL Graduated in Engineering from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), with a specialization in Finance from COPPEAD - UFRJ and an MBA from COPPEAD - UFRJ . He is a Project Manager at APSIS and has over 8 years of experience in economic - financial modeling, conducting valuations for purposes such as Marking of Investment Fund Quotas, Fairness Opinions, reports for corporate purposes, Purchase Price Allocation (PPA), Tender Offers (OPA), Judicial Reorganization, and other scopes . 16

DANIEL FELIX LAMONICA Graduated in Production Engineering from Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), with an extension course in Valuation and Asset Pricing, and professional experience in corporate financial operations and valuation of tangible and intangible assets . He is a Senior Consultant at APSIS, with experience in over 100 economic - financial valuation processes for various public and private entities . He has advised leading executives in a wide range of industries, including in processes such as Judicial Reorganization, Business Valuation, Purchase Price Allocation (PPA), Due Diligence, and valuation of intangible assets . LEONARDO HENRIQUE CARDOSO BRAZ Graduated with honors in Business Administration – International Business, with a concentration in Economics, from The George Washington University, in Washington, D . C . He has an extension course in Capital Markets from Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) . He is a Consultant at APSIS, with experience in over 100 economic and financial valuation processes of public and private entities . He works on projects related to Tender Offers (OPA), Business Valuation, Purchase Price Allocation (PPA), Judicial Reorganization, Impairment Tests, Marking of Investment Fund Quotas and valuation of intangible assets, such as trademarks, contracts, patents, customer portfolios and software, among others . 17

2. PRINCIPLES AND CAVEATS The Report, the object of the work enumerated, calculated and particularized, carefully obeys the fundamental principles described below, which are important and should be carefully read. ▪ The consultants have no interest, direct or indirect, in the companies involved or in the transaction, and there is no other relevant circumstance that could characterize a conflict of interest. ▪ APSIS's professional fees are in no way subject to the findings of this Report. ▪ To the best knowledge and to the credit of the consultants, the analyses, opinions, and conclusions expressed in this Report are based on true and correct data, diligence, research and surveys. ▪ The information received from third parties is assumed to be correct, and their sources are contained and cited in the Report. ▪ For projection purposes, it is assumed that there are no encumbrances of any nature, judicial or extrajudicial, affecting the companies in question, other than those listed in this Report, if applicable. ▪ The Report presents all the limiting conditions imposed by the methodologies adopted, if any, that may affect the analyses, opinions and conclusions contained therein. ▪ The Report was prepared by APSIS, and no one, except its own consultants, prepared the analyses and corresponding conclusions. ▪ APSIS assumes full responsibility for the matter of Valuations, including implicit ones, for the exercise of its honorable functions, primarily established in its own laws, codes or regulations. ▪ This Report meets the recommendations and criteria established by the Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT), the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and the International Valuation Standards (IVS). ▪ The controlling shareholder and the managers of the companies involved have not directed, limited, hindered or performed any acts that have or may have compromised the availability, use or knowledge of information, goods, documents or work methodologies relevant to the quality of the conclusions contained in this Report. ▪ The internal process of drafting and approving this document involved the following main steps: (I) analysis of the documentation provided by management; (II) analysis of the market in which the company operates and of comparable companies; (III) discussion and preparation of the financial projection, definition of the discount rate and conclusion of the valuation; (IV) submission of the report for independent internal review; (V) implementation of any improvements and suggested changes; (VI) issuance of a final report. 18

3. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY ▪ To prepare this Report, APSIS used and assumed as true and coherent information and historical data audited by third parties or not audited, provided in writing by the company's management or obtained from the aforementioned sources, and has no responsibility for their veracity. ▪ The scope of this valuation did not include an audit of the financial statements, or a review of the work carried out by its auditors. Accordingly, APSIS is not expressing an opinion on the Applicant's financial statements and measurements. ▪ APSIS is not responsible for occasional losses to the Requester and its subsidiaries, its partners, directors and creditors or other parties as a result of the use of the data and information provided by the company and contained in this Report. ▪ This Report was developed solely for the use of the Requester and its partners, aiming at the purpose already described; therefore, it should not be published, circulated, reproduced, disseminated or used for any purpose other than the aforementioned one without the prior written approval of APSIS. ▪ The analyses and conclusions contained herein are based on several assumptions made on the present date, regarding operational projections, such as prices, volumes, market shares, revenues, taxes, investments, margins, etc. Thus, the company's future results may be different from any forecast or estimate of this work, especially if there is later knowledge of information not available at the time of the issuance of the Report. ▪ This assessment does not reflect events and impacts that occurred after the date of issuance of the Report. ▪ APSIS is not responsible for direct or indirect losses of profits that may arise from the improper use of this Report. ▪ We emphasize that understanding the conclusion of this Report will occur through the full reading of it and its attachments, and therefore no conclusions should be drawn from partial reading, which may be incorrect or mistaken. 19

4. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE COMPANIES MARFRIG Marfrig Global Foods S . A . is a Brazilian multinational company that operates in the food sector, with a presence in foodservice, retail, convenience, industrial and export channels, both in Brazil and abroad . With production units distributed throughout the Americas, the Company has a broad and diversified portfolio, being present in the largest restaurant and supermarket chains in the world, in addition to reaching consumers in about 100 countries . Marfrig's activities include the production, processing, industrialization, sale and distribution of animal protein - based products — beef, pork, sheep, poultry and fish — as well as vegetable proteins . The Company is domiciled in Brazil, with headquarters in the city of São Paulo . Marfrig's history began in 1986 , when its founder, Marcos Antônio Molina dos Santos, opened his first business at the age of 16 , quickly consolidating himself as an important distributor of beef cuts and other proteins . In 1998 , it opened its first distribution center in the city of Santo André (SP), to meet the growing demand for food products . In 2000 , the founding partners formed Marfrig Frigoríficos e Comércio de Alimentos Ltda . , which has undergone several corporate and name changes : in 2007 it became Marfrig Frigoríficos e Comércio de Alimentos S . A .; in 2009 , Marfrig Alimentos S . A .; and, in 2014 , it was renamed Marfrig Global Foods S . A . Also in 2000 , the first slaughtering and processing plant was leased in the city of Bataguassu (MS), later acquired by the company . Marfrig was incorporated on March 26 , 2007 and was registered as a publicly held company with the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Comission (CVM) on June 18 th of the same year . On June 29 , 2007 , it carried out its initial public offering (IPO), being listed on the Novo Mercado segment of B 3 . Between 2008 and 2012 , the Company made important investments and acquisitions, becoming one of the most internationalized and diversified companies in the Brazilian protein sector . Of note are the acquisitions of Moy Park ( 2008 ), Seara ( 2009 ) and Keystone ( 2010 ) . Moy Park was later sold as part of the company's strategy to focus on its core business, beef protein . In 2018 , Marfrig acquired control of the U . S . - based National Beef, the fourth largest beef company in the United States, consolidating itself as one of the largest global companies in the sector in terms of capacity . Also, during this period, it sold the subsidiary Keystone Foods, specialized in chicken meat . In January 2019 , the Company acquired 91 . 89 % of QuickFood, the Argentine leader in the production of beef - derived foods and owner of the Paty brand, the country's leading hamburger market . In the same year, it acquired a BRF processed plant in Várzea Grande (MT), specializing in the production of hamburgers, meatballs and kibbehs, in addition to entering a strategic partnership with BRF to supply hamburgers, among other products . Also in 2019 , together with other members of National Beef, Marfrig participated in the acquisition of all the stakes in Iowa Premium, LLC, for an aggregate value of US $ 150 million . BRF Investment 20

According to MARFRIG's 2024 Reference Form, the Company, following a strategy of commercial complementarity, invested approximately R $ 6 . 9 billion throughout 2021 in the acquisition of shares of BRF S . A . , which granted it a 33 . 20 % equity interest in the company, making it BRF's largest individual shareholder . In January 2022 , MARFRIG obtained the approval of its Board of Directors to subscribe shares within the limit of its equity interest, equivalent to 33 . 20 % of BRF's new share offering . BRF issued 270 , 000 , 000 new shares, with a total value of R $ 5 . 4 billion, at a unit price of R $ 20 . 00 . MARFRIG invested R $ 1 . 8 billion, acquiring 90 , 198 , 777 new shares . After this operation and new acquisitions, MARFRIG's stake in BRF's capital stock increased to 33 . 27 % . In February 2022 , after investing around R $ 9 billion in BRF, MARFRIG appointed a slate of candidates to compose the company's new Board of Directors, which was elected by majority vote in March of that year . Following the approval of the new Board of Directors on April 1 , 2022 , MAFRIG assumed control of BRF S . A . In August 2022, Miguel Gularte was appointed to and assumed the position of CEO of BRF. In 2023, BRF informed the market of the conclusion of a follow - on public offering, through which 600,000,000 new common shares were subscribed and paid up, at a price of R$ 9.00 per share, totaling R$ 5.4 billion. Within the scope of this offering, MARFRIG invested approximately R$ 1.8 billion, aiming to maintain its shareholding. During this process of capital increase and revision of BRF's bylaws, most shareholders voted and approved the suppression of the "poison pill" clause, which previously limited MARFRIG from increasing its stake in the company. As a result, MARFRIG made a new investment of around R$3 billion, increasing its stake from 33.27% to 50.06%, as announced on December 28, 2023. Furthermore, according to the 2024 Reference Form, as of December 31, 2024, MARFRIG held 50.49% of BRF's share capital, consolidating its position as the company's controlling shareholder. On the same date, MARFRIG had 126 thousand employees, in addition to 3 industrial complexes, 1 processing unit, 3 distribution centers and 1 commercial office in Brazil. 21

BRF BRF is one of the world's largest producers of fresh and frozen animal protein, standing out for its extensive production capacity and a portfolio of more than 7 , 300 SKUs . Its products include marinated and frozen chicken, Chester® chicken, turkey meats, specialty meats, frozen processed meats, ready meals, fractionated items, as well as plant - based products . The company also sells margarine, butter, cottage cheese, special sweets, sandwiches, plant - based foods and animal feed . Owner of leading brands widely recognized by the public, such as Sadia, Perdigão and Qualy, BRF consolidated its position in the market from the merger between two traditional family businesses : Perdigão and Sadia . The union was announced in 2009 and completed in 2012 , marking the creation of one of the largest conglomerates in the food sector . Both companies already occupied prominent positions in the national and international market, with products exported to more than 120 countries . In the pet food segment, BRF has four manufacturing units, located in the states of São Paulo, Rio Grande do Sul, Paraná and also in Paraguay . Its portfolio includes brands such as Biofresh, Guabi Natural, Gran Plus, Balance, Three Dogs, Three Cats, PrimoCão, PrimoGato, Faro, Bônos, Apolo and Átila, serving different consumer profiles and their pets . BRF Operations With a 40.8% share of the Brazilian processed food market as of December 31, 2024, BRF maintains a solid structure consisting of 44 industrial units and 103 distribution centers. The company has a highly developed logistics system in the domestic market, supported by a vast distribution network that includes distribution centers and transit points. In 2024, this structure made it possible to serve approximately 415 thousand customers globally, with more than 500 thousand deliveries per month, according to MARFRIG's 2024 Reference Form. Complementing its operational efficiency, BRF invests in technology through a digital sales platform that suggests orders in a personalized way, based on the characteristics of each point of sale. Also, according to MAFRIG's Reference Form, the company demonstrated strong capillarity, with more than 300 thousand active customers in Brazil in June 2024. 22

5. DESCRIPTION OF THE OPERATION According to information provided by MARFRIG's management, the companies are evaluating a corporate reorganization involving the merger of BRF’s shares. The present study was prepared with the objective of providing legal and corporate support for the operation. To this end, the assets of both companies were appraised at market prices, in compliance with Article 264 of Law No. 6,404/76. The organizational chart below presents the organizational structure of MARFRIG and BRF before and after the corporate restructuring to be carried out. PRE - MERGER STRUCTURE POST - MERGER STRUCTURE * 50.49% 49.51% 100% * BRF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS Receive MARFRIG (MFRG3) shares through the proposed share exchange ratio BRF MARFRIG BRF MARFRIG BRF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS BRF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS 23

6. INDUSTRY ANALYSIS THE BRAZILIAN FOOD INDUSTRY Brazil is globally recognized for its leading role in agribusiness, standing out as a food producing power, both grains and animal products . The Brazilian food industry is the largest in the country, accounting for 10 . 8 % of the national GDP and generating 2 . 075 million formal and direct jobs . The revenue of the Brazilian food industry reached R $ 1 . 277 trillion in 2024 , an increase of 9 . 98 % compared to the previous year, according to data released by the Brazilian Association of the Food Industry (ABIA) . Of this total, 72 % (approximately R $ 918 billion) came from the domestic market, while 28 % (approximately US $ 66 . 3 billion) came from foreign trade . Since 2022 , Brazil has been the world leader in the export of industrialized foods in volume . In 2024 , the country exported 80 . 3 million tons, an increase of 10 . 4 % compared to 2023 , with total revenues reaching US $ 66 . 3 billion, 6 . 6 % higher than that recorded in the previous year (US $ 62 . 2 billion) . Brazilian food products reach more than 190 countries and territories, with the main markets being Asia ( 38 . 7 % of exports, with emphasis on China, which represents 14 . 9 % ), followed by the Arab League ( 18 . 9 % ) and the European Union ( 12 . 6 % ) . Brazil stands out as the world's largest exporter and 2 nd largest producer of beef, the world's largest exporter and 2 nd largest producer of poultry meat, in addition to being the 4 th largest producer and 3 rd largest exporter of pork . The items that lead the list of Brazilian exports are : ▪ Animal proteins (meat): US$ 26.2 billion; ▪ Sugar products: US$ 18.9 billion; ▪ Soybean products: US$ 10.7 billion; ▪ Oils and oils: US$ 2.3 billion; ▪ Juices and vegetable preparations: US$ 3.7 billion. MEAT INDUSTRY - WORLDWIDE PRODUCTION According to the “ Meat Market Review : Overview of Global Market Developments in 2024 ” report, published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), world meat production grew by 1 . 7 % in 2024 , reaching 379 million tons (carcass equivalent) . Reduction in input costs, including lower feed and energy prices compared to previous years, has played a crucial role in sustaining this growth . The increase in production was mainly driven by poultry meat, followed by gains in beef production, while sheep meat production saw marginal growth and pork production remained stable . 24

1961 2010 2023 Regionally, there was an expansion in meat production in all the main producing areas, especially in Europe, Asia and South America . In Europe, the increases were mainly in pork and poultry, with smaller increases in beef . In Asia, the main growth factor was the expansion of poultry meat production . In South America, meat production increased, with emphasis on the growth of beef and poultry production in Brazil . Among the major producing regions, Asia leads the world meat production, followed by North America, Europe, and South America . Regarding countries, China leads the ranking with 97 . 5 million tons, followed by the United States, with 47 . 46 million tons, and Brazil, with 31 . 6 million tons in 2023 , according to the latest FAO survey . GLOBAL MEAT PRODUCTION (1961 - 2023) 400Million Tonnes 350Million Tonnes 300Million Tonnes 250Million Tonnes 200Million Tonnes 150Million Tonnes 100Million Tonnes 50Million Tonnes Million Tonnes 1970 1980 1990 2000 Asia Europe North America South America Africa Oceania Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) – 2025, with primary processing by Our World in Data 100Million Tonnes 80Million Tonnes 60Million Tonnes 40Million Tonnes 20Million Tonnes Million Tonnes 120Million Tonnes 1961 1990 India 1992 Russia 2000 United States 2010 2023 MEAT PRODUCTION (1961 - 2023) 1970 Brazil 1980 China Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) – 2025, with primary processing by Our World in Data 25

1961 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2022 MEAT INDUSTRY - WORLD TRADE According to the FAO report, global trade in meat and meat products increased by 4 . 7 % in 2024 , reaching 42 . 5 million tons (carcass equivalent), after two consecutive years of contraction . This recovery was underpinned by significant growth in meat production and improving global economic conditions, including reducing inflationary pressures and strengthening consumer purchasing power . These factors have contributed to the increase in meat imports, especially in developed economies facing constraints on domestic supply . The expansion was observed in all meat categories, with the trade of red meat, especially beef, registering the most significant increase . Strong import demand, especially from the United States, driven by limited growth in domestic production, and to a lesser extent from China, has contributed to the increase in world beef trade . In addition, pork and poultry trade also expanded, driven by reduced tariffs aimed at stabilizing domestic prices, as well as regional trade agreements that facilitated the elimination of trade restrictions related to animal diseases . These measures have expanded access to markets, stimulating cross - border trade in meat . The following graph shows the world per capita consumption of meat by type . PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION BY TYPE (1961 - 2022) 60 Kg 50 Kg 40 Kg 30 Kg 20 Kg 10 Kg Kg Poultry Pork Cattle and Buffalo Sheep and Goats Other Meats Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) – 2025, with primary processing by Our World in Data 26

YoY 25/24 2025* 2024* 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 Discrimination - 1,8% 214,690.0 217,836.3 224,602.1 234,352.6 233,390.8 229,957.6 225,903.4 Herd (1,000 head) - 4,3% 9,783.6 10,220.9 9,516.7 8,673.7 8,328.5 8,492.7 8,866.1 Beef production (1,000 t carcass equivalent) - 0,5% 61.1 62.5 61.5 80.6 70.7 62.7 49.7 Imports (1,000 t carcass equivalent) 2,5% 3,659.3 3,571.5 3,029.8 3,018.0 2,478.2 2,690.9 2,482.8 Exports (1,000 t carcass equivalent) - 7,8% 6,186.4 6,711.9 6,548.4 5,736.3 5,921.0 5,856.4 6,433.0 Domestic availability (1,000 t carcass equivalent) 0,5% 206.2 205.2 204.1 203.1 202.0 200.9 199.9 Population (millions of inhabitants) - 8,3% 30.0 32.7 32.1 28.2 29.3 29.2 32.2 Per capita availability (kg/inhabitant/year) Source: Conab/IBGE/Secex Note: *For 2024 and 2025 - Conab Estimates 27 BRAZIL BEEF Brazil plays a very important role in the international livestock sector, being the largest exporter, the third largest consumer and the second largest producer of beef in the world, with exports to more than 150 countries . According to the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (Mapa), beef sales reached USD 1 . 25 billion in September 2024 , representing an increase of 29 . 2 % compared to the same period in 2023 . According to the Secretariat of Trade and International Relations (SCRI/Mapa), this revenue was the third highest recorded in exports in the sector . In addition, exports of fresh beef generated a record volume shipped, with sales totaling US $ 1 . 14 billion, a growth of 28 . 5 % . According to data from the Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (National Supply Company, Conab), released in the report " Perspectivas para a Agropecuária – Safra 2024 / 25 , volume 12 ", beef production was 9 . 5 million tons in 2023 , an increase of 9 . 7 % compared to 2022 . For 2024 , expectations point to a record production of 10 . 2 million tons, a growth of 7 . 4 % compared to 2023 , reflecting the high moment of the livestock cycle at the end of 2024 . For 2025 , Conab estimates predict a production of 9 . 8 million tons, a reduction of 4 . 3 % compared to 2024 . This reversal in the livestock cycle occurs after intense culling of females . According to Conab, it is expected that, in 2025 , there will be a gradual increase in the retention of females, resulting in less availability of animals for slaughter in the medium and long term . This should generate stability or a moderate drop in slaughters and, consequently, in meat production . Beef Supply in Brazil (2019 – 2025)

YoY 25/24 2025* 2024* 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 Discrimination 3,1% 7,169.1 6,952.0 6,876.0 6,856.8 6,912.2 6,810.1 6,459.1 Placement of broiler chicks (million head) 2,1% 15,513.5 15,189.3 14,935.2 14,782.8 15,322.8 14,683.2 13,936.0 Chicken meat production (1,000 t) 5,5% 3.2 3.0 1.9 4.8 5.3 5.2 5.0 Imports (1,000 t) 1,9% 5,199.4 5,102.1 5,009.3 4,652.8 4,467.6 4,124.7 4,174.8 Exports (1,000 t) 2,3% 10,317.2 10,090.2 9,927.8 10,134.9 10,770.5 10,563.7 9,766.2 Domestic availability (1,000 t) 0,5% 206.2 205.2 204.1 203.1 202.0 200.9 199.9 Population (millions of inhabitants) 1,7% 50.0 49.2 48.6 49.9 53.3 52.6 48.9 Per capita availability (kg/inhabitant/year) Source: Conab Note: (*) projections 28 POULTRY MEAT (CHICKEN) In the poultry sector, the United States leads world production with 21 . 2 million tons . Brazil ranks as the second largest producer, with 15 . 2 million tons produced in 2024 , representing a growth of 1 . 7 % compared to 2023 . Brazilian production is expected to reach 15 . 5 million tons in 2025 , an increase of 2 . 1 % compared to 2024 , according to data from Conab . Regarding exports, Brazil remains the world’s largest exporter, with 36 % of global chicken meat exports, totaling 5 . 1 million tons in 2024 , a growth of 1 . 9 % compared to 2023 . For 2025 , expectations are that Brazil will repeat this growth, reaching 5 . 2 million tons, an increase of 1 . 9 % compared to the previous year . According to Conab, national economic indicators, such as GDP growth and reduced unemployment, contributed to a more heated domestic demand, allowing advances in live chicken prices . This scenario, combined with the good pace of exports and the conjuncture of controlled costs — due to the drop in grain prices — generated an optimistic outlook for the chicken meat market in 2025 . Overall, the chicken market remains robust, with prospects for continued growth in both production and global consumption . The trade dynamics reflect Brazil's importance as a key supplier, while China remains a major global consumer and importer . An isolated episode of Newcastle disease in Rio Grande do Sul, in July 2024 , demonstrated the effectiveness of biosafety in Brazilian production . Brazil adopted an automatic self - embargo and, in less than a week, the end of the outbreak of the disease was announced . According to FAO, most Brazilian chicken meat importers, including China, have resumed imports, adopting a regionalization approach, that is, restricting trade only to the affected region . Despite lower demand from China, Brazil's exports were boosted by increased purchases from the United Arab Emirates, Japan, the Philippines, Mexico and Iraq . Poultry Meat Supply in Brazil (2019 – 2025

YoY 25/24 2025* 2024* 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 Discrimination 1,2% 46,122.7 45,556.1 44,973.6 44,393.9 42,550.9 41,211.2 40,556.1 Herd (1,000 head) 1,6% 5,449.2 5,365.6 5,298.6 5,186.3 4,899.0 4,482.0 4,125.7 Pork meat production (1,000 t carcass equivalen 2,8% 20.1 19.6 17.1 22.6 29.5 15.9 19.2 Imports (1,000 t carcass equivalent) 3,0% 1,270.2 1,233.3 1,211.7 1,109.1 1,131.0 1,027.8 763.0 Exports (1,000 t carcass equivalent) 1,1% 4,199.1 4,151.9 4,104.0 4,099.9 3,797.5 3,470.1 3,381.9 Domestic availability (1,000 t) 0,5% 206.2 205.2 204.1 203.1 202.0 200.9 199.9 Population (millions of inhabitants) 0,6% 20.4 20.2 20.1 20.2 18.8 17.3 16.9 Per capita availability (kg/inhabitant/year) Source: Conab Note: *For 2024 and 2025 - Conab Estimates 29 PORK In the pork sector, Brazil is the 4 th largest producer in the world, with 5 . 37 million tons in 2024 , representing an increase of 1 . 3 % compared to 2023 . Brazilian production is expected to reach 5 . 4 million tons in 2025 , a growth of 1 . 6 % compared to 2024 , according to data from Conab . China leads global pork production, accounting for 49 % of world production and half of global consumption, according to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) . In the export segment, the United States leads, with 32 % of world exports, followed by the European Union and Brazil, which occupies the 3 rd position, with 14 % of global exports, totaling 1 . 23 million tons in 2024 , an increase of 1 . 8 % compared to 2023 . For 2025 , Brazilian exports are expected to reach 1 . 27 million tons, a growth of 3 . 0 % compared to 2024 , according to Conab . The Conab report indicates that, in 2024 , the global pork market was impacted by adjustments in production and marketing, with China reducing its imports . Other markets, such as Mexico, absorbed part of the volume previously destined for China . In 2023 , China accounted for 32 % of all Brazilian pork exports, but by 2024 , that percentage had dropped to less than 20 % . Although exports to China decreased significantly in 2024 , this drop was more than offset by increases in exports to the Philippines, which became the second largest destination for Brazilian pork, according to FAO data . In addition, exports to markets such as Japan, Chile, and Singapore also registered significant increases, reducing Brazil's dependence on the Chinese market and highlighting Brazil’s market diversification strategy . Pork Meat Supply in Brazil (2019 – 2025)

7. VALUATION METHODOLOGY 1. ASSET APPROACH: ADJUSTED NET ASSET METHOD This methodology is derived from the accounting practices adopted in Brazil, in which the financial statements are prepared based on the principle of historical cost or acquisition cost or adjusted to fair value when so required . Under these accounting practices, the carrying amount of a company's equity is equal to the carrying amount of assets minus the carrying amount of liabilities . The application of this methodology, which takes book values as a starting point, requires adjustments to the company's assets and liabilities to reflect their realizable values, that is, the values that could be obtained in a sale or liquidation of assets and obligations . The result of this application provides an initial basis for estimating the value of the company, as well as providing a useful reference for comparisons with other valuation methodologies . According to economic principles, the value of assets minus the value of liabilities should be equal to the value of the company's shareholders' equity . From the perspective of valuation, value definitions are determined by the purpose of the valuation in question . Thus, the asset approach focuses on valuing the company by adjusting the book values of its assets and liabilities to their fair market values . Relevant assets and liabilities are valued based on fair market value, and this valuation is compared to the book value (or net amount) of the company's assets . The adjustments made are added to the book equity, thus generating the company's market value through the asset approach . It is important to note that, under this method, no type of future profitability (such as goodwill) should be incorporated into the calculation of the shareholders’ equity at market value . In addition, the methodology used in this assessment assumes that the company is in continuous activity (going concern), which means that the company will continue its operations for the foreseeable future . Thus, expenses related to the liquidation of assets or liabilities, as well as costs related to bankruptcy or liquidation proceedings of the company, were not considered in the calculations of this valuation . 2. VALUATION APPROACHES Three types of approaches can be used to determine the value of an asset, whether tangible or intangible . They are : ▪ Market approach; ▪ Approach to income; and ▪ Cost approach. 30

MARKET APPROACH The fair value of the asset is estimated by comparing it to similar or comparable assets that have been sold or listed for sale in the primary or secondary market . In the case of intangible assets, sale or market prices are rarely available, as they are usually transferred only as part of a business, and not in a one - off transaction, which means that this approach is rarely used in the valuation of intangible assets . INCOME APPROACH It defines the value of the asset as the current value of the future benefits that result from its right of ownership . The fair value of the future cash flows that the asset will generate during its useful life is projected based on current expectations and assumptions about future conditions . It is worth noting, however, that synergistic or strategic effects other than those realized by market participants should not be included in the projected cash flows . ▪ MULTI - PERIOD EXCESS EARNINGS METHOD (MPEEM) The MPEEM measures the present value of future income to be generated during the remaining useful life of a given asset . Using the analysis of the company's projected results as a reference, the cash flows directly attributable to the asset, on a pre - tax basis, are calculated, starting from the base date stipulated in the valuation . As in the company's analysis, the cost of goods sold and other operating expenses are deducted from the projected revenue attributed to the asset, resulting at the operating net income . From there, the charges on the identified contributory assets, directly related to the asset in question (contributory asset charges), are removed . A detailed description of the MPEEM methodology can be found in the book Valuation For Financial Reporting : Fair Value Measurements and Reporting, Intangible Assets, Goodwill, and Impairment (MARD et al . , 2007 ) and also in the guidelines issued by The Appraisal Foundation in Best Practices For Valuations In Financial Reporting : Intangible Asset Working Group – Contributory Assets (AARON et al . , 2010 ) . The assumed fair value of a contributory asset is not necessarily static over time . Working capital and fixed assets can fluctuate over the forecast period, and returns are typically based on the estimated average balances of each year . While the book value of amortizable intangible assets declines over time, it is assumed that such assets are replenished annually . Therefore, the contributory charge typically takes the form of a fixed annual rate . An exception to this rule is a non - compete agreement . 31

BASES FOR CALCULATING THE REQUIRED RETURN ON CONTRIBUTORY ASSETS The following table presents the suggested bases for each group of contributory assets. 32 CHARGING BASIS ACTIVE Average post - tax funding rate applied to the company’s working capital financing. Working Capital Financing rates for similar assets applicable to market participants (e . g . , general financing terms offered by suppliers), or rates implied by operating leases, finance leases, or both, typically separated into a return on (investment return) and a return of (capital recovery) the asset . Fixed assets (e.g., real estate, plant, and equipment) Rates appropriate to the risk profile of the intangible asset being analyzed . When market evidence is available, it should be used . In other cases, the rates should be consistent with the relative risk of other assets included in the analysis, and higher for riskier assets . Other intangible assets, including basic technology ▪ ROYALTY RELIEF This methodology is considered the standard and preferred technique for the valuation of assets such as trademarks, core technology and patents . In the Relief from Royalty Method, we estimate the value of these types of intangible assets, by capitalizing on the royalties that are saved because the company owns the intangible asset . In other words, the owner of the brand, core technology, and patents realizes a benefit from owning the intangible asset, rather than paying rent or royalties for the use of the asset . ▪ COST APPROACH It measures the investment required to reproduce a similar asset, which has an identical capacity to generate benefits . And this approach is based on the principle of substitution, in which a prudent investor would not pay more for an asset than the cost to replace it with a comparable ready - made .

▪ REPRODUCTION COST NEW (RPCN) It is "the current cost of an identical new good" . In other words, it is the estimated cost to build, at current prices as of the valuation date, an exact copy, or replica of the asset under valuation, using the same materials, building standards, design, layout, and quality of workmanship, and incorporating all the asset - subject deficiencies, overcapacity, and obsolescence . ▪ REPLACEMENT COST NEW (RPLCN) It is "the current cost of a similar new asset having the nearest equivalent utility to the asset being valued" . There are two alternative methods for calculating the DRCN . The first method (Reproduction Method) begins with the RPDCN, with adjustments made for physical depreciation and functional and technological obsolescence . The second method (Replacement Method) starts with the RPLCN, with adjustments made for physical depreciation and for additional functional and technological obsolescence . Certain elements of functional and technological obsolescence are already addressed in the calculation of the RPLCN . However, the quantification of overcapacity and the additional functionalities of the replacement asset in contrast to the asset to be assessed should be addressed . If economic obsolescence is indicated, it must be quantified, and the appropriate adjustment must be made, so that the DRCN is equivalent to fair value . 33

8. GENERAL CRITERIA FOR ASSET VALUATION This Report was prepared with the purpose of complying with the legislation in force in the context of the corporate reorganization involving BRF and MARFRIG . The audited financial statements taken as a basis were prepared by the companies, and the following pages present the general criteria defined for the market valuation of each account and/or group of accounts of the two companies involved in the operation . Thus, considerations about the valuations carried out follow . BRF BRF's appraised assets with fair value adjustments to be identified at market value refer to its customer portfolio of one of the company's business lines, its Brands held, its portfolio of integrated suppliers and the fixed assets in general held by the company on the valuation date . In addition, fair value adjustments related to contingent liabilities held by BRF were recognized, referring to contingencies classified as possible and remote . In addition, the goodwill and non - compete agreement recorded in BRF's Balance Sheet, referring to past acquisitions, were written off due to the orderly settlement of the Adjusted Net Asset methodology . The BRF assets with identified fair value adjustments are the following, with their respective valuation approaches : MARFRIG The assets appraised for MARFRIG with fair value adjustments to be identified at market value refer to its customer portfolio from the South America (LATAM) operations, its proprietary brands, relationships with suppliers, assets held for sale, and fixed assets in general held by the company as of the valuation date . Additionally, fair value adjustments related to contingent liabilities held by MARFRIG and not previously recognized, classified as possible and remote contingencies, were accounted for . Furthermore, goodwill and sales channels recorded in MARFRIG’s balance sheet, stemming from past acquisitions, were written off in light of the orderly liquidation approach adopted under the Adjusted Net Asset methodology . ASSETS/ LIABILITIES BRF METHODOLOGY Customer Relatioship - Business Unit Tradename Integrated Supplier Relationship Inventory - Finished Products Contingencies - Possible and Remote Fixed Assets MPEEM (Excess Earnings) Relief from Royalties Replacement Cost Approach Market Approach According to the risk assessment of BRF's legal advisors Market Approach 34

BRF INTANGIBLE ASSETS ▪ CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP The customer portfolio intangible asset derives from the company's relationship with its clientele. This relationship has value for a business, as it represents a stable and recurring source of income. BRF has its sales highly diluted among a high number of customers. BRF's main customers are large retail chains in Brazil, especially the main supermarket chains. In management analyses of MARFRIG's customers and revenues, loyalty can be perceived, which translates into constant revenues from the products sold. To calculate the value of this intangible asset, the Multi - Period Excess Earnings Method (MPEEM) was used, with the identification of the contributory assets and the appropriate rates of economic remuneration of these assets. The MPEEM aims to isolate the cash flow attributable to a specific asset from the total cash flow. In this method, debits are made against the total net income, by the use of contributing assets, and the excess profit is allocated to the intangible under valuation. To calculate the customer portfolio, the company's cash flow projection estimated by management was used as a basis. The churn rate of BRF's total portfolio was estimated according to calculations based on the company's total revenue history . However, after the economic and financial modeling of the total customer portfolio, it was observed that the company's contributory assets have a contribution margin higher than the company's own total (consolidated) margin, with the main contributory assets being fixed assets and brands . Based on this, it was observed that BRF's total customer portfolio does not have a market value to be identified in the context of this report . MARFRIG’s appraised assets are as follows, with their respective valuation approaches: ASSETS / LIABILITIES MARFRIG METODOLOGIA Fixed Assets Inventory Tradenames Customer Relationship/Contract Asset Held For Sale Contingencies BRF Supplier Relationship - National Beef Market Approach Market Approach Relief from Royalty MPEEM (Excess Earnings) Financial Statements Accordin to the risk as assessment of BRF's legal advisors Shareholders’ Equity at Market Value With or Without model 35

o CLIENT PORTFOLIO – BUSINESS VERTICAL Under the same methodology and intangible rationale described above, the customer portfolio of one of BRF’s business lines was separately evaluated, and its fair value was identified in the context of this report . Therefore,the MPEEM methodology was applied considering revenues and operating margins only from this operation, with the identification of the contributory assets and the appropriate rates of return of these assets . Further details of the valuation are presented in Attachment 1 . ▪ BRANDS Trademarks, logos, and the like have value to a business, in part because they allow consumers to easily identify a business with its products and services . The characteristics of the brand, as perceived by the consumer, can generate a consistent demand for the company's products or services . Branding can therefore enable revenue growth through increased units sold or charging higher prices than those charged by similar companies that do not have the benefit of that particular brand . BRF has, on the valuation date extremely relevant product brands, which are "top of mind" brand references in the food sector as a whole . The brands were appraised in a segregated manner in this report for demonstration purposes only, considering the main brands held by the company . To this end, a proportion of the company's net revenue per brand was used, observing the historical proportion performed by each brand . The brands appraised were the following : Sadia and Miss Daisy ; Perdigão, Na Brasa e Ouro ; margarine brands : Qualy, Claybom and Deline ; Banvit (BRF brand present in Turkey) ; and other less relevant brands (not " top of mind ") . Attachment 1 of this report details the main brands evaluated, the methodology used, and values found . The recognition of the fair value of the brands in the balance sheet to market was done in a consolidated manner, adding to the value of the brands . ▪ INTEGRATED SUPPLIER PORTFOLIO BRF has a network of more than 10 thousand suppliers integrated into the company's operating plants . The main function of these partners is the breeding and handling of the animal, where the integrated partner cedes the property and is remunerated for the service and investment applied . Regarding the supplies of animals for breeding, feed, medicines, transportation and veterinary monitoring are all the responsibility of BRF . The relationship between the parties takes place through a contract for the provision of services and remuneration for the use of the land, which is held by the integrated supplier (lease) . The entire production process in the integrated supply chain is monitored to ensure quality standards, food safety and compliance with current legislation . Traceability is a key point : BRF is able to follow the entire cycle, from the producer to the final product, facilitating quality control . Integrated producers, in turn, have access to financed inputs, technical support and purchase guarantees, which brings greater economic security and stimulus for the professionalization of rural properties . 36

According to the information provided by the company’s management regarding the sector, this type of relationship is vital in the chicken and pork chain for any player operating in the market . Thus, the intangible asset was appraised through the replacement cost/reconstruction methodology, regarding the total integrated area, considering all expenses and investments necessary for reconstruction from the valuation date of this relationship . To this end, BRF has provided updated management information regarding the necessary expenses foreseen for the expansion of the supplier area . The main expenses for the expansion of the integrated area were estimated, such as expenses with direct and indirect personnel, third - party services to be contracted, materials and utilities . Taking into account the total expenses specifically allocated to the expansion of the relationship area with the integrated partner (disregarding expenses for the maintenance of the area already owned) and the expanded area that generated such capex, the total area on the valuation date was estimated, in square meters, of suppliers integrated into BRF's plants . The following table summarizes the assumptions adopted and the fair value of the portfolio of suppliers held by BRF : ▪ GOODWILL AND NON - COMPETE AGREEMENT - PREVIOUS ACQUISITIONS The goodwill and non - compete agreement arising from previous acquisitions made by BRF, which, according to the company, do not have, or are not subject to, tax deductibility as of the valuation date, were written off from the market - value balance sheet under the orderly liquidation approach of the Adjusted Net Asset Value methodology. Total Cost Average Reconstruction Cost Total Integration Area Integrated Supplier Relationship BRL ' 000 R$/m² m² 1,411,973 48.6 29,024,398 Integrated Development 48.6 1,411,973 TOTAL 29,024,398 Intangible Fair Value (BRL ‘000) 1,411,973 37

BRF TANGIBLE ASSETS ▪ ASSET The company's main physical assets consist of machinery and equipment, buildings and facilities, as well as owned land owned by BRF. The valuation criteria adopted to determine the market value of this group of BRF's assets, and the results obtained can be viewed in Attachment 2. ▪ STOCK According to the company's Financial Statement as of December 31, 2024, BRF has a relevant finished product inventory balance (ready for sale/distribution). In this sense, from the perspective of an orderly liquidation of assets, it is necessary to determine the fair value of this inventory considering the sale flow. The first step in valuing inventory is the application of the gross sales margin on the value of finished products on the base date. Next, the cost of disposing of the product and a theoretical profit that would be charged for the disposing service provided by third parties are considered. Finally, the cost of storage is reduced to reach the market value of the inventory. According to the financial statement received, there was an inventory of finished products in the amount of R$ 3,524,872 thousand. The cost of disposal, the profit over disposal effort and the cost of storage were estimated based on the company's historical results. For the other components of the company's inventory on the base date, no additional adjustments were considered, given that they are stocks of raw materials intended for use in the production/handling of animals and other warehouse/spare materials. The premises and details of the evaluation can be found in Attachment 1 of this report. BRF LIABILITIES ▪ CONTINGENCIES BRF reports liabilities related to provisions for risks arising from legal proceedings classified as having a probable likelihood of loss, supported by legal opinions, in accordance with Technical Pronouncement CPC 25 – Provisions, Contingent Liabilities, and Contingent Assets (CPC 25 ) . As of the valuation date, the probable contingencies, mostly of a tax nature, in addition to civil and labor - related matters, can be reviewed in greater detail in the company’s public disclosures . Based on CPC 25 , present obligations, resulting from past events, in which the outflow of funds are not likely to settle the obligations constitute contingent liabilities . Although they are not recognized in accounting, the fair values of contingent liabilities, referring to materialized contingencies with possible and remote probability of loss, should negatively impact the fair value measurement of shareholders' equity to market, considering that another company, with the same characteristics, but which does not appear as a defendant in lawsuits, tends to have a higher net worth in the market . 38

Additionally, from the perspective of M&A transactions, it is common for the buyer of a business to insert protective clauses in a Share Purchase Agreement in order to shield the buyer from any liabilities not accounted for in the acquired company's balance sheet . This is due to the fact that these liabilities, even if they are possible or remote from loss and that are not included in the balance sheet, affect the value of a business . The measurement of the fair values of contingent liabilities, both possible and remote, of loss was based on opinions of the company's legal advisors of the materialized causes, which considered the current status of the ongoing lawsuits and the percentages of probability of loss of each of the relevant causes, being lower than the face values of the causes . These amounts, although they are not part of BRF's accounting liabilities because they do not comply with the provisions of CPC 25 with regard to accounting recognition, should, in the appraiser's understanding, compose a market adjustment that impacts the fair price per share of the Company, through the Adjusted Net Asset methodology . That said, the fair values of the lawsuits related to BRF, not only in cases with probability of probable loss (already accounted for on December 31 , 2024 ), but also in cases with possible and remote probability, as well as the probabilities of execution of these contingencies, were sent by BRF's management and incorporated in this report . For the purposes of this evaluation, we consider an increase in the contingencies considered relevant by BRF, classified by BRF's management as likely to be a possible or remote loss, which the company may assume, and the consolidated result of this evaluation made by the company is observed in the following table . CONTINGENCIES BRF (BRL '000) EVALUATED Capital gain from total contingencies Face value Equivalent probability Capital Gain 28,189,789 23.9% 6,737,736 Total Capital Gain (BRL '000) 6,737,736 39

▪ DEFERRED TAXES As for the fair value adjustments of the total assets net of the fair value adjustments of the total liabilities, it is necessary to constitute a liability related to the Income Tax and the Social Contribution on the capital gain, according to the Lucro Real tax regime, established by Law No . 9 , 249 / 95 (art . 15 , † 4 , and art . 20 ), since the BRF corporation is headquartered in Brazil . Thus, a rate of 34 % was applied to the net fair value adjustments, resulting from the market adjustment between assets and liabilities . ASSETS AND LIABILITIES ANALYZED WITHOUT ADJUSTMENT TO ASSIGNED MARKET – BRF ▪ BIOLOGICAL ASSETS BRF has an estimated stock at the base date of approximately 177 . 9 million birds and 4 . 9 million pigs in the control, and 201 . 2 million birds and 4 . 9 million pigs . In addition, the company maintains forests as collateral for financing and tax and civil contingencies, valued at R $ 70 million . Regarding such biological assets, chapter 8 . 1 of the company's Financial Statement as of December 31 , 2024 , provides the main information and assumptions considered for accounting recognition at fair value of these assets on the base date, according to accounting policy . The following is a translated excerpt from the aforementioned document : "The Company classifies live animals and forests as biological assets. These assets are valued at their fair value, and the technique of cost approach to live animals and revenue approach to forests is applied. The Company annually conducts the fair value assessment study, using the discounted cash flow method, and the gain or loss arising from the change in the fair value of the biological asset is recognized in the income statement of the year in which it originates. In the calculation of the fair value of live animals, all losses inherent to the breeding process are already taken into account." Therefore, such assets already had their market value updated on the valuation date and are not subject to appraisal in this report . ▪ OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES For the other assets and liabilities, after analysis and discussion with the company's management, no application or need for market adjustment was identified, and their book balances were considered as the best estimate of their respective market values . 40

MARFRIG'S INTANGIBLE ASSETS ▪ CUSTOMER PORTFOLIO The intangible customer portfolio derives from the company's relationship with its clientele . This relationship has value for a business, as it represents a stable and recurring source of income . MARFRIG has its sales segmented by regions : North America and South America . MARFRIG's main customers are large retail chains, especially the main supermarket chains . To calculate the intangible value, the Multi - Period Excess Earnings Method (MPEEM) was used, with the identification of the contributory assets and the appropriate rates of return of these assets . The MPEEM aims to isolate the cash flow attributable to a specific asset from the total cash flow . In this method, debits are made against the total net income, by the use of contributory assets, and the excess profit is allocated to the intangible under evaluation . To calculate the customer portfolio, the company's cash flow projection estimated by management was used as a basis . The churn rate of MARFRIG's total portfolio was estimated according to calculations based on the company's total revenue history . However, after the economic and financial modeling of the customer portfolio, the customer portfolios of the North America and South America operations were segregated . Thus, it was observed that the contributory assets of North America have a contribution margin higher than the total margin of the company's operation in the same region, with the main contributory assets being fixed assets on the market and the marks of North America . In the rte . Based on this ; it was observed that MARFRIG's client portfolio in North America does not have a market value to be identified in the context of this report . On the other hand, under the same methodology and rationale of intangible described above, the customer portfolio of América do Sull was evaluated separately, and its fair value was identified in the context of this report . Thus, the MPEEM methodology was applied considering the revenues and operating margins of this operation only, with the identification of the contributing assets and the appropriate rates of economic remuneration of these assets . Further details of the evaluation are presented in Attachment 3 . ▪ BRANDS Trademarks, logos, and the like have value to a business, in part because they allow consumers to easily identify a business with its products and services . The characteristics of the brand, as perceived by the consumer public, can generate a consistent demand for the company's products or services . Branding can therefore enable revenue growth through increased units sold or charging higher prices than those charged by similar companies that do not have the benefit of that particular brand . MARFRIG has, on the valuation date, brands of products that are extremely relevant in the food sector as a whole . The brands were evaluated segregated between the brands operating in South America and North America, considering the main brands owned by the company . 41

Attachment 3 of this report details the main brands valuated, the methodology used and values found . The recognition of the fair value of the brands in the balance sheet to market was done in a consolidated manner, adding the value of the brands . ▪ SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS The relationship with suppliers is the intangible asset related to contracts for the supply of cattle for slaughter and deboning . In this sense, in possession of this contract, MARFRIG, in its operation in North America, enjoys favorable conditions in relation to the market in which it operates . Thus, to evaluate the relationship with suppliers, we use the With - and - Without method, which is based on the income approach to estimate the value of this intangible . This methodology consists of determining the difference in the cash flows generated by the asset, taking into account the effects of the existence and absence of the contract . Attachment 3 of this report details the two projected flows, with and without the contract, the methodology used and values found . ▪ GOODWILL AND SALES CHANNELS Goodwill and sales channels from previous acquisitions made by MARFRIG, which, according to the company, do not have or are not subject to tax deductibility in force on the valuation date, were written off the balance sheet due to the orderly settlement of the Adjusted Net Asset methodology . MARFRIG'S TANGIBLE ASSETS ▪ FIXED ASSETS The company's main physical assets consist of machinery and equipment, works in progress, buildings and facilities, as well as owned land owned by MARFRIG. The valuation criteria adopted to determine the market value of this group of MARFRIG's assets and the results obtained can be viewed in Attachment 4. ▪ INVENTORY According to the company's financial statement as of December 31 st , 2024, MARFRIG has a relevant finished product inventory balance (ready for sale/distribution). In this sense, from the perspective of an orderly liquidation of assets, it is necessary to determine the fair value of this inventory considering the sale flow. The first step in valuing inventory is the application of the gross sales margin on the value of finished products on the valuation date. Next, the cost of disposing of the product and a theoretical profit that would be charged for the disposing service provided by third parties are considered. Finally, the cost of storage is reduced to reach the market value of the inventory. According to the financial statement received, there was a stock of finished goods worth R$ 3.337.479 thousand. The cost of disposal, the profit over disposal effort and the cost of storage were estimated based on the company's historical results. 42

In addition, as informed by the company, considering that the product sold by MARFRIG has very short turnover days and due to the characteristic of a perishable product (beef), a 100 % use of the raw material was considered in the valuation . For the other components of the company's inventory on the base date, no additional adjustments were considered, given that they are stocks of raw materials intended for use in the production/handling of animals and other warehouse/spare materials . The premises and details of the evaluation can be found in Attachment 3 of this report . MARFRIG'S LIABILITIES ▪ CONTINGENCIES MARFRIG presents liabilities on provision for risks related to lawsuits classified as likely to be lost and supported by lawyers' opinions, in accordance with CPC 25 – Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets . On the base date, the probable contingencies can be seen in more detail in the company's public information, but they are mostly tax (in addition to civil and labor) . Based on CPC 25 , present obligations, resulting from past events, in which the outflow of funds are not likely to settle the obligations constitute contingent liabilities . Although they are not recognized in accounting, the fair values of contingent liabilities, referring to materialized contingencies with possible and remote probability of loss, should negatively impact the fair value measurement of shareholders' equity to market, considering that another company, with the same characteristics, but which does not appear as a defendant in lawsuits, tends to have a higher net worth in the market . Additionally, from the perspective of M&A transactions, it is common for the buyer to include protective clauses in a SPA, in order to protect itself against any liabilities not accounted for in the acquired company's balance sheet. This is because while these liabilities are classified as possible or remote from loss and do not appear on the balance sheet, they directly impact the value of the business. The measurement of the fair values of contingent liabilities, both possible and remote of loss, was based on opinions of the company's legal advisors, who considered the current status of the ongoing lawsuits and the percentages of probability of loss of each of the relevant causes, which are lower than the values attributed to the causes. Although these liabilities are not part of MARFRIG's accounting liabilities, as they do not meet the criteria established by CPC 25 for accounting recognition, the appraiser understands that they should be considered as market adjustments, impacting the company's fair price per share, through the Shareholders' Equity to Market methodology. That said, the fair values of the lawsuits related to MARFRIG, not only in cases with probable probability of loss (already accounted for on December 31 st , 2024 ), but also in the cases with possible and remote probability, as well as the probabilities of execution of these contingencies, were provided by MARFRIG's management and incorporated into this report . For the purposes of this assessment, we consider an increase in the contingencies considered relevant by MARFRIG, classified by management as a probability of possible or remote loss, which the company may assume . The result of this evaluation carried out by the company can be seen in the following table . 43

▪ DEFERRED TAXES Regarding the fair value adjustments of total assets net of the fair value adjustments of total liabilities, an Income Tax and Social Contribution liability on the capital gain must be constituted under the Lucro Real tax regime, as established by Law No . 9 , 249 / 95 (art . 15 , † 4 , and art . 20 ), considering that the parent company MARFRIG is headquartered in Brazil . Thus, a rate of 34 % of Income Tax and Social Contribution on the net fair value adjustments resulting from the difference between market - adjusted assets and liabilities was considered . ▪ OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES For the other assets and liabilities, after analysis and discussion with the company's management, no application or need for market adjustment was identified, and their book balances were considered as the best estimate of their respective market values . 44 APPRAISED MARFRIG CONTINGENCIES (BRL '000) 11,638,168 Capital gain of total contigencies Face value 12.3% Equivalent Probability 1,432,674 Capital gain 1,432,674 Total capital gain (BRL '000)

9. CONCLUSION In light of the examinations carried out in the aforementioned documentation and based on studies by APSIS, the experts concluded that the exchange ratio of MARFRIG shares for BRF shares, valuated according to the discounted cash flow methodology, as of December 31 st , 2024, is: The present consulting work did not take into account the assessment of the ESG (environmental, social and governance) potential of the analyzed assets. The negative and positive impacts of ESG on companies can be appraised in an independent report, to be contracted exclusively for this purpose, through the application of its own methodology. The Appraisal Report AP - 0047 5 /25 - 01 was prepared by APSIS (CREA/RJ 1982200620 and CORECON/RJ RF.02052), a company specialized in asset appraisal, legally represented below by its consultants, who are available for any clarifications that may be necessary. Rio de Janeiro, May 15 th , 2025. MIGUEL CORTÊS CARNEIRO MONTEIRO Director MARCELO DA LUZ NASCIMENTO Director 33,431,193,151 (A) BRF Shareholders' Equity (R$) 1,602,941,303 (B) BRF Shareholders' Equity at Market Value - Non - Controlling Interest (R$) 31,828,251,849 (C=A - B) BRF Shareholders' Equity - Controlling Interest (R$) 1,600,310,613 (D) Number of BRF Shares - Ex Treasury Shares 19.88879633 (E=C/D) Value per Share (R$) MARKET VALUE OF MARFRIG'S SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 9,354,818,698 (F) MARFRIG Shareholders' Equity (R$) 1,882,345,190 (G) MARFRIG Shareholders' Equity - Non - Controlling Interest (R$) 7,472,473,508 (H=F - G) MARFRIG's Shareholders' Equity - - Controlling Interest (R$) 849,668,056 ( I ) Number of Marfrig Shares - Ex Treasury Shares 8.79457978 (J = H/I) Value per Share (R$) EXCHANGE RATIO 2.26148341591578 MARFRIG Share per BRF Share EXCHANGE RATIO - BRF AND MARFRIG SHARES MARKET VALUE OF BRF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 45

10. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS 1. Market value of tangible and intangible assets and liabilities – BRF 2. Market valuation of fixed assets – BRF 3. Market value of tangible and intangible assets and liabilities – MARFRIG 4. Market valuation of fixed assets – MARFRIG 5. Glossary 46

ATTACHMENT 1

CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - VERTICAL BUSINESS UNIT DESCRIPTION The intangible customer relationship derives from the relationship with customers of one of BRF's business units . As such, this asset was valued separately . ▪ VALUATION METHODOLOGY We used the income approach and, specifically, the MPEEM to value the customer relationship . This method is based on the concept that the fair value of an intangible asset is equal to the present value of the cash flows attributable to that asset . For the cash flows to be realized, they must be net of the contribution of other assets, whether tangible or intangible . Using the analysis of the projected results of the company as a whole, the pre - tax cash flows associated with the customer relationship are calculated, considering the base date of the valuation . As with the company's cash flow, the cost of goods sold and other operating expenses are deducted from the projected revenue relating to the intangible, determining the net operating profit . The charges directly related to the customer relationship in question (Contributory Asset Charges or CAC) are then deducted from the identified contributory assets . After determining the value attributable to the customer relationship, it is necessary to consider the tax impact of amortizing the goodwill relating to this intangible . Amortization is an economic benefit for the acquirer that reduces its effective expenditure on the acquisition ; it must therefore be considered when determining the value . The present value of the tax amortization benefit of the customer relationship was calculated in accordance with current tax guidelines, which require compliance with the useful life of the asset. ▪ VALUATION CRITERIA The following steps were applied in the valuation of the fair value of the customer relationship, using the MPEEM: o Determining revenue - Revenue takes into consideration the existing customer relationship on the valuation date. Its evolution was projected according to the forecast inflation rate. New customers were not taken into account in the calculation. o Churn rate − To determine the churn rate, the historical loss of customers was calculated based on the turnover attributable to each of them over the last three years. The churn rate was applied to the revenue of the customer relationship, representing the loss of customers on an annual basis. o Cost and expenses − The costs and expenses considered were based on the company's cash flow and multiplied by the percentage of customers remaining each year. o Trademark CAC − The pre - tax charge for the brand was based on the royalty rate considered for the business unit and applied to projected net revenue year on year. o Income tax deduction - The tax rate of 34% was used, based on the Brazilian tax rate on the valuation date. 1

o Other CACs − In order to isolate the cash flows attributable solely to the customer relationship, we deducted the charges from contributory assets, determining the economic return on the assets that contribute to these flows . The post - tax contributory assets used are presented below . o CAC fixed assets (return on and return of) - The CAC on fixed assets represents a return on fixed assets based on their fair value on the valuation date . For the given business unit, an annual CAC after tax of 5 . 5 per cent was used and applied to projected net revenue year on year . The depreciation of these assets was also taken into account, since their maintenance charges must be added to the calculation . o Working capital CAC - Working capital is needed to support business operations . An annual CAC after tax of 5 . 5 per cent was applied, based on the company's financing rate . o Workforce CAC - The workforce is considered an element of goodwill, and not a separately identified intangible asset. However, it is understood as an asset that contributes to the company's cash flow generation; therefore, it is necessary to apply a CAC to the client relationship. For this, a rate of return equal to the company's discount rate was contemplated. o Integrated Supplier Relationship CAC − The integrated suppliers relationship was understood as an asset that contributes to generating the company's cash flow; therefore, it is necessary to apply a CAC to the customer relationship. For this, a rate of return equal to the company's discount rate was contemplated. o Discount rate application − The after - tax cash flows, after the adjustments described above, were brought to present value at the appropriate rate of return, given the nature of the asset. We determined a discount rate equal to the WACC calculated by APSIS for BRF. o Useful life definition − o The 7 - year useful life of the customer relationship was calculated based on an analysis of the historical churn rate presented by the customer base. o Tax amortization benefit (TAB) − We made the calculation in accordance with current tax guidelines, which require tax amortization according to the useful life of the asset. The result was added to the fair value of the customer relationship. 2

▪ DISCOUNT RATE – BRF BRF's discount rate was calculated using the WACC methodology, in which the cost of capital is determined by the weighted average of the market value of the components of the capital structure (own and third party), as shown in the table below. CAPITAL STRUCTURE 78% EQUITY 22% DEBT 100% EQUITY + DEBT 2.0% PROJECTED U.S. INFLATION 3.8% PROJECTED BR INFLATION COST OF EQUITY 3.3% RISK - FREE RATE (Rf) 0.60 BETA u 0.71 BETA r 6.2% RISK PREMIUM (Rm - Rf) 0.7% SIZE PREMIUM (Sp) 2.6% WEIGHTED COUNTRY RISK 11.0% Nominal Ke in US$ ( = ) 12.9% Nominal Ke in R$ ( = ) WACC 12.9% COST OF EQUITY 5.5% COST OF DEBT 11.3% NOMINAL DISCOUNT RATE ( = ) COST OF DEBT NOMINAL Kd IN R$ ( = ) 8.1% Nominal Kd With Tax Shield ( = ) 5.5% 3

The main assumptions used to define the discount rate are listed below. o Capital structure − It was based on the arithmetic mean of the comparable companies in the meat sector selected for the Beta sample. o o Risk - free rate (cost of equity) − Corresponds to the average yield of the 20 - year US T - Bond (Federal Reserve) between 01/01/2020 and 31/12/2024. Source: http://www.treas.gov/offices/domestic - finance/debt - management/interest - rate/yield_historical.shtml. o Beta u − Equivalent to the average weekly historical beta over a five - year period for the meat sector, in which BRF's segment is included. The sample of comparables was researched in the S&P Capital IQ database. o Beta r − Beta re - levered by the company's capital structure . o Risk premium − Corresponds to the spread between SP500 and US T - Bond 20 years. Source: Supply Side. o Size premium − Source: Duff and Phelps | Ibbotson 2024. o Weighted Country Risk - Corresponds to the average country risk, weighted according to each country's revenue share. Source: Damodaran and EMBI+. o Cost of debt − It is determined by BRF's weighted average cost of funding on the base date. o Tax shield − Weighted average projected rate for the company. Based on our calculations, it was estimated at 31.8 per cent. o US long - term inflation rate − Source: https:// www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomccalendars.htm. o BR long - term inflation rate − Fonte: https://www3.bcb.gov.br/expectativas2/#/consultas. ▪ CONCLUSION Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 1B, we concluded a fair value of R$ 364,155 thousand and a useful life of 7 years for the business unit's customer relationship. 4

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2035 2034 2033 2032 2031 2030 2029 2028 2027 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT 2025 2026 BRL '000 86,190,073 83,064,521 80,052,312 77,149,337 74,351,634 71,655,385 69,056,912 66,552,668 64,139,237 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 59,571,759 61,813,325 686,080 661,200 637,223 614,115 591,845 570,383 549,699 529,765 510,553 492,039 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 10.1% 12.4% 15.3% 18.8% 23.2% 28.6% 35.2% 43.4% 53.5% 65.9% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 11.2% 13.9% 17.1% 21.0% 25.9% 31.9% 39.3% 48.4% 59.7% 73.5% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 77,174 91,627 108,788 129,162 153,352 182,072 216,172 256,657 304,725 361,795 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (38,503) (45,713) (54,275) (64,440) (76,508) (90,837) (107,849) (128,048) (152,029) (180,502) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 38,671 45,914 54,513 64,722 76,844 91,235 108,322 128,609 152,696 181,294 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (6,079) (7,218) (8,570) (10,175) (12,080) (14,343) (17,029) (20,218) (24,005) (28,500) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 32,592 38,696 45,943 54,548 64,764 76,893 91,294 108,391 128,691 152,793 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (2,737) (3,437) (4,239) (6,767) (17,847) (21,099) (24,784) (28,759) (33,033) (38,097) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 29,855 35,259 41,704 47,781 46,917 55,794 66,509 79,632 95,659 114,697 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 38.7% 38.5% 38.3% 37.0% 30.6% 30.6% 30.8% 31.0% 31.4% 31.7% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 29,855 35,259 41,704 47,781 46,917 55,794 66,509 79,632 95,659 114,697 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (10,151) (11,988) (14,180) (16,245) (15,952) (18,970) (22,613) (27,075) (32,524) (38,997) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 19,704 23,271 27,525 31,535 30,965 36,824 43,896 52,557 63,135 75,700 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 25.5% 25.4% 25.3% 24.4% 20.2% 20.2% 20.3% 20.5% 20.7% 20.9% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 22,441 26,708 31,764 38,302 48,812 57,923 68,680 81,316 96,167 113,796 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 19,704 23,271 27,525 31,535 30,965 36,824 43,896 52,557 63,135 75,700 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 2,737 3,437 4,239 6,767 17,847 21,099 24,784 28,759 33,033 38,097 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 10,873 12,909 15,327 18,197 21,605 25,652 30,456 36,592 43,515 52,041 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 52 62 74 88 104 124 147 174 213 266 410 Working Capital - Return On 1,652 1,961 2,329 2,765 3,283 3,898 4,628 6,593 9,005 12,177 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 8,848 10,505 12,473 14,808 17,582 20,875 24,784 28,759 33,033 38,097 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 187 223 264 314 372 442 525 623 740 879 1,043 Workforce - Return On 133 158 187 222 264 313 372 442 524 623 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 11,569 13,799 16,437 20,105 27,207 32,271 38,225 44,725 52,652 61,756 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 10.50 9.50 8.50 7.50 6.50 5.50 4.50 3.50 2.50 1.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.32 0.36 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.62 0.69 0.76 0.85 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 3,747 4,975 6,598 8,986 13,538 17,879 23,577 30,714 40,256 52,569 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 1/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2044 2043 2042 2041 2040 2039 2038 2037 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT 2025 2036 BRL '000 120,180,052 115,821,906 111,621,801 107,574,006 103,672,998 99,913,455 96,290,246 92,798,426 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 59,571,759 89,433,233 956,643 921,952 888,519 856,298 825,245 795,319 766,478 738,683 711,896 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 1.5% 1.9% 2.3% 2.9% 3.6% 4.4% 5.4% 6.6% 8.2% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 1.7% 2.1% 2.6% 3.2% 4.0% 4.9% 6.0% 7.4% 9.1% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 16,462 19,545 23,205 27,551 32,711 38,838 46,111 54,747 65,000 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (8,213) (9,751) (11,577) (13,746) (16,320) (19,376) (23,005) (27,314) (32,429) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 8,249 9,794 11,628 13,806 16,391 19,461 23,106 27,433 32,571 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (1,297) (1,540) (1,828) (2,170) (2,577) (3,059) (3,632) (4,313) (5,120) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 6,952 8,254 9,800 11,635 13,815 16,402 19,474 23,121 27,451 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (407) (503) (623) (770) (950) (1,158) (1,398) (1,723) (2,133) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 6,545 7,751 9,178 10,865 12,864 15,244 18,076 21,397 25,317 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 39.8% 39.7% 39.5% 39.4% 39.3% 39.3% 39.2% 39.1% 38.9% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 6,545 7,751 9,178 10,865 12,864 15,244 18,076 21,397 25,317 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (2,225) (2,635) (3,120) (3,694) (4,374) (5,183) (6,146) (7,275) (8,608) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 4,320 5,116 6,057 7,171 8,490 10,061 11,930 14,122 16,710 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 26.2% 26.2% 26.1% 26.0% 26.0% 25.9% 25.9% 25.8% 25.7% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 4,727 5,619 6,680 7,941 9,441 11,219 13,328 15,846 18,843 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 4,320 5,116 6,057 7,171 8,490 10,061 11,930 14,122 16,710 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 407 503 623 770 950 1,158 1,398 1,723 2,133 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 2,319 2,754 3,269 3,882 4,609 5,472 6,496 7,713 9,158 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 11 13 16 19 22 26 31 37 44 410 Working Capital - Return On 352 418 497 590 700 831 987 1,172 1,391 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 1,887 2,241 2,660 3,159 3,750 4,453 5,287 6,277 7,452 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 40 47 56 67 79 94 112 133 158 1,043 Workforce - Return On 28 34 40 47 56 67 79 94 112 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 2,407 2,865 3,410 4,060 4,832 5,747 6,831 8,133 9,685 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 19.50 18.50 17.50 16.50 15.50 14.50 13.50 12.50 11.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.17 0.19 0.21 0.23 0.26 0.29 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 297 393 521 690 915 1,211 1,603 2,125 2,817 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 2/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2053 2052 2051 2050 2049 2048 2047 2046 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT 2025 2045 BRL '000 167,574,346 161,497,517 155,641,055 149,996,969 144,557,558 139,315,398 134,263,337 129,394,481 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 59,571,759 124,702,188 1,333,905 1,285,533 1,238,915 1,193,988 1,150,690 1,108,962 1,068,747 1,029,990 992,639 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.2% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 0.7% 0.8% 1.0% 1.3% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% 0.9% 1.1% 1.4% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 3,511 4,169 4,950 5,877 6,978 8,284 9,836 11,678 13,865 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (1,752) (2,080) (2,470) (2,932) (3,481) (4,133) (4,907) (5,826) (6,917) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 1,760 2,089 2,480 2,945 3,496 4,151 4,929 5,852 6,948 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (277) (328) (390) (463) (550) (653) (775) (920) (1,092) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 1,483 1,761 2,090 2,482 2,947 3,499 4,154 4,932 5,856 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (62) (77) (95) (117) (144) (178) (219) (269) (330) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 1,420 1,684 1,996 2,365 2,803 3,321 3,935 4,663 5,525 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 40.5% 40.4% 40.3% 40.2% 40.2% 40.1% 40.0% 39.9% 39.8% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 1,420 1,684 1,996 2,365 2,803 3,321 3,935 4,663 5,525 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (483) (572) (679) (804) (953) (1,129) (1,338) (1,585) (1,879) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 938 1,111 1,317 1,561 1,850 2,192 2,597 3,078 3,647 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 26.7% 26.7% 26.6% 26.6% 26.5% 26.5% 26.4% 26.4% 26.3% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 1,000 1,188 1,412 1,678 1,994 2,370 2,816 3,346 3,977 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 938 1,111 1,317 1,561 1,850 2,192 2,597 3,078 3,647 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 62 77 95 117 144 178 219 269 330 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 495 587 697 828 983 1,167 1,386 1,645 1,953 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 410 Working Capital - Return On 75 89 106 126 149 177 211 250 297 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 403 478 568 674 800 950 1,128 1,339 1,590 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 9 10 12 14 17 20 24 28 34 1,043 Workforce - Return On 6 7 9 10 12 14 17 20 24 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 505 601 715 850 1,011 1,202 1,430 1,701 2,024 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 28.50 27.50 26.50 25.50 24.50 23.50 22.50 21.50 20.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 24 31 42 55 73 96 128 169 224 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 3/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2061 2060 2059 2058 2057 2056 2055 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT 2025 2054 BRL '000 225,185,795 217,019,775 209,149,883 201,565,381 194,255,920 187,211,524 180,422,583 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 59,571,759 173,879,833 1,792,497 1,727,495 1,664,850 1,604,477 1,546,293 1,490,219 1,436,178 1,384,097 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 889 1,056 1,254 1,488 1,767 2,098 2,491 2,958 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (444) (527) (625) (743) (882) (1,047) (1,243) (1,476) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 446 529 628 746 885 1,051 1,248 1,482 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (70) (83) (99) (117) (139) (165) (196) (233) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 376 446 529 629 746 886 1,052 1,249 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (12) (15) (18) (22) (27) (33) (41) (51) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 364 431 512 607 719 853 1,011 1,198 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 40.9% 40.9% 40.8% 40.8% 40.7% 40.6% 40.6% 40.5% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 364 431 512 607 719 853 1,011 1,198 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (124) (147) (174) (206) (245) (290) (344) (407) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 240 285 338 400 475 563 667 791 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 27.0% 27.0% 26.9% 26.9% 26.9% 26.8% 26.8% 26.7% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 252 299 355 422 502 596 708 842 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 240 285 338 400 475 563 667 791 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 12 15 18 22 27 33 41 51 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 125 149 177 210 249 296 351 417 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 410 Working Capital - Return On 19 23 27 32 38 45 53 63 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 102 121 144 171 203 241 286 339 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 2 3 3 4 4 5 6 7 1,043 Workforce - Return On 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 127 150 179 213 253 301 357 425 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 36.50 35.50 34.50 33.50 32.50 31.50 30.50 29.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 3 3 4 6 8 10 14 18 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 4/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2069 2068 2067 2066 2065 2064 2063 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT 2025 2062 BRL '000 302,603,852 291,630,384 281,054,852 270,862,826 261,040,397 251,574,165 242,451,211 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 59,571,759 233,659,087 2,408,751 2,321,401 2,237,219 2,156,090 2,077,903 2,002,551 1,929,931 1,859,945 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 225 267 317 377 448 531 631 749 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (112) (133) (158) (188) (223) (265) (315) (374) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 113 134 159 189 224 266 316 375 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (18) (21) (25) (30) (35) (42) (50) (59) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 95 113 134 159 189 224 266 316 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (2) (3) (3) (4) (5) (6) (8) (10) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 93 110 131 155 184 218 259 307 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 41.2% 41.2% 41.2% 41.1% 41.1% 41.0% 41.0% 41.0% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 93 110 131 155 184 218 259 307 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (32) (37) (44) (53) (63) (74) (88) (104) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 61 73 86 102 121 144 171 202 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 27.2% 27.2% 27.2% 27.1% 27.1% 27.1% 27.1% 27.0% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 64 75 90 106 126 150 178 212 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 61 73 86 102 121 144 171 202 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 2 3 3 4 5 6 8 10 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 32 38 45 53 63 75 89 106 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 410 Working Capital - Return On 5 6 7 8 10 11 14 16 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 26 31 36 43 51 61 72 86 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1,043 Workforce - Return On 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 32 38 45 53 63 75 90 106 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 44.50 43.50 42.50 41.50 40.50 39.50 38.50 37.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 5/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2075 2076 2074 2073 2072 2071 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT 2025 2070 BRL '000 377,680,487 391,891,848 363,984,479 350,785,136 338,064,447 325,805,054 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 59,571,759 313,990,230 3,119,491 3,006,367 2,897,346 2,792,278 2,691,020 2,593,434 2,499,388 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 68 80 95 113 135 160 190 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (34) (40) (48) (57) (67) (80) (95) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 34 40 48 57 67 80 95 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (5) (6) (8) (9) (11) (13) (15) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 29 34 40 48 57 67 80 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 28 33 40 47 56 66 78 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 41.5% 41.4% 41.4% 41.4% 41.3% 41.3% 41.3% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 28 33 40 47 56 66 78 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (10) (11) (13) (16) (19) (22) (27) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 19 22 26 31 37 44 52 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 27.4% 27.4% 27.3% 27.3% 27.3% 27.3% 27.2% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 19 23 27 32 38 45 53 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 19 22 26 31 37 44 52 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 10 11 13 16 19 23 27 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 410 Working Capital - Return On 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 8 9 11 13 15 18 22 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,043 Workforce - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 10 11 13 16 19 23 27 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 51.50 50.50 49.50 48.50 47.50 46.50 45.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 6/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2083 2082 2081 2080 2079 2078 2077 2025 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT BRL '000 507,525,663 489,121,017 471,383,788 454,289,773 437,815,645 421,938,927 406,637,955 59,571,759 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 4,039,945 3,893,443 3,752,253 3,616,183 3,485,048 3,358,668 3,236,871 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 20 24 29 34 40 48 57 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (10) (12) (14) (17) (20) (24) (28) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 10 12 14 17 20 24 29 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (2) (2) (2) (3) (3) (4) (4) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 9 10 12 14 17 20 24 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 8 10 12 14 17 20 24 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 41.6% 41.6% 41.6% 41.6% 41.6% 41.5% 41.5% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 8 10 12 14 17 20 24 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (3) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 6 7 8 9 11 13 16 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 27.5% 27.5% 27.5% 27.4% 27.4% 27.4% 27.4% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 6 7 8 10 11 14 16 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 6 7 8 9 11 13 16 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 410 Working Capital - Return On 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,043 Workforce - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 58.50 57.50 56.50 55.50 54.50 53.50 52.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 7/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2090 2089 2088 2087 2086 2085 2084 2025 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT BRL '000 657,279,042 633,443,818 610,472,942 588,335,070 566,999,994 546,438,603 526,622,839 59,571,759 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 5,231,994 5,042,264 4,859,414 4,683,195 4,513,366 4,349,695 4,191,960 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 6 7 9 10 12 14 17 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (3) (4) (4) (5) (6) (7) (9) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 3 4 4 5 6 7 9 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (0) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 3 3 4 4 5 6 7 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 3 3 4 4 5 6 7 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 41.8% 41.8% 41.7% 41.7% 41.7% 41.7% 41.7% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 3 3 4 4 5 6 7 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (2) (2) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 27.6% 27.6% 27.6% 27.5% 27.5% 27.5% 27.5% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 410 Working Capital - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,043 Workforce - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 65.50 64.50 63.50 62.50 61.50 60.50 59.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 8/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2097 2096 2095 2094 2093 2092 2091 2025 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT BRL '000 851,219,496 820,351,317 790,602,525 761,932,528 734,302,205 707,673,853 682,011,138 59,571,759 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 6,775,776 6,530,063 6,293,260 6,065,044 5,845,105 5,633,141 5,428,864 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (1) (1) (1) (2) (2) (2) (3) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 41.9% 41.9% 41.9% 41.8% 41.8% 41.8% 41.8% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (0) (0) (0) (0) (1) (1) (1) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 27.6% 27.6% 27.6% 27.6% 27.6% 27.6% 27.6% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 410 Working Capital - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,043 Workforce - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 72.50 71.50 70.50 69.50 68.50 67.50 66.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 9/10

MPEEM (CARTEIRA VERTICAL) 2102 2101 2100 2099 2098 2025 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP - BUSINESS UNIT BRL '000 1,023,882,157 986,752,629 950,969,547 916,484,084 883,249,184 59,571,759 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 8,150,184 7,854,630 7,569,794 7,295,287 7,030,735 474,196 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUSTOMERS - BUSINESS UNIT 3.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% 18.8% Anual Churn Rate (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 81.2% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.6% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 1 1 1 1 2 429,554 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (0) (0) (1) (1) (1) (214,307) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 0 0 1 1 1 215,247 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% 50.1% gross margin (GP/NOR) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (33,838) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 0 0 0 1 1 181,409 EBITDA ( = ) 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% % EBITDA (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (44,052) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 0 0 0 1 1 137,357 EBIT ( = ) 41.9% 41.9% 41.9% 41.9% 41.9% 32.0% % EBIT - - - - - - TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 0 0 0 1 1 137,357 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (46,701) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% - 34.0% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 0 0 0 0 0 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 27.7% 27.7% 27.7% 27.7% 27.7% 21.1% net margin (NP/NOR) 0 0 0 0 0 134,708 BALANCE INPUT 0 0 0 0 0 90,655 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 0 0 0 0 0 44,052 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 0 0 0 0 0 62,548 BALANCE OUTPUT 0 0 0 0 0 410 Working Capital - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 16,303 Fixed Assets - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 44,052 Fixed Assets - Return Of 0 0 0 0 0 1,043 Workforce - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 739 Integrated Supplier Relationship - Return On 0 0 0 0 0 72,160 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 77.50 76.50 75.50 74.50 73.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 Discount Rate @ 12,9% 0 0 0 0 0 68,388 Discounted Cash Flow 35,793 Remaining Value 282,713 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 7 years Useful life of intangible 81,442 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 364,155 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 10/10

BRAND ▪ DESCRIPTION Trademarks, logos, and the like have value for a business, as they allow consumers to easily identify a business through its products and services . As they are perceived by the public, they have the ability to generate consistent demand for the company's items . They can, therefore, allow revenue growth by increasing the number of units sold or charging prices higher than those used by similar companies, but without the benefit of these assets in question . Below is a description of BRF's main brands . o Sadia: Sadia is a Brazilian brand founded in 1944, specializing in industrialized foods, with a focus on frozen and chilled products of animal origin, such as sausages, chicken and pork cuts, ready meals, pizzas, pasta and side dishes. It is widely distributed in national retail and present in international markets. o Perdigão: Created in 1934, Perdigão is a Brazilian brand that operates in the processed and frozen food segments, with a portfolio similar to Sadia's, including hams, sausages, lasagna, seasoned meats, ready meals and margarine. The brand shares distribution channels with other BRF brands. o Miss Daisy: Miss Daisy is a brand focused on the segment of refrigerated and frozen ready meals, such as roasted meats, side dishes and complete meals. Its presence is mainly concentrated in Brazilian retail, with a focus on convenience and offering ready - to - eat meals. o Nebraska: Nebraska is a brand used by BRF for products in the pork portfolio, such as ribs, loin and ham, aimed mainly at butchers and the food service channel, with specific cuts for professional use. o Gold: BRF's Gold is a line aimed at the institutional market and food service , focusing on meat and products with technical specifications aimed at establishments such as restaurants, hotels and industrial kitchens. The products in the line include standardized cuts and food inputs. o Qualy/ Claybon/ Deline: These three brands make up BRF's portfolio of margarines and vegetable creams. Qualy: It is a brand of margarine widely distributed in Brazil, with traditional, salt, unsalted and light versions . Claybon: It is mainly intended for culinary use, such as in baking and confectionery, being sold in larger formats. Deline : It is a regional brand of margarine, also focusing on domestic and culinary use. o Banvit: Banvit is a brand of Turkish origin acquired by BRF in 2017. It operates in the production and marketing of chicken meat and processed products, such as hamburgers, breaded meats and sausages, aimed at the market in Turkey and neighboring regions. The company operates with vertical integration in its production chain. ▪ VALUATION METHODOLOGY The fair value of the brand was estimated using the Royalty Relief Methodology, which is derived from the income approach . Through this model, also known as the Royalty Waiver Method, we calculate the value of the asset, capitalizing on the royalties that are saved by the company owning the intangible . In other words, the owner does not have to pay rent or royalties to a third party to use the asset . 1

Methodological application requires determining a hypothetical royalty rate, which is typically expressed as a percentage of revenue . The result is multiplied by the projected net revenue for the company for the entire useful life of the object of analysis . Subsequently, the cash flow from royalty payments is deducted from income tax and brought to present value at an appropriate risk rate to define the value of the intangible . ▪ VALUATION CRITERIA – BRAND The following steps were applied in the valuation of the fair value of the brand, using the Royalty Relief methodology : o Revenue attributable to the brand − 100% of the revenues from the business were considered to be generated under the company's brands. o Determination of the royalty rate − Information from the Markables and Royalty Source databases, as well as the internal APSIS database, was used to locate the transactions of licenses of use involving brands similar to BRF's brands. In addition, qualitative factors related to the intangible were appraised. After analysis, a royalty rate of 2.0% was concluded to be applied to the projected net operating revenue. o Income Tax Deduction − Royalty payments are deducted by the income tax rate weighted by the countries of operation, for the entire life of the asset. A tax deduction of 33.6% was used. o Application of the discount rate − Royalty savings are brought to present value at the appropriate rate of return. We determined a discount rate for the brands, equal to the WACC calculated by APSIS for BRF, shown in attachment 1A. o Tax benefit of amortization − As the asset does not have a defined useful life, it was not considered a tax benefit in this analysis. ▪ CONCLUSION Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 1 D, we concluded a fair value of R $ 10 , 753 , 098 thousand, without a defined useful life for BRF's brands . 2

RELIEF FROM ROYALTY (CONSOLIDA) 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 TRADEMARK BRL '000 69,056,912 66,552,668 64,139,237 61,813,325 59,571,759 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% Royalty Rate (% NOR) 1,346,610 1,297,777 1,250,715 1,205,360 1,161,649 TOTAL ROYALTIES 1,346,610 1,297,777 1,250,715 1,205,360 1,161,649 ROYALTIES SAVINGS - PRE TAX 33.6% 33.6% 33.6% 33.6% 33.6% IR/CSLL 894,595 862,154 830,890 800,759 771,720 ROYALTIES SAVINGS - AFTER TAX 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 4.50 3.50 2.50 1.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.62 0.69 0.76 0.85 0.95 11.3% Discount Rate @ 12,9% 551,795 592,065 635,273 681,635 731,381 Discounted Cash Flow 551,795 Remaining Value 7,560,949 3.8% Perpetuity @ 3.8% TRADEMARK VALUE 10,753,098 1/1

INVENTORY ▪ DESCRIPTION The inventory recorded in the BRF balance sheet on the valuation date of this Report comprises the following classifications : o Raw material; o Finished products; o Products in preparation; o Packaging materials; o Secondary materials; o Warehouse; o Imports in progress; and o Others. ▪ VALUATION METHODOLOGY According to good valuation practices, the value of the inventory must be measured separately between raw materials, products in preparation and finished products . o Raw material − The fair value of the raw material must be valuated based on the value that a market participant would be able to achieve with the sale of this material in the most advantageous scenario, on the valuation date of the Report, that is, according to the replacement cost . o Finished products − The valuation of finished products must consider the selling price less all expenses related to the disposal of items, such as marketing expenses, commissions, transportation and packaging, as well as a profit margin relative to the degree of risk of these costs . In addition, the time it takes for the company to sell the goods and the time to receive the money must also be considered . o Products in preparation – The fair value of products in preparation must be valuated in the same way as finished products ; however, the cost of completing the production of the good must also be considered . ▪ VALUATION CRITERIA Below, we detail the assumptions used in the valuation of BRF inventory on the valuation date of this Report, segmented by type of component classification . o Raw material − Following discussions with the company's management, the book value was considered a proxy for the fair value of the raw material . This material has a high inventory turnover, and there have been no significant variations in its cost, with the historical cost being close to the replacement cost . 1

o Finished products − For the valuation of finished products, the following assumptions were used. The sale value of the finished products was estimated by applying the company's gross margin, on the valuation date of this Report, to the respective book values of the items. The disposal costs applied in the valuation of the finished products were based on the marketing expenses paid by the customers informed in conversations with the company's management. Selling costs were estimated at 13.8% of the NOR of the valuation date. The profit margin applied to the sales effort was calculated by multiplying the sale value of the inventory by the company's profit margin before income tax (EBIT), on the valuation date of the Report, and the result was subsequently multiplied by the percentage that the disposal cost represents of the company's total costs. For the calculations of the storage cost, which is related tothe time between the sale of inventory and the receipt of cash, the number of days of inventory turnover and the company's accounts receivable on the valuation date of the Report was considered, multiplied by the return of pre - tax working capital. ▪ CONCLUSION Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 1F, we conclude a fair value of R$7,466,026 thousand and an indefinite useful life for BRF's inventory. 2

ESTOQUE_A_MERCADO December 2024 VALUATION OF INVENTORY PRODUCTS | BRL '000 BRF ASSUMPTIONS 30.6% Gross Margin Dec/24 9.7% EBIT margin Dec/24 13.8% Cost of Disposal (% of Revenue) Dec/24 1.9 Inventory period (months) Dec/24 5.5% Cost of Capital (Working Capital) (Kd post tax) FINISHED PRODUCTS 3,524,872 Book Value 5,075,830 Estimated Selling Price = TOTAL cost/(1 - Gross MARGIN) 700,400 ( - ) Cost of disposal = Sales x % Disposal Costs 74,920 ( - ) Profit on draining effort = Sales x EBIT x (% Outlet Cost/% Total Cost) 4,300,510 GROSS REALISABLE VALUE 37,615 ( - ) Storage costs = Gross Value x (Stocking Period/12 months) x Cost of Capital NET REALISABLE VALUE 4,262,896 Capital gain after inventory costs Capital gain (% of finished goods book balance) 738,024 20.9% 1/1

BALANÇO CONSOLIDADO BRF ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS MARKET VALUE ADJUSTMENTS ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS BALANCE SHEET BRF (BRL '000) BALANCES AT DEC 2024 BALANCES AT DEC 2024 31,568,239 738,024 30,830,215 CURRENTS ASSETS 11,165,364 - 11,165,364 Cash and cash equivalents 894,080 - 894,080 Bonds and securities 6,107,292 - 6,107,292 Accounts receivable 7,466,026 738,024 6,728,002 Inventory 2,214,189 - 2,214,189 Recoverable taxes 2,844,633 - 2,844,633 Biological assets 851 - 851 Prepaid expenses 875,804 - 875,804 Other current assets 63,499,107 31,654,240 31,844,867 NON - CURRENT ASSETS 9,974,145 - 9,974,145 LONG - TERM REALISABLE 2,331,012 - 2,331,012 Deferred taxes LT 4,545,723 - 4,545,723 Recoverable taxes LT 30,655 - 30,655 Accounts receivable LT 323,811 - 323,811 Bonds and securities LT 955,707 - 955,707 Other non current assets 1,787,237 - 1,787,237 Biological assets 129,323 - 129,323 INVESTIMENTS 129,323 - 129,323 Holdings in subsidiaries and associates 37,404,850 25,525,391 11,879,459 FIXED ASSETS 2,612,212 1,984,312 627,900 Land 15,578,119 10,134,901 5,443,218 Buildings and Facilities 18,397,962 13,403,704 4,994,258 Machinery and equipment 150,791 2,487 148,304 Furniture and Utensils 1,004 (13) 1,017 Vehicles 645,621 - 645,621 Fixed Assets in Progress 19,720 - 19,720 Advances to suppliers (579) - (579) Others 12,802,019 6,128,849 6,673,170 INTANGIBLE ASSETS - (3,771,263) 3,771,263 Goodwill 10,753,098 8,746,831 2,006,267 Trademark - (2,551) 2,551 Non - compete agreements 1,411,973 1,411,973 - Integrated Supplier Relationship 1,237 - 1,237 Patents 364,155 (256,141) 620,296 Customer relationship 233,865 - 233,865 Software 37,691 - 37,691 Other intangible assets 3,188,770 - 3,188,770 FIXED ASSETS RIGHT OF USE 3,188,770 - 3,188,770 Ridght of Use 95,067,346 32,392,264 62,675,082 TOTAL ASSETS 1/2

BALANÇO CONSOLIDADO BRF ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS MARKET VALUE ADJUSTMENTS ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS BALANCE SHEET BRF (BRL '000) BALANCES AT DEC 2024 BALANCES AT DEC 2024 20,820,572 - 20,820,572 CURRENT LIABILITIES 1,230,273 - 1,230,273 Loans and financing 14,573,097 - 14,573,097 Suppliers 1,141,944 - 1,141,944 Tax obligations 946,937 - 946,937 Wages, benefits and social charges payable 692,650 - 692,650 Provisions 2,235,671 - 2,235,671 Other payables 40,815,571 15,460,276 25,355,295 NON - CURRENT LIABILITIES 40,815,571 15,460,276 25,355,295 LONG - TERM LIABILITIES 19,510,275 - 19,510,275 Loans and financing LT 2,989,882 - 2,989,882 Suppliers LT 1,933 - 1,933 Deferred tax liabilities LT 8,277,200 6,737,736 1,539,464 Provision for contingencies LT 467,127 - 467,127 Benefits LT 846,614 846,614 Other non current liabilities 8,722,539 8,722,539 - Deferred income tax capital gains 33,431,193 16,931,988 16,499,205 SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY 13,349,156 - 13,349,156 Share capital 2,621,755 - 2,621,755 Capital reserve 2,079,253 - 2,079,253 Profit reserve (1,345,657) - (1,345,657) Treasury Shares (1,618,855) - (1,618,855) Other Comprehensive Income 1,602,941 189,388 1,413,553 Attributed to non - controlling shareholders 16,742,600 16,742,600 - Market Adjustments 95,067,336 32,392,264 62,675,072 TOTAL LIABILITIES 31,828,252 16,742,600 15,085,652 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY - CONTROLLING (BRL' 000) 2/2

ATTACHMENT 2

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF FIXED ASSETS The values below consider the valuation date of December 31 st , 2024 and are based on the fact that there are no impediments to the objects, whether debts, registrations without legal challenges, construction or tax irregularities (including deferred liabilities), environmental liabilities, among other obstacles: Company: BRF Valuation date: 31/12/2024 1 CAPITAL GAIN FAIR VALUE REPRODUCTION VALUE NET BOOK VALUE RUL ACCOUNTING BALANCE 13,403,704,301.79 R$ 18,519,461,091.76 R$ 23,984,346,577.76 R$ 5,115,756,789.97 R$ 4.9 Machinery and equipment 10,134,900,771.37 R$ 18,326,663,728.01 R$ 21,641,707,567.00 R$ 8,191,762,956.64 R$ 45.7 Buildings, improvements and leasehold improvements - R$ 665,341,235.47 R$ 665,341,235.47 R$ 665,341,235.47 R$ N/A Fixed assets under construction 2,486,756.40 R$ 150,730,906.39 R$ 273,727,759.76 R$ 148,244,149.99 R$ 6.4 Furniture and fixtures 13,106.70 - R$ 221,370,128.31 R$ 502,566,259.17 R$ 221,383,235.01 R$ 3.9 Vehicles 1,984,312,320.99 R$ 2,710,054,470.96 R$ 2,710,054,470.96 R$ 725,742,149.97 R$ N/A Lands 25,525,391,043.84 R$ 40,593,621,560.89 R$ 49,777,743,870.12 R$ 15,068,230,517.05 R$ Total R$ - R$ 3,188,770,000.00 N/A R$ 3,188,770,000.00 Right - of - use ASSETS 25,525,391,043.84 R$ 37,404,851,560.89 R$ 49,777,743,870.12 R$ 11,879,460,517.05 R$ Total excluding Right - of - use ASSETS

2. INTRODUCTION In the preparation of this work, data and information provided by third parties were used, in the form of documents and verbal interviews with the client. The estimates used in this process are based on: ▪ Analytical fixed assets for December 31 st , 2024; ▪ Third - party appraisal reports from BRF; ▪ Summary table of BRF's third - party reports containing the details of the appraisal by asset. 2

3. KEY STEPSS Analysis of documentation provided by management Discussions with the client to understand the documentation provided And sent of the report for independent internal review Implementation of any suggested improvements and changes Issuance of final report 3

4. CAVEATS AND PREMISES 1. CAVEATS During the performance of the work, some limitations and specific premises were adopted, as described below: 1. Simplified Methodology : The valuation was conducted based on a simplified methodology, according to objectives previously defined with the client. 2. Absence of Market Quotation : Market quotations were not made for all the items valuated. As a result, parameters and reference bases available internally or provided by third parties were used. 3. Failure to Reach the Percentage of 80% Quoted: The survey did not reach the minimum percentage of 80% of the items with values obtained through direct quotations or reliable external sources. 4. Absence of Physical Inspections : No physical inspections were carried out for the on - site verification of assets. Thus, the physical, functional and operational conditions of the assets were considered based on information provided by the company and/or third parties, without direct validation by the technical team responsible for the valuation. 5. Use of Third - Party Valuations: In this work, values and information from valuations carried out by third parties were considered. The veracity, accuracy and timeliness of these data were assumed to be correct, and were not subject to verification by the team responsible for this report. 4

2. ASSUMPTIONS The following assumptions were adopted for the valuation of each accounting class: 1. Equipment, tools, installations and others The mobile assets acquired between 2022 and 2024 were revalued using market indices published monthly by FGV. The selection of the indices took into account the asset category and its cost variation in the period valuated, ensuring the adherence of the values to the market. 2. Buildings and improvements For real estate, the INCC was applied as a factor for updating the original costs. This index reflects variations in construction costs and ensures the compatibility of the updated values with market conditions. 3. Land All land was held at the client's historical cost, since there is no specific index applicable for updating this type of asset. In the case of the valuations carried out for the land, the values calculated in each valuation were preserved. 4. Other entries In the cases of assets older than three years that were not valuated in the third - party report, as well as fixed assets in progress, right - of - use assets and leases, the book residual value was used as an approximation of the fair value, in view of the absence of specific valuations and the limitation of data. Assets registered with a symbolic value of R$ 0.01, usually corresponding to physical leftovers or residual components, were treated according to general procedures. Due to deadline restrictions, individual quotation of these items was not carried out. 5

5. VALUATION METHODOLOGY The methodology applied followed established technical procedures to ensure the proper measurement of the assets, as detailed below. 1. COST REPRODUCTION HISTORICAL COST METHOD When the value of the asset is determined from the monetary adjustment of its acquisition cost, the historical cost method is adopted, with the calculation of accounting records and the application of specific indexes, generally used by competent official bodies. The valuation of BRF's assets followed technical and methodological guidelines in line with the best market practices, considering the nature and specificities of the assets valuated. The main assumptions adopted were: ▪ Valuation criterion: we chose to use the historical cost method, considering the update of accounting costs incurred between 2022 and 2024 and the update of values from the third - party valuation mentioned above. ▪ Update indexes: market indexes released monthly by the Getúlio Vargas Foundation (FGV) were used for each type of asset. In the case of real estate, the National Construction Cost Index (INCC) was used. 6

5.2. DEPRECIATION OF ASSETS Straight - line depreciation The calculation of asset depreciation was carried out using the straight - line depreciation method, which assumes that the wear and tear of the asset operates in a linear manner over time, decreasing the value of the asset by a fixed amount each period, until the net value reaches zero. This model provides the present value, depreciated, relative to the age "x" of the improvement at the time of appraisal, through the formula below. ܖ ( ܖ — ܠ ) ۹ ܌ = ۾ ܌ + ۾ ܚ 7 Being: Kd = depreciation coefficient; Pd = depreciable portion, in decimal form; Pr = residual portion, in decimal form; n = service life; x = apparent age. 1. Asset age or operating age (x) The assets that were valued based on the third - party report had their fair values updated, and the corresponding depreciation was applied, taking into account the date of the previous valuation and the valuation date of the current work . For the other items not covered by this valuation, the age of the assets was based on the date of acquisition contained in the fixed asset analytical file sent by the company's management . 2. Estimated service life (n) According to primary concepts of mechanical design, every machine is formed by the composition of elements whose set, at the beginning of its operational life, obeys a law of decrease in its work capacity, which is generically represented by three cycles, described below . ▪ Break - in: adjustment cycle with loss of material, commonly followed by an improvement in the operation of the assembly. ▪ Operation : cycle in which the machine is at its normal production capacity and the loss of material in wear is slow and negligible. However, over the course of time called "operational useful life", the set loses its performance to the point where it must undergo partial or total reconditioning, before an irreversible collapse.

▪ Collapse: in this cycle, the removal of the material that occurred in the operation phase culminates in the collapse, making the machine unrecoverable, and only what is called "residual state or value" remains. 5.2.3. Residual value (Pr) The residual value is related to the operational useful life of the asset, representing the portion of the value that will not be depreciated at the end of this useful life, as indicated in the following table, by asset class: 8 RV EUL ACCOUNTING BALANCE 5% 14 Machinery and equipment 5% 60 Buildings, improvements and leasehold improvements N/A N/A Fixed assets under construction 2% 13 Furniture and fixtures 5% 5 Vehicles N/A N/A Lands

6. RESULT In accordance with the technical procedures applied and after carrying out the necessary due diligence, the appraisers determined the following fair values: 9 R$ - R$ 3,188,770,000.00 N/A R$ 3,188,770,000.00 Right - of - use ASSETS 25,525,391,043.84 R$ 37,404,851,560.89 R$ 49,777,743,870.12 R$ 11,879,460,517.05 R$ Total excluding Right - of - use ASSETS Company: BRF Valuation date: 31/12/2024 CAPITAL GAIN FAIR VALUE REPRODUCTION VALUE NET BOOK VALUE RUL ACCOUNTING BALANCE 13,403,704,301.79 R$ 18,519,461,091.76 R$ 23,984,346,577.76 R$ 5,115,756,789.97 R$ 4.9 Machinery and equipment 10,134,900,771.37 R$ 18,326,663,728.01 R$ 21,641,707,567.00 R$ 8,191,762,956.64 R$ 45.7 Buildings, improvements and leasehold improvements - R$ 665,341,235.47 R$ 665,341,235.47 R$ 665,341,235.47 R$ N/A Fixed assets under construction 2,486,756.40 R$ 150,730,906.39 R$ 273,727,759.76 R$ 148,244,149.99 R$ 6.4 Furniture and fixtures 13,106.70 - R$ 221,370,128.31 R$ 502,566,259.17 R$ 221,383,235.01 R$ 3.9 Vehicles 1,984,312,320.99 R$ 2,710,054,470.96 R$ 2,710,054,470.96 R$ 725,742,149.97 R$ N/A Lands 25,525,391,043.84 R$ 40,593,621,560.89 R$ 49,777,743,870.12 R$ 15,068,230,517.05 R$ Total

ATTACHMENT 3

CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP – LATIN AMERICA (LATAM) ▪ DESCRIPTION The intangible related to the customer relationship refers to the link established with the clientele of the Latin America business unit . In South America, MARFRIG has a structure composed of processing and slaughtering units, located in Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Uruguay, which serve the domestic and foreign markets of the Latin American region . Given this scenario, the specialists, together with the management, understood that there is a specific customer relationship linked to Latin American operations . ▪ VALUATION METHODOLOGY We employed the income approach and, specifically, the MPEEM to evaluate the customer relationship . This method is based on the concept that the fair value of an intangible asset is equal to the present value of the cash flows attributable to that asset . For cash flows to be realized, they must be net of the contribution of other assets, tangible or intangible . Using the analysis of the company’s overall projected results, the pre - tax cash flows associated with the customer relationship are calculated, considering the valuation date of the valuation . Similar to the company’s cash flow, the cost of goods sold, and other operating expenses are deducted from the projected revenue related to the intangible asset, resulting in the operating net profit . From this point, charges directly related to the specific customer relationship (Contributory Asset Charges or CAC) are deducted on the identified contributory assets . After determining the amount attributable to the customer relationship, it is necessary to consider the tax impact of the amortization of goodwill related to this intangible . Amortization is an economic benefit for the acquirer that reduces its effective expenditure on the acquisition ; Therefore, it must be taken into account in the valuation process . The present value of the tax amortization benefit of the customer relationship was calculated in accordance with current tax guidelines, which require compliance with the useful life of the asset . ▪ VALUATION CRITERIA The following steps were applied in the evaluation of the fair value of the customer relationship, using the MPEEM : o Revenue Determination − Revenue considers the existing customer relationship on the valuation date of the Report . Its evolution was projected according to the expected inflation rate . The entry of new customers was not considered in the calculation . To determine revenue, the net operating revenue (NOR) applied to the LATAM operation was considered, disregarding any effects of BRF's participation . o Churn rate − To determine the churn rate , the historical loss of customers was calculated based on the revenue attributable to each of them in the last three years . The churn rate was applied to the revenue of the customer relationship, representing the loss of customers annually . o Costs and expenses − The costs and expenses considered were based on the company's cash flow and multiplied by the percentage of remaining customers each year . 1

o CAC marca − The pre - tax charge of the trademark was based on the royalty rate considered for the portfolio of private labels in the operation of América do Súl, applied to the net revenue of América do Sul projected year by year . o Income Tax Deduction − The tax rate of 32 . 4 % was used, based on the LATAM tax rate, weighted by the rates of Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Uruguay, on the valuation date . o Other CACs − In order to isolate cash flows attributable solely to the customer relationship, we deduct charges from contributory assets, determining the economic return on the assets that contribute to such flows . The following is the post - tax contributory assets used . CAC fixed assets ( return on and return of ) − CAC on fixed assets represents a return on property, plant and equipment based on its fair value at the valuation date . For the customer relationship, an annual after - tax CAC of 5 . 0 % was used and applied to projected net revenue year - over - year . The depreciation of these assets was also considered, since their maintenance charges must be added to the calculation . CAC working capital − Working capital is necessary to support the operations of the business . An annual after - tax CAC of 5 . 0 % was applied, based on the company's financing rate . CAC workforce − Labor power is considered an element of goodwill , not a separately identified intangible asset . However, it is understood as an asset that contributes to the generation of the company's cash flow ; therefore, it is necessary to apply a CAC on the customer relationship . For this, a rate of return equal to the company's discount rate was contemplated . o Application of the discount rate − The after - tax cash flows, after the previously described adjustments, were brought to present value at the appropriate rate of return, given the nature of the asset . We have determined a discount rate equal to the WACC LATAM calculated by APSIS . o Determination of the useful life − The useful life of 05 years of the customer relationship was calculated based on the analysis of the historical churn rate presented by the clientele . o Tax benefit of amortization − We perform the calculation in accordance with the current tax guidelines, which require tax amortization according to the useful life of the asset . The result was added to the fair value of the customer relationship . ▪ CONCLUSION Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 3B, we concluded the fair value of R$ 1,806,977 thousand and the useful life of 05 years for the customer relationship of South America. 2

WORKING CAPITAL MPEEM 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 RETURN ON WORKING CAPITAL MARFRIG (BRL '000) 114,978,054 110,808,550 106,790,246 102,917,660 97,983,865 NET REVENUE (2,142,728) (2,065,025) (1,990,140) (1,892,333) (1,729,401) Initial Working Capital (80,627) (77,703) (74,885) (97,807) (162,932) Variation in Working Capital (2,223,354) (2,142,728) (2,065,025) (1,990,140) (1,892,333) Final Working Capital (2,183,041) (2,103,876) (2,027,582) (1,941,237) (1,810,867) Average Working Capital Balance (108,726) (104,783) (100,983) (96,683) (90,190) 5.0% Return on Working Capital ( Return On ) - 0.09% - 0.09% - 0.09% - 0.09% - 0.09% (% NOR) 1/4

FIXED ASSETS MKT VALUE (LATAM) 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 Valuation Date 31/12/2024 MARFRIG FIXED ASSETS (BRL '000) 873,266 738,009 681,768 578,590 553,874 - TOTAL INVESTIMENT (MAINTENANCE + EXPANSION) 266,750 194,848 131,493 75,251 24,716 - DEPRECIATION OF INVESTMENT 4,678,212 4,678,212 4,678,212 4,678,212 4,678,212 4,044,465 FIXED ASSET COST (ORIGINAL) 3,242,411 3,537,568 3,832,725 4,127,882 4,423,039 4,044,465 RESIDUAL VALUE 295,157 295,157 295,157 295,157 255,173 - DEPRECIATION OF ORIGINAL FIXED ASSET 561,907 490,005 426,650 370,408 279,889 255,173 TOTAL DEPRECIATION 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 31/12/2024 DEPRECIATION OF NEW FIXED ASSETS 49,432 49,432 49,432 49,432 24,716 2025 51,638 51,638 51,638 25,819 - 2026 60,846 60,846 30,423 - - 2027 65,866 32,933 - - - 2028 38,968 - - - - 2029 561,907 490,005 426,650 370,408 279,889 RETURN OF 266,750 194,848 131,493 75,251 24,716 DEPRECIATION OF INVESTMENT 295,157 295,157 295,157 295,157 255,173 DEPRECIATION OF ORIGINAL FIXED ASSET 292,199 278,270 265,741 254,203 242,196 5.0% RETURN ON 5,711,201 5,463,197 5,208,079 4,999,897 4,725,912 INITIAL BALANCE (561,907) (490,005) (426,650) (370,408) (279,889) DEPRECIATION 873,266 738,009 681,768 578,590 553,874 INVESTMENT (TOTAL) 6,022,561 5,711,201 5,463,197 5,208,079 4,999,897 FINAL BALANCE 5,866,881 5,587,199 5,335,638 5,103,988 4,862,904 AVERAGE BALANCE OF FIXED ASSETS 2/4

WORKFORCE (LATAM) Total Value 6 (M) Value per employee 5 (L) Training Cost 1 (k) Recruitment Cost 1 (J) Loss with Employee Replacement 4 (I) Lost productivity with employee replacement 3 (H) 1 WORKFORCE VALUATION (BRL '000) Total Employee Expense No. of months until reaching Initial (Annual) 2 full productivity¹ Productivity (E) (F) (G) 1 Other Benefits (D) Annual Charges 1 (C) Average Annual Salary per Employee 1 (B) 1 No of Emplyoees (A) Function 190,021 2,198 118 51 2,029 11% 100 3 13% 0 28 72 16150 TOTAL/ AVERAGE 20,805,279 TOTAL NET REVENUE 2024 190,021 Workforce Replacement Value 61,602 IR/ CSLL 128,420 POST - TAX WORKFORCE 1% (% Post - Tax Workforce/ Total Revenue) 3/4

INTANGIBLE MPEEM (LATAM) 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 CUSTOMER PORTFOLIO (BRL '000) 26,273,871 25,321,089 24,402,858 23,517,925 22,665,084 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 25,025,454 24,117,944 23,243,343 22,400,459 21,588,140 NET OPERATING REVENUE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CURRENT CUSTOMERS 31.9% 31.9% 31.9% 31.9% 31.9% Anual Churn Rate (%) 14.7% 21.5% 31.6% 46.4% 68.1% Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationships 18.1% 26.6% 39.0% 57.2% 84.1% Average Percentage of Remaining Customer Relationship 4,525,877 6,404,272 9,062,266 12,823,419 18,145,580 NET REVENUE FROM CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS 17.2% 25.3% 37.1% 54.5% 80.1% % of Remaining Customer Relationship/% of Total NOR (3,783,535) (5,353,832) (7,575,858) (10,720,100) (15,169,311) OPERATING COSTS ( - ) 742,342 1,050,440 1,486,408 2,103,319 2,976,269 GROSS PROFIT ( = ) 16.4% 16.4% 16.4% 16.4% 16.4% gross margin (GP/NOR) (331,456) (469,022) (663,683) (939,134) (1,330,060) GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ( - ) 410,886 581,417 822,726 1,164,185 1,646,208 EBITDA ( = ) 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% % EBITDA (96,793) (123,933) (158,441) (201,969) (224,078) DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( - ) 314,093 457,484 664,285 962,216 1,422,131 EBIT ( = ) 6.9% 7.1% 7.3% 7.5% 7.8% % EBIT (67,718) (95,824) (135,594) (191,870) (271,502) TRADEMARAK ROYALTY ( - ) 246,375 361,660 528,691 770,346 1,150,628 ADJUSTED EBIT ( = ) (79,870) (117,244) (171,392) (249,733) (373,013) IR/CSSL ( - ) - 32.4% - 32.4% - 32.4% - 32.4% - 32.4% Effective tax rate (IRCS/EBIT) 166,504 244,417 357,299 520,614 777,615 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX ( = ) 3.7% 3.8% 3.9% 4.1% 4.3% net margin (NP/NOR) 263,297 368,350 515,740 722,583 1,001,693 BALANCE INPUT 166,504 244,417 357,299 520,614 777,615 NON OPERATING PROFIT AFTER TAX 96,793 123,933 158,441 201,969 224,078 DEPRECIATION/AMORTIZATION ( + ) 145,642 192,214 254,156 336,452 412,487 BALANCE OUTPUT (4,280) (6,056) (8,569) (12,047) (16,702) Working Capital - Return On 50,334 70,381 98,686 138,607 193,901 Fixed Assets - Return On 96,793 123,933 158,441 201,969 224,078 Fixed Assets - Return Of 2,796 3,956 5,598 7,922 11,210 Workforce - Return On 117,655 176,136 261,584 386,131 589,206 SIMPLE BALANCE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 4.50 3.50 2.50 1.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.58 0.65 0.74 0.83 0.94 Discount Rate @ 12.9% 68,245 115,311 193,286 322,024 554,607 Discounted Cash Flow 114,294 Remaining Value 1,367,766 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - PRE - TAB 5 years Useful life of intangible 439,210 TAX BENEFIT FROM AMORTIZATION 1,806,977 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP VALUE - POST - TAB 4/4

BRAND ▪ DESCRIPTION Trademarks, logos, and the like have value for a business, as they allow consumers to easily identify a business by its products and services . As they are perceived by the public, they have the ability to generate consistent demand for the company's items . They can, therefore, allow revenue growth by increasing the number of units sold or charging prices higher than those used by similar companies, but without the benefit of the asset in question . Below is a description of MARFRIG's main brands : o Bassi Angus: Bassi Angus is MARFRIG’s certified line of premium Angus beef products. o Bassi: With a 45 - year history, Bassi is MARFRIG’s traditional premium meat line. o Montana Steakhouse: This brand specializes in products for grilling, barbecuing, and stovetop preparation.. o Montana: Montana is a product line designed for everyday meat consumption. o GJ: Present in over 100 countries, GJ is MARFRIG’s brand dedicated to the international market. It offers a broad portfolio of beef products, including whole cuts, portioned cuts, steaks, giblets, and Frozen Cooked Beef, which comprises cooked and frozen meat items. o Pampeano: Pampeano includes a range of canned meat products made from selected raw materials and subject to the company’s quality control. The key strengths of these products are their practicality and versatility, as they are ready for immediate consumption. o Viva: Viva is a brand focused on meat produced with an emphasis on environmental sustainability. Its products carry the "Carbon Neutral Meat" seal, developed by EMBRAPA (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation), certifying efforts to offset greenhouse gas emissions. o Others: MARFRIG also owns other brands targeting specific niches, such as Plant Plus, dedicated to vegan food, and Bona Pet, which offers bones and snacks for the pet segment. ▪ VALUATION METHODOLOGY The fair value of the brand was estimated using the Royalty Relief Methodology, which is derived from the income approach . Through this model, also known as the Royalty Waiver Method, we calculate the value of the asset, capitalizing on the royalties that are saved by the company owning the intangible . In other words, the owner does not have to pay rent or royalties to a third party to use the asset . Methodological application requires determining a hypothetical royalty rate, which is typically expressed as a percentage of revenue . The result is multiplied by the projected net revenue for the company for the entire useful life of the object of analysis . Subsequently, the cash flow from royalty payments is deducted from income tax and brought to present value at an appropriate risk rate to define the value of the intangible . 1

For valuation purposes, the brands were segmented into value - added brands (appraised brands) and non - value - added or third - party brands, as informed by MARFRIG's management. In addition, a proportion was made based on the representativeness of the revenue attributed to each of these brands. Below, we present the revenue representativeness of each brand appraised. o South America: The brands appraised, together represent about 76.73% of the company's LATAM revenue. o North America: The brands appraised, together, represent about 19.51% of the company's North American revenue. ▪ VALUATION CRITERIA – SOUTH AMERICA The following steps were applied in the valuation of the fair value of the brand, using the Royalty Relief methodology : o Revenue attributable to the brand – For theS ul, 76.73% of the revenues from the business were considered to be generated under the appraised brands – LATAM. o Determination of the royalty rate − Information from the Markables and Royalty Source databases, as well as the internal APSIS database, was used to locate the transactions of use licenses involving brands in the meat and poultry food sector. In addition, qualitative factors related to the intangible were appraised. After analysis, a royalty rate of 2.0% was concluded to be applied on the projected NOR. o Income Tax Deduction − Royalty payments are deducted at the American - weighted income tax rate for the life of the asset. A tax deduction of 32.4% was used, a weighted rate between Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Uruguay. o Application of the discount rate − Royalty savings are brought to present value at the appropriate rate of return. We have determined a discount rate for LATAM brands equal to the WACC calculated by APSIS for the LATAM operation. o Tax benefit of amortization − As the asset does not have a defined useful life, it was not considered a tax benefit in this analysis. ▪ CONCLUSION – SOUTH AMERICA Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 3D, we concluded a fair value of R$ 2,674,617 thousand, without a defined useful life for MARFRIG's LATAM brands. 2

▪ VALUATION CRITERIA – NORTH AMERICA The following steps were applied in the valuation of the fair value of the brand, using the Royalty Relief methodology : o Revenue attributable to the brand – For theNorth American economy, 19.51% of the revenues from the business were considered to be generated under the appraised brands. o Determination of the royalty rate − Information from the Markables and Royalty Source databases, as well as the internal APSIS database, was used to locate the transactions of use licenses involving brands operating in the meat sector. In addition, qualitative factors related to the intangible were appraised. After analysis, a royalty rate of 0.6% was concluded to be applied to the projected NOR. o Income Tax Deduction − Royalty payments are deducted at the U.S. income tax rate for the life of the asset. A tax deduction of 26.5% was used, which takes into account the U.S. income tax rate (21%), plus the Delaware state rate (5.5%), which is levied on income. o Application of the discount rate − Royalty savings are brought to present value at the appropriate rate of return. We have determined a discount rate for the brands of NorthAmerica, equal to the WACC calculated by APSIS for the operation of MARFRIG in NorthAmerica. o Tax benefit of amortization − As the asset does not have a defined useful life, it was not considered a tax benefit in this analysis. ▪ CONCLUSION – NORTH AMERICA Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 3D, we conclude a fair value of R$ 1,249,209 thousand, without a defined useful life for the brands of América do Norte. 3

RELIEF FROM ROYALTY 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 MARFRIG TRADEMARK (BRL '000) 26,273,871 25,321,089 24,402,858 23,517,925 22,665,084 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) - CASH FLOW 6,113,784 5,892,077 5,678,410 5,472,491 5,274,039 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) - THIRD PARTY TRADEMARK CASH FLOW 20,160,087 19,429,012 18,724,448 18,045,435 17,391,044 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) - OWN TRADEMARK CASH FLOW 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% Royalty rate (% of NOR) 393,122 378,866 365,127 351,886 339,125 TOTAL ROYALTIES 393,122 378,866 365,127 351,886 339,125 ROYALTIES SAVINGS - PRE TAX 32.4% 32.4% 32.4% 32.4% 32.4% IR and CSLL tax rates 265,679 256,044 246,759 237,811 229,187 ROYALTIES SAVINGS - AFTER TAX 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 4.50 3.50 2.50 1.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.58 0.65 0.74 0.83 0.94 12.9% Discount Rate @ 12.9% 154,105 167,625 182,332 198,328 215,729 Discounted Cash Flow 154,105 Balance to be carried into perpetuity 1,756,498 3.8% Perpetuity @ 3.8% TRADEMARK VALUE 2,674,617 1/2

RELIEF FROM ROYALTY (AN) 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 MARFRIG TRADEMARK (BRL '000) 88,704,183 85,487,461 82,387,388 79,399,735 75,318,782 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) - CASH FLOW 71,401,833 68,812,554 66,317,171 63,912,280 60,627,344 REVENUE – THIRD - PARTY TRADEMARK WITH NO TRADEMARK PREMIUM 17,302,350 16,674,907 16,070,217 15,487,455 14,691,437 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% Royalty rate (% of NOR) 103,814 100,049 96,421 92,925 88,149 TOTAL ROYALTIES 103,814 100,049 96,421 92,925 88,149 ROYALTIES SAVINGS - PRE TAX 26.5% 26.5% 26.5% 26.5% 26.5% IR and CSLL tax rates 76,303 73,536 70,870 68,300 64,789 ROYALTIES SAVINGS - AFTER TAX 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 4.50 3.50 2.50 1.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.67 0.73 0.80 0.88 0.96 Discount Rate @ 9.3% 9.3% 51,210 53,926 56,786 59,798 61,981 Discounted Cash Flow 51,210 Balance to be carried into perpetuity 965,507 Perpetuity @ 3.8% 3.8% TRADEMARK VALUE 1,249,209 2/2

INVENTORY ▪ DESCRIPTION The inventory recorded in MARFRIG's balance sheet on the valuation date of this Report comprises the following classifications : o Raw material; o Finished products; o Products in preparation; o Packaging materials; o Secondary materials; o Warehouse; o Imports in progress; and o Others. ▪ VALUATION METHODOLOGY According to good valuation practices, the value of the inventory must be measured separately between raw materials, products in preparation and finished products . o Raw material − The fair value of the raw material must be evaluated based on the value that a market participant would be able to achieve with the sale of this material in the most advantageous scenario, on the valuation date of the Report, that is, according to the replacement cost . o Finished products − The valuation of finished products must consider the selling price less all expenses related to the disposal of items, such as marketing expenses, commissions, transportation and packaging, as well as a profit margin relative to the degree of risk of these costs . In addition, the time it takes for the company to sell the goods and the time to receive the money must also be considered . o Products in preparation – The fair value of products in preparation must be evaluated in the same way as finished products ; however, the cost of completing the production of the good must also be considered . ▪ VALUATION CRITERIA Below, we detail the assumptions used in the valuation of MARFRIG's inventory on the valuation date of this Report, segmented by type of component classification . o Raw material − Following discussions with the company's management, the book value was considered a proxy for the fair value of the raw material . This material has a high inventory turnover, and there have been no significant variations in its cost, with the historical cost being close to the replacement cost . 1

o Finished products − For the valuation of finished products, the following assumptions were used. The sale value of the finished products was estimated by applying the company's gross margin, on the valuation date of this Report, to the respective book values of the items. The disposal costs applied in the valuation of the finished products were based on the marketing expenses paid by the customers informed in conversations with the company's management. Selling costs were estimated at 3.4%. The profit margin applied to the sales effort was calculated by multiplying the sale value of the inventory by the company's profit margin before income tax (EBIT), on the valuation date of the Report, and the result was subsequently multiplied by the percentage that the disposal cost represents of the company's total costs. For the calculations of the storage cost, which is related to the time between the sale of inventory and the receipt of cash, the number of days of inventory turnover and the company's accounts receivable on the valuation date of the Report was considered, multiplied by the return of pre - tax working capital . ▪ CONCLUSION Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 3F, we conclude a fair value of R$3,432,154 thousand and an indefinite useful life for MARFRIG's inventory. 2

VALUATION OF INVENTORY 31/12/24 VALUATION OF INVENTORY | BRL '000 MARFRIG PREMISES 6.8% Gross Margin 1.3% EBIT margin 3.4% Runoff Cost (% of Revenue) 0.70 Inventory Period (months) 10.0% Cost of Capital (Working Capital) FINISHED PRODUCTS 3,337,479 Book Value 0.2% ( - ) Slow Moving/Obsolete 3,331,482 Adjusted Book Value 3,573,633 Estimated Sale Price 119,751 = TOTAL cost/(1 - Gross MARGIN) ( - ) Runoff Cost 1,638 = Sales x % Disposal Costs ( - ) Profit over Drainage Effort = Sales x EBIT x (% Disposal Cost/% Total Cost) GROSS REALIZABLE VALUE 3,452,243 ( - ) Storage Cost = Gross Value x (Storage Period/12 months) x Cost of Capital 20,089 3,432,154 NET REALIZABLE VALUE 100,673 Capital Gain Before Storage Cost 4% Capital Gain % (before Storage Cost) 1/1

SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS ▪ DESCRIPTION In MARFRIG's operating sector, especially in North America, the relationship with suppliers is mostly contractual, ensuring the requested delivery, both in quantity and quality, of high value - added beef products . In addition, it brings more predictability as to the volume available to be traded in future years and, in this way, it is understood that it is possible to measure the expectation of future economic benefit . Therefore, it has been identified as a relevant intangible asset for this valuation . ▪ VALUATION METHODOLOGY To evaluate the relationship with suppliers, we use the With and Without method , which is based on the income approach to estimate the value of this intangible . This methodology consists of determining the difference in the cash flows generated by the asset, considering the effects of the existence and absence of the contract . Cash flows with the contract are projected considering the valuation of the company under current conditions, while cash flows without the contract consider the following factors: o Loss of volume and, consequently, loss of revenue caused by the absence of the supply contract; and o Loss of margin generated by the increase in additional cost arising from the purchase of cattle heads on the spot market, outside the supply contract. Among the factors analyzed, the probability of renewal of current supply contracts was also taken into account, with a decreasing effect over the projected period. After determining the value attributable to the relationship with suppliers, it is necessary to contemplate the tax impact of the amortization of goodwill related to this asset. The abatement is an economic benefit for the acquirer that reduces its effective expenditure on the acquisition; Therefore, it must be taken into account in the calculation of the value. The present value of the benefit was defined in accordance with current tax guidelines, which require tax amortization according to the useful life of the intangible. Thus, the fair value of the relationship with suppliers is the present value of the difference between the cash flows with and without this asset, multiplied by the probability of renewal and plus the tax benefit of amortization. ▪ VALUATION CRITERIA To estimate the impact of the lack of a relationship with suppliers on the projection of cash flow, the following factors were considered : o Net revenue − As a starting point, we consider the expectation of NOR for the meatpacking operation of América do Norte . In this sense, MARFRIG's management indicated that the purchases of head of cattle under the current supply contracts for the meatpacking operation have a percentage of representativeness over the total of about 80 % . Therefore, to obtain the NOR that is linked to the relationship with suppliers, these and percentage of representativeness were applied to the total NOR of North America . o Loss of revenue – For the scenario without the supply contract, MARFRIG's management estimates that there will be a loss of around 10 % of the volume of cattle for the meatpacking operation, which implies a loss of revenue proportional to the reduced percentage . 1

o Additional Costs − It was considered that the absence of the contract would imply an additional effort for the acquisition of cattle in the spot market, which, according to MARFRIG's management, contributes to a 1% increase in unit cost, reducing the resulting EBIT margin. o Income Tax Deduction – A tax deduction of 26.5% was considered, which takes into account the U.S. income tax rate (21%), plus the Delaware state rate (5.5%), which is levied on income. o Application of the discount rate − Cash flows after tax, after the adjustments described above, were brought to present value by MARFRIG's discount rate for operations in North America. o Probability of renewal − After meetings with the company's management, a probability of non - renewal of 10% p.a. was considered, as informed by MARFRIG, cumulatively. o Useful life − A useful life of 15 years was considered for the relationship with suppliers. o Tax benefit of amortization − We perform the calculation in accordance with the tax guidelines in force in North America, which require tax amortization according to the useful life of the asset. The result was added to the fair value of the relationship with suppliers. ▪ CONCLUSION Based on the analyses described above and the calculations shown in Attachment 3H, we concluded the fair value of R$ 4,007,978 thousand and the useful life of 15 years for the relationship with suppliers. 2

SCENARIO 2039 2038 2037 2036 2035 2034 2033 2032 2031 2030 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 'WITH' SCENARIO | BRL '000 MARFRIG 128,339,672 123,685,629 119,200,358 114,877,739 110,711,872 106,697,075 102,827,868 99,098,972 95,505,298 92,041,944 88,704,183 85,487,461 82,387,388 79,399,735 75,318,782 NET OPERATING INCOME (NOR) 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 5.4% 12.5% (% NOR growth) 118,062,091 113,780,749 109,654,663 105,678,203 101,845,944 98,152,656 94,593,299 91,163,017 87,857,129 84,671,124 81,600,655 78,641,531 75,789,716 73,041,317 69,287,171 NET OPERATING REVENUE (NOR) - SLAUGHTER/DEBONING 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% % NOR Total 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 5.4% 94,449,672 91,024,599 87,723,730 84,542,563 81,476,755 78,522,125 75,674,640 72,930,414 70,285,703 67,736,899 65,280,524 62,913,225 60,631,773 58,433,054 55,429,737 RECEITA OPERACIONAL LÍQUIDA (ROL) - ABATE/DESOSSA (CONTRATO) 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% % NOR Total 1,842,645 1,775,825 1,711,427 1,649,365 1,589,553 1,531,910 1,476,358 1,422,820 1,371,224 1,321,498 1,273,576 1,227,392 1,182,882 1,139,987 1,077,870 EBITDA ( + ) 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.9% Ebitda margin (Ebitda/NOR) (1,771,014) (1,706,791) (1,644,897) (1,585,247) (1,527,760) (1,472,358) (1,418,966) (1,367,509) (1,317,918) (1,270,126) (1,224,067) (1,123,968) (1,035,766) (957,468) (810,871) DEPRECIATION / AMORTIZATION ( - ) - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.8% - 1.7% - 1.6% - 1.5% (%NOR) 71,632 69,034 66,531 64,118 61,793 59,552 57,392 55,311 53,305 51,372 49,509 103,424 147,116 182,519 266,999 EBIT ( = ) 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.4% (% NOR) (18,982) (18,294) (17,631) (16,991) (16,375) (15,781) (15,209) (14,657) (14,126) (13,614) (13,120) (27,407) (38,986) (48,368) (70,755) INCOME TAX/SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION ( - ) - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% Effective Corporate Income Tax Rate (CIT/EBIT) 52,649 50,740 48,900 47,127 45,418 43,771 42,183 40,654 39,179 37,759 36,389 76,017 108,131 134,152 196,245 NET OPERATING INCOME / NOPAT ( = ) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% Net margin (LL/NOR) 1,842,645 1,775,825 1,711,427 1,649,365 1,589,553 1,531,910 1,476,358 1,422,820 1,371,224 1,321,498 1,273,576 1,227,392 1,182,882 1,139,987 1,077,870 EBITDA ( + ) (18,982) (18,294) (17,631) (16,991) (16,375) (15,781) (15,209) (14,657) (14,126) (13,614) (13,120) (27,407) (38,986) (48,368) (70,755) INCOME TAX/SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION ( - ) 66,231 63,830 61,515 59,284 57,134 55,062 53,066 51,141 49,287 47,499 45,777 44,117 42,517 55,531 92,171 VARIATION WORKING CAPITAL ( - ) (1,758,961) (1,695,175) (1,633,702) (1,574,458) (1,517,363) (1,462,338) (1,409,309) (1,358,202) (1,308,949) (1,261,482) (1,215,736) (1,027,435) (949,137) (805,496) (768,287) FIXED AND INTANGIBLE INVESTMENTS ( - ) 130,933 126,185 121,609 117,199 112,949 108,853 104,906 101,102 97,435 93,902 90,497 216,666 237,277 341,654 331,000 FREE CASH FLOW "WITH" 2039 2038 2037 2036 2035 2034 2033 2032 2031 2030 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 'WITHOUT' SCENARIO | BRL '000 MARFRIG 128,339,672 123,685,629 119,200,358 114,877,739 110,711,872 106,697,075 102,827,868 99,098,972 95,505,298 92,041,944 88,704,183 85,487,461 82,387,388 79,399,735 75,318,782 ADJUSTED NET OPERATING INCOME 106,255,882 102,402,674 98,689,197 95,110,383 91,661,350 88,337,391 85,133,970 82,046,716 79,071,416 76,204,012 73,440,589 70,777,378 68,210,744 65,737,185 62,358,454 NET OPERATING REVENUE (ROS) - SLAUGHTER/DEBONING 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% 82.8% % NOR Total 85,004,705 81,922,139 78,951,357 76,088,306 73,329,080 70,669,912 68,107,176 65,637,373 63,257,133 60,963,209 58,752,471 56,621,903 54,568,595 52,589,748 49,886,763 NET OPERATING REVENUE (LIST) - SLAUGHTER/DEBONING (CONTRACT) 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% 80.0% % NOR Total 1,658,381 1,598,242 1,540,284 1,484,428 1,430,598 1,378,719 1,328,722 1,280,538 1,234,101 1,189,349 1,146,219 1,104,653 1,064,594 1,025,988 970,083 EBITDA ( + ) 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.9% Ebitda margin (Ebitda/NOR) Basis – Additional Costs (98,075,393) (101,765,774) (105,595,016) (109,568,345) (113,691,183) (117,969,155) (122,408,098) (94,518,838) (91,091,256) (87,787,970) (84,604,473) (81,536,421) (78,579,627) (75,730,056) (71,837,715) NB Costs – FLOW (R$ thousand) 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,043,198 2,011,112 NB Volume – FLOW (000) Tons 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 46 45 43 41 40 38 37 36 Unit Costs – FLOW (R$ thousand / (000) Tons) 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% Unit Costs – FLOW (R$ thousand / (000) Tons) 0.60 0.58 0.56 0.54 0.52 0.50 0.48 0.46 0.45 0.43 0.41 0.40 0.38 0.37 0.36 Additional Cost for loss of contract (R$ thousand / (000) Tons) 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,691,618 1,332,043 Volume Contract 1,013,450 976,699 941,280 907,146 874,250 842,546 811,993 782,547 754,169 726,820 700,463 675,062 650,582 626,990 475,811 Additional Costs 644,931 621,544 599,004 577,282 556,348 536,173 516,729 497,991 479,932 462,528 445,755 429,591 414,012 398,999 494,272 ADJUSTED EBITDA ( + ) 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.8% Ebitda margin (Ebitda/NOR) (1,593,912) (1,536,112) (1,480,407) (1,426,722) (1,374,984) (1,325,123) (1,277,069) (1,230,758) (1,186,127) (1,143,113) (1,101,660) (1,011,571) (932,189) (861,721) (729,784) ADJUSTED DEPRECIATION ( - ) - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.9% - 1.8% - 1.7% - 1.6% - 1.5% (%NOR) (948,981) (914,568) (881,403) (849,440) (818,636) (788,950) (760,340) (732,767) (706,194) (680,585) (655,905) (581,981) (518,177) (462,722) (235,512) EBIT AJUSTADO ( = ) - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.6% - 0.6% - 0.3% (% NOR) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME TAX/CONTRIB. SOCIAL ADJUSTED ( - ) - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% - 26.5% Effective Corporate Income Tax Rate (CIT/EBIT) (948,981) (914,568) (881,403) (849,440) (818,636) (788,950) (760,340) (732,767) (706,194) (680,585) (655,905) (581,981) (518,177) (462,722) (235,512) ADJUSTED OPERATING NET INCOME / NOPAT ( = ) - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.7% - 0.6% - 0.6% - 0.3% Net margin (LL/NOR) 1/2

SCENARIO 2039 2038 2037 2036 2035 2034 2033 2032 2031 2030 2029 2028 2027 2026 2025 'WITH' SCENARIO | BRL '000 MARFRIG 644,931 621,544 599,004 577,282 556,348 536,173 516,729 497,991 479,932 462,528 445,755 429,591 414,012 398,999 494,272 ADJUSTED EBITDA ( + ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME TAX/CONTRIB. SOCIAL ADJUSTED ( - ) 59,608 57,447 55,363 53,356 51,421 49,556 47,759 46,027 44,358 42,749 41,199 39,705 38,265 49,978 82,954 VARIATION ADJUSTED WORKING CAPITAL ( - ) (1,583,065) (1,525,657) (1,470,332) (1,417,012) (1,365,627) (1,316,104) (1,268,378) (1,222,382) (1,178,054) (1,135,334) (1,094,163) (924,692) (854,223) (724,947) (691,458) FIXED AND INTANGIBLE INVESTMENTS ADJUSTED ( - ) (878,525) (846,667) (815,964) (786,374) (757,858) (730,375) (703,889) (678,364) (653,764) (630,056) (607,208) (455,396) (401,946) (275,970) (114,232) FREE CASH FLOW "WITHOUT" 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial Period 14.50 13.50 12.50 11.50 10.50 9.50 8.50 7.50 6.50 5.50 4.50 3.50 2.50 1.50 0.50 Mid - Year Convention 0.28 0.30 0.33 0.36 0.39 0.43 0.47 0.51 0.56 0.61 0.67 0.73 0.80 0.88 0.96 Discount Factor @ 9.3% 36,224 38,145 40,169 42,299 44,543 46,905 49,393 52,013 54,772 57,677 60,736 158,887 190,125 299,128 316,654 NPV | FREE CASH FLOW "WITH" (243,054) (255,945) (269,520) (283,816) (298,869) (314,721) (331,414) (348,992) (367,502) (386,994) (407,520) (333,954) (322,071) (241,619) (109,281) NPV | FREE CASH FLOW "WITHOUT" 279,278 294,091 309,689 326,115 343,412 361,626 380,807 401,004 422,274 444,671 468,256 492,841 512,196 540,748 425,935 NPV | DIFERENTIAL FLOW "WITH/WITHOUT" 21% 23% 25% 28% 31% 35% 39% 43% 48% 53% 59% 66% 73% 81% 90% % PROBABILITY OF CONTRACT RENEWAL 22.9% 25.4% 28.2% 31.4% 34.9% 38.7% 43.0% 47.8% 53.1% 59.0% 65.6% 72.9% 81.0% 90.0% 100.0% Beginning of Period 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% Probability Contract Cancellation 20.6% 22.9% 25.4% 28.2% 31.4% 34.9% 38.7% 43.0% 47.8% 53.1% 59.0% 65.6% 72.9% 81.0% 90.0% End of Period 57,501 67,278 78,719 92,104 107,766 126,091 147,532 172,619 201,972 236,316 276,500 323,353 373,391 438,006 383,341 ADJUSTED NPV | DIFFERENTIAL FLOW "WITH/WITHOUT" 3,420,627 CASH FLOW VARIANCE WITH AND WITHOUT 3,420,627 VALUE OF INTANGIBLE | PRE - TAB 15.0 anos Intangible Asset Useful Life 587,351 TAX BENEFIT RESULTING FROM AMORTIZATION 4,007,978 VALUE OF INTANGIBLE | POST - TAB 673,338 VALUE OF INTANGIBLE | POST - TAB (USD thousands) 2/2

CONTINGENCIES APPRAISED MARFRIG CONTINGENCIES (BRL '000) 11,638,168 Capital gain of total contigencies Face value 12.3% Equivalent Probability 1,432,674 Capital gain 1,432,674 Total capital gain (BRL '000) 1/1

ATTACHMENT 4

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FIXED ASSETS The values below consider the valuation date of December 31 st , 2024 and are based on the fact that there are no impediments to the objects, whether debts, registrations without legal challenges, construction or tax irregularities (including deferred liabilities), environmental liabilities, among other obstacles: Company: Marfrig Valuation date: 31/12/2024 1 CAPITAL GAIN FAIR VALUE REPRODUCTION VALUE NET BOOK VALUE RUL ACCOUNTING BALANCE 88,180,915.05 R$ 671,893,442.87 R$ 1,002,804,791.31 R$ 583,712,527.82 R$ 10 Others 465,299,966.50 R$ 4,317,010,891.98 R$ 5,006,944,049.01 R$ 3,851,710,925.48 R$ 52 Land, buildings and improvements 1,224,256,003.93 R$ 4,599,195,366.60 R$ 6,750,962,737.66 R$ 3,374,939,362.67 R$ 10 Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures 126,338,090.97 - R$ 121,822,771.01 R$ 124,747,104.88 R$ 248,160,861.98 R$ 47 Buildings and structures 832,423.30 R$ 8,671,011.02 R$ 16,419,059.34 R$ 7,838,587.72 R$ 3 IT equipment 56,807,806.85 - R$ 49,987,230.80 R$ 50,024,728.29 R$ 106,795,037.66 R$ 6 Improvements 133,999,383.89 R$ 318,602,546.78 R$ 322,250,208.89 R$ 184,603,162.89 R$ 4 Machinery and equipment 2,492,811.96 - R$ 2,697,073.34 R$ 2,805,565.01 R$ 5,189,885.30 R$ 6 Furniture and fixtures 3,129,043.75 R$ 4,122,966.05 R$ 4,224,721.51 R$ 993,922.30 R$ 1 Vehicles 37,646,250.62 - R$ 47,699,762.04 R$ 47,699,762.04 R$ 85,346,012.66 R$ N/A Land - R$ 1,446,324,594.33 R$ 1,488,722,282.76 R$ 1,446,324,594.33 R$ N/A Construction in progress 1,692,412,776.03 R$ 11,588,027,656.84 R$ 14,817,605,010.70 R$ 9,895,614,880.81 R$ 28 Total

2. INTRODUCTION In the preparation of this work, data and information provided by third parties were used, in the form of documents and verbal interviews with the client. The estimates used in this process are based on: 2 ▪ Analytical fixed assets of all group companies for 31/12/2024; ▪ Listing of owned and leased units; ▪ Vehicle listing; ▪ Appraisal reports prepared by third parties from the following units: o Marfrig (Brazil) Planta Promissão 1; Planta Promissão 2; Planta Varzea Grande. o Pampeano (Brasil) Planta Pampeano. o Tacuarembo (Uruguay) Frigorifico Tacuarembo S.A.; Cledinor S.A.; Establecimientos colonia S.A.; Inaler S.A.; o National Beef (United States of America) Dodge; Liberal; Hummels; Moultrie; St. Joe; KC Corporate; National Carries; Tama; Ohio. o MFG Holdings (Argentina) Planta Pilar; Planta Baradero; Planta Arroyo Seco; Planta San Jorge; Planta Estancias del Sur .

3. KEY STEPSS Analysis of documentation provided by management Discussions with the client to understand the documentation provided And sent of the report for independent internal review Implementation of any suggested improvements and changes Issuance of final report

4. CAVEATS AND PREMISES 1. CAVEATS During the performance of the work, some limitations and specific premises were adopted, as described below: 1. Simplified Methodology : The valuation was conducted based on a simplified methodology, according to objectives previously defined with the client. 2. Absence of Market Quotation : Market quotations were not made for all the items valuated. As a result, parameters and reference bases available internally or provided by third parties were used, 3. Failure to Reach the Percentage of 80% Quoted: The survey did not reach the minimum percentage of 80% of the items with values obtained through direct quotations or reliable external sources. 4. Absence of Physical Inspections : No physical inspections were carried out for the on - site verification of assets. Thus, the physical, functional and operational conditions of the assets were considered based on information provided by the company and/or third parties, without direct validation by the technical team responsible for the valuation. 5. Use of Third - Party Valuations: In this work, values and information from valuations carried out by third parties were considered. The veracity, accuracy and timeliness of these data were assumed to be correct, and were not subject to verification by the team responsible for this report.

2. ASSUMPTIONS The following assumptions were adopted for the valuation of each accounting class: 1. Equipment, tools, installations and others The mobile assets acquired between 2022 and 2024 were revalued using market indices published monthly by FGV for entries made in BRL and the Consumer Price Indexes (CPI) corresponding to entries made in other currencies. The selection of the indices took into account the asset category and its cost variation in the period valuated, ensuring the adherence of the values to the market. 2. Buildings and improvements For real estate, the INCC was applied as a factor for updating the original costs for the entries made in BRL and the Consumer Price Indexes (CPI) corresponding to the entries made in other currencies. This index reflects variations in construction costs and ensures the compatibility of the updated values with market conditions. 3. Land All land was held at the client's historical cost, since there is no specific index applicable for updating this type of asset. In the case of the valuations carried out for the land, the values calculated in each valuation were preserved. 4. Other entries In the case of assets older than three years that were not valuated by third parties, as well as works in progress, the book residual value was used as an approximation of the fair value, given the absence of specific valuations and the limitation of data. Assets registered with a symbolic value of R$ 0.01, usually corresponding to physical leftovers or residual components, were treated according to general procedures. Due to deadline restrictions, individual quotation of these items was not carried out.

5. VALUATION METHODOLOGY The methodology applied followed established technical procedures to ensure the proper measurement of the assets, as detailed below. 1. COST REPRODUCTION HISTORICAL COST METHOD When the value of the asset is determined from the monetary adjustment of its acquisition cost, the historical cost method is adopted, with the calculation of accounting records and the application of specific indexes, generally used by competent official bodies. The valuation of MARFRIG's assets followed technical and methodological guidelines in line with the best market practices, considering the nature and specificities of the assets valuated. The main assumptions adopted were: ▪ Valuation criteria: The historical cost method was adopted, based on the update of the valuations carried out by third parties for the units of each controlled company. The updated values were prorated by unit and/or accounting class. For the other assets, the accounting costs incurred between 2022 and 2024 were updated through specific indexes. ▪ Update indexes: For the launches incurred in BRL, market indexes released monthly by Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) were used for each type of asset. In the case of real estate, the National Construction Cost Index (INCC) was used. For the others, the Consumer Price Indexes (CPI) of each currency released by the Central Bank of the respective countries were considered.

5.2. DEPRECIATION OF ASSETS Straight - line depreciation The calculation of asset depreciation was carried out using the straight - line depreciation method, which assumes that the wear and tear of the asset operates in a linear manner over time, decreasing the value of the asset by a fixed amount each period, until the net value reaches zero. This model provides the present value, depreciated, relative to the age "x" of the improvement at the time of appraisal, through the formula below. ܖ ( ܖ — ܠ ) ۹ ܌ = ۾ ܌ + ۾ ܚ Being: Kd = depreciation coefficient; Pd = depreciable portion, in decimal form; Pr = residual portion, in decimal form; n = service life; x = apparent age. 1. Asset age or operating age (x) The assets that were valuated through third - party reports had their fair values updated and the appropriate relative depreciation applied considering the base date of the previous report and the valuation date of this work . For the other items not covered by this valuation, the age of the assets was based on the date of acquisition contained in the fixed asset analytical file sent by the company's management . 2. Estimated service life (n) According to primary concepts of mechanical design, every machine is formed by the composition of elements whose set, at the beginning of its operational life, obeys a law of decrease in its work capacity, which is generically represented by three cycles, described below . ▪ Break - in: adjustment cycle with loss of material, commonly followed by an improvement in the operation of the assembly. ▪ Operation : cycle in which the machine is at its normal production capacity and the loss of material in wear is slow and negligible. However, over the course of time called "operational useful life", the set loses its performance to the point where it must undergo partial or total reconditioning, before an irreversible collapse.

▪ Collapse: in this cycle, the removal of the material that occurred in the operation phase culminates in the collapse, making the machine unrecoverable, and only what is called "residual state or value" remains. 5.2.3. Residual value (Pr) The residual value is related to the operational useful life of the asset, representing the portion of the value that will not be depreciated at the end of this useful life, as indicated in the following table, by asset class: RV EUL ACCOUNTING BALANCE 5% 13 Others 5% 60 Land, buildings and improvements 5% 14 Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures 5% 60 Buildings and structures 2% 5 IT equipment 5% 10 Improvements 5% 14 Machinery and equipment 2% 13 Furniture and fixtures 5% 5 Vehicles N/A N/A Construction in progress N/A N/A Land

6. RESULTS In accordance with the technical procedures applied and after carrying out the necessary due diligence, the appraisers determined the following fair values: CAPITAL GAIN FAIR VALUE REPRODUCTION VALUE NET BOOK VALUE RUL ACCOUNTING BALANCE 88,180,915.05 R$ 671,893,442.87 R$ 1,002,804,791.31 R$ 583,712,527.82 R$ 10 Others 465,299,966.50 R$ 4,317,010,891.98 R$ 5,006,944,049.01 R$ 3,851,710,925.48 R$ 52 Land, buildings and improvements 1,224,256,003.93 R$ 4,599,195,366.60 R$ 6,750,962,737.66 R$ 3,374,939,362.67 R$ 10 Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures 126,338,090.97 - R$ 121,822,771.01 R$ 124,747,104.88 R$ 248,160,861.98 R$ 47 Buildings and structures 832,423.30 R$ 8,671,011.02 R$ 16,419,059.34 R$ 7,838,587.72 R$ 3 IT equipment 56,807,806.85 - R$ 49,987,230.80 R$ 50,024,728.29 R$ 106,795,037.66 R$ 6 Improvements 133,999,383.89 R$ 318,602,546.78 R$ 322,250,208.89 R$ 184,603,162.89 R$ 4 Machinery and equipment 2,492,811.96 - R$ 2,697,073.34 R$ 2,805,565.01 R$ 5,189,885.30 R$ 6 Furniture and fixtures 3,129,043.75 R$ 4,122,966.05 R$ 4,224,721.51 R$ 993,922.30 R$ 1 Vehicles 37,646,250.62 - R$ 47,699,762.04 R$ 47,699,762.04 R$ 85,346,012.66 R$ N/A Land - R$ 1,446,324,594.33 R$ 1,488,722,282.76 R$ 1,446,324,594.33 R$ N/A Construction in progress 1,692,412,776.03 R$ 11,588,027,656.84 R$ 14,817,605,010.70 R$ 9,895,614,880.81 R$ 28 Total Company: Marfrig Valuation date: 31/12/2024

ATTACHMENT 5

A ABL Gross Leasable Area. ABNT (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas) Brazilian Technical Standards Association. Allocated Codes Serial number (grades or weights) to differentiate the quality features of properties. Allotment Subdivision of a tract of land into lots for buildings with the opening of new thoroughfares, or the extension, modification or expansion of existing ones. Amortization Systematic allocation of the depreciable value of an asset over its useful life. Apparent Age Estimated age of a property according to its characteristics and conservation status at the time of inspection. Asset A resource controlled by the entity as a result of past events from which future economic benefits are expected for the entity. Asset Approach Valuation of companies where all assets (including those not accounted for) have their values adjusted to the market. Also known as 1 market net equity. BDI (Budget Difference Income) A percentage that indicates the benefits and overhead costs applied to the direct cost of construction. Best Use of the Property The most economically appropriate use of a certain property according to its characteristics and surroundings, respecting legal limitations. Beta A systematic risk measure of a share ; price trend of a particular share to be correlated with changes in a given index . Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) The BOMA Standard measures buildings on a buildingwide basis . It introduces the concept of Building Common Area (areas common to all of the tenants in a building) . Building Standard The quality of the improvements according to the specifications of design, materials, workmanship and performance effectively used in construction. Book Value The value at which an asset or liability is recognized on the balance sheet. Business Combination Union of separate entities or businesses producing financial statements of a single reporting entity. Transaction or other event by which an acquirer obtains control of one or more businesses, regardless of the legal form of operation. Business Risk Uncertainty of realization of expected future returns of the business resulting from factors other than financial leverage. GLOSSARY B Basic Infrastructure Urban rainwater drainage equipment, street lighting, sewage system, drinking water, public and home electricity supply and access routes. C CAPEX (Capital Expenditure) Fixed asset investments. CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing Model) Model in which the capital cost for any share or lot of shares equals the risk free rate plus risk premium provided by the systematic risk of the share or lot of shares under investigation. Generally used to calculate the Cost of Equity or the Cost of Shareholder Capital. Capital Structure Composition of a company’s invested capital, between own capital (equity) and third - party capital (debt) . Cash Flow Cash generated by an asset, group of assets or business during a given period of time. Usually the term is supplemented by a qualification referring to the context (operating, nonoperating, etc.) Cash Flow on Invested Capital Cash flow generated by the company to be reverted to lenders (interest and amortizations) and shareholders (dividends) after consideration of cost and operating expenses and capital investments. Cash - Generating Unit Smallest identifiable group of assets generating cash inflows that are largely independent on inputs generated by other assets or groups of assets. Casualty An event that causes financial loss. CFC (Conselho Federal de Contabilidade) Brazilian Accounting Committee. Company Commercial or industrial entity, service provider or investment entity holding economic activities. Conservation Status Physical status of an asset as a result of its maintenance. Control Power to direct the strategic policy and administrative management of a company. Control Premium Value or percentage of the pro - rata value of a lot of controlling shares over the pro - rata value of noncontrolling shares, which reflect the control power . Cost The total direct and indirect costs necessary for production, maintenance or acquisition of an asset at a particular time and situation. Cost of Capital Expected rate of return required by the market as an attraction to certain investment funds.

CPC (Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis) Accounting Pronouncements Committee. Current Value Value replacement with a new value depreciated as a result of the physical state the property is in. CVM Securities and Exchange Commission. EBITDA (Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Economic Benefits Benefits such as revenue, net profit, net cash flow, etc. Efficient Use That which is recommendable and technically possible for the location on a reference date, among the various uses permitted by the applicable law, observing surrounding marketing trends. Electrical Damage Value Estimated cost of the repair or replacement of parts, when the property suffers electrical damage. Values are tabulated in percentages of the Replacement Value and have been calculated through the study of equipment manuals and the expertise in corrective maintenance of Apsis technicians. Fair Value Less Cost to Sell Value that can be obtained from the sale of an asset or cash - generating unit less sale expenses, in a transaction between knowledgeable, willing and uninterested parties. E EBIT (Earnings before Interest and Taxes) Earnings before interest and taxes. F Facilities Set of materials, systems, networks, equipment and operational support services for a single machine, production line or plant, according to the degree of aggregation. Fair Market Value Value at which an asset could have its ownership exchanged between a potential seller and a potential buyer, when both parties have reasonable knowledge of relevant facts and neither is under pressure to do so. Enterprise Set of properties capable of producing revenue through marketing or economic exploitation. It can be: real estate (e.g. subdivision, commercial/ residential buildings), real - estate based (e.g., hotel, shopping mall, theme parks), industrial or rural. Enterprise Value Economic value of the company. Equity Value Economic value of the equity. Equivalent Construction Area Constructed area on which the unit cost equivalence of corresponding construction is applied, according to ABNT postulates. Equivalent Depth Numerical result of the division of a lot area by its main projected front. Expertise Technical activity performed by a professional with specific expertise to investigate and clarify facts, check the status of property, investigate the causes that motivated a particular event, appraise assets, their costs, results or rights. Dichotomous Variable Variable that assumes only two values. Direct Production Cost Spending on inputs, including labor, in the production of goods. Discount Rate Any divisor used to convert a flow of future economic benefits into present value. Financial Lease That which substantially transfers all the risks and benefits related to the ownership of the asset, which may or may not eventually be transferred. Leases that are not financial leases are classified as operating leases. Fixed Asset Tangible asset available for use in the production or supply of goods or services, in third - party leasing, investments, or for management purposes, expected to be used for more than one accounting period. Forced Liquidation Conditiononthepossibility ofacompulsorysaleorinashorter period than theaverageabsorptionbythemarket. G Goodwill See Premium for Expected Future Profitability. H Homogenization Treatment of observed prices by application of mathematical transformations that express, in relative terms, the differences between market data attributes and those of the property assessed. FCFF (Free Cash Flow to Firm) Free cash flow to firm, or unlevered free cash flow. D Data Treatment Application of operations to express, in relative terms, the attribute differences between the market data and data of the property being assessed. Date of Issue Closing date of the valuation report, when conclusions are conveyed to the client. DCF (Discounted Cash Flow) Discounted cash flow. D&A Depreciation and amortization. Dependent Variable Variable to be explained by the independent ones. Depreciable Value Cost of the asset, or other amount that substitutes such cost (financial statements), less its residual value. Depreciation Systematic allocation of the depreciable value of an asset during its useful life. 2

I IAS (International Accounting Standards) Principles - based standards, interpretations and the framework adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). See International Accounting Standards. IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) International Accounting Standards Board. Standard setting body responsible for the development of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). Ideal Fraction Percentage owned by each of the buyers (tenants) of the land IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) International Financial Reporting Standards, a set of international accounting pronouncements published and reviewed by the IASB. IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) International Financial Reporting Standards, a set of international accounting pronouncements published and reviewed by the IASB. Impairment See Impairment losses. Impairment Losses (impairment) Book value of the asset that exceeds, in the case of stocks, its selling price less the cost to complete it and expense of selling it; or, in the case of other assets, their fair value less expenditure for sale. Income Approach Valuation method for converting the present value of expected economic benefits. Independent Variables Variables that provide a logical content to the formation of the value of the property subject to the assessment. Indirect Production Cost Administrative and financial costs, benefits and other liens and charges necessary for the production of goods. Insurance Risk transfer guaranteed by contract whereby one party undertakes, subject to payment of premium, to indemnify another for the occurrence of casualties covered under the policy. Insurance Value Value at which an insurance company assumes the risks. Except in special cases, it is not applied to land and foundations. Intangible Asset Identifiable non - monetary asset without physical substance. This asset is identifiable when: a) it is separable, i.e., capable of being separated or divided from the entity and sold, transferred, licensed, leased or exchanged, either alone or together with the related contract, asset or liability; b) it arises from contractual or other legal rights, regardless of whether those rights are transferable or separable from the entity or from other rights and obligations. Internal Rate of Return Discount rate where the present value of future cash flow is equivalent to the cost of investment. International Accounting Standards (IAS) Standards and interpretations adopted by the IASB. They include: International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) International Accounting Standards (IAS) and interpretations developed by the Interpretation Committee on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRIC) or by the former Standing Interpretations Committee (SIC). Investment Property Property (land, building or building part, or both) held by the owner or lessee under the lease, both to receive payment of rent and for capital appreciation or both, other than for use in the production or supply of goods or services, as well as for administrative purposes. Investment Value Value for a particular investor based on individual interests in the property in question. In the case of business valuation, this value can be analyzed by different situations, such as the synergy with other companies of an investor, risk perceptions, future performance and tax planning. IVSC International Valuation Standards Council. Key Variables Variables that, a priori, and traditionally have been important for the formation of property value . K Key Money Amount paid by the prospective tenant for signature or transfer of the lease contract, as compensation for the point of sale. L Levered Beta Beta value reflecting the debt in capital structure. Liability Present obligation that arises from past events, whereby it is hoped that the settlement thereof will result in the inflow of funds from the entity embodying economic benefits. Liquidity Ability to rapidly convert certain assets into cash or into the payment of a certain debt. M Market Approach Valuation method in which multiple comparisons derived from the sales price of similar assets are adopted. 3 Market Data Set of information collected on the market related to a particular property. Market Research Set of activities for identification, investigation, collection, selection, processing, analysis and interpretation of results on market data. Homogenization Area Useful or private area, or built with mathematical treatments for valuation purposes, according to criteria based on the real estate market.

Maximum Insurance Value Maximum value of the property for which it is recommendable to insure it. This criterion establishes that the property whose depreciation is greater than 50% should have its Maximum Insurance Value equivalent to twice as much as the Current Value; and the property whose depreciation is with less than 50% should have its Maximum Insurance Value equivalent to the Replacement Value. Multiple Market value of a company, share or invested capital, divided by a valuation measurement of the company (EBITDA, income, customer volume, etc.). N Net Debt Cash and cash equivalents, net position in derivatives, short - term and long - term financial debts, dividends receivable and payable, receivables and payables related to debentures, short - term and long - term deficits with pension funds, provisions, and other credits and obligations to related parties, including subscription bonus. Non - Operating Assets Those not directly related to the company’s operations (may or may not generate revenue) and that can be disposed of without detriment to its business. O Operating Assets Assets that are basic to the company’s operations. Operating Lease That which does not substantially transfer all the risks and benefits incidental to the ownership of the asset. Leases that are not operating leases are classified as financial leases. P Parent Company An entity that has one or more subsidiaries. Percentual Value Value at the end of the projective period to be added on the cash flow. Point of Sale Intangible asset that adds value to commercial property, due to its location and expected commercial exploitation. Population Total market data of the segment to be analyzed. Premium for Expected Future Profitability (goodwill) Future economic benefits arising from assets not capable of being individually identified or separately recognized. Present Value The estimated present value of discounted net cash flows in the normal course of business. Price The amount by which a transaction is performed involving a property, a product or the right thereto. Private Area Useful area plus building blocks (such as walls, pillars, etc.) and elevator hallway (in specific cases). Property Something of value, subject to use, or that may be the object of a right, which integrates an equity. Q Qualitative Variables Variables that cannot be measured or counted, only ordered or ranked, according to attributes inherent to the property (e.g., building standard, conservation status and quality of the soil). Quantitative Variables Variables that can be measured or counted (e.g., private area, number of bedrooms and parking spaces). R Range for Real Estate Valuations Range in the vicinity of the point estimator adopted in the valuation within which to arbitrate the value of the property, provided it is justified by the existence of features that are not contemplated in the model . 4 Re (Cost of Equity) Return required by shareholders for the capital invested. Real Estate Property, consisting of land and any improvements incorporated thereto. Can be classified as urban or rural, depending on its location, use or to its highest and best use. Recoverable Value The highest fair value of an asset (or cashgenerating unit) minus the cost of sales compared with its value in use. Reference Real Estate Market data with features comparable to the property assessed. Regression Model The model used to represent a specific phenomenon, based on a sample, considering the various influencing characteristics. Remaining Life A property’s remaining life. Replacement Cost A property’s reproduction cost less depreciation, with the same function and features comparable to the property assessed. Replacement Value for New Value based on what the property would cost (usually in relation to current market prices) to be replaced with or substituted by a new, equal or similar property . Marketing Factor The ratio between the market value of an asset and its reproduction cost less depreciation or replacement cost, which may be higher or lower than 1 (one). Rd (Cost of Debt) A measure of the amount paid for the capital earned from third parties, in the form of loans, financing, market funding, among others.

S Sample Set of market data representative of a population. Scrap Value Market value of a property’s reusable materials in disabling conditions, without their being used for production purposes. Shareholders’ Equity at Market Prices See Assets Approach. Statistical Inference Part of statistical science that allows drawing conclusions about the population from a sample. Subsidiary Entity, including that with no legal character, such as an association, controlled by another entity (known as the parent company) . Supporting Documentation Documentation raised and provided by the client on which the report premises are based. Survey Evidence of local events through insightful observations in a property and of the factors and conditions that constitute or influence it. T Tangible Asset Physically existing asset, such as land, building, machinery, equipment, furniture and tools. Technical Report Detailed report or technical clarification issued by a legally qualified and trained professional on a specific subject. Technical Term of Responsibility Required document, which defines the responsible engineer for a product or service. Total Construction Area Resulting from the sum of the real private area and the common area allocated to an independent unit, defined according to ABNT. U Urbanizable Land Land eligible to receive urban infrastructure works aiming at its efficient use, by means of the subdivision, split or implementation of a business . Useful Area Real private area subtracted from the area occupied by walls and other building blocks that prevent or hinder its use. Useful Economic Life The period in which an asset is expected to be available for use, or the number of production or similar units expected to be obtained from the asset by the entity. V Valuation Act or process of determining the value of an asset. Valuation Date Specific date (day, month and year) of application of the assessment value. Valuation Methodology One or more approaches used in developing evaluative calculations for the indication of the value of an asset. Representative value of the share of the property one wishes to insure and that may correspond to the maximum insurable value. Value at Risk Value in Use Value of a property in operating conditions in its present state, such as the useful part of an industry, including, where relevant, the costs of design, packaging, taxes, freight and installation. Value of a business in forced liquidation Value of a property offered for sale on the market outside the normal process, i.e. one that would be established if the property were offered for sale separately, taking into account the costs involved and the discount required for a sale in a reduced period. Value of a business in immediate liquidation The compulsory liquidation refers to a business forced into liquidation by way of a winding - up petition presented to the court. More aggressive than forced liquidation. Value Plan The graphic representation or listing of generic square meter values of land or of the real estate on the same date. W WACC WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital) Model in which capital cost is determined by the weighted average of the market value of capital structure components (own and others). WARA Weighted Average Return on Assets (WARA) Weighted average rate of return expected for the assets and liabilities that make up the company under analysis, including goodwill. 5 Residual Value of an Asset Estimated value that the entity would obtain at present with the sale of the asset, after deducting the estimated costs thereof, if the asset were already at the expected age and condition at the end of its useful life. Residual Value Value of new or used asset projected for a date limited to that in which it becomes scrap, considering its being in operation during the period. Reproduction Cost Expense required for the exact duplication of a property, regardless of any depreciation. Reproduction Cost Less Depreciation A property’s reproduction cost less depreciation, considering the state it is in.

Rio de Janeiro +55 21 2212 - 6850 apsis.rj@apsis.com.br São Paulo 55 11 4550 - 2701 apsis.sp@apsis.com.br Minas Gerais +55 31 98299 - 6678 apsis.mg@apsis.com.br apsis.com.br 1

ANNEX II TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' PROPOSAL

Recommendation Report of the Independent Special Committee

(This attachment begins on the next page.)

(Remainder of page intentionally left blank.)

São Paulo, May 15, 2025.

To

BRF S.A.

Avenida das Nações Unidas, nº 14.401, 22nd floor, Chácara Santo Antônio

São Paulo – SP

Attention: Members of the Board of Directors

Ref.: Report with the Recommendation of the Independent Special Committee regarding the proposal for the acquisition of BRF S.A. Shares by Marfrig Global Foods S.A.

Dear Sirs,

The Independent Special Committee of BRF S.A. (“BRF” or “Company”), established by a resolution of the Board of Directors approved at a meeting held on April 25, 2025 (“BDM of 04.25.2025”), in accordance with CVM Guidance Opinion No. 35/2008 (“CVM Opinion 35”), to analyze and negotiate the terms and conditions of the business combination between the Company and Marfrig Global Foods S.A. (“MGF”) (the “Transaction” or “Reorganization”), as per the correspondence sent by MGF to BRF on April 24, 2025 (the “Independent Committee” or “Committee”), hereby submits this report to present its conclusions and recommendations (the “Report”).

1 – Description of the Proposed Transaction

MGF and BRF are publicly traded companies with shares listed on the segment known as “Novo Mercado” of B3 S.A. – Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão (“Novo Mercado”), and as of this date, MGF holds common shares of BRF representing approximately 53.09% of the Company’s voting capital.

The Transaction involves a business combination between BRF and MGF (collectively, the “Companies”), through the acquisition by MGF of all BRF shares not held by MGF, in exchange for the issuance to BRF shareholders (excluding MGF) of common shares of MGF, resulting in the transfer of BRF’s shareholder base to MGF and the conversion of BRF into a wholly-owned subsidiary of MGF, in accordance with Article 252 of Law No. 6,404/1976 (“Brazilian Corporations Law”).

2 – Procedures and Work of the Independent Committee

2.1 – Formation and Composition of the Independent Committee

Given that the Transaction involves a merger between a controlling company and a controlled company, as defined in Article 264 of the Brazilian Corporations Law, the Board of Directors of BRF, at the BDM of 04.25.2025, established the Committee to analyze and negotiate the terms and conditions of the Transaction, including, but not limited to, the exchange ratio between BRF and MGF shares, and to submit its recommendations to the Board of Directors, in compliance with CVM Opinion 35.

At the BDM of 04.25.2025, the following members were unanimously appointed by the Board of Directors of BRF to form the Committee: Mr. Augusto Marques da Cruz Filho, Ms. Flávia Maria Bittencourt, and Mr. Eduardo Augusto Rocha Pocetti, with Mr. Augusto Marques da Cruz Filho also designated to coordinate the Committee’s work.

The members appointed to the Committee are independent members of the Board of Directors, in accordance with the independence criteria set forth in the Novo Mercado Regulations and the regulations issued by the CVM, and have no personal interest in the Transaction.

The members of the Independent Committee believe that the governance procedures adopted during their work were adequate and sufficient to (i) ensure the independence of the Committee’s analysis, negotiations, and recommendations regarding the Transaction; and (ii) protect the interests of BRF and its minority shareholders.

2.2 – Advisors to the Committee

At the BDM of 04.25.2025, the members of the Board of Directors of BRF authorized the Company’s management to assist the members of the Independent Committee in their duties, including the hiring of external advisors to be nominated by the Committee, considering the provisions of CVM Opinion 35, market practices commonly accepted for transactions of similar size, and the values involved in the Transaction.

At a meeting held on April 28, 2025, the Committee approved the retainment of Citigroup Global Markets Brasil Corretora de Câmbio, Títulos e Valores Mobiliários S.A. to act as the financial advisor to the Committee in the Transaction (“Citigroup” or “Financial Advisor”).

The services provided by the Financial Advisor included: (i) issuing a fairness opinion on the financial equity of the proposed exchange ratio for the Transaction; and (ii) providing financial advisory and investment banking services in the structuring and negotiation strategies of the Transaction with MGF representatives.

At the meeting held on April 28, 2025, the Committee also approved the retainment of the law firm Eizirik Advogados to act as the legal advisor to the Committee (“Legal Advisor”).

Furthermore, given the existence of American Depositary Receipts – ADRs, backed by BRF common shares, traded on the U.S. stock market, the Committee, at a meeting held on April 30, 2025, additionally approved the retainment of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP (“Simpson Thacher” and, together with the Legal Advisor and the Financial Advisor, “Advisors”), as the legal advisor to the Committee on matters related to U.S. law, including advising BRF on disclosures and any necessary filings of the Transaction with the Securities and Exchange Commission – SEC.

The Financial Advisor, in turn, retained its own legal advisors, who also analyzed legal aspects of the Transaction from the perspective of the Financial Advisor's performance, namely: (i) the law firm Cescon Barrieu for issues related to Brazilian law; and (ii) the law firm Davis Polk for matters related to U.S. law.

2.3 – Summary of the Committee’s Work

From the formation of the Committee on April 25, 2025, to May 15, 2025, the Independent Committee held 10 (ten) meetings with its various Advisors, depending on the matters under analysis and discussion at each meeting. Additionally, 3 (three) joint meetings were held with the independent committee established by the Board of Directors of MGF (“MGF Committee”), to (i) discuss the rationale for the Transaction; (ii) present MGF’s business, including a detailed overview of its operations in South America and the U.S. through National Beef; (iii) discuss commercial, operational, and financial information related to the Companies; and (iv) negotiate the exchange ratio and other terms and conditions of the Transaction.

In parallel, the Advisors, with the Committee’s authorization, maintained interactions with representatives of the Companies’ management and with advisors hired by MGF, to analyze and review financial and legal aspects related to the Transaction, in accordance with the scope of each Advisor’s responsibilities.

The discussions held in the Committee meetings, as well as in the joint meetings with the MGF Committee, were duly recorded in minutes, which are available to the members of the Company’s Board of Directors and will be disclosed by BRF in accordance with CVM Resolution No. 81/2022.

3 – Negotiated Exchange Ratio and Fairness Opinion Prepared by the Financial Advisor

Following negotiations between the Independent Committees of BRF and MGF, the Committees agreed, in a joint meeting held on May 8, 2025, that the following exchange ratio for the Reorganization will apply: (i) shareholders of BRF (except MGF) will receive 0.8521 common shares issued by MGF for each 1 (one) common share issued by BRF held on the closing date of the Transaction (“Exchange Ratio”); and (ii) this Exchange Ratio took into account the distribution of dividends and/or interest on own capital in the gross amount of R$3,520,000,000.00 by BRF and R$2,500,000,000.00 by MGF, in both cases to be resolved up to and including the closing date of the Transaction (“Permitted Distributions”). The Exchange Ratio will be adjusted exclusively (i) in the event of a stock split, reverse split or share bonuses issued by any of the Companies; and/or (ii) in accordance with the methodology contained in the Annex I to this Report. In accordance with the aforementioned methodology, any disbursement incurred by the Companies with the exercise of the right of withdrawal will reduce the Permitted Distributions by an equivalent amount, applied proportionally to the two Companies.

On May 15, 2025, Citigroup presented to the Committee the final version of its fairness opinion on the proposed conditions for the Reorganization (“Fairness Opinion”), which is incorporated into this Report as Annex II, indicating that the negotiated conditions for the Transaction by the Committee, including the Exchange Ratio with the payment of dividends and/or interest on own capital in the above-mentioned amounts, are fair from a financial perspective.

For the issuance of the Fairness Opinion, Citigroup has analyzed: (i) publicly available financial and operational information relating to the Companies, as well as financial projections and other information and data provided or discussed with the respective management of the Companies, including estimates related to the potential strategic implications and operational benefits expected by the management of BRF and MGF as a result of the Transaction; (ii) the financial conditions of the Transaction in light of, among other factors, (ii.1) current and historical market prices and trading volumes of common shares issued by BRF and MGF; (ii.2) the historical and projected results and other operating indicators of the Companies; and (ii.3) the capital structure and the economic and financial situation of both Companies; (iii) the financial conditions of other public transactions deemed relevant as comparative parameters for the evaluation of the Transaction; (iv) certain publicly available financial information relating to other companies whose operations were considered comparable or relevant for the analysis of BRF and MGF's business; and (v) certain financial effects pro forma of the Reorganization on FGM.

In a meeting held on May 15, 2025, the Committee, in the exercise of its duties, reviewed the Fairness Opinion and considered the financial analyses adequate to evaluate the fairness of the Exchange Ratio and the payment of dividends and/or interest on own capital from a financial perspective.

4 – Analysis of Certain Drafts of the Transaction Documents

The Legal Advisor, in the exercise of its duties, worked together with the management of the Companies and the advisors of MGF in the discussion and drafting of the Draft Plan of Merger for the Merger (“Plan of Merger”) and other legal documents related to the Transaction.

The Committee had the opportunity to review and discuss with the Legal Advisor the draft of the Plan of Merger, as well as other documents to be disclosed to the market regarding the Transaction, and concluded that the terms and conditions of the aforementioned documents are appropriate.

5 – Assumptions Adopted for the Committee’s Operations

For the purposes of negotiating and defining the Exchange Ratio, as well as the other terms and conditions of the Transaction, and also for the preparation of this Report, the Committee assumed that all documents and information provided by the management of the Companies are correct and true and that the company resulting from the Transaction will maintain high standards of corporate governance in line with those currently adopted by BRF and MGF, in line with the best market practices.

Throughout its work, the Independent Committee considered, among other relevant elements and information, the Fairness Opinion and other analyses conducted jointly with its Financial Advisor, as well as the draft of the Plan of Merger and analyses performed by the Legal Advisor and Simpson Thacher.

The Committee also adopted as assumptions for its operations that: (i) the work performed by the Advisors was free from any conflict of interest regarding the Transaction or the Companies; and (ii) there are no contracts, instruments, commitments, liabilities, material events, or any other information that has not been properly disclosed to the Committee and that could alter, compromise, or invalidate the conclusions, opinions, or positions issued in its deliberations.

It was not within the scope of the Committee’s work to carry out audits, independent investigations or analyses related to the obligations or contingencies of the Companies. Although no independent verification of the information provided by the Companies to the Committee has been carried out, there is no data or characteristics in the documents or information that would make the members of the Committee question its veracity or consistency.

Likewise, it was not incumbent on the Committee to evaluate or issue an opinion as to the validity, effectiveness or legal feasibility of the Transaction.

6 – Conclusion and Recommendation of the Committee

In light of the work described above and considering the contents of the Fairness Opinion and the draft of the Plan of Merger, the Committee, unanimously, recommends to the Board of Directors of BRF its favorable recommendation for the implementation of the Reorganization, subject to the following conditions, which were the subject of negotiation by the Independent Committee with the MGF Committee:

The Committee believes that, if the above-referenced bases are adopted, the Transaction will be conducted on fair terms, adequately preserving the interests of BRF’s minority shareholders.

Respectfully,

Committee Members:

Annex I to the Recommendation Report of the Independent Special Committee

Exchange Ratio Adjustment Methodology

Formula

R = B2 ÷ M2, where:

Examples

Example 1

Example 2

Example 3

Annex 2 to the Recommendation Report of the Independent Special Committee

Fairness Opinion Prepared by Citigroup Global Markets

Confidential

May 15, 2025

Independent Committee

BRF S.A.

Rua Jorge Tzachel, 475, Bairro Fazenda

Itajaí - SC, 88301-600, Brazil

Independent Committee:

You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of the common stock of BRF S.A. (“BRF”) (other than Marfrig Global Foods S.A. (“Marfrig”) and its affiliates) of the Exchange Ratio (defined below) provided for pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the “Protocolo e Justificação de Incorporação das Ações de Emissão da BRF S.A. pela Marfrig Global Foods S.A.”, proposed to be entered into among BRF and Marfrig (the “Merger Agreement”).

As more fully described in the Merger Agreement, (i) Marfrig will acquire the outstanding common shares of BRF not already owned by Marfrig in a statutory share-for-share merger governed by Brazilian law (the “Merger”), and (ii) each outstanding share of common stock, without par value, of BRF (“BRF Common Stock”) (other than shares held by Marfrig and shares held in treasury by BRF) will be converted into the right to receive 0.8521 shares of common stock, without par value, of Marfrig (“Marfrig Common Stock”) (the “Exchange Ratio”). We understand that, in connection with the Merger and as contemplated by the parties, BRF and Marfrig each intend to declare and pay special dividends to their respective shareholders in aggregate amounts of R$3.52 billion and R$2.5 billion, respectively (the “Special Dividends”), prior to the effective time of the Merger. We further understand that the Exchange Ratio of 0.8521 already reflects the anticipated payment of the Special Dividends, and that if the actual dividend amounts paid differ from these amounts, the Exchange Ratio will be adjusted pursuant to a formula to be set forth in the Merger Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, our opinion is based on, and relates solely to, the Exchange Ratio as currently contemplated, which gives effect to the Special Dividends as described above.

We understand that the Independent Committee was created by BRF’s Board of Directors pursuant to and in accordance with the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (“CVM”) Guidance Opinion No. 35 of September 1, 2008, for the sole purpose of negotiating the Merger on behalf of BRF.

In arriving at our opinion, we reviewed a draft dated May 14, 2025 of the Merger Agreement and held discussions with the Independent Committee and certain senior officers, directors and other representatives and advisors of BRF and certain senior officers and other representatives and advisors of Marfrig concerning the businesses, operations and prospects of BRF and Marfrig. We examined certain publicly available business and financial information relating to BRF and Marfrig as well as certain financial forecasts and other information and data relating to BRF and Marfrig which were provided to or discussed with us by the respective managements of BRF and Marfrig, including information relating to the potential strategic implications and operational benefits (including the amount, timing and achievability thereof) anticipated by the managements of BRF and Marfrig to result from the Merger and reflected in adjustments to the forecasts and other information and data relating to BRF and Marfrig that were prepared at the direction of, and adopted by, the Independent Committee and presented to us by the Independent Committee, which instructed us to use such information for purposes of our analysis. For the avoidance of doubt, our reliance on such forecasts, including adjustments to management cases and any projections relating to strategic implications or synergies, is based solely on the direction and adoption of such materials by the Independent Committee. We reviewed the financial terms of the Merger as set forth in the Merger Agreement in relation to, among other things: current and historical market prices and trading volumes of BRF Common Stock and Marfrig Common Stock; the historical and projected earnings and other operating data of BRF and Marfrig; and the capitalization and financial condition of BRF and Marfrig. We considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial terms of certain other transactions which we considered relevant in evaluating the Merger and analyzed certain financial, stock market and other publicly available information relating to the businesses of other companies whose operations we considered relevant in evaluating those of BRF and Marfrig. We also evaluated certain potential pro forma financial effects of the Merger on Marfrig. In addition to the foregoing, we conducted such other analyses and examinations and considered such other information and financial, economic and market criteria as we deemed appropriate in arriving at our opinion. The issuance of our opinion has been authorized by our fairness opinion committee.

In rendering our opinion, we have assumed and relied, without independent verification, upon the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other information and data publicly available or provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with us and upon the assurances of the managements of BRF and Marfrig and the Independent Committee that they are not aware of any relevant information that has been omitted or that remains undisclosed to us. With respect to financial forecasts and other information and data relating to BRF and Marfrig provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with us, we have been advised by the respective managements of BRF and Marfrig and by the Independent Committee that such forecasts and other information and data were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the Independent Committee and the managements of BRF and Marfrig as to the future financial performance of BRF and Marfrig, the potential strategic implications and operational benefits anticipated to result from the Merger and the other matters covered thereby, and have assumed, with your consent, that the financial results (including the potential strategic implications and operational benefits anticipated to result from the Merger) reflected in such forecasts and other information and data will be realized in the amounts and at the times projected. We have relied, at your direction, upon the assessments of the managements of BRF and Marfrig and the Independent Committee as to, among other things, the potential impact on BRF and Marfrig of macroeconomic, geopolitical, market, competitive and other conditions, trends and developments in and prospects for, and governmental, regulatory and legislative matters relating to or otherwise affecting, the protein, agriculture, logistics and export industries and the geographic regions in which BRF and Marfrig operate, including with respect to prevailing and future interest rates and exchange rates, inflation, trade and tariff policy, commodity pricing and capital requirements, which are subject to volatility, fluctuations or other implications and which, if different than as assumed, could have a material impact on our analyses or opinion.

We have assumed, with your consent, that the Merger will be consummated in accordance with its terms, without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or agreement and that, in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory or third party approvals, consents and releases for the Merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition will be imposed that would have an adverse effect on BRF, Marfrig or the contemplated benefits of the Merger. Representatives of BRF have advised us, and we further have assumed, that the final terms of the Merger Agreement will not vary materially from those set forth in the draft reviewed by us. We also have assumed, with your consent, that the Merger will be treated as a tax-free reorganization for federal income tax purposes. We are not expressing any opinion or view with respect to accounting, tax, regulatory, legal or similar matters including, without limitation, as to tax or other consequences of the Merger or otherwise or changes in, or the impact of, applicable accounting standards, tax and other laws and regulations and governmental and legislative policies affecting BRF or Marfrig and we have relied, with your consent, upon the assessments of representatives of BRF as to such matters. Our opinion, as set forth herein, relates to the relative values of BRF and Marfrig. We are not expressing any opinion as to what the value of the Marfrig Common Stock or the BRF Common Stock actually will be when issued pursuant to the Merger or the price at which the Marfrig Common Stock or the BRF Common Stock will trade at any time. We have not made or been provided with an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of BRF or Marfrig nor have we made any physical inspection of the properties or assets of BRF or Marfrig. We express no opinion as to the fairness of any statutory withdrawal rights available to shareholders of BRF or Marfrig in connection with the Merger, including the amount per share payable to dissenting shareholders pursuant to Brazilian corporate law, or the financial impact such rights may have on the value, financial position or capital structure of BRF, Marfrig or the combined company following the Merger. We were not requested to, and we did not, solicit third party indications of interest in the possible acquisition of all or a part of BRF, nor were we requested to consider, and our opinion does not address, the underlying business decision of BRF to effect the Merger, the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any alternative business strategies that might exist for BRF or the effect of any other transaction in which BRF might engage. We also express no view as to, and our opinion does not address, the fairness (financial or otherwise) of the amount or nature or any other aspect of any compensation to any officers, directors or employees of any parties to the Merger, or any class of such persons, relative to the Exchange Ratio. Our opinion is necessarily based upon information available to us, and financial, stock market and other conditions and circumstances existing, as of the date hereof.

Our opinion is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, an expert opinion, projection or forecast report, or accounting, appraisal or evaluation report (laudo de avaliação) under the terms of, and has not been prepared for the purpose of, complying with any laws or regulations of Brazil or any jurisdiction outside Brazil, including, without limitation, (i) any regulations, recommendations or guidance opinions of the CVM or the Brazilian Central Bank, (ii) any provisions of the Brazilian Corporations Law (Federal Law No. 6.404, as amended), or (iii) any other self-regulatory rule applicable to Brazilian listed companies.

Citigroup Global Markets Brazil, Corretora de Câmbio, Titulos e Valores Mobiliários S.A. (“Citi”) has acted as financial advisor to the Independent Committee of BRF with respect to this opinion and will receive a fee for our services in connection with the delivery of this opinion. We and our affiliates in the past have provided, currently provide, and may in the future provide services to BRF, Marfrig and/or certain of their respective affiliates unrelated to the proposed Merger, for which services we and such affiliates have received and expect to receive compensation, including, without limitation, acting as joint bookrunner on equity and debt capital markets transactions for BRF, acting as lender and counterparty to Marfrig and its affiliates in connection with structured trade finance, working capital and derivatives transactions, and providing both BRF and Marfrig with foreign exchange, cash management and treasury solutions. We and our affiliates may provide additional services to BRF, Marfrig and their respective affiliates in the future, for which we and such affiliates expect to receive compensation. In the ordinary course of our business, we and our affiliates may actively trade or hold the securities of BRF and Marfrig for our own account or for the account of our customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities. In addition, we and our affiliates (including Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates) may maintain relationships with BRF, Marfrig and their respective affiliates.

Our advisory services and the opinion expressed herein are provided solely for the information of the Independent Committee of BRF in its capacity as such, in its evaluation of the proposed Merger, and not with a view toward public disclosure under any securities laws or otherwise, and may not be relied upon by any third party or used for any other purpose. Our opinion is not intended to be and does not constitute advice or a recommendation to the Independent Committee, the Board of Directors, any stockholder or any other person as to how it should vote or act on any matters relating to the proposed Merger or otherwise. Our opinion and related material may not be quoted, referred to or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, nor may any public reference to Citi be made, without our prior written consent.

Based upon and subject to the foregoing, our experience as investment bankers, our work as described above and other factors we deemed relevant, we are of the opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Exchange Ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of BRF Common Stock (other than Marfrig and its affiliates).

This opinion is issued in the English language and reliance may only be placed on this opinion as issued in the English language. If any translations of this opinion are delivered, they are provided only for ease of reference, have no legal effect and Citi and its affiliates make no representation as to (and accept no responsibility for) the accuracy or completeness of any such translations.

Very truly yours,

/s/Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.

CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC

ANNEX III TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ PROPOSAL

Fairness Opinion Prepared by Citigroup Global Markets

(This attachment begins on the next page.)

(Remainder of page intentionally left blank.)

Confidential

May 15, 2025

Independent Committee

BRF S.A.

Rua Jorge Tzachel, 475, Bairro Fazenda

Itajaí - SC, 88301-600, Brazil

Independent Committee:

You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of the common stock of BRF S.A. (“BRF”) (other than Marfrig Global Foods S.A. (“Marfrig”) and its affiliates) of the Exchange Ratio (defined below) provided for pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the “Protocolo e Justificação de Incorporação das Ações de Emissão da BRF S.A. pela Marfrig Global Foods S.A.”, proposed to be entered into among BRF and Marfrig (the “Merger Agreement”).

As more fully described in the Merger Agreement, (i) Marfrig will acquire the outstanding common shares of BRF not already owned by Marfrig in a statutory share-for-share merger governed by Brazilian law (the “Merger”), and (ii) each outstanding share of common stock, without par value, of BRF (“BRF Common Stock”) (other than shares held by Marfrig and shares held in treasury by BRF) will be converted into the right to receive 0.8521 shares of common stock, without par value, of Marfrig (“Marfrig Common Stock”) (the “Exchange Ratio”). We understand that, in connection with the Merger and as contemplated by the parties, BRF and Marfrig each intend to declare and pay special dividends to their respective shareholders in aggregate amounts of R$3.52 billion and R$2.5 billion, respectively (the “Special Dividends”), prior to the effective time of the Merger. We further understand that the Exchange Ratio of 0.8521 already reflects the anticipated payment of the Special Dividends, and that if the actual dividend amounts paid differ from these amounts, the Exchange Ratio will be adjusted pursuant to a formula to be set forth in the Merger Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, our opinion is based on, and relates solely to, the Exchange Ratio as currently contemplated, which gives effect to the Special Dividends as described above.

We understand that the Independent Committee was created by BRF’s Board of Directors pursuant to and in accordance with the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (“CVM”) Guidance Opinion No. 35 of September 1, 2008, for the sole purpose of negotiating the Merger on behalf of BRF.

In arriving at our opinion, we reviewed a draft dated May 14, 2025 of the Merger Agreement and held discussions with the Independent Committee and certain senior officers, directors and other representatives and advisors of BRF and certain senior officers and other representatives and advisors of Marfrig concerning the businesses, operations and prospects of BRF and Marfrig. We examined certain publicly available business and financial information relating to BRF and Marfrig as well as certain financial forecasts and other information and data relating to BRF and Marfrig which were provided to or discussed with us by the respective managements of BRF and Marfrig, including information relating to the potential strategic implications and operational benefits (including the amount, timing and achievability thereof) anticipated by the managements of BRF and Marfrig to result from the Merger and reflected in adjustments to the forecasts and other information and data relating to BRF and Marfrig that were prepared at the direction of, and adopted by, the Independent Committee and presented to us by the Independent Committee, which instructed us to use such information for purposes of our analysis. For the avoidance of doubt, our reliance on such forecasts, including adjustments to management cases and any projections relating to strategic implications or synergies, is based solely on the direction and adoption of such materials by the Independent Committee. We reviewed the financial terms of the Merger as set forth in the Merger Agreement in relation to, among other things: current and historical market prices and trading volumes of BRF Common Stock and Marfrig Common Stock; the historical and projected earnings and other operating data of BRF and Marfrig; and the capitalization and financial condition of BRF and Marfrig. We considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial terms of certain other transactions which we considered relevant in evaluating the Merger and analyzed certain financial, stock market and other publicly available information relating to the businesses of other companies whose operations we considered relevant in evaluating those of BRF and Marfrig. We also evaluated certain potential pro forma financial effects of the Merger on Marfrig. In addition to the foregoing, we conducted such other analyses and examinations and considered such other information and financial, economic and market criteria as we deemed appropriate in arriving at our opinion. The issuance of our opinion has been authorized by our fairness opinion committee.

In rendering our opinion, we have assumed and relied, without independent verification, upon the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other information and data publicly available or provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with us and upon the assurances of the managements of BRF and Marfrig and the Independent Committee that they are not aware of any relevant information that has been omitted or that remains undisclosed to us. With respect to financial forecasts and other information and data relating to BRF and Marfrig provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with us, we have been advised by the respective managements of BRF and Marfrig and by the Independent Committee that such forecasts and other information and data were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the Independent Committee and the managements of BRF and Marfrig as to the future financial performance of BRF and Marfrig, the potential strategic implications and operational benefits anticipated to result from the Merger and the other matters covered thereby, and have assumed, with your consent, that the financial results (including the potential strategic implications and operational benefits anticipated to result from the Merger) reflected in such forecasts and other information and data will be realized in the amounts and at the times projected. We have relied, at your direction, upon the assessments of the managements of BRF and Marfrig and the Independent Committee as to, among other things, the potential impact on BRF and Marfrig of macroeconomic, geopolitical, market, competitive and other conditions, trends and developments in and prospects for, and governmental, regulatory and legislative matters relating to or otherwise affecting, the protein, agriculture, logistics and export industries and the geographic regions in which BRF and Marfrig operate, including with respect to prevailing and future interest rates and exchange rates, inflation, trade and tariff policy, commodity pricing and capital requirements, which are subject to volatility, fluctuations or other implications and which, if different than as assumed, could have a material impact on our analyses or opinion.

We have assumed, with your consent, that the Merger will be consummated in accordance with its terms, without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or agreement and that, in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory or third party approvals, consents and releases for the Merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition will be imposed that would have an adverse effect on BRF, Marfrig or the contemplated benefits of the Merger. Representatives of BRF have advised us, and we further have assumed, that the final terms of the Merger Agreement will not vary materially from those set forth in the draft reviewed by us. We also have assumed, with your consent, that the Merger will be treated as a tax-free reorganization for federal income tax purposes. We are not expressing any opinion or view with respect to accounting, tax, regulatory, legal or similar matters including, without limitation, as to tax or other consequences of the Merger or otherwise or changes in, or the impact of, applicable accounting standards, tax and other laws and regulations and governmental and legislative policies affecting BRF or Marfrig and we have relied, with your consent, upon the assessments of representatives of BRF as to such matters. Our opinion, as set forth herein, relates to the relative values of BRF and Marfrig. We are not expressing any opinion as to what the value of the Marfrig Common Stock or the BRF Common Stock actually will be when issued pursuant to the Merger or the price at which the Marfrig Common Stock or the BRF Common Stock will trade at any time. We have not made or been provided with an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of BRF or Marfrig nor have we made any physical inspection of the properties or assets of BRF or Marfrig. We express no opinion as to the fairness of any statutory withdrawal rights available to shareholders of BRF or Marfrig in connection with the Merger, including the amount per share payable to dissenting shareholders pursuant to Brazilian corporate law, or the financial impact such rights may have on the value, financial position or capital structure of BRF, Marfrig or the combined company following the Merger. We were not requested to, and we did not, solicit third party indications of interest in the possible acquisition of all or a part of BRF, nor were we requested to consider, and our opinion does not address, the underlying business decision of BRF to effect the Merger, the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any alternative business strategies that might exist for BRF or the effect of any other transaction in which BRF might engage. We also express no view as to, and our opinion does not address, the fairness (financial or otherwise) of the amount or nature or any other aspect of any compensation to any officers, directors or employees of any parties to the Merger, or any class of such persons, relative to the Exchange Ratio. Our opinion is necessarily based upon information available to us, and financial, stock market and other conditions and circumstances existing, as of the date hereof.

Our opinion is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, an expert opinion, projection or forecast report, or accounting, appraisal or evaluation report (laudo de avaliação) under the terms of, and has not been prepared for the purpose of, complying with any laws or regulations of Brazil or any jurisdiction outside Brazil, including, without limitation, (i) any regulations, recommendations or guidance opinions of the CVM or the Brazilian Central Bank, (ii) any provisions of the Brazilian Corporations Law (Federal Law No. 6.404, as amended), or (iii) any other self-regulatory rule applicable to Brazilian listed companies.

Citigroup Global Markets Brazil, Corretora de Câmbio, Titulos e Valores Mobiliários S.A. (“Citi”) has acted as financial advisor to the Independent Committee of BRF with respect to this opinion and will receive a fee for our services in connection with the delivery of this opinion. We and our affiliates in the past have provided, currently provide, and may in the future provide services to BRF, Marfrig and/or certain of their respective affiliates unrelated to the proposed Merger, for which services we and such affiliates have received and expect to receive compensation, including, without limitation, acting as joint bookrunner on equity and debt capital markets transactions for BRF, acting as lender and counterparty to Marfrig and its affiliates in connection with structured trade finance, working capital and derivatives transactions, and providing both BRF and Marfrig with foreign exchange, cash management and treasury solutions. We and our affiliates may provide additional services to BRF, Marfrig and their respective affiliates in the future, for which we and such affiliates expect to receive compensation. In the ordinary course of our business, we and our affiliates may actively trade or hold the securities of BRF and Marfrig for our own account or for the account of our customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities. In addition, we and our affiliates (including Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates) may maintain relationships with BRF, Marfrig and their respective affiliates.

Our advisory services and the opinion expressed herein are provided solely for the information of the Independent Committee of BRF in its capacity as such, in its evaluation of the proposed Merger, and not with a view toward public disclosure under any securities laws or otherwise, and may not be relied upon by any third party or used for any other purpose. Our opinion is not intended to be and does not constitute advice or a recommendation to the Independent Committee, the Board of Directors, any stockholder or any other person as to how it should vote or act on any matters relating to the proposed Merger or otherwise. Our opinion and related material may not be quoted, referred to or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, nor may any public reference to Citi be made, without our prior written consent.

Based upon and subject to the foregoing, our experience as investment bankers, our work as described above and other factors we deemed relevant, we are of the opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Exchange Ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of BRF Common Stock (other than Marfrig and its affiliates).

This opinion is issued in the English language and reliance may only be placed on this opinion as issued in the English language. If any translations of this opinion are delivered, they are provided only for ease of reference, have no legal effect and Citi and its affiliates make no representation as to (and accept no responsibility for) the accuracy or completeness of any such translations.

Very truly yours,

/s/Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.

CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC

ANNEX IV TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ PROPOSAL

Minutes of the Meetings of the Board of Directors, Independent Special Committee, Audit and Integrity Committee and Fiscal Council of BRF that deliberated on the Merger

(This attachment begins on the next page.)

(Remainder of page intentionally left blank.)

BRF S.A.

Publicly-Held Company with Authorized Capital

CNPJ 01.838.723/0001-27

NIRE 42.300.034.240

CVM 1629-2

MINUTES OF THE EXTRAORDINARY MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HELD ON APRIL 25, 2025

1. DATE, TIME AND PLACE: Held on April 25, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., at the office of BRF S.A. (“BRF” or “Company”), located at Avenida das Nações Unidas, nº 14.401, 25th floor, Chácara Santo Antônio, CEP 04794-000, City of São Paulo, State of São Paulo, and via videoconference.

2. CONVENING AND ATTENDANCE: Summons waived due to the presence of all the members of the Board of Directors, namely, Mr. Marcos Antonio Molina dos Santos, Ms. Marcia Aparecida Pascoal Marçal dos Santos, Mr. Sergio Agapito Lires Rial, Mr. Marcos Fernando Marçal dos Santos, Ms. Flávia Maria Bittencourt, Mr. Augusto Marques da Cruz Filho, Mr. Eduardo Augusto Rocha Pocetti, Mr. Pedro de Camargo Neto and Mr. Márcio Hamilton Ferreira.

3. CHAIR AND SECRETARY: Chair: Mr. Marcos Antonio Molina dos Santos. Secretary: Mr. Heraldo Geres.

4. AGENDA: 1. To acknowledge the letter sent to the Company by Marfrig Global Foods S.A. (“MGF”) on 04.24.2025 (“Letter”), in which it expresses its intention to explore a potential business combination between MGF and BRF (“Potential Transaction”); 2. To resolve on: (i) the creation of an Independent Special Committee (“Independent Committee”), in compliance with the provisions of CVM Guidance Opinion No. 35/2008 (“CVM Opinion 35”), for the purpose of analyzing and negotiating the terms and conditions of the Potential Transaction, including, but not limited to, the exchange ratio between the shares issued by BRF and MGF and to submit its recommendations to the Board of Directors; (ii) the appointment of the members of the Independent Committee; and (iii) the authorization for the Company’s management to assist the Independent Committee in its mission and proceed with the hiring of external advisors for the Independent Committee.

5. RESOLUTIONS: After reading, analyzing and discussing the matters included in the agenda, the members of the Board of Directors:

5.1. They stated that they were aware of the Letter sent to the Company by MGF on 04.24.2025, in which the latter expresses its intention to explore the Potential Transaction, which would result in the unification of the shareholder bases of BRF and MGF and whose implementation, in principle, would occur through the merger of the Company’s shares by MGF;

5.2. Approved, unanimously and without any reservation:

(i) The drafting of these minutes in the form of a summary.

(ii) The creation of the ad hoc Independent Committee, composed of three (3) members, all of whom shall be independent members of the Board of Directors. The Independent Committee will analyze and negotiate the terms and conditions of the Potential Transaction, including, but not limited to, the exchange ratio between the shares issued by BRF and MGF and submit its recommendations to the Board of Directors, in compliance with CVM Opinion 35, with the objective of contributing to the protection of the Company’s interests and ensuring that the transaction observes fair conditions for its shareholders. The Independent Committee may engage legal and financial advisors to assist it in the performance of its duties. The decisions of the Independent Committee shall be approved by a majority of its members. The Independent Committee shall have no executive or decision-making functions, and its opinions, proposals or recommendations shall be submitted to the Company’s Board of Directors.

(iii) The appointment of the following members of the Independent Committee: (a) Ms. Flávia Maria Bittencourt, Brazilian, in a stable union, chemical engineer, bearer of Identity Card RG No. 09.846.794-7 DETRAN/RJ, registered with the CPF/MF under No. 011.971.887-11, with business address at Avenida das Nações Unidas, No. 14.401, Torre Jequitibá, 25th Floor, São Paulo – SP, CEP 04794-000; (b) Mr. Augusto Marques da Cruz Filho, Brazilian, married, economist, bearer of Identity Card No. 5.761.837-9 SSP/SP, registered with the CPF/MF under No. 688.369.968-68, with business address at Avenida das Nações Unidas, No. 14.401, Torre Jequitibá, 25th Floor, São Paulo – SP, CEP 04794-000; and (c) Mr. Eduardo Augusto Rocha Pocetti, Brazilian, married, accountant, bearer of Identity Card RG No. 5.610.378-5 SSP/SP, registered with the CPF/MF under No. 837.465.368-04, with business address at Avenida das Nações Unidas, No. 14.401, Torre Jequitibá, 25th Floor, São Paulo – SP, CEP 04794-000. All of them are independent directors of the Company, as stated in the minutes of the Annual and Extraordinary General Meeting held on 03.28.2024. Mr. Augusto Marques da Cruz Filho will be responsible for coordinating the work of the Independent Committee. The members here named, who were present at this meeting, accepted their appointments. The members of the Independent Committee shall, in the performance of their duties, comply with the provisions of Law No. 6,404/1976 regarding the fiduciary duties of managers, always acting in the interest of the Company.

(iv) The authorization for the Company’s management to assist the members of the Independent Committee in their mission, as set forth in these minutes, as well as to hire external advisors to be appointed by the Independent Committee, subject to confidentiality agreements, considering the provisions of CVM Opinion 35 and the market practices usually accepted for transactions of similar size and the amounts involved in the Potential Transaction.

5.3. Stated that the Potential Transaction and the information related thereto are still strictly confidential, which is why they recommended to the members of the Independent Committee and the Company’s management to adopt the necessary measures to avoid the disclosure or leakage of information related to the Potential Transaction, in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations, especially CVM Resolution No. 44/2021.

6. DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE COMPANY: Documents related to the items on the Agenda that support the resolutions taken by the members of the Board of Directors and/or the information provided during the meeting are filed at the Company’s headquarters.

7. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned, and these minutes were drawn up in the form of a summary, by means of electronic processing, which, after being read and approved, was signed by all the Board Members present.

São Paulo, April 25, 2025.

President and Secretary:

Board Members:

*     *      *

BRF S.A.

Publicly-Held Company with Authorized Capital

CNPJ 01.838.723/0001-27

NIRE 42.300.034.240

CVM 1629-2

MINUTES OF THE EXTRAORDINARY MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HELD ON MAY 15, 2025

Also present were the following members of the Fiscal Council of the Company, in the form provided for in Article 163, § 3, of Law No. 6,404/1976 (“Corporation Law”): Messrs. Antônio Mathias Nogueira Moreira, Ricardo Florence dos Santos and Alexandre Eduardo de Melo.