Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

​

FORM 20-F

(Mark One)

☐ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

☐ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

​

For the transition period from                                     to                                     

​

Commission file number 001-40709

ARDAGH METAL PACKAGING S.A.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Luxembourg

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

56, rue Charles Martel

L-2134 Luxembourg, Luxembourg

+352 26 25 85 55

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

​

​

Stefan Schellinger

Chief Financial Officer

56, rue Charles Martel, L-2134 Luxembourg, Luxembourg

+352 26 25 85 55

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

​

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

Table of Contents

None.

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.

None.

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:

597,699,586 Ordinary Shares, par value €0.01 per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act:

Yes   ☐           No  ☒

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes  ☐           No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☒           No ☐ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

Yes ☒           No ☐ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

​

Large Accelerated Filer ☐Accelerated Filer ☒   

Non-Accelerated Filer ☐Emerging growth company ☐

​

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b))     by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to § 240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

​

Table of Contents

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17  ☐         Item 18 ☐

​

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

Yes  ☐         No ☒

​

​

​

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

​

​

​

Table of Contents

Definitions and Terminology

Except where the context otherwise requires or where otherwise indicated, all references to “AMPSA,” the “Group,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

References to legislation are, except where otherwise stated, references to the legislation of the United States of America.

In addition, unless otherwise indicated, or the context otherwise requires, references in this annual report on Form 20-F (the “Annual Report”) to:

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

General Information

AMPSA was incorporated under the laws of Luxembourg on January 20, 2021 as a public limited liability company (société anonyme) having its registered office at 56, rue Charles Martel, L‑2134 Luxembourg, Luxembourg and registered with the Luxembourg Register of Commerce and Companies (Registre de Commerce et des Sociétés de Luxembourg) under number B 251465.

The Company has direct and indirect ownership of 100% of the issued share capital of holding companies which hold all of our principal finance and operating subsidiaries.

On November 13, 2025, the Company announced that on November 12, 2025, AGSA reported that it had completed a comprehensive recapitalization transaction in respect of certain debt of AGSA and its affiliates (the “Recapitalization Transaction”). As part of the Recapitalization Transaction, a debt-for-equity swap was effected pursuant to which certain holders of AGSA’s and its affiliates’ indebtedness acquired indirect ownership of AGSA through AHSA.  Following completion of the Recapitalization Transaction, the ultimate controlling company of AMPSA is AHSA, which indirectly owns approximately 76% of our Ordinary Shares.

In connection with the Recapitalization Transaction, ARD Finance S.A., the previous parent company of AGSA, commenced a judicial reorganization proceeding in Luxembourg under Luxembourg Restructuring Law of 7 August 2023 on the preservation of businesses and the modernization of bankruptcy law in respect of its senior secured toggle notes due 2027 (the “Toggle Notes”). This process has been opened by the Luxembourg courts and remains on-going.

In January 2026, certain minority holders of the Toggle Notes have initiated proceedings against (among others) AGSA before the district court of Luxembourg, challenging certain steps taken in respect of the Recapitalization Transaction. AGSA strongly believes that the complaint is without merit and has stated it intends to vigorously defend against the proceedings.

For more information see “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and development of the Company”.

Table of Contents

Group Consolidated Financial Statements – Basis of Preparation

The consolidated financial statements of the Group have been prepared in accordance with, and are in compliance with, IFRS® Accounting Standards and related interpretations as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). IFRS Accounting Standards are comprised of standards and interpretations approved by the IASB, and standards and interpretations approved by the predecessor International Accounting Standards Committee that have been subsequently approved by the IASB and remain in effect. References to IFRS Accounting Standards hereafter should be construed as references to IFRS Accounting Standards as issued by the IASB.

The audited consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollar, rounded to the nearest million and have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for the following:

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS Accounting Standards requires the use of critical accounting estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and income and expenses. It also requires management to exercise judgment in the process of applying Group accounting policies. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances and are subject to continual re-evaluation. However, actual outcomes may differ from these estimates. The areas involving a higher degree of judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the audited consolidated financial statements, are discussed in critical accounting estimates, assumptions and judgments in note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.

Currencies

In this Annual Report, unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires:

Safe Harbor Statement

This Annual Report does not constitute an offer for sale or subscription of or solicitation or invitation of any offer to buy or subscribe for any securities, including in the United States, and, except to the extent this Annual Report is incorporated by reference into the Company’s registration statement on Form F-3, as amended, this Annual Report shall not be deemed to form part of any such offer, solicitation or invitation.  Specifically, this Annual Report does not constitute a “prospectus” within the meaning of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

Table of Contents

We routinely post important information on our website https://www.ardaghmetalpackaging.com/investors. This website and any other websites referenced herein and the information contained therein or connected thereto shall not be deemed to be incorporated into this Annual Report.

Market and Industry Data

Within this Annual Report, we reference information and statistics obtained from independent third-party sources. While we believe such information is reliable, we have not independently verified any third-party information.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report contains estimates and “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements are not historical facts and are inherently subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which may be beyond our control. Forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from expectations. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “may,” “plan,” “estimate,” “intend,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” and the negatives of these words and other similar expressions generally identify forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements in this Annual Report are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments, and other factors we believe are appropriate in the circumstances.

It is possible that actual events could differ materially from those made in or suggested by the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report from our current expectations and projections about future events at the time due to a variety of factors including, but not limited to, the following:

Table of Contents

In addition, new risk factors and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all risk factors and uncertainties, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual events to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Therefore, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. While we continually review trends and uncertainties affecting our results of operations and financial condition, we do not assume any obligation to update or supplement any particular forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report.

Table of Contents

Non-IFRS Financial Measures

This Annual Report contains certain consolidated financial measures such as Adjusted EBITDA, working capital, net debt, and ratios relating thereto that are not calculated in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards or Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). Adjusted EBITDA consists of profit/(loss) for the year before income tax expense/(credit), net finance expense, depreciation and amortization and exceptional operating items.

Non-IFRS financial measures may be considered in addition to IFRS financial information, but should not be used as substitutes for the corresponding IFRS financial measures. The non-IFRS financial measures used by AMPSA may differ from, and not be comparable to, similarly titled measures used by other companies.

Part I

Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

Not Applicable

Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

Not Applicable

Item 3. Key Information

A.Reserved

B.Capitalization and indebtedness

Not Applicable

C.Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds

Not Applicable

D.Risk Factors

Our business is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects and that are described below. In addition, you should consider the interrelationship and compounding effects of two or more risks occurring simultaneously.

Summary Risk Factors

The following summarizes the material risks that could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. You should carefully consider all the information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 20-F including, but not limited to, the risks set forth in this “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors.” Our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks.

​

Table of Contents

Risks Relating to Our Business, Products and Industry

Risks Relating to Our Supply Chain

Risks Relating to Economic, Market and Political Matters

Risks Relating to Our Employees and Operations

​

​

Table of Contents

Risks Relating to our Information Technology Systems

Risks Relating to Legal and Regulatory Matters

Other

For a more complete discussion of the material risks facing our business, see below.

Risks Relating to Our Business, Products and Industry

An increase in metal beverage packaging manufacturing capacity, including that of our competitors, without a corresponding increase in demand for metal beverage packaging could cause prices to decline or result in the curtailment or closure of certain of our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The profitability of metal beverage packaging companies is heavily influenced by the supply of, and demand for, metal beverage packaging. We, and certain of our major competitors, have recently undertaken significant and long-term metal beverage packaging capacity expansions in the United States, Europe and Brazil. Such expansions may produce, and have produced in certain localities, excess supply if the demand for metal beverage packaging is weaker than anticipated, and the prices we receive for our products could decline or result in the curtailment or closure of certain of our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

Table of Contents

We cannot assure you that metal beverage packaging manufacturing capacity in any of our markets, including the capacity of our competitors, will not increase further in the future, nor can we assure you that demand for metal beverage packaging will meet or exceed supply.

We face competition from other metal beverage packaging producers, as well as from manufacturers of alternative forms of packaging.

The sectors in which we operate are relatively mature and competitive. Prices for the products manufactured by us are primarily driven by raw material costs. Competition in the market is based on price, as well as on innovation, sustainability, design, quality and service. Increases in productivity, combined with potential surplus capacity from recent or planned new investment in the industry, could result in pricing pressures in the future. Our principal competitors include Ball Corporation, Crown Holdings and CANPACK, and some of our competitors may have greater financial, technical or marketing resources, or may have more desirably located, newly installed or excess capacity. See “—An increase in metal beverage packaging manufacturing capacity, including that of our competitors, without a corresponding increase in demand for metal beverage packaging could cause prices to decline or result in the curtailment or closure of certain of our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business” for a further discussion on the impact of excess capacity in our market. To the extent that any one or more of our competitors becomes more successful with respect to any key competitive factor, our ability to attract and retain customers could be materially adversely affected. Moreover, changes in the global economic environment could result in reductions in demand for our products in certain instances, which could increase competitive pressures. The occurrence of any of the aforementioned events, among others, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. See “—Risks Relating to Economic, Market and Political Matters—Changes to the economic, political, credit, and/or financial environment in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business, such as affecting consumer demand for beverage products, which could impact our customers and as a result, reduce the demand for our products” for a further discussion on the impact of the global economic environment on our business.

In addition, we are subject to substantial competition from producers of packaging made from plastic, glass, carton and composites, for example, PET bottles for carbonated soft drinks. Changes in consumer preferences in terms of packaging materials, style and product presentation or a decrease in the costs of alternative packaging products can significantly influence sales, and there can be no assurance that our products will successfully compete against alternative packaging products. An increase in consumer demand for alternative packaging could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

Certain of our customers meet some of their metal beverage packaging requirements through self-manufacturing, which reduces their external purchases of packaging. For example, AB InBev manufactures metal beverage packaging through its affiliate, Metal Container Corporation in the United States, as well as directly in Brazil, and Molson Coors manufacture metal beverage packaging through their joint arrangement, Rocky Mountain Metal Container Corporation in the United States, which they operate with Ball Corporation, who also recently announced the acquisition of a majority shareholding in Benepack, a beverage can manufacturer in Europe, expected to complete in 2026. The potential of further vertical integration of our customers could introduce new production capacity in the market, which may create an imbalance between metal beverage packaging supply and demand and could have a material adverse effect on our future performance.

Table of Contents

As our customers are concentrated, our business could be materially adversely affected if we were unable to maintain relationships with our largest customers.

Our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 57% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025. While we believe that we have good relationships with these customers, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain these relationships. Over 80% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025 was backed by multi-year supply agreements, ranging from two to seven years in duration. Although these arrangements have provided, and we expect they will continue to provide, the basis for long-term partnerships with our customers, there can be no assurance that our customers will not cease to purchase our products. These arrangements, unless they are renewed, expire in accordance with their respective terms and may be terminated under certain circumstances, such as our failure to meet quality, volume or other contractual commitments. In addition, if our customers unexpectedly reduce the amount of metal beverage packaging they purchase from us, cease purchasing our metal beverage packaging altogether, or if there are any changes in their strategic choices, such as whether to prioritize price or volume requirements, our revenues could decrease and our inventory levels could increase, both of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. Further, customer concentration could expose us to increased credit risk if our large customers are unable to fulfill their payment obligations to us.

In addition, there can be no assurance that such arrangements will be renewed upon their expiration or that the terms of any renewal will be as favorable to us as the terms of the current arrangements, and there is also the risk that our customers may shift their filling operations to locations in which we do not operate. The loss of one or more of these customers, a significant reduction in sales to these customers, or a significant change in the commercial terms of our relationships with these customers could have a material adverse effect on our business.

A significant write-down of goodwill could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our goodwill as of December 31, 2025 was $1 billion. We evaluate goodwill annually or whenever indicators suggest that impairment may have occurred. The determination of the recoverable amounts of goodwill requires the use of a market approach, which includes estimates and assumptions which are based on comparable companies’ equity valuations. The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results. As described further in the audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report, we use the fair value less costs of disposal (“FVLCD”) model for the purposes of our annual goodwill impairment testing. However, if an impairment indicator exists for a cash generating unit (“CGU”), we also use the value in use (“VIU”) model in order to establish the recoverable amount being the higher of the FVLCD model and VIU model when compared to the carrying value of the CGU. Sensitivity analysis is performed reflecting potential variations in assumptions. Future changes in the estimates and assumptions used in the FVLCD or VIU models, general market conditions, or other factors may cause our goodwill to be impaired, resulting in a non-cash charge against results of operations to write-down goodwill for the amount of the impairment. If a significant write-down is required, the charge could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

Demand for our products is seasonal. Unseasonal weather conditions, including as a result of climate change, could lead to unpredictable demand and materially adversely affect our business.

Demand for our products is seasonal and strongest during spring and summer, which means that our sales in North America and Europe are typically, based on historical trends, greater in the second and third quarters of the year and generally lower in the first and fourth quarters. In Brazil, sales are typically strongest in the first and fourth quarters and generally lower in the second and third quarters. However, demand for our products during the quarters with historically greater sales could be reduced if there is unseasonably cool weather in any of these regions.

Table of Contents

Unseasonable weather could become a more frequent occurrence as a result of climate change, which could have an adverse effect on demand for our products. The occurrence of any such events leading to unpredictable demand could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. See “—Risks Relating to Legal and Regulatory Matters—Climate change may adversely affect our ability to conduct our business, including the availability and cost of resources required for our production processes” for a more detailed discussion of the ability of extreme weather events to potentially adversely impact our business.

Changes in consumer lifestyle, nutritional preferences, health-related concerns and warnings, health-related drug development, social media influence and consumer taxation could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Changes in consumer demographics, preferences and tastes, including as a result of social media influence, can have an impact on demand for our customers’ products, such as beer, which in turn can lead to reduced demand for our products. Our ability to develop new product offerings for a diverse group of global customers with differing preferences, while maintaining functionality and spurring innovation, is critical to our success. This requires a thorough understanding of our existing and potential customers and end-users on a global basis, particularly in developing or emerging markets. Failure to adapt and deliver quality products that meet our customers’ or end-users’ needs, through research and development or licensing of new technology, ahead of our competitors, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

In addition, public health and government officials have become increasingly concerned about the health consequences associated with over-consumption of certain types of beverages, such as alcoholic and sugar-sweetened beverages, including those produced by certain of our customers. For example, the U.S. Surgeon General released an advisory statement during 2025 in respect of alcoholic beverages and preventable cancer risks, calling attention to this as a public health issue, which could result in a decrease in demand for those end-products that our customers produce and the World Health Organization has recently released global reports calling on governments to significantly strengthen taxes on sugary drinks and alcoholic beverages. Furthermore, France and the United Kingdom have introduced taxes on drinks with added sugar and artificial sweeteners that companies produce or import. France has also imposed taxes on energy drinks using certain amounts of taurine and caffeine. As a result of such taxes, demand has decreased in these countries, and the publication of similar public health warnings, imposition of similar health-related taxes on end-products, or changes to public policy programs such as food assistance in the U.S., in the future may lower the demand for certain alcoholic beverages and soft drinks that our customers produce, which may as a result cause our customers to reduce their purchases of our products. In addition, the development of appetite suppressant drugs or weight loss medication may change the demand for certain types of beverages. Any decline in the popularity of any end-products due to lifestyle, nutrition or health considerations, or our inability to adapt to customer needs, could have a significant impact on our customers and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

Further consolidation of our customer base may intensify pricing pressures or result in the loss of customers, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Some of our largest customers have acquired companies with similar or complementary product lines in recent years. For example, in 2025 Celsius made two acquisitions, purchasing Alani Nu in April 2025 and the Rockstar Energy brand in the U.S. and Canada from PepsiCo as part of a strategic partnership in August 2025. Separately, in January 2025, Carlsberg acquired Britvic. Prior customer consolidations include the acquisition of Ghost by Keurig Dr Pepper and of Bang Energy by Monster Beverage in 2023; Brasil Kirin by Heineken in 2017 and AB InBev acquired SABMiller in 2016. Such consolidation activities resulted in an increase in the concentration of our sales with our largest customers and if similar consolidations should occur in the future, it could potentially be accompanied by pressure for lower prices. Increased pricing pressures from these customers may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. In addition, any consolidation of our customers may lead to their reliance on a reduced number of suppliers. If, following the combination of one of our customers with another company, a competitor was to be the main supplier to the newly consolidated company, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or prospects.

Table of Contents

Risks Relating to Our Supply Chain

Our profitability could be adversely affected by the availability and increase in the costs of raw and other input materials, including as a result of changes in tariffs and duties.

We use various raw and other input materials, such as aluminum, in our production. The availability and price of various raw and other input materials depends on global and local supply and demand forces, governmental regulations, level of production, resource availability, transportation and other factors. No assurance can be given that we would be able to secure our raw and other input materials from sources other than our current suppliers on terms as favorable as our current terms, or at all. The cost of any of the principal raw or input materials that we use may also significantly increase as a result of any tariff increases, sanctions, duties, transportation disruptions or delays, or other trade actions. Any such shortages, transportation disruptions or increases in cost could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. Further, the U.S. has signaled its intention to pursue changes to U.S. trade policy, including potentially renegotiating or terminating existing trade agreements and leveraging or expanding tariffs. In February 2025, the U.S. announced both the increase of tariffs on aluminum and the implementation of tariffs on goods from Canada and Mexico, though the latter was subsequently paused. These tariff actions, as well as potential retaliation by another government against such tariffs or policies, could significantly affect the price of aluminum and other raw materials we use, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

The primary raw material that we use is aluminum, which is, in turn, rolled into coils of sheet aluminum by our suppliers for use in our production process. Our business is exposed to both the availability of aluminum and the volatility of aluminum prices, including associated premia. Aluminum is traded daily as a commodity on the London Metal Exchange, which has historically been subject to significant price volatility. Because aluminum is priced in U.S. dollars, fluctuations in the U.S. dollar/euro rate also affect the euro cost of aluminum. See “—Risks Relating to Economic, Market and Political Matters—Currency, interest rate and commodity price fluctuations may have a material impact on our business” for a detailed description on the currency risks associated with the price volatility of aluminum. While in the past sufficient quantities of aluminum have been generally available for purchase, these quantities may not be available in the future, and, even if available, we may not be able to continue to purchase them at current prices and/or other comparable terms. In addition, any increase in the level of investment in metal beverage packaging capacity expansion by us and our competitors will require a significant increase in sheet aluminum production by the suppliers, which will in turn require them to make significant investment and capital expenditures. Failure by the suppliers to increase capacity could cause supply shortages and significant increases in the cost of aluminum.

While raw materials are generally available from a range of suppliers, they are subject to fluctuations in price and availability based on a number of factors, including general economic conditions, commodity price fluctuations (such as with respect to aluminum on the London Metal Exchange), the demand by other industries, such as automotive, aerospace and construction, for the same raw materials and the availability of complementary and substitute materials. Furthermore, adverse political, economic or financial changes, industrial disputes, financial distress, pandemic-related, weather-related and energy- or utilities-related supply disruptions could impact our suppliers, thereby causing supply shortages or increasing costs for our business. Our raw materials suppliers also operate in relatively concentrated industries, and this concentration can impact raw material costs. Over the last ten years, the number of major aluminum suppliers has decreased and there is a possibility of further consolidation. Further consolidation could hinder our ability to obtain adequate supplies of these raw materials and could lead to higher prices for aluminum. In addition, the relative price of oil and its by-products could also impact our business, by affecting other input materials costs, such as coatings, lacquer and ink. Accordingly, the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and the related economic sanctions, and political tension and conflicts in the Middle East and other oil producing regions could have a material adverse effect on our operating costs, and in turn, our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

Table of Contents

Matters —Changes to the economic, political, credit, and/or financial environment in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business, such as affecting consumer demand for beverage products, which could impact our customers and as a result, reduce the demand for our products” for more details.

See “—Risks Relating to Economic, Market and Political Although a significant number of our sales contracts with customers include provisions enabling us to pass through increases and reductions in certain input costs, such as aluminum and coatings, we may not be able to pass on all or substantially all raw material and other input price increases or increase our prices to offset increases in raw and other input material costs without suffering reductions in unit volume, revenue and operating income. The perceived certainty of supply at our competitors may also put us at a competitive disadvantage regarding pricing and product volumes. In addition, we may not be able to hedge successfully against raw material cost increases. See “—Risks Relating to Economic, Market and Political Matters—Currency, interest rate and commodity price fluctuations may have a material impact on our business” for a more detailed description on hedging risks associated with commodity prices. Any of the above factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

We are dependent on a reliable and affordable supply of energy, and any shortage of energy supplies to our production facilities or increased energy prices could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We require access to reliable sources of affordable energy as certain energy sources are vital to our operations and we rely on a continuous power supply to effectively conduct our business. The ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and the related sanctions have led to a significant increase in our energy and other input costs, and there may be further adverse impacts on energy supplies and prices, particularly in Europe, as a result of uncertainty with regard to Russia’s production and export of oil and natural gas, or from political tension and conflicts in the Middle East and other oil producing regions. See “—Risks Relating to Economic, Market and Political Matters—Changes to the economic, political, credit and/or financial environment in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business, such as affecting consumer demand for beverage products, which could impact our customers and as a result, reduce the demand for our products” for more details.

In the event of energy shortages, we may not be able to meet our energy needs. This could lead to production stoppages, shutdowns, a decline in output, and decreased sales. In the event of a prolonged shortfall of adequate energy supplies, we could experience financial distress. In addition, any future increases or fluctuations in energy costs could result in a significant increase in our operating costs, and if we are not able to recover these costs from our customers, or through fixed-price procurement contracts, index tracking procurement contracts and hedging there could be a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

We are reliant on the performance of our suppliers, who may not be able to meet our demands due to supply chain disruption.

We are reliant on our suppliers for the timely delivery of raw materials, such as aluminum for the production of our metal beverage packaging. We also engage third parties for the supply of various services, including, among others, logistics services for the transport of our metal beverage packaging and IT services. If one or more of our suppliers is unable or unwilling to fulfil delivery obligations, for example, due to shortages of necessary raw materials, elevated energy prices or energy shortages, production or operational failures, external conflicts, labor shortages or strikes, capacity allocation to other customers, financial distress, insolvency, government regulations, currency rate fluctuations, natural disasters and adverse weather conditions that are exacerbated by climate change, or other unforeseen circumstances, we could be at risk of production downtime, inventory backlogs and delays in deliveries to customers. The risk of financial distress for our suppliers could become more acute if energy prices increase, or if energy supplies are threatened. As a result, we may need to bear increased costs for such services or to find alternative providers, which may not be available on comparable or suitable terms, or at all. In addition, such suppliers could provide services that do not meet our requirements or fail to provide services in a timely manner, which could cause us to experience disruptions, delays, or product quality issues. If any of the foregoing risks were to materialize, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or prospects.

Table of Contents

Risks Relating to Economic, Market and Political Matters

Changes to the economic, political, credit, and/or financial environment in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business, such as affecting consumer demand for beverage products, which could impact our customers and as a result, reduce the demand for our products.

Demand for our packaging depends on demand for the products that use our packaging, which is primarily consumer driven and dependent on general economic conditions. Such macroeconomic conditions can be strongly influenced by geo-political events such as war, insurrection and other such conflicts between nations and state actors and can arise with little warning. Deteriorating general economic conditions may adversely impact consumer confidence resulting in reduced spending on our customers’ products and, thereby, reduced or postponed demand for our products. Any adverse economic conditions may also lead to a limited availability of credit, which could have an adverse effect on the financial condition, particularly on the purchasing ability of some of our customers and distributors. This may result in requests for extended payment terms, credit losses, finished goods obsolescence, insolvencies and diminished available sales channels. Deteriorating general economic conditions could also have an adverse impact on our suppliers, causing them to experience financial distress or insolvency, and jeopardizing their ability to provide timely deliveries of raw materials and other essentials to us, which could in turn have material adverse effects on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. Furthermore, such changes in general economic conditions as described above, among others, may reduce our ability to forecast developments in our industry and plan our operations and costs accordingly, resulting in operational inefficiencies.

Recent events that have had a significant impact on macroeconomic conditions around the world include the changes in trade policies and new and increased tariffs by the United States, the Russia-Ukraine war, political tension and conflicts in the Middle East, the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting disruption to the global supply chain and the cost-of-living crises in countries around the world. The ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and the sanctions and export-control measures instituted by the United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom, among others, against Russian and Belarussian persons and entities in response have contributed to heightened inflationary pressures (including increased prices for oil and natural gas), market volatility and economic uncertainty, particularly in Europe, which have affected our business. Government measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant decline in business activity around the world. Inflation rates began rising significantly in the European Union, the United States, the United Kingdom and Brazil in late 2021, remained at high levels through 2022 and 2023 and while inflation rates have declined since then, national inflation rates continue to be monitored very closely for volatility by central banks. Sustained high prices and actions taken by central banks and other state actors to combat rising inflation rates could further undermine economic growth, contribute to regional or global economic recessions, cause declines in consumer spending and confidence and increase borrowing costs, among other effects, each of which could materially adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. See “—Risks Relating to Our Capital Structure—Our substantial debt could adversely affect our financial health and our ability to effectively manage and grow our business” for a detailed discussion on the impact of changes in global economic conditions on our ability to raise new financing or refinance our existing borrowings. The slowdown of the global economy could lead to volatility in exchange rates that could increase the costs of our products. See “—Risks Relating to Economic, Market and Political Matters—Currency, interest rate and commodity price fluctuations may have a material impact on our business” for a further discussion on how this volatility could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Any economic downturn or recession, lower than expected growth, rising inflation or an otherwise uncertain economic outlook, either globally or in the markets in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

Currency, interest rate and commodity price fluctuations may have a material impact on our business.

Our functional currency is the euro and we present our financial information in U.S. dollars. Insofar as possible, we actively manage currency exposures through the deployment of assets and liabilities throughout the Group. Our policy is, where practical, to match net investments in foreign currencies with borrowings and swaps in the same currency.

Table of Contents

When necessary and economically justified, we enter into currency hedging arrangements to manage our exposure to currency fluctuations by hedging against exchange rate changes. However, we may not be successful in limiting such exposure, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. In addition, our presented results may be impacted because of fluctuations in the U.S. dollar exchange rate versus the euro.

We have metal beverage packaging production facilities in nine different countries, and sell products to, and obtain raw materials from, entities located in these and different regions and countries globally. As a result, a significant portion of our consolidated revenue, costs, assets and liabilities are denominated in currencies other than the euro, in particular, the U.S. dollar, the British pound and the Brazilian real. For the year ended December 31, 2025, 74% of our revenue was from countries with currencies other than the euro. The exchange rates between the currencies which we are exposed to have fluctuated significantly in the past and may continue to do so in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Volatility in exchange rates could increase the costs of our products such that we may not be able to pass on the cost to our customers or could impair the purchasing power of our customers in different markets. Such events could result in significant competitive benefit to certain of our competitors that incur a material part of their costs in different currencies than we do, hamper our pricing, increase our hedging costs and limit our ability to hedge our exchange rate exposure. Furthermore, we are exposed to currency transaction risks, where changes in exchange rates affect our ability to purchase equipment and raw materials and sell products at profitable prices, reduce the value of our assets and revenues and increase liabilities and costs.

We are also exposed to interest rate risk, where fluctuations in interest rates may affect our interest expense on existing debt, the cost of new financing or refinancing existing debt. While we principally use fixed rate debt and cross currency interest rate swaps to manage this type of risk, sustained increases in interest rates could nevertheless materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. See “—Risks Relating to Our Capital Structure—Our substantial debt could adversely affect our financial health and our ability to effectively manage and grow our business” for a further discussion on how increases in interest rates could affect our ability to service our indebtedness.

We are also subject to commodity price risk, mainly as a result of fluctuations in the price and availability of raw materials and energy, such as aluminum, natural gas, electricity and diesel. We use fixed price supply and derivative agreements to manage some of the material commodity cost risk. Aluminum has historically been subject to significant price volatility, and as aluminum is priced in U.S. dollars, fluctuations in the U.S. dollar/euro rate also affect the euro cost of aluminum. Where we are unable to pass through increases in certain input costs to our customers, we operate hedging programs to manage the price and foreign currency risk on our aluminum purchases, but increased prices for aluminum could affect customer demand. See “—Risks Relating to Our Supply Chain—Our profitability could be adversely affected by the availability and increase in the costs of raw and other input materials, including as a result of changes in tariffs and duties” for more information on the availability and cost of aluminum.

We have an active hedging strategy to fix a significant proportion of our energy costs through contractual arrangements directly with our suppliers. Our policy is to purchase natural gas and electricity by entering into forward price-fixing arrangements with suppliers for the majority of our anticipated requirements for the year ahead and for further diminishing portions of our anticipated requirements for subsequent years. Such contracts are used exclusively to obtain delivery of our anticipated energy supplies. We do not trade nor look to profit from such activities. We avail ourselves of the own use exemption and, therefore, these contracts are treated as executory contracts. We also occasionally hedge portions of our natural gas, electricity and diesel price risk by entering into derivatives with banks, where it is deemed favorable versus hedging with suppliers. Any natural gas, electricity and diesel that is not purchased under forward fixed price arrangements or hedged with banks is purchased under index tracking contracts or at spot prices. However, there can be no assurance that our strategies will prove effective, given that there are certain circumstances that are beyond our control, such as increased market volatility as a result of the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, or political tension and conflicts in the Middle East and other oil producing regions. See “—Risks Relating to Economic, Market and Political Matters—Changes to the economic, political, credit, and/or financial environment in which we operate could have a material For a further discussion of these matters and the measures we have taken to seek to protect our business against these risks, see “Item 5.

Table of Contents

adverse effect on our business, such as affecting consumer demand for beverage products, which could impact our customers and as a result, reduce the demand for our products” for further details. Our costs could be adversely impacted to the extent we are unable to counteract the effects of the aforementioned risks effectively.

Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

Pandemics or disease outbreaks, as well as governmental mandates and restrictions attributable thereto, have had, and in the future may have, an adverse impact on worldwide economic activity and our business.

Pandemics or disease outbreaks, as well as measures enacted to prevent their spread, including restrictions on travel, imposition of quarantines and prolonged closures of workplaces and other businesses, including hospitality, leisure and entertainment outlets, and the related cancelation of events, have impacted and may impact our business in the future in several ways. For example, the various governmental lockdown mandates and other restrictive measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic between 2020 and 2022 reduced global economic activity, which resulted in lower demand for certain of our customers’ products and, therefore, the products we manufacture, although demand for “at-home” consumption increased and therefore demand for many of our customers’ products increased. As a result, the sales of our products proved to be resilient during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the COVID-19 pandemic had an adverse effect on our operations, including disruptions to our supply chain and workforce and the incurrence of increased costs. The impact of any pandemic or disease outbreaks on capital markets could also increase our cost of borrowing. In addition, our customers, distribution partners, service providers or suppliers may experience financial distress, file for bankruptcy protection, go out of business, or suffer disruptions in their businesses due to any future pandemic or disease outbreaks, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. There can be no assurance that any future pandemics or disease outbreaks will not have a material adverse effect on global economic activity and on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

Risks Relating to Our Employees and Operations

Any interruption in the operations of our production facilities, including infrastructure failure from physical damage, may adversely affect our business.

All of our manufacturing activities take place at production facilities that we own or lease under long-term leases. Our manufacturing processes include cutting, coating and shaping aluminum into containers. These processes, which are conducted at high speeds and involve operating heavy machinery and equipment, entail risks and hazards, including industrial accidents, leaks and ruptures, explosions, fires, mechanical failures and environmental hazards, such as spills, storage tank leaks, discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances and gases. Our production facilities also depend on essential utilities, such as electricity, gas, and water. Furthermore, certain of our production facilities are located in geographically vulnerable areas, including in some parts of the United States, and the risk of the occurrence of these hazards is exacerbated by the increasing frequency of extreme weather-related events, such as floods, windstorms and wildfires as well as natural disasters, such as earthquakes. Such hazards could directly, as well as indirectly, impact our production facilities, for example, by affecting the availability of national infrastructure, such as road networks and electrical power grids, that we are reliant upon. These hazards, or disruption to utility services, may cause unplanned business interruptions, unscheduled downtime, transportation interruptions, personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to or the destruction of property and equipment, environmental contamination and other environmental damage, civil, criminal and administrative sanctions and liabilities, and third-party claims, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or prospects.

In addition, it may be increasingly difficult to obtain, renew or maintain permits and authorizations issued by governmental authorities necessary to operate our production facilities, due to the increasing urbanization of the sites where some of them are located.

Table of Contents

Urbanization could lead to more stringent operating conditions for obtaining or renewing the necessary authorizations, the refusal to grant or renew these authorizations, or expropriations of these sites for urban planning projects, any of which could result in the incurrence of significant costs, with no assurance of partial or full compensation from the governmental authorities.

Even though we conduct regular maintenance on our operating equipment, due to the extreme operating conditions inherent in some of our manufacturing processes, we cannot assure you that we will not incur unplanned business interruptions due to equipment breakdowns or similar manufacturing problems. We could also experience disruption to our IT systems and other automated manufacturing processes, including through cybersecurity attacks, which could halt or severely reduce production. See “—Risks Relating to our Information Technology Systems—Our heavy reliance on technology and automated systems to operate our business could mean that any significant failure or disruption of these systems, including as a result of cybersecurity attacks, could have a material adverse effect on our business and reputation” for a further discussion on the impact of a cybersecurity attack on our business. There can be no assurance that alternative production capacity would be readily available in the event of an interruption.

If any of the aforementioned failures or disruptions affect any of our major operating lines or production facilities, it may result in a disruption of our ability to supply customers and a consequent loss of revenues. The potential impact of any disruption would depend on the nature and extent of the damage caused to such facility. For example, our industry’s business model typically involves a metal beverage can ends production facility supplying multiple metal beverage can production facilities. A failure or disruption in an ends production facility could therefore impact our ability to supply multiple customers with ends and any inability to source ends from another location could result in a material loss of sales.

To the extent that we experience production disruptions as a result of any of the aforementioned factors, we may also be required to make unplanned capital expenditures even though we may not have available resources at such time, which would result in significant costs and expenses. As a result, our liquidity may be adversely affected, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or prospects.

Organized strikes or work stoppages by unionized employees could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Many of our operating companies are party to collective bargaining agreements with trade unions, which cover the majority of our employees. A prolonged work stoppage or strike at any facility with union employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. In addition, we cannot ensure that, upon the expiration of our existing collective bargaining agreements, new agreements will be reached without union action or that our operating companies will be able to negotiate acceptable new contracts with trade unions, which could result in strikes by the affected employees and increased operating costs as a result of higher wages or benefits paid to unionized employees. If unionized employees at our operating companies, or our customers or suppliers, were to engage in a strike or other work stoppage, we could experience a significant disruption of operations, higher ongoing labor costs and reputational harm, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

​

We depend on our executive and senior management as well as other highly skilled personnel, and our operations may be disrupted if we are unable to retain or motivate such personnel.

We depend on our experienced executive team, who are identified under “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees,” members of senior management, and other key and skilled personnel. These individuals possess manufacturing, sales, marketing, technical, financial and other specialized skills that are critical to the operation of our business. The loss of services of one or more of the members of our executive team, members of senior management or other key and skilled personnel, or the failure to provide adequate succession plans for such personnel could adversely affect our operations, decision-making processes, core values and organizational behavior, and competitiveness until suitable replacements can be found. Moreover, the hiring of qualified individuals in our industry is highly competitive and there may be a limited number of persons with the requisite skills and experience to serve in these positions, for example, where recruiting for replacements with similar expertise in can-making may not always be possible for our production facility-based roles.

Table of Contents

Our business may also suffer from various disruptions if we experience high levels of staff turnover across our business, or if our personnel do not adapt effectively to any adjustments or changes that we might make to our operating model. There can be no assurance that we would be able to locate, employ or retain required qualified personnel on terms acceptable to us, or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of our operations, cash flows or prospects.

We face costs and future funding obligations associated with post-retirement benefits provided to employees, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

As of December 31, 2025, our accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation, net of employee benefit assets, was approximately $137 million covering our employees in multiple jurisdictions. The costs associated with these and other benefits to employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

We operate and contribute to pension and other post-retirement benefit schemes (including both single employer and multiple employer schemes) funded by a range of assets that include property, derivatives, equities and/or bonds. The value of these assets is heavily dependent on the performance of markets, which are subject to volatility. The liability structure of the obligations to provide such benefits is also subject to market volatility in relation to its accounting valuation and management. Additional significant funding of our pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations may be required if market underperformance is severe. Furthermore, for certain of our pension schemes in the United States, under the United States Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, the U.S. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) has the authority to terminate pension plans regulated by the PBGC if certain funding requirements are not met; any such termination would further accelerate the cash obligations related to such a pension plan. In addition, we may have to make significant cash payments to some or all of these plans, including under guarantee agreements, in the future to provide additional funding, which would reduce the cash available for our business.

We may not be able to integrate acquisitions effectively.

There is no certainty that any acquired business will be effectively integrated. If we cannot successfully integrate acquired businesses within a reasonable time frame, we may not be able to realize the cost savings, synergies and revenue enhancements that we anticipate either in the anticipated amount or time frame, and the costs of achieving these benefits may be higher than, and the timing may differ from, what we expected. Our ability to realize anticipated cost savings and synergies may be affected by a number of factors, including the use of more cash or other financial resources on integration and implementation activities than we expect, such as restructuring and other exit costs, unanticipated conditions imposed in connection with obtaining required regulatory approvals, and increases in expected acquisition costs and expenses, which may offset the cost savings and other synergies realized from such acquisitions. To the extent we pursue an acquisition that causes us to incur unexpected costs or that fails to generate expected returns, or fail to successfully integrate such businesses, the diversion of management attention and other resources from our existing operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

​

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

Risks Relating to our Information Technology and Operational Technology Systems

Our heavy reliance on technology and automated systems to operate our business could mean that any significant failure or disruption of these systems, including as a result of cybersecurity attacks, could have a material adverse effect on our business and reputation.

We depend on automated systems, including cloud-based service providers, and technology to operate our business, including manufacturing, production planning, logistics, accounting, telecommunication and information technology systems. There can be no assurance that these systems will not fail or suffer from substantial or repeated disruptions due to various events, some of which are beyond our control, such as natural disasters, power failures, terrorist attacks, equipment or software failures, user errors or computer viruses. Any such disruptions could severely interrupt the operation of our production facilities for an extended period of time, which could have an adverse effect on the supply of our products and result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or prospects.

Increased global cybersecurity threats and more sophisticated and targeted computer crime, including through the use of AI enabled attacks, also pose a potentially significant risk to the security of our systems and networks and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of our data, as well as the confidential data of our employees, customers, suppliers and other third parties that we may hold. As the cyber-threat landscape evolves, these attacks are growing in frequency, sophistication and intensity, including as a result of the use of AI by threat actors. Due to the nature of some of these attacks, there is also a risk that they may remain undetected for a period of time. We have previously been the target of cyberattacks and expect such attempts to continue. In 2021, AGSA announced that it had experienced a cybersecurity incident, the response to which included temporarily shutting down certain IT systems and applications used by us. There can be no assurance that our cybersecurity program will protect us from such threats and prevent disruptions or breaches to our or our third-party providers’ databases or systems that could materially adversely affect our business. See “Item 16K. Cybersecurity” for a further description of our cybersecurity program.

In addition, certain services under our cybersecurity program are provided by AGSA pursuant to the Services Agreement. There can be no assurance that we will be able to find a replacement provider for such services on comparable terms or at all, if such services are no longer provided under the Services Agreement. See “—Risks Relating to the Services Agreement—Our ability to operate our business effectively depends largely on certain administrative and other support functions provided to us by AGSA pursuant to the Services Agreement, which may suffer if we are unable to establish our own administrative and other support functions in a cost effective manner following the termination of the Services Agreement” for a further discussion of the Services Agreement.

Substantial or repeated systems failures or disruptions, including as a result of not effectively remediating system failures, cybersecurity incidents and other disruptions could result in the unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information, improper use of our systems and networks, defective products, harm to individuals or property, contractual or regulatory actions and fines, penalties and potential liabilities, production downtime and operational disruptions and loss or compromise of important or sensitive data. For example, the loss, disclosure, misappropriation of or access to our employees’ or business partners’ information or our failure to meet increasing data privacy, security and incident disclosure obligations could result in lost revenue, increased costs, future legal claims or proceedings, including class actions, liability or regulatory actions or penalties, including, for instance, under the EU General Data Protection Regulation, the UK General Data Protection Regulation, the California Consumer Privacy Act or the SEC’s rules on cybersecurity risk management strategy, governance and incidence disclosure. The adoption of AI technologies could aggravate these risks by increasing the risk that information is inadvertently or maliciously compromised. Any of the aforementioned risks could result in increased costs, lost revenue, reputational harm and decreased competitiveness, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or prospects, and increased global cybersecurity threats and more sophisticated and targeted computer crime may further increase this risk.

Table of Contents

The increasing adoption of AI  tools and systems in our operations introduces new risks related to governance, oversight, and responsible usage.

Ineffective AI governance or insufficient usage controls may result in the unauthorized deployment of AI technologies, unintended exposure of sensitive data, generation of inaccurate or misleading outputs, breaches of regulatory or contractual compliance, failures to meet privacy obligations, and reputational harm. As AI capabilities evolve, the complexity and potential impact of these risks may increase, particularly in relation to data protection, intellectual property, and ethical standards. Failure to implement robust AI governance frameworks, usage policies, and monitoring mechanisms could expose us to regulatory investigations, legal claims, operational disruptions, and loss of stakeholder trust, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

Risks Relating to Legal and Regulatory Matters

We are subject to various environmental and other legal requirements and may be subject to additional requirements that could impose substantial costs on us.

Our operations and properties are subject to extensive laws, ordinances, regulations and other legal requirements relating to the protection of people and the environment. The laws and regulations which may affect our operations include requirements regarding remediation of contaminated soil, groundwater and buildings, water supply and use, natural resources, water discharges, air emissions, waste management, noise pollution, asbestos and other deleterious materials, the generation, storage, handling, transportation and disposal of regulated materials, product safety, food safety, and workplace health and safety. See “—We are subject to extensive, complex and evolving legal and regulatory frameworks and changes in laws and government regulations and their enforcement may have a material impact on our operations” for a discussion of the product and food safety regulations that are applicable to us and “—Risks Relating to Our Employees and Operations—Any interruption in the operations of our production facilities, including infrastructure failure from physical damage, may adversely affect our business” for a discussion of the risks related to workplace health and safety. These laws and regulations are also subject to constant review by lawmakers and regulators which may result in further, including more stringent, environmental or health and safety legal requirements.

We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, costs to comply with such legal requirements, and these costs may increase in the future. Demands for more stringent pollution control devices could also result in the need for further capital upgrades to our production facilities. For example, under the EU Industrial Emissions Directive (Directive 2010/75/EU) (“EU IED”), permitted pollutant emissions levels from our production facilities are substantially reduced on a periodic basis. EU member states may continue to introduce lower permitted pollutant emissions levels into national legislation and impose stricter limits in the future. In the United States, certain states are continuing to establish lower permitted pollutant emissions levels, which may require us to incur potentially significant compliance costs. California, in particular, has set ambitious GHG reduction goals, which may result in higher offset purchase prices in the future. Additionally, some municipalities in California are considering further regulations to reduce or potentially eliminate natural gas usage. Additional pollutant or GHG emissions control schemes may be introduced in any jurisdiction on a national and/or local level, which may require additional measures. Further, in order to comply with air emission restrictions, significant capital investments may be necessary at some sites.

We also require a variety of permits to conduct our operations, including operating permits such as those required under various U.S. laws, including the federal Clean Air Act, and the EU IED water and trade effluent discharge permits, water abstraction permits and waste permits. We are in the process of applying for, or renewing, permits at a number of our sites. Failure to obtain and maintain the relevant permits, as well as non-compliance with such permits, could result in criminal, civil and administrative sanctions and liabilities, including substantial fines and orders, or a partial or total shutdown of our operations, as well as litigation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

Table of Contents

Furthermore, changes to the laws and regulations governing the materials that are used in our production facilities may impact the price of such materials or result in such materials no longer being available. For example, the European Union Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (“REACH”) regulations impose stringent obligations on the manufacturers, importers and users of chemical substances. Certain substances that we use in our manufacturing process may be required to be removed from the market under REACH’s authorization and restriction provisions or substituted for alternative substances. Any of the foregoing could adversely impact our operations and result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

In addition, our sites often have a long history of industrial activities and may be, or have been in the past, engaged in activities involving the use of materials and processes that could give rise to contamination and result in potential liability to investigate or remediate, as well as claims for alleged damage to persons, property or natural resources. These legal requirements may apply to contamination at sites that we currently or formerly owned, occupied or operated, or that were formerly owned, occupied or operated by companies we acquired or at sites where we have sent waste to third-party sites for treatment or disposal. There can be no assurance that our due diligence investigations identified or accurately quantified all material environmental matters related to the facilities that we acquired and liability for remediation of any third-party sites may be established without regard to whether the party disposing of the waste was at fault or the disposal activity was legal at the time it was conducted. If we are designated as a potentially responsible party for the clean-up and remediation of any sites, including any “Superfund” sites in the United States, this could impose significant costs on us and result in reputational damage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

Climate change may adversely affect our ability to conduct our business, including the availability and cost of resources required for our production processes.

The impact of climate change, arising from the rising level of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases (“GHGs”) in the atmosphere presents immediate and long-term risks to us and the markets in which we operate, which are expected to increase over time. Climate risks consist of physical risks and transition risks, either of which may materially adversely affect our ability to conduct our business. Our operations could be exposed to physical risks resulting from chronic and acute climate change and more frequent extreme weather-related events, such as heatwaves, drought, heavy rainfall, wildfires, windstorms including hurricanes and tornadoes, or floods, which may directly damage our physical assets (such as facilities and materials) or otherwise impact their value or productivity, cause raw material shortages (including energy supply) and supply chain disruptions (including delivery), and increase production cost and health and safety risks, among other risks. See “—Risks Relating to Our Employees and Operations—Any interruption in the operations of our production facilities, including infrastructure failure from physical damage, may adversely affect our business” for a further discussion on the impact such damage to our physical assets could have on our business. In addition, unseasonal extreme weather can reduce demand for certain beverages, and as a result, our products. See “—Risks Relating to Our Business, Products and Industry—Demand for our products is seasonal. Unseasonal weather conditions, including as a result of climate change, could lead to unpredictability of demand and materially adversely affect our business” for a more detailed discussion on the impact of unseasonable weather on demand for our products. We are not able to accurately predict the materiality of any potential losses or costs associated with the effects of climate change, and the impact of climate change may also vary by geographic location and other circumstances, including weather patterns.

We could also be exposed to transition risks resulting from changes in policy, technology and market preference to address climate change, such as carbon pricing policies, including increased prices for certain fuels, including natural gas and the introduction of a carbon tax, and power generation shifts from fossil fuels to renewable energy, which may lead to changes in the value of assets. In addition, measures to address climate change through laws and regulations, for example by requiring reductions in emissions of GHGs or introducing compliance schemes, could create economic risks and uncertainties for our businesses, by increasing GHG-related costs, such as the cost of abatement equipment to reduce emissions to comply with legal requirements on GHG emissions or required technological standards, or reducing demand for our products, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. We also monitor rules and regulations related to environmental, social and corporate governance (“ESG”) disclosure obligations, which may expose us to increased costs associated with such additional reporting obligations and risks associated with any non-compliance.

Table of Contents

For example the European Union adopted the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (“CSRD”) in 2023. Subsequently, in 2025, the European Commission published a proposed omnibus agreement aimed at simplifying sustainability reporting in Europe. This proposal included change to the scope of the CSRD and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (“CSDDD”), as well as to the content of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (“ESRS”). Amendments to CSRD and CSDDD were published in the Official Journal of the EU in February 2026, which will enter into force in March 2026, with the next step being transposition into national law by EU member states. The changes to the ESRS are expected to be finalized in 2026. See “—We are subject to various environmental and other legal requirements and may be subject to additional requirements that could impose substantial costs upon us” for a more detailed discussion on the risks to our business associated with the introduction of new laws and regulations by governments to combat climate change. Such rules, regulations and reporting requirements are not uniform across jurisdictions, which can increase the complexity and cost of compliance and increase the risk of enforcement or litigation. In 2022, we received approval from the SBTi for our GHG emission reduction targets to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 42% and to reduce absolute Scope 3 emissions by 12.3% by 2030. The vast majority of our Scope 3 emissions principally arise in the various stages of the manufacturing of the aluminum coils that we purchase to produce our products, which depend on various factors that can be difficult to predict and are often outside of our control. Our ability to meet our sustainability targets also depends on market or competitive conditions that are outside our control, as well as expectations and assumptions that are necessarily uncertain. Failure to meet our SBTi targets and reduce our emissions, or failure to meet any of our other sustainability targets, could result in increased costs for us in the form of carbon taxes and could have a material adverse effect our reputation, customer and investor relationships, or ability to access capital on favorable terms, particularly given investors’ focus on ESG matters. Failure to transition to low carbon manufacturing in the future could result in dedicated action by climate activists which could cause reputational damage or business interruption.

​

We are subject to extensive, complex and evolving legal and regulatory frameworks and changes in laws and government regulations and their enforcement may have a material impact on our operations.

Our business operates in multiple jurisdictions and is subject to complex legal and regulatory frameworks, including in relation to product requirement, environmental, anti-trust, economic sanctions, anti-corruption and anti-money laundering matters. For a detailed discussion on the various environmental requirements that we are subject to, please see “—We are subject to various environmental and other legal requirements and may be subject to additional requirements that could impose substantial costs on us.” Laws and regulations in these areas are complex and constantly evolving, and enforcement continues to increase. As a result, we may become subject to increasing limitations on our business activities and risks of fines or other sanctions for non-compliance. Additionally, we may become subject to governmental investigations and lawsuits by private parties. Compliance costs associated with current and proposed laws and potential regulations could be substantial, and any failure or alleged failure to comply with these laws or regulations could lead to litigation or government action, all of which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

For example, changes in laws and regulations relating to deposits on, requirements for re-use, and any limits or restrictions to the recycling of, metal packaging could adversely affect our business if implemented on a large scale in the major markets in which we operate. We anticipate continuing efforts to reform or adopt such laws and regulations in the future. Additionally, the effectiveness of new standards, such as the ones related to recycling or deposits on different packaging materials, could result in excess costs, demand disruption or logistical constraints for some of our customers, who could choose to reduce their consumption and limit the use of metal packaging for their products. We could thus be forced to reduce, suspend or even stop the production of certain types of products. These regulatory changes could also affect our prices, margins, investments and activities, particularly if these changes resulted in significant or structural changes in the market for food and beverage packaging that might affect the market shares for metal packaging, the volumes produced or production costs.

Table of Contents

Changes in laws and regulations imposing restrictions on, and conditions for use of, food and beverage contact materials or on the use of materials and agents in the production of our products could likewise adversely affect our business, such as epoxy-based coatings. Changes in regulatory agency statements, adverse information concerning bisphenol A or rulings made in certain jurisdictions may result in restrictions, for example, on bisphenol A in epoxy-based internal liners for some of our products. Such restrictions have required us, together with our respective suppliers and customers, to develop substitutes for relevant products to meet legal and customer requirements. In addition, changes to health and food safety regulations could increase costs and may also have a material adverse effect on revenues if the public attitude toward end-products, for which we provide packaging, were substantially affected as a result.

Environmental, sustainability, food and beverage health and safety, political and ethical concerns could lead government authorities to implement and strictly enforce other regulations that are likely to impose restrictions on us and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. Given the complexity of our supply chains, we may face reputational challenges if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins of all materials used in the products that we sell or properly address the environmental and human rights impacts of our supply chain. Furthermore, there is significant variation, among countries where we sell our products, in the limitation on certain constituents in packaging, which can have the effect of restricting the types of raw materials we use. In turn, these restrictions can increase our operating costs by requiring increased energy consumption or greater environmental controls.

We could incur significant costs in relation to workplace injury and illness claims at our production facilities arising from our manufacturing processes.

We may face liability claims arising from our manufacturing processes, including alleged personal injury due to workplace injuries and illness at our production facilities. Both the operational profile of our production facilities with its reliance upon machinery as well as the type of activities performed by our employees during the manufacturing process carry an increased risk of accidents. There can be no assurance that the health and safety measures and programs we have implemented will prevent accidents occurring or employees contracting illnesses due to prolonged exposure to workplace hazards, such as hazardous substances, noise, vibrations and stress at our production facilities and injuries from motorized transportation. If an individual successfully brings a claim against us, we may not have adequate insurance to cover such claims or may face increased insurance premiums. See “—Our existing insurance coverage may be insufficient and future coverage may be difficult or prohibitively expensive to obtain” for more details on our insurance coverage. Failure to accurately assess potential risks or assure implementation of effective safety measures may result in increases in the relative frequency or severity of workplace injuries at our production facilities, which may result in increased workers’ compensation claims expense. If our employees or customers perceive us having a poor safety record, it could materially impact our ability to attract and retain new employees and our reputation could suffer. Any substantial increase in such liability claims and related reputational harm could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

Failure of our control measures and systems that result in faulty or contaminated products could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We have strict control measures and systems in place to ensure that the maximum safety and quality of our products is maintained. The consequences of a product not meeting these rigorous standards, due to, among other things, accidental or malicious raw materials contamination or due to supply chain contamination caused by human error or equipment fault, could be severe. Such consequences might include adverse effects on consumer health and our reputation, an increase in our litigation exposure and financial costs, and loss of market share and revenues.

If our products fail to meet rigorous standards or warranties that we provide in certain contracts in respect of our products and their conformity to the specific use defined by the customer, we may be required to incur substantial costs in taking appropriate corrective action (up to and including recalling products from consumers) and to reimburse customers and/or end-users for losses that they suffer as a result of this failure. Customers and end-users may seek to recover these losses through litigation and, under applicable legal rules, may succeed in any such claim, despite there being no negligence or other fault on our part.

Table of Contents

In addition, if our packaging fails to preserve the integrity of its contents, it is possible that the manufacturer of the product may allege that our packaging is the cause of the fault or contamination, even if the packaging complies with contractual specifications. This could result in liability to our customers and to third parties for bodily injury or other tangible or intangible damages suffered as a result. If any of these claims are successful, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

Furthermore, placing an unsafe product on the market, failing to notify the regulatory authorities of a safety issue, failing to take appropriate corrective action and failing to meet other regulatory requirements relating to product safety could lead to regulatory investigation, enforcement action and/or prosecution. Any product quality or safety issue may also result in adverse publicity, which may damage our reputation. This could in turn have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. Although we have not had a regular history of significant or material claims for damages for defective products in the past, and have not conducted any substantial product recalls or other material corrective action, there can be no assurance that these events will not occur in the future.

We may be subject to litigation, arbitration and other proceedings that could have an adverse effect on us.

We are currently involved in various litigation matters, and we anticipate that we will continue to be involved in litigation matters from time to time in the future. The risks inherent in our business expose us to litigation, including personal injury, environmental litigation, contractual litigation with customers and suppliers, intellectual property litigation, cybersecurity related litigation, employment litigation, tax or securities litigation, and product liability lawsuits. We cannot predict with certainty the outcome or effect of any claim, regulatory investigation, or other litigation matter, or a combination of these. Any such litigation, arbitration or other proceedings, current or future, whether with or without merit, could be expensive and time consuming, and could divert the attention of senior management, and any adverse outcome in these or other proceedings, could harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. For more information on our contingencies for legal proceedings, see note 27 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Our existing insurance coverage may be insufficient and future coverage may be difficult or prohibitively expensive to obtain.

Our insurance arrangements are subject to the limitations of certain market capacities and the economics of certain types of cover, and may typically exclude certain risks and are subject to certain thresholds and limits. We cannot assure you that the coverage available will be sufficient to protect us from all possible loss or damage resulting from unforeseen events. As a result, our insurance coverage may prove to be inadequate for events that may cause significant disruption to our operations, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. In addition, we may also suffer indirect losses, such as the disruption of our business or third-party claims of damages, as a result of an insured risk event. While we carry business interruption coverage and general liability coverage, such coverage is subject to certain limitations, thresholds and limits, and may not fully cover all indirect losses.

We renew our insurance arrangements on an annual basis, and the cost of coverage may increase to an extent that we may choose to reduce our coverage limits or agree to certain exclusions from our coverage. Among other factors, adverse political developments, limited insurance market capacity, unfavorable trends of increasing claims and settlements in our industry and business, including the underwriting of emerging risks such as AI, security concerns, and natural disasters in any country in which we operate may reduce the availability of insurance coverage and lead to higher premiums and additional exclusions from coverage.

Table of Contents

If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.

We are required to maintain internal controls over financial reporting and to report any material weaknesses in those controls. If we identify future material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting that is not remediated, or fail to meet our obligations as a listed company, including the requirements of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), we may be unable to accurately report our financial results, or report them within the timeframes required by law or NYSE regulations, which could cause investors to lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our reported financial information, and result in an adverse effect on the market price of our Ordinary Shares and/or the traded price of our notes.

Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we are required to evaluate and determine the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and provide a management report as to internal controls over financial reporting and our independent registered public accounting firm is required to issue an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. Failure to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting also could potentially subject us to investigations or sanctions by the SEC, NYSE or other regulatory authorities, or shareholder lawsuits, which could require additional financial and management resources.

Risks Relating to the Services Agreement

Our ability to operate our business effectively depends largely on certain administrative and other support functions provided to us by AGSA pursuant to the Services Agreement, which may suffer if we are unable to establish our own administrative and other support functions in a cost-effective manner following the termination of the Services Agreement.

We rely on certain administrative and other resources provided by AGSA, including information technology, financial reporting, tax, treasury, investor relations, human resources, procurement, logistics, insurance and risk management and legal services, to operate our business. The services covered by the Services Agreement may not be sufficient to meet our needs and may not be provided at the same level as when we were part of AGSA. If AGSA is unable to satisfy its material obligations under the Services Agreement, or if the Services Agreement is terminated in whole or in part, we may not be able to find a replacement for such services at all, or obtain such services on comparable terms, which could result in operational difficulties and in turn a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects. In addition, any failure or significant interruption of the AGSA’s informational technology systems during the term of the Services Agreement could result in unexpected costs or prevent us from meeting customer needs on a timely basis. See “—Risks Relating to Our Information Technology Systems—Our heavy reliance on technology and automated systems to operate our business could mean that any significant failure or disruption of these systems, including as a result of cybersecurity attacks, could have a material adverse effect on our business and reputation” for a discussion on the possible impact if there is a disruption to information technology systems.

As of December 31, 2025, the Services Agreement automatically renewed for an additional one-year term, with the fees for the services provided to us calculated based on an allocation of the costs associated with such services. The Services Agreement will renew automatically on an annual basis until terminated by either party with a nine-month prior written notice, or by mutual consent of both parties in writing at any time. We cannot provide any assurance that the fees under the Services Agreement will be more favorable than the price that we would have been able to pay if we had obtained such services from one or more third parties. During the period in which the Services Agreement was negotiated, we did not have a board or a management team that was independent of AGSA and the terms of the Services Agreement were agreed while we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of AGSA and in the context that AGSA would own a controlling interest in us following the Merger. In addition, we also cannot provide any assurance that the price of the services, when adjusted, will not be significantly greater than the fixed price established for these services prior to such adjustment.

Table of Contents

Risks Relating to Our Capital Structure

Our substantial debt could adversely affect our financial health and our ability to effectively manage and grow our business.

We have a substantial amount of debt and significant debt service obligations. As of December 31, 2025, we had total borrowings and net debt of $4.5 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively. Some of the agreements under which we borrow funds contain covenants or provisions that impose certain restrictions on us, such as debt ratios and may prevent us from incurring additional debt. For more information, see the description of our debt facilities and the table outlining our principal financing arrangements in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Our substantial debt could have adverse consequences for us and for our shareholders. For example, our substantial debt could:

Further, notwithstanding our current indebtedness levels and restrictive covenants, we may still be able to incur substantial additional debt or make certain restricted payments, which could exacerbate the risks described above.

In addition, pursuant to certain of AGSA’s financing arrangements, the shares of AMPSA are directly pledged for the benefit of certain lenders. In the event of a default under such financing arrangements, the lenders thereunder may have the right to enforce on the security interest over the relevant shares of AMPSA, which may result in a change of control under the terms of certain of our financing arrangements.

Adverse developments in our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects due to deteriorating global economic conditions, increased interest rates or other factors have caused, and could in the future cause ratings agencies to lower the credit ratings, or ratings outlook, of our short- and long-term debt, and, consequently, impair the credit insurance coverage available to our suppliers, impacting our supplier terms, and potentially our ability to raise new financing or refinance our current borrowings and increase our costs of issuing any new debt instruments. See “—Risks Relating to Economic, Market and Political Matters—Currency, interest rate and commodity price fluctuations may have a material impact on our business” for a further discussion on interest rate risk and the potential increase to our cost of borrowing. Additionally, a significant weakening of our financial position or operating results due to changes in global economic conditions or other factors could result in non-compliance with our restrictive covenants in our financing arrangements and reduced cash flow from our operations, which, in turn, could materially adversely affect our business and cash flows. See “—Risks Relating to Economic, Market and Political Matters—Changes to the economic, political, credit, and/or financial environment in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business, such as affecting consumer demand for beverage products, which could impact our customers and as a result, reduce the demand for our products” and “Item 8.

Table of Contents

Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividend Policy” for further details.

We may not be able to raise additional capital or only be able to raise additional capital at significantly increased costs or by diluting our shareholders.

We may require additional cash resources due to changed business conditions or other future developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue. If our current resources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or incur debt under credit facilities we may put in place. The sale of additional equity securities could result in the dilution of our current shareholders, potentially triggering a change of control under the terms of our bond indentures, and the incurrence of additional indebtedness could further limit our ability to pay dividends or require us to seek consents for the payment of dividends, increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions and limit our ability to pursue our business strategies. See “—Our substantial debt could adversely affect our financial health and our ability to effectively manage and grow our business” for a further discussion on how the incurrence of indebtedness could reduce the availability of our cash flow, which could materially adversely affect our business.

Furthermore, we cannot assure you that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. For example, deteriorating economic conditions, such as an increase in interest rates or disruptions in global capital markets, could make it more difficult for us to secure financings. See “—Risks Relating to Economic, Market and Political Matters—Changes to the economic, political, credit, and/or financial environment in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business, such as affecting consumer demand for beverage products, which could impact our customers and as a result, reduce the demand for our products” for further detail on deteriorating economic conditions. If we are unable to raise additional capital, or if the cost of raising additional capital significantly increases, as is the case when central banks raise benchmark interest rates, we may be unable to make necessary or desired capital expenditures, take advantage of investment opportunities, refinance existing indebtedness or meet unexpected financial requirements. This could cause us to default on our indebtedness, delay or abandon anticipated expenditures and investments, or otherwise limit our operations, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or prospects.

Risks Relating to Our Shares

We are ultimately controlled by AHSA, which is principally owned by former holders of certain indebtedness of AGSA and its affiliates, primarily comprising major financial institutions and investment funds, and whose interests may conflict with our interests and the interests of our other shareholders and stakeholders.

As of December 31, 2025, AHSA indirectly owns approximately 76% of our outstanding Ordinary Shares through its direct wholly-owned subsidiary, AGSA and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries and, under the Business Combination Agreement, AGSA has the right to receive up to an additional 60,730,000 Ordinary Shares (the “Earnout Shares”) if the trading prices of Ordinary Shares exceed certain specified amounts during specified periods of time. As the controlling shareholder of the Company and AGSA, AHSA is able to exercise significant influence over our business policies and affairs, including the composition of our Board and any action requiring shareholder approval.  In addition, as long as AGSA beneficially owns a specified number of the outstanding Ordinary Shares, pursuant to the Shareholders Agreement, AGSA has the right to designate a specified number of directors, including the chair, to our Board, receive access to certain information for the benefit of AGSA, approve certain of our significant actions, receive our cooperation with certain matters relating to us, and access certain information for registration rights with respect to its Ordinary Shares. For more information, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions–B. Related Party Transactions.”

Table of Contents

AHSA’s ultimate shareholders principally comprise former holders of certain indebtedness of AGSA and its affiliates, and are predominantly major financial institutions and investment funds. It is also possible that AHSA’s shareholders have other business interests that conflict with our own business interests, which may cause those shareholders to take actions that are in their own best interests and not in the best interests of the Company or our other shareholders. Further, the owners of AHSA may pursue interests and strategies distinct from those pursued by our previous ultimate controlling shareholders, including seeking liquidity for their shares or to enhance the short-term value of their investment (such as by preferring distributions over capital investments), even though such actions might involve risks to other shareholders or result in an indirect or direct change of control of the Company.

In addition, because we are a controlled company, risks materializing at the parent level, including in relation to litigation, open judicial proceedings or regulatory matters, arising in the normal course of business or in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction, could have an adverse impact on our share price, financial condition, credit ratings or reputation.

See “—Risks Relating to Being a Luxembourg Company and Our Status as a Foreign Private Issuer—We qualify for and rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements” for discussion on the corporate governance exemptions that we avail ourselves of as a controlled company.

The trading price of our Ordinary Shares may be volatile and holders of our securities could incur substantial losses.

The trading price of our Ordinary Shares could be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. Any of the factors listed below could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our Ordinary Shares and the Ordinary Shares may trade at prices significantly below the price you paid for them. In addition, the trading price of our Ordinary Shares may not recover and may experience a further decline.

Factors affecting the trading price of our securities may include:

Table of Contents

In addition, the stock market may experience periods of unusual volatility that, in some cases, is unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. See “—Risks Relating to Economic, Market and Political Matters—Changes to the economic, political, credit and/or financial environment in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business, such as affecting consumer demand for beverage products, which could impact our customers and as a result, reduce the demand for our products” for a more detailed discussion of the global economic environment. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our Ordinary Shares, regardless of our actual operating performance.

In the past, following periods of market volatility, shareholders have instituted securities class action litigation. Our involvement in securities litigation could have a substantial cost and divert resources and the attention of executive management from our business regardless of the outcome of such litigation.

Future sales of our Ordinary Shares, including by AGSA, the Subscribers and the GHV Sponsor could have an adverse impact on the price of our Ordinary Shares.

Future sales of our Ordinary Shares, or Warrants, including by the Subscribers, the GHV Sponsor and AGSA, or the perception that sales may be made by these shareholders could significantly reduce the market price of our Ordinary Shares. Further, even if none of these shareholders sell a large number of our Ordinary Shares into the market, their right to sell their Ordinary Shares as contemplated by the Registration Rights and Lock-Up Agreement and the Subscription Agreements may depress the price of our Ordinary Shares. Substantially all of our Ordinary Shares may be sold in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, which could have the effect of increasing the volatility in the price of our Ordinary Shares or putting significant downward pressure on their price. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions–B. Related Party Transactions.”

Table of Contents

The Warrants are exercisable for our Ordinary Shares, which may increase the number of our Ordinary Shares eligible for future resale in the public market and may result in dilution to our shareholders, and may adversely affect the market price of our Ordinary Shares.

Outstanding Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 16,749,984 of our Ordinary Shares are exercisable in accordance with the terms of the Warrant Agreement. The Warrants are exercisable at the exercise price of $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment as described in the Warrant Agreement as set forth under “Exhibit 2.7—Description of Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act.” To the extent such Warrants are exercised, additional Ordinary Shares will be issued, which will result in dilution to the holders of our Ordinary Shares and increase the number of our Ordinary Shares eligible for resale in the public market.

There is no guarantee that the Warrants will not expire worthless and we may redeem unexpired Warrants prior to their exercise at a time that could be disadvantageous to a Warrant holder.

The exercise price for our Warrants is $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment as described in the Warrant Agreement as set forth under “Exhibit 2.7—Description of Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act.” The Warrants are exercisable until 5.00 p.m. New York City time on the earlier to occur of: (x) August 4, 2026, or (y) the redemption date as provided in Section 6.3 of the Warrant Agreement, subject to the terms of the Warrant Agreement. Based on the trading price of our Ordinary Shares, it is uncertain if any of our Warrants will be in-the-money at any time prior to their expiration. As a result the Warrants may expire worthless. In addition, we have the ability to redeem outstanding Warrants pursuant to the Warrant Agreement, subject to the conditions as set forth under “Exhibit 2.7—Description of Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act.” If the Warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right at a time that could be disadvantageous to a Warrant holder. Additionally, in November 2025, proceedings were commenced to delist the Warrants from the NYSE due to “abnormally low selling price” levels and therefore, the Warrants are available for trading over-the-counter only. Accordingly, the market liquidity for the Warrants may be adversely impacted.

We have issued and may issue in the future Ordinary Shares or offer options, restricted shares and certain forms of share-based compensation, which have the potential to dilute shareholder value and cause the price of our Ordinary Shares to decline.

We have issued and may issue in the future Ordinary Shares or offer share options, restricted shares and certain forms of share-based compensation to our directors, officers and employees in the future. If we issue additional Ordinary Shares, any options that we issue are exercised, or any restricted shares that we may issue vest, and those shares are sold into the public market, the ownership of our existing shareholders would be diluted and our earnings per share could be reduced, which may adversely affect the market price of our Ordinary Shares. In addition, the availability of Ordinary Shares for award under any equity incentive plan we may introduce, or the grant of share options, restricted shares or other forms of share-based compensation, may adversely affect the market price of our Ordinary Shares. See “—Risks Relating to Our Capital Structure—We may not be able to raise additional capital or only be able to raise additional capital at significantly increased costs or by diluting our shareholders” for a discussion surrounding circumstances that would results in the issuance of additional Ordinary Shares.

If we do not pay dividends on our Ordinary Shares, you may not receive any return on investment unless you sell your shares for a price greater than that which you are deemed to have paid for it.

Even though we issued dividends on our Ordinary Shares on a quarterly basis in 2025, the declaration, amount and payment of any future dividends will be determined by our Board. Our Board may take into account general and economic conditions, our financial condition and operating results, our available cash, current and anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, contractual, legal, tax and regulatory restrictions, implications on the payment of dividends by us to our shareholders and such other factors as the Board may deem relevant. For more information on our policy regarding dividends, see “Item 8.

Table of Contents

Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividend Policy.”

In addition, as we are a holding company, our ability to pay dividends on our Ordinary Shares may be limited by restrictions on our ability to obtain sufficient funds through dividends from subsidiaries, including restrictions under the terms of the agreements governing the current indebtedness of us and our subsidiaries or future indebtedness that we or our subsidiaries may incur. Subject to any limitations referred to above, or as prescribed by the provisions of the laws of Luxembourg (“Luxembourg Law”), the declaration of future dividends, if any, will depend upon our future operations and earnings, capital expenditure requirements, general financial conditions, legal and contractual restrictions and other factors.

Risks Relating to Being a Luxembourg Company and Our Status as a Foreign Private Issuer

As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from a number of U.S. securities laws and rules and are permitted to publicly disclose less information than U.S. public companies are required to disclose, which may limit the information available to holders of our Ordinary Shares. Conversely, if we lose our foreign private issuer status in the future, this could result in significant additional costs and expenses.

We currently qualify as a “foreign private issuer,” as defined under the SEC’s rules and regulations, and, consequently, we are not subject to all of the disclosure requirements applicable to public companies organized within the United States. For example, we are exempt from certain rules under the Exchange Act that regulate disclosure obligations and procedural requirements related to the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations applicable to securities registered under the Exchange Act. While our officers and directors are exempt from the “short-swing” profit recovery revisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and related rules thereunder, on March 18, 2026, our officers and directors will no longer be exempt from reporting under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act with respect to their purchases and sales of our Ordinary Shares, such that any such sales will be required to be disclosed in the same manner as they are disclosed  by officers and directors of United States public companies. Accordingly, as such sales begin to be disclosed, the price of our Ordinary Shares may be impacted. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. public companies are, and are also not subject to Regulation FD under the Exchange Act, which would prohibit us from selectively disclosing material non-public information to certain persons without concurrently making a widespread public disclosure of such information. Accordingly, there may be less publicly available information concerning us than there is for U.S. public companies.

As a foreign private issuer, we are required to file an Annual Report on Form 20-F within four months of the close of each fiscal year ended December 31, and furnish reports on Form 6-K relating to certain material events promptly after we publicly announce these events. However, because of the exemptions for foreign private issuers mentioned above, our shareholders will not be afforded the same information generally available to investors holding shares in public companies that are not foreign private issuers.

We could lose our foreign private issuer status if a majority of our Ordinary Shares are held by residents in the United States, and we fail to meet any one of the additional “business contacts” requirements. The regulatory and compliance costs to us if we are deemed to be a U.S. domestic issuer may be significantly higher than costs we incur as a foreign private issuer. If the Company is not a foreign private issuer, we will be required to file periodic reports and prospectuses on U.S. domestic issuer forms with the SEC, which are more detailed and extensive than the forms available to a foreign private issuer. For example, we would become subject to the proxy rules under the Exchange Act. In addition, we would be required to change our basis of accounting from IFRS Accounting Standards as issued by the IASB to U.S. GAAP, which may be difficult and costly for us to comply with. If we lose our foreign private issuer status and fail to comply with the standards applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, we may have to de-list from NYSE, and could be subject to investigation by the SEC, NYSE and other regulators, among other potentially materially adverse consequences.

Table of Contents

The SEC is currently reexamining the eligibility criteria for foreign private issuer status and exemptions it provides, particularly as regards those companies which are only listed in the United States. While the SEC has not to date proposed any specific rules and any such rulemaking will require notice and an opportunity for public comment, changes to the eligibility criteria or other rules impacting foreign private issuers could have some or all of the impacts described above or additional unanticipated consequences, any of which could increase our regulatory burden or have other materially adverse consequences.

U.S. investors may have difficulty enforcing civil liabilities against us and our directors and officers.

We are organized under the laws of Luxembourg. In addition, a substantial amount of our assets are located outside the United States, and many of our directors and officers reside outside the United States and will continue to reside outside the United States. As a result, although we have appointed an agent for service of process in the United States, investors may not be able to effect service of process within the United States upon us or these persons or enforce judgments obtained against us or these persons in U.S. courts, including judgments in actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Likewise, it also may be difficult for an investor to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained against us or these persons in courts located in jurisdictions outside the United States, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Awards of punitive damages in actions brought in the United States or elsewhere are generally not enforceable in Luxembourg.

Any judgments obtained in any U.S. federal or state court against us may have to be enforced in the courts of Luxembourg or other EU member states. As there is no treaty in force on the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters between the United States and Luxembourg, courts in Luxembourg will not automatically recognize and enforce a final judgment rendered by a U.S. court. A valid judgment obtained from a court of competent jurisdiction in the United States may be entered and enforced through a court of competent jurisdiction in Luxembourg, subject to compliance with the enforcement procedures (exequatur). The enforceability in Luxembourg courts of judgments rendered by U.S. courts will be subject, prior to any enforcement in Luxembourg, to the procedure and the conditions set forth in the Luxembourg procedural code, which conditions may include the following (which may change):

Table of Contents

In addition, actions brought in a Luxembourg court against us, the members of our Board or our officers to enforce liabilities based on U.S. federal securities laws may be subject to certain restrictions. In particular, Luxembourg courts generally do not award punitive damages. Litigation in Luxembourg also is subject to rules of procedure that differ from the U.S. rules, including, with respect to the taking and admissibility of evidence, the conduct of the proceedings and the allocation of costs. Proceedings in Luxembourg would have to be conducted in the French or German language, and all documents submitted to the court would, in principle, have to be translated into French or German. For these reasons, it may be difficult for a U.S. investor to bring an action in a Luxembourg court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us, the members of our Board or our officers. In addition, even if a judgment against us, the members of our Board or our officers based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws is obtained, a U.S. investor may not be able to enforce it in U.S. or Luxembourg courts.

Our directors and officers have entered into indemnification agreements with us as permitted under our Articles. Under such agreements, our directors and officers are entitled to indemnification from us to the fullest extent permitted by Luxemburg law against liability and expenses reasonably incurred or paid by them in connection with claims, actions, suits or proceedings in which they become involved as a party or otherwise by virtue of performing or having performed as a director or officer, and against amounts paid or incurred by them in the settlement of such claims, actions, suits or proceedings. Luxembourg Law and our Articles permit us to keep directors indemnified against any expenses, judgments, fines and amounts paid in connection with liability of a director towards us or a third party for management errors, i.e., for wrongful acts committed during the execution of the mandate (mandat) granted to the director by us, except in connection with criminal offenses, gross negligence, fraud or dishonesty. The rights to and obligations of indemnification among or between us and any of our current or former directors and officers are generally governed by the laws of Luxembourg and subject to the jurisdiction of the Luxembourg courts, unless such rights or obligations do not relate to or arise out of such persons’ capacities listed above. Although there is doubt as to whether U.S. courts would enforce this indemnification provision in an action brought in the United States under U.S. federal or state securities laws, this provision could make it more difficult to obtain judgments outside Luxembourg or from non-Luxembourg jurisdictions that would apply Luxembourg Law against our assets in Luxembourg.

Luxembourg and European insolvency and bankruptcy laws are substantially different from U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws and may offer our shareholders less protection than they would have under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws.

As a company organized under the laws of Luxembourg and with its registered office in Luxembourg, we are subject to Luxembourg insolvency and bankruptcy laws in the event any insolvency proceedings are initiated against it including, among other things, Council and European Parliament Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of May 20, 2015 on insolvency proceedings (recast). Should courts in another European country determine that the insolvency and bankruptcy laws of that country apply to the Company in accordance with and subject to such European Union regulations, the courts in that country could have jurisdiction over the insolvency proceedings initiated against us. Insolvency and bankruptcy laws in Luxembourg or the relevant other European country, if any, may offer our shareholders less protection than they would have under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws and make it more difficult for them to recover the amount they could expect to recover in a liquidation under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws.

The rights of our shareholders may differ from the rights they would have as shareholders of a U.S. corporation and consequently our shareholders may have more difficulty protecting their interests.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our Articles and Luxembourg Law, including the Luxembourg Companies Law. The rights of our shareholders and the responsibilities of our directors and officers under Luxembourg Law are different from those applicable to a corporation incorporated in the United States.

In the performance of its duties, the Board is required to act as a collegiate body in the interest of the Company. It is possible that the Company may have interests that are different from interests of the shareholders. If any member of our Board has a direct or indirect financial interest in a matter which has to be considered by the Board that conflicts with the interests of the Company, Luxembourg Law provides that such director will not be entitled to participate in deliberations on, and exercise his vote with respect to the approval of such transaction.

Table of Contents

If the interest of such a member of the Board does not conflict with the interests of the Company, then the applicable director with such interest may participate in deliberations on, and vote on the approval of, that transaction. Further, under Luxembourg Law, there may be less publicly available information about the Company than is regularly published by or about U.S. domestic issuers. In addition, Luxembourg Law governing the securities of Luxembourg companies may not be as extensive as those in effect in the United States, and Luxembourg Law and regulations in respect of corporate governance matters might not be as protective of minority shareholders as state corporation laws in the United States. Therefore, our shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in connection with actions taken by its directors and officers or its principal shareholders than they would as shareholders of a corporation incorporated in the United States.

Neither our Articles nor Luxembourg Law provides for appraisal rights for dissenting shareholders in certain extraordinary corporate transactions that may otherwise be available to shareholders under certain U.S. state laws. As a result of these differences, our shareholders may have more difficulty protecting their interests than they would as shareholders of a U.S. domestic issuer.

Our Articles include compulsory share transfer provisions that may not provide our minority shareholders with the same benefits as they would have in a merger of a Delaware corporation.

We have included in our Articles provisions that give the holder of 75% or more of the number of our outstanding Ordinary Shares (which would include AHSA for so long as it indirectly holds the requisite number of our Ordinary Shares) the right to acquire our outstanding Ordinary Shares held by all other holders at such time for a purchase price payable in cash that is equal to the fair market value of such Ordinary Shares, as determined by an independent investment banking firm of international reputation in accordance with the procedures contained in our Articles. These procedures include a dispute resolution provision permitting holders of at least 10% of the Ordinary Shares held by our minority shareholders at that time to dispute the purchase price proposed by the acquiring shareholder. It is uncertain whether our minority shareholders will be able to coordinate with each other in a manner that will enable them to take full advantage of these provisions. There can be no assurance that these provisions would result in a price as favorable to our minority shareholders as they would receive in a transaction subject to Delaware law and appraisal rights.

Anti-takeover provisions in our Articles might discourage or delay attempts to acquire it.

Our Articles contain provisions that may make acquisition of the Company more difficult, including the following:

Table of Contents

These anti-takeover provisions could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of the Company, even if such transaction would benefit its shareholders.

We qualify for and rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements.

We are exempt from certain corporate governance requirements of the NYSE by virtue of being a “foreign private issuer” as such term is defined under U.S. securities laws and a “controlled company” as such term is defined under the corporate governance standards of the NYSE (the “NYSE Standards”) and are not subject to all the disclosure requirements applicable to public companies organized within the United States. As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow the corporate governance practice of our home country in lieu of certain provisions of the NYSE Standards. See “—As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from a number of U.S. securities laws and rules and are permitted to publicly disclose less information than U.S. public companies are required to disclose, which may limit the information available to holders of our Ordinary Shares. Conversely, if we lose our foreign private issuer status in the future, this could result in significant additional costs and expenses” and “Item 16G. Corporate Governance” for more information.

As we are a controlled company within the meaning of the NYSE Standards, we are not required to comply with the following requirements:

We currently avail ourselves of the exemption that allows our compensation committee and nominating and governance committees not to be composed entirely of independent directors. There can be no assurance that we will not avail ourselves of other controlled company exemptions in the future. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices—Controlled Company” and “Item 16G. Corporate Governance” for more information.

As a result of the foregoing exemptions afforded to us as a foreign private issuer and controlled company, we can cease voluntary compliance at any time, and our shareholders may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE Standards.

​

​

Table of Contents

Holders generally will be subject to a 15% withholding tax on payment of dividends made on the Ordinary Shares under current Luxembourg tax law.

Under current Luxembourg tax law, payments of dividends made on the Ordinary Shares generally are subject to a 15% Luxembourg withholding tax. Certain exemptions or reductions in the withholding tax may apply, but it will be up to the holders to claim any available refunds from the Luxembourg tax authority. For more information on the taxation implications, see “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation.”

Item 4. Information on the Company

A.History and development of the Company

Ardagh Group traces its origins back to 1932 in Dublin, Ireland, when the Irish Glass Bottle Company was founded and listed on the Irish Stock Exchange. Ardagh Group operated a single glass plant in Dublin, largely serving the domestic beverage and food customer base until 1998, when Yeoman International took an initial stake in Ardagh Group.

Since 1999, Ardagh Group has played a major role in the consolidation of the global metal and glass packaging industries, completing 24 acquisitions and significantly increasing its scope, scale, and geographic presence.

AMPSA was incorporated under the laws of Luxembourg on January 20, 2021 as a public limited liability company (société anonyme) having its registered office at 56, rue Charles Martel, L-2134 Luxembourg, Luxembourg and registered with the Luxembourg Register of Commerce and Companies (Registre de Commerce et des Sociétés de Luxembourg) under number B 251465. As at December 31, 2025, we operated 23 production facilities globally, located in Europe (twelve), North America (eight) and Brazil (three). These comprise 18 facilities producing beverage cans, four facilities producing can ends and one facility producing both cans and ends. The history and development of our production facility footprint has been as follows:

Table of Contents

The SEC maintains an internet site at www.sec.gov that contains reports and information statements and other information regarding registrants like us that file electronically with the SEC.

We routinely post important information on our website https://www.ardaghmetalpackaging.com/investors. The contents of the website are not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.

​

Our agent for service in the United States is: Ardagh Metal Packaging USA Corp., 8770 W. Bryn Mawr Avenue, Chicago, IL 60631 (Telephone: +1 (773) 399-3000).

B. Business Overview

We are one of the leading suppliers of consumer metal beverage packaging in the world and believe that we hold the #2 or #3 market positions in Europe, the United States and Brazil. The global beverage can industry is a large, consumer-driven industry with attractive growth characteristics. Our end-use categories include beer, carbonated soft drinks, energy drinks, sparkling waters, hard seltzers, juices, pre-mixed cocktails, teas and wine. Our customers include a wide variety of leading beverage products, which value our packaging products for their convenience, quality and sustainability, as well as the end-user appeal they offer through design, innovation and brand promotion. With our significant invested capital base, supported by consistent levels of re-investment, our extensive technical capabilities and manufacturing know-how, we believe we are well-positioned to continue to meet the dynamic needs of our global customers.

The global metal packaging industry is worth more than $140 billion, with the metal can packaging market representing nearly 60%, according to an October 2024 report from Smithers Pira, a leading independent market research firm with extensive specialized experience in the packaging, paper and print industries. We compete in the beverage can sector of the consumer and metal packaging industry. Because the consumer metal packaging industry primarily supplies packaging for food, drinks and other basic needs, it is considered to be a relatively stable market sector that is less sensitive to economic cycles than many other industries.  

Table of Contents

We serve over 200 customers across more than 40 countries, comprised of multi-national companies and large national and regional companies. In our target regions of Europe, North America and Brazil, our customers include a wide variety of companies owning some of the best-known brands in the world. We have a stable customer base with long-standing relationships and over 80% of our sales are generated under multi-year contracts, with the remainder largely subject to annual arrangements. A significant portion of our sales volumes are supplied under contracts which include input cost pass through provisions, which help us deliver generally consistent absolute margins.

As at December 31, 2025, we operated 23 production facilities in nine countries and employed approximately 6,500 personnel. Our production facilities are generally located to serve our customers’ filling locations. Certain production facilities may also be dedicated to specific end-use categories, enhancing product-specific expertise and generating benefits of scale and production efficiency. Significant capital has been invested in our extensive network of long-lived production facilities, which, together with our skilled workforce and related manufacturing process know-how, supports our competitive positions.

We are committed to market-leading innovation and product development and maintain dedicated innovation, development and engineering centers in the United States and Europe to support these efforts. These facilities focus on three main areas: (i) innovations that provide enhanced product design, differentiation and user experience for our customers and end-use consumers; (ii) innovations that reduce input costs to generate cost savings for both our customers and us (e.g. downgauging); and (iii) developments to meet evolving product safety standards and regulations.

Sustainability

Sustainability is a core part of our business, and our sustainability strategy is built upon three pillars – Emissions, Ecology and Social, focusing on minimizing our GHG emissions, reducing our environmental footprint and promoting circularity to ensure minimal impact on the planet. We are committed to investing in our people and the communities where we operate. Our focus on sustainability has been recognized by various external organizations. In 2025, Ardagh Group was awarded a platinum rating from EcoVadis. AMPSA received management ratings of B for water management and climate change and A for supplier engagement from CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project).

Emissions

The Emissions pillar of our sustainability strategy aligns to the SBTi and aims to minimize our GHG emissions and other potential emissions to air. We are targeting to reduce our Scope 1& 2 and Scope 3 emissions by 42% and 12.3% respectively by 2030 from a 2020 baseline, in line with the Paris Agreement, under which select governments pledged to hold the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. These targets were approved by the SBTi in 2022. We have launched a wide range of initiatives to work towards achieving these targets, including procuring electricity from renewable sources.

We also take a holistic approach across our operations and supply chains working in close collaboration with our industry associations to increase recycled content and reduce emissions from our materials and operations. Recycling rates for aluminum beverage cans are relatively high in the geographies in which we operate, estimated at 43% in the United States, 75% in Europe and 97% in Brazil. The use of recycled aluminum reduces energy consumption by 95% compared with the alternative of producing aluminum cans from its virgin source. In addition, we have identified several strategic activities to support emissions reductions, including using less material, lightweighting the aluminum we use in our products without sacrificing quality and optimizing logistics to reduce fuel usage.

​

​

Table of Contents

Ecology

The Ecology pillar of our sustainability strategy is focused on reducing water consumption and waste to minimize our impact on the environment and contributing to a more sustainable future. Water plays a key role in various stages  of our manufacturing processes, including forming, washing, rinsing and cooling of beverage cans. We recognize that water scarcity affects an increasing number of regions worldwide as well as the strategic significance of water as a finite and essential resource, and have set targets to reduce water usage across our global operations. We also recognize the negative impact that waste being sent to landfills is having on our ecosystems and GHG emissions. Through reusing and recycling, we aim to prevent our packaging and waste materials ending up in landfills. When reusing and recycling  is not possible, we apply controls and treatment technologies to help prevent human health effects and minimize the environmental impacts of disposal.

Social

The Social pillar of our sustainability strategy embodies our commitment to build a safe, diverse, equal and inclusive workforce focused on customer satisfaction and improving the communities we do business in. We recognize the pivotal role of our people and communities in driving long-term sustainable transformation We aim to ensure a safe and healthy workplace for all our employees by embedding a culture of safety awareness. Broad principles are supported by detailed policies and procedures to minimize accidents and injuries through continuous training and education. We are committed to promoting a culture of integrity and respect in the workplace, and continue to believe a fair, open and inclusive work environment can enhance both the performance of the Group and the well-being and experience of our employees.

Information Technology

Our IT systems are integral to our entire business and cover our manufacturing, procurement, accounting and telecommunication systems, among others. They are designed and organized to support our daily business operations, compliance, financial information and reporting, and we have dedicated resources to maintain and optimize our IT portfolio with additional support from external IT partners. We follow a balanced IT strategy, maintaining and carefully improving our core systems that support our day-to-day business operations, while also exploring new and emerging technologies and the benefits they can provide to our business, such as increasing group-wide quality and efficiency. Recent examples include a dedicated focus on the use of cloud, advanced data analytics, and AI. For a discussion on our cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance, please see “Item 16K. Cybersecurity.”

Development

Our leading global positions have been established through organic expansion and strategic growth initiatives, we have also expanded our footprint through strategic investments in new capacity to support our customers’ growth, and in December 2020 we acquired a large brownfield building and site in Huron, Ohio, which has been converted into a new beverage can and ends plant, with ends production having commenced in November 2021 and beverage can production in July 2022. These initiatives, as well as other acquisitions and investments over many years, in existing and adjacent end-use categories, have increased our scale and diversification and provided opportunities to grow our business with both existing and new customers.

In February 2021, we announced a $1.8 billion growth investment program for the period 2021-2024, comprised of multiple projects which are nearing completion, to support our customers’ growth and to enhance our productivity in response to the positive demand outlook.

Our profit for the year ended December 31, 2025, was $11 million. Adjusted EBITDA and net cash from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2025, were $739 million and $449 million, respectively.

Table of Contents

The following chart illustrates the breakdown of our revenue by destination for the year ended December 31, 2025:

Total revenue of our two operating and reportable segments, Europe and Americas, for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $2,307 million and $3,190 million, respectively.

Our Industry

The global packaging industry is a large, consumer-driven industry with stable growth characteristics. We operate in the metal beverage can sector and our target regions are Europe, North America and Brazil. Metal beverage cans are attractive to brand owners, as their strength and rigidity allows them to be filled at high speeds and easily transported, resulting in further efficiencies through the supply chain. The ability to customize and differentiate products supplied in metal beverage cans, through innovative design, shaping and printing, also appeals to our customers. The metal market has been marked by progressive lightweighting, which has generated material savings in input costs and logistics, while enhancing the consumer experience. This reduction in raw material and energy usage in the manufacturing process has also increased the appeal to end-users, who are increasingly focused on sustainability.

Our Competitive Strengths

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Our Business Strategy

Our principal objective remains to increase shareholder value by achieving growth in Adjusted EBITDA and cash generation. We aim to achieve this objective through organically growing our business, but will also continue to evaluate other acquisitions and strategic opportunities to enhance shareholder value. We pursue these objectives through the following strategies:

Table of Contents

Manufacturing and Production

As of December 31, 2025, we operated 23 production facilities in nine countries and had approximately 6,500 employees. Our production facilities are currently located in seven European countries, as well as in the United States and Brazil.

The following table summarizes our principal production facilities as of December 31, 2025.

* Excluding digital print locations.

​

​

Table of Contents

​

Industry Overview

​

We operate in the beverage can segment of the consumer metal packaging industry.

​

The beverage can sector has delivered sustained multi-year growth in Europe and North America, while Brazil remained a robust market despite a slight recent moderation in demand. In each of these markets, the long-term cumulative acceleration in demand for metal beverage cans is principally driven by new beverage product innovations, increased awareness by consumers of sustainability and pack mix shifts. In addition, the convenience of filling, transporting and stocking beverage cans, compared with alternative substrates are believed to be contributing to this growth. Growth in unit volumes of specialty beverage cans has exceeded growth in standard beverage cans, thereby increasing specialty can penetration.

We believe the purchasing decisions of retail consumers are significantly influenced by packaging. Consumer product manufacturers and marketers are increasingly using packaging to position their products in the market and differentiate them from alternative products. A growing awareness of sustainability issues among consumers, as well as potential regulatory or legislative changes in this area, are also expected to influence future packaging decisions by consumer product manufacturers. See “—Sustainability” for further details on our sustainability strategy. The development and production of premium, differentiated packaging products with additional value-added features require a higher level of design capabilities, manufacturing and process know-how and quality control than for more standardized products.

Customers

We operate production facilities in Europe, the United States and Brazil, and we sell metal beverage cans to multinational, regional and national customers in these regions. We supply leading manufacturers in each of the markets we serve, including AB InBev, Carlsberg (including the recently acquired Britvic), Celsius Holdings (which recently acquired Alani Nu and Rockstar Energy), Cidade Imperial, Coca-Cola, Heineken, Keuring Dr. Pepper, Mark Anthony Brands, Molson Coors, Monster Beverage, National Beverage Company and PepsiCo among others.

Our top ten customers represented approximately 57% of our revenue in 2025. Over 80% of our revenue is backed by multi-year supply agreements, ranging from two to seven years in duration. These contracts generally provide for the pass through of metal price fluctuations as well as a mechanism for the recovery of non-metal input cost inflation, while others have tolling arrangements whereby customers arrange for the procurement of metal themselves. In addition, within multi-year relationships, both parties can work together to streamline the product, service and supply process, leading to significant cost reductions and improvements in product and service, with benefits arising to both parties. Wherever possible, we seek to enter into multi-year supply agreements with our customers. In other cases, sales are made under commercial supply agreements, typically of one-year’s duration, with prices based on expected purchase volumes.

Competitors

Our principal competitors in metal beverage packaging include Ball Corporation, Crown Holdings, and CANPACK.

​

​

​

Table of Contents

Raw Materials and Suppliers

The principal raw materials used in our business are aluminum, coatings and lining compounds. Our major aluminum suppliers include Novelis, Speira, Tri-Arrows, Constellium, Aluminium Dynamics and Kaiser Aluminum.

We continuously seek to minimize the price of raw materials and reduce exposure to price movements, including through the following:

Aluminum is typically purchased under three-year contracts, with pricing arrangements that are fixed in advance. Despite an increase in the level of aluminum production being targeted to new end-use applications, including automotive and aerospace, we believe that adequate quantities of the relevant grades of packaging aluminum will continue to be available from various producers and that we are not overly dependent upon any single supplier. Some of our aluminum requirements are subject to tolling arrangements with our customers, whereby risk and responsibility for the procurement of aluminum is managed by the customer.

Distribution

We use various freight and haulage contractors to make deliveries to customer sites or warehousing facilities. In certain cases, customers make their own delivery arrangements and therefore may purchase from us on an ex-works basis. Warehousing facilities are primarily situated at our production facilities. However, in certain regions, we rely on networks of externally-rented warehouses at strategic third-party locations close to major customers’ filling operations.

Innovation, Research and Development

The majority of our innovation, development and engineering activities are primarily concentrated at our regional technical center in Elk Grove, Illinois, and at our research facility in Bonn, Germany. These centers focus on identifying and serving the existing and potential needs of customers, including the achievement of cost reductions, particularly metal content reduction, and meeting new and anticipated legislative requirements, as well as providing technology, engineering and support services to our production facilities and customers.

We currently hold and maintain a number of patent families, filed in several jurisdictions and covering a range of different products.

Table of Contents

Environmental, Health and Safety

Our operations and properties are regulated under a wide range of laws, ordinances and regulations and other legal requirements concerning the environment, health and safety and product safety in each jurisdiction in which we operate. We believe that our production facilities are compliant, in all material respects, with these laws and regulations.

The principal environmental issues we face include the environmental impact of the disposal of water used in our production processes, generation and disposal of waste, the receiving, use and storage of hazardous and non-hazardous materials, the potential contamination and subsequent remediation of land, surface water and groundwater arising from our operations and the impact on air quality through gas and particle emissions, including the emission of greenhouse gases.

We are also committed to ensuring that safe operating practices are established, implemented and maintained throughout our organization. In addition, we have instituted active health and safety programs throughout our company. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Legal and Regulatory Matters—We are subject to various environmental and other legal requirements and may be subject to additional requirements that could impose substantial costs upon us.”

Europe

Our substantial operations in the European Union are subject to, among additional requirements, the requirements of the EU IED which requires that operators of industrial installations, including can-making installations, take into account the whole environmental performance of the installation and obtain and maintain compliance with a permit, which sets emission limit values that are based on best available techniques.

Furthermore, the EU Environmental Liability Directive relating to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage aims to make those who cause damage to the environment (specifically damage to habitats and species protected by EU law, damage to water resources and land contamination which presents a threat to human health) financially responsible for its remediation. It requires operators of industrial premises (including those which hold a permit governed by the EU IED) to take preventive measures to avoid environmental damage, inform the regulators when such damage has or may occur and to remediate contamination.

United States

Our U.S. operations are also subject to stringent and complex U.S. federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection, including the discharge of materials into the environment, health and safety and product safety including, but not limited to: the U.S. federal Clean Air Act, the U.S. federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, the U.S. federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”). These laws and regulations may, among other things (i) require obtaining permits to conduct industrial operations; (ii) restrict the types and quantities and concentration of various substances that can be released into the environment; (iii) result in the suspension or revocation of necessary permits, licenses and authorizations; (iv) require that additional pollution controls be installed and (v) require remedial measures to mitigate pollution from former and ongoing operations, including related natural resource damages. Specifically, certain U.S. environmental laws, such as CERCLA and analogous state laws, provide for strict, and under certain circumstances, joint and several liability for the investigation and remediation of releases or the disposal of regulated materials into the environment including soil and groundwater, as well as for damages to natural resources.

Table of Contents

Deposit Return Systems

In North America, sales of beverage cans are affected by governmental regulation of packaging, including deposit return laws. At December 31, 2025, there were ten U.S. states with container deposit laws in effect, requiring consumer deposits of between 5 and 15 cents (USD), depending on the size of the container or product. In Canada, deposit laws cover some form of beverage container in all 10 provinces and three territories. The range for deposits is between 5 and 40 cents (Canadian Dollar), depending on size of container and type of beverage. In addition, many beverages and containers, particularly new product innovations and unique alcohol beverage products, are not clearly defined in U.S. and Canadian deposit laws, and local agencies provide final decisions on the application of deposit laws.

In Europe, 17 countries now operate packaging deposit return systems, driven by the EU’s Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation Directive. The wider roll out of deposit return systems in Europe could lead to cost increases for collection and recycling of beverage cans, as well as temporary demand disruption, and therefore potentially have impacts on the packaging material mix at retailers.

Table of Contents

C.Organizational structure

The following table provides information relating to our principal operating subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned, at December 31, 2025.

​

​

D.Property, plant and equipment

See “Item 4.—Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Manufacturing and Production.”

Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

The following discussion should be read together with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the audited consolidated financial statements of Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 including the related notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Annual Report. As used in this section, the “Group” refers to Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. and its subsidiaries.

Some of the measures used in this Annual Report are not measurements of financial performance under IFRS Accounting Standards and should not be considered an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of liquidity or an alternative to operating profit or profit/(loss) for the year, as indicators of our operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards.

Business Drivers

Table of Contents

The main factors affecting our results of operations for the Group are: (i) global economic trends, end-consumer demand for our products and production capacity of our production facilities; (ii) prices of energy and raw materials used in our business, primarily aluminum and coatings, and our ability to pass through these and other cost increases to our customers, through contractual pass through mechanisms under multi-year contracts, or through renegotiation in the case of short-term contracts; (iii) investment in capacity expansion and operating cost reductions; and (iv) foreign exchange rate fluctuations and currency translation risks arising from various currency exposures, primarily with respect to the euro, U.S. dollar, British pound and Brazilian real.

We generate our revenue from supplying metal can packaging to the beverage end-use category. Revenue is primarily dependent on sales volumes and sales prices. While we currently believe the recently implemented and additional proposed changes to tariffs are likely to have a minimal impact on the results of the Group’s operations, management continues to closely monitor the evolving environment and the potential impact on the Group.

Sales volumes are influenced by a number of factors, including factors driving customer demand, seasonality and the capacity of our metal beverage packaging plants. Demand for our metal beverage cans may be influenced by trends in the consumption of beverages, industry trends in packaging, including customer marketing and pricing decisions, and the impact of environmental regulations and shifts in consumer sentiment towards a greater awareness of sustainability. The demand for our beverage products is strongest during spells of warm weather and therefore demand typically, based on historical trends, peaks during the summer months, as well as in the period leading up to holidays in December. Accordingly, we generally build inventories in the first and fourth quarters in anticipation of the seasonal demands in our beverage business.

Our Adjusted EBITDA is based on revenue derived from selling our metal beverage cans and is affected by a number of factors, including cost of sales, and sales, marketing and administrative expenses. The elements of our cost of sales include (i) variable costs, such as energy, raw materials (including the cost of aluminum), packaging materials, decoration and freight and other distribution costs, and (ii) fixed costs, such as labor and other plant-related costs including depreciation and maintenance. Sales contracts generally provide for the pass through of metal and energy price fluctuations as well as a mechanism for the recovery of other input cost inflation. Our variable costs have typically constituted approximately 75% and fixed costs approximately 25% of the total cost of sales for our business.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards as issued by the IASB. A summary of material accounting policies is contained in note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements for the three years ended December 31, 2025. In applying accounting principles, we make assumptions, estimates and judgments which are often subjective and may be affected by changing circumstances or changes in our analysis. Material changes in these assumptions, estimates and judgments have the potential to materially alter the Group’s results of operations. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below.

Income taxes

We are subject to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions and judgment is therefore required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. There are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain during the ordinary course of business. We recognize liabilities for anticipated tax audit matters based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the income tax and deferred tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made.

Table of Contents

Measurement of employee benefit obligations

We follow the requirements of IAS 19 ‘Employee Benefits’ to determine the present value of our obligations to current and past employees in respect of defined benefit pension obligations, other long-term employee benefits and other end of service employee benefits, which are subject to similar fluctuations in value in the long-term. We, with the assistance of a network of professionals, value such liabilities designed to ensure consistency in the quality of the key assumptions underlying the valuations.

The principal pension assumptions used in the preparation of the audited consolidated financial statements take account of the different economic circumstances in the countries in which we operate and the different characteristics of the respective plans including the length of duration of the obligations.

The ranges of the principal assumptions applied in estimating defined benefit obligations for the Group's main schemes were:

​

​

Assumptions regarding future mortality experience are based on actuarial advice in accordance with published statistics and experience.

These assumptions translate into the following average life expectancy in years for a pensioner retiring at age 65. The mortality assumptions for the countries with the most significant defined benefit plans are set out below:

​

​

If the discount rate were to decrease by 50 basis points from management estimates, the carrying amount of the defined benefit obligations would increase by an estimated $21 million (2024: $22 million). If the discount rate were to increase by 50 basis points, the carrying amount of the defined benefit obligations would decrease by an estimated $20 million (2024: $19 million).

If the inflation rate were to decrease by 50 basis points from management estimates, the carrying amount of the defined benefit obligations would decrease by an estimated $10 million (2024: $9 million). If the inflation rate were to increase by 50 basis points, the carrying amount of the defined benefit obligations would increase by an estimated $9 million (2024: $10 million).

If the salary increase rate were to decrease by 50 basis points from management estimates, the carrying amount of the defined benefit obligations would decrease by an estimated $11 million (2024: $10 million). If the salary increase rate were to increase by 50 basis points, the carrying amount of the defined benefit obligations would increase by an estimated $10 million (2024: $11 million).

Table of Contents

The impact of increasing the life expectancy by one year would result in an increase in the net defined benefit obligation of the Group of $6 million at December 31, 2025 (2024: $6 million), holding all other assumptions constant.

Exceptional items

Our consolidated income statement, consolidated statement of cash flows and segmental analysis separately identify results before specific items. Specific items are those that in management’s judgment need to be disclosed by virtue of their size, nature or incidence to provide additional information. Such items include, where significant, restructuring, redundancy and other costs relating to permanent capacity realignment or footprint reorganization, directly attributable acquisition costs and acquisition integration costs, and other transaction-related costs, profit or loss on disposal or termination of operations, start-up costs incurred in relation to and associated with plant builds, significant new line investments, major litigation costs and settlements and impairments of non-current assets. In this regard the determination of “significant” as included in our definition uses qualitative and quantitative factors. We use our judgment in assessing the specific items, which by virtue of their scale and nature, are disclosed in our consolidated income statement, and related notes, as exceptional items. Our management considers columnar presentation to be appropriate in the consolidated income statement as it provides useful additional information and is consistent with the way that financial performance is measured by management and presented to the Board. Exceptional restructuring costs are classified as restructuring provisions and all other exceptional costs when outstanding at the reporting date are classified as exceptional items payable.

Valuation of Earnout Shares

The Group follows the guidance of IAS 32 ‘Financial Instruments: Presentation’ in accounting for the Earnout Shares. The Earnout Shares are recorded as a financial liability and measured at fair value at each reporting date, and are considered a critical accounting estimate in the comparative financial periods included in the audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. The key data inputs into the valuation are volatility, dividend yield, share price hurdles, share price, and risk-free rate. Volatility is the significant assumption in the valuation of the Earnout Shares as it is not directly market observable and there is estimation uncertainty involved in determining the assumed volatility. The critical assumptions and estimates applied are discussed in detail in note 22 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.

Recently adopted accounting standards and changes in accounting policies

The impact of new standards, amendments to existing standards and interpretations issued and effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2025 have been assessed by the Board. None of these new standards or amendments to existing standards effective January 1, 2025 have had or are expected to have a material impact for the Group.

Recent accounting pronouncements

New standards and amendments to existing standards and interpretations which are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2026, and have not been early adopted by the Group include IFRS 18 ‘Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements’ which will replace IAS 1 ‘Presentation of Financial Statements.’  IFRS 18 will retain many of the principles from IAS 1 with limited changes, in particular, it will not impact the recognition or measurement of items in the financial statements, or items which are presented in the income statement. IFRS 18 will introduce new presentation of items within the income statement, new required disclosures in the financial statements for certain management defined performance measures reported outside of an entity’s financial statements, and enhanced principles on aggregation and disaggregation which apply to the primary in the financial statements and notes in general. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2027 with retrospective application to all comparative periods. The Board’s assessment of the impact of this standard on the consolidated financial statements is on-going.

Table of Contents

The Board’s assessment of the impact of other new or amended standards which are not yet effective and which have not been early adopted by the Group, including  various Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 regarding ‘Contracts Referencing Nature-dependent Electricity’ and ‘Classification and the Measurement of Financial Instruments’, and IFRS 19 ‘Subsidiaries without Public Accountability’ is on-going however they are not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

A.Operating results

Year Ended December 31, 2025 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024

​

​

Revenue

Revenue in the year ended December 31, 2025, increased by $589 million, or 12%, to $5,497 million, compared with $4,908 million in the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase, excluding favorable foreign currency translation effects of $74 million, principally reflects the pass through of higher input costs to customers and favorable volume/mix effects.

Cost of sales

Cost of sales in the year ended December 31, 2025, increased by $538 million, or 13%, to $4,816 million, compared with $4,278 million in the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in cost of sales is principally due to the impact of higher sales as outlined above. Exceptional cost of sales were in line with the prior year. Further analysis of the movement in exceptional items is set out in “—Supplemental Management’s Discussion and Analysis.”

Gross profit

Gross profit in the year ended December 31, 2025, increased by $51 million, or 8%, to $681 million, compared with $630 million in the year ended December 31, 2024. Gross profit percentage in the year ended December 31, 2025, decreased by 40 basis points to 12.4%, compared with 12.8% in the year ended December 31, 2024. Excluding exceptional cost of sales, gross profit percentage in the year ended December 31, 2025, decreased by 50 basis points to 12.7%, compared with 13.2% in the year ended December 31, 2024, as a result of the items outlined above in revenue and cost of sales. Further analysis of the movement in exceptional items is set out in “—Supplemental Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Table of Contents

Sales, general and administration expenses

Sales, general and administration expenses in the year ended December 31, 2025, increased by $11 million, or 4%, to $299 million, compared with $288 million in the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in sales, general and administration expenses was due to higher exceptional sales, general and administration expenses in the current year. Excluding exceptional items, sales, general and administration expenses were in line with the prior year. Exceptional sales, general and administration expenses increased by $11 million, due to higher transaction-related and other costs in the current year. Further analysis of the movement in exceptional items is set out in “—Supplemental Management’s Discussion and Analysis.”

​

Intangible amortization

Intangible amortization in the year ended December 31, 2025, decreased by $2 million or 1%, to $138 million, compared with $140 million in the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to a decrease in the amortization of customer-related intangible assets.  

Operating profit

Operating profit in the year ended December 31, 2025, increased by $42 million, to $244 million compared with $202 million in the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase is primarily due to higher gross profit as outlined above, partly offset by higher sales, general and administration expenses.

​

Net finance expense

Net finance expense in the year ended December 31, 2025, was $240 million, compared with $192 million in the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $48 million. Net finance expense for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 comprised the following:

​

​

Senior Facilities interest expense increased by $18 million, or 13%, in the year ended December 31, 2025, compared with the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase primarily relates to interest and fees on the Senior Secured Term Loan.

​

Lease interest cost in the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased by $2 million to $23 million, compared with $25 million in the year ended December 31, 2024, driven by a decrease in lease obligations during the year and related interest thereon.

​

Table of Contents

Foreign currency translation losses in the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $6 million to $6 million, compared with $nil in the year ended December 31, 2024, driven by foreign exchange rate fluctuations during the year, primarily related to the U.S. dollar.

Losses on derivative financial instruments in the year ended December 31, 2025 amounted to $6 million, compared with a $5 million gain in the year ended December 31, 2024. The losses primarily related to the Group's virtual power purchase agreement ("vPPA").

​

$14 million net exceptional finance expenses includes premiums payable on and accelerated amortization of deferred debt issue costs and other expenses related to (i) the early redemption of the Group's $600 million 6.000% Senior Secured Green Notes due 2027; (ii) repayment of the Senior Secured Term Loan; and (iii) termination of the Group's cross currency interest rate swaps (“CCIRS”) in December 2025, partly offset by a gain on the movements in fair value of the Earnout Shares and Private and Public Warrants.  Exceptional net finance income for the year ended December 31, 2024, of $13 million primarily comprised of a gain on movements in the fair market values on the Earnout Shares, Private and Public Warrants.

Income tax credit/(charge)

Income tax credit in the year ended December 31, 2025 was $7 million, compared with a tax charge of $13 million in the year ended December 31, 2024.

​

The decrease in the income tax charge of $20 million is primarily attributable to a decrease in the profit before tax of $6 million (tax effect of $1 million at the standard rate of Luxembourg corporation tax), a decrease of $12 million in tax charge on tax losses for which no deferred tax was recognized, a decrease of $4 million in tax charge on non-deductible and other items, an increase of $3 million in prior year adjustments credits, and a decrease of $4 million in tax charge on income subject to state and other local income taxes, partially offset by an increase of $3 million in tax charge on re-measurement of deferred taxes relating to the decrease in the substantively enacted rate of corporation tax in Germany, and a decrease of $1 million in tax credit on income taxed at rates other than the standard rate of Luxembourg corporation tax.

​

The effective income tax rate on profit before exceptional items for the year ended December 31, 2025 was 30%, compared with a tax rate of 28% for the year ended December 31, 2024.  The increase in effective tax rate is primarily attributable to changes in profitability mix in the year ended December 31, 2025.

​

Profit for the year

As a result of the items described above, the profit for the year ended December 31, 2025, increased by $14 million to $11 million, compared with a $3 million loss in the year ended December 31, 2024.

​

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

Year Ended December 31, 2024 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2023

​