Exhibit 5.5

[Letterhead of Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP]

RE: Royal Bank of Canada – Structured Warrants

We have acted as Canadian counsel to Royal Bank of Canada (the “Bank”) in connection with the issue by the Bank from time to time of certain structured warrants (the “Warrants”) pursuant to the distribution agreement dated October 19, 2018, as amended on November 26, 2021 (the “Distribution Agreement”), relating to the Bank’s Structured Warrants (such series of securities being hereinafter referred to as the “Series”), to be issued pursuant to the warrant indenture dated as of October 19, 2018 (the “Indenture”), between the Bank and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (the “Trustee”).

We have reviewed or participated in the preparation of the following:

We understand that the Registration Statement and the Program Prospectus were filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) in connection with the Series and that one or more pricing supplements relating to the applicable Warrants will be filed with the Commission in connection with the Warrants.

For the purposes of our opinions below, we have examined such statutes, public and corporate records, certificates and other documents, and considered such questions of law, as we have considered relevant and necessary as a basis for the opinions hereinafter set forth. In such examination we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures and the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, and the conformity to original documents of all documents submitted to us as certified or photostatic copies or facsimiles. We have also assumed that the statements in each certificate of the Bank that has been delivered to us on or prior to the date hereof with respect to the Warrants shall be accurate and correct as of each issue date of the Warrants. For the purposes of the opinions expressed herein, we have, without independent investigation or verification, assumed that the Indenture has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by, and constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of, each party thereto other than the Bank. We have also assumed that the statements in any certificate of the Bank that has been delivered to us on or prior to the date hereof with respect to the Warrants are and shall be accurate and correct as of each issue date of the Warrants. We have not received written notice from the Bank of any change to the matters set out in any such certificate.

With respect to the continuing existence of the Bank as a Schedule I bank under the Bank Act (Canada) referred to in paragraph 1 below, we have relied, without independent investigation or verification, exclusively upon a Certificate of Confirmation dated December 18, 2023 issued by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions.

In giving this opinion, we express no opinion as to any laws other than the laws, at the date hereof, of the Provinces of Ontario and Québec and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein. We also express no opinion as to whether the issuance, sale and delivery of the Warrants or any contract or other document relating thereto are in compliance with the Charter of the French Language (Québec).

Based and relying upon and subject to the qualifications set forth herein, we are of the opinion that:

such Warrants will be validly issued and, to the extent validity of the Warrants is a matter governed by the laws of the Provinces of Ontario or Québec, and the laws of Canada applicable therein, valid obligations of the Bank; and

The opinions set forth herein as to the validity of the Warrants and the enforceability of the Indenture and the Warrants are subject to the following qualifications:

If a pricing supplement relating to the offer and sale of particular Warrants is prepared and filed by the Bank with the Commission on a date after the date hereof and such pricing supplement contains a reference to Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP and our opinion substantially in the form set forth below, the consent set forth below shall apply to the reference to us and our opinion in substantially the following form:

In the opinion of Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, as Canadian counsel to the Bank, the issue and sale of the Warrants has been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action of the Bank in conformity with the Indenture, and when the Warrants have been duly executed, authenticated and issued in accordance with the Indenture and delivered against payment therefor, the Warrants will be validly issued and, to the extent validity of the Warrants is a matter governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario or Québec, or the federal laws of Canada applicable therein, will be valid obligations of the Bank, subject to the following limitations: (i) the enforceability of the Indenture may be limited by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation Act (Canada), the Winding-up and Restructuring Act (Canada) and bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, receivership, moratorium, arrangement or winding-up laws or other similar laws of general application affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally; (ii) the enforceability of the Indenture is subject to general equitable principles, including the principle that the availability of equitable remedies, such as specific performance and injunction, may only be granted at the discretion of a court of competent jurisdiction; (iii) under applicable limitations statutes generally, including that the enforceability of the Indenture will be subject to the limitations contained in the Limitations Act, 2002 (Ontario), and such counsel expresses no opinion as to whether a court may find any provision of the Indenture to be unenforceable as an attempt to vary or exclude a limitation period under such applicable limitations statutes; (iv) rights to indemnity and contribution under the Warrants or the Indenture which may be limited by applicable law; and (v) courts in Canada are precluded from giving a judgment in any currency other than the lawful money of Canada and such judgment may be based on a rate of exchange in existence on a day other than the day of payment, as prescribed by the Currency Act (Canada).  This opinion is given as of the date hereof and is limited to the laws of the Provinces of Ontario and Québec and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein. In addition, this opinion is subject to customary assumptions about the Trustee’s authorization, execution and delivery of the Indenture and the genuineness of signatures and to such counsel’s reliance on the Bank and other sources as to certain factual matters, all as stated in the opinion letter of such counsel dated December 20, 2023, which has been filed as Exhibit 5.5 to Royal Bank’s Form 6-K filed with the SEC dated December 20, 2023.

The opinions expressed herein are provided solely for the benefit of the addressee in connection with the issue of the Warrants and are not to be transmitted to any other person, nor are they to be relied upon by any other person or for any other purpose or referred to in any public document or filed with any government agency or other person without our prior express consent. The opinions expressed herein may be relied upon by Ashurst LLP for the purposes of its opinion with respect to the subject matter hereof.

We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Bank’s Report of Foreign Private Issuer on Form 6-K. In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required by the Act or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

Yours very truly,

---

Exhibit 5.6

We are acting as special US counsel to Royal Bank of Canada, a Canadian chartered bank (the "Bank"), in connection with its issuance from time to time of certain structured warrants (the "Warrants").  The offerings of the Warrants have been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), under a registration statement on Form F-3, file number 333-275898 (the “Registration Statement”).

The Warrants will be issued pursuant to the Indenture, dated as of October 19, 2018 (the “Indenture”), between the Bank and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.

For purposes of this opinion, we have reviewed originals or copies of the following documents:

(1)	the Registration Statement;

(2)	the Indenture;

(3)	the form of master security (the “Master Security”) that will represent the Warrants.

We have also reviewed such other documents and made such other investigation as we have deemed appropriate for purposes of the opinion below.

In our review, we have, with your consent, assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the legal capacity of natural persons, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, the accuracy of translations of documents that are not in the English language and the conformity to originals of all documents submitted to us as copies.

Based on the foregoing, and subject to the qualifications set forth herein, we are of the opinion that  when the terms of the Warrants to be issued under the Indenture and their issuance and sale have been duly established in conformity with the Indenture so as not to violate any applicable law or result in a default under or breach of any agreement or instrument binding upon the Bank, and so as to comply with any requirement or restriction imposed by any court or governmental body having jurisdiction over the Bank, and when the Warrants have been duly completed in accordance with the Indenture and issued and sold as contemplated by the Registration Statement, and if all the foregoing actions have been duly authorized by the Bank, the Warrants will be valid, binding and enforceable obligations of the Bank, entitled to the benefits of the Indenture.

In rendering the foregoing opinion, we are not passing upon, and assume no responsibility for, any disclosure in the Registration Statement, any other registration statement or any related prospectus or other offering materials relating to the Bank or the Warrants or their offering and sale.

If a pricing supplement relating to the offer and sale of any particular Warrant is prepared and filed by the Bank with the Commission on a future date and the pricing supplement contains a reference to this firm and our opinion substantially in the form set forth below, the consent set forth below in this opinion shall apply to the reference to us and our opinion substantially in the form set forth below:

In the opinion of Ashurst LLP, when the Warrants have been duly completed in accordance with the Indenture and issued and sold as contemplated by the prospectus supplement and the prospectus, the Warrants will be valid, binding and enforceable obligations of the Bank, entitled to the benefits of the Indenture, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws of general applicability relating to or affecting creditors' rights and subject to general principles of equity, public policy considerations and the discretion of the court before which any suit or proceeding may be brought. This opinion is given as of the date hereof and is limited to the laws of the State of New York.  This opinion is subject to customary assumptions about the Trustee’s authorization, execution and delivery of the Indenture and the genuineness of signatures and to such counsel’s reliance on the Bank and other sources as to certain factual matters, all as stated in the legal opinion dated December 20, 2023, which has been filed as Exhibit 5.6 to the Bank’s Form 6-K dated December 20, 2023.

The foregoing opinion is subject to the following additional qualification:

(A)            The validity or enforceability of any agreement is subject to the effect of applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws of general applicability relating to or affecting creditors' rights and subject to general principles of equity, public policy considerations and the discretion of the court before which any suit or proceeding may be brought (regardless of whether enforcement is considered in a proceeding in equity or law).

(B)            We express no opinion as to the enforceability of (i) any waiver of trial by jury; (ii) any indemnity against any loss in converting into a specified currency the proceeds or amount of a court judgement in another currency; or (iii) any provision specifying that any provision of the Indenture or the Master Security may only be waived in writing.

(C)            We express no opinion as to provisions in the Indenture and the Master Security which purport to constitute waivers of objections to venue, or claims that a particular jurisdiction is an inconvenient forum.

For purposes of expressing the foregoing opinion, we have, with your consent, assumed that: (1) the Bank is duly formed and validly existing under the laws of its jurisdiction of formation; (2) the Bank has the corporate and other power to execute, deliver and perform the Indenture and the Master Security and has taken all corporate and other action necessary to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of the Indenture and the Master Security; (3) each of the parties to the Indenture and the Master Security has duly authorized, executed and delivered such documents under all applicable laws (other than, with respect to the Bank, New York State law) and each of the Indenture and the Master Security is a legal, valid and binding obligation of each party thereto (other than, with respect to the Bank, to the extent we have opined on such matters in our opinion set forth above, enforceable against each party in accordance with its terms; (4) the execution and delivery by the Bank of the Indenture and the Master Security does not, and the performance by the Bank of its obligations thereunder will not, violate its charter or by-laws or similar corporate documents; (5) the Bank has duly performed and will duly perform its covenants and agreements in the Indenture and the Master Security; and (6) the status of each of the Indenture and the Master Security as a valid and binding obligation is not affected by any breach or default under any agreement or instrument, any failure to obtain any required approval from or make any filings with any governmental authority or third party or any violation of rule, regulation or law (other than, with respect to the Bank, New York state law, rules and regulations that in our experience would be generally applicable to transactions of the type contemplated by the Indenture and the Master Security, provided we express no opinion on any law rule or regulation that is applicable to the Bank or the Indenture or the Master Security solely because such law, rule or regulation is part of a regulatory regime applicable to any party to the Indenture or the Master Security or any of its affiliates due to the specific assets or business of such party or such affiliate).

The opinion expressed herein is limited to New York State law and we express no opinion as to the effect of the law of any other jurisdiction.  We express no opinion as to the validity, binding effect or enforceability of Section 301(b) of the Indenture (and the corresponding provisions of the Warrants issued thereunder), which is governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein.  Various matters concerning the laws of Canada are addressed in the opinion of Canadian counsel which is an Exhibit to a Form 6-K that is being filed by the Bank with the Commission.  We express no opinion with respect to those matters, and to the extent elements of those opinions are necessary to the opinion expressed herein, we have, with your consent, assumed the correctness of such matters, and have relied upon the opinions of such counsel as permitted by such opinion. The opinion expressed herein is given only as of the date hereof.

We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed by the Bank with the Commission on or about the date hereof and its incorporation by reference into the Registration Statement.  In giving our consent hereunder, we do not admit hereby that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act, or the rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder.

---

Exhibit 23.6

Royal Bank of Canada, a bank organized under the laws of Canada (the “Bank”), has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) a Registration Statement on Form F-3, file number 333-275898, for the purpose of registering under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, among other securities, the Company’s Structured Warrants. The Warrants will be issued pursuant to the Indenture, dated as of October 19, 2018, between the Bank and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.

We hereby consent to any reference to us, in our capacity as special tax counsel to the Bank, or any opinion of ours delivered in that capacity in a product supplement, product prospectus supplement or pricing supplement relating to the offer and sale of any particular Warrants prepared and filed by the Bank with the Commission on this date or a future date.

In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act.

---

Exhibit 23.7

Re: Royal Bank of Canada – Structured Warrants

Royal Bank of Canada, a bank organized under the laws of Canada (the “Bank”), is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) a registration statement on Form F-3, file number 333-275898, for the purpose of registering under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, among other securities, the Bank’s Structured Warrants (the “Warrants”), to be issued from time to time pursuant to the warrant indenture dated as of October 19, 2018, between the Bank and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee.

We hereby consent to any reference to us, in our capacity as Canadian tax counsel to the Bank, or any opinion of ours delivered in that capacity in a product supplement, product prospectus supplement or pricing supplement relating to the offer and sale of any particular Warrants prepared and filed by the Bank with the Commission on this date or a future date.

In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

---