TABLE OF CONTENTS

3

Glossary of Acronyms and Terms

The following listing provides a comprehensive reference of common acronyms and terms used throughout the document:

4

PRINCETON BANCORP, INC.

PART I

In this report, unless the context indicates otherwise, references to “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to the Company and the Bank.

Item 1. Business

General

Princeton Bancorp, Inc. is a Pennsylvania corporation formed in 2022 to be the holding company for The Bank of Princeton (the “Bank”). The Bank was incorporated on March 5, 2007 under the laws of the State of New Jersey and is a New Jersey state-chartered banking institution. The Bank was granted its bank charter on April 17, 2007, commenced operations on April 23, 2007 and is a full-service bank providing personal and business lending and deposit services. As a state-chartered bank, the Bank is subject to regulation by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance and the FDIC. The area served by the Bank, through its 33 branches, is generally an area within an approximate 50-mile radius of Princeton, NJ, including parts of Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Ocean, and Somerset Counties in New Jersey, and additional areas in portions of Philadelphia, Montgomery and Bucks Counties in Pennsylvania. The Bank also has two retail branches and conducts loan origination activities in select areas of the New York City metropolitan area.

The Bank offers traditional retail banking services, one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans, multi-family and commercial mortgage loans, construction loans, commercial business loans and consumer loans, including home equity loans and lines of credit.

From 2007 until January 2023, the Bank was a stand-alone bank. On January 10, 2023, the Bank caused the Company to acquire all the outstanding stock of the Bank in a corporate reorganization. As a result, the Bank became the sole direct subsidiary of the Company, the Company became the holding company for the Bank and the stockholders of the Bank became stockholders of the Company. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had 249 total employees and 247 full-time equivalent employees.

On May 19, 2023, the Company completed the acquisition of Noah Bank, a Pennsylvania chartered state bank headquartered in Elkins Park, Pennsylvania that primarily served the Philadelphia, North New Jersey and New York City markets. On that date the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock, for cash, of Noah Bank and Noah Bank was merged with and into the Bank.

On August 23, 2024, the Company completed the acquisition of Cornerstone Financial Corporation (“CFC”), the holding company for Cornerstone Bank, a New Jersey chartered state bank headquartered in Mt. Laurel, New Jersey that primarily served the southern New Jersey market. The Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of CFC in exchange for the Company’s stock, CFC was merged into the Company, and Cornerstone Bank was merged with and into the Bank.

Our headquarters and one of our branches are located at 183 Bayard Lane, Princeton, New Jersey 08540. Our telephone number is (609) 921-1700 and our website address is www.thebankofprinceton.com.

The Company has elected to prepare this Annual Report on Form 10- K and other annual and periodic reports as a “smaller reporting company” consistent with the rules of the SEC.

Competition

We have substantial competition in originating commercial and consumer loans in our market area. This competition comes principally from other banks, savings institutions, mortgage banking companies and other lenders.

5

Many of our competitors enjoy advantages over us, including greater financial resources and higher lending limits, more aggressive marketing campaigns, better brand recognition, a wider geographic presence, more accessible branch office locations, the ability to offer a wider array of services or more favorable pricing alternatives, as well as lower origination and operating costs. Among other things, this competition could reduce our interest income and net income by decreasing the number and size of loans that we originate and the interest rates we may charge on these loans. We compete for loans primarily on the basis of value and service by building customer relationships through addressing our customers’ entire suite of banking needs, demonstrating expertise, and providing convenience. We also consider the competitive pricing levels in each of our markets.

In attracting business and consumer deposits, we face substantial competition from other insured depository institutions such as banks, savings institutions and credit unions, as well as institutions offering uninsured investment alternatives, including money market funds. These competitors may offer higher interest rates on deposits, which could decrease the deposits that we attract, or require us to increase the rates we pay to retain existing deposits or attract new deposits. Deposit competition could adversely affect our net interest income and net income, and our ability to generate the funds we require for our lending or other operations. As a result, we may need to seek other sources of funds that may be more expensive to obtain and could increase our cost of funds. We compete for deposits similarly on the basis of value and service and by providing convenience through a banking network of branches and ATMs within our markets and our website at https://thebankofprinceton.com.

FinTechs continue to emerge in key areas of banking. In addition, larger established technology platform companies continue to evaluate, and in some cases, create businesses focused on banking products. We closely monitor activity in the marketplace to ensure that our products and services are technologically competitive. Our overall strategy involves seeking to identify partnership and possible investment opportunities in technology-driven companies that can augment our distribution and product capabilities.

Lending Activities

Our loan portfolio consists of variable-rate and fixed-rate loans with a significant concentration in commercial real estate lending. While most loans and other credit facilities are appropriately collateralized, major emphasis is placed upon the financial condition of the borrower and the borrower’s cash flow versus debt service requirements.

Loan growth is driven by customer demand, which in turn is influenced by individual and business indebtedness and consumer demand for goods. Loaning money will always entail some risk. Without loaning money, however, a bank cannot generate enough net interest income to be profitable. The risk involved in each loan must be carefully evaluated before the loan is made. The interest rate at which the loan is made should always reflect the risk factors involved, including the term of the loan, the value of collateral, if any, the reliability of the projected source of repayment, and the amount of the loan requested. Credit quality and repayment capacity are generally the most important factors in evaluating loan applications.

The majority of our loans are to borrowers in our immediate markets. We believe that no single borrower or group of borrowers presents a credit concentration whereby the borrowers’ loan default would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Commercial Real Estate and Multi-family. At December 31, 2024, commercial real estate and multi-family loans amounted in the aggregate to $1.39 billion, or 76.1% of the total loans receivable. Our commercial real estate portfolio has increased $242.2 million or 21.1% since December 31, 2023, when commercial real estate and multi-family loans amounted to $1.14 billion, or 73.8%, of our total portfolio.

The commercial real estate and multi-family loan portfolio consists primarily of loans secured by small office buildings, strip shopping centers, small apartment buildings and other properties used for commercial and multi-family purposes located in the Company’s market area. At December 31, 2024, the average commercial and multi-family real estate loan size was approximately $1.8 million.

6

Although terms for commercial real estate and multi-family loans vary, our underwriting standards generally allow for terms up to 7 years with loan-to-value ratios of not more than 75%. Most of the loans are structured with balloon payments of 5 years or less and amortization periods of up to 25 years. Interest rates are either fixed or adjustable, based upon designated market indices such as the Wall Street Journal prime rate plus a margin.

Commercial real estate and multi-family real estate lending involves different risks from single-family residential lending. These risks include larger loans to individual borrowers and loan payments that are dependent upon the successful operations of the project or the borrower’s business. These risks can be affected by supply and demand conditions in the project’s market area of rental housing units, office and retail space and other commercial space. We attempt to minimize these risks by limiting loans to proven businesses, only considering properties with existing operating performance which can be analyzed, using conservative debt coverage ratios in our underwriting, and periodically monitoring the operation of the business or project and the physical condition of the property.

Various aspects of commercial and multi-family loan transactions are evaluated in an effort to mitigate the additional risk in these types of loans. In our underwriting procedures, consideration is given to the stability of the property’s cash flow history, future operating projections, current and projected occupancy levels, location and physical condition. Generally, we impose a debt service ratio (the ratio of net cash flows from operations to debt service) of not less than 1.25 X. We also evaluate the credit and financial condition of the borrower, and if applicable, the guarantor. With respect to loan participation interests we purchase; we underwrite the loans as if we were the originating lender. Appraisal reports prepared by independent appraisers are reviewed by an outside third party prior to closing.

Set forth below is a brief description of our three largest commercial real estate or multi-family loans:

Commercial and Industrial Loans. At December 31, 2024, commercial and industrial loans amounted in the aggregate to $93.0 million, or 5.1%, of the total loan portfolio. Our commercial and industrial portfolio has increased $42.0 million, or 82.2%, since December 31, 2023, when commercial and industrial loans amounted to $51.0 million, or 3.3%, of our total loan portfolio.

Commercial business loans are made to small to mid-sized businesses in our market area primarily to provide working capital. Small business loans may have adjustable or fixed rates of interest and generally have terms of three years or less but may be as long as 15 years. Our commercial business loans have historically been underwritten based on the creditworthiness of the borrower and generally require a debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.25 X. In addition, we generally obtain personal guarantees from the principals of the borrower with respect to commercial business loans and frequently obtain real estate as additional collateral.

7

Set forth below is a brief description of our three largest commercial and industrial loans:

Construction Loans. We originate various types of commercial loans, including construction loans, secured by collateral such as real estate, business assets and personal guarantees. The loans are solicited on a direct basis and through various professionals with whom we maintain contact and by referral from our directors, stockholders and customers. At December 31, 2024, our construction loans amounted to $257.2 million, or 14.1% of our total loans receivable. The average size of a construction loan was approximately $5.0 million at December 31, 2024. Our construction loans portfolio has decreased $53.0 million or 17.1% since December 31, 2023, when construction loans amounted to $310.2 million, or 20.0% of our total loans receivable. Construction lending represents a segment of our loan portfolio and is driven primarily by market conditions. Loans to finance construction of condominium projects or single-family homes and subdivisions are generally offered to experienced builders in our primary market area with whom we have an established relationship. The maximum loan-to-value limit applicable to these loans is 75% of the appraised post construction value and does not require amortization of the principal during the term of the loan. We often establish interest reserves and obtain personal and corporate guarantees as additional security on the construction loans. Interest reserves are used to pay monthly payments during the construction phases of the loan and are treated as an addition to the loan balance. Interest reserves pose an additional risk to the Bank if it does not become aware of deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition before the interest reserve is fully utilized. In order to mitigate risk, financial statements and tax returns are obtained from borrowers on an annual basis. Construction loan proceeds are disbursed periodically in increments as construction progresses and as inspection by approved appraisers or loan inspectors warrants. Construction loans are negotiated on an individual basis but typically have floating rates of interest based on a common index plus a stipulated margin. Additional fees may be charged as funds are disbursed. As units are completed and sold, we require that payments to reduce principal outstanding be made prior to them being released. We may permit a pre-determined limited number of model homes to be constructed on an unsold or “speculative” basis. Construction loans also include loans to acquire land and loans to develop the basic infrastructure, such as roads and sewers. The majority of the construction loans are secured by properties located in our primary areas.

Set forth below is a brief description of our three largest construction loans or loan relationships:

8

Residential First-Lien Mortgage Loans. We offer a narrow range of prime residential first-lien mortgage loans at competitive rates. Our customers, stockholders and local real estate brokers are a significant source of these loans. We strive to process, approve and fund loans in a timeframe that meets the needs of our borrowers. Generally, we originate and retain non-conforming residential first-lien mortgage loans and refer conforming residential first-lien mortgage loans to a third party, whereby we may earn a fee. At December 31, 2024, our residential first-lien loans amounted to $68.0 million, or 3.7%, of our total portfolio. Our residential first-lien loan portfolio has increased $30.0 million, or 78.8%, since December 31, 2023, when residential first-lien loans amounted to $38.0 million, or 2.5%, of our total loan portfolio. This substantial increase was due to our acquisition of CFC in August 2024.

Home Equity Loans and Consumer Loans. We generate these loans and lines of credit primarily through direct marketing at our branch locations, referrals from local real estate brokers and, to a lesser extent, by targeted direct marketing programs such as mail and electronic mail. Consumer loans are solicited on a direct basis and upon referrals from our directors, stockholders and existing customers.

Loans Receivable, Net. Loans receivable, net increased from $1.55 billion at December 31, 2023, to $1.82 billion at December 31, 2024, an increase of $270.5 million, or 17.5%. The increase was attributable to an increase in commercial real estate loans of $242.2 million, an increase in commercial and industrial loans of $42.0 million and an increase in residential first-lien mortgage loans of $30.0, partially offset by a decrease of $53.0 million in construction loans. The acquisition of CFC in August 2024 resulted in an increase of $255.5 to the loan portfolio.

The following table details our loan maturities by loan segment and interest rate type:

The accrual of interest is discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest is 90 days past due or management has serious doubts about further collectability of the principal or interest, even if the loan is currently performing.

9

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our nonaccrual loans, accruing loans 90 days or more past-due, and other real estate owned. 

See Note 5 - “Loans Receivable” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements within this Form 10-K for additional information regarding our loans not classified as nonperforming assets as of December 31, 2024 and for other information on our loan ratings of special mention, substandard and doubtful, all of which contain varying degrees of potential credit problems that could result in the loans being classified as nonaccrual, past-due 90 or more days or modifications to borrowers with financial difficulty in a future period.

Analysis of Allowance for Credit Losses. On January 1, 2023, the Company adopted Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2016-13 Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“CECL” or “ASC 326”), which requires the recognition of the allowance for credit losses be estimated using the CECL methodology. The measurement of expected credit losses under CECL methodology is applicable to financial measured assets at amortized cost, including loan receivables. Available-for-sale (“AFS”) debt securities are included and require credit losses to be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down. It also applies to off-balance sheet credit exposure, such as unfunded loan commitments, standby letters of credit and other similar instruments.

The Company adopted ASC 326 using the modified retrospective method for all financial assets measured at amortized cost and off-balance sheet credit exposures. The Company recorded a net decrease of $284 thousand to retained earnings as of January 1, 2023 for the cumulative effect of adopting ASC 326, which included a net deferred asset of $110 thousand. The transition adjustment includes a $301 thousand decrease to the allowance for credit losses and the increase of $695 thousand in the allowance of credit losses on off-balance sheet credit-exposures.

The credit loss estimation process involves procedures to appropriately consider the unique characteristics of loan portfolio segments, which consist of commercial real estate loans, construction loans, commercial and industrial loans, residential loans and HELOC/consumer loans. These segments are further disaggregated into loan classes, the level at which credit risk is monitored. For each of these segments, the Company generates cash flow projections at the instrument level wherein payment expectations are adjusted for estimated prepayment speed, curtailments, time to recovery, probability of default and loss given default. The modeling of expected prepayment speeds, curtailment rates, and time to recovery are based on historical data. The quantitative component of the ACL on loans is model-based and utilizes a forward-looking macroeconomic forecast. The Company uses a discounted cash flow method, incorporating probability of default and loss given default forecasted based on statistically derived economic variable loss drivers, to estimate expected credit losses. This process includes estimates which involve modeling loss projections attributed to existing loan balances, and considering historical experience, current conditions, and future expectations for segments of loans over a reasonable and supportable forecast period.

10

The historical information used is that experienced by the Company or by a selection of peer banks, when appropriate.

Commercial real estate – Loans in this segment include owner-occupied commercial real estate, non-owner-occupied commercial real estate and multi-family dwellings within the Company’s market area. The underlying cash flows generated by the properties or operations can be adversely impacted by a downturn in the economy due to increased vacancy rates or diminished cash flows, which in turn, would have an effect on the credit quality in this segment. Management obtains financial information annually and monitors the cash flow of these loans.

Construction – Loans in this segment include primarily construction of condominium projects or single-family homes and subdivisions. Exposure to loans in this segment can come from construction delays, slow unit sales and insufficient interest reserves. The Company often requires personal and corporate guarantees as additional security on the loan. Management relies on progress reports and third-party experts prior to the release of additional funds.

Commercial and industrial loans – Loans in this segment are primarily for commercial business assets and/or purposes, which usually carry a personal guarantee from the business owners. Repayment is expected from the cash flow of the business. A weakened economy, and resultant decrease in consumer spending, will have an effect on quality in this segment.

Residential real estate loans – This portfolio segment consists of first lien secured by one-to-four family residential properties. The overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates and housing pricing, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.

Consumer/HELOC loans – Loans in this segment are substantially secured and repayment is dependent on the credit quality of the individual borrower and include junior-lien mortgages.

Credits with Similar Risk Characteristics.

The Company is using DCF in estimating the component of the allowance for credit losses for loans that share similar risk characteristics with other loans, such loans are segregated into loan segments. The model calculates an expected loss percentage for each segment by considering the probability of default, using life-of-loan analysis periods for all segments, and the historical severity of loss, based on the aggregate net lifetime losses incurred per loan segment. The default and severity factors used to calculate the allowance for credit losses for loans that share similar risk characteristics with other loans are adjusted for differences between historical period used to calculate historical severity of loss, based on the aggregate net lifetime losses incurred per loan segment. The default and severity factors used calculate the allowance for credit losses for loans that share similar risk characteristics with other loans adjusted for differences between the historical loss and severity rates and expected conditions over the remaining lives of the loans in the portfolio related to: a) lending policy and procedures; b) economic conditions; c) volume of the loan portfolio; d) experience and depth of lending management; e) level of delinquencies; f) quality of our loan review system; g) the value of underlying collateral for collateralized loans and h) level of concentration of a particular segment.

Individually Evaluated Financial Assets.

For a loan that does not share risk characteristics with other loans, expected credit loss is measured based on net realizable value. We generally consider these to be nonperforming loans. For these loans, we recognize expected credit loss equal to the amount by which the net realizable value of the loan is less than the amortized cost basis of the loan, except when the loan is collateral dependent, that is, when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the sale of the collateral. In these cases, expected credit loss is measured as the difference between amortized cost basis and the loan and the fair value of the collateral less disposal costs (such as sales costs, transfer taxes and unpaid real estate taxes).

11

Allowance for Credit Losses on Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures, Including Unfunded Loan Commitments.

The Company maintains a separate allowance for credit losses from off-balance-sheet credit exposures, including unfunded loan commitments, which are included in other liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition. Management estimates the amount of expected losses by calculating a commitment usage factor over the contractual period of exposure that are not unconditionally cancellable by the Company by applying the loss factors used in the ACL methodology to the result of the usage calculation to estimate the liability for credit losses related to unfunded commitments for each loan type. The allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures is adjusted as credit loss expense.

As of December 31, 2024, the allowance for credit losses on loans was $23.7 million as compared to $18.5 million as of December 31, 2023. The $5.2 million increase in the allowance for credit losses was attributed to a $2.3 million provision related to the Bank’s loan portfolio, $3.2 million associated with non-purchase credit deteriorated loans associated with loans acquired in the CFC acquisition, partially offset by $353 thousand of net-charge offs recorded during 2024.

At December 31, 2024, non-performing assets totaled $27.1 million, an increase of $20.4 million when compared to the amount at December 31, 2023. The increase was due to the delinquency of two commercial real estate loans totaling $25.4 million with collateral supporting each loan. The Company is a participant in these loans and is currently evaluating its options with the lead bank, including but not limited to placing the loans on the market for sale.

The following table presents a summary of our allowance for credit losses on loans and nonaccrual loans by total loans and a summary of net charge-offs by loan segments:

12

The following table presents the allocation of the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment for the years presented. The allocation of a portion of the allowance for credit losses to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.

See Note 5 – “Loans Receivable” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements within this Form 10-K for additional information regarding our allowance for credit losses.

Investment Securities (available-for-sale and held-to-maturity)

We hold securities that are available to fund increased loan demand or deposit withdrawals and other liquidity needs, and which provide an additional source of interest income. Securities are classified as held-to-maturity (“HTM”) or available-for-sale (“AFS”) at the time of purchase. Securities are classified as HTM if we have the ability and intent to hold them until maturity. HTM securities are carried at cost, adjusted for unamortized purchase premiums and discounts. Securities that are classified as AFS are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of income taxes, reported as a component of equity within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

Securities available-for-sale, which are carried at fair value, increased $155.8 million, or 170.6%, to $247.2 million at December 31, 2024 from $91.4 million at December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily due to $179.5 million in purchases of available-for-sale securities during 2024, the addition of $13.9 million from the CFC acquisition, partially offset by an increase of $2.5 million attributed to the unrealized losses associated with the available-for-sale portfolio, principal repayments of $34.5 million and $300 thousand of maturities or calls.

13

The following table summarizes the weighted-average yields based on maturity distribution schedule of the amortized cost of AFS debt securities at December 31, 2024. Interest income presented in this Form 10-K for tax-advantaged obligations of state and political subdivisions has not been adjusted to reflect fully taxable-equivalent interest income. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the securities may be called without any penalties.

At December 31, 2024, there were no security holdings of any one issuer in an amount greater than 10.0% of our total stockholders’ equity. See Note 4 – “Investment Securities” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements within this Form 10-K for additional information regarding debt securities.

Cash and Due from Banks and Interest-earning Bank Balances

Cash and due from banks and interest-earning bank balances decreased from $34.5 million at December 31, 2023 to $33.6 million at December 31, 2024, a decrease of $888 thousand, or 2.6%.

Federal Funds Sold

Federal funds sold decreased from $116.0 million at December 31, 2023 to $83.7 million at December 31, 2024, a decrease of $32.3 million, or 27.9%. The decrease in federal funds sold was primarily due to increases in investment securities and in loans and partially offset by an increase in deposits.

Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment, net increased $3.4 million from December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2024 resulting from $3.5 million in premises and equipment acquired in connection with the CFC acquisition, and $1.6 million in a combination of purchases of new equipment and improvements, partially offset by $1.7 million in depreciation and disposals.

Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible

At December 31, 2024, the Company had $14.4 million of goodwill, an increase of $5.5 million when compared to December 31, 2023, related to the acquisition of CFC. At December 31, 2024 the Company had $3.6 million in core deposit intangible assets, an increase of $2.2 million when compared to December 31, 2023.

14

The remaining balance is comprised of $2.6 million from the CFC acquisition, $900 thousand from the WSFS branch acquisition that occurred in May 2019, and $73 thousand from the Noah acquisition. 

Operating Lease Right-of-Use Asset

Operating lease right-of-use asset decreased $1.5 million from $23.4 million at December 31, 2023 to $21.9 million at December 31, 2024 due to $1.3 million in leases acquired as part of the CFC acquisition, $1.8 million of new leases, offset by $4.6 million in amortization.

Equity Method Investments

The Company is a limited partner in a Small Business Investment Company (“SBIC”) and committed to contribute capital of $5.0 million to the partnership. At December 31, 2024, the SBIC had a book value of $3.3 million. The unfunded commitment to the partnership was $1.7 million at December 31, 2024.

The Company invested in a CRA eligible investment that acquires SBA loans within qualifying census tracts in which the Bank operates. The Company decides which loans are included in its investment. The Company had an outstanding commitment to fund up to $6.9 million and currently has $6.9 million funded. There is currently no unfunded commitment at December 31, 2024.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Other Assets

Accrued interest receivable increased $1.9 million from December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2024, primarily due to an increase in the outstanding principal balance of loans and investment securities at December 31, 2024. Deferred taxes increased $8.8 million from December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2024, primarily due to the CFC acquisition. Bank owned life insurance increased $13.3 million from December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2024, primarily due to $8.7 million acquired from CFC, $2.9 million in purchases and a $1.7 million increase in cash surrender value resulting from the increase in interest rates. Other assets increased $1.3 million from December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2024.

Deposits

Our deposit services are generally comprised of a traditional range of deposit products, including checking accounts, savings accounts, attorney trust accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit.

We offer our customers access to ATMs and other services which increase customer convenience and encourage continued and additional banking relationships.

We endeavor to maintain competitive rates on deposit accounts, and actual rates are established at the time that they are offered, and subsequently, based on contractual terms, taking into consideration competitor offerings. Although from time to time we advertise in local newspapers, our primary source of deposit relationships is satisfied customers. We offer a range of direct deposit products ranging from social security and disability payments to direct deposit of payroll checks.

During normal business practices the Bank will utilize deposits originated by brokers to support the Bank’s funding needs. At December 31, 2024 the balance of brokered deposits was $44.6 million, a decrease of $42.6 million from the $87.2 million outstanding at December 31, 2023.

At December 31, 2024, there were no customers whose deposit balances individually exceeded 5% of total deposits.

15

The following table presents the average balance of our deposit accounts and the average cost of funds for each category of our deposits, total uninsured deposits, and amount of uninsured portion of time deposits by maturity.

The following table represents the uninsured time deposits by maturity.

The uninsured portion of deposits is any balance that exceeds the FDIC insurance limit of $250,000. 

See the liquidity discussion within Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations within this Form 10-K for more information regarding our available funds.

Total deposits increased from $1.64 billion at December 31, 2023 to $2.03 billion at December 31, 2024, an increase of $396.9 million, or 24.26%. Included in this increase was $282.8 million in deposits acquired from CFC. Non-interest-bearing deposits increased $51.7 million, or 20.7%, to $301.0 million at December 31, 2024. The Company acquired $67.6 million of non-interest-bearing deposits from CFC. Interest-bearing deposits increased $345.2 million, or 24.9%. Included in this increase was $215.2 million of interest-bearing deposits acquired from CFC.

Borrowings

The Company had no outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2024 or December 31, 2023.

Accrued Interest Payable, Lease Liabilities and Other Liabilities

Accrued interest payable increased $6.2 million from $9.2 million at December 31, 2023 to $15.4 million at December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily the result of the increase in interest rates offered on deposit accounts during 2024 as well as the increase in deposit balances due partially to the CFC acquisition. Lease liabilities increased $1.3 million, while other liabilities increased $123 thousand.

16

Stockholders’ Equity

Total stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2024, increased $21.8 million or 9.09% when compared to December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily due to the $21.6 million increase in paid-in capital which is primarily associated with the issuance of $20.0 million of common stock related to the acquisition of CFC, and an increase in retained earnings of $2.5 million, which consisted of $10.2 million in net income, partially offset by $7.7 million of cash dividends recorded during the period, which increases were partially offset by an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $1.4 million. The ratio of equity to total assets at December 31, 2024 and at December 31, 2023 was 11.2% and 12.5%, respectively. The current period ratio decrease was primarily due to the CFC acquisition.

Other Services

To further attract and retain customer relationships, we provide a standard array of additional community banking services, which include the following:

We also offer, on a limited basis, payroll-related services and credit card and merchant credit card processing through third parties whereby we do not undertake credit or fraud risk.

Internet Banking

We advertise but do not actively solicit new deposits or loans through our website. We utilize a qualified and experienced internet service provider to furnish the following types of customer account services:

Fee Income

Fee income is a component of our non-interest income. By charging non-customers fees for using our ATMs and charging customers for banking services such as money orders, cashier’s checks, wire transfers and check orders, as well as other deposit and loan-related fees, we earn fee income. Prudent fee income opportunities are sought to supplement net interest income but may be limited by our efforts to remain competitive and by regulatory constraints.

Staffing

As of December 31, 2024, we had approximately 247 full-time equivalent employees.

Supervision and Regulation

General. We are extensively regulated under both federal and state law. These laws restrict permissible activities and investments and require compliance with various consumer protection provisions applicable to lending, deposit, brokerage and fiduciary activities. They also impose capital adequacy requirements and conditions to our ability to repurchase stock or to pay dividends. The Company is a registered bank holding company and, as such is subject to the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”) and to supervision and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). The Bank is also subject to the supervision and examination by the FDIC, as their primary federal regulator and as the insurer of the Banks’ deposits.

17

The Bank is also regulated and examined by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance (the “Department”). These regulators have broad discretion to impose restrictions and limitations on our operations. This supervisory framework could materially impact the conduct and profitability of our activities.

To the extent that the following information describes statutory and regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions. Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the banking industry are frequently raised at both the state and federal levels. The likelihood and timing of any changes in these laws and regulations, and the impact such changes may have on us, is difficult to ascertain. Changes in applicable laws and regulations, or in the manner such laws or regulations are interpreted by regulatory agencies or courts, may have a material effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to various requirements and restrictions under federal and state law, including requirements to maintain reserves against deposits, restrictions on the types, amount and terms and conditions of loans that may be originated, and limits on the type of other activities in which we may engage and the investments we may make. Banking regulations permit us to engage in certain additional activities, such as insurance sales and securities underwriting, through the formation of a “financial subsidiary.” In order to be eligible to establish or acquire a financial subsidiary, we must be “well capitalized” and “well managed” and may not have less than a “satisfactory” CRA rating. At this time, we do not engage in any activity which would require us to maintain a financial subsidiary. We are also subject to federal laws that limit the amount of transactions between us and any nonbank affiliates. Under these provisions, transactions, such as a loan or investment, by us with any nonbank affiliate are generally limited to 10% of our capital and surplus for all covered transactions with such affiliate or 20% percent of capital and surplus for all covered transactions with all affiliates. Any extensions of credit, with limited exceptions, must be secured by eligible collateral in specified amounts. We are also prohibited from purchasing any “low quality” assets from an affiliate. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) significantly expands the coverage and scope of the limitations on affiliate transactions within a banking organization.

Holding Company. The Federal Reserve has issued regulations under the BHCA that require a bank holding company to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary banks. As a result, the Federal Reserve, pursuant to such regulations, may require the Company to stand ready to use its resources to provide adequate capital funds to the Bank during periods of financial stress or adversity. The BHCA requires the Company to secure the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before it can acquire all or substantially all of the assets of any bank or acquire ownership or control of 5% or more of any voting shares of any bank. Such a transaction would also require approval of the Department.

A bank holding company is prohibited under the BHCA from engaging in, or acquiring direct or indirect control of, more than 5% of the voting shares of any company engaged in non-banking activities unless the Federal Reserve, by order or regulation, has found such activities to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Under the BHCA, the Federal Reserve has the authority to require a bank holding company to terminate any activity or relinquish control of a non-bank subsidiary (other than a non-bank subsidiary of a bank) upon the Federal Reserve’s determination that such activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial soundness and stability of any bank subsidiary of the bank holding company.

As a public company with our securities listed for trading on the NASDAQ stock market, the Company is subject to the disclosure and regulatory requirements of the SEC, including under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Exchange Act, and the rules and listing standards of the NASDAQ stock market.

Pause on Major Federal Reserve Rulemakings. In January 2025, the Federal Reserve stated that Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr would step down from the position, effective, February 28, 2025. The

18

Federal Reserve stated that it will not issue any major rulemakings from the time of the announcement until a new vice chair for supervision is confirmed by the U.S. Senate.

Monetary Policy. Our business, financial condition and results of operations are and will be affected by domestic economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States government and its agencies. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve have a significant effect upon the operating results of commercial banks such as ours. The Federal Reserve has a major effect upon the levels of bank loans, investments and deposits through its open market operations in United States government securities transactions and through its regulation of, among other things, the discount rate on borrowings of member banks and the reserve requirements against member banks’ deposits. It is not possible to predict the nature and impact of future changes in monetary and fiscal policies.

Deposit Insurance. The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC (“DIF”). No institution may pay a dividend if in default of the federal deposit insurance assessment.

The DIF has a designated reserve (target) ratio (“DRR”) of 2.00% of the estimated insured deposits. When the reserve ratio was 1.30 percent as of June 30, 2020, the FDIC adopted a restoration plan to ensure that the DIF reserve ratio reaches 1.35 percent within 8 years. However, increased loss provisions associated with the failures of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank and First Republic Bank in 2023 that reduced the DIF balance coupled with strong growth in uninsured deposits, resulted in the reserve ratio declining to 1.10 percent as of June 30, 2023. The reserve ratio increased to 1.21 percent as of June 30, 2024. The Restoration Plan maintains the current schedule of assessment rates for all insured depository institutions. Dividends are required to be paid to the industry should the DRR exceed 1.50%, but grants the FDIC sole discretion in determining whether to suspend or limit the declaration or payment of dividends. The assessment base for insured depository institutions is the average consolidated total assets during an assessment period less average tangible equity capital during that assessment period.

The limit for federal deposit insurance is $250,000 and the cash limit of Securities Investor Protection Corporation protection is also $250,000.

The FDIC has authority to increase insurance assessments. A significant increase in insurance assessments would likely have an adverse effect on our operating expenses and results of operations. Management cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the future.

Deposit insurance may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC.

Dividend Restrictions. Under the New Jersey Banking Act of 1948, as amended (the “Banking Act”), a bank may declare and pay cash dividends only if, after payment of the dividend, the capital stock of the bank will be unimpaired and either the bank will have a surplus of not less than 50% of its capital stock or the payment of the dividend will not reduce the bank’s surplus. The FDIC prohibits payment of cash dividends if, as a result, the institution would be undercapitalized, or the institution is in default with respect to any assessment due to the FDIC.

Under Pennsylvania law, the Company may not pay a dividend, if, after giving effect thereto, it would be unable to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business and, after giving effect to the dividend, the total assets of the Company would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed, if the Company were to be dissolved at the time of distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of shareholders whose rights are superior to those receiving the dividend.

It is also the policy of the Federal Reserve that a bank holding company generally may only pay dividends on common stock out of net income available to common shareholders over the past twelve months and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with a bank holding company’s capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition.

19

A bank holding company also should not maintain a dividend level that places undue pressure on the capital of such institution’s subsidiaries, or that may undermine the bank holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength for such subsidiaries.

Regulatory Capital Requirements. Federally insured, state-chartered non-member banks are required to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital. Current FDIC capital standards require these institutions to satisfy a common equity Tier 1 capital requirement, a leverage capital requirement and a risk-based capital requirement.

The common equity Tier 1 capital component generally consists of retained earnings and common stock instruments and must equal at least 4.5% of risk-weighted assets.

Leverage capital, also known as “core” capital, must equal at least 3.0% of adjusted total assets for the most highly rated state-chartered non-member banks. Core capital generally consists of common stockholders’ equity (including retained earnings). An additional cushion of at least 100 basis points is required for all other banking associations, which effectively increases their minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio to 4.0% or more. Under the FDIC’s regulations, the most highly-rated banks are those that the FDIC determines are strong banking organizations and are rated composite 1 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System.

Under the risk-based capital requirements, “total” capital (a combination of core and “supplementary” capital) must equal at least 8.0% of “risk-weighted” assets. The FDIC also is authorized to impose capital requirements in excess of these standards on individual institutions on a case-by-case basis.

Capital rules require a common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets, which is in addition to the other minimum risk-based capital standards described above. Institutions that do not maintain this required capital buffer become subject to progressively more stringent limitations on the percentage of earnings that can be paid out in dividends or used for stock repurchases and on the payment of discretionary bonuses to senior executive management. At December 31, 2023, the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements on a fully phased-in basis.

In determining compliance with the risk-based capital requirement, a banking organization is allowed to include both core capital and supplementary capital in its total capital, provided that the amount of supplementary capital included does not exceed the bank’s core capital. Supplementary capital generally consists of general allowances for loan losses up to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, together with certain other items. In determining the required amount of risk-based capital, total assets, including certain off-balance sheet items, are multiplied by a risk-weight based on the risks inherent in the type of assets. At December 31, 2024, the Bank exceeded all its regulatory capital requirements.

Any banking organization that fails any of the capital requirements is subject to possible enforcement action by the FDIC. Such action could include a capital directive, a cease-and-desist order, civil money penalties, the establishment of restrictions on the institution’s operations, termination of federal deposit insurance and the appointment of a conservator or receiver. The FDIC’s capital regulations provide that such actions, through enforcement proceedings or otherwise, could require one or more of a variety of corrective actions.

The Company qualifies as a “small bank holding company” with respect to the application of consolidated capital requirements because it has less than $3 billion of consolidated assets. “Small bank holding companies” are not subject to the consolidated capital requirements unless otherwise directed by the Federal Reserve.

Prompt Corrective Action. In addition to the required minimum capital levels described above, federal law establishes a system of “prompt corrective actions” that federal banking agencies are required to take, or have discretion to take, based upon the capital category into which a federally-regulated depository institution falls. Regulations set forth detailed procedures and criteria for implementing prompt corrective action in the case of any institution which is not adequately capitalized.

20

The following table shows the amount of capital associated with the different capital categories set forth in the prompt corrective action regulations.

In addition, a banking organization is “critically undercapitalized” if it has a ratio of tangible equity to total assets that is equal to or less than 2.0%. Under specified circumstances, a federal banking agency may reclassify a well-capitalized institution as adequately capitalized and may require an adequately capitalized institution or an undercapitalized institution to comply with supervisory actions as if it were in the next lower category (except that the FDIC may not reclassify a significantly undercapitalized institution as critically undercapitalized).

A banking organization generally must file a written capital restoration plan which meets specified requirements within 45 days of the date that the institution receives notice or is deemed to have notice that it is undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized. A federal banking agency must provide the institution with written notice of approval or disapproval within 60 days after receiving a capital restoration plan, subject to extensions by the agency. A banking organization which is required to submit a capital restoration plan must concurrently submit a performance guaranty by each company that controls the institution. In addition, undercapitalized organizations are subject to various regulatory restrictions, and the appropriate federal banking agency also may take any number of discretionary supervisory actions. At December 31, 2024, the Bank was not subject to any of the above mentioned restrictions.

Community Reinvestment Act. The Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) requires that banks meet the credit needs of all of their assessment area, as established for these purposes in accordance with applicable regulations based principally on the location of branch offices, including those of low-income areas and borrowers. The CRA also requires that the FDIC assess all financial institutions that it regulates to determine whether these institutions are meeting the credit needs of the community they serve. Under the CRA, institutions are assigned a rating of “outstanding,” “satisfactory,” “needs to improve” or “unsatisfactory.” Our record in meeting the requirements of the CRA is made publicly available and is taken into consideration in connection with any applications with federal regulators to engage in certain activities, including approval of a branch or other deposit facility, mergers and acquisitions, office relocations, or expansions into non-banking activities. As of December 31, 2024, we maintained a “satisfactory” CRA rating. On October 24, 2023, the FDIC, the Federal Reserve, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued a final rule to strengthen and modernize the CRA regulations. The rule materially revises the current CRA framework, including the assessment areas in which a bank is evaluated to include activities associated with online and mobile banking, the tests used to evaluate the Bank in its assessment areas, new methods of calculating credit for lending, investment, and service activities, and additional data collection and reporting requirements. Under the final rule, banks with assets of at least $600 million as of December 31 in both of the prior two calendar years and less than $2 billion as of December 31 in either of the prior two calendar years will be an “intermediate bank.” The agencies will evaluate intermediate banks under the Retail Lending Test and either the current community development test, referred to in the final rule as the Intermediate Bank Community Development Test, or, at the bank’s option, the Community Development Financing Test. The rule was expected to take effect on April 1, 2024, with most of its provisions becoming applicable on January 1, 2026, and additional requirements becoming applicable on January 1, 2027. Several banking industry groups filed a lawsuit seeking to invalidate the CRA final rule, in which they argued that the federal banking agencies exceeded their statutory authority in adopting the CRA final rule. In March 2024, a federal judge granted an injunction to extend the CRA final rule’s effective date, originally set for April 1, 2024.

21

The effective date will be extended each day the injunction remains in place, pending the resolution of the lawsuit.

Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank Act became law on July 21, 2010. The Dodd-Frank Act implemented far-reaching changes across the financial regulatory landscape. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), which is an independent bureau within the Federal Reserve System with broad authority to regulate the consumer finance industry, including regulated financial institutions such as us, as well as non-banks and others who are involved in the consumer finance industry. The CFPB has exclusive authority through formal rulemaking, as well as through the issuance of orders, policy statements, guidance and enforcement actions to administer and enforce federal consumer financial protection laws, to oversee non-federally regulated entities, to prevent practices that the CFPB deems unfair, deceptive or abusive. While the CFPB has these extensive powers to interpret, administer and enforce federal consumer financial protection laws, the Dodd-Frank Act provides that the FDIC continues to have examination and enforcement powers over us on matters otherwise falling within the CFPB’s jurisdiction because we have less than $10 billion in assets. The Dodd-Frank Act also gives state attorneys general the ability to enforce federal consumer protection laws.

Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) Membership. We are a member of the FHLB-NY. Each member of the FHLB-NY is required to maintain a minimum investment in capital stock of the FHLB-NY. The Board of Directors of the FHLB-NY can increase the minimum investment requirements in the event it has concluded that additional capital is required to allow it to meet its own regulatory capital requirements. Any increase in the minimum investment requirements outside of specified ranges requires the approval of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Because the extent of any obligation to increase our investment in the FHLB-NY depends entirely upon the occurrence of a future event, potential payments to the FHLB-NY are not determinable.

Additionally, in the event that we fail, the right of the FHLB-NY to seek repayment of funds loaned to us will take priority over certain other creditors.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a public company, the Bank is subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 which addresses, among other issues, corporate governance, auditing and accounting, executive compensation, and enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate information. As directed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer are required to certify that our quarterly and annual reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact. The rules adopted by the SEC under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act require these officers to certify that they are responsible for establishing, maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; they have made certain disclosures to our auditors and the audit committee of the Board of Directors about our internal control over financial reporting; and they have included information in our quarterly and annual reports about their evaluation and whether there have been changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could materially affect internal control over financial reporting.

Loans to One Borrower. New Jersey banking law limits the total loans and extensions of credit by a bank to one borrower at one time to 15% of the capital funds of the bank, or up to 25% of the capital funds of the bank if the additional 10% is fully secured by collateral having a market value (as determined by reliable and continuously available price quotations) at least equal to the amount of the loans and extensions of credit over the 15% limit. At December 31, 2024, the Bank’s lending limit to one borrower under regulatory guidelines was $40.6 million, but our Board of Directors has set an internal lending limit of approximately 75.0% of the legal lending limit or $30.5 million.

Concentration and Risk Guidance. The federal banking regulatory agencies promulgated joint interagency guidance regarding material direct and indirect asset and funding concentrations. The guidance defines a concentration as any of the following: (i) asset concentrations of 25% or more of Total Capital (loan related) or Tier 1 Capital (non-loan related) by individual borrower, small interrelated group of individuals, single repayment source or individual project; (ii) asset concentrations of 100% or more of Total Capital (loan related)

22

or Tier 1 Capital (non-loan related) by industry, product line, type of collateral, or short-term obligations of one financial institution or affiliated group; (iii) funding concentrations from a single source representing 10% or more of Total Assets; or (iv) potentially volatile funding sources that when combined represent 25% or more of Total Assets (these sources may include brokered, large, high-rate, uninsured, internet-listing-service deposits, Federal funds purchased or other potentially volatile deposits or borrowings). If a concentration is present, management must employ heightened risk management practices including board and management oversight and strategic planning, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing, third party review and increasing capital requirements. The Bank adheres to the practices recommended in this guidance.

Restrictions on Transactions with Affiliates, Directors, and Officers. Under the Federal Reserve Act, the Bank may not lend funds or otherwise extend credit to its parent holding company or any other affiliate, except on specified types and amounts of collateral generally upon market terms and conditions. The Federal Reserve also has authority to define and limit the transactions between banks and their affiliates. The Federal Reserve’s Regulation W and relevant federal statutes and regulations, among other authorities, impose significant limitations on transactions in which the Bank may engage with us or with other affiliates, including per-affiliate and aggregate limits on affiliate transactions.

Federal Reserve Regulation O restricts loans to the Bank and its parent holding company’s insiders, which includes directors, certain officers, and principal shareholders and their respective related interests. All extensions of credit to the insiders and their related interests must be on the same terms as, and subject to the same loan underwriting requirements as, loans to persons who are not insiders. In addition, Regulation O imposes lending limits on loans to insiders and their related interests and imposes, in certain circumstances, requirements for prior approval of the loans by the Bank board of directors.

Changes in New Jersey Tax Laws. On September 29, 2020, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed into law A.4721, extending through December 31, 2023, the 2.5% surtax imposed on Corporation Business Tax (CBT) filers with allocated taxable net income over $1 million. As originally enacted, the surtax rate was scheduled to decrease from 2.5% to 1.5% for privilege periods beginning on or after January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021 and expire for privilege periods beginning on or after January 1, 2022. On June 28, 2024, New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy signed legislation, A.B. 4704, which enacted a 2.5% surtax, termed the “Corporate Transit Fee,” on certain CBT taxpayers that have New Jersey allocated taxable net income over $10 million. The new surtax is in addition to the CBT and applies to privilege periods beginning on or after January, 1, 2024, through December, 31, 2028.

Cyber-security. Federal and state legislation and regulations contain extensive cybersecurity and data privacy provisions. Our regulatory agencies including the CFPB, FDIC, and Federal Reserve also have oversight over us with respect to cybersecurity and data privacy. We are subject to the rules and regulations promulgated under the authority of the CFPB and Federal Trade Commission, which regulates unfair or deceptive acts or practices, including with respect to cybersecurity and data privacy. In addition, effective April 1, 2022, the Federal Reserve and FDIC issued a rule that, among other things, requires a banking organization to notify its primary federal regulator as soon as possible and within 36 hours after identifying a “computer-security incident” that the banking organization believes in good faith could materially disrupt, degrade or impair its business or operations in a manner that would, among other things, jeopardize the viability of its operations, result in customers being unable to access their deposit and other accounts, result in a material loss of revenue, profit or franchise value, or pose a threat to the stability of the U.S. financial sector.

Federal regulators have issued two related statements regarding cyber-security. One statement indicates that financial institutions should design multiple layers of security controls to establish lines of defense and ensure their risk management processes also address the risk posed by compromised client credentials, including security measures to reliably authenticate clients accessing internet-based services of the financial institution. The other statement indicates that a financial institution’s management is expected to maintain sufficient

business continuity planning processes to ensure the rapid recovery, resumption, and maintenance of the institution’s operations after a cyber-attack involving destructive malware.

23

A financial institution is also expected to develop appropriate processes to enable recovery of data and business operations and address rebuilding network capabilities and restoring data if the institution or its critical service providers fall victim to this type of cyber-attack. If we fail to observe the regulatory guidance, we could be subject to various regulatory sanctions, including financial penalties.

In the ordinary course of business, we rely on electronic communications and information systems to conduct our operations and to store sensitive data. We employ a variety of preventative and detective controls and tools to monitor, block, and provide alerts regarding suspicious activity and to report on any suspected advanced persistent threats. We also offset cyber risk through internal training, testing of our employees, and we procure insurance to provide assistance on significant incidents and to offset potential liability.

We have not experienced a significant compromise, significant data loss, or any material financial losses related to cyber-security attacks. Risks and exposures related to cyber-security attacks are expected to remain high for the foreseeable future due to the rapidly evolving nature and sophistication of these threats, as well as due to the expanding use of third-party service providers, internet banking, mobile banking, and other technology-based products and services by us and our clients.

Compensation. The scope and content of compensation regulation in the financial industry are continuing to develop, and we expect that these regulations and resulting market practices will continue to evolve over a number of years. The federal bank regulatory agencies have issued joint guidance on executive compensation designed to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of banking organizations, such as the Company and the Bank, do not encourage imprudent risk taking and are consistent with the safety and soundness of the organization. The SEC has a rule that directs stock exchanges to require listed companies to implement clawback policies to recover incentive-based compensation from current or former executive officers in the event of certain financial restatements and requires companies to disclose their clawback policies and their actions under those policies.

Other Laws and Regulations. We are subject to a variety of laws and regulations which are not limited to banking organizations. For example, in lending to commercial and consumer borrowers, and in owning and operating our own property, we are subject to regulations and potential liabilities under state and federal environmental laws.

We are heavily regulated by regulatory agencies at the federal and state levels. As a result of events in the financial markets and the economy in recent years, we, like most of our competitors, have faced and expect to continue to face increased regulation and regulatory and political scrutiny, which creates significant uncertainty for us and the financial services industry in general.

Future Legislation and Regulation. Regulators have increased their focus on the regulation of the financial services industry in recent years. Proposals that could substantially intensify the regulation of the financial services industry have been and are expected to continue to be introduced in the U.S. Congress, in state legislatures and by applicable regulatory authorities. These proposals may change banking statutes and regulation and our operating environment in substantial and unpredictable ways. If enacted, these proposals could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions, and other financial institutions. We cannot predict whether any of these proposals will be enacted and, if enacted, the effects that such laws or any implementing regulations would have on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business and results of operations are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. The material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect the Company are described below. Additional risks and uncertainties that management is not aware of or that management currently deems immaterial may also impair the Bank’s business operations.

24

This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our risk factors can be broadly summarized by the following categories:

• Credit and Interest Rate Risks

• Risks Related to the Bank’s Common Stock

• Economic Risks

• Operational Risks

• Strategic Risks

• Risks Related to the Regulation of our Industry

CREDIT AND INTEREST RATE RISKS

Our loan portfolio has a significant concentration in commercial real estate and commercial construction loans.

Our loan portfolio is made up largely of commercial real estate loans and commercial construction loans. At December 31, 2024, we had approximately $1.39 billion of commercial real estate loans, which represented 76.1% of our total loan portfolio. Our commercial real estate loans include loans secured by owner-occupied and non-owner-occupied tenanted properties for commercial uses and multi-family loans. The portfolio also consists of construction loans of approximately $257.2 million, or 14.1%, of our total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2024. In addition, we make both secured and unsecured commercial and industrial loans. At December 31, 2024, we had $92.9 million of commercial and industrial loans, which represented 5.1% of our total loan portfolio.

Commercial real estate loans generally expose a lender to a higher degree of credit risk of nonpayment and loss than other loans because of several factors, including dependence on the successful operation of a business or a project for repayment, the collateral securing these loans may not be sold as easily as for other loans, and loan terms may include a balloon payment rather than full amortization over the loan term. In addition, commercial real estate loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Underwriting and portfolio management activities cannot completely eliminate all risks related to these loans. Any significant failure to pay on time by our customers or a significant default by our customers could materially and adversely affect us.

Loans secured by owner-occupied real estate are reliant on the underlying operating businesses to provide cash flow to meet debt service obligations, and as a result they are more susceptible to the general impact on the economic environment affecting those operating companies as well as the real estate market. In general, construction and land lending involve additional risks because of the inherent difficulty in estimating a property’s value both before and at completion of the project as well as the estimated cost of the project and the time needed to sell the property at completion. Construction costs may exceed original estimates as a result of increased materials, labor or other costs. Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, as well as the market value of the completed project and the effects of governmental regulation on real property, it is relatively difficult to evaluate accurately the total funds required to complete a project and the related loan-to-value ratio. Changes in the demand, such as for new housing and higher than anticipated building costs may cause actual results to vary significantly from those estimated. For these reasons, this type of lending also typically involves higher loan principal amounts and is often concentrated with a small number of builders. A downturn in housing, or the real estate market, could increase loan delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures, and significantly impair the value of our collateral and our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure. Some of our builders have more than one loan outstanding with us and also have residential mortgage loans for rental properties with us. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss.

25

In addition, no payment from the borrower is required during the term of most of our construction loans since the accumulated interest is added to the principal of the loan through an interest reserve. As a result, construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent on the success of the ultimate project and the ability of the borrower to sell or lease the property or refinance the indebtedness, rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest. If the appraisal of the value of the completed project proves to be overstated, we may have inadequate security for the repayment of the loan upon completion of construction of the project and may incur a loss. Because construction loans require active monitoring of the building process, including cost comparisons and on-site inspections, these loans are more difficult and costlier to monitor. Increases in market rates of interest may have a more pronounced effect on construction loans by rapidly increasing the end-purchasers’ borrowing costs, thereby reducing the overall demand for the project. Properties under construction are often difficult to sell and typically must be completed in order to be successfully sold which also complicates the process of working out problem construction loans. This may require us to advance additional funds and/or contract with another builder to complete construction. Further, in the case of speculative construction loans, there is added risk associated with identifying an end-purchaser for the finished project which poses a greater potential risk to us than construction loans to individuals on their personal residences. Loans on land under development or held for future construction as well as lot loans made to individuals for the future construction of a residence also pose additional risk because of the lack of income being produced by the property and the potential illiquid nature of the collateral. These risks can also be significantly impacted by supply and demand conditions.

Any recession in our local economy and commercial real estate market may make it more difficult for commercial real estate borrowers to repay their loans in a timely manner as commercial real estate borrowers’ ability to repay their loans frequently depends on the successful development of their properties. The deterioration of one or a few of our commercial real estate loans could cause a material increase in our level of nonperforming loans, which would result in a loss of revenue from these loans and could result in an increase in the provision for loan losses and/or an increase in charge offs, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our net income. We also may incur losses on commercial real estate loans due to declines in occupancy rates and rental rates, which could occur as a result of less need for office space due to more people working from home or other factors. This would decrease property values and may decrease the likelihood that a borrower may find permanent financing alternatives. Any weakening in the commercial real estate market will increase the likelihood of default on these loans, which could negatively impact our loan portfolio’s performance and asset quality. If we are required to liquidate the collateral securing a loan to satisfy the debt during a period of reduced real estate values, we could incur material losses. Any of these events could increase our costs, require management time and attention, and materially and adversely affect us.

Federal banking agencies have issued guidance regarding high concentrations of commercial real estate loans within bank loan portfolios. The guidance requires financial institutions that exceed certain levels of commercial real estate lending compared with their total capital to maintain heightened risk management practices that address the following key elements: board and management oversight and strategic planning, portfolio management, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing, and maintenance of increased capital levels as needed to support the level of commercial real estate lending. If there is any deterioration in our commercial real estate portfolio or if our regulators conclude that we have not implemented appropriate risk management practices, it could adversely affect our business, and could result in the requirement to maintain increased capital levels or restrict our ability to originate new loans secured by commercial real estate. We can provide no assurance that capital would be available at that time.

The nature of our construction loan portfolio may expose us to increased lending risks.

A portion of our construction loans are unseasoned, meaning that they were originated relatively recently. Our limited time with these loans does not provide us with a significant payment history pattern with which to judge future collectability. As a result, it may be difficult to predict the future performance of our loan portfolio.

26

These loans may have delinquency or charge off levels above our expectations, which could negatively affect our performance.

The small to mid-sized businesses that we lend to may have fewer resources to weather a downturn in the economy, which may impair a borrower’s ability to repay a loan to us that could materially harm our operating results.

We target our business development and marketing strategy primarily to serve the banking and financial services needs of small to mid-sized businesses. These small to mid-sized businesses frequently have smaller market share than their competition, may be more vulnerable to economic downturns, often need substantial additional capital to expand or compete and may experience significant volatility in operating results. In addition, the success of a small to mid-sized business often depends on the management talents and efforts of one or two persons or a small group of persons, and the death, disability or resignation of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on the business and its ability to repay a loan. Any economic downturns and other events that negatively impact our market areas could cause us to incur substantial credit losses that could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our allowance for credit losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses.

Like all financial institutions, we maintain an allowance for credit losses to provide for loan defaults and nonperformance. The process for determining the amount of the allowance is critical to our financial results and condition. It requires difficult, subjective and complex judgments about external factors, including the impact of national and regional economic conditions on the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans. If our judgment proves to be incorrect, our allowance for credit losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio. Further, state and federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, review our loans and allowance for credit losses and may require an increase in our allowance for credit losses. Although we believe that our allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2024 is adequate to cover known and probable incurred losses included in the portfolio, we cannot provide assurances that we will not further increase the allowance for credit losses or that our regulators will not require us to increase this allowance. Either of these occurrences could adversely affect our earnings.

Increased interest rates have decreased the value of a portion of the Company’s securities portfolio, and the Company would realize losses if it were required to sell such securities to meet liquidity needs.

As a result of inflationary pressures and the resulting rapid increases in interest rates from early 2022 into 2023, the fair value of our securities classified as available for sale has declined. These securities make up a majority of the securities portfolio of the Company, resulting in unrealized losses embedded in other comprehensive income as a part of shareholders’ equity. If the Company were required to sell such securities to meet liquidity needs, including in the event of deposit outflows or slower deposit growth, it may incur losses, which could impair the Company’s capital, financial condition, and results of operations and require the Company to raise additional capital on unfavorable terms, thereby negatively impacting its profitability. While the Company has taken actions to maximize its funding sources, there is no guarantee that such actions will be successful or sufficient in the event of sudden liquidity needs.

The financial services industry is undergoing a period of great volatility and disruption.

Changes in interest rates, in the shape of the yield curve, or in valuations in the debt or equity markets or disruptions in the liquidity or other functioning of financial markets, most of which have occurred, could directly impact us in one or more of the following ways:

27

Changes in interest rates may adversely affect our earnings and financial condition.

Our net income depends primarily upon our net interest income. The level of net interest income is primarily a function of the average balance of our interest-earning assets, the average balance of our interest-bearing liabilities, and the spread between the yield on such assets and the cost of such liabilities. These factors are influenced by both the pricing and mix of our interest earning assets and our interest-bearing liabilities which, in turn, are impacted by such external factors as the local economy, competition for loans and deposits, the monetary policy of the Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve, and market interest rates.

A sustained increase in market interest rates could adversely affect our earnings if our cost of funds increases more rapidly than our yield on our interest earning assets and compresses our net interest margin. In addition, the economic value of equity could decline if interest rates increase. Different types of assets and liabilities may react differently, and at different times, to changes in market interest rates. We expect that we will periodically experience gaps in the interest rate sensitivities of our assets and liabilities. That means either our interest-bearing liabilities will be more sensitive to changes in market interest rates than our interest-earning assets, or vice versa. When interest-bearing liabilities mature or re-price more quickly than interest earning assets, an increase in market rates of interest could reduce our net interest income.

Likewise, when interest earning assets mature or re-price more quickly than interest bearing liabilities, falling interest rates could reduce our net interest income. We are unable to predict changes in market interest rates, which are affected by many factors beyond our control, including inflation, deflation, recession, unemployment, money supply, domestic and international events and changes in the United States and other financial markets.

We also attempt to manage risk from changes in market interest rates, in part, by controlling the mix of interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities. However, interest rate risk management techniques are not exact. A rapid increase or decrease in interest rates could adversely affect our results of operations and financial performance.

RISKS RELATED TO THE BANK’S COMMON STOCK

The Holding Company’s ability to pay dividends depends primarily on receiving dividends from the Bank, which is subject to regulatory limits and the Bank’s performance.

The Company is a bank holding company and banking operations are conducted by its subsidiary, the Bank. The Company’s ability to pay dividends depends on its receipt of dividends from the Bank. Dividend payments from the Bank are subject to legal and regulatory limitations, generally based on net profits and retained earnings, imposed by the various banking regulatory agencies. The ability of the Bank to pay dividends is also subject to its profitability, financial condition, capital expenditures, other cash flow requirements, and other factors deemed relevant by its Board of Directors.

28

There is no assurance that the Bank will be able to pay dividends in the future, and if able, that the dividends will be at the same rate as 2024, or that the Company will generate adequate cash flow from the Bank to pay dividends in the future. The Company’s failure to pay dividends on its common stock could have a material adverse effect on the market price of its common stock.

Our stock price may reflect securities market conditions.

The effectiveness of governmental, fiscal and monetary policies, and regulatory responses to the market conditions affect the financial markets and the market prices for securities generally, and the market prices for bank stocks, including our common stock. The stock market’s gains due to a concentration of high growth companies has been adversely affected by inflation and higher interest rates and other national and international events.

ECONOMIC RISKS

Inflation can have an adverse impact on the Company’s business and its customers.

Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be worth less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. Over the past year, in response to a pronounced rise in inflation, the Federal Reserve has raised certain benchmark interest rates to combat inflation. As discussed above under “CREDIT AND INTEREST RATE RISKS— Changes in interest rates may adversely affect our earnings and financial condition.”, as inflation increases and market interest rates rise, the value of the Company’s investment securities, particularly those with longer maturities, would decrease, although this effect can be less pronounced for floating rate instruments. In addition, inflation generally increases the cost of goods and services the Company uses in its business operations, such as electricity and other utilities, and also generally increases employee wages, any of which can increase the Company’s non-interest expenses. Furthermore, the Company’s customers are also affected by inflation and the rising costs of goods and services used in their households and businesses, which could have a negative impact on their ability to repay their loans with the Company. Sustained higher interest rates by the Federal Reserve to tame persistent inflationary price pressures could also push down asset prices and weaken economic activity. A deterioration in economic conditions in the United States and the Company’s markets could result in an increase in loan delinquencies and non-performing assets, decreases in loan collateral values and a decrease in demand for the Company’s products and services, all of which, in turn, would adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face risks related to health epidemics and other outbreaks, severe weather, power or telecommunications loss, and terrorism which could significantly disrupt our operations.

Business disruptions can occur due to forces beyond the Bank’s control such as severe weather, power or telecommunications loss, accidents, flooding, terrorism, health emergencies, the spread of infectious diseases or pandemics. Our business could be adversely impacted by the effects of any of these events to the extent that they harm the local or national economy. Any of these events may also impact our branches, our operations, our customers and/or our vendors, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These business disruptions may include temporary closure of our branches and/or the facilities of our customers or vendors and suspension of services, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Market conditions and economic cyclicality may adversely affect our industry.

Market developments, including unemployment, price levels, stock and bond market volatility, and changes, including those resulting from world events, affect consumer confidence levels, economic activity and inflation. Changes in payment behaviors and payment rates may increase delinquencies and default rates, which could affect our earnings and credit quality.

29

Instability in global economic conditions and geopolitical matters could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Instability in global economic conditions and geopolitical matters could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. The macroeconomic environment in the U.S. is susceptible to global events and volatility in financial markets. For example, global conflicts (including the continuing conflicts involving Ukraine and the Russian Federation and those in the Middle East) or other similar events, as well as government actions of other restrictions in connection with such events, and trade negotiations between the U.S. and other nations could adversely impact economic and market conditions for the Company and its clients and counterparties. In addition, global supply chain disruptions may cause prolonged inflation, adversely impact consumer and business confidence, and adversely affect the economy as well as our financial condition and results.

OPERATIONAL RISKS

Further negative developments in the banking industry could adversely affect our business operations and our financial condition and results of operations.

The large bank failures during the first half of 2023 and related negative media attention generated significant market trading volatility among publicly traded bank holding companies and, in particular, regional, as well as community banks like the Company. Similar developments in the future could negatively impact customer confidence in regional and community banks, which could prompt customers to move their deposits to larger financial institutions. Further, competition for deposits has increased in recent periods, and the cost of funding has similarly increased, putting pressure on our net interest margin. If we were required to sell a portion of our securities portfolio to address liquidity needs, we may incur losses, including as a result of the negative impact of rising interest rates on the value of our securities portfolio, which could negatively affect our earnings and our capital. If we were required to raise additional capital in the current environment, any such capital raise may be on unfavorable terms, thereby negatively impacting book value and profitability. While we have taken actions to improve our funding, there is no guarantee that such actions will be successful or sufficient in the event of sudden liquidity needs.

There has also been increased regulatory scrutiny – in the course of routine examinations and otherwise – and new regulations directed towards banks of similar size to the Company, designed to address the negative developments in the banking industry in 2023, all of which may increase our costs of doing business and reduce our profitability. Among other things, there may be an increased focus by both regulators and investors on deposit composition, the level of uninsured deposits, losses embedded in the held-to-maturity portion of our securities portfolio, contingent liquidity, CRE composition and concentration, capital position and our general oversight and internal control structures regarding the foregoing. As a result, the Company could face increased scrutiny or be viewed as higher risk by regulators and the investor community.

Competition from other financial institutions in originating loans and attracting deposits may adversely affect our profitability.

We face substantial competition in originating loans. This competition comes principally from other banks, savings institutions, mortgage banking companies, credit unions and other lenders in our market area, which is generally an area within an approximate 100-mile radius of Princeton and dominated by large statewide, regional and interstate banking institutions. Many of our competitors enjoy advantages, such as greater financial resources and higher lending limits, a wider geographic presence, more accessible branch office locations, the ability to offer a wider array of services or more favorable pricing alternatives, as well as lower origination and operating costs. This competition could reduce our net income by decreasing the number and size of loans that we originate and the interest rates we may charge on these loans.

30

These competitors may offer higher interest rates on deposits than we do, which could decrease the deposits that we attract or require us to increase our interest rates on deposit accounts to retain existing deposits or attract new deposits. Increased deposit competition could adversely affect our ability to generate the funds necessary for lending operations and may increase our cost of funds. Additionally, these competitors may offer lower interest rates on loans than we do, which could decrease the amount of loans that we attract or require us to decrease our interest rates on loans to attract new loans. Increased loan competition could adversely affect our net interest margin.

We also compete with non-bank providers of financial services, such as brokerage firms, consumer finance companies, insurance companies and governmental organizations which may offer more favorable terms. Some of our non-bank competitors are not subject to the same extensive regulations that govern our operations. As a result, such non-bank competitors may have advantages over us in providing certain products and services. This competition may reduce or limit our margins on banking services, reduce our market share and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

If deposit levels are not sufficient, it may be more expensive to fund loan originations.

Our deposits have been our primary funding source. In current market conditions, depositors may choose to redeploy their funds into higher yielding investments, the stock market or other investment alternatives, regardless of our effort to retain such depositors. If this occurs, it will hamper our ability to grow deposits and could result in a net outflow of deposits. Our average total deposits for the year ended December 31, 2024 of $1.83 billion were $318.9 million higher than the $1.51 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023, but a substantial portion of that deposit growth was due to the CFC acquisition. We will continue to focus on deposit growth, which we use to fund loan originations. However, if we are unable to sufficiently increase our deposit balances, we will be required to increase our use of alternative sources of funding, including FHLB advances, or to increase our deposit rates in order to attract additional deposits, each of which would increase our cost of funds.

We must maintain and follow high underwriting standards to grow safely.

Our ability to grow our assets safely depends on maintaining disciplined and prudent underwriting standards and ensuring that our relationship managers and lending personnel follow those standards. The weakening of these standards for any reason, such as to seek higher yielding loans, or a lack of discipline or diligence by our employees in underwriting and monitoring loans, may result in loan defaults, foreclosures and additional charge offs and may necessitate that we significantly increase our allowance for credit losses. As a result, our business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects could be adversely affected.

We are a community bank and our ability to maintain our reputation is critical to the success of our business and the failure to do so may materially adversely affect our performance.

We are a community bank, and our reputation is one of the most valuable components of our business. As such, we strive to conduct our business in a manner that enhances our reputation. This is done, in part, by recruiting, hiring and retaining employees who share our core values of being an integral part of the communities we serve, delivering superior service to our customers and caring about our customers and associates. If our reputation is negatively affected by the actions of our employees or otherwise, our business and, therefore, our operating results may be materially adversely affected. Additionally, damage to our reputation could undermine the confidence of our current and potential clients in our ability to provide financial services. Such damage could also impair the confidence of our counterparties and business partners, and ultimately affect our ability to effect transactions. Maintenance of our reputation depends not only on our success in maintaining our service-focused culture and controlling and mitigating the various risks described herein, but also on our success in identifying and appropriately addressing issues that may arise in areas such as potential conflicts of interest, anti-money laundering, client personal information and privacy issues, record-keeping, regulatory investigations and any litigation that may arise from the failure or perceived failure of us to comply with legal and regulatory requirements.

31

Maintaining our reputation also depends on our ability to successfully prevent third parties from infringing on the “The Bank of Princeton” brand and associated trademarks. Defense of our reputation, including through litigation, could result in costs adversely affecting our business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects.

Our internal control systems could fail to detect certain events.

We are subject to certain operational risks, including but not limited to data processing system failures and errors and customer or employee fraud. We maintain a system of internal controls to mitigate such occurrences which system recently had to be modified to cover the additional risks caused by the increase in the amount of time our employees are working remotely. We also maintain insurance coverage for such risks. However, should such an event occur that is not prevented or detected by our internal controls, is uninsured or in excess of applicable insurance limits, it could have a significant adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects.

If we cannot favorably assess the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, we may be subject to additional regulatory scrutiny.

Like other banks of our size, our management is required to prepare a report that contains an assessment by management of the effectiveness of our internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting (including the Call Report that is submitted to the FDIC) as of the end of each fiscal year. The rules that must be met for management to assess our internal controls over financial reporting are complex and require significant documentation and testing and possible remediation of internal control weaknesses. The effort to comply with regulatory requirements relating to internal controls will likely cause us to incur increased expenses and will cause a diversion of management’s time and other internal resources. We also may encounter problems or delays in completing the implementation of any changes necessary to make a favorable assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. If we cannot favorably assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investor confidence and the price of our common stock could be adversely affected, and we may be subject to additional regulatory scrutiny.

We rely on third parties to provide key components of our business infrastructure, and the failure of these parties to fulfil their obligations to us could disrupt our operations.

Third parties provide key components of our business infrastructure such as data processing, internet connections, network access, core application processing, statement production and account analysis. Our business depends on the successful and uninterrupted functioning of our information technology and telecommunications systems and third- party servicers. The failure of these systems, or the termination of a third-party software license or service agreement on which any of these systems is based, could interrupt our operations. Because our information technology and telecommunications systems interface with and depend on third-party systems, we could experience service denials if demand for such services exceeds capacity, or such third-party systems fail or experience interruptions. Replacing vendors or addressing other issues with our third-party service providers could entail significant delay and expense. If we are unable to efficiently replace ineffective service providers, or if we experience a significant, sustained or repeated, system failure or service denial, it could compromise our ability to operate effectively, damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, and subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

32

We cannot predict how changes in technology will impact our business; increased use of technology may expose us to service interruptions.

The financial services market, including banking services, is increasingly affected by advances in technology, including developments in:

Our ability to compete successfully in the future will depend, to a certain extent, on whether we can anticipate and respond to technological changes. We offer electronic banking services for our consumer and business customers including Internet banking, mobile banking and electronic bill payment, as well as banking by phone. We also offer ATM and debit cards, wire transfers, and ACH transfers. The successful operation and further development of these and other new technologies will likely require additional capital investment in the future. In addition, increased use of electronic banking creates opportunities for interruptions in service which could expose us to claims by customers or other third parties. We can provide no assurance that we will have sufficient resources or access to the necessary technology to remain competitive in the future.

We use AI in connection with our business and operations, which exposes us to inherent risks that may expose us to material harm.

AI in the banking industry refers to the use of advanced algorithms, machine learning, and automation to enhance operational efficiency, improve customer experiences, strengthen security, and optimize financial decision-making. Banks leverage AI for fraud detection, risk assessment, predictive analytics, chatbots for customer service, personalized financial recommendations, and automated regulatory compliance. By analyzing vast amounts of data in real time, AI helps institutions reduce costs, mitigate risks, detect anomalies, and deliver more efficient and secure banking services.

The Bank does not utilize AI for decision-making processes or internal bot usage as any automation within the Bank is driven by macros and predefined rule-based workflows rather than AI-driven models. AI technology, however, is employed within select third-party solutions integrated into our operations. These include SentinelOne for advanced cybersecurity threat detection and response, Verafin for fraud detection and AML compliance, the Glia Chatbot for enhancing customer service interactions, and CATO Networks for AI-driven network security and optimization. These third-party tools that utilize a limited AI model support security, risk management, and operational efficiency but do not influence credit, lending, or other decision-making functions within the Bank. We do not believe that these products pose a material risk on the company’s business or financial results.

AI is complex and rapidly evolving, and the introduction of AI, a relatively new and emerging technology in the early stages of commercial use, into our business and operations may subject us to new or heightened legal, regulatory, ethical, operational, reputational, or other risks. The models underlying AI may be incorrectly or inadequately designed or implemented and trained on, or otherwise use, data or algorithms that are, and output that may be, incomplete, inadequate, misleading, biased, poor-quality or otherwise flawed, any of which may not be easily detectable. Further, inappropriate or controversial data practices by developers and end-users or other factors adversely affecting public opinion of AI could impair the acceptance of AI, including those incorporated in our business and operations.

33

If the AI that we use is deficient, inaccurate or controversial, we could incur operational inefficiencies, competitive harm, legal and regulatory action, brand or reputational harm, or other adverse impacts on our business and financial results. Further, there can be no assurance that our use of AI will be successful in enhancing our business or operations or otherwise result in our intended outcomes, and our competitors may incorporate AI into their businesses or operations more quickly or more successfully than us.

AI and the use thereof is also subject to a variety of existing laws and regulations, including fair lending, consumer protection, intellectual property, cybersecurity, data privacy, and equal opportunity, and is expected to be subject to new laws and regulations or new applications of existing laws and regulations. AI is the subject of evolving review by various governmental and regulatory agencies, and changes in laws and regulations governing AI may adversely affect our ability to use AI. Additionally, various federal, state and foreign governments and regulators have implemented, or are considering implementing, general legal and regulatory frameworks for the appropriate use of AI. It is possible that we will not be able to anticipate how to respond to these rapidly developing laws and regulations. Further, if we do not have sufficient rights to use the data or algorithms on which our AI solutions rely or the output generated thereby, we also may incur liability through the violation of applicable laws and regulations, such as fair lending laws and regulations, third-party intellectual property, privacy or other rights, or contracts to which we are a party. We may not be able to sufficiently mitigate or detect any of the foregoing risks or concerns given our and other market participants’ lack of experience with using AI, the pace of technological change, and rapid adoption of AI by our business partners and competitors. Any actual or perceived failure to address risks or concerns relating to the use of AI, whether unfounded or not, could adversely affect our business and operations.

We face risks from cyber-attacks and other information or security breaches, including denial of service attacks, hacking, social engineering attacks targeting our colleagues, contractors, and customers, malware intrusion or data corruption attempts, and identity theft that could result in the disclosure of confidential, proprietary, personal and other information, any of which could adversely affect our business or reputation, and create significant legal and financial exposure.

Our computer and data management systems and network infrastructure, and those of third parties on which we are highly dependent, are subject to cybersecurity risks and could be susceptible to cyber-attacks or other information or security breaches. Our business relies on the secure processing, transmission, storage, and retrieval of confidential, proprietary, personal, and other information in our computer and data management systems and network infrastructure, and in the computer and data management systems and network infrastructure of third parties. In addition, to access our network, products, and services, our customers and other third parties may use personal mobile devices or computing devices that are outside of our network environment and are subject to their own cybersecurity risks.

We, our customers, regulators, and other third parties, including other financial services institutions and companies engaged in data processing, have been subject to, and are likely to continue to be the target of, cyber-attacks or other information or security breaches. These cyber-attacks or other information or security breaches include computer viruses, denial of service attacks, hacking, social engineering attacks (including phishing and smishing attacks) targeting our colleagues, contractors, and customers, malware intrusion or data corruption attempts, ransomware, improper access by employees or contractors, identity theft, and other security breaches that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss, destruction, or other processing of confidential, proprietary, personal, and other information of ours, our employees, our customers, or of third parties, damage our systems and infrastructure or otherwise materially disrupt our, our customers’, or other third parties’ network access or business operations. As cyber-attacks or other information or security breaches continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any cybersecurity vulnerabilities or cyber-attacks or other information or security breaches. Despite efforts to ensure the integrity of our systems and implement controls, processes, policies, and other protective measures, we may not be able to anticipate all security breaches, nor may we be able to implement sufficient preventive measures against such cyber-attacks or other information or security breaches, which may result in material losses or consequences for us.

34

Cybersecurity risks for banking organizations have significantly increased in recent years in part because of the proliferation of new technologies, including AI, and the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies to conduct financial transactions. For example, cybersecurity risks may increase in the future as we continue to increase our mobile-payment and other internet-based product offerings and expand our internal usage of web-based products and applications. In addition, cybersecurity risks have significantly increased in recent years in part due to the increased sophistication and activities of cyber threat actors, such as organized crime affiliates, terrorist organizations, state-sponsored actors, hostile foreign governments, disgruntled employees or vendors, activists, and other external parties, including those involved in corporate espionage, any of whom may enhance their efforts through the use of AI. Even the most advanced internal control environment may be vulnerable to compromise. Due to increasing geopolitical tensions, nation state cyber-attacks and ransomware are both increasing in sophistication and prevalence. Targeted social engineering and email attacks (i.e., “spear phishing” attacks) are becoming more sophisticated and are extremely difficult to prevent. In such an attack, an attacker will attempt to fraudulently induce colleagues, contractors, customers, clients, or other users of our systems and infrastructure to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our, our customers’, or our clients’ systems and infrastructure, or the confidential, proprietary, personal, or other information stored or processed thereon. Persistent attackers may succeed in penetrating defenses given enough resources, time, and motive. The techniques used by cyber threat actors change frequently, may not be recognized until launched, and may not be recognized until well after a cyber-attack or other information or security breach has occurred. The speed at which new vulnerabilities are discovered and exploited, often before security patches are published, continues to rise. Remote work further increases the risk that we may experience cyber-attack or other information or security breaches as a result of our employees, colleagues, contractors, and other third parties with which we do business or upon which we rely working remotely on less secure systems and environments.

The risk of a security breach caused by a cyber-attack or other information security breach at a third party with which we do business or upon which we rely, or by unauthorized access by such third party, has also increased in recent years. Additionally, the existence of cyber-attacks or other information or security breaches at such third parties with access to our confidential, proprietary, personal, and other information may not be disclosed to us in a timely manner. Further, our ability to monitor such third parties’ cybersecurity practices is limited. Although we generally have agreements relating to cybersecurity and data privacy in place with third parties, we cannot guarantee that such agreements will prevent a cyber-attack or other information or security breach impacting our confidential, proprietary, personal, or other information, or enable us to obtain adequate or any reimbursement from such third parties in the event we should suffer any disruption, compromise, failure, liability, reputational harm, or other cost or expense. Due to applicable laws and regulations or contractual obligations, we may be held responsible for cyber-attacks or other information or security breaches attributed to such third parties as they relate to the information we share with them.

Cyber-attacks or other information or security breaches, whether directed at us or third parties, may result in a material loss or have material consequences. Furthermore, the public perception that a cyber-attack or other information or security breach on our systems or infrastructure has been successful, whether or not this perception is correct, may damage our reputation with customers, clients, and third parties with which we do business. Hacking of confidential, proprietary, personal, and other information and identity theft risks, in particular, could cause serious reputational harm. A successful penetration or circumvention of our cybersecurity measures could cause us serious negative consequences, including: loss of customers, clients, and business opportunities; costs associated with maintaining business relationships after a cyber-attack or other information or security breach; significant business disruption to our operations and business, misappropriation, exposure, or destruction of our confidential, proprietary, personal, and other information, intellectual property, funds, and/or those of our customers or clients; or damage to our, our customers’, our clients’, and/or third parties’ systems or infrastructure. The occurrence of any of these events could result in a violation of applicable data privacy laws and regulations and other laws and regulations, litigation exposure, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, loss of confidence in our cybersecurity measures, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensatory costs, additional compliance costs, and could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition. In addition, we may not have adequate insurance coverage to compensate for losses from a major cyber-attack or other information or security breach.

35

We also cannot be sure that our existing insurance coverage will continue to be available on acceptable terms or at all or that our insurers will not deny coverage to any future claim.

The increasing use of social media platforms presents new risks and challenges and the inability or failure to recognize, respond to, and effectively manage the accelerated impact of social media could materially adversely impact the Bank’s business.

There has been a marked increase in the use of social media platforms, including weblogs (blogs), social media websites, and other forms of internet-based communications which allow individuals’ access to a broad audience of consumers and other interested persons. Social media practices in the banking industry are evolving, which creates uncertainty and risk of noncompliance with regulations applicable to the Bank’s business. Consumers value readily available information concerning businesses and their goods and services and often act on such information without further investigation and without regard to its accuracy. Many social media platforms immediately publish the content their subscribers and participants’ post, often without filters or checks on accuracy of the content posted. Information posted on such platforms at any time may be adverse to the Bank’s interests and/or may be inaccurate. The dissemination of information online could harm the Bank’s business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations, regardless of the information’s accuracy. The harm may be immediate without affording the Bank an opportunity for redress or correction.

Other risks associated with the use of social media include improper disclosure of proprietary information, negative comments about the Bank’s business, exposure of personally identifiable information, fraud, out-of-date information, and improper use by employees, directors and customers. The inappropriate use of social media by the Bank’s customers, directors or employees could result in negative consequences such as remediation costs, remedial training for employees, additional regulatory scrutiny and possible regulatory penalties, litigation, or negative publicity that could damage the Bank’s reputation adversely affecting customer or investor confidence.

STRATEGIC RISKS

Our growth has substantially increased our expenses and impacted our results of operations.

Although we believe that our growth-oriented business strategy will support our long-term profitability and franchise value, the expense associated with our growth, including compensation expense for the employees needed to support this growth and leasehold and other expenses associated with our locations, has and may continue to negatively affect our results. In addition, in order for our existing branches to contribute to our long-term profitability, we will need to be successful in attracting and maintaining cost-efficient deposits at these locations. In order to successfully manage our growth, we need to effectively execute policies, procedures and controls to maintain our credit quality and oversee our operations. We can provide no assurance that we will be successful in this strategy.

Our growth-oriented business strategy could be adversely affected if we are not able to attract and retain skilled employees.

We may not be able to successfully manage our business as a result of the strain on our management and operations that may result from growth. Our ability to manage growth will depend upon our ability to continue to attract, hire and retain skilled employees, and we may need to adopt additional equity plans in order to do so. Our success will also depend on the ability of our officers and key employees to continue to implement and improve our operational and other systems, to manage multiple, concurrent customer relationships and to hire, train and manage our employees.

36

We depend on our executive officers and key personnel to continue the implementation of our long-term business strategy and could be harmed by the loss of their services.

We believe that our continued growth and future success will depend in large part on the skills of our management team and our ability to motivate and retain these individuals and other key personnel. The loss of service of one or more of our executive officers or key personnel could reduce our ability to successfully implement our long-term business strategy, our business could suffer, and the value of our stock could be materially adversely affected. Leadership changes will occur from time to time, and we cannot predict whether significant resignations will occur or whether we will be able to recruit additional qualified personnel. We believe our management team possesses valuable knowledge about the banking industry and that their knowledge and relationships would be very difficult to replicate. Our success also depends on the experience of our branch managers and lending officers and on their relationships with the customers and communities they serve. The loss of these key personnel could negatively impact our banking operations. The loss of key personnel could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or operating results.

RISKS RELATED TO THE REGULATION OF OUR INDUSTRY

We are subject to significant government regulation, which could affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to extensive governmental supervision, regulation and control. The Company is subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve, and the Bank is subject to regulation and supervision by the FDIC and the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance. These laws and regulations are subject to change and may require substantial modifications to our operations or may cause us to incur substantial additional compliance costs. In addition, future legislation and government policy could adversely affect the commercial banking industry and our operations. Such governing laws can be anticipated to continue to be the subject of future modification. Our management cannot predict what effect any such future modifications will have on our operations.

Changes to laws and regulation applicable to the financial industry, may impact the profitability of our business activities and may change certain of our business practices, including the ability to offer new products, obtain financing, attract deposits, make loans, and achieve satisfactory interest spreads, and could expose us to additional costs, including increased compliance costs. These changes also may require us to invest significant management attention and resources to make any necessary changes to operations in order to comply and could therefore also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The federal and state laws and regulations applicable to our operations give regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement responsibilities, and generally have been promulgated to protect depositors and the Deposit Insurance Fund and not for the purpose of protecting stockholders. Laws and regulations now affecting us may be changed at any time, and the interpretation of such laws and regulations by bank regulatory authorities is also subject to change.

The USA PATRIOT and Bank Secrecy Acts require financial institutions to develop programs to prevent financial institutions from being used for money laundering and terrorist activities. If such activities are detected, financial institutions are obligated to file suspicious activity reports with the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. These rules require financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and verifying the identity of customers seeking to open new financial accounts. Failure to comply with these regulations could result in fines or sanctions, including restrictions on conducting acquisitions or establishing new branches. During the last year, several banking institutions have received large fines for non-compliance with these laws and regulations. While we have developed policies and procedures designed to assist in compliance with these laws and regulations, these policies and procedures may not be effective in preventing violations of these laws and regulations.

37

We can give no assurance that future changes in laws and regulations or changes in their interpretation will not adversely affect our business. Legislative and regulatory changes may increase our cost of doing business or otherwise adversely affect us and create competitive advantage for non-bank competitors.

Our lending limit may restrict our growth.

We are limited in the amount we can loan to a single borrower by the amount of our capital. Generally, under current law, we may lend up to 15% of our unimpaired capital and surplus, including capital notes, to any one borrower. Based upon our current capital levels, the amount we may lend is less than that of many of our larger competitors and may discourage potential borrowers who have credit needs in excess of our lending limit from doing business with us. We may accommodate larger loans by selling participations in those loans to other financial institutions, but this ability may not always be available.

The Federal Reserve may require the Company to commit capital resources to support the Bank.

Federal law requires that a holding company act as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support such subsidiary bank. Under the “source of strength” doctrine, the Federal Reserve may require a holding company to make capital injections into a troubled subsidiary bank and may charge the holding company with engaging in unsafe and unsound practices for failure to commit resources to a subsidiary bank. A capital injection may be required at times when the holding company may not have the resources to provide it and therefore may require the holding company to borrow the funds or raise capital. Thus, any borrowing or capital raised to make a capital injection becomes more difficult and expensive and could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We are subject to the Community Reinvestment Act and fair lending laws, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to material penalties.

The CRA, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act and other fair lending laws and regulations impose nondiscriminatory lending requirements on financial institutions. A successful regulatory challenge to an institution’s performance under the CRA or fair lending laws and regulations could result in a wide variety of sanctions, including the required payment of damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, imposition of restrictions on mergers and acquisitions activity and restrictions on expansion. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution’s performance under fair lending laws in private class action litigation. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Impairment of goodwill could require charges to earnings, which could result in a negative impact on our results of operations.

Our goodwill could become impaired in the future. If goodwill were to become impaired, it could limit the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Company, adversely impacting the Company’s liquidity and ability to pay dividends or repay debt. Assumptions affecting our goodwill impairment evaluation include earnings projections, the discount rates used in the income approach to measure fair value, and observed peer multiples used in estimating the fair value under the market approach. We are required to test goodwill for impairment at least annually or when impairment indicators are present. If an impairment determination is made in a future reporting period, our earnings and book value of goodwill will be reduced by the amount of the impairment. If an impairment loss is recorded, it will have little or no impact on the tangible book value of our common stock, or our regulatory capital levels, but such an impairment loss could significantly reduce the Bank’s earnings and thereby restrict the Bank’s ability to make dividend payments to us without prior regulatory approval, which in turn could impact our ability to pay dividends. At December 31, 2024, the book value of our goodwill was $14.4 million, all of which was recorded at the Bank. Any such write down of goodwill or other acquisition related intangibles will reduce the Company’s earnings, as well.

38

Item 2. Properties

We conduct our operations from our headquarters and branch located at 183 Bayard Lane, Princeton, New Jersey, an operations center at 403 Wall Street, Princeton, New Jersey, and from 34 other branch locations in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Bank’s properties as of December 31, 2024:

40

41

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time the Company is a defendant in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. However, in the opinion of management of the Company, there are no proceedings pending to which the Company is a party or to which its property is subject, which, if determined adversely to the Company, would be material in relation to the Company’s profits or financial condition, nor are there any proceedings pending other than ordinary routine litigation incident to the business of the Company. In addition, no material proceedings are pending or are known to be threatened or contemplated against the Company by government authorities or others.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

42

PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

The Company’s common stock trades on the “NASDAQ Global Select Market” under the ticker symbol “BPRN.” As of March 7, 2025, there were approximately 1,268 holders of our common stock.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during the three-month period ended December 31, 2024.

Dividends

The Company declared and paid cash dividends of $0.30 per share in each quarter for the year ended December 31, 2024. The payment of dividends to shareholders of the Company is dependent on the Bank paying dividends to the Company. The Bank may pay dividends as declared from time to time by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available, subject to certain restrictions. Under the New Jersey Banking Act of 1948, as amended, the Bank may not pay a cash dividend unless, following the payment, the Bank’s capital stock will be unimpaired and the Bank will have a surplus of no less than 50.0 percent of the Bank’s capital stock or, if not, the payment of the dividend will not reduce the surplus. In addition, the Bank cannot pay dividends in amounts that would reduce the Bank’s capital below regulatory imposed minimums.

Under Pennsylvania law, the Company may not pay a dividend, if, after giving effect thereto, it would be unable to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business and, after giving effect to the dividend, the total assets of the Company would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed, if the Company were to be dissolved at the time of distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of shareholders whose rights are superior to those receiving the dividend.

It is also the policy of the Federal Reserve that a bank holding company generally may only pay dividends on common stock out of net income available to common shareholders over the past twelve months and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with a bank holding company’s capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition. A bank holding company also should not maintain a dividend level that places undue pressure on the capital of such institution’s subsidiaries, or that may undermine the bank holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength for such subsidiaries.

43

Performance Graph

The following graph demonstrates comparison of the cumulative total returns for the common stock of the Company, NASDAQ Composite Index, SNL Mid-Atlantic Bank Index, and Peer Group made up of banks and thrifts with total assets between $1.00 billion and $3.00 billion for the periods indicated. The graph below represents $100 invested in our Bank’s common stock at its closing price on December 31, 2019.

Peer group includes Banks and Thrifts with total assets between $1B – $3B

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence

© 2025

44

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table summarizes our equity compensation plan information as of December 31, 2024. See Note 16 “Stock-Based Compensation” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of the material features of each plan.

Item 6.

[Reserved]

45

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is presented in sections as follows:

Overview and Strategy

We remain focused on establishing and retaining customer relationships by offering a broad range of traditional financial services and products, competitively priced and delivered in a responsive manner to small businesses, to professionals and individuals in our market area. As a community bank, we seek to provide superior customer service that is highly personalized, efficient and responsive to local needs. To better serve our customers, we endeavor to provide state-of-the-art delivery systems with ATMs, current operating software, timely reporting, online bill pay and other similar up-to-date products and services. We seek to deliver these products and services with the care and professionalism expected of a community bank and with a special dedication to personalized customer service.

Our primary business objectives are:

We also intend to continue pursuing a strategy that includes acquisitions. An acquisition strategy involves significant risks, including the following: finding suitable candidates for acquisition; attracting funding to support additional growth within acceptable risk tolerances; maintaining asset quality; retaining the target’s customers and key personnel; obtaining necessary regulatory approvals; conducting adequate due diligence and managing known and unknown risks and uncertainties; integrating acquired businesses; and maintaining adequate regulatory capital. The market for acquisition targets is highly competitive, which may adversely affect our ability to find acquisition candidates that fit our strategy and standards.

We strive to serve the financial needs of our customers while providing an appropriate return to our stockholders, consistent with safe and sound banking practices. We expect that a financial strategy that utilizes variable rates and matching assets and liabilities will enable us to increase our net interest margin, while managing interest rate risk. We also seek to generate fee income from various sources, subject to our desire to maintain competitive pricing within our market area.

46

Our recognition of, and commitment to, the needs of the local community, combined with highly personalized and responsive customer service, differentiates us from our competition. We continue to capitalize upon the personal contacts and relationships of our organizers, directors, stockholders and officers to establish and grow our customer base.

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023

General.

Total assets were $2.34 billion at December 31, 2024, an increase of $423.7 million, or 22.11% when compared to $1.92 billion at the end of 2023. The primary reasons for the increase in total assets were the acquisition of CFC on August 23, 2024, which had approximately $303.5 million in assets at closing, and increases from existing core operations.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents decreased $33.2 million, or 22.06%, to $117.3 million at December 31, 2024 compared to December 31, 2023.

Investment securities

Total available-for-sale investment securities increased million $155.8, or 170.57%, to $247.2 million at December 31, 2024 compared to December 31, 2023. This increase was related to the purchase of mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government sponsored enterprises, and U.S government agency securities, along with $14.0 million in securities acquired in the CFC acquisition during the year ended December 31, 2024.

Loans

Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs, increased $270.5 million, or 17.47%, to $1.82 billion at December 31, 2024 compared to December 31, 2023. The primary reasons for the increase in net loans were the $255.5 million in loans acquired from CFC and a $15.0 million increase from existing operations. The increase in the Company’s net loans consisted of increases of $242.2 million in commercial real estate loans, $41.9 million in commercial and industrial loans, $30.0 million in residential mortgages, and $10.1 in home equity and consumer loans, all partially offset by a decrease of $53.0 million in construction loans.

The Company’s CRE loan portfolio, which includes multi-family, land, owner-occupied and non-owner-occupied CRE loans, was $1.39 billion or 76.1% of total loans of $1.82 billion at December 31, 2024. There were 774 loans in the Company’s CRE portfolio with an average and median loan size of $1.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively. LTV estimates are less than 70% for $1.27 billion or 92.1% of the CRE portfolio and less than 80% for $1.37 billion or 99.3% of the CRE portfolio.

47

The following table presents the commercial real estate portfolio by property type along with the weighted average loan to value for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):