UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025

or

For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission file number: 001-12933

AUTOLIV, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

+46 8 587 20 600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes: ☒ No: ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes: ☒ No: ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262 (b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes: ☐ No: ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity of Autoliv, Inc. held by non-affiliates as of the last business day of the second fiscal quarter of 2025 amounted to $8,595 million.

Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of February 11, 2026: 74,706,513.

Auditor Firm Id: 1433 Auditor Name: Ernst & Young AB Auditor Location: Stockholm, Sweden Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the annual stockholders’ meeting to be held on May 7, 2026, to be dated on or around March 25, 2026 (the “2026 Proxy Statement”), are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

AUTOLIV, INC.

Index

NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements that are not historical facts but rather forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include those that address activities, events or developments that Autoliv, Inc. (“Autoliv,” the “Company” or “we”) or its management believes or anticipates may occur in the future. All forward-looking statements are based upon our current expectations, various assumptions and/or data available from third parties. Our expectations and assumptions are expressed in good faith and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them. However, there can be no assurance that such forward-looking statements will materialize or prove to be correct as forward-looking statements are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual future results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the future results, performance or achievements expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements.

In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “plans,” “intends,” “believes,” “may,” “likely,” “might,” “would,” “should,” “could,” or the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology, although not all forward-looking statements contain such words.

Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, the outcome could differ materially from those set out in the forward-looking statements for a variety of reasons, including without limitation: general global and regional economic conditions, including the impact of inflation; changes in light vehicle production; fluctuation in vehicle production schedules for which the Company is a supplier; global supply chain disruptions, including port, transportation, and distribution delays or interruptions; supply chain disruptions and component shortages specific to the automotive industry or the Company; potential changes to beneficial free trade agreements and regulations, such as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement; changes in geopolitical and other economic and political conditions or developments, including inflation, changes in trade policies, tariff regimes, and other developments in and by countries in which we do business that could materially impact supply chains, margins, access to capital, or overall business performance; political stability or geopolitical conflicts; changes in general industry or market conditions, including regional economic growth or decline; changes in and the successful execution of our capacity alignment, restructuring, cost reduction, and efficiency initiatives and the market reaction thereto; loss of business from increased competition; volatility or increases in raw material, fuel, and energy costs; changes in consumer and customer preferences for end products; loss of customers or sales; legislative or regulatory changes; customer bankruptcies, consolidations or restructuring or divestiture of customer brands; unfavorable fluctuations in currencies or interest rates among the various jurisdictions in which we operate; market acceptance of our new products; costs or difficulties related to the integration of any new or acquired businesses and technologies; continued uncertainty in pricing and other negotiations with customers, including inflation and tariff compensations; successful integration of acquisitions and operations of joint ventures; successful implementation of strategic partnerships and collaborations; our ability to be awarded new business; product liability, warranty and recall claims and investigations and other litigation, civil judgments or financial penalties and customer reactions thereto; higher expenses for our pension and other postretirement benefits, including higher funding needs for our pension plans; work stoppages or other labor issues; possible adverse results of pending or future litigation or infringement claims, and the availability of insurance with respect to such matters; our ability to protect our intellectual property rights; negative impacts of antitrust investigations or other governmental investigations and associated litigation relating to the conduct of our business; tax assessments or results of tax audits by governmental authorities and changes in our effective tax rate; dependence on key personnel; our ability to meet our sustainability targets, goals and commitments; dependence on and relationships with customers and suppliers; the conditions necessary to hit our financial targets; and other risks and uncertainties identified in Item 1A -“Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Item 1A, and Item 7 - “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report.

For any forward-looking statements contained in this or any other document, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and we assume no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements in light of new information or future events, except as required by law.

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

Autoliv, Inc. (“Autoliv”, the “Company” or “we”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal executive offices in Stockholm, Sweden where it currently employs approximately 113 people. The Company functions as a holding corporation and owns two principal subsidiaries, Autoliv AB and Autoliv ASP, Inc. The Company's fiscal year ends on December 31.

The Company is a leading developer, manufacturer, and supplier of passive safety systems to the automotive industry with a broad range of product offerings.

Passive safety systems are primarily meant to improve safety for occupants in a vehicle. Passive safety systems include modules and components for frontal-impact airbag protection systems, side-impact airbag protection systems, pedestrian protection systems, steering wheels, inflator technologies, battery cut-off switches and seatbelts.

To expand its product offerings, the Company formed Mobility Safety Solutions. By combining its core competence and industry experience, the Company also develops and manufactures mobility safety solutions such as passive safety systems for commercial vehicles, battery cut-off switches, and safety solutions for riders of motorcycles and bikes.

The Company has 62 production facilities in 23 countries and its customers include the world’s largest car manufacturers. The Company’s sales in 2025 were $10.8 billion, approximately 68% of which consisted of airbag and steering wheel products and approximately 32% of which consisted of seatbelt products. The Company's business is conducted in the following geographical regions: The Americas, Europe, China, and Asia, excluding China.

On December 31, 2025, the Company had approximately 64,300 personnel worldwide, with 10% being temporary personnel.

Additional information required by this Item 1 regarding developments in the Company’s business during 2025 is contained under Item 7 in this Annual Report.

Reportable Segment

The Company has one reportable segment based on the way the Company evaluates its financial performance and manages its operations. The Company's business is comprised of passive safety products – principally airbags (including steering wheels and inflators) and seatbelts. For more information regarding the Company’s segment reporting, see Note 1, Basis of Presentation, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

Products, Market, and Competition

Products

Providing life-saving solutions is a key priority as the world population grows and develops. However, population expansion in growth markets and the rise of megacities creates new complexities. To meet this challenge, the Company develops safety solutions for both mobility and society that work in real life situations. The Company's passive safety systems such as seatbelts and airbags substantially mitigate human consequences of traffic accidents.

The airbag module is designed to inflate extremely rapidly and then quickly deflate during a collision or impact. It consists of the container, an airbag cushion, and an inflator. The purpose of the airbag is to provide the occupants a cushioning and restraint during a crash event to prevent any impact or impact-caused injuries between the occupant and the interior of the vehicle.

Seatbelts can reduce the overall risk of serious injuries in frontal crashes by as much as 60% due to advanced seatbelt technologies such as pretensioners and load limiters.

The Company also manufactures steering wheels that are crafted to ensure they meet safety requirements and are functional as well as stylish.

Market and Competition

Consumer research clearly shows that consumers want safe vehicles, and several significant trends are likely to positively influence overall safety content per vehicle. These include:

1) Society becoming increasingly focused on Vision Zero and its goal of reducing traffic fatalities and their associated costs;

2) Demographic trends of increased urbanization, aging driver populations, and increased safety focus in growth markets;

3) Evolving government regulations and test rating systems to improve the safety of vehicles in various markets, such as the updated European New Car Assessment Program (Euro NCAP), China NCAP, and USNCAP; and

4) The trend towards autonomous vehicles may lead to roomier interiors that may require more advanced passive safety systems.

The automotive passive safety market is driven by two primary factors: light vehicle production (LVP) and content per vehicle (CPV).

The first growth driver, LVP, has increased at an average annual growth rate of around 1.9% since the start of Autoliv in 1997 despite persistent headwinds in Europe and North America. According to S&P Global, LVP is forecasted to grow to close to 92 million by 2028 from just over 90 million in 2025, due to growing demand and export in medium- and low-income markets.

Unlike LVP, where Autoliv can only aim to be on the best-selling platforms, Autoliv can influence CPV more directly by continuously developing and introducing new technologies with higher value-added features. Over the long term, this increases average safety CPV and has caused the Company's markets to grow faster than the LVP.

Since 1997, the Company’s sales compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for passive safety has been around 5% compared to the market rate of around 2.8% which includes an LVP growth of around 1.9%. The Company's outperformance is a result of a steady flow of new passive safety technologies, strong focus on quality and a superior global footprint both in products and engineering. This has enabled Autoliv to increase its global market share in passive safety from 27% in 1997 to around 44% in 2025.

In high-income markets (Western Europe, North America, Japan, and South Korea) the average CPV is around $350. CPV growth in these regions mainly comes from new safety systems such as active seatbelts, knee airbags, and front-center airbags along with improved protection for pedestrians and rear-seat occupants like bag-in-belt or more advanced seatbelts.

In medium- and low-income markets (all markets other than the high-income markets mentioned above), the Company sees great opportunities for CPV growth from more airbags and advanced seatbelt products. The average CPV in these markets is around $210, which is almost $140 less than in the high-income markets.

As a result of higher installation rates of airbags, more advanced seatbelt products, and more complex steering wheels, CPV is expected to increase at a similar pace in both high-income and medium- and low-income markets over the next three years.

In the next three years, almost all LVP growth is expected to come in medium- and low-income regions with lower CPV, leading to a dilution of the average global CPV. Despite this negative regional LVP mix effect, the annual passive safety market (seatbelts and airbags, including steering wheels), is expected to grow from around $24 billion in 2025 to almost $26 billion over the next three years, based on the current macro-economic outlook and the Company's internal market intelligence and estimates.

In seatbelts, Autoliv has a global market share of around 45%, primarily due to being the technology leader with several important innovations such as pretensioners and active seatbelts. The Company's strong market position is also a reflection of its superior global footprint. Seatbelts are the primary life-saving safety product globally and are also an important requirement in low-end vehicles in the medium- and low-income markets. This provides the Company with an excellent opportunity to benefit from the expected growth in this segment of the market.

Autoliv holds a leading position in both airbags and steering wheels, with a combined market shares of around 44%. The market for airbags and steering wheels is expected to grow primarily due to increasing installation rates of inflatable curtains, side airbags, knee airbags, and front‑center airbags, as well as rising demand for higher‑value steering wheels with leather and additional integrated functions.

The Company's ability to consistently outperform market growth is rooted in a steady flow of new safety technologies, a strong focus on quality, and a superior production and engineering footprint.

The Company's competitors

Autoliv is the clear market leader in passive safety components and systems for the automotive industry with an estimated global market share of around 44%.

ZF AG, one of the Company's largest competitors, is a global leader in drive-line and chassis technology as well as in passive safety technologies and is one of the largest global automotive suppliers.

Another large competitor is Joyson Safety Systems (JSS), a subsidiary of Ningbo Joyson Electronic Corp. JSS is the result of the merger between Key Safety Systems (KSS) and Takata Corporation after KSS acquired Takata in 2018.

In Japan, Brazil, South Korea, and China, there are a number of local suppliers that have close ties with the domestic vehicle manufacturers. For example, Toyota uses “keiretsu” (in-house) suppliers Tokai Rika for seatbelts and Toyoda Gosei for airbags and steering wheels. These suppliers generally receive most of the Toyota business in Japan, in the same way, Mobis, a major supplier to Hyundai/Kia in South Korea, generally receives a significant part of their business. Also BYD Auto., Ltd. (BYD) has a high degree of vertical integration, with a large proportion of in-house sourcing of products and systems. This includes passive safety systems, which is supplied by its subsidiary FinDreams Technology. Autoliv supplies components, especially inflators, to FinDreams Technology.

Other competitors include Nihon Plast and Ashimori in Japan, Yanfeng and Jinheng in China, Samsong in South Korea, and Chris Cintos de Seguranca in South America. Collectively, these competitors account for the majority of the remaining market share in passive safety.

Additional information concerning the Company's products, markets and competition is included in the “Risks and Risk Management” section under Item 7 of this Annual Report.

Manufacturing and Production

See “Item 2. Properties” for a description of Autoliv’s principal properties. The component factories manufacture inflators, propellant, initiators, textile cushions, webbing, pressed steel parts, springs, and over molded steel parts used in seatbelt and airbag assembly and steering wheels. The assembly factories source components from a number of parties, including Autoliv’s own component factories, and assemble complete restraint systems for “just-in-time” delivery to customers. The products manufactured by Autoliv’s consolidated subsidiaries in 2025 consisted of 143 million complete seatbelt systems (of which 100 million were fitted with pretensioners), 143 million side airbags (including curtain airbags and front center airbags), 61 million frontal airbags and 21 million steering wheels.

Autoliv’s “just-in-time” delivery system is designed to accommodate the specific requirements of each customer for low levels of inventory and rapid stock delivery service. “Just-in-time” deliveries require final assembly or, at least, distribution centers in geographic areas close to customers to facilitate rapid delivery. The fact that the major automobile manufacturers are continually expanding their production activities into more countries and require the same or similar safety systems as those produced in Europe, Japan, or the U.S. increases the importance for suppliers to have assembly capacity in several countries. Consolidation among the Company's customers also supports this trend.

Autoliv’s assembly operations generally are not constrained by capacity considerations unless there is a disruption in the supply of raw materials and components. When dramatic shifts in LVP occur, Autoliv can generally adjust capacity in response to any changes in demand within a few days by adding or removing work shifts and within a few months by adding or removing standardized production and assembly lines. Most of Autoliv’s assembly factories can make sufficient space available to accommodate additional production lines to satisfy foreseeable increases in capacity. As a result, Autoliv can usually adjust its manufacturing capacity faster than its customers can adjust their capacity as a result of fluctuations in the general demand for vehicles or in the demand for a specific vehicle model, provided that customers promptly notify Autoliv when they become aware of such changes in demand. However, these types of adjustments can be costly and can impact Autoliv's operating margin.

When significant volatility in LVP occurs, as we saw in 2022 and 2023 due to supply disruptions, or when there is a shift in regional LVP, the capacity adjustments can take more time and be more costly. During 2025 the volatility of LVP improved, although it is still more volatile than prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, when there is significant demand for a given product due to a major recall of a competitor’s product, like certain of the Company's customers have experienced, capacity adjustments may take time.

The Company could experience disruption in its supply or delivery chain, which could cause one or more of its customers to halt or delay production. For more information, see Item 1A – “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report.

Quality Management

Autoliv believes that superior quality is a prerequisite to being considered a leading global supplier of automotive safety systems and is key to the Company's financial performance, because quality excellence is critical for winning new orders, preventing recalls, and maintaining low scrap rates. Autoliv has for many years emphasized a “zero-defect” proactive quality policy and continues to strive to improve its working methods. Autoliv’s products are expected to always meet performance expectations and be delivered to its customers at the right times and in the right amounts. The Company believes its continued quality improvements further enhance the Company's reputation among its customers, employees, and governmental authorities.

Although quality has always been paramount in the automotive industry, especially for safety products, automobile manufacturers have become increasingly focused on quality with even less tolerance for any deviations. This intensified focus on quality is partially due to an increase in the number of vehicle recalls for a variety of reasons (not just safety), including a few high-profile vehicle recalls. This trend is likely to continue as automobile manufacturers introduce even stricter quality requirements and regulating agencies and other authorities increase the level of scrutiny given to vehicle safety issues. The Company has not been immune to the recalls that have been impacting the automotive industry.

The Company continues to drive its quality initiative called “Q5,” which was initiated in 2010. It is an integral part of the Company's strategy of shaping a proactive quality culture of zero defects. It is called “Q5” because it addresses quality in five dimensions: products, customers, growth, behavior, and suppliers. The goal of Q5 is to firmly tie together quality with value within all of the Company's processes and for all of its employees, thereby leading to the best value for its customers. Since 2010, the Company has continually focused on this quality initiative to provide additional skills training to more employees and suppliers. These activities have significantly improved the Company's quality performance.

In the Company's pursuit of quality excellence, the Company developed a chain of four “defense lines” to deal with potential quality issues. The defense lines are: 1) robust product designs, 2) flawless components from suppliers and the Company's own in-house component companies, 3) manufacturing flawless products with a system for verifying that the Company's products conform with specifications, and 4) an advanced traceability system in the event of a recall.

The Company's pursuit of quality excellence extends from the earliest phases of product development to the proper disposal of a product following many years of use in a vehicle. Autoliv’s comprehensive Autoliv Product Development System (“APS”) includes several key check points during the process of developing new products that are designed to ensure that such products are well-built and have no hidden defects. Through this process, the Company works closely with its suppliers and customers to set clear standards that help to ensure robust component design and lowest cost for function in order to proactively prevent problems and ensure the Company delivers only the best designs to the market.

The APS, based on the goals of improving quality and efficiency, is at the core of Autoliv’s manufacturing philosophy. APS integrates essential quality elements, such as mistake proofing, statistical process control and operator involvement, into the manufacturing processes so all Autoliv associates are aware of and understand the critical connection between themselves and the Company's lifesaving products. This “zero-defect” principle extends beyond Autoliv to the entire supplier base. All of the Company's suppliers must accept the strict quality standards in the global Autoliv Supplier Manual, which defines the Company's quality requirements and focuses on preventing bad parts from being produced by its suppliers and helps eliminate defective intermediate products in the Company's assembly lines as early as possible. In addition, Autoliv’s One Product One Process (“1P1P”) initiative is its strategy for developing and managing standardization of both core products and customer-specific features, leading not only to improved quality, but also greater cost efficiency and more efficient supply chain management.

IATF 16949:2016 is one of the automotive industry’s most widely used international standards for quality management. All Autoliv facilities that ship products to OEMs are regularly certified according to the International Automotive Task Force (IATF) standards.

Environmental and Safety Regulations

For information on how environmental and safety regulations impact the Company's business, see “Risk Factors – ‘Our business may be adversely affected by laws or regulations, including environmental, occupational health and safety, and other governmental regulations’, “Global climate change could negatively affect our business”, “Our goals, targets, and ambitions related to sustainability and emissions reduction, and our public statements and disclosures regarding them, may, from time to time, result in additional considerations or expectations and expose us to risks” and “Our business may be adversely affected by changes in automotive safety regulations or concerns that drive further regulation of the automobile safety market”” in Item 1A and “Risks and Risk Management” in Item 7 of this Annual Report.

Raw Materials

Direct material cost represents approximately 54% of the Company's net sales in 2025. The Company mainly purchases manufactured components and raw materials for its operations. The Company takes several actions to manage the raw material fluctuations, such as competitive sourcing and looking for alternative materials. The Company is also taking necessary actions to gradually implement raw materials with a lower carbon emission footprint.

For information on the sources and availability of raw materials, see "Operational Risks - Component costs" in Item 7 and “Risk Factors – Changes in the source, cost, availability of and regulations pertaining to raw materials and components may adversely affect our profit margins” in Item 1A of this Annual Report.

Intellectual Property

The Company has developed a considerable amount of proprietary technology related to automotive safety systems and relies on many patents to protect such technology. The Company's intellectual property plays an important role in maintaining its competitive position in a number of the markets the Company serves. For information on the Company's use of intellectual property and its importance to the Company, see “Risk Factors – If our patents are declared invalid or our technology infringes on the proprietary rights of others, our ability to compete may be impaired” in Item 1A of this Annual Report.

Backlog

The Company has frame contracts with automobile manufacturers and such contracts are typically entered into up to three years before the start of production of the relevant car model or platform and provide for a term covering the life of such car model or platform including service parts after a vehicle model is no longer produced. These contracts, however, do not typically provide minimum quantities, firm prices, or exclusivity but instead permit the automobile manufacturer to resource the relevant products at given intervals (or at any time) from other suppliers. We sometimes refer to this backlog as our order intake or order book. For more information about order intake see “Risk Factors – The cyclical nature of automotive sales and production can adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. Our business is directly related to LVP in the global market and by our customers, and automotive sales and LVP are the most important drivers for our sales” in Item 1A of this Annual Report.

Dependence on Customers

In 2025, the Company's top five customers represented around 44% of its consolidated net sales and the Company's top ten customers represented around 70% of its consolidated net sales. This reflects the concentration of manufacturers in the automotive industry. In 2025 the Company's five largest customers accounted for around 40% of global LVP and the ten largest customers for around 56% of global LVP. A delivery contract is typically for the lifetime of a vehicle model, which is normally between five and seven years depending on customer platform sourcing preferences and strategies.

For information on the Company's dependence on customers, see “Risk Factors – Our business could be materially and adversely affected if we lost any of our largest customers, lose business from any of our largest customers, or if any of such customers are unable to pay their invoices” in Item 1A of this Annual Report, and “Dependence on Customers” under the section “Strategic Risks” in Item 7 of this Annual Report, and Note 21, Segment Information, to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Customer sales trends

Asian OEMs have steadily become increasingly important, mainly driven by growth with Japanese and Chinese OEMs. As a group Asian OEMs represented around 48% of the Company's consolidated net sales in 2025, of which Japanese OEMs accounted for almost two thirds. This is a result of the Company's stronger market position based on its local presence in Japan. As a group the Chinese OEMs accounted for around 8% of the Company's consolidated net sales in 2025, with Geely representing more than 2% of the Company's consolidated net sales. European based brands accounted for 30% of the Company's consolidated net sales in 2025. The U.S. based OEMs (including Chrysler and new EV manufactures) accounted for 20% of the Company's global sales in 2025. Globally, the Company's strongest growing customers from 2024 to 2025 were Stellantis, followed by Suzuki, Toyota and Chery .

Research, Development and Engineering, net (R,D&E)

During 2025, gross expenditures for R,D&E amounted to $616 million compared to $612 million in 2024. Of these amounts, $202 million in 2025 and $214 million in 2024 were related to customer-funded engineering projects and crash tests reimbursed by the customers. Net of this income, R,D&E expenditures in 2025 was $413 million compared to $398 million in 2024. Of the gross R,D&E expense in 2025, 79% was for projects and programs where the Company has customer orders, typically related to vehicle models in development. The remaining 21% was mainly for new innovations, products and standardizations that may yield benefits over time.

No single customer project accounted for more than 2% of Autoliv’s total gross R,D&E spending during 2025. To support Autoliv’s product portfolio, additional expertise is brought in-house via technology partnerships and licensing agreements.

Regulatory Costs

The fitting of seatbelts in most types of motor vehicles is mandatory in almost all countries and many countries have strict laws regarding the use of seatbelts while in vehicles. In addition, most developed countries require that seats in intercity buses and commercial vehicles be fitted with seatbelts. In the U.S., federal legislation requires frontal airbags on the driver-side and the passenger-side of all new passenger cars, sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks, and vans.

For information concerning the material effects on the Company's business relating to its compliance with government safety regulations, see “Risk Factors – ‘Our business may be adversely affected by laws or regulations, including environmental, occupational health and safety, and other governmental regulations’ and ‘Our business may be adversely affected by changes in automotive safety regulations or concerns that drive further regulation of the automobile safety market’” in Item 1A of this Annual Report and in Item 7 under the section “Risks and Risk Management” of this Annual Report.

Climate change

The Company is committed to operating its business in an environmentally sustainable manner, meaning developing and producing products in a resource efficient way while limiting the Company's environmental impact in the most material areas of greenhouse gas emissions, energy use, waste, and water. With particular emphasis on climate action, the Company actively engages with its customers, suppliers, and others to drive sustainable mobility.

In June 2021, the Company launched an updated climate strategy including new long-term climate ambitions:

These industry-leading climate ambitions are aligned with a 1.5°C trajectory and should position the Company as the supplier of choice for the most climate-focused customers, helping to ensure the Company's competitiveness now and in the future. In addition to these ambitions, the Company adopted Science Based Targets (SBTs) for 2030 covering its own operations as well as the supply chain. The targets were approved in January 2022 and are available at the SBTi website.

For more information about how climate change impacts the Company's business, see "Risk Factors – Global climate change could negatively affect our business” in Item 1A of this Annual Report.

Human Capital Management

The Company's drive for excellence is what makes Autoliv the world’s leading supplier of automotive safety systems. From the earliest stages of product development to sales and design to the final delivery of the finished product, Autoliv's employees are driven by the Company's mission to Save More Lives.

The successful execution of the Company's strategies relies on its ability to shape a quality and performance-oriented culture, and to adapt quickly to sudden shifts in circumstances, such as supply chain disruptions and geopolitical instability. As the Company moves forward, its workforce including both employees and temporary personnel, strives to respond with agility to new opportunities for growth and improvement while delivering excellence to its customers. The Company builds a winning team by focusing on creating a work environment that attracts, retains, and engages its employees.

The table below shows the Company's total workforce as of December 31, 2025, and 2024.

Of the Company’s total workforce as of December 31, 2025, 29% (2024: 30%) is located in the Americas, 22% (2024: 19%) in Asia (excluding China), 14% (2024: 14%) in China, and 35% (2024: 37%) in Europe (including South Africa, Tunisia and Turkey).

Talent Attraction, Development, and Retention

The Company believes that attraction, development, and retention of talent is essential to its success. The Company offers an inclusive work environment where its employees are challenged and achieve great things together. The Company seeks individuals who hold varied experiences and viewpoints to create a workplace that allows each employee to do their best work and drive the Company's collective success. The Company's workforce reflects the diversity of the countries and cultures in which it operates.

Supporting the development of the employees is essential in a highly competitive and rapidly changing environment. An important cornerstone of each employee’s growth is the ongoing dialogue between the team member and manager, which is summarized during an annual Performance and Development Dialogue (PDD). During the year, 100% of targeted employees conducted a PDD with their managers. To provide opportunities for professional and personal growth of the employees, the Company has a multitude of development channels, including technical and specialist career paths, international assignments, and other such programs.

The Company provides market-based competitive compensation through its salary, annual incentive, and long-term incentive programs and benefits packages that promote employee well-being across all aspects of their lives.

Health and Safety

The Company is committed to providing a zero-injury work environment that promotes the health, safety, and welfare of its employees. Autoliv’s production facilities implement the Company's health and safety management system, which drives continuous improvement in health and safety, supported by the Company's leadership. Execution of the system is monitored through internal and external ISO 45001 occupational health and safety management system audits. At the end of 2025, 70% of the Company's production facilities were certified to the ISO 45001 standard.

Labor Relations

The Company offers fair terms and conditions of employment. The Company's overall purpose, Code of Conduct, talent development strategies, and employment policies support the principles in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Labor Organization’s Fundamental Principles and Labor Standards.

The Company considers its relationship with its employees to be good. While there have been a small number of minor labor disputes historically, such disputes have not had a significant or lasting impact on the Company's relationship with its employees, and customer perception of its employee practices or its business results. Around 60% of the Company’s workforce outside the United States is covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

Major unions in Europe to which some of the Company's employees belong include: IG Metall in Germany; Unite the union in the United Kingdom; Confédération Générale des Travailleurs (CGT), Confédération Française Démocratique du Travail (CFDT), Confédération Française de l’Encadrement Confédération Générale des cadres (CFE-CGC), Force Ouvrière (FO), Confédération Française des Travailleurs Chrétiens (CFTC), Solidaires, Unitaires, Démocratiques (SUD) and Conféderation Autonome du Travail (CAT) in France; Union General de Trabajadores (UGT), Union Sindical Obrera (USO), Comisiones Obereras (CCOO) and Confederacion General de Trabajadores (CGT) in Spain; IF Metall, Unionen, Sveriges Ingenjörer and Ledarna in Sweden; Industriaal- ja Metallitöötajate Ametiühingute Liit (IMTAL) in Estonia; Vasas Szakszervezeti Szövetség (Hungarian Metallworkers‘ Federation) in Hungary; Samorzadny NiezalezĪny Zwiazek Zawodowy Pracownikow and Zakladowa Organizacja Związkowa NSZZ Solidarnosc in Poland; National Union of Metal Workers South Africa (NUMSA) in South Africa; Union Générale des Travailleurs Tunisiens (UGTT) and Union des travailleurs Tunisians (UTT) in Tunisia, and Türk Metal Sendikasi in Turkey.

In addition, the Company’s employees in other regions are represented by the following unions:  Unifor in Canada; Sindicato de Jornaleros y Obreros Industriales y de la Industria Maquiladora de H. Matamoros, Tamaulipas (CTM); Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Industria Metalúrgica y Similares, Federación Valle de Toluca; Sindicato Nacional “Nueva Cultura Laboral” de Trabajadores de la Fabricación, Manufactura, Ensamble de Autopartes Mecánicas Eléctricas y Componentes de la Industria Automotriz (CROC); Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Industria Arnesera, Eléctrica, Automotriz y Aeronáutica de la República Mexicana; Sindicato Industrial de Trabajadores de la Transformación Construcción Automotriz Agropecuaria Plásticos y de la Industria en General, del Comercio y Servicios Similares, Anexos y Conexos del Estado de Querétaro “Angel Castillo Reséndiz" and Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Industria de Autopartes en General y/o Similares, Conexos y sus Servicios de la República Mexicana (CTM) in Mexico; Sindicato dos Metalúrgicos de Taubaté e Região and Sindicato dos Trabalhadores nas Indústrias Metalúrgicas, Mecânicas e de Material Elétrico de Pernambuco in Brazil; Autoliv India Employees Association, Bangalore & Mysore in India; Quang Yen Union in Vietnam; Korean Metal Workers Union (FKTU) in South Korea; Autoliv Japan Roudou Kumiai in Japan, and All-China Federation of Trade Unions in China.

In many European countries, Canada, Mexico, Brazil and South Korea, wages, salaries and general working conditions are negotiated with local unions and/or are subject to centrally negotiated collective bargaining agreements. The terms of the Company's various agreements with unions typically range between one to three years. Some of the Company's subsidiaries in Europe, Canada, Mexico, Brazil and South Korea must negotiate with the applicable local unions with respect to important changes in operations, working and employment conditions. Twice a year, members of the Company’s management conduct a meeting with the European Works Council (EWC) to provide employee representatives with important information about the Company and a forum for the exchange of ideas and opinions. In many Asia Pacific countries, the central or regional governments provide guidance each year for salary adjustments or statutory minimum wage for workers. The Company's employees may join associations in accordance with local legislation and rules, although the level of unionization varies significantly throughout its operations.

Available Information

The Company files or furnishes with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) periodic reports and amendments thereto, which include annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and other information. Such reports, amendments, proxy statements, and other information are made available free of charge on the Company's corporate website at www.autoliv.com and are available as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with the SEC. The Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters, code of conduct, and other documents governing the Company are also available on its corporate website at www.autoliv.com. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy statements and other information at www.sec.gov. Hard copies of the above-mentioned documents can be obtained free of charge by contacting the Company at: Autoliv, Inc., P.O. Box 70381, SE-107 24, Stockholm, Sweden.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition may be impacted by a number of factors. A discussion of the risks associated with these material risk factors is included below.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY

The cyclical nature of automotive sales and production can adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. Our business is directly related to LVP in the global market and by our customers, and automotive sales and LVP are the most important drivers for our sales

Automotive sales and production are highly cyclical and can be affected by general or regional economic or industry conditions, the level of consumer demand, recalls and other safety issues, labor relations issues, technological changes, fuel prices and availability, vehicle safety regulations and other regulatory requirements, governmental initiatives, trade agreements, political volatility (especially in energy producing countries and growth markets), changes in interest rate levels and credit availability, and other factors. Some regions around the world may at various times be more particularly impacted by these factors than other regions. Economic declines that result in a significant reduction in automotive sales and production by our customers have in the past had, and may in the future have, a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. Our sales are also affected by the inventory levels of our customers, which we cannot predict. Customers may choose to increase or reduce inventory levels at any time, and new inventory levels may not align with historical trends. These fluctuations can add variability to customer call-offs, our production schedules, and order intake, potentially impacting our revenues and financial condition. Uncertainty regarding inventory levels may be further impacted by consumer financing programs initiated or terminated by our customers or governments, as such changes can influence the timing of sales. Changes in automotive sales and LVP and/or customers’ inventory levels will have an impact on our financial targets, earnings guidance, and estimates. In addition, we base our growth projections in part on business awards, or order intake, made by our customers. However, actual production orders from our customers may not approximate the awarded business or our estimated order intake. Any significant reduction in automotive sales and/or LVP by our customers, whether due to general economic conditions or any other factors relevant to sales or LVP, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Growth rates in safety CPV, which can be impacted by changes in consumer trends, political decisions, crash test ratings and safety regulations could affect our results in the future

We estimate that the average global content of passive safety systems per light vehicle in 2025 was close to $270. Vehicles produced in different markets may have various passive safety content values. For example, in high-income markets, light vehicles have an average passive safety content value of approximately $350 per vehicle, whereas in growth markets, such as China and India, the average passive safety content value is approximately $210 and $140 per vehicle, respectively. Due to the concentration of the majority of the growth in global LVP over time in growth markets, our operating results may be impacted if the passive safety CPV remains low and if the penetration of automotive safety systems does not increase in these regions. As passive safety CPV is also an indicator of our sales development, should these trends continue, the average value of passive safety systems per vehicle could decline.

We operate in a highly competitive market

The market for passive safety systems is highly competitive, and we face competition from a number of other companies that produce and sell similar products. Among other factors, our products compete on the basis of price, quality, manufacturing and distribution capability, design and performance, technological innovation, delivery, and service. Some of our competitors are subsidiaries (or divisions, units or similar) of larger companies with greater financial and other resources than us. Some of our competitors may also have “preferred status” as a result of special relationships or ownership interests with certain customers. Our ability to compete successfully depends, in large part, on our success in continuing to innovate and manufacture products that have commercial success with our customer and end-consumers, differentiating our products from those of our competitors, continuing to deliver quality products in the time frames required by our customers, and maintaining best-cost production. We continue to invest in technology and innovation, which we believe are critical to our long-term growth. Our ability to maintain and improve existing products, while successfully developing and introducing distinctive new and enhanced products that anticipate changing customer and consumer preferences and capitalize upon emerging technologies will be a significant factor in our ability to remain competitive. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing such products and services. In addition, our implementation of certain new technologies, such as those related to artificial intelligence, automation and algorithms, may have unintended consequences due to any limitations or failure to use them effectively. If we are unsuccessful or are less successful than our competitors in predicting the course of market development, developing innovative products, processes, and/or use of materials or adapting to new technologies or evolving regulatory, industry or customer requirements, we may be placed at a competitive disadvantage. Given the competitive nature of our business, the number of awards we are awarded relative to our peers may decrease over time and our past order intake is not an indicator of future levels or order intake. Additionally, OEMs rigorously evaluate our products and performance against competitors on the basis of quality, reliability, cost-effectiveness, and the overall competitive landscape. If any OEM customer determines that using a competitor's product would yield better financial results or would help maintain supply chain resilience, it may result in loss in business and could affect our ability to be competitive and may decrease our current market share. The inability to compete successfully could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

The discontinuation, lack of commercial success, or loss of business with respect to a particular vehicle model for which we are a significant supplier could reduce our sales and harm our business

A number of our customer contracts generally require us to supply a customer’s annual requirements for a particular vehicle model and assembly facilities, rather than to manufacture a specific quantity of products. Such contracts range from one year to the life of the model, which is generally four to seven years. These contracts are often subject to renegotiation, sometimes as frequently as annually, which may affect product pricing, and generally may be terminated by our customers at any time. Therefore, the discontinuation of, the loss of business with respect to, or a lack of commercial success of a particular vehicle model or brand for which we are a significant supplier could reduce our sales and harm our business, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition.

We continue to expand our product offerings beyond light passenger vehicles to include other mobility safety solutions. If we are not successful in expanding our product offerings, or if it takes longer or costs more than expected, it could harm our business

We continue to expand our product offerings to focus on mobility safety solutions. Because mobility safety product offerings are still in the development stages, it is difficult for us to anticipate the level of sales they may generate. The expansion of our product offering will require us to invest time and resources to develop innovative products, such as wearables and two-wheeler passive safety products, that keep pace with continuing changes in industry standards and to reach new customers who have rapidly changing preferences. Our product offerings might not receive customer acceptance if customer preferences shift to other products, and our future success depends in part on our ability to anticipate and respond to these changes. If we are not successful in expanding our product offerings or if it takes longer or costs more than expected, it could negatively impact our operating results, financial condition, competitive position, and future business prospects.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

We may incur material losses and costs as a result of product liability, warranty, and recall claims that may be brought against us or our customers

We face risks related to product liability claims, warranty claims, and recalls if any of our products are, or are alleged to be defective, fail to perform as expected, or result, or are alleged to result, in bodily injury and/or property damage. We may not be able to anticipate all potential performance or reliability issues that could arise after our products are released to the market. Additionally, increasing regulations and reporting requirements regarding potentially defective products, particularly in the U.S., may increase the possibility that we become involved in additional product liability or recall investigations or claims. See “–Risks Related to Government Regulations and Taxes–Our business may be adversely affected by changes in automotive safety regulations or concerns that drive further regulation of the automobile safety market”.

Although we currently carry product liability and product recall insurance in excess of our self-insured amounts, there can be no assurance that such insurance will provide adequate coverage against potential claims, that such insurance will be available or continue to be available in the appropriate markets, or that we will be able to obtain such insurance on acceptable terms in the future. The cost of this insurance has risen in recent years and our self-insured amounts have increased as well. Although we have invested and will continue to invest in our engineering, design, and quality infrastructure, we cannot give any assurance that our products will be free suffer from defects or other deficiencies or that we will not experience material warranty claims or product recalls. In the future, we could incur material warranty or product liability losses and significant costs to process and defend these claims. A successful claim brought against us in excess of available insurance coverage, if any, or a requirement to participate in any product recall, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, cash flows, and financial condition.

Future recalls could result in costs not covered by insurance in excess of our self-insurance amounts, additional government inquiries, litigation, reputational harm, and diversion of management’s attention. The main variables affecting recall costs include: the number of vehicles ultimately determined to be affected, the cost per vehicle associated with the recall, the determination of proportionate responsibility among the customer, us, and any relevant sub-suppliers, and actual insurance recoveries. Each vehicle manufacturer has its own practices regarding product recalls and other product liability actions relating to its suppliers, and the performance and remedial requirements vary between jurisdictions. Due to recall activity in the automotive industry over the past decade, some vehicle manufacturers have become increasingly sensitive to recall risks. Government regulators have also become more focused on potential recall risks and recall rates, as demonstrated by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (“NHTSA”) investigation of the ARC inflators. If NHTSA proceeds with any recalls of ARC inflators, such a recall could have a material impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition. As suppliers become more integrally involved in the vehicle design process and assume more of the vehicle assembly functions, vehicle manufacturers are increasingly looking to their suppliers for contribution when faced with recalls and product liability claims. Product recalls in our industry, even when they do not involve our products, can harm the reputations of our customers, competitors, and us, particularly if those recalls cause consumers to question the safety or reliability of products similar to ours. In addition, with global platforms and procedures, vehicle manufacturers are increasingly evaluating our quality performance on a global basis; any one or more quality, warranty or other recall issue(s) (including issues affecting few units and/or having a small financial impact) may cause a vehicle manufacturer to implement measures that may have a severe impact on our operations, such as a global, temporary or prolonged suspension of new orders. In addition, as our products more frequently use global designs and are based on or utilize the same or similar parts, components or solutions, there is a risk that the number of vehicles affected globally by a failure or defect will increase significantly with a corresponding increase in our costs. A warranty, recall or product liability claim brought against us in excess of available insurance may have a material adverse effect on our business. Vehicle manufacturers are also increasingly requiring their suppliers to guarantee or warrant their products and bear repair and replacement costs of such products under new vehicle warranties. A vehicle manufacturer may attempt to hold us responsible for some or the entire repair or replacement costs of defective products under new vehicle warranties when the product supplied did not perform as represented. Accordingly, future warranty claims by our customers may be material. However, the final amounts determined to be due could differ materially from our recorded warranty estimates, and our business, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition may be materially impacted as a result. In addition, as we adopt new technologies, we face an inherent risk of exposure to the claims of others that we have allegedly violated their intellectual property rights. We cannot assure you that we will not experience any material warranty, product liability or intellectual property claim losses in the future, or that we will not incur significant costs to defend against such claims. See “–Risks Related to Intellectual Property–If our patents are declared invalid or our technology infringes on the proprietary rights of others, our ability to compete may be impaired”.

Escalating pricing pressures from our customers may adversely affect our business

The automotive industry continues to experience aggressive pricing pressure from customers. This trend is partly attributable to the major automobile manufacturers’ strong purchasing power. As with other automotive component manufacturers, we are often expected to quote fixed prices or are forced to accept prices with annual price reduction commitments for long-term sales arrangements or discounted reimbursements for engineering work. Price reductions have impacted our sales and profit margins and are expected to continue to do so in the future. While we in the past received inflation related pricing concessions from most of our customers, there is no guarantee that this will occur in the future. Our future profitability will depend upon, among other things, our ability to continuously reduce our cost per unit and maintain our cost structure, enabling us to remain cost-competitive. Our profitability is also influenced by our success in designing and marketing technological improvements in automotive safety systems, which helps us offset price reductions by our customers. If we are unable to offset continued price reductions through improved operating efficiencies and reduced expenditures, these price reductions may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition.

We could experience disruption in our supply or delivery chain, which could cause one or more of our customers to halt or delay production

We, as with other component manufactures in the automotive industry, ship our products to customer vehicle assembly facilities throughout the world on a “just-in-time” basis for our customers to maintain low inventory levels. Our suppliers (external suppliers as well as our own production sites) use a similar method in providing raw materials to us. However, this “just-in-time” method makes the logistics supply chain in our industry very complex and vulnerable to disruption. Disruptions in our supply chain may result for many reasons, including closures of one of our own or one of our suppliers’ facilities or critical manufacturing lines due to strikes or other labor disputes, mechanical failures, electrical outages, fires, explosions, critical pollution levels, critical health and safety and other working conditions issues (including epidemics and pandemics), natural disasters, war, geopolitical and economic instability, political upheaval, as well as logistical complications due to labor disruptions, weather or natural disasters, acts of terrorism or violence, mechanical failures, cybersecurity events, and legislation or regulation regarding the transport of hazardous goods. Inflation and pricing pressures have also negatively impacted companies in our supply chain. Additionally, we may experience disruptions if there are newly imposed trade restrictions or delays in customs processing, including if we are unable to obtain government authorization to export or import certain materials, including materials that may be viewed as dangerous such as the propellant used for our inflators. See "–Risks Related to Internal Operations–Tariffs, sanctions, and geopolitical conflicts may disrupt our multi-tier automotive supply chain, constrain access to critical components, and adversely affect our production capabilities and financial performance." As we continue to expand in growth markets, the risk of such disruptions is heightened. The unavailability of even a single small subcomponent necessary to manufacture one of our products, for whatever reason, could force us to cease production of that product, possibly for a prolonged period. Similarly, a potential quality issue could force us to halt deliveries while we validate the products. Even when products are ready to be shipped, or have been shipped, delays may arise before they reach our customer. Also, similar difficulties for other suppliers may force our customers to halt production, which may in turn impact our sales shipments to such customers. When we fail to deliver timely, we may have to absorb our own costs for identifying and resolving the ultimate problem as well as expeditiously producing and shipping replacement components or products. Generally, we must also carry the costs associated with “catching up,” such as overtime and premium freight. If we are the cause of a customer being forced to halt production, the customer may seek to recoup all of its losses and expenses from us. These losses and expenses could be very significant and may include consequential losses such as lost profits. Where a customer halts production because of another supplier failing to deliver on time, we may not be fully compensated, if at all. Thus, any such supply chain disruptions could severely impact our operations and/or those of our customers and force us to halt production for prolonged periods of time which could expose us to material claims for compensation and have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Adverse developments affecting our suppliers could harm our profitability

Any significant disruption in our supplier relationships, particularly relationships with single-source suppliers, could harm our profitability. Furthermore, some of our suppliers may not be able to sufficiently manage the currency commodity cost volatility and/or sharply changing volumes while still performing as we expect. For example, recalls or field actions from our customers can stress the capacity of our supply chain and may inhibit our ability to timely deliver order volumes. We may incur costs as we try to make contingency plans to manage the risks for delivery delays, production delays, production issues or delivery of non-conforming products by our suppliers.

Changes in the source, cost, availability of and regulations pertaining to raw materials and components may adversely affect our profit margins

Our business uses a broad range of raw materials and components in the manufacture of our products, nearly all of which are generally available from a number of qualified suppliers. Our industry may be affected from time to time by limited supplies or price fluctuations of certain key components and materials. Strong worldwide demand for certain raw materials has had a significant impact on prices and short-term availability in recent years. Such price increases have materially increased, and could continue to materially increase, our operating costs and materially and adversely affect our profit margins, as direct material costs amounted to approximately 54% of our net sales in 2025, of which approximately half represents raw material costs. Commercial negotiations with our customers and suppliers may not always offset all of the adverse impact of higher raw material, energy, labor, logistics, and commodity costs, including those resulting from tariffs and trade restrictions (including retaliatory tariffs). These negotiations may also not be successful in the future. Even where we are able to pass price increases on to our customers, there may be (i) a delay before we can do so, requiring us to absorb the cost increase in the interim, and (ii) a negative impact on our relationships with such customers and suppliers, which may limit our ability to secure future awards from customers and or obtain acceptable supplies from suppliers. In addition, no assurance can be given that the magnitude or duration of current or future cost increases will not have a larger adverse impact on our profitability or consolidated financial position than currently anticipated. Furthermore, if raw material costs decrease, the price for our products may also decrease, as such prices are often indexed to the raw material costs. Additionally, various government regulators require companies that manufacture products containing certain minerals and their derivatives that are known as “conflict minerals”, originating from the Democratic Republic of Congo or adjoining countries to perform due diligence and report the source of such materials. There are significant resources associated with complying with these requirements, including diligence efforts to determine the sources of conflict minerals used in our products and potential changes to our processes or supplies as a consequence of such diligence efforts. As there may be only a limited number of suppliers able to offer certified “conflict free” conflict minerals, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain necessary conflict free minerals from such suppliers in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. We may face reputational challenges if we determine that certain of our products contain minerals not determined to be conflict free or if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins for all minerals used in our products through the procedures we may implement.

Furthermore, our customers are increasingly requiring us to track sustainable sources of certain raw materials, which also requires additional diligence efforts and there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain these materials in a cost-efficient and sustainable manner. Accordingly, these rules and customer requirements may adversely affect our business, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition.

Our business could be materially and adversely affected if we lose any of our largest customers, lose business from any of our largest customers, or if any such customers are unable to pay their invoices

We are dependent on a few large customers with strong purchasing power. This is the result of customer consolidation in the last few decades. In 2025, our top five customers represented around 44% of our consolidated sales, and our largest customer contract accounted for around 2% of our consolidated sales. Although business with any given customer is typically split into several contracts (either on the basis of one contract per vehicle model or on a broader platform basis), the loss of business from any of our major customers (whether by lower overall demand for vehicles, cancellation of existing contracts or the failure to award us new business) could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. Additionally, supply chain disruptions experienced by our customers could result in, among others, decreased demand and production or aggressive renegotiation of supplier contracts, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. Similarly, further consolidation of our customers in the future could make us more reliant upon a smaller group of customers for a significant portion of our consolidated sales and negatively impact our bargaining power when contracting with such customers. Customers may put us on a “new business hold,” which would limit our ability to quote or be awarded all or part of their future vehicle contracts if quality or other issues arise in the vehicles for which we were a supplier. This could have a significant negative impact on our order intake. Such new business holds range in length and scope and are generally accompanied by a certain set of remedial conditions that must be met before we are eligible to bid for new business. Meeting any such conditions within the prescribed timeframe may require additional Company resources. A failure to satisfy any such conditions may have a material adverse impact on our operating results and financial condition in the long term. There is a risk that one or more of our major customers may be unable to pay our invoices as they become due or that a customer will simply refuse to make such payments given its financial difficulties. If a major customer enters into bankruptcy proceedings or similar proceedings whereby contractual commitments are subject to stay of execution and the possibility of legal or other modification, or if a major customer otherwise successfully procures protection against us legally enforcing its obligations, it is likely, absent special relief such as having a “preferred status”, that we will be forced to record a substantial loss. Additional information concerning our major customers is included in Note 21, Segment Information, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

Our inability to effectively manage the timing, quality, and costs of new program launches could adversely affect our business, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition

To compete effectively in the automotive supply industry, we must be able to launch new products that meet our customers’ timing, performance, and quality standards. At times, we face an uneven number of launches, and some launches, for various reasons, may have shortened launch lead times. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to install and certify the equipment needed to produce products for new programs in time for the start of production, or that transitioning our manufacturing facilities and resources to full production for such new programs will not impact production rates or other operational efficiency measures at our facilities. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that our customers will execute on schedule the launch of their new product programs, for which we might supply products. As a Tier 1 supplier, we must effectively coordinate the activities of numerous suppliers in order to launch programs successfully. Given the complexity of new program launches, particularly those involving new and innovative technologies, we may experience difficulties managing product quality, timeliness and associated costs. In addition, new program launches require a significant ramp-up of costs; however, sales related to these programs generally depend on the timing and success of new vehicle introductions by our customers. Our inability to effectively manage the timing, quality and costs of these new program launches could adversely affect our business, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition.

Changes in our product mix may impact our operating results and financial condition

We sell products that have varying profit margins. Our financial performance can be impacted depending on the mix of products we sell during a given period. Our earnings guidance, estimates, and financial targets assume a certain product sales mix as well as a geographic sales mix as many of the growth markets have a lower CPV. If actual results vary significantly from this projected product and geographic mix of sales, our operating results and financial condition could be negatively impacted.

We are involved from time to time in legal proceedings and our business may suffer as a result of adverse outcomes of current or future legal proceedings

We are, from time to time, involved in litigation, regulatory proceedings, and commercial or contractual disputes that may be significant. These matters may include, without limitation, disputes with our suppliers and customers, intellectual property claims, shareholder litigation, government investigations, class action lawsuits, personal injury claims, product liability claims, environmental issues, antitrust, customs and VAT disputes, employment, and tax issues. In such matters, government agencies or private parties may seek to recover from us very large, indeterminate amounts in penalties or monetary damages (including, in some cases, treble or punitive damages) or seek to limit our operations in some way. The possibility exists that claims may be asserted against us and their magnitude may remain unknown for long periods of time. For example, we are currently in the early stages of a dispute with the Mexican tax authorities in relation to various issues dealing with certain manufacturing activities that occur in Mexico. An adverse result in this or other similar disputes could have a materially negative impact on our operating results and financial condition. These types of lawsuits could require a significant amount of management’s time and attention and a substantial legal liability or adverse regulatory outcome and the substantial expenses to defend the litigation or regulatory proceedings may have a material adverse effect on our customer relationships, business prospects, reputation, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition. No assurances can be given that such proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse impact on our profitability and consolidated financial position or that our established reserves or our available insurance will mitigate such impact.

We are and may be in the future subject to civil antitrust litigation that could negatively impact our business

We have previously been the subject of an investigation by the European Commission (“EC”) regarding possible anti-competitive behavior among certain suppliers to the automotive vehicle industry that was resolved in 2019. We are subject to a civil antitrust lawsuit in Germany filed by a customer with respect to allegations over a decade ago and may be subject to such civil antitrust lawsuits in the future in countries that permit such civil claims, including lawsuits or other actions by our customers. These types of lawsuits require significant management time and attention and could result in significant expenses. Any unfavorable outcomes of such lawsuits could have a material adverse impact on our customer relationships, business prospects, reputation, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition, and our insurance may not mitigate such impact. See Note 19, Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

Work stoppages, slow-downs or other labor issues at our customers’ facilities or at our facilities could adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition

Because the automotive industry relies heavily on “just-in-time” delivery of components during the assembly and manufacture of vehicles, a work stoppage or slow-down at one or more of our facilities could have a material adverse effect on our business. Similarly, if any of our customers were to experience a work stoppage or slow-down, that customer may halt or limit the purchase of our products. Similarly, a work stoppage or slow-down at another supplier could interrupt production at one of our customers’ facilities which would have the same effect. Furthermore, geopolitical instability or conflicts could displace workers or trigger the migration of workers, causing labor shortages in critical areas, which could further disrupt operations. Labor shortages could also increase wages as multiple companies and facilities compete for a shrinking pool of workers. While labor contract negotiations at our facilities historically have rarely resulted in work stoppages, no assurances can be given that we will be able to negotiate acceptable contracts with these unions or that our failure to do so will not result in work stoppages. A work stoppage or other labor disruption at one or more of our facilities or our customers’ facilities could cause us to shut down production facilities supplying these products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Our ability to operate our company effectively could be impaired if we fail to attract and retain executive officers and other key personnel

Our ability to operate our business and implement our strategies effectively depends, in part, on the efforts of our executive officers and other key employees. Our future success will depend on, among other factors, our ability to attract, develop, and retain other qualified personnel, particularly engineers and other employees with software and technical expertise. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees or the failure to attract, develop, or retain other qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Restructuring, efficiency, and strategic initiatives and capacity alignments are complex and difficult and at any time additional restructuring steps may be necessary, possibly on short notice and at significant cost

Our restructuring, efficiency, strategic initiatives and capacity alignments include efforts to adjust our manufacturing capacity, direct and indirect labor workforce, and cost structure to meet current and projected operational and market requirements. These efforts include plant closures, transferring sourcing to best-cost countries, consolidating our supplier base, and standardizing products to reduce overhead costs and consolidate our operational centers. The successful implementation of our restructuring activities and capacity alignments involves sourcing, logistics, technology, and employment arrangements. Because these restructuring, efficiency, and strategic initiatives and capacity alignments can be complex, difficulties or delays in implementation may occur, or the initiatives and capacity alignments may not be immediately effective, resulting in an adverse material impact on our performance. In addition, there is a risk that inflation, high turnover rates, and increased competition may reduce the efficiencies currently available in best-cost countries to levels that no longer allow for cost-beneficial restructuring opportunities. Therefore, there can be no assurances that any future restructurings or capacity alignments will be completed as planned or will achieve the desired results. See Note 13, Restructuring, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

A prolonged recession and/or a downturn in our industry could result in us having insufficient funds to continue our operations and external financing may not be available to us or available only on materially different terms than what has historically been available

Our ability to generate cash from our operations is highly dependent on automotive sales and LVP, the global economy, and the economies of our important markets. If LVP were to remain on low levels for an extended period of time, we would experience a significantly negative cash flow. Similarly, if cash losses resulting from customer defaults were to rise sharply, we would experience negative cash flow. Such negative cash flow could result in our having insufficient funds to continue our operations unless we can procure external financing, which may not be possible. Our access to debt, securitization, or derivative markets around the world at competitive rates or in sufficient amounts could be affected by credit rating downgrades, market volatility, market disruption, regulatory requirements, or other factors. Our ability to obtain unsecured funding at a reasonable cost is dependent on our credit ratings or our perceived creditworthiness. Our current credit rating could be lowered as a result of us experiencing significant negative cash flows, increasing our indebtedness and leverage, or a dire financial outlook, which may affect our ability to procure financing. We may also for the same, or other reasons, find it difficult to secure new long-term credit facilities, at reasonable terms, when our principal credit facility expires in 2029. Further, even our existing unutilized credit facilities may not be available to us as agreed, or only at additional cost, if participating banks are unable to raise the necessary funds, where, for instance, financial markets are not functioning as expected or one or more banks in our principal credit facility syndicate were to default. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will continue to have sufficient liquidity to meet our operating needs. In the event that we do not have sufficient external financing, we may be required to seek additional capital, sell assets, reduce or cut back our operating activities or otherwise alter our business strategy. Information concerning our credit facilities and other financings is included in Item 7 in this Annual Report in the section headed “Treasury Activities” and in Note 15, Debt and Credit Agreements, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

Our indebtedness may harm our financial condition and operating results

As of December 31, 2025, we have outstanding debt of $2.2 billion. We may incur additional debt for a variety of reasons. Although our significant credit facilities and debt agreements do not have any financial covenants, our level of indebtedness will have several important effects on our future operations, including, without limitation: a portion of our cash flows from operations will be dedicated to the payment of any interest or could be used for amortization required with respect to outstanding indebtedness; increases in our outstanding indebtedness and leverage will increase our vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic and industry conditions, as well as to competitive pressure; depending on the levels of our outstanding debt, our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, acquisitions, capital expenditures, general corporate and other purposes may be limited; and potential future tightening of the availability of capital both from financial institutions and the debt markets may have an adverse effect on our ability to access additional capital.

Governmental restrictions may impact our business adversely

Some of our customers are (or may be) owned by a governmental entity, receive various forms of governmental aid or support, or are subject to governmental influence in other forms, which may impact us as a supplier to these customers. As a result, they may be required to partner with local entities or procure components from local suppliers to achieve a specific local content or be subject to other restrictions regarding localized content or ownership. The nature and form of any such restrictions or protections, whatever their basis, is very difficult to predict as is their potential impact. However, they are likely to be based on political rather than economical or operational considerations and may materially impact our business.

Impairment charges relating to our assets, goodwill and other intangible assets could adversely affect our financial performance

We periodically review the carrying value of our assets, goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment indicators. If one or more of our customers’ facilities cease production or decrease their production volumes, the assets we carry related to our facilities serving such customers may decrease in value because we may no longer be able to utilize or realize them as intended. Where such decreases are significant, such impairments may have a material adverse impact on our financial results. We monitor the various factors that impact the valuation of our goodwill and other intangible assets, including expected future cash flow levels, global economic conditions, market price for our stock, and trends with our customers. Impairment of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets may result from, among other things, deterioration in our performance and especially the cash flow performance of these goodwill assets, adverse market conditions and adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations. If there are changes in these circumstances or the other variables associated with the estimates, judgments and assumptions relating to the valuation of goodwill, when assessing the valuation of our goodwill items, we may determine that it is appropriate to write down a portion of our goodwill or intangible assets and record related non-cash impairment charges. In the event that we determine that we are required to write-down a portion of our goodwill items and other intangible assets and thereby record related non-cash impairment charges, our operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.

We face risks related to our defined benefit pension plans and employee benefit plans, including the need for additional funding as well as higher costs and liabilities

Our defined benefit pension plans and employee benefit plans may require additional funding or give rise to higher related costs and liabilities which, in some circumstances, could reach material amounts and negatively affect our operating results. We are required to make certain year-end assumptions regarding our pension plans. Our pension obligations are dependent on several factors, including factors outside our control such as changes in interest rates, the market performance of the diversified investments underlying the pension plans, actuarial data and adjustments and an increase in the minimum funding requirements or other regulatory changes governing the plans. Adverse equity market conditions and volatility in the credit market may have an unfavorable impact on the value of our pension assets and our future estimated pension liabilities. Internal factors such as an adjustment to the level of benefits provided under the plans may also lead to an increase in our pension liability. If these or other internal and external risks were to occur, alone or in combination, our required contributions to the plans and the costs and net liabilities associated with the plans could increase substantially and have a material effect on our business. Information concerning our benefit plans is included in Note 20, Retirement Plans, of the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

We may not be able to, or we may decide not to, pay dividends or repurchase shares at a level anticipated by our shareholders, which could reduce shareholder returns

The extent to which we pay dividends on our common stock and repurchase our common stock in the future is at the discretion of our Board of Directors and depends upon a number of factors, including our earnings, financial condition, cash and capital needs, indebtedness and leverage, and general economic or business conditions. No assurance can be given that we will be able to or will choose to pay any dividends or repurchase any shares in the foreseeable future.

Cybersecurity incidents or other damage to our technology infrastructure could disrupt business operations, result in the loss of critical and confidential information, and adversely impact our reputation and operating results

We rely extensively on information technology (“IT”) networks and systems, and those of our third-party service providers, and our global data centers and services provided over the internet to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes or activities across our facilities worldwide. The secure operation of our IT networks and systems, and those of our third-party service providers, and the proper processing and maintenance of this information are critical to our business operations. We have been, and likely will continue to be, subject to cyber-attacks. Although we seek to deploy comprehensive security measures to prevent, detect, address and mitigate these threats, there has been an increased level of activity, and an associated level of sophistication, in cyber-attacks against large multinational companies. Threat actors, including nation state attackers, could also use artificial intelligence for malicious purposes, increasing the frequency, velocity, and complexity of their attacks. The ever-evolving threats mean we and our third-party service providers and vendors must continually evaluate and adapt our respective systems and processes and overall security environment, as well as those of any companies we acquire. There is no guarantee that these measures will be fully implemented, complied with, or effective in safeguarding against all data security incidents, system compromises or misuses of data. Our security measures may be compromised due to human or technological error, employee malfeasance, system malfunctions or attacks from uncoordinated individuals or from organized threat actors groups using sophisticated and targeted measures known as advanced persistent threats, directed at us, our products, our customers, our third-party service providers, and/or other entities with whom we do business.

Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until they are launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Disruptions and attacks on our IT systems or the systems of third parties storing our data, or employee malfeasance or human or technological error, could result in the unauthorized access, misappropriation, loss, destruction or corruption of our critical data and confidential or proprietary information, personal information of our employees, our customers’ confidential information, and/or the improper use of our systems and networks, production downtimes and both internal and external supply shortages, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Such disruptions or attacks may also result in the theft of intellectual property or other misappropriation of assets, or otherwise compromise our confidential or proprietary information and materially disrupt our operations. The potential consequences of a material cybersecurity incident include reputational damage, damaged customer relationships, loss of revenue, lower order intake in the future, theft of intellectual property, litigation with third parties, diminution in the value of our investment in research, development and engineering, diversion of the attention of management away from the operation of our business and increased cybersecurity protection and remediation costs, legal claims and liability, regulatory scrutiny, sanctions, fines or penalties (which may not be covered by our insurance policies), negative publicity, release of sensitive and/or confidential information, or increases in operating expenses, which in turn could adversely affect our competitiveness and operating results. To the extent that any disruption or security incident results in an unauthorized access, misappropriation, loss, destruction or corruption of our customer’s information, it could affect our relationships with our customers, create significant expense for us to investigate and remediate any damage, lead to claims against us and ultimately harm our business, strategy, result of operations, or financial condition. In addition, we may be required to incur significant costs to protect against damage caused by these disruptions or security incidents in the future. In the event that our systems, or those of our third-party service providers, are compromised or attacked, we may also suffer an outage, failure, or unavailability of data or information technology systems, and interruptions to our business operations while such incident or attack is being remedied; this may impact data or systems operated by us or by our third-party service providers. In addition, as the regulatory environment related to information security, data collection and use, and privacy becomes increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business, compliance with those requirements could result in additional costs. Furthermore, our technology systems and those of our third-party service providers are vulnerable to damage or interruption from natural disasters, power loss and telecommunication failures. We continuously seek to maintain a robust program of information security and controls, however, any future significant compromise of our data security, whether external or internal, or misuse of customer, associate, supplier or Company data, could result in significant costs, lost sales, fines, lawsuits, and damage to our reputation.

Increasing reliance on artificial intelligence technologies exposes us to operational, cybersecurity, and intellectual property risks

We increasingly utilize artificial intelligence (“AI”) and machine‑learning technologies across various aspects of our manufacturing operations, including quality assurance, predictive maintenance, production automation, and supply‑chain planning. While these technologies are intended to improve efficiency and reduce costs, their deployment introduces significant risks that could adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. AI systems depend on the availability of accurate, comprehensive, and properly structured data. If the data underlying these systems is incomplete, inconsistent, or of poor quality, AI outputs may be unreliable, resulting in inaccurate demand forecasts, flawed inventory or production decisions, or erroneous quality‑control assessments. Such outcomes could disrupt manufacturing, increase costs, and reduce our ability to fulfill customer requirements. Our integration of AI with interconnected operational technology also increases our vulnerability to cybersecurity threats. AI‑enabled systems and Internet‑of‑Things (“IoT”) devices expand the potential attack surface for threat actors, and certain legacy equipment used in our facilities may not have been designed with modern cybersecurity protections. A successful cyberattack on an AI-enabled system could compromise sensitive data, disrupt production processes, damage equipment, or lead to extended downtime. In addition, the use of AI tools may require processing confidential and proprietary manufacturing data. If such data is improperly handled, stored, or transmitted—especially through AI platforms that connect to external networks—there is a heightened risk of inadvertent disclosure or theft of intellectual property, including proprietary production methods, equipment configurations, and process data. Such exposure could erode our competitive advantages. If we fail to implement effective AI governance, risk‑management protocols, cybersecurity controls, or compliance processes, we may be unable to mitigate these risks adequately. Further, the legal and regulatory environment relating to AI is uncertain and rapidly evolving, both in the U.S. and internationally, and includes regulatory schemes targeted specifically at AI as well as provisions in intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection, employment, and other laws applicable to the use of AI. These evolving laws and regulations could require changes in our implementation of AI technology and increase compliance costs and the risk of non-compliance. Any of the foregoing risks, individually or in the aggregate, could materially and adversely affect our operations, reputation, competitive position, and financial performance.

Third parties that maintain certain of our confidential and proprietary information could experience a cybersecurity incident

We rely on third parties to provide or maintain some of our IT systems, data centers and related services and do not exercise direct control over these systems. Despite the implementation of security measures at third party locations, these IT systems, data centers and cloud services are also vulnerable to security incidents or other disruptions. Additionally, we and certain of our third-party service providers collect and store personal information in connection with human resources operations and other aspects of our business. While we obtain assurances that any third parties to whom we provide data will protect this information and, where we deem appropriate, monitor the protections they employ, there remains a risk that the confidentiality and security of data held by us or by third parties may be compromised, exposing us to liability.

Global climate change could negatively affect our business

Public awareness and concern regarding global climate change may result in more regional and/or national requirements to reduce or mitigate the effects of greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, our shareholders and customers may, to varying levels, expect us to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions. Current and any future regulations aimed at mitigating climate change may negatively impact the prices of raw materials and energy, which could impact demand for our products and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. The costs to comply with new or amended laws and violations of these laws, which may result in substantial fines and penalties, remediation costs, third party damages, or a suspension or cessation of our operations, may be significant. The manifestations of climate change, such as extreme weather conditions or more frequent extreme weather events, including wildfires, flooding, water stress and extreme heat, could also disrupt our operations, damage our facilities, disrupt our supply chain, including our customers or suppliers, impact the availability and cost of materials needed for manufacturing or increase insurance and other operating costs. As a result, severe weather or a natural disaster that results in a prolonged disruption to our operations, or the operations of our customers or suppliers, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition.

Our goals, targets, and ambitions related to sustainability and emissions reduction, and our public statements and disclosures regarding them, may, from time to time, result in additional considerations or expectations and expose us to risks

We have developed, and will continue to develop and set, goals, targets, ambitions and other objectives related to sustainability matters, including our net-zero emission targets both for ourselves and our supply chain. Some of these are based on our internal scenario analysis, which may not prove to be accurate and carries inherent uncertainties. Statements related to these goals, targets, ambitions and objectives reflect our current plans and do not constitute a guarantee that they will be achieved. Our efforts to research, establish, accomplish, and accurately report on these goals, targets, and objectives expose us to operational, reputational, financial, legal, and other risks. Additionally, there can be no assurance that we will be able to secure pricing from our customers that reflects any increased costs of developing and manufacturing sustainable products. If we are unable to recover these costs, our business, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Greenhouse gas emissions, particular emissions that come from individuals and entities up and down the value chain (otherwise known as Scope 3 emissions), are very difficult to estimate and our estimates may be materially different than actual emissions. The manner in which we estimate and disclose Scope 3 emissions may differ from other companies and may be different than future regulatory requirements, and currently, we do not include downstream Scope 3 emissions in our targets and ambitions. If future governmental regulations require us to modify the basis of our Scope 3 emissions disclosure, our historically disclosed Scope 3 emissions may change materially. Our ability to achieve any stated goal, target, ambition or objective, including with respect to emissions reduction, is subject to numerous factors and conditions, some of which are outside of our control.

Our business may face increased interest from investors and other stakeholders related to our sustainability initiatives, including the goals, targets, and objectives that we announce, and our methodologies and timelines for pursuing them. Failure or perceived failure to pursue or fulfill such initiatives could adversely affect our business or reputation, as well as expose us to government enforcement actions and private litigation.

RISKS RELATED TO INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS

Our business is exposed to risks inherent in international operations

We currently conduct operations in various countries and jurisdictions, including locating certain of our manufacturing and distribution facilities internationally, which subjects us to the legal, political, regulatory and social requirements and economic conditions in these jurisdictions. Some of these countries are considered growth markets and emerging markets. International sales and operations, especially in growth markets, subject us to certain risks inherent in doing business abroad, including: exposure to local economic conditions; unexpected changes in laws, regulations, trade, or monetary or fiscal policy, including interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and changes in inflation rates; foreign tax consequences; inability to collect, or delays in collecting, value-added taxes and/or other receivables associated with remittances and other payments by subsidiaries; exposure to local political turmoil and challenging labor conditions; changes in general economic and political conditions in countries where we operate, particularly in emerging markets; expropriation and nationalization; enforcing legal agreements or collecting receivables through foreign legal systems; wage inflation; currency controls, including lack of liquidity in foreign currency due to governmental restrictions, trade protection policies and currency controls, which may create difficulty in repatriating profits or making other remittances; compliance with the requirements of an increasing body of applicable anti-bribery laws; reduced intellectual property protection in various markets; investment restrictions or requirements; the imposition of tariffs and duties, and the burden of complying with a wide variety of international and U.S. export control and economic sanctions laws. We are subject to taxation in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) continues its base erosion and profit shifting (“BEPS”) project begun in 2015 with new proposals for a global minimum tax, further development of a coordinated set of rules for taxation and the allocation of taxing rights between jurisdictions. These proposals, if adopted by countries in which we operate, could result in changes to tax policies, including transfer pricing policies, which could ultimately impact our tax liabilities.

Changes in tax laws or policies by the U.S. or foreign jurisdictions could result in a higher effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings, and any such change could have a material adverse effect on our business , operating results, cash flows, and financial condition.

Our international operations also depend upon trade relations between the countries where we manufacture and sell products and those countries in which our customers and suppliers have operations. The current U.S. presidential administration has created uncertainty about the relationships between the U.S. and certain of its trading partners, including with respect to the trade policies and agreements, treaties, government regulations, and the tariffs that apply to trade between the U.S. and other nations. For example, in 2025 the U.S. administration imposed tariffs affecting imports to the U.S. from nearly every country by executive action adopted and modified without predictable timelines, creating increased operational and financial exposure for companies dependent on cross-border trade. Other countries, including China, responded with retaliatory tariffs or, like the European Union, announced it is considering retaliatory tariffs.

Changes in national policy, other governmental action related to tariffs or international trade agreements, changes in social, political regulatory, and economic conditions or in laws and policies governing foreign trade, manufacturing, development and investment in the territories and countries where we currently manufacture and sell products, as well as any resulting negative sentiments towards us as a result of such changes could depress economic activity, restrict our access to suppliers or customers, and have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition.

Increasing our manufacturing footprint in the growth markets and our business relationships with automotive manufacturers in these markets are particularly important elements of our strategy. As a result, our exposure to the risks described above may be greater in the future, and our exposure to risks associated with developing countries, such as the risk of political upheaval and reliability of local infrastructure, may increase. It could also impact importing certain foreign-produced vehicles into the U.S. Changes in national policy or continued uncertainty could depress economic activity and restrict our access to suppliers or customers and have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition. Additionally, trade restrictions or material increases in tariffs could impact our targets, earnings guidance, and estimates. The ultimate impact of any tariffs, including any related responses, are uncertain and will depend on various factors, including the timing of implementation, and the amount, scope, and nature of the tariffs. Any or all of these actions could adversely affect our business, financial condition and cash flows.

Tariffs, sanctions, and geopolitical conflicts may disrupt our multi‑tier automotive supply chain, constrain access to critical components, and adversely affect our production capabilities and financial performance

Our operations rely on a geographically distributed, multi‑tier supply chain structure that makes us acutely sensitive to shifts in global trade policy, export‑control regimes, and geopolitical conflict. Recent U.S. trade actions affecting imports from major automotive manufacturing hubs—including broad, rapidly shifting tariff frameworks and sector‑specific levies—have increased global cost volatility and introduced uncertainty regarding long‑term sourcing strategies. Wide‑ranging tariff escalation across key trade partners has reshaped global trade flows and imposed substantial cost burdens on manufacturers dependent on cross‑border supply chains. Such measures can directly affect our ability to procure components and precision‑machined parts at competitive prices. These increased input costs may not be fully recoverable through pricing, particularly under fixed‑price or lifetime‑pricing automotive supply agreements. Semiconductor and sensor sourcing relies heavily on global electronics supply chains, which are increasingly affected by export controls, entity‑list restrictions, and sanctions targeting technology supply routes. Expanding U.S. and international restrictions on transfers of semiconductors and related technologies—such as licensing requirements for chip exports to certain entities—have already produced material disruptions and revenue impacts within the broader electronics ecosystem. If our Tier‑1 or Tier‑2 suppliers lose access to critical silicon or manufacturing equipment due to export controls or sanctions, we may face prolonged allocation constraints, extended lead times, or forced redesigns. Military conflicts routinely create systemic disruptions across global automotive supply chains. They may block critical choke points, destabilize upstream manufacturing regions, or restrict access to raw materials such as aluminum, nickel, palladium, and specialized production sourced from conflict‑affected areas. A significant proportion of global enterprises have experienced conflict‑driven disruptions, with impacts concentrated in logistics paralysis, supplier instability, and escalating compliance obligations. State‑based armed conflict is also identified as one of the most immediate global risks to supply chain continuity, threatening transportation corridors, energy markets, and manufacturing hubs essential to the automotive sector. Many of these geopolitical and regulatory shocks originate deep within Tier‑2, Tier‑3, or Tier‑N suppliers of rare‑earth magnets and critical minerals. Because sub‑tier suppliers are often located in high‑risk regions or depend on fragile logistics networks, disruptions—whether due to conflict, export controls, sanctions, or other regulatory actions—may propagate upstream before detection. A substantial portion of global supply chain disruptions originate at these deeper tiers, underscoring the structural risk inherent in automotive supply networks with limited transparency below Tier‑1. Any combination of tariff escalation, sanctions, or military conflict may: reduce availability of critical electronic and mechanical components; necessitate redesigns of products due to unavailable semiconductors or restricted materials; increase logistics costs through rerouted shipments or loss of air/sea corridors; force production slowdowns or stoppages at our facilities or those of our OEM customers; require emergency multi‑sourcing, localized manufacturing transitions, or new supplier qualifications that extend program timing. Because automotive supply contracts typically impose strict delivery, quality, and cost‑reduction obligations, disruptions of this nature could materially affect our business, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition. We may also incur higher safety‑stock requirements, expedited freight costs, or capital expenditures to re‑engineer systems or tool new suppliers. As geopolitical conditions evolve, we cannot ensure that our mitigation strategies—including dual sourcing, buffer inventories, and supplier diversification—will fully offset the operational and financial impacts of these events.

Significant changes in the United States Mexico Canada Agreement ("USMCA") could adversely affect our financial performance

The U.S., Mexico and Canada entered into the USMCA, a successor to the North American Free Trade Agreement, effective as of July 1, 2020. The USMCA changed the automotive rules of origin that dictate what percentage of an automobile must be built from parts that originated from countries in the USMCA territory. The rules require that at least 75% of parts be made in North America and that 40-45% of an automobile must be made by workers earning at least $16 an hour. Reflective of the automotive industry, our vehicle parts manufacturing facilities in the U.S., Mexico and Canada are highly dependent on duty-free trade amongst the U.S., Mexico, and Canada. The criticality of USMCA eligibility of products involved in such trade has increased significantly as a result of the exemption such eligibility currently affords from additional tariffs imposed against Canada and Mexico by executive orders in 2025. The USMCA is undergoing a joint review in 2026. If the USMCA is terminated, or otherwise substantially amended, it could have a material adverse impact on our financial performance. The imposition of customs duties on imports into the U.S., Mexico, or Canada could negatively impact our financial performance.

Our foreign operations may subject us to risks relating to laws governing international relations

Due to our global operations, we are subject to many laws governing international relations (including, but not limited to, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and other anti-bribery regulations in foreign jurisdictions where we do business), which prohibit improper payments to government officials and restrict where and how we can do business, what information or products we can supply to certain countries and what information we can provide to governmental authorities. We also export components and products that are subject to certain U.S. trade regulations, including the U.S. Export Administration Regulations and various economic sanctions programs administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. Although we have procedures and policies in place that should mitigate the risk of violating these laws, there is no guarantee that they will be sufficiently effective. If and when we acquire new businesses, we may not be able to ensure that the pre-existing controls and procedures meant to prevent violations of these laws were effective, and violations may occur if we are unable to timely implement corrective and effective controls and procedures when integrating newly acquired businesses. Any allegations of noncompliance with these laws could harm our reputation, divert management attention and result in significant expenses, and could therefore materially harm our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Our business in Asia is subject to aggressive competition and is sensitive to economic, market, and political conditions

We operate in the automotive supply market throughout Asia including the highly competitive markets in China, South Korea, and India. In each of these markets we face competition from both international and smaller domestic manufacturers. Due to the significance of the Asian markets for our profit and growth, we are exposed to risks in China, South Korea, and India. We anticipate that additional competitors, both international and domestic, may seek to enter the Chinese, South Korean, and/or Indian markets resulting in increased competition. Increased competition may result in lower sales volumes, price reductions, reduced margins and our inability to gain or hold market share. There have been periods of increased market volatility and moderation in the levels of economic growth in China, which resulted in periods of lower automotive production growth rates in China than those previously experienced. Our business in Asia is sensitive to economic and market conditions that drive automotive sales volumes in China, South Korea, and India and may be impacted if there are reductions in vehicle demand in those markets. If we are unable to maintain our position in the Asian markets, the pace of growth slows, or vehicle sales in these markets decrease, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Global integration may result in additional risks

Because of our efforts to manage costs by integrating our operations globally, we face the additional risk that, should any of the other risks discussed herein materialize, the negative effects could be more pronounced. For example, while supply delays of a component have typically only affected a few customer vehicle models, such a delay could now affect several vehicle models of several customers in several geographic areas. Similarly, any recall or warranty issue we face due to a product defect or failure is now more likely to involve a larger number of units in several geographic areas.

Our business faces exchange rate risks

As a result of our global presence, a significant portion of our revenues and expenses are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We are therefore subject to foreign currency risks and foreign exchange exposure. Such risks and exposures include: transaction exposure, which arises because the cost of a product originates in one currency and the product is sold in another currency; revaluation effects, which arise from valuation of assets denominated in other currencies than the reporting currency of each unit; translation exposure in the income statement, which arises when the income statements of non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars; translation exposure in the balance sheet, which arises when the balance sheets of non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars; and changes in the reported U.S. dollar amounts of cash flows. We cannot predict exchange rate volatility or the extent of its impact on our future financial results. We typically denominate foreign transactions in foreign currencies to achieve a natural hedge. However, a natural hedge cannot be achieved for all our currency flows; therefore, a net transaction exposure remains within the group. The net exposure can be significant and creates a transaction exposure risk for us. We do not hedge translation exposure. However, we do engage in foreign exchange rate hedging from time to time related to foreign currency transactions. For additional information, see Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk - Currency risks.

RISKS RELATED TO ACQUISITIONS

We face risks in connection with acquisitions, joint ventures, partnerships, and other strategic transactions

Our growth has been enhanced through strategic transactions, including acquisitions of businesses, products and technologies, partnerships, strategic alliances, and joint development agreements that we believe will complement our business. We regularly evaluate acquisition opportunities, frequently engage in acquisition discussions, conduct due diligence activities in connection with possible acquisitions, and, where appropriate, engage in acquisition negotiations. We may not be able to successfully identify suitable acquisition and joint venture candidates or complete transactions on acceptable terms, integrate acquired operations into our existing operations or expand into new markets. Our failure to identify suitable strategic transactions may restrict our ability to grow our business. These strategic transactions also involve numerous additional risks to us and our investors, including: risks related to retaining acquired management and employees; difficulties in integrating acquired technologies, products, operations, services and personnel with our existing businesses; diversion of our management’s attention from other business concerns; assumption of contingent liabilities; potential adverse financial impacts, including from the amortization of expenses related to intangible assets and from potential impairment of goodwill; incurrence of indebtedness; and potential damage to existing customer relationships or lack of customer acceptance or inability to attract new customers as a result of these transactions. In the future, we may pursue acquisitions of businesses or products that are complementary to our business but for which we have historically had little or no direct experience. These transactions can involve significant challenges and risks as well as significant time and resources that may divert management’s attention from other business activities. If we fail to adequately manage these risks, the acquisitions and other strategic transactions may not result in revenue growth, operational synergies or service or technology enhancements, which could adversely affect our financial condition.

RISKS RELATED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

If our patents are declared invalid or our technology infringes on the proprietary rights of others, our ability to compete may be impaired

We have developed a considerable amount of proprietary technology related to automotive safety systems and rely on a number of patents to protect such technology. Our intellectual property plays an important role in maintaining our competitive position in a number of the markets we serve. At present, we hold more than 6,600 patents and patent applications covering a large number of innovations and product ideas, mainly in the fields of seatbelt and airbag technologies. In addition to our in-house research and development efforts, we seek to acquire rights to new intellectual property through corporate acquisitions, asset acquisitions, licensing and joint venture arrangements. Our patents and licenses expire on various dates during the period from 2026 to 2045. We do not expect the expiration of any single patent or license to have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Developments or assertions by or against us relating to intellectual property rights could negatively impact our business. We primarily protect our innovations with patents and vigorously protect and defend our patents, trademarks and know-how against infringement and unauthorized use. If we are not able to protect our intellectual property and our proprietary rights and technology, we could lose those rights and incur substantial costs policing and defending those rights. We also generate license revenue from these patents, which we may lose if we do not adequately protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights. Our means of protecting our intellectual property, proprietary rights and technology may not be adequate, and our competitors may independently develop technologies that are similar or superior to our proprietary technologies, duplicate our technologies, or design around the patents we own or license. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as the laws of the U.S. and we may encounter significant problems in protecting and defending our intellectual property rights in certain foreign jurisdictions. This could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or misappropriation of our other intellectual property rights. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business. Accordingly, our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights in such countries may be inadequate.

We may not be able to protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property rights, which could result in the loss of our rights or increased costs

Although we believe that our products and technology do not infringe the proprietary rights of others, third parties may assert infringement claims against us in the future. Additionally, we license proprietary technology, from third parties, which is covered by patents, and we cannot be certain that any such patents will not be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented. Such licenses may also be non-exclusive, meaning our competition may also be able to access such technology. Further, we expect to continue to expand our products and services and expand into new businesses, including through developing new products, acquisitions, joint ventures and joint development agreements, which could increase our exposure to patent and other intellectual property claims from competitors and other parties. If claims alleging patent, copyright or trademark infringement are brought against us and are successfully prosecuted against us, they could result in substantial costs. If a successful claim is made against us and we fail to develop non-infringing technology, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, certain of our products utilize components that are developed by third parties and licensed to us. If claims alleging patent, copyright or trademark infringement are brought against such licensors and successfully prosecuted, they could result in substantial costs, and we may not be able to replace the functions provided by these licensors. Alternate sources for the technology currently licensed to us may not be available in a timely manner, may not provide the same functions as currently provided or may be more expensive than products currently used. We may develop proprietary information through our in-house research and development efforts, consulting arrangements or research collaborations with other entities or organizations. We may seek to protect this proprietary information by entering into confidentiality agreements or consulting, services or employment agreements that contain non-disclosure and non-use provisions with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors and other third parties. However, we may fail to enter into the necessary agreements, and even if entered into, these agreements may be breached or may otherwise fail to prevent disclosure, third-party infringement or misappropriation of our proprietary information.

We may not be able to respond quickly enough to changes in technology and technological risks and to develop our intellectual property into commercially viable products

Changes in legislative, regulatory, or industry requirements or in competitive technologies may render certain of our products obsolete or less attractive to our customers. We currently license certain proprietary technology to third parties and, if such technology becomes obsolete or less attractive, those licensees could terminate our license agreements, which could adversely affect our operating results. Our ability to anticipate changes in technology and regulatory standards and to successfully develop and introduce new and enhanced products on a timely basis will be a significant factor in our ability to remain competitive. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to achieve the technological advances that may be necessary for us to remain competitive or that certain of our products will not become obsolete. We are also subject to the risks generally associated with new product introductions and applications, including lack of market acceptance, delays in product development and failure of products to operate properly. As part of our business strategy, we may from time to time seek to acquire businesses or assets that provide us with additional intellectual property. We may experience problems integrating acquired technologies into our existing technologies and products, and such acquired intellectual property may be subject to known or contingent liabilities such as infringement claims.

Some of our products and technologies may use “open source” software, which may restrict how we use or distribute our products or require that we release the source code of certain products subject to those licenses

Some of our products and technologies may incorporate software licensed under so-called “open source” licenses. In addition to risks related to license requirements, usage of open source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software, as open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on origin of the software. Additionally, open source licenses typically require that source code subject to the license be made available to the public and that any modifications or derivative works to open source software continue to be licensed under open source licenses. These open source licenses typically mandate that proprietary software, when combined in specific ways with open source software, become subject to the open source license. If we combine our proprietary software in such ways with open source software, we could be required to release the source code of our proprietary software. We take steps to ensure that our proprietary software is not combined with, and does not incorporate, open source software in ways that would require our proprietary software to be subject to an open source license. However, few courts have interpreted open source licenses; therefore, the way these licenses may be interpreted and enforced is subject to some uncertainty.

RISKS RELATED TO GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS AND TAXES

Our business may be adversely affected by laws or regulations, including environmental, occupational health and safety, and other governmental regulations

We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations, including those related to environmental, occupational health and safety, financial, and other requirements. We cannot predict the substance or impact of pending or future legislation or regulations, or the application thereof. The introduction of new laws or regulations, changes in existing laws or regulations, or changes in their interpretations, could increase the costs of doing business for us, our customers, or our suppliers, or restrict our actions and adversely affect our business, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition. Our operations are subject to environmental and safety laws and regulations governing, among other things, emissions to air, discharges to waters and the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste and other materials. Operating automotive parts manufacturing facilities entails risks in these areas, and we cannot assure that we will not incur material costs or liabilities as a result. Additionally, environmental laws, regulations, and permits and the enforcement thereof change frequently and have tended to become increasingly stringent over time, which may necessitate substantial capital expenditures or operating costs or require changes of production processes. Although we have no known pending material environmental issues, there is no assurance that we will not be adversely impacted by environmental costs, liabilities, or claims in the future, whether under existing laws and regulations or those adopted or imposed in the future. Our costs, liabilities, and obligations relating to environmental matters may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition. Our facilities in the U.S. are subject to regulation by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”), which oversees the protection of worker health and safety. In addition, the OSHA hazard communication standard requires us to maintain information about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations and to provide this information to employees, state and local governmental authorities and residents. We are also subject to occupational safety regulations in other countries. Our failure to comply with government occupational safety regulations, including OSHA requirements, or general industry standards relating to employee health and safety, recordkeeping, or monitoring occupational exposure to regulated substances could expose us to liability, enforcement actions, fines and penalties, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows, and financial condition. Although we employ safety procedures in the design and operation of our facilities, there is a risk that an accident or injury to one of our employees could occur in one of our facilities. Any accident or injury to our employees could result in litigation, manufacturing delays and harm to our reputation, which could negatively affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Our business may be adversely affected by changes in automotive safety regulations or concerns that drive further regulation of the automobile safety market

Government vehicle safety regulations are a key driver in our business. Historically, these regulations have imposed increasingly stringent safety requirements for vehicles. Such regulations have a positive impact on driver awareness and acceptance of automotive safety products and technology. More stringent safety regulations often require vehicles to include more safety CPV and more advanced safety products, which has been a driver of growth in our business. However, these regulations are subject to change based on a number of factors outside our control, including new scientific or medical data, adverse publicity regarding the industry recalls and safety risks associated with airbags or seatbelts (for example, risks to children and small adults), domestic and foreign political developments or considerations, and litigation relating to our products and our competitors’ products. Changes in government regulations in response to these and other factors could have a severe impact on our business. Although we believe that safety will continue to be a regulatory priority over time, if government priorities shift and we are unable to adapt to changing regulations, our business may suffer material adverse effects. Our regulatory obligations could increase as federal and local regulators impose more stringent compliance and reporting requirements in response to product recalls and safety issues in our industry. We are subject to existing stringent requirements under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 (the “Vehicle Safety Act”), including a duty to report safety defects with our products, subject to strict timing requirements. The Vehicle Safety Act imposes potentially significant civil penalties for violations, including the failure to comply with such reporting obligations. We are also subject to the existing U.S. Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation (“TREAD”) Act, which requires equipment manufacturers, such as Autoliv, to comply with “Early Warning” reporting requirements by providing NHTSA with certain information, including information related to defects or reports of injury related to our products. The TREAD Act imposes criminal liability for violations if a defect subsequently causes death or bodily injury. In addition, the Vehicle Safety Act authorizes NHTSA to require a manufacturer to recall and repair vehicles that contain safety defects or fail to comply with U.S. federal motor vehicle safety standards. Sales into foreign countries may be subject to similar regulations. Due to the record recall of airbag inflators of one of our competitors, NHTSA has become more active in requesting information from suppliers and vehicle manufactures regarding potential product defects.

Negative or unexpected tax developments could adversely affect our effective tax rate, operating results and financial condition

Changes in, or changes in the application of, U.S. or foreign tax laws, regulations or accounting principles with respect to matters such as tax base, tax rates, transfer pricing, dividends and restrictions on certain forms of tax relief or limitations on favorable tax treatment could affect the calculation of our income taxes and other tax liabilities, our effective tax rate, and the carrying value of our deferred tax assets. Our annual tax rate is based on our income and the tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Because of our global operations we face uncertainties and judgments in the application of complex tax regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions. Significant judgment and estimation are required in determining our effective tax rate and in evaluating our tax positions, in many cases where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Although we believe that our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of our tax liability may be different from what is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. We are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world and in a number of jurisdictions, we are currently under examination, which inherently creates uncertainty. Although we periodically assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes, negative or unexpected results from one or more of such reviews and audits, including any related interest or penalties imposed by governmental authorities, could increase our effective tax rate and adversely impact our operating results, cash flows, and financial condition. For example, we are currently in the early stages of a dispute with the Mexican tax authorities in relation to various issues dealing with certain manufacturing activities that occur in Mexico. An adverse result in this or other similar disputes could have a materially negative impact on our financial results. The effective tax rates used for interim reporting are based on our projected full-year geographic earnings mix and take into account projected tax costs on intercompany dividends from lower tier subsidiaries. Changes in currency exchange rates, earnings mix among taxing jurisdictions, or the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends could impact our reported effective tax rates, or cause fluctuations in the tax rate from quarter to quarter. Certain anti-trust judgments or settlements may not be tax deductible, which could have a material negative impact to our annual tax rate. A number of other factors may also increase our effective tax rate, which could have an adverse impact on our profitability and operating results. Due to our numerous foreign operations, our tax rate may be impacted by our global mix of earnings if our pre-tax income is lower than anticipated in countries with lower statutory tax rates and/or is higher than anticipated in countries with higher statutory tax rates. Based on U.S. GAAP, we do not record current or deferred tax liabilities on permanent investments in our foreign subsidiaries. See Note 5, Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

We may not be able to fully realize our deferred tax assets

We currently carry deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances, resulting from deductible temporary differences and tax loss carry-forwards, both of which will reduce taxable income in the future. However, deferred tax assets may only be realized against taxable income. The amount of our deferred tax assets could be reduced, from time to time, due to adverse changes in our operations or in estimates of future taxable income from operations during the carry-forward period as a result of a deterioration in market conditions or other circumstances. Any such reduction would adversely affect our income in the period of the adjustment. Additional information on our deferred tax assets is included in Note 5, Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments Autoliv maintains a cybersecurity program designed to identify, assess, manage, mitigate, and respond to cybersecurity threats as an integrated part of the Company’s overall operations.

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties

Autoliv’s principal executive offices are located at Klarabergsviadukten 70, Section D5, SE-111 64, Stockholm, Sweden. Autoliv’s various businesses operate in a number of production facilities and offices. Autoliv believes that its properties are adequately maintained and suitable for their intended use and that the Company’s production facilities have adequate capacity for the Company’s current and foreseeable needs. All of Autoliv’s production facilities and offices are owned or leased by operating (either subsidiary or joint venture) companies.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company is subject to legal proceedings brought by or against the Company and its subsidiaries.

See Note 19, Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report for a summary of certain ongoing legal proceedings. Such information is incorporated into this Part I, Item 3 – “Legal Proceedings” by reference.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Item 5.

Not applicable.

PART II

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Shareholder information

The primary exchange market for Autoliv’s securities is the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) where Autoliv’s common stock trades under the symbol “ALV”. Autoliv’s Swedish Depositary Receipts (SDRs) are traded on NASDAQ Stockholm under the symbol “ALIV SDB”. Options in SDRs trade on Nasdaq Stockholm under the name “Autoliv SDB”. Options in Autoliv shares are traded on NASDAQ OMX PHLX and on NYSE Amex Options under the symbol “ALV”.

Stock Performance Graph

The graph and table below show the cumulative total shareholder return for our common stock since December 31, 2020. The graph compares our performance to that of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index (S&P 500) and the Dow Jones US Auto Parts Index.

The comparison assumes $100 was invested at the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2020. Each of the returns shown assumes that all dividends paid were reinvested.

Number of shares

As of December 31, 2025, the number of shares of common stock outstanding, net of treasury shares, was 74.7 million, compared to 77.7 million as of December 31, 2024. The Company repurchased and immediately retired approximately 3.1 million shares during 2025.

During 2025, the weighted average number of shares outstanding (excluding dilution and treasury shares) decreased to 76.6 million from 80.2 million in 2024. Assuming dilution, the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the full year 2025 decreased to 76.9 million from 80.4 million in 2024.

Granted Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) and Performance Share Units (PSUs) could increase the number of shares outstanding as of December 31, 2025 by 0.6 million shares in the aggregate. Combined, this would add 0.8% to the number of shares outstanding as of December 31, 2025.

On December 31, 2025, the Company had 2.6 million treasury shares compared to 2.7 million as of December 31, 2024.

Shareholders

As of February 13, 2026, there were 1,116 holders of record of our common stock. Many stockholders choose to own shares through brokerage accounts and other intermediaries rather than as holders of record (excluding individual participants in securities positions listing) so the actual number of stockholders is unknown but significantly higher.

Dividends

Autoliv has a history of paying quarterly cash dividends. Declared dividends are announced in press releases and published on Autoliv’s corporate website. The Board of Directors revisits dividends on a quarterly basis. There can be no assurance that the Board of Directors will declare dividends in the future. See Autoliv’s corporate website for additional details regarding historical dividends.

Stock incentive plan

Autoliv employees participate in the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Stock Incentive Plan”) and receive Autoliv stock-based awards from time to time. Additional information regarding the securities authorized for issuance under the Stock Incentive Plan is included in Item 12 of this Annual Report.

Autoliv has adopted a Stock Ownership Policy for Executives requiring the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to accumulate and hold the number of Autoliv shares having a value of twice his annual base salary. For other executives, the minimum requirement is, over time, a holding equal to each executive’s annual base salary.

Stock repurchase program

The following table provides information with respect to common stock repurchases by the Company during the three months period ended December 31, 2025 on NYSE.

Item 6. [RESERVED]

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

IMPORTANT TRENDS

The discussions and analysis in this section are focused on the Company’s results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Discussions of the Company's results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023 can be found in Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, which was filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on February 20, 2025.

Autoliv, Inc. (the “Company”) provides automotive safety systems to the automotive industry with a broad range of product offerings, primarily passive safety systems. In the year ended December 31, 2025, a number of factors influenced the Company’s results of operations, including:

1) Reported figures impacted by costs for capacity alignments and antitrust related matters. See section Items affecting comparability and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

2) Net of treasury shares.

GEOPOLITICAL UNCERTAINTIES AND TARIFFS

2025 saw global LVP increase by around 3.9% (according to S&P Global January 2026). Our sales to customers are based on production schedule order quantities and delivery dates that are communicated to us by our customers, which we refer to as “call-off” plans. Despite industry challenges such as chip shortages related to the Nexperia situation and the tariffs imposed in the beginning of 2025, which caused uncertainties regarding costs in the industry, we saw an improvement in call-off volatility in 2025. This improvement supported our improvement in operating efficiency and productivity, including a reduction in direct workforce. However, customer call-off volatility increased in the fourth quarter and remained higher than pre-pandemic levels, and low customer demand visibility and changes to customer call-offs with short notice still had a negative impact on our production efficiency and profitability.

The effects of the new tariffs imposed in 2025 did not have a significant impact on our profitability in 2025, as we achieved customer compensations for more than 80% of tariff costs. Including the dilutive effect of recovered tariffs, operating margin was negatively impacted by around 20 bps. While it is our ambition and expectation to continue passing tariff costs on to our customers, there is significant uncertainty as future recovery levels may vary. Geopolitical developments and the evolving trade environment are likely to continue creating a challenging and unpredictable operating landscape. Any new, increased or modified tariffs or other trade restrictions could materially affect our operations, customer relationships or cost recovery ability as well as contribute to the uncertainty of industry expectations. We continue to closely monitor the tariff policy environment and remain prepared to be agile to adjust our commercial and operational responses to any such developments.

INFLATION

Cost pressures from labor, in our own operations and related to our suppliers' labor costs, had a negative impact on our profitability in 2025. Most of the inflationary cost pressure was offset by customer price and other compensations. Changes in raw material costs had a limited impact on our profitability in 2025. The Company expects limited raw material price impact also in 2026. We also expect continued cost pressure from inflation relating mainly to labor, including increased labor costs for our suppliers, especially in Europe and the Americas. The Company continues to execute on productivity and cost reduction activities to offset these cost pressures, and we continue to seek inflation compensation from our customers. The continued uncertainty regarding the effects of tariffs and trade restrictions may lead to a more adverse inflation environment.

GROWTH IMPACTED BY LIGHT VEHICLE PRODUCTION, SHIFTING OEM LANDSCAPE AND SAFETY CONTENT PER VEHICLE

The most important driver for Autoliv’s sales is the LVP. In 2025, global LVP grew by 3.9%.

The increase in LVP in China of 10% was significantly more than what was expected in the beginning of the year, driven mainly by a multitude of successful launches of new models by domestic Chinese OEMs and in particular by increased exports, mainly to Asian markets. The LVP decline of 1.0% in Europe was impacted by affordability issues and technology uncertainties. The LVP decline of 0.5% in North America was impacted by the EV market development, U.S. tariffs and growing consumer uncertainty, Japan increased by 1.8%, mainly impacted by domestic demand and US exports, supplemented by Japanese OEM production repatriation. LVP in India increased by 7.4%, driven by reduced sales tax on cars and multiple new model launches.

The different LVP growth rates for different regions in 2025 was dilutive to global safety content per vehicle (CPV), as LVP in several high CPV regions declined while LVP increased in some lower CPV regions. The highest CPV region is North America, and its share of global LVP declined by 0.5pp to 15.5%. The second highest CPV region is Europe, and its share of global LVP declined by 1.0pp, to 18.7%. India, a major region with the lowest CPV, which saw its share of LVP increase from 6.5% to 6.7%. CPV in China is below the global average, and China’s share of global LVP increased from 33.7% to 35.7%. Japan’s share decreased to 8.7% from 8.9%. Additional dilution to global CPV came from the difference in growth within China, where lower CPV models and segments grew strongly while higher CPV models and segments growth was limited or negative. LVP growth for Domestic Chinese OEMs with typically lower CPV was 16% compared to global OEMs with typically higher CPV saw LVP decline by 1.3%. Combined with the regional growth differences, we estimate this shift in LVP mix contributed negatively to our sales growth by between 2 to 3 pp. The Company estimates that its global market share was unchanged at around 44% in 2025 compared to 2024.

The strong growth of Chinese OEMs' LVP in both domestic and export markets is a trend the Company expects to continue. It is therefore instrumental to have a solid position with this customer category. Over the past few years, the Company has taken significant steps to strengthen its position with Chinese OEMs through investments in manufacturing and R,D&E capacities, as well as by signing several strategic co-operation agreements with Chinese OEMs. These efforts have supported an improved performance, as shown by a strong order intake, with 30% of the Company's total order intake value in 2025 coming from Chinese OEMs. Additionally, the Company's sales to Chinese OEMs grew by 23% in 2025.

Another important market trend is the rapid growth of the automotive market in India. In recent years, India's significance for the automotive industry has increased substantially. In 2025, LVP in India represented 6.7% of global LVP. As safety content per vehicle has also grown rapidly over the past few years, India's importance for the Company has risen from around 2% of total sales in 2020 to 5% in 2025. Through timely investments in capacity for both manufacturing and R, D&E, the Company is the clear market leader in India.

Despite macro-economic uncertainties in parts of the world, we expect light vehicle markets to grow both in the medium and long term, driven by pent-up end user demand and a growing GDP/capita.

Due to more stringent crash test rating requirements by institutes such as Euro NCAP, increased government regulations and increasing consumer demand for more safety in emerging markets, the Company sees vehicle manufacturers installing more airbags and more advanced seatbelt systems in vehicles. This generally takes place when new models are introduced. The safety standards of vehicles are increasing in China, India, and other growth markets, partially due to new government regulations and crash test rating programs. This is supporting higher installation rates of airbags and more advanced seatbelts, impacting CPV positively. Commercial customer recoveries compensating for increased labor costs and tariffs also added to CPV in 2025, partly offset by negative effects from continued productivity related pricing pressure from vehicle manufacturers. CPV increased in India, South America, South Korea, Europe and North America, was unchanged in Japan and China and decreased in Other Asia. The changes in regional and model mix diluted global CPV by 2 to 3pp leading to a global CPV that was unchanged compared to 2024. This contributed to an organic growth (Non-GAAP measure) of around 3.4% compared to global LVP growth of around 3.9%. The average global safety CPV (airbags, pedestrian safety, seatbelts, and steering wheels) amounted to around $268 in 2025.

The Company believes that the more stringent crash rating requirements and consumer demand for more safety should enable the global automotive safety market to grow around 1-2 percentage points per year faster than the global LVP in the medium and long term. This excludes the impact from cost inflation related price increases.

The past several years’ high order intake share has supported a strong sales development over time. In the past 5 years, the Company's organic sales development outpaced global LVP on average by around 4.3 percentage points. During 2025, growth was positively affected through recent launches of several new models, including Honda Passport, Ford Expedition, Hyundai Palisade, Onvo L90, Mercedes CLA, Citroen C3 Aircross and Opel Frontera.

The Company estimates that the sales for Electric Vehicles (not including PHEVs) amounted to around $1.7 billion in 2025.

GLOBAL FOOTPRINT WELL ADAPTED TO THE GEOGRAPHIC TREND SHIFT IN AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTION

The Company's regional sales mix continues to be balanced with 29% of sales in Europe, 32% in the Americas and 20% in Asia, excluding China in 2025, compared to 28%, 33% and 19%, respectively, in 2024. The Company's sales in the important Chinese market was 19% of total sales in 2025 compared to 19% in 2024.

The balanced regional sales mix has been achieved through timely investments and strengthening of technical and support capabilities in growth markets.

ORDER INTAKE IMPACTED BY SHIFTS IN TECHNOLOGY, CUSTOMER LANDSCAPE AND GEOPOLITICS

The Company's order intake in 2025, with high win rates for new platforms with both new and traditional OEMs as well as for both EV and ICE platforms, supports the Company's already strong base, which includes supplying products to more than 1,400 vehicle models and around 100 car brands. The order intake in 2025 supports the Company's ability to defend its around 44% sales market share in the near and medium term. For several years, the automotive industry has faced key trends that impact the industry, notably changes in technologies as well as geographic growth differences, with the emergence of new automakers being particularly visible in China. Autoliv has therefore increasingly focused resources on developing new products and strengthening its position with new automakers to capture the growth opportunities that come with these changes. This includes long-term development agreements with several new automakers in China in recent years, as well as increased investments in capacity and capabilities in India. The order intake from new automakers, mainly in China, accounted for around 1/3 of our total order intake in 2025. We won multiple awards tied to industry trends such as autonomous driving. These include solutions that protect occupants in reclined seating positions, addressing critical safety risks in next‑generation interiors. We strengthened our Mobility Safety Solutions business by winning new orders for our advanced Pyro Safety Switch, supporting the growing segment of 1,000‑volt electric vehicles. We continued to expand our safety offering in India with advanced systems such as seat‑cushion airbags and front‑center airbags. We licensed our Human Body Model solution to our first customer. In China, the Company estimates that around 50% of order intake in 2025 was with domestic Chinese OEMs, which supports our expectation that domestic OEMs in China will continue to increase their share of the Company's sales in China in 2026. New order intake is defined as the sales value of awards for future business received within that year. The lifetime value is calculated using detailed assumptions of price and volumes over the years of production and the exchange rates prevailing at the time of receiving the order.

The lead time from order intake to start of production is typically 1-3 years. During this period the products are engineered into the vehicle to provide the expected protection for occupants in case of a crash and to meet legal and regulatory requirements, as well as other requirements from the vehicle manufacturer. This investment in new products is the main factor of RD&E expenses, net. Additionally, the Company has to build up production capacity, in the form of new lines, to meet future product launches.

In 2025, OEMs sourcing of new business was at a low level for the industry, as OEMs are reconsidering certain future product offerings due to technological and geopolitical uncertainties, including uncertainties regarding costs for tariffs. The Company's order intake share for 2025 continued on a high level. Even so, the low level of OEM sourcing activity in 2025 resulted in an order intake in 2025 that was on the same low level as in 2024. The estimated life-time sales for all orders booked in 2025 is around $7.7 billion, compared to around $7.4 billion in 2024. As sourcing of several large platforms were pushed into 2026, we expect a rebound of OEM sourcing activity and Autoliv order intake in 2026.

STRATEGIC AND STRUCTURAL INITIATIVES

The 2025 light vehicle market was impacted by a technological and geopolitical uncertainties, with continued elevated customer call-off volatility and inflationary pressure on costs for labor. In response, Autoliv management continued to implement strict cost control measures, as well as execute significant structural cost reduction measures. In June 2023, the Company communicated a cost reduction framework that included the intent to reduce its indirect headcount by up to 2,000, and to improve direct labor productivity equivalent to a reduction of up to a 6,000 direct workforce positions. Based on the intended indirect workforce reductions, the Company estimates that total annual cost reductions will amount to around $130 million when fully implemented, with approximately $50 million in savings recorded in 2024, increasing to around $100 million in 2025 and the remaining amount expected in 2026 and 2027. At the end of 2025, around 1,600 of the planned indirect reductions had been completed.

Direct labor efficiency has developed well in both 2024 and 2025, supported by the direct labor workforce reduction program, improved call-off accuracy and a focused automation effort. It is the Company's estimate that the program's target of 6,000 direct labor workforce reduction was achieved by the end of 2025.

The provision, net of reversals, for restructuring activities in 2025 amounted to $8 million compared to $18 million in 2024. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had $82 million reserved in its balance sheet related to restructuring compared to $151 million last year. For more information, see Note 13, Restructuring, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

In addition to the structural improvements outlined above, the Company continues to implement the strategic initiatives to improve the efficiency of its value chain from end to end, not least through the Autoliv Production System and increased digitalization and automation. The Company has a high pace in the planning and implementation of the strategic initiatives. These initiatives are key drivers to the Company's targets and building the foundation to continue to create shareholder value.

IMPROVED EFFICIENCIES THROUGH OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE

Pricing pressure is an inherent part of the automotive supplier business. Price reductions are generally higher on newer products with strong volume growth compared to older products, where both the possibilities to re-design the product to reduce costs and market growth are less. Price reductions can also depend on the business cycle and raw material price development. For the five-year period 2017-2021, the Company estimates the average reduction of product prices on existing programs to have been in the range of around 2-4% annually. In 2022, the pricing environment changed to some extent due to high raw material price and cost increases, which led to renegotiations with customers regarding commercial terms. These discussions resulted in a net positive price development, gradually implemented throughout the year. This was also the case in 2023, and for 2024 as well, albeit at a lower level as inflation moderated. In 2025, inflation moderated further, as did customer compensations for excess inflation. Customer recoveries for increased tariff costs impacted net sales positively in 2025.

A key strategy for Autoliv to be and to remain cost competitive is to reduce labor costs, through continuously implementing productivity improvement programs, optimizing the Company's production footprint, and instituting restructuring and capacity alignment activities as well as other actions to address the Company's cost structure.

The Company's productivity improvement target, measured as labor minutes per unit, is to achieve at least 8% savings per year. This is an increase from previous target of 5% savings per year. The increase reflects mainly increased opportunities related to advances in digitalization and automation, including machine learning and AI. To meet this target, Autoliv has developed a set of strategies to reduce costs in manufacturing:

The Company's historical experience is that its continuous improvement strategies have enabled productivity improvements at or above its historic target of 5%. However, the Company has not achieved its 5% productivity target since the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, due to the decline in LVP in 2020 and the high volatility in customer call-offs in 2021, 2022 and 2023, driven by the industry wide supply chain instability, especially for semiconductors. In 2024, however, the Company achieved its 5% productivity target, as gradual improvement in customer call-off volatility enabled improved operational efficiency. In 2025, the Company achieved its new target of 8% labor minutes per unit productivity.

The Company foresees opportunities for further productivity on organic sales growth and increased call-off stability when global supply chains continue to stabilize further to pre-pandemic levels, but also from increasing use of automation in its assembly for lean manufacturing processes. Additionally, automated cells typically perform the manufacturing process with reduced variability. This results in greater control and consistency of product quality.

FOCUS ON QUALITY

The number of vehicle recalls in the automotive industry continues to be at a relatively high level. The Company expects overall recall numbers to remain high for years to come and, although the Company strives for the highest quality in its processes, it cannot be ruled out that the Company may also be adversely impacted by a future recall.

Quality has been and always will be the Company's number one priority, and the Company continues to sharpen its focus in this area. The Company now holds a global market share in passive safety of around 44%, while the Company has been involved in around 3% of recalls in the industry in the past ten years. This indicates that the Company is delivering on its quality strategy. For more information see product warranty and recalls in Note 14, Product Related Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

CHANGES IN COMPETITIVE AND CUSTOMER LANDSCAPE

The Company has not noted any significant changes in the competitive landscape in 2025. We consider Joyson Safety Systems, a part of Ningbo Joyson Electronic Corp., and ZF LIFETEC, a part of ZF Friedrichshafen AG, to be global competitors to Autoliv. In addition, there are several smaller regional and product specific competitors, especially in China.

The customer landscape is gradually changing, with a multitude of new OEMs emerging in recent years. This is especially prominent within electric vehicles and in China. In China, domestic OEMs have gained significant market shares and as a group now has larger market share than global OEMs have in China. Autoliv's sales to domestic OEMs in China has grown rapidly. In 2022, this group accounted for 22% of Autoliv's sales in China, and in 2025 their share of Autoliv sales in China was 44%. The fastest growing OEM in China in recent years has been BYD, although its growth slowed significantly in 2025. BYD has a uniquely high degree of vertical integration, with a large proportion of in-house sourcing of products and systems. This includes passive safety systems, which is supplied by its subsidiary FinDreams Technology. Autoliv supplies components, especially inflators, to FinDreams Technology.

CAPITAL STRUCTURE

The Company’s net debt stood at $1,566 million on December 31, 2025. This was an increase of $12 million compared to December 31, 2024. Total interest-bearing debt at December 31, 2025 amounted to $2,153 million, an increase of $244 million compared to December 31, 2024.

Cash flow from operations was $1,157 million in 2025 and $1,059 million in 2024. Capital expenditures, net amounted to $423 million in 2025 and $563 million in 2024. During 2025 and 2024, the Company paid dividends of $238 million and $219 million, respectively.

It is the Company’s policy to maintain a financial leverage commensurate with a “strong investment grade credit rating”. The long-term target is to have a leverage ratio (see section Non-GAAP Performance Measures) not above 1.5x. At December 31, 2025, the leverage ratio was 1.1x. The Company monitors its capital structure and the financial markets closely and intends to maintain a high level of financial flexibility while being shareholder friendly.

As part of the adjustment of the capital structure, the Company has historically repurchased shares of its common stock. During 2025 and 2024, the Company repurchased and retired 3.1 million and 5.1 million shares, respectively. On June 4, 2025, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program that authorizes the Company to repurchase up to $2.5 billion of common shares and operates from July 1, 2025 through December 31, 2029.

In 2024, the Company also retired 2 million shares previously held in Treasury stock. As of December 31, 2025, the Company continues to hold around 2.6 million shares of common stock in treasury.

OUTLOOK FOR 2026

In addition to the assumptions noted below and our business and market update provided herein, the Company's guidance for 2026 is mainly based on its customer call-offs and the achievement of its targeted cost compensation adjustments with its customers, including no material changes to tariffs or trade restrictions, as compared to what is in effect as of January 23, 2026, as well as no significant changes in the macro-economic environment, changes to customer call-off volatility or significant supply chain disruptions.

The forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures above are provided on a non-GAAP basis. Autoliv has not provided a GAAP reconciliation of these measures because items that impact these measures, such as costs related to capacity alignments and antitrust matters, cannot be reasonably predicted or determined. As a result, such reconciliation is not available without unreasonable efforts and Autoliv is unable to determine the probable significance of the unavailable information.

SIGNIFICANT LEGAL MATTERS

See Item 3. Legal Proceedings and Note 19, Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated net sales in 2025 increased by 4.1% compared to 2024. Excluding positive currency translation effects of 0.7%, the organic sales increased (Non-GAAP measure, see reconciliation table below) by 3.4% compared to the global LVP increase of 3.9% (according to S&P Global, Jan 2026).

Sales by Product

1) Effects from currency translations.

2) Including Corporate and Other sales.

Airbags, Steering Wheels and Other

Sales for Airbags, Steering Wheels and Other grew organically (Non-GAAP measure, see reconciliation table above) by 3.4% in 2025. The largest contributor to the increase was side airbags and inflatable curtains, followed by steering wheels, center airbags and driver airbags.

Seatbelt Products and Other

Sales for Seatbelt Products and Other grew organically (Non-GAAP measure, see reconciliation table above) by 3.5% in 2025. Sales growth was mainly driven by Americas and Asia excluding China followed by Europe and China.

Sales by Region

1) Effects from currency translations.

Autoliv’s global sales increased organically (Non-GAAP measure, see reconciliation table above) by 3.4% in 2025 compared to 2024, which was around 0.5 percentage points below global LVP growth (according to S&P Global, January 2026). The 0.5pp underperformance was positively impacted by product launches and tariff compensations. This was more than offset by negative effects from the regional and model LVP mix development, which we estimate contributed to about 2.5pp underperformance. This was particularly accentuated in China.

Our organic sales growth (Non-GAAP measure) outperformed LVP growth by 3.4pp in Americas, by 3.3pp in Asia excluding China and by 2.4pp in Europe, while we underperformed by 6.1pp in China. LVP growth in China in 2025 was driven by domestic OEMs with typically lower safety content. LVP for global OEMs declined by 1.3% while it increased by 16% for domestic OEMs. Autoliv's sales to domestic OEMs increased by 23% in 2025 while it decreased by 7.3% to global OEMs in China. We expect continued strong sales growth in China in 2026, driven by our performance with domestic OEMs.

2025 Organic Growth (Non-GAAP measure)