UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025

or

For the transition period from _________ to _______

Commission File Number 001-38371

One Stop Systems, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

2235 Enterprise Street #110

Escondido, California 92029

(Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)

(760) 745-9883

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of June 30, 2025, the last day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $75,252,644, based on the closing price of the registrant’s common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market of $3.55 per share on such date. This calculation does not reflect a determination that persons are affiliates for any other purpose.

As of March 5, 2026, the registrant had 24,737,191 shares of common stock (par value $0.0001) outstanding.

One Stop Systems, Inc.

FORM 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this Annual Report, including statements regarding our future operating results, financial position and cash flows, our business strategy and plans and our objectives for future operations, are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. This Annual Report also contains estimates and other statistical data made by independent parties and by us relating to market size and growth and other data about our industry. This data involves a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our future performance and the future performance of the markets in which we operate are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “target,” “project,” “contemplate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. The forward-looking statements in this Annual Report are only predictions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, operating results, business strategy, short-term and long-term business operations and objectives. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” The events and circumstances reflected in our forward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all risk factors and uncertainties. Except as required by applicable law, we do not plan to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein, whether as a result of any new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise.

One Stop Systems, the One Stop Systems logo, and other trademarks or service marks of One Stop Systems appearing in this Annual Report are the property of One Stop Systems, Inc. This Annual Report also includes trademarks, trade names and service marks that are the property of other organizations. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this Annual Report appear without the ® and ™ symbols, but those references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights, or that the applicable owner will not assert its rights, to these trademarks and trade names.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements and other information required by the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Our SEC filings are available to the public on the SEC’s internet site at http://www.sec.gov.

On our internet website, http://www.onestopsystems.com, we post the following recent filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC: our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. The information in or accessible through the SEC or our website are not incorporated into, and is not considered part of, this Annual Report. Further, our references to the URLs for these websites are intended to be inactive textual references only.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

Company History

One Stop Systems, Inc. (“we,” “our,” “OSS,” or the “Company”) was originally incorporated as a California corporation in 1999, after initially being formed as a California limited liability company in 1998. On December 14, 2017, the Company was reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in connection with its initial public offering. The Company designs, manufactures, and markets specialized rugged high-performance compute ("HPC"), high speed switch fabrics, and storage systems, which are designed to target edge applications for artificial intelligence ("AI") / machine learning ("ML"), sensor processing, sensor fusion, and autonomy. The Company markets its products to manufacturers of equipment and platforms used for autonomous vehicles, medical, industrial, aerospace, and defense applications, with special focus on platforms that move, such as planes, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), trucks, ships, submarines, and mobile datacenters or command posts where sensor processing, sensor fusion, AI, and ML are integrated to support such applications. If an application needs sensor processing, AI, and/or autonomous capabilities, and it moves, OSS aims to deliver the highest performance solutions that are designed to survive these challenging environments.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary in Germany, One Stop Systems, GmbH (“OSS GmbH”). Then, in July 2016, the Company acquired Mission Technologies Group, Inc. (“Magma”) and its operations . Magma designed and manufactured PCIe expansion systems primarily for datacenter and business-to-professional consumer applications, such as the media and entertainment market.

On August 31, 2018, the Company acquired Concept Development Inc. (“CDI”) located in Irvine, California. CDI specialized in the design and manufacture of custom high-performance computing systems for airborne in-flight entertainment, flight safety equipment, and networking systems. CDI’s business was fully integrated into the core operations of the Company as of June 1, 2020.

On October 31, 2018, OSS GmbH acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Bressner Technology GmbH, a limited liability company registered under the laws of Germany and located near Munich, Germany (“Bressner”). Bressner was an integrator and distributor of hardware systems and components.

On December 30, 2025, the Company signed and closed a definitive agreement to sell all Bressner through a sale of all shares of OSS GmbH. The consummation of this transaction represented a strategic shift and prioritization of the Company's core business developing and manufacturing deployable edge computing systems for mission critical applications.

Our principal executive offices are located at 2235 Enterprise Street, Suite 110, Escondido, California 92029, and our telephone number is (760) 745-9883. Our website address is www.onestopsystems.com. Information contained in, or accessible through, our website is for reference purposes only.

Business Overview

OSS designs, manufactures, and markets specialized enterprise class high-performance compute, high speed switch fabrics, and storage hardware and software, which are designed to target edge applications for AI/ML, sensor processing, sensor fusion, and autonomy. Edge computing is a form of computing that is done on platform or on site, connected with the data source or the user, rather than in the cloud, minimizing the need for data to be processed remotely. This growing trend increases computing performance and security, as the data does not have to travel to distant datacenter locations. Edge computing is most recognizable in applications such as sensor processing, sensor fusion, autonomy, and AI/ML. To meet the demands at the edge, we offer specialized products and system solutions that consist of computers, switch fabrics, and storage products that incorporate the latest state-of-the art components with embedded proprietary software. Such products and systems allow us to offer high-end solutions to be integrated into edge platforms in our target markets.

The fast-growing edge computing space consists of three major segments. The first segment is comprised of smaller datacenters located near the user - on the edge. These typically include compute and storage racks in environmentally controlled buildings, similar to large cloud datacenters. Suppliers in this space tend to be the same large server and storage manufacturers whose products are used at cloud datacenters. The second segment includes billions of Internet-of-Things (“IOT”) devices that may reside in everything from home appliances to the factory production floor.

These IOT devices and applications tend not to be challenged on performance and easily communicate up to the cloud or the datacenters on the edge. OSS does not focus on either of the foregoing segments. The third segment is focused on edge platforms generally on the move or located in challenging environmental conditions. These edge platforms are primarily on land, in the air, or at sea on vehicles that need enterprise class datacenter level performance for sensor processing, sensor fusion, autonomy, and AI/ML applications. This is where OSS’ vision and strategy is aligned, and where we believe that we offer the greatest unique value.

Examples of these applications range from industrial autonomous trucks, to mining equipment and smart agricultural equipment, to military land, sea, and airborne weapon system platforms. Less mobile applications that utilize High Performance Compute ("HPC") and edge computing include items such as medical applications, mobile command centers, and certain datacenters.

Sensor fusion, autonomy and AI capabilities require that these demanding applications be connected to a wide array of data sources and sensors, and to have the ability to quickly access and store large and ever-growing data sets. They must be able to maintain ultra-fast processing power to act on data or process sensor inputs in real time at the edge location, which is independent of whether a high-speed network, like 5G or a tactical data link, connects the edge application back to the distant central data or command centers. Standard servers and storage systems available in the market do not address, and typically will not survive, the edge environment requirements. Although the network or data link, if it exists, may transfer data, or be used for updates, the latency is not acceptable for many of these applications where time is of the essence. This increases the need for enterprise class datacenter level performance using the latest generation of products from companies like NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel. In most of these edge applications, available space is limited and the number of inputs from sensors and other data sources are significant thus requiring high speed switch fabrics like the latest in PCI Express, for which OSS is a recognized expert in the market. In all cases, at the edge, there is a demanding operational environment that requires ruggedized solutions to deliver assured and continued operation, which must be balanced with size weight and power (“SWAP”) requirements. Solutions in this space must not only be light and fit into small volumes, but must also survive drops, g-forces, and vibration. Additionally, they must continue to operate at extreme temperatures and in dusty or wet conditions.

Many companies that enter this space tend to offer solutions based on older and lower performance technology, whereas we aim to advance our proprietary state-of-the-art technologies and utilize the latest generation of enterprise class products to help ensure superior performance. We aim to leverage our proven track-record of delivering first-to-market advanced technologies and technical strength, working with the latest high-speed networks like PCI Express, Ethernet, and NVIDIA’s NVLink®. This is in addition to our expertise with rugged servers, compute acceleration, and high-performance flash array storage systems. By combining our knowledge and execution for deploying these systems in challenging environments, we believe we bring the latest commercially available datacenter-level technology and products to this market.

Business Strategy

We continue to execute our strategic commitment to the rugged edge HPC market, and we believe that our engagement in the markets and with customers, supported by our portfolio of products and solutions, validates this approach. In this portfolio, we are witnessing some of our highest margins, repeat business, and expanding levels of interest. To this end, we have built a five year pipeline of target opportunities in excess of one billion dollars.

Although we are seeing progress, it will continue to take time to pursue, secure, and turn these target opportunities into increased revenue and profits, especially as we secure platform and incumbent positions in the military market. As part of this strategy, we are consistently focusing on expanding the number of customers and platforms while also securing multi-year contract opportunities. We believe this focus provides us with a unique opportunity to drive growth and shareholder value. We will continue to execute current profitable business where we offer product and solution differentiation, but our primary focus will be on our rugged edge HPC strategy.

We continue to see and pursue opportunities in both the commercial/industrial and military/government segments. In our military business, we will leverage commerciality to maintain margins. Commerciality is the ability to use commercial market pricing in defense procurements. We believe a balanced portfolio of commercial and military customers can serve as a strategic benefit in execution of the business, strategy, and growth. We believe that both commercial and military markets are currently seeing an influx of autonomy and AI/ML applications that may be driving market growth and strengthening opportunities. We believe commercial adoption of AI/ML is dramatically moving to the edge across almost all business segments. We believe that military spend on autonomy and AI/ML represents one of the fastest areas of growth as the US and allied nations look to augment existing capabilities and field new sensors, platforms and weapon systems to maintain advantage over adversaries.

During 2025, we expanded our PCIe expansion portfolio with the launch of Ponto, a PCIe Gen 5 datacenter-focused expansion platform, and announced next-generation PCIe Gen 6.0 cable adapters and related expansion products to address emerging high-wattage AI accelerator requirements.

A key element of our business strategy is a product strategy based on technology leadership. We believe a first-to-market strategy is key to our ability to continue to win significant opportunities. As a result, we continue to develop new state-of-the-art products across a range of HPC demand, aiming to provide a unique value proposition for our customers in the targeted spaces. Current engagements for our products in the military space cover various autonomy, sensor fusion and AI/ML applications, including for aircraft, drones, ships, helicopters, and land vehicles, as the Pentagon prioritizes incorporating advanced technologies into their equipment. We have pursued these engagements throughout 2025 by incorporating an AI compute and storage product strategy that applies OSS expertise in three product levels that cover the needs of land, sea and air deployments.

At the high end, we introduced Torrey Break, which is an edge super-computing platform based on the latest PCIe 5.0 technology. We believe that this product is currently the highest performance, most compact supercomputer in the market that can survive the most demanding edge environments, especially those in military programs available today and in the future. It brings to market the latest in Graphics Processing Units (“GPU”), Central Processing Unit (“CPU”), high speed PCI express switch fabric, and memory products in a rugged compact form factor, to meet sensor processing, sensor fusion and AI/ML applications in this space. Torrey Break has lead customer interest from multiple large military prime contractors as well as the U.S. Department of Defense (“DOD”) directly for key, high visibility programs that we are pursuing.

At the mid-level, we have fielded our Short-depth Servers (“SDS”) in many commercial and government program wins due to its flexibility. The SDS provides integrated AI compute, data recording, and storage at a performance level approaching Rigel, suitable for wider market adoption. In 2025, the 3U SDS was adopted by two additional original equipment manufacturer ("OEM") customers in medical and government markets that accounted for two new program wins. These systems utilized our first-to-market advanced cold plate liquid cooling technologies that widen the environments in which the SDS can be deployed. Top commercial applications for the SDS include edge data analytics for applications in medical and autonomy. Top applications for government use include AI sensor fusion, simulation, capturing AI datasets through data recording, and serving high-speed data to crews with our Ion Accelerator™ data storage software in ships, submarines, and aircraft.

At the low end of performance, but with a higher level of ruggedization, we have shipped our Sensor Concentrator, Cernis™ and Donati™ to more government customers. These products create the most compact solution for autonomy, AI/ML, and visualization, such as 360-degree situational awareness. The Sensor Concentrator, Donati CPU/GPU compute and visualization systems are interconnected using the Cernis PCIe switch, creating an optimized data path that takes advantage of OSS low latency breakthroughs in PCIe interconnect, typically found in higher performance products like Torrey Break and SDS servers, while being highly rugged for use in wheeled and tracked land vehicles that require conduction cooling.

Our ability to drive the leading edge of technology is enhanced by our strong relationships with strategic component manufacturers, including NVIDIA (for GPUs, ARM processors and networking), NetList and Micron (for flash memory), Broadcom (for PCIe switch components), Microchip (for vehicle rated switch and functional safety processors), and Intel and AMD (for CPUs). In many cases, we have access to product roadmaps and other technical information relating to future technology. Access to this information allows us to begin our design process well before the future components we are designing even exist. We have also expanded our market relationships to embrace companies in the AI/ML software space. These efforts allow us to establish relationships that enable our ability to offer end-to-end solutions for customers while also creating opportunity for these software companies to standardize on our hardware platforms.

We anticipate that the steps we have taken in implementing our strategy and the fast-growing markets that we are pursuing will help to provide accelerated revenue and margin growth for the Company over the coming years.

Industry Background and Market Opportunity

The notion of network-based computing dates to the 1960s, but many believe the first use of “cloud computing” in its modern context occurred in 2006 when Google’s then-CEO, Eric Schmidt, introduced the term during an industry conference. Years later, the explosive growth of internet of things (“IoT”) connected devices, along with new applications that require real-time computing power, started to create the drive for edge-computing systems. As the demand for AI on the edge and autonomous vehicles grew, so did the need for high-performance solutions to operate in harsh environments and reduce risk of loss of connectivity to the cloud.

Edge computing is one of the fastest growing markets in the computing space, driven by the need to do more at the edge. The concept of edge computing is simply deploying compute systems closer to the actual user of the system, rather than communicating with a distant cloud computing facility.

Edge compute markets tend to implement sensor processing, sensor fusion, AI/ML, autonomous, and/or semi-autonomous solutions. We believe markets for these products are large and growing. Applications deploying these technologies today, or that we expect to do so in the future, include, without limitation:

We expect these applications to deploy increasingly faster computing systems at lower latencies to meet industry and competitive goals. Whereas the goal used to be for an edge compute platform to perform a single application, such as autonomous navigation, now this has been expanded to include in excess of ten or more AI applications running simultaneously. This expansion requires significantly more compute power and data storage, as well as lower latency, than traditional embedded computers can manage while operating in harsh, challenging, and space constrained environments.

Product Offerings

Our systems are built using the latest CPU, GPU, high speed switch fabrics, and flash storage technologies that draw upon years of expertise in designing and manufacturing custom, semi-custom, as well as standard systems for military and commercial customers. We have a history of being first-to-market with many solutions for emerging technologies. Our technological leadership includes linking different OSS product systems together.

We use leading edge, state-of-the art components from major technology providers to design purpose-built systems that solve customer problems in an efficient, cost-effective manner. We apply the component technology provided by Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, Micron, Broadcom, Microchip, and others to deliver solutions to provide true value to our customers.

Four technologies are fundamental to the edge computing space: edge servers, GPU compute accelerators, flash memory-based storage, and high-speed switch fabric for data acquisition I/O. These technologies enable systems to ingest, process and store data at significantly higher rates than traditional systems. By harnessing these components, customers can process data much more quickly and in a more secure manner and, as a result, turn raw data into advantage in action.

Rugged Edge Servers

While simple AI applications, such as facial recognition to open a door to a secure area, may run on a traditional low power embedded processor, the needs of edge computing applications require datacenter-class server performance brought to a mobile platform. The sheer amount and speed of sensor processing, sensor fusion and AI/ML processing for operating an autonomous vehicle or a mobile weapon system requires multiple high-speed digitizers, high-performance networking, the fastest flash storage devices, and server-class processors. We enable the power of the datacenter to be deployed at the edge without compromising performance by employing groundbreaking ruggedization and cooling technologies for edge servers operating from various vehicle AC and DC power sources in small spaces.

GPU Compute Acceleration

When GPU technology and solid-state flash were first introduced, we began designing systems that maximize the effectiveness of these technologies. We now produce compute-systems with large numbers of GPUs and flash memory that communicate over PCIe and allow faster processing, data storage, and data retrieval. The more GPUs and flash devices available to a server, the faster that system can process and store data.

The capabilities and speed of GPU accelerated computers are driving significant advances in AI and machine learning. Massive amounts of data are collected, stored, and analyzed by today’s sophisticated algorithms. We are enabling the growth of such AI capability by adding scale with rugged systems that complement the highest performance rugged servers.

High Density Solid-State Flash Storage

The proliferation of larger and larger data sets used in edge computing, including AI, is feeding the need for higher capacity and higher performance storage devices. Traditionally, companies have used hard disk drives for their primary storage. Hard disk drive-based systems are being replaced by flash memory-based systems, which offer higher capacity, performance, reliability, and ruggedness. Flash-based storage systems also consume significantly less power. Our solutions offer the highest capacity and performance with the addition of removable media which enables the quick transportation and delivery of massive amounts of data.

Switch Fabrics For High Speed Data

At the front-end of edge compute systems is high speed data acquisition technology through switch fabrics. Depending on the application, data can be generated from a wide array of sensors and inputs. In many cases, such as autonomous driving or a mobile weapon system, platform data is generated through arrays of video, Light Detection and Ranging (“LIDAR”), radar, Forward Looking Infrared (“FLIR”), Radio Frequency (“RF”), and other computationally intensive sensors. Our PCI express based switch fabrics provide the highest speed and lowest latency data acquisition and movement.

When PCIe was introduced in 2005, we were the first company to produce PCIe over cable adapters allowing system-to-system communication at the same speed as internal Input/Output (“I/O”) expansion, significantly reducing latency. Today, we are one of the largest providers of PCIe adapters and expansion components used worldwide.

What Sets OSS Apart

We believe several factors differentiate OSS from other suppliers of high-performance edge computing solutions, including, without limitation, the following:

We have consistently followed a strategy of being first-to-market in leading edge deployment technologies by designing and developing products that are delivered before our competitors. We currently have products spanning the spectrum of high-performance computing, including servers, flash storage, GPU acceleration, networking, and PCIe data acquisition I/O expansion. Within these product areas, the approach implies that we:

Earnings Growth Strategy

We intend to implement different strategies to increase our revenue growth, while improving earnings. We believe that earnings growth can be accomplished by taking the following actions:

Revenue growth driven by existing OEM and new design wins:

Higher margins:

Optimize expenses:

Our Opportunity

We believe the worldwide edge computing market is expected to grow rapidly. Within this market, we are positioned and focused on the AI/autonomous portion at the very edge.The products we develop to address this market include high performance compute, storage servers, and PCIe acceleration systems that can perform in the most challenging environments. If an application needs AI and/or autonomous capabilities, and it moves, OSS strives to deliver the highest performance solutions that will survive and enable these challenging applications.

Our Technology

We design and manufacture ruggedized high performance edge computing systems, which are designed to increase compute performance while surviving in harsh environments. Our rugged servers bring the power of leading-edge datacenter-class technologies to the edge for applications in AI/ML, sensor fusion, autonomous navigation, data logging, and video rendering. Our high-density compute accelerators connect directly to a server’s PCIe bus, delivering substantial compute performance. Our flash storage arrays support hundreds of terabytes of high-speed storage that can also be accessed by multiple servers.

Technology Drivers for OSS High-Performance Computing Business

We have developed expertise and core competencies in the three fundamental technology drivers within today’s high-performance edge computing market: high-speed serial interconnect technology, compute acceleration utilizing GPUs, and low latency flash storage. We believe that in combination, these three fundamental technologies, underpinned by PCI Express, are changing the economics of computing, bringing high-performance computing within the grasp of a wide range of new industries and commercial applications on the edge. Simultaneously, the emergence of massive amounts of data being generated by advanced sensors is pushing the requirement for innovative state-of-the-art technology. We are enabling this technology to be deployed at the edge by merging these fundamental technologies with our expertise in providing system level optimization to meet requirements for ruggedization and SWAP constraints. Our strategy is to be the disruptive leader in platforms for rugged edge applications, based on our unique ability to design high-quality, high-performance AI workflow compute/storage engines that can be deployed in harsh dynamic environments, which require unique system-level features for vibration, cooling, and power. Because our target platforms operate on land, in the air, and at sea, our compute systems must be compact, withstand harsh conditions and power disruptions, and deliver datacenter-class performance. We believe this is what we do well.

We strive to not only provide competitive advantage for our customers, but also to address some of the most fundamental challenges in military and industrial applications. We believe that we are well situated to leverage these major industry forces. By exploiting our unique set of expertise in the underpinning technologies of high-performance computing, we strive to continue to deliver industry leading solutions, disruptive at times, and to take advantage of the opportunity to capture a growing market share in this rapidly expanding marketplace.

Switched Serial Interconnect

Switched serial interconnects are the data highways connecting many elements of today’s high-performance computing platforms. At ever increasing speeds, these pathways move data between a system’s processing units, storage, networking, and peripheral elements. For high-performance computing, the primary processing, storage, and peripheral interconnect is PCIe. PCIe Gen 6.0 has an ability to run up to 16 lanes in parallel, which allows up to 256 gigabytes (full duplex) per second bandwidth between system elements. In 2025, we launched next-generation PCIe Gen 6.0 products, including CopprLink™ cable adapters, designed to meet increasing performance demands in edge computing. We expect to further address target markets with PCIe Gen 6.0, Compute Express Link, and related technologies in 2026 and beyond.

Compute Acceleration with GPUs

GPUs have evolved from graphics display acceleration to general-purpose processing workhorses for high-performance computing systems. Today, most of the fastest supercomputers in the world utilize GPUs as their primary compute engines. GPUs are ideal for high-performance computing workloads, including AI training and inference, because of their ability to complete massively parallel processing. While traditional CPUs may have dozens of processing cores, GPUs have thousands of cores that are able to execute calculations simultaneously.

NVIDIA, a key supplier of GPUs to the market, lists more than 500 such applications across a broad set of market spaces, along with focused teams on specific industries of high growth potential such as their NVIDIA Drive team for autonomous navigation. We believe the main markets serviced by NVIDIA GPUs include, without limitation:

While we believe NVIDIA is focused on the deployment of their GPUs in hyperscale datacenters and for consumer gaming purposes, we are focused on taking the datacenter class capability to the edge compute market, expanding the overall market significantly. Many of these applications also scale performance, based on the number of GPU components utilized. We have designed multi-GPU systems, including up to 16 GPUs in a single system. Current state-of-the art GPUs (NVIDIA B300) provide over 30 petaflops (FP4) of performance, with future products such as the NVIDIA Rubin, AMD MI400 series and Intel Gaudi series GPUs expected to dramatically increase overall processing capabilities in the years to come.

GPUs also pose significant system design challenges due to their high-power requirements. High-end GPUs can require 1000 watts of power or more, which generates a tremendous amount of heat. Sophisticated power distribution and cooling designs are required, especially for large-scale systems with multiple GPUs per chassis. OSS has significant expertise in addressing these challenges.

PCI Express Flash Storage – NVMe protocol

The use of flash memory technology for system storage has gained traction over the past decade, which we believe to be a result of the continuous decline in the cost per gigabyte. Flash memory has become the ubiquitous storage technology in high-performance systems.

Combined with the move away from traditional rotating hard drive technology, there has been the trend toward eliminating traditional storage protocols in favor of low latency flash memory protocols. Newer flash memory modules utilize a protocol known as NVMe, which connects the flash memory directly to the system’s PCIe interconnect.

This direct connection allows for very high bandwidth between the storage and the other system elements, which eliminates the need for protocol translation as data moves from storage subsystems to and from the compute complex.

Today, flash memory modules with capacities up to 120 terabytes and PCIe Gen 6.0 interfaces are now available for engineering samples. PCIe Gen 6.0 devices are expected to be available for general availability purchase in 2026 with capacities up to 240 terabytes. Our flash storage arrays with up to two petabytes of capacity are available, enabling the scaling of high-speed storage to meet the full range of high-performance edge application requirements.

OSS aims to leverage the latest technology to build complete storage and data logging systems, including all the software to provide the highest density and performance in a compact form factor ideal for vehicles of all types. This, combined with our hot swappable canisters, has enabled autonomous truck and military aircraft applications.

Our Core Technical Capabilities

We have developed unique expertise and core competency across the fundamental technologies of today’s rapidly expanding specialized high-performance edge computing marketplace. These valuable assets are embedded in the leading-edge engineering capabilities of our engineers, the proprietary intellectual property residing in our vast library of designs, and our brand equity based on our reputation as a high-quality producer of state-of-the-art, custom and standard solutions across a broad array of markets.

High Speed System Interconnect Design

Our electrical engineers are experts in high-speed digital signaling design. They have continually designed at the leading edge of the state-of-the-art signaling speeds, even as semiconductor technology has driven up the clock rate of digital transmission. We have consistently been among a small handful of companies able to come to market first with the latest technology. In fact, we delivered the industry’s first PCIe over cable solutions for PCIe Gen 1.0, Gen 2.0, Gen 3.0, Gen 4.0, Gen 5.0, and Gen 6.0. The expertise required includes circuit design, PCB (printed circuit board) layout, and routing optimizations, all of which focus on achieving the highest levels of signal integrity. In our current systems, PCIe Gen 6.0 signals are propagated across multiple PCBs and connectors, as well as both copper and fiber optic cabling, while maintaining the ability to recognize digital signal transitions at 32 billion times per second.

In high-performance computing systems, especially those systems that operate at the edge, the trajectory and need for ever-increasing signaling speeds is continuing; however, the number of companies that have the capability to design robust, highly reliable systems at speeds that can tolerate harsh conditions at the edge is limited. We believe our core competency in large-scale, high-speed design and layout will allow us to remain at the forefront of this growing industry.

Complex System Design

In addition to signal integrity design expertise, we have amassed expertise and intellectual property in high-performance system architecture design and software. This expertise allows us to develop extremely sophisticated systems with massive scaling, while also meeting customer demands for reliability, cost, and flexibility. To do so, we have developed deep knowledge for high-capacity input/output systems, operating system adjustments, and required configuration tuning. Because of this, our engineers are often called upon to co-design with OEM designers to create the perfect solution to fit the needs of their customers.

For highly scalable systems, a deep understanding and experience with switching topologies, interconnect fabric design, and low latency acceleration software is required. We have worked with serial switching technology, starting with the first generation of PCIe, and have been an innovator in creating unique and flexible topologies to meet the specific needs of customers. Creating custom solutions for unique customer requirements is a core competency at OSS, and we rely on this deep knowledge of switch capabilities and limitations.

Our software expertise includes developing unique hardware drivers and configuration software that accelerate bandwidth and lower latency in PCIe GPU and NVMe system designs. We have developed expertise in system design to leverage peer-to-peer data flows between GPUs, as well as pioneering techniques for optimized data flows between flash storage and GPU compute-engines. Our systems optimize switch and GPU configuration topologies to optimize GPU-to-GPU communication without requiring latency-inducing data transfer between host dual processors.

Our platforms feature RDMA (remote direct memory access) across compute-nodes, which support data transfer without burdening the host CPU, as well as NVMe over Fabrics for efficient data transfer from remote storage to compute.

We have pioneered the ability to extend the PCIe bus beyond the confines of a single enclosure, opening the possibility of flexible system expansion options. We believe we are one of the leading designers and suppliers of PCIe host bus adapters that extend PCIe signals from the host motherboard across copper or optical cables to expansion enclosures, which provide application acceleration through scale. Our adapters provide both ends of the external cable connection. Our expertise in high-speed signal design in printed circuit boards, connectors, and cables is essential to successful expansion designs. We also hold expertise in incorporating clustering and rack scale expansion into our system designs, including 200/400/800 gigabit Ethernet, 200/400 gigabit InfiniBand, and emerging PCIe top-of-rack switch technology.

Expertise in power, cooling, and mechanical design are required to address the requirements of high-performance computing customers, especially while meeting the constrained time requirements of rugged edge deployments. We have developed leadership design capability in high-power design and distribution within large rack enclosures as well as edge optimized configurations. High-end GPUs today require 500-675 watts or above, and in our high-end systems, up to 32 GPUs can reside in a single chassis. Thousands of kilowatts of redundant power are required. Power stability and huge thermal loads are some of the critical design issues that must be addressed. Additionally, at the edge for AI applications, a wide range of input power sources need to be supported from standard 110-220 VAC and 48-270 VDC for terrestrial vehicles as well as three phase 400-800Hz AC for airborne applications.

We have expertise in power distribution, redundant power, and complex chassis cooling design, including materials selection, airflow simulation, fan technology, and various liquid cooling options including direct to chip conductive cooling and single and dual phase immersion cooling. We have also developed extensive expertise to help ensure regulatory compliance of our complex high-performance computing system designs that span across emission, shock, vibration, thermal, humidity, and other environmental requirements that are required for highly reliable and highly available solutions. Our engineers are experts in design for regulatory testing for FCC (Federal Communications Commission), CE (European Conformity), UL (Underwriters Laboratories), and Mil-STD (Military Standard) standards. Additionally, we have expertise in rapid prototyping, design for manufacturability, and design for serviceability.

We also have expertise in system management software that enhances our competitive advantages and provides robust monitoring and management of the functions of complex computer systems. While the baseboard management controllers ("BMCs") of standard servers and workstations provide passable system management for an office or datacenter with a benign environment, the unique missions of our rugged edge systems require a more diverse level of monitoring, management. and control.

First, products like our 4UPro and EB line of PCIe high density expansion systems are not servers or workstations, but instead, they provide scale-out expansion of high-performance GPUs, FPGAs, NVMe drives and edge I/O devices to a server. To provide the widest compatibility and largest serviceable market for our expansion systems, our U-BMC, or “Unified Baseboard Management Controller,” allows our expansion systems to seamlessly integrate with existing customer servers or our own SDS and EOS server products, allowing a server and one or more of our expansion products to be managed, monitored and controlled, as if it were a single integrated system with a massive amount of PCIe resources interconnected by our highest bandwidth, lowest latency PCIe switched fabric.

Second, unlike the standard datacenter server, our servers are designed to operate in both defense and commercial harsh edge environments where “dirty” power from generators, engines and batteries with large spikes are common. Mix in the environmental conditions in which our servers may operate autonomously, such as temperature variances in places from Death Valley to 50,000 feet altitude, with moisture ranging from salt fog to rain and extreme vibration and shock from washboard dirt roadways to a hard-landing propeller aircraft, and one can see that a higher level of management, monitoring and control than a server snug in a power and cooling conditioned datacenter is required. The U-BMC adds unique value to server-level systems in these environments, especially in autonomous operations where there are no service technicians for miles, by allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions automatically or by remote control without failing. The U-BMC has features to handle these environments, such as controlling sensors connected to the server, turning on heaters in extreme cold, changing the PCIe fabric to reroute data around failed components and connecting to the Controller Area Network ("CAN") bus in cars and autonomous trucks to monitor the vehicle conditions to be able to take action on information provided by the vehicle, such as ignition on/off. Many more U-BMC edge features unique to OSS and valuable to our customers were in development in 2025 and will continue to be added in 2026, such as instant cryptographic erasure of sensitive information, access to add-in card telemetry for modules supporting MCTP reporting standards, and throttling NVIDIA GPUs in real time based on power or temperature fluctuations to keep systems running in a reduced state rather than shutting down.

Third, due to operating in diverse industry standard and regulatory markets required by military standards, commercial aerospace FAA or EASA, and highway NHTSA or ETSC agencies, the U-BMC is designed to adapt to the unique requirements imposed by servers residing on, or controlling, vehicles. A standard datacenter server BMC needs to conform to the basic agency requirements of electrical interference and personal safety regulated by agencies such as the FCC or CE and administered by testing companies such as UL and TüV. The U-BMC is designed to cover all edge requirements of the datacenter as well as adding standards organization compliance, such as those required by military customers, including SOSA compliant functions for sensor management, system management, and task management not found in datacenter server BMCs.

In 2022, we introduced the U-BMC, which is included in our Rigel edge supercomputer and PCIe Gen 5 4UPro products. In 2023 and 2024, we expanded the platforms that include the U-BMC to the PCIe Gen5 SDS rugged server. In 2025 we added the PCI3 Gen5 Torrey Break 2U SDS for commercial and military edge applications with more platforms to come. With U-BMC, we provide “single pane of glass” management of complex systems, even if the server is in a separate enclosure, and an open-source Redfish API for easy integration with industry-standard management tools. We expect to continue to expand and enhance our licensable software to create additional value, barriers to entry, and stickiness with our program wins.

Storage Management Software

Given our hardware design and integration expertise, we believe that our robust software capability allows us to offer more optimized and customized systems. Our Ion Accelerator™ software design team provides the expertise to deliver full server and storage solutions that produce the highest performance from today’s leading-edge flash storage devices. The Ion Accelerator software allows flash-based modules to be put into a variety of storage and network configurations which can then be accessed by multiple edge servers. The Ion Accelerator software can do this cost-effectively, while preserving the low latency and security that is vital for many mission-critical applications, from secure network boot, database, and transaction processing to massive data collection programs.

Benefits of Technology and Core Capabilities to our Customers

Due to our core capabilities, we can provide our high-performance computing customers with platforms that are highly reliable and cost effective. Such performance allows our customers to solve larger problems faster, and save the cost and time of highly paid engineers, data scientists, and other human resources. We believe our technology enhances innovation by allowing more “what-if” analysis in a finite amount of time. Our price/performance leadership aims to enhance our customers’ competitiveness and lower capital expense and total cost of ownership. We work with our OEM customers to develop custom “perfect fit solutions” for their unique requirements when the anticipated return justifies the investment.

Our Products

Compute Servers

Within the server sector, we have secured a niche position building purpose-built specialty servers, which the major server suppliers do not supply, as they require custom tuning and special features that major OEMs cannot easily provide. Our compute servers are designed to provide the highest level of performance that can be deployed in harsh edge environments. Our expansion optimized short depth (“SDS”) and Torrey Break server product lines are optimized for supporting a high number of add-in cards such as GPUs, FPGAs, NVMe drives and sensor inputs. Servers in this product family have a number of slots that are compatible with the PCIe host bus interface cards that we have developed. These cards enable PCIe connection over cable between the host processor and downstream I/O devices. These servers have custom basic input/output systems (“BIOS”) to ensure they work seamlessly with expansion chassis and support a high number of downstream I/O devices. Our SDS and Torrey Break products also support rugged deployment in space constrained environments providing a maximum depth of 20 inches. We believe that our “Rigel Edge Super Computer” (“Rigel”) is the highest performing, most dense, AI-compute platform that is deployable in extreme environments, including on military aircraft. We expanded our PCIe 5.0 server configurations in 2025 and are positioned to upgrade those systems to PCIe 6.0 as the market makes PCI 6.0 processors, NVMe storage, and GPU accelerators available in the second half of 2026.

GPU computing uses hardware components that are optimized to perform mathematical calculations in a rapid fashion. NVIDIA is the market leader in the design and manufacturing of these components. We work closely with NVIDIA to design and build systems which use multiple GPUs to accelerate applications.

Emerging markets and applications such as AI, image rendering and processing, autonomous vehicles, deep learning, molecular modeling, genomics, advanced visualization, machine learning, and image processing all benefit from the ability to use GPUs to accelerate the application. We build specialized compute-servers and accelerators used in these emerging growth markets. We estimate these markets to be very large and growing.

Storage Servers

We also build standard and custom flash storage arrays utilizing our unique know-how in PCIe device fan-out, packaging, cooling, and PCIe-over-cable. We deliver dense, high-performance systems that provide customers with high value and utility in the most demanding, data-intensive operations. These OSS storage servers complement our compute servers to provide an end-to-end edge solution for AI workflows.

Through a strategic agreement with Western Digital, we acquired an exclusive software license for Ion Accelerator™ Storage Area Networking (“SAN”) source code and software development rights, and we hired their core engineering team in July 2017. Since acquiring this software asset, we have extended its capability to align with our edge computing strategy by adding Network Attached Storage (“NAS”), support for NVMe flash drives, NVMe over Fabric expansion capability, and several encryption methods required for government security applications. We have also implemented a proprietary Follow Me™ capability for removing a bulk pack of NVMe drives that can be easily transported to another system without rebuilding the data, operating much like a massive capacity USB stick. This provides our flash arrays with a high level of differentiation relating to storage management, latency, portability, and throughput. We provide standard flash array products and have the in-house hardware and software expertise to provide customized systems for demanding applications that are not suitable for standard offerings. For example, we provide products to a large military contractor for integration into military aircraft that requires us to design and manufacture a highly ruggedized mil-spec flash array. The resulting product provides high data density with low weight, a high degree of portability, and security for data protection. We believe our experience and capability in high speed, low-latency, digital signaling via PCIe gives us an edge in providing custom designs to OEMs, military programs, and other special purpose applications.

We believe that because our products are positively differentiated by speed, density, and management features for challenging edge applications, our offerings compete favorably in this market and provide a substantial growth opportunity.

PCIe Expansion and Adaptors

PCIe is the high-speed standard for communications within a computer. This standard defines the signals and connectors (i.e., slots) that are used for computer add-in cards (such as Ethernet or graphics). Traditionally, communication between computers in the network is completed via Ethernet. Although Ethernet is great for large networks, this introduces delays and latency challenges. To keep performance at the highest level, PCIe signaling can also be routed over a cable, allowing expansion input/output slots to be physically located in a separate chassis. This provides for high-performance and low latency, which are essential in this market.

Being able to separate the server from the I/O expansion, by using PCIe over a cable, facilitates disaggregation of server functionality. That is, with PCIe, server I/O functions no longer need to be contained in the physical server chassis, but instead, can be separated into a separate chassis and continue to operate at full speed. This offers many advantages over higher latency and power consuming traditional networking communications like Ethernet. From a practical perspective, servers can be connected directly to larger storage arrays or other peripheral devices, with the resulting group of chassis operating as if they were all in the same physical chassis.

We began developing our first PCIe-over-cable adaptor in 2006 and were one of the early providers of PCIe adaptors. We recognized this space as a prime opportunity to utilize our core strengths, such as:

This technology has now become a standard within the computer industry. Our customers have used our adaptors to connect their custom input/output chassis and achieve performance equivalence as if the I/O was integrated into the server box. This gives designers and integrators a degree of flexibility and utility in architecting computer systems that is unprecedented. We have expanded our PCIe adaptor market in breadth and depth, including making adaptors for many OEM customers.

With our expertise developed in designing adaptor cards, the logical extension of our capability led us to develop a method for expanding the PCIe bus into an external chassis containing one or many expansion slots and using this expansion to provide storage and AI application acceleration. This allows a customer to install multiple standard PCIe boards into a chassis and accelerate their system without having to add additional servers. These are typically GPUs, FPGAs, or NVMe drives to create large-scale Compute and Storage appliances. For example, we have developed a product for deployment in a mobile command center which aggregates large amounts of high frequency data from sensors and allows in the field AI algorithms to operate in real time. This is achieved through a cluster of our compute and storage products. A user can now connect a multiplicity of PCIe devices to a single server using a single memory domain, and achieve performance throughput and low latency, which was not possible prior to the introduction of PCIe.

We have been a leader in PCIe acceleration through generations 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0. We delivered our initial PCIe Gen 5.0 products in 2022, well ahead of any of our direct competitors, and we announced our PCIe Gen 6.0 cable adapters in 2025 and will start shipping these products to customers throughout 2026. As PCIe evolves through generations 7.0 and beyond, we believe that we are uniquely positioned to continue our leadership role in this market. We currently offer what we believe to be the largest PCIe acceleration product line, with chassis and backplanes that offer expansion from one to 64 slots. Due to its greater data throughput, lower latency, and flexibility of design, we believe this is a growing market, and we intend to maintain our leadership role.

Customers

We work to deliver the highest performance scalable products and solutions that enable AI/ML, sensor fusion, and sensor processing for global defense and commercial markets. We serve a global clientele consisting of multinational companies, governmental agencies, military contractors, military services, and leading technology providers.

Sales and Marketing

Our sales and marketing efforts are focused on the identification, engagement, and closure of significant targeted opportunities within the edge compute market.

Sales (OSS)

Our OSS sales efforts consist of five main channels:

Marketing Communications

Our marketing communications department is responsible for positioning OSS as an expert, thought leader, and visionary in the edge compute market. We generate expert content to support our market leading products, while also building cost effective brand/product awareness in several ways. We use traditional and non-traditional marketing communications, as well as partnerships and word of mouth, to convey the uniqueness and compelling value of our products and services. The edge compute market applications we target include AI inference applications in autonomous vehicles, medical equipment, commercial aerospace, defense/government, agriculture, and mining. Among the many channels utilized are:

Competition

Our core business is to provide specialized high-performance edge AI computing platforms to customers who incorporate these products into their complete solutions for rugged AI compute and storage markets. By contrast, competitors in the AI hardware market space typically provide solutions designed to meet either high performance non-rugged or low performance highly rugged applications. Although a fragmented market, there are a number of categories of potential competitors of our products.

Customer in-house design resources

Many of our larger target OEM customers, such as Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, have in-house engineering design resources, which could be used as an alternative to engaging with us. This potential competition is mitigated by the technical specialization that we have, especially in high-end and large-scale PCI Express switch fabrics and PCI Express acceleration capabilities where the option to “buy” provides a better return to “make” in an internal make/buy decision. OEMs can invest their in-house resources on value-add capabilities within their specific vertical market and outsource these horizontal technology capabilities to us. We have also developed a trusted partner relationship with many of these OEMs and have established a market reputation for technical expertise and a responsive and cost-effective engagement model. We win when our customers realize that together we can produce better products faster, and more cost-effectively than they can by themselves. This has proven to be particularly evident when customers require state-of-the-art products that are constructed of commercially available parts but need to be deployed in harsh mobile environments. This has resulted in several program wins that demonstrate our flexibility and how we can work closely with large OEM and government customers.

Major Tier 1 & 2 Mainstream Computer, GPU and Storage Vendors

These vendors offer mainstream high-performance computing platforms, including servers and storage systems that can address some applications at the edge in our target markets. Typically, they do not, however, offer the enhanced value platforms or customization capabilities that we specialize in to meet unique form factor, power, ruggedization or scale out requirements sought by OEM customers. Generally, these vendors focus on the large, air-conditioned datacenters and compete with such vendors based on price/volume, as differentiation is challenging. Our strategy is specifically designed to avoid head-to-head competition in this part of the market with this class of vendors. In some scenarios, we can provide a complementary specialized component or building block, which interfaces with one of these vendors’ mainstream products. Examples of companies in this space include NVIDIA, HP, Dell/EMC, IBM, SuperMicro, Pure Storage, and NetApp.

Vertical High Performance Compute Vendors – Military/Aerospace

In certain vertical markets, there are competitors who focus primarily on the HPC military and aerospace markets. These vendors often provide complete solutions, including both hardware and software, and some specialization in terms of form factor and ruggedization. In these markets, we provide unique capability in terms of scaling of PCI Express components over cable (copper and fiber) that can address unique requirements of specific military or government programs. Many of these competitors use older technologies or low power processors and components in these more challenging environments. We are able to differentiate ourselves from such competitors due to the fact that we deploy the latest high-performance technology, which enables us to provide superior products to potential customers in this space. We believe we have also established good relationships with prime contractors and governmental agencies (Raytheon, Sierra Nevada, Lockheed, Boeing, NASA, GVSC, L3Harris, and others), which can be important influencers or decision makers on technology selection. Competitors in this space include companies such as Mercury, Crystal, Curtiss Wright, Kontron, Trenton, Core Systems and Systel. In the past, we have been able to offer the latest differentiated technology to the rugged edge, which is normally only deployed in commercial applications, well before our competitors.

Manufacturing and Operations

Currently, OSS is certified under AS9100, the international standard for aerospace, space, and defense manufacturing. This means we have demonstrated our ability to consistently provide products that meet both customer requirements and applicable government regulations or statutory requirements. AS9100 is the pinnacle of quality management systems recognized by government and aerospace companies world-wide. It also indicates that we have programs and processes in place to ensure a high level of customer satisfaction, as well as continuous improvement and risk mitigation programs that ensure we get better over time.

While OSS primarily utilizes lean principles to drive our manufacturing and assembly processes, we recognize the importance of smooth builds and strategic inventory in this current climate of sustained supply chain shortages. One of the key aspects of utilizing lean principles is our application of just-in-time principles to ensure effective ordering and utilization of inventory. This also helps optimize cash flow throughout the manufacturing cycle. Within the manufacturing process, our operations encompass three categories of “builds”:

We are dedicated to quality and customer satisfaction. Our continuous improvement efforts require us to review products, services, and processes with the idea that minor changes can lead to greater outcomes for our customers. Although we serve the high-end of the rugged edge computing space, we are constantly leveraging lean principles to become more efficient and drive down costs while driving up margins and quality.

Research and Development

Our ability to compete successfully in our industry is heavily dependent upon our ability to ensure a continuous and timely flow of competitive products, services, and technologies to the marketplace. We continue to develop new products and technologies and to enhance existing products that will further drive commercialization. We may also expand the range of our product offerings and intellectual property through licensing and/or acquisitions of third-party businesses and technologies.

Our intellectual property research and development is focused on the exploitation of key technologies as they evolve in the marketplace. Our product roadmap reflects new technologies for CPUs, GPUs, flash storage, and advanced PCIe switches. We design first-to-market, unique implementations targeted at the edge compute market utilizing market leading component technologies. Accordingly, our focus lies not in the capital-intensive development of silicon implementations of technologies (i.e., chips, processors, GPUs, or storage devices), but rather leverages leading-edge technologies to build first-to-market products that fully exploit those technologies to solve customer problems in challenging environments.

In addition, we will take on customer funded research and development programs where we can leverage our technology, capabilities and products to deliver a purpose designed solution that ultimately will transition into production. Strategically, this provides us with the opportunity to create an incumbent position on a platform or program that will provide recurring business opportunity as the effort moves from research and development, to initial fielding, formal production, and then sustainment and support.

Intellectual Property

Our primary intellectual property value emanates from the more than 600 individual design projects that we have undertaken over the decades since our founding, experience, and know how, in addition to trade secrets and copyrights. These designs are archived and cataloged; we rarely begin a new design from scratch, but rather, use our archived and cataloged designs as a starting point to efficiently provide products to our customers. In general, we maintain intellectual property rights with respect to the components of the products we design and sell so that we may continue to use them for future sales and development efforts. We also patent key innovations and solutions as and when required to protect our technical advantage.

Over the years, our team has developed and maintained expertise in high-speed signal design and analysis, electronic and mechanical packaging, PCIe-over-cable, fiber optics transmission, high-speed/density flash arrays, and integration and deployment of GPUs in compute accelerators and servers. This extensive expertise positions us to expand and rationalize our product line to meet the growing and ever-changing high-performance computing market. We believe that the expertise of our staff is a considerable asset closely related to intellectual property, and attracting and retaining highly qualified employees is essential to our business.

Markets, Seasonality, and Major Customers

Our products and services serve a global clientele consisting of multinational companies, governmental agencies, military contractors, and leading technology providers. We typically experience some level of seasonality, with lower deliveries in the first half of the year. We believe this is the result of varied government and commercial customer appropriation cycles and the timing of budgets.

In the year ended December 31, 2025, our top three customers comprised 22%, 22%, and 17% of revenue, respectively. No other customers exceeded 10% of revenue in 2025. In the year ended December 31, 2024, our top customer comprised 20% of revenue. No other customer exceeded 10% of revenue in 2024. Customer concentration figures represent continuing operations and exclude customer activity within discontinued operations.

We typically sell our products pursuant to contract supply agreements or purchase orders.

Materials and Suppliers

Although most components essential to our business are generally available from multiple sources, we believe that the loss or limited availability of certain component suppliers and manufacturing vendors could have a material adverse effect upon our business and financial condition.

Throughout 2024 and 2025, we experienced supply chain pressures, including protracted delivery dates for certain components, unavailability or limited supplies of certain products and components, increased product costs, and changes in minimum order quantities. Additionally, tariffs and changes in trade policy have impacted the costs of procuring certain components from non-US locations. We have worked with suppliers and customers to provide multiple options, including alternative sourcing of similar products.

In late 2025, a global shortage of certain memory products resulting from datacenter build-out demand led to significant increases in lead times, pricing volatility, and significant price increases. We have worked with our suppliers to secure availability of supply, including through the negotiation of long-term agreements. While we attempt to pass on component cost increases to our customers, our ability to do so is dependent upon many factors, including market conditions for the Company's products. Management is closely monitoring and managing impacts and potential impacts to our business from ongoing supply chain disruptions related to memory and other critical components. For more information, see the section titled, “Risk Factors” found in Part I, Item1A, of this Annual Report.

Human Capital Resources, Employees, and Personnel

We believe that our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to attract, hire, and retain qualified personnel. To achieve this objective, we strive to provide competitive compensation, benefits, equity participation, and a success driven work environment.

As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately 57 employees, of which 56 were full-time employees and one was a part-time employee; all of our employees were domestic. Our employees include highly skilled engineers, technicians, assemblers, and support staff. We are proud of the low voluntary turnover rate of our personnel to date, as we endeavor to continue to challenge our team and encourage input and creative thinking by all. Our management team strives to provide transparency to our employees through regular meetings designed to update employees on current metric driven results and future expectations.

None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement or represented by a labor union. We consider our relationship with our employees to be strong.

Environmental Matters

We are ISO14001 certified. ISO14001 is the internationally recognized standard for environmental management systems.

No significant pollution or other types of hazardous emission result from our operations and it is not anticipated that our operations will be materially affected by federal, state, or local provisions concerning environmental controls. Our costs of complying with environmental, health and safety requirements have not been material.

Furthermore, we do not believe that compliance with existing or pending climate change legislation, regulation, or international treaties or accords are reasonably likely to have a material effect in the foreseeable future on our business or markets that we serve, nor on our results of operations, capital expenditures, earnings, competitive position, financial position, or any of our operations. However, we will continue to monitor emerging developments in this area.

Government Approval and Effect of Government Regulations

Because our core business is to provide specialized high-performance edge computing building blocks and platforms to OEMs who incorporate these products into their complete solutions, which they sell to end users in specific vertical markets, we do not believe that any government agency approval is required for the products and services that we provide to our customers.

We believe that our operations are in compliance with all material applicable laws and regulations and that we hold all necessary permits to operate our business in each jurisdiction in which our facilities are located. Our worldwide business activities are subject to various laws, rules, and regulations of the United States as well as of foreign governments.

Compliance with these laws, rules, and regulations has not historically had a material effect upon our capital expenditures, results of operations, or competitive position. However, governmental regulations, including but not limited to import and export law, privacy laws, customer, and trade regulations, are subject to change and interpretation and may affect our business in the future. For more information, see the section titled, “Risk Factors” found in Part I, Item1A, of this Annual Report.

Company Website

We maintain a corporate Internet website at: http://www.onestopsystems.com.

The contents of our website are not incorporated in or otherwise to be regarded as part of this Annual Report. We file reports with the SEC which are available on our website free of charge. These reports include annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, “Section 16” filings on Form 3, Form 4, and Form 5, and other related filings, each of which is provided on our website as soon as reasonably practical after we electronically file such materials with or furnish them to the SEC. In addition, the SEC maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including the Company.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as the other information in this Annual Report, including our financial statements and the related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” before deciding whether to invest in our common stock. The occurrence of any of the events or developments described below could harm our business, financial condition, operating results, and growth prospects. In such an event, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations.

Risk Factors Summary

Below is a summary of the principal factors that make an investment in our securities speculative or risky. This summary does not address all of the risks that we face. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this “Risk Factors Summary” section, and other risks that we face, can be found below and should be carefully considered, together with other information included in this Annual Report.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

Business disruptions could harm our business, lead to a decline in revenues, and increase our costs.

Our worldwide operations could be disrupted by earthquakes, telecommunications failures, power or water shortages, outages at cloud service providers, tsunamis, floods, hurricanes, typhoons, fires, extreme weather conditions, cyber-attacks, terrorist attacks, war or military conflicts (such as the ongoing military conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the more recent conflicts in the Middle East), medical epidemics or pandemics and other natural or man-made disasters, catastrophic events or climate change. The occurrence of any of these disruptions could harm our business and result in significant losses, a decline in revenue and an increase in our costs and expenses. Any of these business disruptions could require substantial expenditure and recovery time in order to fully resume operations.

Our corporate headquarters, and a portion of our research and development activities, are located in California, and and some of our suppliers are located in Europe and Asia, near major earthquake faults known for seismic activity. The manufacture of product components, the final assembly of our products and other critical operations are concentrated in certain geographic locations, including California. Geopolitical change or changes in government regulations and policies in the United States or abroad may result in changing regulatory requirements, economic sanctions (such as those recently imposed by the United States and other countries on Russia), trade policies, import duties (such as recent tariffs applied on many imports) and economic disruptions that could impact our operating strategies, product demand, access to global markets, hiring, and profitability. In particular, revisions to laws or regulations or their interpretation and enforcement could result in increased taxation, trade sanctions, the imposition of additional import duties or tariffs, restrictions and controls on imports or exports, or other retaliatory actions, which could have an adverse effect on our business plans.

For example, regulations to implement the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 could have an adverse effect on our business plans. Additionally, tariffs and the threat of tariffs, including both United States sanctioned tariffs and the potential for retaliatory tariffs, have contributed to uncertainty and supply chain disruptions that could impact our operations. We conduct final assembly and test of products at our facility in California. However, we source components and subassemblies from both within and outside of the United States. While we attempt to pass on the cost of tariffs to our customers, our ability to do so is dependent upon many factors, including the predictability of tariff rates and market conditions for the Company's products. Potential changes in trade policy and tariff rates could result in increased costs, decreased revenue, or other negative effects to our financial condition.

Catastrophic events can also have an impact on third-party vendors who provide us with critical infrastructure services for IT and research and development systems and personnel. In addition, geopolitical and domestic political developments, such as existing and potential trade wars, political or social unrest, military conflicts, elections and post-election developments, and other events beyond our control, can increase levels of political and economic unpredictability globally and increase the volatility of global financial markets. Political instability or adverse political developments in or around any of the major countries in which we do business could also harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The ultimate impact on us, our third-party vendors and other suppliers and our general infrastructure of being located near major earthquake faults and being consolidated in certain geographical areas is unknown. In the event a major earthquake or other disaster or catastrophic event affects us or the third-party systems on which we rely, our business could be harmed as a result of declines in revenue, increases in expenses, substantial expenditures and time spent to fully resume operations. All of these risks and conditions could materially adversely affect our future sales and operating results.

We are currently operating in a period of economic uncertainty and geopolitical instability. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any negative impact on the global economy and capital markets resulting from military conflicts or any other geopolitical tensions.

U.S. and global markets are experiencing volatility and disruption following the escalation of geopolitical tensions in multiple regions of the world. Recently, international relations between the U.S. and Russia, certain Middle Eastern nations as well as certain other countries, has been strained, and they may continue to deteriorate further. Although the length and impact of the ongoing military conflicts are highly unpredictable, the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East could lead to market disruptions, including significant volatility in commodity prices, credit and capital markets, as well as supply chain interruptions. We are continuing to monitor the situation in Ukraine, the Middle East, and globally, and assessing its potential impact on our business.

Although our business has not been materially impacted by the ongoing military conflict between Russian and Ukraine, Israel and Hamas or other geopolitical instability to date, it is impossible to predict the extent to which our operations, or those of our suppliers and manufacturers, will be impacted in the short and long term, or the ways in which these conflicts may impact our business. The extent and duration of military actions, sanctions, and resulting market disruptions are impossible to predict, but could be substantial. Any such disruptions may also magnify the impact of other risks described in this Annual Report.

Volatile or recessionary conditions in the United States or abroad could adversely affect our business or our access to capital markets in a material manner.

Worsening economic and market conditions, downside shocks, or a return to recessionary economic conditions could severely reduce demand for our products and adversely affect our operating results. These economic conditions may also impact the financial condition of one or more of our key suppliers, which could affect our ability to secure product to meet our customers’ demand. Our results of operations and the implementation of our business strategy could be adversely affected by general conditions in the global economy. An economic downturn may cause uncertainty in the capital and credit markets and could have a material adverse effect on us. We could also be adversely affected by such factors as changes in foreign currency rates, weak economies, and political conditions in each of the countries in which we sell our products.

Adverse developments affecting the financial services industry, such as actual events or concerns involving liquidity, defaults, or non-performance by financial institutions or transactional counterparties, could adversely affect our current and projected business operations and our financial condition and results of operations.

Actual events involving reduced or limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions or other companies in the financial services industry or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumors about any events of these kinds, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems. For example, in March 2023, Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank were closed and taken over by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") as receiver. Although we did not have any cash or cash equivalent balances on deposit with Silicon Valley Bank or Signature Bank, similar events in the future could negatively affect investor confidence, the availability of credit, and overall market liquidity. Disruptions in the financial markets could result in higher interest rates, more restrictive lending terms, tighter financial covenants, or reduced access to capital. If we are unable to obtain financing on acceptable terms, or if access to our cash or liquidity resources is restricted, our ability to fund operations, meet financial obligations, or execute our business strategy could be adversely affected. Any of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, business operations, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may be adversely affected by the effects of inflation.

Inflation has the potential to adversely affect our liquidity, business, financial condition, and results of operations by increasing our overall cost structure, particularly if we are unable to achieve commensurate increases in the prices we charge our customers. Additionally, higher tariffs and the potential for higher tariffs may impact our product pricing or the cost of inputs to our production. The existence of inflation in the domestic and global economies may result in higher interest rates and capital costs, shipping costs, supply shortages, increased costs of labor, weakening exchange rates and other similar effects. As a result of inflation, we have experienced and may continue to experience, cost increases. If inflation increases for a prolonged period of time, or the rate of inflation in our markets were to increase, or if a global recession were to occur, our expenses could increase substantially. Although we may take measures to mitigate the impact of this inflation, if these measures are not effective, our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity could be materially adversely affected. Even if such measures are effective, there could be a difference between the timing of when these beneficial actions impact our results of operations and when the cost inflation is incurred.

The market for our products is developing and may not develop as we expect.

The market for cutting-edge, high-performance computing products is characterized by rapid advances in technologies. We believe our future success will depend in large part on our ability to develop products, new business initiatives and create innovative and custom designs for our customers. The growth of server clusters, specialized or high-performance applications, and hosted software solutions which require fast and efficient data processing, is crucial to our success. It is difficult to predict the development of the demand for high-performance computing, supercomputers, and related hardware solutions, the size and growth rate for this market, the entry of competitive products, or the success of existing competitive products.

Any expansion in our market depends on several factors, including the demand, cost, performance, and perceived value associated with our products. If our products are not adopted or there is a reduction in demand for our products caused by a lack of customer acceptance, a slowdown in demand for computational power, an overabundance of unused computational power, technological challenges, competing technologies and products, decreases in corporate spending, weakening economic conditions, or otherwise, it could result in reduced customer orders, early order cancellations, the loss of customers, or decreased sales, any of which would adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Governmental policies and regulations may also impact the development of the market for our products. For example, regulations around the use of AI may negatively impact certain of our customers and may affect the adoption of AI in certain of our target markets. The European Union Parliament adopted the EU AI Act, which introduces regulations and restrictions around the use of AI technologies. Additionally, Colorado has passed a bill introducing certain regulations around the use of AI. These and other regulatory or legislative actions related to the development and deployment of AI technologies could impact our business and our growth prospects.

Our operating results may fluctuate significantly, which makes our future operating results difficult to predict and could cause our operating results to fall below expectations or our guidance.

Our quarterly and annual operating results have fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate significantly in the future, which makes it difficult for us to predict our future operating results. The timing and size of sales of our products are variable and difficult to predict and can result in fluctuations in our net sales from period to period. This has been particularly challenging for us in connection with our recent transition to focus more heavily on the military and defense markets, as the sales cycles in this space tend to be longer and subject to additional variables that are outside of our control. In addition, our budgeted expense levels depend in part on our expectation of future sales. Any substantial adjustment to expenses to account for lower levels of sales is difficult and takes time, thus we may not be able to reduce our costs sufficiently to compensate for a shortfall in net sales, and even a small shortfall in net sales could disproportionately and adversely affect our operating margin and operating results for a given quarter.

Our operating results may also fluctuate due to a variety of other factors, many of which are outside of our control, including the changing and volatile local, national, and international economic environments, any of which may cause our stock price to fluctuate. Besides the other risks in this “Risk Factors” section, factors that may affect our operations include, without limitation:

Each of these factors individually, or the cumulative effect of two or more of these factors, could result in large fluctuations in our quarterly and annual operating results. As a result, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful. You should not rely on our past results as an indication of future performance.

Our products are subject to competition, including competition from the customers to whom we sell.

Servers, computer accelerators, flash storage arrays, PCIe expansion products, and other products that we design, manufacture, and sell or license are subject to competition. The computer hardware and technology fields are well established with limited, and in many cases no, intellectual property and technological barriers to entry. The markets in which we operate are competitive and we expect competition to increase in the future from established competitors and new market entrants.

The markets are influenced by, among others, brand awareness and reputation, price, strength and scale of sales and marketing efforts, professional services and customer support, product features, reliability and performance, scalability of products, and breadth of product offerings. Due to the nature of our products, competition occurs at the design, performance, and sales stages. A design or sales win by us does not limit further competition and our customers may purchase competitive products from third parties at any time. This competition could result in increased pricing pressure, reduced profit margins, increased sales and marketing expenses and failure to increase, or loss of, market share, any of which would likely seriously harm our business, operating results, or financial condition. From a cost and control perspective, our products are specialized and thus generally cost more than our competitors’ products. If our ability to design specialized solutions is deemed to be on par or of lesser value than competing solutions, we could lose our customers and prospects.

Many of our customers and competitors, often with substantially more resources or larger economies of scale, produce products that are competitive with our products. Many of these third parties mass-produce hardware solutions and have not heavily invested in or allocated resources to the smaller scale specialized products and solutions we design. A decrease in the cost of general mass-produced hardware solutions, which can serve as a substitute for our products, or the entrance or additional allocation of resources by one of these customers or competitors into the production of specialized systems which compete with our products could create increased pricing pressure, reduced profit margins, increased sales and marketing expenses, or the loss of market share or expected market share, any of which may significantly harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

New entrants and the introduction of other distribution models in our markets may harm our competitive position.

The markets for development, distribution, and sale of our high-performance computing solutions are rapidly evolving. New entrants seeking to gain market share by introducing new technology, new products and new server configurations may make it more difficult for us to sell our products and earn design wins, which could create increased pricing pressure, reduced profit margins, increased sales and marketing expenses, or the loss of market share or expected market share, any of which may significantly harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

Large computer hardware and equipment manufacturers and suppliers have traditionally designed, produced, and sold general purpose servers, and storage arrays and related products and equipment. Our customers supplement these general-purpose systems by purchasing our specialized or customized systems or supplemental products, which improve the speed, efficiency, or performance of such systems. If the speed, efficiency, or computational power of such general purpose systems increases such that supplemental or specialized products become unnecessary, or the cost of such general purpose systems declines such that it is more cost effective for prospective customers to add general-purpose equipment rather than specialized or supplemental equipment, we could experience a significant decline in demand for the products which may significantly harm to our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our products compete with and supplement general purpose servers, storage systems and related equipment. If the producers of general-purpose equipment implement proprietary standards, software, interfaces, or other interoperability restrictions, including controls which restrict the equipment’s compatibility with third party systems, we could experience a significant decline in sales because our products would not be interoperable with such systems, resulting in significant harm to our business, operating results and financial condition.

In our marketplace, general-purpose equipment is traditionally mass-produced and available to order, while specialized equipment and custom bulk-order equipment is subject to a bid-based purchase system. If one or more large manufacturers of general or standard server storage arrays, or related products and equipment, provide specialized, customized, or supplementary equipment on a made-to-order or generally available basis, we could be forced to reduce our prices or change our selling model to remain competitive, which would significantly harm to our business, operating results and financial condition.

Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents, as well as other significant disruptions of our information technology networks and related systems and resources, could adversely affect our business, disrupt operations and expose us to liabilities to employees, customers, governmental regulators, and other third parties.

We use information technology and other computer resources to carry out important operational activities and to maintain our business records. As part of our normal business activities, we permit certain employees to perform some or all of their business activities remotely, we collect and store certain personal identifying and/or confidential information relating to our employees, customers, vendors and suppliers, and we maintain operational and financial information related to our business. Furthermore, we rely on products and services provided by third-party suppliers to operate certain critical business systems, including without limitation, cloud-based infrastructure, encryption and authentication technology, email, and other functions, which exposes us to supply-chain attacks or other business disruptions.

Our systems are often deployed in environments supporting AI workloads and large-scale data processing. Unathorized access to such systems could expose sensitive operational or training data belonging to our customers.

We face risks associated with security breaches through cyber-attacks or cyber-intrusions, malware, computer viruses and malicious codes, ransomware, attachments to e-mail, unauthorized access attempts, denial of service attacks, phishing, social engineering, persons with access to systems inside our organization, and other significant disruptions of our information technology networks and related systems. The risk of a security breach has generally increased as the frequency, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques, tools and tactics used in such attempted security breaches evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed to not be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. Accordingly, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers, disaster recovery or other preventative or corrective measures, and thus it is impossible for us to entirely counteract this risk or fully mitigate the harms after such an attack.

We have implemented certain systems and processes intended to address ongoing and evolving cybersecurity risks, secure our information technology, applications and computer systems, and prevent unauthorized access to or loss of sensitive, confidential and personal data. Our security measures may not be sufficient for all possible situations and may be vulnerable to, among other things, fraud, hacking, employee error, system error, and faulty password management.

Our ability to conduct our business may be impaired if our or our services providers’ information technology networks, systems or resources, including our and their websites or e-mail systems, are compromised, degraded, damaged or fail, whether due to a virus or other harmful circumstance, fraud, intentional penetration or disruption of our or their information technology resources by:

A significant and extended disruption could damage our business or reputation and cause, amongst other things, loss of revenue or customer relationships, unintended and/or unauthorized public disclosure or the misappropriation of proprietary, personal identifying and confidential information, and us to incur significant expenses to address and remediate or otherwise resolve these kinds of issues.

The release of confidential information may also lead to litigation or other proceedings against us by affected individuals, business partners and/or regulators, and the outcome of such proceedings, which could include losses, penalties, fines, injunctions, expenses and charges recorded against our earnings and cause us reputational harm and/or could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.

Our business may be impacted by evolving regulations and market developments relating to artificial intelligence.

Our products are frequently deployed in systems used for AI and machine learning applications, including defense, autonomy, and data analytics. The regulatory environment governing AI technologies is evolving rapidly in the United States and internationally. For example, the European Union has adopted the EU Artificial Intelligence Act and other jurisdictions are considering legislation governing the development and deployment of AI systems.

While we do not develop AI models, our products may be incorporated into AI-enabled platforms. Changes in regulatory frameworks, export restrictions, or customer requirements related to AI technologies could impact demand for our products or require modifications to our systems.

Changes in U.S. government priorities and/or delays or reductions in defense spending could negatively impact our financial position, results of operations, liquidity and overall business.

We expect that sales to prime contractors and U.S. governmental entities will constitute an increasingly significant portion of our future sales. We expect that our U.S. government revenues will largely result from contracts awarded under various U.S. government programs, primarily defense-related programs with the DOD, and other departments and agencies. Changes in U.S. government priorities and/or delays or reductions in defense spending for various reasons, including as a result of potential changes in policy, administration, or budgetary positions, priorities, and protracted lead times could negatively impact our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. The sale of our products to such defense customers are subject to U.S. government priorities, policies, budget decisions and appropriation processes, which are driven by numerous factors that are out of our control, including U.S. domestic and broader geopolitical events, macroeconomic conditions, and the ability of the U.S. government to enact relevant legislation.

In recent years, U.S. government appropriations have been affected by larger U.S. government budgetary issues and related legislation, and the U.S. government has been unable to complete its budget process before the end of its fiscal year, resulting in both governmental shutdowns and continuing resolutions providing only enough funds for U.S. government agencies to continue operating at prior-year levels. If appropriations are delayed or a government shutdown were to occur and continue for an extended period of time, we could be at risk of reduced orders, program cancellations and other disruptions and nonpayment. When the U.S. Government operates under a continuing resolution, new contract and program starts are restricted and funding for our programs may be unavailable, reduced or delayed. Additionally, changes in the DOD’s funding priorities also could reduce opportunities in our existing or future programs or initiatives where we have made investments.

Our contracts with the U.S. government are conditioned upon the continuing availability of Congressional appropriations. Congress usually appropriates funds on a fiscal year basis, even though contract performance may extend over many years. Consequently, contracts are sometimes partially funded initially, and additional funds are committed only as Congress makes further appropriations over time. To the extent we incur costs in excess of funds obligated on a contract or in advance of a contract award or contract definitization, we are at risk of not being reimbursed for those costs unless and until additional funds are obligated under the contract or the contract is successfully awarded, definitized and funded, which could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

The current administration has been evaluating government spending and enacting cost reduction policies. The effect of these policies on defense procurement and on the defense programs which the Company is executing or pursuing is uncertain. Changes in priorities or policies, reductions of funding, or a reduction in government personnel could impact our business, results of operations, financial condition, and growth prospects.

As a result of the foregoing, U.S. government defense spending levels are subject to a wide range of outcomes and are difficult to predict beyond the near-term due to numerous factors, including the external threat environment, future governmental priorities and the state of governmental finances. Significant changes in U.S. government defense spending or changes in U.S. government priorities, policies and requirements could have a material adverse effect on our current business strategy and results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

To the extent that we contract with the U.S. Government, we are subject to certain procurement laws and regulations, including those that enable the U.S. Government to terminate contracts for convenience.

To the extent that we contract with the U.S. Government, we must comply with laws and regulations relating to the award, administration and performance of U.S. Government contracts. Government contract laws and regulations affect how we do business with certain of our customers and impose certain risks and costs on our business. A violation of these laws and regulations by us, our employees, others working on our behalf, a supplier or a joint venture partner could harm our reputation and result in the imposition of fines and penalties, the termination of our contracts, suspension or debarment from bidding on or being awarded contracts, loss of our ability to export products or perform services and civil or criminal investigations or proceedings. Also, elements of certain of contracts and/or programs are classified by the U.S. Government, which imposes security requirements that limit our ability to discuss our performance on these contracts and programs, including any specific risks, disputes and claims.

The U.S. Government may terminate any of our government contracts at its convenience or for default based on our performance, either of which could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Generally, prime contractors have similar termination rights under subcontracts related to government contracts. If a contract is terminated for convenience, we generally are protected by provisions covering reimbursement for costs incurred on the contract and profit on those costs. However, to the extent insufficient funds have been appropriated by the U.S. Government to cover our costs upon a termination for convenience, the U.S. Government may assert that it is not required to appropriate additional funding. Additionally, the U.S. Government could terminate a prime contract under which we are a subcontractor, notwithstanding the fact that our performance and/or the quality of the products or services we delivered were consistent with our contractual obligations as a subcontractor.

Changing procurement policies could adversely affect our business and financial results.

The U.S. Government has increasingly relied on competitive contract award types, including indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity and other multi-award contracts, which have the potential to create pricing pressure and to increase our costs by requiring us to submit multiple bids and proposals when targeting them for sales. Multi-award contracts require us to make sustained efforts to obtain task orders under the contract. Additionally, procurements that do not evaluate whether the cost assumptions in the bids are realistic can lead to bidders taking aggressive pricing positions, which could result in the winner realizing a loss upon contract award or an increased risk of lower margins or realizing a loss over the term of the contract. Competitors may be willing to accept more risk or lower profitability in competing for contracts than we are.

U.S. Government procurement policies and procedures, and the application thereof, change on a regular basis and such changes could adversely affect our ability to win new business or maintain or increase profitability. For example, an increase in the use of contract structures that shift risk to the contractor, such as fixed-price development contracts and incentive-based fee arrangements, or the U.S. Government using different award fee criteria than historically used could adversely affect our profits or make it more difficult to win new contracts.

Changes in regulations or interpretations of what constitute allowable costs under our government contracts could adversely impact our profitability, and changes in contract financing policy for fixed-price contracts, such as changes in performance and progress payments policies, could significantly affect the timing of our cash flows.

If we are unable to manage our growth and expand our operations successfully, our business and operating results will be harmed, and our reputation may be damaged.

We have expanded our operations significantly since inception and anticipate that further significant expansion will be required to achieve our business objectives. The growth and expansion of our business and product offerings, as well as the need for innovation in order to maintain our competitive advantage, places a continuous and significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources. Any such future growth or change in focus or strategy would also add complexity to and require effective coordination throughout our organization. To manage any future growth effectively, we must continue to innovate and improve and expand our information technology and financial infrastructure, our operating and administrative systems and controls, and our ability to manage headcount, capital, and processes in an efficient manner. We may not be able to successfully implement improvements to these systems and processes in a timely or efficient manner, which could result in additional operating inefficiencies and could cause our costs to increase more than planned. If we do increase our operating expenses in anticipation of the growth of our business and this growth does not meet our expectations, our operating results may be negatively impacted. If we are unable to manage future expansion, our ability to provide high quality products and services could be harmed, which could damage our reputation and brand, and may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

A limited number of customers represents a significant portion of our sales. If we were to lose any of these customers, our sales could decrease significantly.

In the year ended December 31, 2025, an aggregate of 61% of our total revenues were attributable to our top three customers. In the year ended December 31, 2024, an aggregate of 40% of our total revenues were attributable to our top three customers. Customer concentration figures represent continuing operations and exclude customer activity within discontinued operations.

Loss of significant customers in the future could materially harm the Company’s business, financial position and/or results of operations. In addition, a few products comprise a significant amount of our sales, and the discontinuation, modification, or obsolescence of such products could materially and adversely affect our sales and results of operations.

We rely on a limited number of parts suppliers to support our manufacturing and design processes.

We rely on a limited number of suppliers to provide us with the necessary devices, parts, and systems to allow us to build, design and manufacture our products, and the failure to manage our relationships with these parties successfully, or disruptions to our suppliers’ businesses caused by supply chain constraints, inflation, human capital issues, and/or other factors, could adversely affect our ability to market and sell our products. Particularly, many of our products rely on high-performance processors, GPUs, and other specialized components used in AI workloads. Supply constraings affecting these components, particularly those produced by NVIDIA, AMD, or other semiconductor suppliers, could limit our ability to manufacture and deliver systems designed for AI applications.

In the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, suppliers for which purchases represent greater than 10% of our total parts purchases accounted for approximately 34% and 68%, respectively, of materials purchased. Vendor concentration figures represent continuing operations and exclude vendor purchases within discontinued operations.

Although we do believe we could locate additional suppliers to fulfill our needs in the event that our relationship with these or any of our other suppliers terminated or they are unable to fulfill our manufacturing needs, any significant change in our relationship with these suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition unless and until we are able to find suitable replacements. We make substantially all of our purchases from our contract suppliers on a purchase order basis. Our suppliers are generally not required to supply our raw materials for any specific period or at any specific quantity or price.

Global pandemics or other disasters or public health concerns in regions of the world where we have operations or source material or sell products could result in the disruption of our business. These or any governmental developments or health concerns in countries in which we operate could result in social, economic, or labor instability. Any disruption resulting from these or similar events could cause significant delays in shipments of our products until we are able to resume normalized operations, and this could have a material negative impact on our results of operations and cash flows. Although the COVID 19 pandemic has subsided, we are continuing to experience unavailability of certain products and limited supplies, protracted delivery dates for componentry, increasing product costs, and changes in minimum order quantities to secure product.

Supply chain disruptions could adversely affect our business, disrupt operations, and impact our profitability.

We rely on a global network of suppliers for key components used in our products. These suppliers are subject to quality and performance issues, excess demand, raw materials shortages, and other factors which could impact their ability to supply us with critical components, or could lead to price inflation and extended lead times. Disruptions in availability of these components, increases in lead times, or price increases could negatively impact our ability to deliver products to our customers and could impact our profitability on the products we deliver. Supply chain disruptions could be caused by tariffs and trade policy, global macroeconomic conditions, the global demand for certain materials or components, or other economic, geopolitical, or market dynamics.

In late 2025, a global shortage of certain memory products resulting from datacenter build-out demand led to significant increases in lead times, pricing volatility, and significant price increases. We have worked with our suppliers to secure availability of supply, including through the negotiation of long-term agreements. While we attempt to pass on component cost increases to our customers, our ability to do so is dependent upon many factors, including market conditions for the Company's products.

Our future success depends on our ability to develop and successfully introduce new and enhanced products that meet the needs of our customers.

Our sales depend on our ability to anticipate our existing and prospective customers’ needs and develop products that address those needs. Our future success will depend on our ability to design new products, anticipate technological improvements and enhancements, and to develop products that are competitive in the rapidly changing computer hardware and software industry, and in the edge computing space in particular.

Introduction of new products and product enhancements will require coordination of our efforts with those of our customers, suppliers, and manufacturers to develop products that offer performance features desired by our customers and performance and functionality superior or more cost effective than solutions offered by our competitors. If we fail to coordinate these efforts, develop product enhancements, or introduce new products that meet the needs of our customers as scheduled, our operating results will be materially and adversely affected, and our business and prospects will be harmed. We cannot assure that product introductions will meet our anticipated release schedules or that our products will be competitive in the market. Furthermore, given the rapidly changing nature of the computer equipment market, there can be no assurance our products and technology will not be rendered obsolete by alternative or competing technologies.

Delays in our production cycle could result in outdated equipment or decreased purchases of our products.

The design and manufacture of our products can take several months to several years. The length of such process depends on the complexity and purpose of the system or equipment being designed, and may be affected by factors such as the development and design of unique or specialized systems; the fabrication, availability, and supply of parts; the customization of parts, as applicable; the manufacture and/or assembly of the units, quality control testing; and the development and incorporation of new technologies. If our products are outdated upon completion of this process, our sales could materially decline, and it may be necessary to sell products at a loss.

Unsuccessful government programs or OEM contracts could lead to reduced revenues.

We design and manufacture certain products to fit the specifications of government programs or OEM contracts. These programs may take months or years to complete and involve significant investment of our time, money, and resources. We generally receive upfront fees for these programs, but there is often little or no obligation on the part of our customer to purchase large volumes of products at the time of final product launch. Unsuccessful product launches could lead to reduced revenues and/or potential returns of products, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results. We may be forced to sell products at a loss or spend a significant amount of resources to find additional customers for these products if these programs do not fit the future needs of our intended customers.

Our inventory may rapidly become obsolete.

Sales cycles for some of our products can take several months or longer. In addition, it can take time from the bid to the development and manufacture of the equipment. We maintain inventory based in large part on our forecasts of the volume and timing of orders. The varying length of the sales cycles makes accurate forecasting difficult. The delays inherent in our sales cycles raise the risk that the inventory we have on hand will become obsolete or impaired prior to its use or sale. If our forecasted demand does not materialize into purchase orders, we may be required to write off our inventory balances or reduce the value of our inventory, based on a reduced sales price. A write off of the inventory, or a reduction in the inventory value due to a sales price reduction, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

If our products contain significant defects, we could incur significant expenses to remediate such defects, our reputation could be damaged, and we could lose market share.

Our products are complex and may contain defects or security vulnerabilities, or experience failures or unsatisfactory performance due to any number of issues in design, fabrication, packaging, materials and/or use within a system. These risks may increase as our products are introduced into new devices, markets, technologies and applications, or as new versions are released. Some errors in our products or services may only be discovered after a product or service has been shipped or used by customers or the end users of such product. Undiscovered vulnerabilities in our products or services could expose our customers or end users, including the U.S. Government and military, to hackers or other unscrupulous third parties who develop and deploy viruses, worms and other malicious software programs that could attack our products or services. Failure of our products to perform to specifications, or other product defects, could lead to substantial damage to the products we sell directly to customers, the end product in which our device has been integrated by OEMs and to the user of such end product. Any such defect may cause us to incur significant warranty, support and repair or replacement costs, write off the value of related inventory, cause us to lose customers and/or market share, and divert the attention of our personnel from our product development efforts to find and correct the issue. In addition, an error or defect in new products or releases or related software drivers after commencement of commercial shipments could result in failure to achieve market acceptance or loss of design wins, harm our relationships with customers and partners and harm consumers’ perceptions of our brand. Also, we may be required to reimburse our customers, partners or consumers, including costs to repair or replace products in the field. A product recall, including a recall due to a bug in our products, or a significant number of product returns could be expensive, damage our reputation, harm our ability to attract new customers or maintain our current customers, result in the shifting of business to our competitors and/or result in litigation against us, such as product liability suits.

If a product liability claim is brought against us, the cost of defending the claim could be significant and would divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, and harm our business. Further, our business liability insurance may be inadequate or future coverage may be unavailable on acceptable terms, which could adversely impact our financial results.

We offer an extended product warranty to cover defective products at no cost to the customer. An unexpected change in failure rates of our products could have a material adverse impact on our business.

We offer product warranties that generally extend for one or two years from the date of sale that require us to repair or replace defective products returned by the customer during the warranty period at no cost to the customer. Our product warranties are in addition to warranties we receive from our vendors. Existing and future product guarantees and warranties place us at risk of incurring future returns and repair and/or replacement costs.

While we engage in product quality programs and processes, including monitoring and evaluating the quality of our components sourced from our suppliers, our warranty obligation is affected by actual product defect rates, parts and equipment costs and service labor costs incurred in correcting a product defect. We record an estimate for anticipated warranty-related costs based on historical and estimated future product return rates and expected repair or replacement costs. Although such costs have historically been within management’s expectations and our warranty reserves (when coupled with warranty coverage provided by our vendors) have been sufficient to cover such costs, our reserves set aside to cover warranty returns may be inadequate due to an unanticipated number of customer returns, undetected product defects, unanticipated component failures or changes in estimates for material, labor and other costs we may incur to replace projected product defects. As a result, if actual customer returns, product defect rates, parts and equipment costs or service labor costs exceed our estimates, or we experience unexpected changes in failure rates, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to achieve design wins for our products, our business will be harmed.

Achieving design wins is an important success factor for our business. We work closely with OEMs and end users to ensure the customer gets the product they want in the specific configuration, size and weight required for the application. We have participated in many design wins based upon our ability to interpret technical specifications and proceed rapidly through prototyping, development, and delivery. This approach and expertise are two of the factors driving our growth. Failure to maintain our expertise and ability to deliver custom, specific design systems could harm our business. In order to achieve design wins, we must:

Unanticipated changes in industry standards could render our products incompatible with products developed by major hardware manufacturers and software developers. Further, if our products are not in compliance with prevailing industry standards, our customers may not incorporate our products into their design strategies.

If we cannot retain, attract, and motivate key personnel, we may be unable to effectively implement our business plan.

Our success depends in large part upon our ability to retain, attract and motivate highly skilled management, development, marketing, sales, and service personnel. The loss of, and failure to replace, key technical management and personnel could adversely affect multiple development efforts.

We have entered into employment agreements with most of our executive officers, though they may terminate employment with us at any time, for any reason and with no advance notice. We may lose key personnel to other high technology companies or to other larger companies with significantly greater resources than us who may recruit our key personnel. The replacement of members of our senior management team or other key personnel may involve significant time and costs, and the loss of these employees could significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our business objectives.

Recruitment and retention of senior management and skilled technical, sales and other personnel is very competitive, and we may not be successful in either attracting or retaining such personnel. As part of our strategy to attract and retain key personnel, we may offer equity compensation through grants of stock options, restricted stock awards or restricted stock units. Although we may issue equity awards outside of our shareholder approved equity incentive plan to potential employees, they may not perceive our equity incentives as attractive enough. In addition, due to the intense competition for qualified employees, we may be required to, and have had to, increase the level of compensation paid to existing and new employees, which could and has materially increased our operating expenses.

We have made in the past, and may make in the future, acquisitions which could require significant management attention, disrupt our business, result in dilution to our stockholders, deplete our cash reserves and adversely affect our financial results.

Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including, without limitation, the following:

Acquisitions may also cause us to:

Acquisitions of high-technology companies and assets are inherently risky and subject to many factors outside of our control and no assurance can be given that our completed or future acquisitions will be successful and will not materially adversely affect our business, operating results, or financial condition. Failure to manage and successfully integrate acquisitions could materially harm our business and operating results.

The continuing commoditization of HPC hardware and software has resulted in increased pricing pressure and may adversely affect our operating results.

The continuing commoditization of HPC hardware, such as processors, interconnects, flash storage and other infrastructure, and the growing commoditization of software, including plentiful building blocks and more capable open source software, as well as the potential for integration of differentiated technology into already-commoditized components, has resulted in, and may result in increased pricing pressure that may cause us to reduce our pricing in order to remain competitive, which can negatively impact our gross margins and adversely affect our operating results.

Risks Relating to Intellectual Property

If we are unable to protect our proprietary design and intellectual property rights, our competitive position could be harmed, or we could be required to incur significant expenses to enforce our rights.

Our ability to compete effectively is dependent in part upon our ability to protect our proprietary technology, including our proprietary software, designs and know-how. We rely on trademarks, trade secret laws, patents, confidentiality procedures, and licensing arrangements to protect our intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance these protections will be available in all cases or will be adequate to prevent our competitors from copying, reverse engineering or otherwise obtaining and using our technology, proprietary rights or products. For example, the laws of certain countries in which our products are manufactured or licensed do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. In addition, third parties may seek to challenge, invalidate, or circumvent our trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets, or applications for any of the foregoing. There can be no assurance that our competitors will not independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology or design around our proprietary rights. In each case, our ability to compete could be significantly impaired.

To prevent substantial unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights, it may be necessary to prosecute actions for infringement and/or misappropriation of our trade secrets and/or proprietary rights against third parties. Any such action could result in significant costs and diversion of our resources and management’s attention, and there can be no assurance we will be successful in such action. Furthermore, many of our current and potential competitors have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to enforce their intellectual property rights than we do. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating our trade secrets and/or intellectual property.

Many of our proprietary designs are in digital form and the breach of our computer systems could result in these designs being stolen.

If our cybersecurity measures are breached or unauthorized access to private or proprietary data is otherwise obtained, our proprietary designs could be stolen. Because we hold many of these designs in digital form on our servers, there exists an inherent risk that an unauthorized third party could conduct a cybersecurity breach resulting in the theft of our proprietary information. While we have taken steps to protect our proprietary information, because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not identified until they are launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Any or all of these issues could negatively impact our competitive edge and our ability to obtain new customers thereby adversely affecting our financial results.

Our proprietary designs are susceptible to reverse engineering by our competitors.

Much of the value of our proprietary rights is derived from our vast library of design specifications. While we consider our design specifications to be protected by various proprietary, trade secret and intellectual property laws, such information is susceptible to reverse engineering by our competitors. We may not be able to prevent our competitors from developing competing design specifications and the cost of enforcing these rights may be significant. If we are unable to adequately protect our proprietary designs our financial condition and operating results could suffer.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.

We consider trade secrets, including confidential and unpatented know-how and designs, important to the maintenance of our competitive position. We protect trade secrets and confidential and unpatented know-how, in part, by customarily entering into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to such knowledge, such as our employees, outside technical and commercial collaborators, consultants, advisors and other third parties. We also enter into confidentiality and invention or patent assignment agreements with our employees and consultants that obligate them to maintain confidentiality and assign their inventions to us. Despite these efforts, any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose our proprietary information, including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches.

Claims by others that we infringe their intellectual property or trade secret rights could harm our business.

Our industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights, which has resulted in protracted and expensive litigation for many companies. Third parties may in the future assert claims of infringement of intellectual property rights against us or against our customers or channel partners for which we may be liable. As the number of products and competitors in our market increases and overlaps occur, infringement claims may increase.

Intellectual property or trade secret claims against us, and any resulting lawsuits, may result in us incurring significant expenses and could subject us to significant liability for damages and invalidate what we currently believe are our proprietary rights. Our involvement in any patent dispute or other intellectual property dispute or action to protect trade secrets and know-how could have a material adverse effect on our business. Adverse determinations in any litigation could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties, require us to seek licenses from third parties and prevent us from manufacturing and selling our products. Any of these situations could have a material adverse effect on our business. These claims, regardless of their merits or outcome, would likely be time consuming and expensive to resolve and could divert management’s time and attention.

We are generally obligated to indemnify our channel partners and end-customers for certain expenses and liabilities resulting from intellectual property infringement claims regarding our products, which could force us to incur substantial costs.

We have agreed, and expect to continue to agree, to indemnify our channel partners and end-customers for certain intellectual property infringement claims regarding our products. As a result, in the case of infringement claims against these channel partners and end-customers, we could be required to indemnify them for losses resulting from such claims or to refund amounts they have paid to us. Our channel partners and other end-customers in the future may seek indemnification from us in connection with infringement claims brought against them regarding our products. These claims, regardless of their merits or outcome, would likely be time consuming and expensive to resolve, and could divert management’s time and attention from managing our business.

Privacy concerns relating to our products and services could damage our reputation, deter current and potential users from using our products and services, result in liability, or result in legal or regulatory proceedings.

Our products and services may provide us with access to sensitive, confidential, or personal data or information that is subject to privacy and security laws and regulations. Concerns about our practices with regard to the collection, use, retention, security or disclosure of personal information or other privacy-related matters, even if unfounded, could damage our reputation and adversely affect our operating results. The theft, loss, or misuse of personal data collected, used, stored, or transferred by us to run our business or by one of our partners could result in significantly increased security costs, damage to our reputation, regulatory proceedings, disruption of our business activities or increased costs related to defending legal claims.

Worldwide regulatory authorities are considering and have approved various legislative proposals concerning data protection, which continue to evolve and apply to our business. For example, the European Union adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which took effect in May 2018 and requires companies to meet requirements regarding the handling of personal data, including its use, protection, and the ability of persons whose data is stored to correct or delete such data about themselves. Failure to meet GDPR requirements, to the extent applicable, could result in penalties of up to 4% of worldwide revenue. In addition, the interpretation and application of consumer and data protection laws in the United States, Europe and elsewhere are often uncertain and fluid, and may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our data practices. If so, we may be ordered to change our data practices and/or be fined.

In addition, California enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect on January 1, 2020. The CCPA gives California residents expanded rights to access and delete their personal information, opt out of certain personal information sharing, and receive detailed information about how their personal information is used. The CCPA provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that is expected to increase data breach litigation. The CCPA may increase our compliance costs and potential liability. Some observers have noted that the CCPA could mark the beginning of a trend toward more stringent state privacy, data protection, and data security legislation in the U.S., which could increase our potential liability and adversely affect our business. The CCPA was expanded substantially on January 1, 2023, when the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (“CPRA”) became fully operative.

The CPRA, among other things, gives California residents the ability to limit use of certain sensitive personal information, further restricts the use of cross-contextual advertising, establishes restrictions on the retention of personal information, expands the types of data breaches subject to the CCPA’s private right of action, provides for increased penalties for CPRA violations concerning California residents under the age of 16, and establishes a new California Privacy Protection Agency to implement and enforce the new law.

Complying with these changing laws could cause us to incur substantial costs, which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Further, failure to comply with existing or new rules may result in significant penalties or orders to stop the alleged noncompliant activity.

Risks Related to Our International Operations

Our international sales and operations subject us to additional risks that can adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

We sell our products in a number of international jurisdictions. Additionally, our supply chain includes a number of international vendors. Our international operations subject us to a variety of risks and challenges, including, without limitation, exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; inflationary pressures and the possibility of recession; increased management, travel, infrastructure and legal compliance costs associated with having international operations; reliance on channel partners; compliance with foreign laws and regulations, which are subject to change; compliance with U.S. laws and regulations for foreign operations; conflicts between U.S. laws and regulations and foreign laws and regulations; import and export licensing requirements; and reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries and practical difficulties of enforcing rights abroad. Inflation, volatility, recessionary risk, and regulatory and legal compliance risks in any of the countries that we operate or sell our products in could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We are subject to governmental export and import controls that could impair our ability to compete in international markets due to licensing requirements and subject us to liability if we are not in compliance with applicable laws.

Our products are subject to export control and import laws and regulations, including the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, U.S. Customs regulations and various economic and trade sanctions regulations administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Controls. Exports of our products must be made in compliance with these laws and regulations. Certain of our high-performance computing systems may incorporate advanced processors or accelerators that are subject to U.S. export controls related to advanced computing technologies and AI. Changes in export regulations or restrictions on the shipment of such components could affect our ability to sell systems into certain markets. If we violate these laws and regulations, we and certain of our employees, could be subject to substantial civil or criminal penalties, including the possible loss of export or import privileges, fines, which may be imposed on us and responsible employees or managers and, in extreme cases, the incarceration of responsible employees or managers. In addition, if our channel partners, agents, or consultants fail to obtain appropriate import, export or re-export licenses or authorizations, we may also be adversely affected through reputational harm and penalties. Obtaining the necessary authorizations, including any required license, for a particular sale may be time-consuming, is not guaranteed and may result in the delay or loss of sales opportunities. Changes in our products or changes in applicable export or import laws and regulations may also create delays in the introduction and sale of our products in international markets, prevent our end-customers with international operations from deploying our products or, in some cases, prevent the export or import of our products to certain countries, governments or persons altogether. Any change in export or import laws and regulations, shift in the enforcement or scope of existing laws and regulations, or change in the countries, governments, persons or technologies targeted by such laws and regulations, could also result in decreased use of our products, or in our decreased ability to export or sell our products to existing or potential end-customers with international operations. Any decreased use of our products or limitation on our ability to export or sell our products would likely adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

New regulations or standards or changes in existing regulations or standards in the United States or internationally related to our suppliers’ products may result in unanticipated costs or liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and future sales, and could place additional burdens on the operations of our business.

Our suppliers’ products are subject to governmental regulations in many jurisdictions. To achieve and maintain market acceptance, our suppliers’ products must continue to comply with these regulations and many industry standards. As these regulations and standards evolve, and if new regulations or standards are implemented, our suppliers may have to modify their products. The failure of their products to comply, or delays in compliance, with the existing and evolving industry regulations and standards could prevent or delay introduction of our products, which could harm our business.

Supplier uncertainty regarding future policies may also affect demand for HPC products, including our products. Moreover, channel partners or customers may require us, or we may otherwise deem it necessary or advisable, to alter our products to address actual or anticipated changes in the regulatory environment. Our inability to alter our products to address these requirements and any regulatory changes may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-bribery laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Practices in the local business communities of many countries outside the United States have a level of government corruption that is greater than that found in the developed world. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws and we have established policies and procedures designed to monitor compliance with these anti-bribery law requirements; however, we cannot assure that our policies and procedures will protect us from potential reckless or criminal acts committed by individual employees or agents. If we are found to be liable for anti-bribery law violations, we could suffer from criminal or civil penalties or other sanctions that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Risks Related to Our Securities

The price of our common stock may be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

The trading price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially. The trading price of our common stock will depend on several factors, including those described in this “Risk Factors” section, many of which are beyond our control and may not be related to our operating performance. These fluctuations could cause you to lose all or part of your investment in our securities if you are unable to sell them at or above the price you paid. Factors that could cause fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock include, amongst other things:

In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for technology companies in particular, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the relevant companies. Broad market and industry factors, as well as general economic, political and market conditions, such as recessions or interest rate changes, may seriously affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market prices of particular companies’ securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. Litigation of this type, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources. Any adverse determination in any such litigation or any amounts paid to settle any such actual or threatened litigation could require that we make significant payments.

Our directors and principal stockholders own a percentage of our stock and will be able to influence matters subject to stockholder approval.

Our directors, executive officers and significant stockholders influence the Company and could delay or prevent a change in corporate control. Our directors, executive officers, and holders of more than 5% of our common stock, together with their affiliates, beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately 12% of our outstanding common stock, based on the number of shares outstanding as of March 5, 2026. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, would have the ability to exert influence over the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, these stockholders, acting together, would have the ability to exert influence over the management and affairs of the Company. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership might adversely affect the market price of our common stock by:

If securities or industry analysts issue an adverse opinion regarding our securities or do not publish research or reports about our Company, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that equity research analysts publish about us and our business. We have no control over such analysts or the content and opinions in their reports. Securities analysts may elect not to provide research coverage of our Company and such lack of research coverage may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. The price of our common stock could also decline if one or more equity research analysts downgrade our common stock or if those analysts issue other unfavorable commentary or cease publishing reports about us or our business. If one or more equity research analysts cease coverage of our Company, we could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.

Substantial future equity issuances and/or sales of shares of our common stock could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

The market price of shares of our common stock could decline as a result of substantial equity issuances and/or sales of our common stock, particularly sales by our directors, executive officers and significant stockholders, a large number of shares of our common stock becoming available for sale, or the perception in the market that holders of a large number of shares intend to sell their shares. As of March 5, 2026, we had 24,737,191 shares of our common stock outstanding. We may issue or sell a significant number of shares of our common stock or other securities to raise capital in the future or in connection with a strategic transaction, which would result in significant dilution to our current shareholders.

Additionally, historically, a significant portion of the compensation that we pay to our executive officers, employees and directors has been in the form of equity awards. We believe that this structure incentivizes such individuals to both join and remain with the Company, and also serves to further the growth, development and financial success of the Company by providing a means by which such persons can personally benefit through the ownership of capital stock of the Company. However, the issuance of securities to our executive officers, employees and directors also results in dilution to our current shareholders, and substantial sales of such securities could cause the market price of our securities to decline and/or could depress the growth of the market price of our securities.

We have the right to designate and issue shares of preferred stock. If we were to designate and/or issue additional preferred stock, it is likely to have rights, preferences and privileges that may adversely affect the common stock.

We are authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of blank-check preferred stock, with such rights, preferences and privileges as may be determined from time to time by our board of directors. Our board of directors is empowered, without stockholder approval, to issue preferred stock in one or more series, and to fix for any series the dividend rights, dissolution or liquidation preferences, redemption prices, conversion rights, voting rights, and other rights, preferences, and privileges for the preferred stock. Currently, we do not have any series of preferred stock designated or shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

The issuance of shares of preferred stock, depending on the rights, preferences, and privileges attributable to the preferred stock, could reduce the voting rights and powers of the common stock and the portion of our assets allocated for distribution to common stockholders in a liquidation event, and could also result in dilution in the book value per share of the common stock. The preferred stock could also be utilized, under certain circumstances, as a method for raising additional capital or discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company, to the detriment of the investors in the common stock offered hereby. We cannot assure that we will not, under certain circumstances, issue shares of our preferred stock.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of the Company, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management and limit the market price of our common stock.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. Some of these provisions:

In addition, we are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which limits the ability of stockholders owning in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock to merge or combine with us. Furthermore, our certificate of incorporation specifies that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for most legal actions involving actions brought against us by stockholders. We believe this provision benefits us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law by chancellors particularly experienced in resolving corporate disputes, efficient administration of cases on a more expedited schedule relative to other forums and protection against the burdens of multi-forum litigation. However, the provision may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against our directors and officers. The enforceability of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies’ certificates of incorporation has been challenged in legal proceedings, and it is possible that, in connection with any applicable action brought against us, a court could find the choice of forum provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in such action.

These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions in our certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws make it more difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to obtain control of our board of directors or initiate actions that are opposed by the then-current board of directors and could also delay or impede a merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving our Company. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing or cause us to take other corporate actions you desire. Any delay or prevention of a change of control transaction or changes in our board of directors could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Our inability to raise additional capital on acceptable terms in the future may limit our ability to develop and commercialize new solutions and technologies and expand our operations.

If our available cash balances and anticipated cash flow from operations are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, due to lower demand for our products as a result of other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section, we may seek to raise additional capital through equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations or licensing arrangements. We may also consider raising additional capital in the future to expand our business, pursue strategic investments, take advantage of financing opportunities, or other reasons.

Additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. If we raise funds by issuing equity securities, dilution to our stockholders could result. Any equity securities issued also may provide for rights, preferences, or privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock. The terms of debt securities issued, or borrowings, could impose significant restrictions on our operations. The incurrence of indebtedness or the issuance of certain equity securities could result in increased fixed payment obligations and could also result in restrictive covenants, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt or issue additional equity, limitations on our ability to acquire or license intellectual property rights, and other operating restrictions that could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business. In addition, the issuance of additional equity securities by us, or the possibility of such issuance, may cause the market price of our common stock to decline. If we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements with third parties, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to our technologies or our products, or to grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. If we are unable to raise adequate funds, we may have to liquidate some or all of our assets, or delay or reduce the scope of our development programs. We also may have to reduce marketing, customer support or other resources devoted to our products or cease operations. Any of these actions could harm our business, operating results, and financial condition.

We have never paid, and do not expect to pay, any cash dividends to holders of our common stock for the foreseeable future.

We have never paid, and do not expect to pay, cash dividends to holders of our common stock at any time in the foreseeable future. Anyone considering investing in shares of our common stock should not rely on such investment to provide dividend income. Instead, we plan to retain any earnings to establish, maintain and expand our operations and product offerings. In addition, any future debt financing arrangement may contain terms prohibiting or limiting the amount of dividends that may be declared or paid on our stock. Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their shares of common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any return on their investment.

We are a “smaller reporting company,” and the reduced public company reporting and disclosure requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies may make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We currently qualify as a “smaller reporting company,” as defined in the Exchange Act. For as long as we continue to be a smaller reporting company, we may choose to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements or scaled disclosure requirements applicable to other public companies but not to smaller reporting companies, which includes, among other things:

We will continue to be a “smaller reporting company” if, as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, (i) our public float is less than $250 million, or (ii) our annual revenues for the most recently completed fiscal year are less than $100 million and we either have no public float or a public float of less than $700 million.

As a result of the foregoing, the information we provide may be different than the information that is available with respect to other public companies. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive if we rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

The Company leases its offices, manufacturing, and warehouse facility in San Diego County under a non-cancelable operating lease that expires in August 2030. This approximately 29,342 square foot space in Escondido, California houses our headquarters. The Company also leases a facility in Salt Lake City, Utah that houses our Ion software development team. This lease expired on June 30, 2025, and the Company extended the lease for an additional 12 months, with the lease commencing in July 2025 and expiring in June 2026. In the lease extension, the leased space was reduced from 3,208 square feet to 925 square feet. Additionally, we leased a 1,632 square foot facility located in Anaheim, California. This lease expired on July 31, 2025, and the Company extended the lease through January 31, 2026. Upon expiration of the lease on January 31, 2026, the Company did not renew the lease and vacated the facility.

The Bressner business, which has been classified as discontinued operations and was sold on December 30, 2025, leased an 11,836 square foot space in Germany on a month-to-month basis. In June 2024, Bressner leased an additional 2,500 square feet of office space in Germany on a month-to-month basis with payments of approximately $5,950 per month, beginning in October 2024. In May 2025, Bressner entered into a lease agreement for approximately 15,629 square feet of office and warehouse space in Germany, with an initial lease term ending on June 30, 2030. The lease has an option to renew for an additional five-year term that the Company was reasonably certain to exercise. Upon transition of operations into the new facility in December 2025, the month-to-month lease on the other facility was discontinued. All lease commitments related to the Bressner business transferred to the buyer upon sale of the business on December 30, 2025 and are no longer an obligation of the Company.

We believe our existing facilities and equipment are in good operating condition and are suitable for the conduct of our business.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are subject to litigation, claims, investigations, and audits arising from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. See footnote No. 12 “Commitments and Contingencies” in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not Applicable

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information

Our common stock, par value $0.0001, per share is publicly traded on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “OSS”. Below is our quarterly information with respect to the high and low closing sale prices for our common stock for such time periods.

Holders

As of March 5, 2026, there were 24,737,191 shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 5,800 holders of record of our common stock. This number was derived from our stockholder records and does not include beneficial holders of our common stock whose shares are held in “street name” with various dealers, clearing agencies, banks, brokers, and other fiduciaries.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We may enter into credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements in the future that will restrict our ability to declare or pay cash dividends on our common stock. Any future determination to declare dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, general business conditions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

See Part III, Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

During the year ended December 31, 2025, there were no unregistered sales of our securities that were not reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K or our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities

None.

ITEM 6. [RESERVED].

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and operating results together with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion and analysis contain forward-looking statements based upon current beliefs, plans and expectations that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” or in other parts of this Annual Report.

Overview

The Company designs, manufactures, and markets specialized enterprise class high-performance compute, high speed switch fabrics, and storage hardware and software, which are designed to target edge applications for AI/ML, sensor processing, sensor fusion, and autonomy. Edge computing is a form of computing that is done on platform or on site, connected with the data source or the user, rather than in the cloud, minimizing the need for data to be processed remotely. This growing trend increases computing performance and security, as the data does not have to travel to distant datacenter locations. Edge computing is most recognizable in applications such as sensor processing, sensor fusion, autonomy, and AI/ML. To meet the demands at the edge, we offer specialized products and system solutions that consist of computers, switch fabrics, and storage products that incorporate the latest state-of-the art components with embedded proprietary software. Such products and systems allow us to offer high-end solutions to be integrated into edge platforms in our target markets.

The global increase in load on cloud infrastructure and increase in AI applications are the primary factors driving the growth of the edge computing market. We market our products to manufacturers of automated equipment used for medical, industrial, and military applications. Our customer applications often require connection to a wide array of data sources and sensors, ultra-fast processing power, and the ability to quickly access and store large and ever-growing data sets at their physical location (rather than in the cloud). This equipment requires datacenter class performance optimized for deployment at the edge in challenging environments. Many of these edge applications have unique requirements, including special and compact form factors ruggedized for harsh conditions, which cannot be accommodated by traditional controlled air-conditioned datacenters.

We believe that we are uniquely positioned as a specialized provider to address the needs of this market, providing custom servers, data acquisition platforms, compute accelerators, solid-state storage arrays, and system I/O expansion systems. Our systems also offer industry leading capabilities that occupy less physical space and require less power consumption. We deliver this high-end technology to our customers through the sale of equipment and embedded software.

Recent Developments

Sale of Bressner Technology GmbH

On December 30, 2025, the Company signed and closed a Shares Purchsase Agreement (“SPA”) pursuant to which the Company sold 100% of the issued and outstanding limited liability company interests of OSS GmbH, the sole owner of Bressner GmbH, to Hiper Euro GmbH (“Buyer”). The consummation of this transaction represented a strategic shift and prioritization of the Company's core business developing and manufacturing deployable edge computing systems for mission critical applications. At closing, the Company recognized a gain of $6,707,021.This gain is net of transaction costs that were determined to be directly attributable to the sale transaction. The base purchase price and associated gain is subject to adjustment for (i) a comparison of actual closing net working capital to a target amount, (ii) closing cash relative to a minimum cash amount (iii) closing indebtedness and (iv) seller transaction expenses. The Buyer is required to deliver a closing statement within 90 days following the closing. Any disputes regarding the adjustment are subject to resolution by an independent accounting firm. Any amounts payable to the Buyer will be satisfied first from the escrow account, with any remaining escrow balance released to the Company following final determination of the adjustment. All operations, assets, and liabilities of the divested business - including the gain recognized on the sale - have been classified as discontinued operations.

Registered Direct Offering of Common Stock

On September 29, 2025, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with institutional investors (the “Investors”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell to the Investors in a registered direct offering (the “Offering”) 2,500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Common Stock”), par value $0.0001 per share. The Common Stock was sold pursuant to a prospectus supplement, filed on October 1, 2025 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3, originally filed on August 18, 2023 with the SEC (File No. 333-274073), and declared effective by the SEC on August 25, 2023. Net proceeds of the offering were $11,565,146, which is comprised of gross proceeds of $12,500,000 less Offering expenses of $934,854. The Offering closed on October 1, 2025.

Management and Board Changes

During 2025, the composition of the Company's Board of Directors changed. On April 12, 2025, Ms. Gioia Messinger notified the board of directors of her resignation from and decision to not stand for re-election for the board of directors, effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting on May 14, 2025 ("2025 Annual Meeting"). Her decision to resign from the board of directors was not related to any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to its operations, policies, or practices.

On April 16, 2025, Mr. Joe Manko submitted a letter to the board of directors, resigning from the board of directors, effective April 16, 2025. In the resignation letter, Mr. Manko cited certain disagreements with the Company's governance practices and the composition and leadership of the board.

On May 7, 2025, Mr. Ken Potashner notified the board of directors of his intent to not stand for re-election to the board of directors. He continued to serve until the end of his term at the 2025 Annual Meeting. Mr. Potashner's decision to not stand for re-election was not the result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company's operations, policies, or practices.

At the 2025 Annual Meeting, the Company's stockholders elected Mitch Herbets, Mike Dumont, Greg Matz, David Bassett, and Mike Knowles to serve on the board of directors.

Following these changes, the Board continues to focus on governance practices, strategic oversight, and alignment with stockholder interests.

Other Changes and Developments

In August 2024, the Company amended its bylaws to provide that, although directors shall be elected by a plurality of votes cast at a meeting of stockholders of the Company, in an uncontested election of directors, any director nominee who receives a greater number of votes "against” than votes "for” (excluding abstentions) his or her election must promptly tender his or her resignation. Following receipt of such resignation, the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee of the Company's Board of Directors will consider the resignation and recommend to the Board whether to accept such tendered resignation. Except in special circumstances, the Committee will be expected to accept and recommend acceptance of the resignation by the Board. The Board shall make a decision with respect to whether to accept or reject the director’s resignation within 90 days following the applicable meeting of stockholders, which decision, once made by the Board, shall promptly be disclosed via a press release.

On March 13, 2025, the board of directors adopted the Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (the "Amended and Restated Bylaws"). The Amended and Restate Bylaws (1) consolidate the amendments to the first amended and restate bylaws (the "Previous Bylaws") dated April 7, 2023 and August 9, 2024; and (ii) the first sentence of Section 2.8 was amended and restated to read:

"Unless otherwise provided by law, the certificate of incorporation or these bylaws, the holders of the majority of the voting power of the capital stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote, present in person, or by remote communication, if applicable, or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at all meetings of the stockholders."

A copy of the Amended and Restated Bylaws is filed as Exhibit 3.1, which is incorporated by reference.

Components of Results of Operations

Revenue

The Company recognizes revenue under accounting standard ASC 606. Revenue is primarily generated from the sale of computer hardware and engineering services, and, to a minimal extent, revenue is also generated from the sale of software and sales of software maintenance and support contracts. The Company’s performance obligations are satisfied over time as work is performed or at a specific point in time. The majority of the Company’s revenue is recognized at that point in time when products ship and control is deemed to be transferred to the customer. The Company determines revenue recognition through the following steps: (1) identification of the contract with a customer; (2) identification of the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determination of the transaction price; (4) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognition of revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied.

Cost of revenue

Cost of revenue primarily consists of costs of materials, costs paid to third-party contract manufacturers (which may include the costs of components), and personnel costs associated with manufacturing and support operations. Personnel costs consist of wages, bonuses, benefits, and stock-based compensation expenses. Cost of revenue also includes freight, allocated overhead costs and inventory write-offs and changes to our inventory and warranty reserves. Allocated overhead costs consist of certain facilities and utility costs.

Operating expenses

Our operating expenses consist of general and administrative, sales and marketing, and research and development expenses. Salaries and personnel-related costs, benefits, and stock-based compensation expense are the most significant components of each category of operating expenses. Operating expenses also include allocated overhead costs for facilities and utility costs.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expense consists primarily of employee compensation and related expenses for administrative functions including finance, legal, human resources, and fees for third-party professional services, as well as certain overhead expenses which are allocated to general and administrative expense. We expect our general and administrative expense to increase in absolute dollars as we continue to invest in growing the business.

Marketing and Selling

Marketing and Selling expense consists primarily of employee compensation and related expenses for marketing and sales functions, sales commissions, marketing programs, travel, and entertainment expenses, as well as certain overhead expenses which are allocated to marketing and selling expense. Marketing programs consist of advertising, tradeshows, events, corporate communications, and brand-building activities. We expect marketing and selling expenses to increase in absolute dollars as we expand our sales force, increase marketing resources, and further develop sales channels.

Research and Development

Research and development expense consists primarily of employee compensation and related expenses for research and development functions, certain prototype expenses, depreciation associated with assets acquired for research and development, third-party engineering and contractor support costs, as well as certain overhead expenses which are allocated to research and development expense. We expect variability in our research and development expenses due to the timing of new product development and introductions.

Other Income (Expense), net

Other income consists of miscellaneous income and income received for activities outside of our core business. Other expense includes expenses for activities outside of our core business.

Provision for Income Taxes

Provision for income taxes consists of estimated income taxes due to the United States and foreign governments, as well as state tax authorities in jurisdictions in which we conduct business, along with the change in our deferred income tax assets and liabilities.

Income from discontinued operations

Income from discontinued operations consists of income from our Bressner Technologies subsidiary, which was sold on December 30, 2025. Income from discontinued operations also includes the gain recognized on the sale.

Results of Operations

The following tables set forth our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, presented in dollars and as a percentage of revenue.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 from Continuing Operations:

Revenue

For the year ended December 31, 2025, our revenue increased $7,656,691, or 31.2%, as compared to the same period in 2024. This increase is primarily attributable to: 1) higher sales to the US Navy and a defense prime customer of data storage products to support the P-8A Poseidon Reconnaissance Aircraft; 2) higher sales to a defense end customer of custom server products, PCIe accelerators, and expansion products for a classified mobile intelligence platform; and 3) higher sales to a medical imaging OEM of liquid-cooled server products to support a breast cancer screening application. These increases were partially offset by lower sales to commercial aerospace customers as compared to the prior year.

Gross Profit and Gross Margin

Gross profit increased $15,359,559 for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the same period in 2024. Gross margin percentage was 49.6% for 2025, compared to 2.5% for 2024. The improvement in gross margin was driven by 1) a more favorable mix of products shipped within 2025 and favorable pricing on new contracts entered into during 2025; 2) the non-recurrence of $7,088,114 of inventory adjustments and allowances recognized in 2024; 3) the non-recurrence of a $1,222,085 contract loss provision recognized in 2024 related to a customer-funded development contract entered into in 2022; and 3) more favorable manufacturing absorption within 2025 due to both production headcount reductions and a higher volume of production revenue.

Operating expenses

General and administrative expense

General and administrative expense increased $153,729, or 2.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024. This increase was primarily attributable to higher incentive compensation expense, partially offset by a reduction in board compensation associated with the reduction in the size of the board.

General and administrative expense decreased as a percentage of revenue to 22.8% in 2025, as compared to 29.3% in 2024.

Marketing and selling expense

Marketing and selling expense increased $949,997, or 16.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024. The increase was primarily attributable to higher incentive compensation expense, as well as higher salary and contract labor expenses. Marketing and selling expense decreased as a percentage of revenue to 20.4% in 2025, as compared to 22.9% in 2024.

Research and development expense

Research and development expense increased $1,971,460, or 56.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024. The increase was primarily attributable to higher engineering labor costs to support targeted investments in new product development, including costs associated with the development of our PCIe Gen 6.0 offerings, the expansion and enhancement of our U-BMC offerings, and the development of other proprietary products. Research and development expense as a percentage of revenue increased to 16.9% for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to 14.1% for the same period in 2024.

Interest income

Interest income decreased $198,957 for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024. The decrease is primarily attributable to lower investment balances throughout the year.

Interest expense

Interest expense decreased $1,504 for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024. This was primarily due to interest expense related to taxes due in 2024 that did not recur in 2025, partially offset by interest expense incurred from borrowings on the domestic line of credit in 2025.

Other income (expense), net

Other income (expense), for the year ended December 31, 2025, resulted in net other income of $16,309, as compared to net other income of $24,040 in the same period in 2024, for a net decrease of $7,731. The decrease was primarily driven by lower credit card rebates associated with certain rewards programs.

Provision for income taxes

The tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2025 associated with continuing operations was $11,310, compared to $2,560 for the same period in the prior year. The effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 differed from the statutory rate mainly due to changes in the valuation allowance, deductions related to expenses of OSS stock options, research and development credits, and changes in reserves for uncertain tax positions, as well as projecting federal and state tax liabilities.

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, was $8,185,542 for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $1,533,954 for the same period in 2024. The increase of $6,651,588 was primarily due to a $6,707,021 pre-tax gain on sale associated with the divestiture of the Bressner business.

Liquidity and capital resources

Historically, our primary sources of liquidity have been provided by public and private offerings of our securities and revenues generated from our business operations. In 2025, we also received cash from the sale of our Bressner subsidiary. As of December 31, 2025, we had total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash of $33,374,976 and total working capital $45,252,401.

During the year ended December 31, 2025, we had loss from operations related to continuing operations of $3,379,112, with cash used in continuing operating activities of $6,551,087.

During the year ended December 31, 2024, we had a loss from operations related to continuing operations of $15,663,485, with cash used in continuing operating activities of $2,596,232.

Our sources of liquidity and cash flows are used to fund ongoing operations, fund research and development projects for new products technologies, and provide ongoing support services for our customers. Over the next year, we anticipate that we will use our liquidity and cash flows from our operations to fund our business. In addition, as part of our business strategy, we are evaluating potential acquisitions of businesses, products and technologies or other strategic acquisitions. Accordingly, a portion of our available cash may be used at any time for the acquisition of complementary products or businesses. Such potential transactions may require substantial capital resources, which may require us to seek additional debt or equity financing. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully identify suitable acquisition candidates, complete acquisitions, successfully integrate acquired businesses into our current operations, or expand into new markets. Furthermore, we cannot provide assurances that additional financing will be available to us in any required time frame and on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

As discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, there are multiple risks that could result in economic uncertainty and volatility in the capital markets in the near term and could negatively affect our operations. We intend to continue to monitor the effects of inflation, global supply chain shortages, and general economic conditions, and, if appropriate, we may alter our plans to address such concerns as they may arise.

Management’s plans are to focus on acquiring new customer orders, to further grow and expand our business in both commercial and military markets, and to respond to the changing economic landscape by continuing to contlrol hiring and operating costs, conserve cash, and focus on growth and margin expansion. Management is committed to conserving cash and securing debt and/or equity financing, as required, for liquidity to meet our near-term cash requirements.

In April 2022, the Company obtained a domestic revolving line of credit of $2,000,000 at Torrey Pines Bank (the "Line of Credit"). To access the Line of Credit, the Company must maintain a minimum cash balance of $2,500,000 with the bank and maintain a maximum debt to tangible net worth of ratio of 1.00. The Line of Credit is also collateralized by the assets of the Company. The maturity and renewal date for the Line of Credit is September 11, 2026. No balance was outstanding on December 31, 2025 or 2024.

Additionally, in August 2023, we filed a new registration statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-274073) with the SEC, which became effective on August 25, 2023, and allows us to offer and sell up to an aggregate of $100,000,000 of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants to purchase our common stock, preferred stock or debt securities, subscription rights to purchase our common stock, preferred stock or debt securities and/or units consisting of some or all of these securities, in any combination, together or separately, in one or more offerings, in amounts, at prices and on the terms that we will determine at the time of the offering and which will be set forth in a prospectus supplement and any related free writing prospectus. In the event that we need additional financing, we may choose to consummate an offering of our securities under the registration statement on S-3 in order to raise capital.

On September 29, 2025, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain institutional investors, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell to the investors in a registered direct offering 2,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. The common stock was sold pursuant to a prospectus supplement, filed October 1, 2025, supplementing the Registration Statement on Form S-3. Net proceeds of the offering were $11,565,146, which is comprised of gross proceeds of $12,500,000 less Offering expenses of $934,854. The offering closed on October 1, 2025.

Management believes that we have sufficient liquidity to satisfy our anticipated working capital requirements for our ongoing operations and obligations for at least the next twelve months. However, there can be no assurance that management’s efforts will be effective or the forecasted cash flows will be achieved. Furthermore, we will continue to evaluate our capital expenditure needs based upon various factors, including but not limited to, our sales from operations, growth rate, the timing and extent of spending to support development efforts, the expansion of our sales and marketing efforts, the timing of new product introductions, and the continuing market acceptance of our products and services.

If cash generated from operations is insufficient to satisfy our capital requirements, we may borrow up to $2,000,000 from the Line of Credit (subject to satisfaction of certain borrowing conditions). Additionally, we may have to sell additional equity or debt securities, or may obtain expanded credit facilities to fund our operating expenses, pay our obligations, diversify our geographical reach, and grow the Company.

In the event such financing is needed in the future, there can be no assurance that such financing will be available to us, or, if available, that it will be in amounts and on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot raise additional funds when we need or want them, our operations and prospects could be negatively affected. However, if cash flows from operations become insufficient to continue operations at the current level, and if no additional financing were obtained, then management would consider restructuring the Company in a way to preserve its business while maintaining expenses within operating cash flows.

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:

Cash from Continuing Operating Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2025, we used $6,551,087 in cash from continuing operating activities, compared to $2,596,232 in cash used in continuing operating activities in the year ended December 31, 2024.

Net cashed used in continuing operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 was the result of three components: i) net loss from continuing operations of $3,097,848, ii) net adjustments to net loss from continuing operations for non-cash items of $2,505,081, of which the largest components were stock based compensation expense of $1,820,705 and depreciation of $771,552, and iii) a net increase in working capital associated with continuing operations of $5,958,321.

Cash used from net changes in working capital associated with continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $5,958,321, compared to cash provided by net changes in working capital associated with continuing operations of $2,489,623 in 2024. The change in cash from net changes in working capital was primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable associated with ramping revenue, as well as cash disbursements in 2025 related to accrued expenses for a contract loss and for accrued losses related to supplier material received on non-cancellable purchase orders.

Our ability to generate cash from operations in future periods will depend in large part on our profitability, the rate and timing of collections of our accounts receivable, our inventory turns, and our ability to manage other areas of working capital, including accounts payable and accrued expenses.

Cash from Continuing Investing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company generated cash of $3,028,561 from continuing investing activities, as compared to $4,325,278 provided by continuing investing activities during 2024, a net decrease of $1,296,717. This change is attributable to a decrease in the number of short-term investments redeemed in the current year as compared to the prior year and to cash expenditures related to patent filing costs, partially offset by lower capital expenditures for demonstration assets and test equipment.

Cash from Continuing Financing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company generated $11,933,200 of cash from continuing financing activities, as compared to a cash usage of $229,013 from continuing financing activities in 2024. This change was due to i) $11,565,146 of proceeds net of transaction costs from a registered direct offering of common stock completed on October 1, 2025, ii) higher proceeds from the exercise of stock options, due to a higher number of options exercised in 2025, partially offset by iii) higher payments of withholding taxes on stock-based awards.

Cash from Discontinued Operations

Cash provided by discontinued operations was $17,866,932 for the year ended December 31, 2025. This was driven by:

Contractual obligations and commitments

The following table sets forth our non-cancellable contractual obligations as of December 31, 2025:

We have made certain indemnities, under which we may be required to make payments to an indemnified party, in relation to certain transactions. We indemnify our directors, officers, employees, and agents to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware. In connection with our facilities leases, we indemnify our lessors for certain claims arising from the use of our facilities. The duration of the indemnities varies, and in many cases is indefinite. These indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments we could be obligated to make. Historically, we have not been obligated to make any payments for these obligations and no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities.

Known trends or uncertainties

During fiscal year 2024, we experienced delays in funding for customer projects, delays in delivery schedules based upon customer requirements, and an extended sales cycle. If such delays recur in the future, our operating results could be impacted.

With our shifted focus to the development and sale of edge computing products, we have significantly increased our efforts to penetrate the military and defense sectors in particular. These sectors typically have protracted sales cycles, significant contracting requirements, and multi-year deliverables. Our pipeline is effected by the procurement habits and timing of the military and defense sector.

Tariffs and the threat of tariffs, ongoing military conflicts, macroeconomic conditions and policy, inflation and the risk of inflation, and uncertainty about the timing and substance of U.S. government budgets and policy actions have contributed to uncertainty and capital markets volatility overall, which could negatively impact our operations.

We have received notifications from certain of our suppliers of extended lead times for certain components used in our products. In late 2025, a global shortage of certain memory products resulting from datacenter build-out demand led to significant increases in lead times, pricing volatility, and significant price increases. We have worked with our suppliers to secure availability of supply, including through the negotiation of long-term agreements. While we attempt to pass on component cost increases to our customers, our ability to do so is dependent upon many factors, including market conditions for the Company's products.

Inflation

We have recently experienced and continue to experience effects from inflation. Although the Company attempts to pass on increases in raw material, labor, energy and fuel-related costs to our customers, the Company’s ability to do so is dependent upon the rate and magnitude of any increase, competitive pressures, and market conditions for the Company’s products. There have been in the past, and may be in the future, periods of time during which increases in these costs cannot be fully recovered. These increasing costs are being aggressively managed by the Company and actions are being taken to minimize the impact to the Company. Inflation affects the Company’s manufacturing costs, distribution costs, and operating expenses.

U.S. Government Budget Environment

In recent years, U.S. government appropriations have been affected by larger U.S. government budgetary issues and related legislation, and the U.S. government has been unable to complete its budget process before the end of its fiscal year, resulting in both governmental shutdowns and continuing resolutions providing only enough funds for U.S. government agencies to continue operating at prior-year levels. Our business and results of operations could be impacted by future disruptions to U.S. government operations, and these impacts could include delays in contract awards and new program starts. A prolonged shutdown could delay new awards and funding for defense-related projects involving U.S. government agencies and prime contractor customers. These delays could temporarily affect the timing of our revenue recognition, increase our working capital requirements, or reduce near-term liquidity.

Off balance sheet arrangements

Other than lease commitments incurred in the normal course of business and certain indemnification provisions, we do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or liabilities, guarantee contracts, retained or contingent interests in transferred assets, or any obligation arising out of a material variable interest in an unconsolidated entity.

We do not have any majority-owned subsidiaries that are not consolidated in the financial statements. Additionally, we do not have an interest in, or relationships with, any special purpose entities.

Stockholder transactions

See Note 10 to the accompanying financial statements for a discussion regarding our stockholder transactions for the relevant periods.

Critical accounting policies and estimates

In preparing our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management must make a variety of decisions which impact the reported amounts and the related disclosures. These decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. In making these decisions, management applies its judgment based on its understanding and analysis of the relevant circumstances and our historical experience.

Our accounting policies and estimates that are most critical to the presentation of our results of operations and financial condition, and which require the greatest use of judgments and estimates by management, are designated as our critical accounting policies. We periodically re-evaluate and adjust our critical accounting policies as circumstances change.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Company’s performance obligations are satisfied over time as work is performed or at a point in time. The majority of the Company’s revenue is recognized at a point in time when products ship and control is transferred to the customer. The Company determines revenue recognition through the following steps: (i) identification of the contract with a customer; (ii) identification of the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determination of the transaction price; (iv) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognition of revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied.

The Company’s contracts are executed through a combination of written agreements along with purchase orders with all customers including certain general terms and conditions. Generally, purchase orders entail products, quantities and prices, which define the performance obligations of each party and are approved and accepted by the Company.

The Company’s contracts with customers do not include extended payment terms. Payment terms vary by contract type and type of customer and generally range from 30 to 60 days from invoice. Additionally, taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction, which are collected by the Company from a customer and deposited with the relevant government authority, are excluded from revenue.

The transaction price is determined based on the consideration to which the Company will be entitled in exchange for transferring goods or services to the customer adjusted for estimated variable consideration, if any. Variable consideration may include discounts, rights of return, refunds, and other similar obligations. The Company allocates the transaction price to each distinct product and service based on its relative standalone selling price. The standalone selling price for products and services primarily involves the cost to produce the deliverable plus the anticipated margin and is estimated based on the Company’s approved list price.

In the normal course of business, the Company does not accept product returns unless the items are defective as manufactured. The Company establishes provisions for estimated returns and warranties. In addition, the Company does not typically provide customers with the right to a refund and does not transact for noncash consideration.

Revenues on certain fixed-price contracts where we provide engineering services, prototypes and completed products are recognized based upon milestones delivered that are provided during the period and compared to milestone goals to be provided over the entire contract. These services require that we perform significant, extensive, and complex design, development, modification or implementation of our customers’ systems. Performance will often extend over long periods of time, and our right to receive future payment depends on our future performance in accordance with the agreement.

The percentage-of-completion methodology involves recognizing probable and reasonably estimable revenue using the percentage of services completed, on a current cumulative cost to estimated total cost basis, using a reasonably consistent profit margin over the performance period. Due to the long-term nature of these projects, developing the estimates of costs often requires significant judgment. Factors that must be considered in estimating the progress of work completed and ultimate cost of the projects include, but are not limited to, the availability of labor and labor productivity, the nature and complexity of the work to be performed and the impact of delayed performance. If changes occur in delivery, productivity or other factors used in developing the estimates of costs or revenues, we revise our cost and revenue estimates, which may result in increases or decreases in revenues and costs, and such revisions are reflected in earnings in the period in which the revision becomes known.

The Company recognizes contract assets or unbilled receivables related to revenue recognized for services completed but not yet invoiced to the clients. Unbilled receivables are recorded as accounts receivable when the Company has an unconditional right to contract consideration. A contract liability is recognized as deferred revenue when the Company invoices clients in advance of performing the related services under the terms of a contract. Deferred revenue is recognized as revenue when the Company has satisfied the related performance obligation.

On certain contracts with several of the Company’s significant customers, the Company receives payments in advance of manufacturing. Advanced payments are recorded as deferred revenue until the revenue recognition criteria described above has been met. Related billings that are in excess of revenue earned are deferred and recorded as a liability on the consolidated balance sheet until the related services are provided.

Inventory Valuation

We value our inventory at the lower of cost or its estimated net realizable value. We use the average cost method for purposes of determining cost, which approximates the first-in, first-out method. We write down inventory for excess and obsolescence based upon a review of historical usage and assumptions about future demand, product mix and possible alternative uses. Actual demand, product mix and alternative usage may be lower than those that we project, and this difference could have a material adverse effect on our gross margin if inventory write-downs beyond those initially recorded become necessary. Alternatively, if actual demand, product mix and alternative usage are more favorable than those we estimated at the time of such a write-down, our gross margin could be favorably impacted in future periods.

Income Taxes

The determination of income tax expense requires us to make certain estimates and judgments concerning the calculation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, as well as the deductions and credits that are available to reduce taxable income. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our consolidated financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.

In evaluating our ability to recover deferred tax assets, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including our past operating results, our forecast of future earnings, future taxable income, and tax planning strategies. The assumptions utilized in determining future taxable income require significant judgment. We record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. If it becomes more likely than not that a tax asset will be used for which a reserve has been provided, we reverse the related valuation allowance. If our actual future taxable income by tax jurisdiction differs from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

We use a two-step approach to recognize and measure uncertain tax positions. First, the tax position must be evaluated to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination. If the tax position is deemed more-likely-than-not to be sustained, the tax position is then assessed to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The amount of the benefit that may be recognized is the largest amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We reevaluate our uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis and any changes to these positions as a result of tax audits, tax laws or other facts and circumstances could result in additional charges to operations.

Recent accounting pronouncements

Management has evaluated recent accounting pronouncements through the date of the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report and believes that the recent accounting pronouncements as disclosed in Note 2 to the financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report, will not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Interest rate risk

Our exposure to interest rate risk is primarily associated with borrowing on revolving lines of credit. We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowing activities for our variable rate borrowings.

Concentration of credit risk

At times, deposits held with financial institutions may exceed the amount of insurance provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”), of which both provide basic deposit coverage with limits up to $250,000 per owner. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had $33,124,976 of cash in our accounts that exceeded the insurance limits. The Company has not experienced any such losses in these accounts, and believes that the financial institutions at which such amounts are held are stable; however, no assurances can be provided.

We provide credit to our customers in the normal course of business. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and limit the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary.

Foreign currency risk

We operate primarily in the United States. Foreign sales of products and services are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. We have also conducted business outside the United States, primarily through Bressner, our foreign subsidiary in Germany, which was sold on December 30, 2025 and is classified as discontinued operations. Bressner's business was largely transacted in non-U.S. dollar currencies, particularly the Euro, which is subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Accordingly, we have been subject to exposure from changes in the exchange rates of local currencies. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses associated with continuing operations are recorded in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses associated with discontinued operations are recorded in income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in the consolidated statements of operations.

The functional currency for the Bressner business was the Euro. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are remeasured to the functional currency at the average exchange rate in effect during the period. At the end of each reporting period, monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured at historical exchange rates. Consequently, changes in the exchange rates of the currencies may impact the translation of the foreign subsidiaries’ statements of operations into U.S. dollars, which may in turn affect our consolidated statement of operations. The resulting foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated balance sheets. With the divestiture of the Bressner business in 2025, cumulative currency translation adjustments associated with our Bressner business were released from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and recorded within income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes.

Derivative financial instruments

We may employ derivatives to manage certain currency market risks through the use of foreign exchange forward contracts. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. Our derivatives are designated as a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (cash flow hedge). We hedge a portion of the exchange risk involved in anticipation of highly probable foreign currency-denominated transactions. In anticipation of these transactions, we enter into foreign exchange contracts to provide currency at a fixed rate.

Non-GAAP financial measures

Adjusted EBITDA

We believe that the use of adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or adjusted EBITDA, is helpful for an investor to assess the performance of the Company. The Company defines adjusted EBITDA as income (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, acquisition expense, impairment of long-lived assets, financing costs, government funded programs, fair value adjustments from purchase accounting, stock-based compensation expense, and expenses related to discontinued operations.

Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. Because of varying available valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions and the variety of equity instruments that can impact a company’s non-cash operating expenses, we believe that providing a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes non-cash and non-recurring expenses allows for meaningful comparisons between our core business operating results and those of other companies, as well as providing us with an important tool for financial and operational decision making and for evaluating our own core business operating results over different periods of time.

Our adjusted EBITDA measure may not provide information that is directly comparable to that provided by other companies in our industry, as other companies in our industry may calculate non-GAAP financial results differently, particularly related to non-recurring and unusual items. Our adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to operating income or as an indication of operating performance or any other measure of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. We do not consider adjusted EBITDA to be a substitute for, or superior to, the information provided by GAAP financial results.

Adjusted EBITDA associated with our continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 was as follows:

Adjusted EBITDA associated with discontinued operations, excluding the impact of the gain on sale net of transaction costs, for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 was as follows:

Consolidated adjusted EBITDA from continuing and discontinued operations, excluding the impact of the gain of sale net of transaction costs, for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 was as follows:

Adjusted EPS

Adjusted EPS excludes the impact of certain items and, therefore, has not been calculated in accordance with GAAP. We believe that exclusion of certain selected items assists in providing a more complete understanding of our underlying results and trends and allows for comparability with our peer company index and industry. We use this measure along with the corresponding GAAP financial measures to manage our business and to evaluate our performance compared to prior periods and the marketplace. The Company defines non-GAAP income (loss) as income or (loss) before amortization, government funded programs, impairment of long lived assets, stock-based compensation, expenses related to discontinued operations, and acquisition costs. Adjusted EPS expresses adjusted income (loss) on a per share basis using weighted average diluted shares outstanding.

Adjusted EPS is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial information provided in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures may not be computed in the same manner as similarly titled measures used by other companies. We expect to continue to incur expenses similar to the adjusted income from continuing operations and adjusted EPS financial adjustments described above, and investors should not infer from our presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures that these costs are unusual, infrequent or non-recurring.

The following table reconciles loss from continuing operations to adjusted EPS and diluted earnings per share:

The following table reconciles loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes to adjusted EPS and diluted earnings per share, which excludes the impact of the gain on sale net of transaction costs:

The following table reconciles consolidated net income (loss) to adjusted EPS and diluted earnings per share, which excludes the impact of the gain on sale net of transaction costs:

Free Cash Flow

Free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure for reporting cash flow, is defined as cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures for property and equipment, which includes capitalized software development costs. We believe free cash flow provides investors with an important perspective on cash available for investments and acquisitions after making capital investments required to support ongoing business operations and long-term value creation. We believe that trends in our free cash flow can be valuable indicators of our operating performance and liquidity.

Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial information provided in accordance with GAAP. This non-GAAP financial measure may not be computed in the same manner as similarly titled measures used by other companies.

We expect to continue to incur expenditures similar to the free cash flow adjustments described above, and investors should not infer from our presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure that these expenditures reflect all of our obligations which require cash.

The following table reconciles net cash used in continuing operating activities to free cash flow:

The following table reconciles net cash used in discontinued operating activities to free cash flow:

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

See the financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report beginning at page F-1, which are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic and current reports that we file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. In addition, the design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. We have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on our evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2025.

Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm due to an exemption established by the Exchange Act for “smaller reporting companies.”

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no material change in our internal controls over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2025, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s goal is to continue to improve upon our internal control environment as we refine our processes and procedures to address our growing business and operations in other geographies. As we continue to evaluate and take actions to improve our internal control over financial reporting, we may determine to take additional actions to address control deficiencies or determine to modify our plan based upon changes in our internal control environment.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans

During the three months ended December 31, 2025, none of our directors or officers entered into, modified or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” that were intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1, in each case as defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS.

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Executive Officers and Directors

The following table sets forth the names, ages, and positions of our executive officers and directors as of March 5, 2026. There are no arrangements, agreements or understandings between non-management security holders and management under which non-management security holders may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of our affairs. There are no arrangements or understandings between any director and any other person pursuant to which any director or executive officer was or is to be selected as a director or executive officer, as applicable. To the Company’s knowledge, during the last ten years, none of the Company’s officers or directors have been subject to or involved in, as applicable, those types of legal proceedings that are required to be disclose pursuant to Item 4.01(f) of Regulation S-K.

Executive Officers

Mike Knowles has served as our president and chief executive officer since June 2023 and as a director on our board since September 2023. He has more than three decades of leadership experience in global aerospace and defense markets, having led successful business captures resulting in billion-dollar program and product portfolios. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Knowles served as vice president and general manager of C5ISR Systems at Curtiss Wright Defense Solutions from October 2022 to June 2023. Prior to that, from May 2014 to October 2022, Mr. Knowles worked at Cubic Corporation (“Cubic”), where he served in various roles, culminating in his roles as a senior vice president of Cubic and president of Cubic’s Mission and Performance Solutions business, in which role he led a $700 million global business unit with 2,000 employees. While at Cubic, his C5ISR hardware, software and solutions portfolios included rugged networking/computing at the edge, secure and expeditionary communications, intelligence processing, assessment distribution from enterprise-to-edge, high frequency/low SWAP RF components for electronic warfare, space, and 5G applications; and live, virtual, and constructive (LVC) multi-domain training systems. Before Cubic, Mr. Knowles worked at Rockwell Collins from 2004 to 2014 and at Lockheed Martin from 1998 to 2003, both of which are well recognized defense contractors. Prior to that, Mr. Knowles served in the United States Navy for 20 years as a Naval Flight Officer and Aerospace Engineering Duty Officer, with 10 years active duty and 10 years in the Navy Reserves, where he retired as a Commander. He received a BS in Aerospace Engineering from the United States Naval Academy, an MS in Aerospace Engineering from the Naval Postgraduate School, was a graduate of the US Naval Test Pilot School, and received an MBA from George Mason University.

Daniel Gabel has served as our chief financial officer since November 2024. Mr. Gabel has over 15 years of accounting, financial, and strategic leadership within the defense industry. Most recently, Gabel served as the CFO of CAES' Defense System Division, a division of Honeywell that provides advanced electronic solutions to the U.S. aerospace and defense industry. Prior to this, Gabel spent over 10 years at RTX Corporation (Raytheon) across various finance and accounting roles, and within several different divisions, including serving as CFO from 2021 - 2023 of SEAKR Engineering, a Raytheon subsidiary. Gabel has a Master of Business Administration from Southern Methodist University and a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the University of Southern California.

Jim Ison has been with OSS since 2004, and currently serves as the chief product officer. Mr. Ison has nearly three decades of combined sales, product management and marketing management experience in leading-edge large-scale electronic systems using breakthrough technologies. His expertise covers government, communications and HPC markets with particular focus on AI applications in unique environments. Prior to joining OSS, Mr. Ison held senior sales and marketing positions for Ziatech and Rittal. During the 17 years he has served in a management role at OSS, he has led the technological evolution. Mr. Ison holds a bachelor's degree in Aeronautical Engineering from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo and an MBA from the University of Florida.

Board of Directors

Mitchell H. Herbets joined our board of directors in November 2023 where he has served as chairman since May 2025. Mr. Herbets currently serves as non-executive chairman of Thales Defense and Security, a global technology company that provides advanced technology equipment to the U.S. defense, federal and international technology markets. His other current chairman positions include: Safran Federal Systems, a provider of resilient positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) solutions, AI intelligence systems, and custom engineering services to federal agencies, defense organizations and contractors; Photonis Defense, a provider of advanced products in night and digital vision technologies to U.S. and allied governments, and iDirect Government, a provider of tactical satellite communications systems to U.S. Primes for the U.S. Department of Defense. Mr. Herbets previously served on the board of Wireless Telecom Group (WTT), a NYSE American-listed provider of infrastructure for cellular systems, LTE and 5G waveforms, and telecommunications test equipment company before it was acquired by Maury Microwave in 2023. He earlier served as president and CEO of Thales Communications (now Thales Defense and Security), a global leader in tactical radio technology. Prior to being appointed as president and CEO of Thales, he served in a number of senior executive positions at the company, including leadership roles in program management, engineering, and business development. Before Thales, he served four years in the U.S. Army with the final rank of captain. He holds a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Lehigh University, where he currently serves as a member of the advisory council of Lehigh University’s Engineering College. He earned his MBA from George Washington University. Our board of directors believes Mr. Herbets’ significant experience as a senior executive in the defense technology industry, corporate governance experience, organizational leadership skills, and experience serving on the boards of public companies align with the desired skill sets identified by the nominating and governance committee making him well suited to serve as a member of our board of directors. In addition to serving as chairman, Mr. Herbets has played a key role as the chair of the compensation committee. His experience as a CEO has provided valuable insight, consultation, and peer review for the company CEO and CFO in the conduct of business, development of strategy and execution of overall growth strategy plans. He also has helped establish connections with influencers and business opportunities within the defense markets. Lastly, he has provided leadership mentoring for members of the executive staff. The CEO and executive management team look to take advantage of these same contributions going forward.

Greg Matz, CPA, joined our board of directors in July 2020, and is an experienced financial executive, having served in controller, Vice President, and CFO roles for over two decades. Now retired, Mr. Matz is currently serving as a member of the board of directors and audit committee chair for Dare Bioscience, Inc. (NASDAQ: DARE), a public clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. From 2011 to 2016, he worked for The Cooper Companies, Inc. (NYSE: COO), holding roles as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Risk Officer. From 2010 to 2011, Mr. Matz was the Chief Financial Officer for CooperVision, a business unit of The Cooper Companies, Inc. Prior to joining The Cooper Companies, Inc., he held key management roles in finance and marketing at Agilent Technologies and Hewlett Packard. He began his career at KPMG and is a CPA with an active certification. Mr. Matz graduated from the University of San Francisco with a B.S. in Business Administration and completed the University of Pennsylvania, The Wharton School’s Advanced Management Program. Mr. Matz is also a National Association of Corporate Directors (“NACD”) Board Leadership Fellow and has earned the NACD Directorship Certification credential. In addition, Mr. Matz has received a certification from NACD / Carnegie Mellon University in Cybersecurity Oversight. Our Board believes Mr. Matz’s experience as a chief financial officer and chief risk officer of a public company including his corporate experience and skills in financial functions, including planning, reporting, and audit, in risk management , in manging internal growth and acquisitions and in capital markets and corporate strategy qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board and to fill the important role of “audit committee financial expert.”

Michael Dumont joined our board of directors in September 2023 after having served on our board of advisors. He is a retired United States Navy three-star admiral and former senior executive in the U.S. Government with extensive experience in national security, aerospace and defense, risk management, and organizational leadership. During his career in government, Admiral Dumont served in senior leadership roles within the U.S.

Department of Defense, including as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict, Deputy Commander of U.S. Northern Command, and Vice Commander of the North American Aerospace Defense Command. Earlier in his career, he served as a federal prosecutor specializing in white-collar and corporate matters. Admiral Dumont most recently served as a university president and currently advises companies developing artificial intelligence technologies for defense, national security, and public safety applications. He holds a B.A. from the University of Southern Maine, an M.S. from the National War College, and a J.D. from Suffolk University Law School. He is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors and holds the NACD Directorship Certification. The Company believes Admiral Dumont’s extensive leadership experience in national security, and government policy, as well as his expertise in corporate governance, risk management, and emerging technologies, qualifies him to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors.

David Bassett joined our board in May 2025 and is a retired Army Lieutenant General with a distinguished 35-year military career. Lieutenant General Bassett’s career includes extensive leadership driving military modernization and managing large-scale acquisitions. From 2020-2023, he served as Director of the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), where he led more than 11,000 civilian and military personnel who managed more than 250,000 contracts with total value in excess of $3.5 trillion. Prior to his role at DCMA, he served as Program Executive Officer for Command, Control, and Communications-Tactical (PEO C3T), where he led critical modernization priorities, including around development and acquisition of the Army’s tactical network. Prior to that, he served as Program Executive Officer for Ground Combat Systems (PEO GCS), where he led modernization efforts for the Army’s fleet of ground combat vehicles, including the Abrams, Bradley, and Stryker. His previous assignments include Deputy Program Executive Officer for Combat Support and Combat Service Support (PEO CS&CSS) and manager of the Joint Program Office, Joint Light Tactical Vehicles (JLTV). Lieutenant General Bassett serves as a Senior Counselor at The Cohen Group, a consulting firm, where he advises on business development, regulatory affairs, and capital raising activities. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering and a Master’s degree in Computer Science from the University of Virginia and is a graduate of the Army Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, as well as a distinguished graduate of the Industrial College of the Armed Forces. Our board of directors believes Mr. Bassett’s significant experience in relevant Army programs and acquisition strategies, leading military modernization efforts and managing complex programs and large-scale acquisitions, coupled with his organizational leadership, risk management skills, technology and defense market expertise make him well-suited to

serve as a member of our board of directors.

Board Composition and Election of Directors

Director Independence

Our board of directors currently consists of five members. Our board of directors has determined that Mitchell Herbets, Greg Matz, Mike Dumont, and David Bassett are all independent directors in accordance with the listing requirements of The Nasdaq Capital Market. The Nasdaq independence definition includes a series of objective tests, including that the director is not, and has not been for at least three years, one of our employees, and that neither the director nor any of his or her family members have engaged in various types of business dealings with us. In addition, as required by Nasdaq rules, our board of directors has made a subjective determination as to each independent director that no relationships exist, which, in the opinion of our board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In making these determinations, our board of directors reviewed and discussed information provided by the directors and us with regard to each director’s business and personal activities and relationships as they may relate to us and our management.

Board Committees and Independence

Our board of directors has established three standing committees – audit and risk, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance – each of which operates under a charter that has been approved by our board of directors.

Audit and Risk Committee

The Audit & Risk Committee represents and assists the Board of Directors with its oversight of the:

Membership

The Audit & Risk Committee shall consist of three or more directors, all of whom shall, in the judgment of the Board of Directors:

Duties and Responsibilities

The Audit & Risk Committee will review and approve such related party transactions based on the Board approved, One Stop Systems, Inc. “Related Party Transaction Policy”

The members of our audit and risk committee are Mr. Matz, Mr. Herbets, Mr. Dumont, and Mr. Bassett. Mr. Matz serves as chair of the committee. All members of our audit and risk committee meet the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and The Nasdaq Capital Market. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Matz qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable SEC rules and has the requisite financial sophistication as defined under the applicable Nasdaq rules and regulations. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Matz, Mr. Herbets, Mr. Dumont, and Mr. Bassett are independent under the applicable rules of the SEC and The Nasdaq Capital Market.

We are currently in compliance with Nasdaq rules and Rule 10A-3 since all members of our audit and risk committee have been deemed independent by our board of directors. The audit and risk committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and The Nasdaq Capital Market.

Compensation Committee

Our compensation committee approves, or recommends to our board of directors, policies relating to compensation and benefits of our officers and employees. The compensation committee approves, or recommends to our board of directors, annual and long-term corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our chief executive officer and other executive officers, evaluates the performance of these officers in light of those goals and objectives and approves, or recommends to our board of directors, the compensation of these officers based on such evaluations. The compensation committee also approves, or recommends to our board of directors, the issuance of stock options and other awards under our equity incentive plans. The compensation committee will review and evaluate, at least annually, the performance of the compensation committee and its members, including compliance by the compensation committee with its charter.

The members of our compensation committee are Mr. Herbets, Mr. Matz, Mr. Dumont, and Mr. Bassett. Mr. Herbets serves as the chair of the committee. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Herbets, Mr. Matz, Mr. Dumont, and Mr. Bassett are all independent under the applicable rules and regulations of The Nasdaq Capital Market and all current members qualify as a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Our board of directors has determined that each of the members of our compensation committee is an “outside director,” as that term is defined in Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or Section 162(m). We are currently in compliance with Nasdaq rules since all members of our compensation committee have been deemed independent by our board of directors. The compensation committee operates under a written charter, which the compensation committee will review and evaluate at least annually.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for assisting our board of directors in discharging the board of directors’ responsibilities regarding the identification of qualified candidates to become board members, the selection of nominees for election as directors at our annual meetings of stockholders (or special meetings of stockholders at which directors are to be elected), and the selection of candidates to fill any vacancies on our board of directors and any committees thereof. In addition, the nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for overseeing our corporate governance policies, reporting and making recommendations to our board of directors concerning governance matters, and oversight of the evaluation of our board of directors.

The members of our nominating and corporate governance committee are Mr. Dumont, Mr. Herbets, Mr. Matz, and Mr. Bassett. Mr. Dumont serves as the chair of the committee. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Dumont, Mr. Herbets, Mr. Matz, and Mr. Bassett are all independent under the applicable rules and regulations of The Nasdaq Capital Market relating to nominating and corporate governance committee independence. We are currently in compliance with Nasdaq rules due to the fact that all members of our nominating and corporate governance committee have been deemed independent by our board of directors. The nominating and corporate governance committee operates under a written charter, which the nominating and corporate governance committee will review and evaluate at least annually.

Board Composition

Our nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for reviewing with the board of directors, on an annual basis, the appropriate characteristics, skills, and experience required for the board of directors as a whole and its individual members. In evaluating the suitability of individual candidates (both new candidates and current members), the nominating and corporate governance committee, in recommending candidates for election, and the board of directors, in approving (and, in the case of vacancies, appointing) such candidates, will consider many factors, including the following:

Our board of directors evaluates each individual in the context of the board of directors as a whole, with the objective of assembling a group that can best maximize the success of the business and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its diversity of experience in these various areas.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between or among the directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen by us to become directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, during the past ten years, none of the following occurred with respect to a present or former director, executive officer, or employee: (i) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (ii) any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (iii) being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; and (iv) being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors, officers, and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer, controller, or persons performing similar functions. Our code of business conduct and ethics is available under the Investors – Corporate Governance section of our website at www.onestopsystems.com. In addition, we post on our website all disclosures that are required by law or the listing standards of The Nasdaq Capital Market concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the code. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained at or available through our website, and should not consider it to be a part of this Annual Report.

Compensation Recovery Policy

In October 2023, we adopted a compensation recovery policy (the “Compensation Recovery Policy”) that is designed to comply with, and will be interpreted in a manner consistent with, Section 10D and Rule 10D-1 of the Exchange Act and the applicable rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, including any interpretive guidance provided by Nasdaq. Under our Compensation Recovery Policy, in the event of an accounting restatement due to the Company’s material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, including any required accounting restatement to correct a material error in previously issued financial statements, or that would result in a material misstatement if the error were corrected in the current period or left uncorrected in the current period, the Company must recover erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation previously paid to the Company’s executive officers in accordance with the terms of such Compensation Recovery Policy. Furthermore, under the Compensation Recovery Policy, the Company is prohibited from indemnifying any executive officer or former executive officer against the loss of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation and from paying or reimbursing an executive officer for purchasing insurance to cover any such loss.

A copy of our Compensation Recovery Policy is attached as Exhibit 97.1 to this Annual Report.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, directors, executive officers, and beneficial owners of 10% or more of our common stock, or reporting persons, are required to report to the SEC on a timely basis the initiation of their status as a reporting person and any changes with respect to their beneficial ownership of our common stock. Based solely on our review of copies of such forms that we have received, or written representations from reporting persons, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, all executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders complied with all applicable filing requirements.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

This section discusses the material components of the executive compensation program for our executive officers who are named in the “Summary Compensation Table” below. In 2025, our “named executive officers” (“NEOs”) and their positions were as follows:

This discussion may contain forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans, considerations, expectations, and determinations regarding future compensation programs. Actual compensation programs that we adopt in the future may differ materially from the currently planned programs summarized in this discussion.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding the total compensation for services rendered in all capacities that was earned by each individual who served (i) as our principal executive officer at any time during 2024, and (ii) our two most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officer who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2025 or December 31, 2024, as applicable: